首页 > 最新文献

Animal Health Research Reviews最新文献

英文 中文
Comparative efficacy of blanket versus selective dry-cow therapy: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis. 毛毯疗法与选择性干牛疗法的疗效比较:系统回顾和两两荟萃分析。
IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000306
C B Winder, J M Sargeant, D F Kelton, S J Leblanc, T F Duffield, J Glanville, H Wood, K J Churchill, J Dunn, M D Bergevin, K Dawkins, S Meadows, A M O'Connor

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the efficacy of selective dry-cow antimicrobial therapy compared to blanket therapy (all quarters/all cows). Controlled trials were eligible if any of the following were assessed: incidence of clinical mastitis during the first 30 DIM, frequency of intramammary infection (IMI) at calving, or frequency of IMI during the first 30 DIM. From 3480 identified records, nine trials were data extracted for IMI at calving. There was an insufficient number of trials to conduct meta-analysis for the other outcomes. Risk of IMI at calving in selectively treated cows was higher than blanket therapy (RR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.16), but substantial heterogeneity was present (I2 = 58%). Subgroup analysis showed that, for trials using internal teat sealants, there was no difference in IMI risk at calving between groups, and no heterogeneity was present. For trials not using internal teat sealants, there was an increased risk in cows assigned to a selective dry-cow therapy protocol, compared to blanket treatment, with substantial heterogeneity in this subgroup. However, the small number of trials and heterogeneity in the subgroup without internal teat sealants suggests that the relative risk between treatments may differ from the determined point estimates based on other unmeasured factors.

进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定选择性干奶牛抗菌治疗与毯子治疗(所有小区/所有奶牛)的疗效。如果评估了以下任何一项,对照试验都是合格的:前30个DIM期间临床乳腺炎的发病率,产犊时乳腺内感染(IMI)的频率,或前30个DIM期间IMI的频率。从3480个已确定的记录中,提取了9个试验产犊时IMI的数据。试验数量不足,无法对其他结果进行荟萃分析。选择性治疗奶牛产犊时发生IMI的风险高于毯子治疗(RR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.16),但存在很大的异质性(I2 = 58%)。亚组分析显示,对于使用内乳头密封剂的试验,产犊时IMI风险在两组之间没有差异,也不存在异质性。对于不使用内乳密封剂的试验,与毯式治疗相比,选择干奶牛治疗方案的奶牛风险增加,该亚组存在很大的异质性。然而,在没有使用内乳头密封剂的亚组中,试验数量少且异质性表明,治疗之间的相对风险可能与基于其他未测量因素的确定点估计不同。
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of blanket versus selective dry-cow therapy: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis.","authors":"C B Winder,&nbsp;J M Sargeant,&nbsp;D F Kelton,&nbsp;S J Leblanc,&nbsp;T F Duffield,&nbsp;J Glanville,&nbsp;H Wood,&nbsp;K J Churchill,&nbsp;J Dunn,&nbsp;M D Bergevin,&nbsp;K Dawkins,&nbsp;S Meadows,&nbsp;A M O'Connor","doi":"10.1017/S1466252319000306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252319000306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the efficacy of selective dry-cow antimicrobial therapy compared to blanket therapy (all quarters/all cows). Controlled trials were eligible if any of the following were assessed: incidence of clinical mastitis during the first 30 DIM, frequency of intramammary infection (IMI) at calving, or frequency of IMI during the first 30 DIM. From 3480 identified records, nine trials were data extracted for IMI at calving. There was an insufficient number of trials to conduct meta-analysis for the other outcomes. Risk of IMI at calving in selectively treated cows was higher than blanket therapy (RR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.16), but substantial heterogeneity was present (I2 = 58%). Subgroup analysis showed that, for trials using internal teat sealants, there was no difference in IMI risk at calving between groups, and no heterogeneity was present. For trials not using internal teat sealants, there was an increased risk in cows assigned to a selective dry-cow therapy protocol, compared to blanket treatment, with substantial heterogeneity in this subgroup. However, the small number of trials and heterogeneity in the subgroup without internal teat sealants suggests that the relative risk between treatments may differ from the determined point estimates based on other unmeasured factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 2","pages":"217-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1466252319000306","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37663382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of injectable antibiotic options for the control of bovine respiratory disease in the first 45 days post arrival at the feedlot. 在到达饲养场后的头45天内用于控制牛呼吸道疾病的注射抗生素选择的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
IF 4.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252320000031
A M O'Connor, D Hu, S C Totton, N Scott, C B Winder, B Wang, C Wang, J Glanville, H Wood, B White, R Larson, C Waldner, J M Sargeant

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of antibiotics used to control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in beef cattle on feedlots. The information sources for the review were: MEDLINE®, MEDLINE In-Process and MEDLINE® Daily, AGRICOLA, Epub Ahead of Print, Cambridge Agricultural and Biological Index, Science Citation Index, Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science, the Proceedings of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners, World Buiatrics Conference, and the United States Food and Drug Administration Freedom of Information New Animal Drug Applications summaries. The eligible population was weaned beef cattle raised in intensive systems. The interventions of interest were injectable antibiotics used at the time the cattle arrived at the feedlot. The outcome of interest was the diagnosis of BRD within 45 days of arrival at the feedlot. The network meta-analysis included data from 46 studies and 167 study arms identified in the review. The results suggest that macrolides are the most effective antibiotics for the reduction of BRD incidence. Injectable oxytetracycline effectively controlled BRD compared with no antibiotics; however, it was less effective than macrolide treatment. Because oxytetracycline is already commonly used to prevent, control, and treat BRD in groups of feedlot cattle, the use of injectable oxytetracycline for BRD control might have advantages from an antibiotic stewardship perspective.

我们进行了一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析,以确定用于控制饲养场肉牛牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)的抗生素的比较疗效。综述的信息来源为:MEDLINE®、MEDLINE In-Process和MEDLINE®Daily、AGRICOLA、Epub Ahead of Print、剑桥农业与生物指数、科学引文索引、会议论文集引文索引-科学、美国牛从业者协会论文集、世界兽医学会议和美国食品和药物管理局信息自由新动物药物应用摘要。合格的人群是在集约化系统中饲养的断奶肉牛。感兴趣的干预措施是在牛到达饲养场时使用的注射抗生素。感兴趣的结果是在到达饲养场后45天内诊断出BRD。网络荟萃分析包括综述中确定的46项研究和167个研究部门的数据。结果表明,大环内酯类抗生素是降低BRD发病率最有效的抗生素。与不注射抗生素相比,注射土霉素可有效控制BRD;然而,它的效果不如大环内酯治疗。由于土霉素已被普遍用于预防、控制和治疗饲养场牛群中的BRD,从抗生素管理的角度来看,使用注射土霉素控制BRD可能具有优势。
{"title":"A systematic review and network meta-analysis of injectable antibiotic options for the control of bovine respiratory disease in the first 45 days post arrival at the feedlot.","authors":"A M O'Connor, D Hu, S C Totton, N Scott, C B Winder, B Wang, C Wang, J Glanville, H Wood, B White, R Larson, C Waldner, J M Sargeant","doi":"10.1017/S1466252320000031","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1466252320000031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of antibiotics used to control bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in beef cattle on feedlots. The information sources for the review were: MEDLINE®, MEDLINE In-Process and MEDLINE® Daily, AGRICOLA, Epub Ahead of Print, Cambridge Agricultural and Biological Index, Science Citation Index, Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science, the Proceedings of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners, World Buiatrics Conference, and the United States Food and Drug Administration Freedom of Information New Animal Drug Applications summaries. The eligible population was weaned beef cattle raised in intensive systems. The interventions of interest were injectable antibiotics used at the time the cattle arrived at the feedlot. The outcome of interest was the diagnosis of BRD within 45 days of arrival at the feedlot. The network meta-analysis included data from 46 studies and 167 study arms identified in the review. The results suggest that macrolides are the most effective antibiotics for the reduction of BRD incidence. Injectable oxytetracycline effectively controlled BRD compared with no antibiotics; however, it was less effective than macrolide treatment. Because oxytetracycline is already commonly used to prevent, control, and treat BRD in groups of feedlot cattle, the use of injectable oxytetracycline for BRD control might have advantages from an antibiotic stewardship perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 2","pages":"163-181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37663381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative efficacy of antimicrobials for treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. 抗微生物药物治疗泌乳奶牛临床乳腺炎的比较疗效:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
IF 4.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000318
C B Winder, J M Sargeant, D Hu, C Wang, D F Kelton, M A Godkin, K J Churchill, A M O'Connor

A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the relative efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle. Controlled trials in lactating dairy cattle with natural disease exposure were eligible if they compared an antimicrobial treatment to a non-treated control, placebo, or a different antimicrobial, for the treatment of clinical mastitis, and assessed clinical or bacteriologic cure. Potential for bias was assessed using a modified Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. From 14775 initially identified records, 54 trials were assessed as eligible. Networks were established for bacteriologic cure by bacterial species group, and clinical cure. Disparate networks among bacteriologic cures precluded meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis was conducted for trials assessing clinical cure, but lack of precision of point estimates resulted in wide credibility intervals for all treatments, with no definitive conclusions regarding relative efficacy. Consideration of network geometry can inform future research to increase the utility of current and previous work. Replication of intervention arms and consideration of connection to existing networks would improve the future ability to determine relative efficacy. Challenges in the evaluation of bias in primary research stemmed from a lack of reporting. Consideration of reporting guidelines would also improve the utility of future research.

通过系统评价和网络荟萃分析来评估抗菌治疗泌乳奶牛临床乳腺炎的相对疗效。如果将抗菌药物治疗与未治疗的对照组、安慰剂或不同的抗菌药物治疗临床乳腺炎进行比较,并评估临床或细菌学治疗,则对暴露于自然疾病的泌乳奶牛进行对照试验是合格的。使用改进的Cochrane Risk of bias 2.0工具评估潜在偏倚。从最初确定的14775份记录中,54项试验被评估为合格。建立了按菌种分组进行细菌学治疗和临床治疗的网络。不同的细菌治疗网络排除了荟萃分析。对评估临床治愈的试验进行了网络荟萃分析,但由于缺乏精确的点估计,导致所有治疗的可信区间都很宽,没有关于相对疗效的明确结论。考虑网络几何可以为未来的研究提供信息,以提高当前和以前工作的效用。复制干预武器和考虑与现有网络的连接将提高未来确定相对疗效的能力。评估初级研究偏倚的挑战源于缺乏报告。审议报告准则也将提高今后研究的效用。
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of antimicrobials for treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"C B Winder, J M Sargeant, D Hu, C Wang, D F Kelton, M A Godkin, K J Churchill, A M O'Connor","doi":"10.1017/S1466252319000318","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1466252319000318","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the relative efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle. Controlled trials in lactating dairy cattle with natural disease exposure were eligible if they compared an antimicrobial treatment to a non-treated control, placebo, or a different antimicrobial, for the treatment of clinical mastitis, and assessed clinical or bacteriologic cure. Potential for bias was assessed using a modified Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. From 14775 initially identified records, 54 trials were assessed as eligible. Networks were established for bacteriologic cure by bacterial species group, and clinical cure. Disparate networks among bacteriologic cures precluded meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis was conducted for trials assessing clinical cure, but lack of precision of point estimates resulted in wide credibility intervals for all treatments, with no definitive conclusions regarding relative efficacy. Consideration of network geometry can inform future research to increase the utility of current and previous work. Replication of intervention arms and consideration of connection to existing networks would improve the future ability to determine relative efficacy. Challenges in the evaluation of bias in primary research stemmed from a lack of reporting. Consideration of reporting guidelines would also improve the utility of future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 2","pages":"229-246"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37663387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in animal health, performance, and on-farm food safety: a scoping review. 动物健康、生产性能和农场食品安全的系统评价和荟萃分析:范围审查。
IF 4.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000197
Rachael Vriezen, Jan M Sargeant, Ellen Vriezen, Mark Reist, Charlotte B Winder, Annette M O'Connor

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are used to summarize and interpret evidence for clinical decision-making in human health. The extent of the application of these methods in veterinary medicine and animal agriculture is unknown. The goal of this scoping study was to ascertain trends in the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining animal health, animal performance, and on-farm food safety. Online databases were searched for reviews published between 1993 and 2018 that focused on relevant outcomes in domestic livestock, companion animals, or wildlife species. In total 1787 titles and abstracts underwent data characterization. Dairy cattle, fish, and pigs were the most common target commodity groups. Few articles investigated both health and performance outcomes (only health: n = 418; only performance: n = 701; both health and performance: n = 103). Most of the reviews (67.6%, n = 1208/1787) described a meta-analysis but did not state in the title or abstract that a systematic review was also conducted, which is potentially problematic. Adherence to reporting guidelines is recommended for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses. For research areas with many reviews, an evidence repository is recommended. For less well-reviewed areas, additional investigation may be necessary to identify the reasons for the lack of synthesis research.

系统评价和荟萃分析用于总结和解释人类健康临床决策的证据。这些方法在兽医学和畜牧业中的应用程度尚不清楚。本范围研究的目的是确定研究动物健康、动物生产性能和农场食品安全的系统综述和荟萃分析的出版趋势。在线数据库中检索了1993年至2018年间发表的关于家畜、伴侣动物或野生动物物种相关结果的综述。共有1787篇标题和摘要进行了数据表征。奶牛、鱼和猪是最常见的目标商品群体。很少有文章同时调查健康和绩效结果(只有健康:n = 418;仅性能:n = 701;健康和性能:n = 103)。大多数综述(67.6%,n = 1208/1787)描述了荟萃分析,但没有在标题或摘要中说明也进行了系统评价,这是潜在的问题。建议所有系统评价和荟萃分析都遵循报告指南。对于有许多评论的研究领域,建议建立一个证据库。对于评价较差的领域,可能需要进行额外的调查,以确定缺乏合成研究的原因。
{"title":"Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in animal health, performance, and on-farm food safety: a scoping review.","authors":"Rachael Vriezen, Jan M Sargeant, Ellen Vriezen, Mark Reist, Charlotte B Winder, Annette M O'Connor","doi":"10.1017/S1466252319000197","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1466252319000197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are used to summarize and interpret evidence for clinical decision-making in human health. The extent of the application of these methods in veterinary medicine and animal agriculture is unknown. The goal of this scoping study was to ascertain trends in the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining animal health, animal performance, and on-farm food safety. Online databases were searched for reviews published between 1993 and 2018 that focused on relevant outcomes in domestic livestock, companion animals, or wildlife species. In total 1787 titles and abstracts underwent data characterization. Dairy cattle, fish, and pigs were the most common target commodity groups. Few articles investigated both health and performance outcomes (only health: n = 418; only performance: n = 701; both health and performance: n = 103). Most of the reviews (67.6%, n = 1208/1787) described a meta-analysis but did not state in the title or abstract that a systematic review was also conducted, which is potentially problematic. Adherence to reporting guidelines is recommended for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses. For research areas with many reviews, an evidence repository is recommended. For less well-reviewed areas, additional investigation may be necessary to identify the reasons for the lack of synthesis research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 2","pages":"116-127"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37662735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The efficacy of litter management strategies to prevent morbidity and mortality in broiler chickens: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. 产仔管理策略预防肉鸡发病率和死亡率的有效性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
IF 4.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000227
Jan M Sargeant, Michele D Bergevin, Katheryn Churchill, Kaitlyn Dawkins, Bhumika Deb, Jennifer Dunn, Dapeng Hu, Catherine M Logue, Shannon Meadows, Carly Moody, Anastasia Novy, Annette M O'Connor, Mark Reist, Yuko Sato, Chong Wang, Charlotte B Winder

A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to address the question, 'What is the efficacy of litter management strategies to reduce morbidity, mortality, condemnation at slaughter, or total antibiotic use in broilers?' Eligible studies were clinical trials published in English evaluating the efficacy of litter management in broilers on morbidity, condemnations at slaughter, mortality, or total antibiotic use. Multiple databases and two conference proceedings were searched for relevant literature. After relevance screening and data extraction, there were 50 trials evaluating litter type, 22 trials evaluating litter additives, 10 trials comparing fresh to re-used litter, and six trials evaluating floor type. NMAs were conducted for mortality (61 trials) and for the presence or absence of footpad lesions (15 trials). There were no differences in mortality among the litter types, floor types, or additives. For footpad lesions, peat moss appeared beneficial compared to straw, based on a small number of comparisons. In a pairwise meta-analysis, there was no association between fresh versus used litter on the risk of mortality, although there was considerable heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 66%). There was poor reporting of key design features in many studies, and analyses rarely accounted for non-independence of observations within flocks.

我们进行了一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析(NMA)来解决这个问题,“产仔管理策略在降低肉鸡发病率、死亡率、屠宰时的死亡率或抗生素总使用量方面的功效如何?”符合条件的研究是用英文发表的临床试验,评估肉鸡产仔管理对发病率、屠宰谴责、死亡率或总抗生素使用的有效性。检索了多个数据库和两个会议论文集,以查找相关文献。经过相关性筛选和数据提取,有50项试验评估凋落物类型,22项试验评估凋落物添加剂,10项试验比较新鲜凋落物和再利用凋落物,6项试验评估地板类型。对死亡率(61项试验)和足部病变的存在与否(15项试验)进行了nma。不同凋落物类型、地板类型和添加剂的死亡率没有差异。根据少量的比较,对于脚垫病变,泥炭苔藓与稻草相比似乎是有益的。在两两荟萃分析中,尽管研究之间存在相当大的异质性(I2 = 66%),但未发现新鲜和用过的落叶与死亡风险之间存在关联。在许多研究中,对关键设计特征的报道很差,分析很少考虑到群内观察的非独立性。
{"title":"The efficacy of litter management strategies to prevent morbidity and mortality in broiler chickens: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Jan M Sargeant, Michele D Bergevin, Katheryn Churchill, Kaitlyn Dawkins, Bhumika Deb, Jennifer Dunn, Dapeng Hu, Catherine M Logue, Shannon Meadows, Carly Moody, Anastasia Novy, Annette M O'Connor, Mark Reist, Yuko Sato, Chong Wang, Charlotte B Winder","doi":"10.1017/S1466252319000227","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1466252319000227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to address the question, 'What is the efficacy of litter management strategies to reduce morbidity, mortality, condemnation at slaughter, or total antibiotic use in broilers?' Eligible studies were clinical trials published in English evaluating the efficacy of litter management in broilers on morbidity, condemnations at slaughter, mortality, or total antibiotic use. Multiple databases and two conference proceedings were searched for relevant literature. After relevance screening and data extraction, there were 50 trials evaluating litter type, 22 trials evaluating litter additives, 10 trials comparing fresh to re-used litter, and six trials evaluating floor type. NMAs were conducted for mortality (61 trials) and for the presence or absence of footpad lesions (15 trials). There were no differences in mortality among the litter types, floor types, or additives. For footpad lesions, peat moss appeared beneficial compared to straw, based on a small number of comparisons. In a pairwise meta-analysis, there was no association between fresh versus used litter on the risk of mortality, although there was considerable heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 66%). There was poor reporting of key design features in many studies, and analyses rarely accounted for non-independence of observations within flocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 2","pages":"247-262"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37663276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A review of traditional and machine learning methods applied to animal breeding. 回顾传统和机器学习方法在动物育种中的应用。
IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000148
Shadi Nayeri, Mehdi Sargolzaei, Dan Tulpan

The current livestock management landscape is transitioning to a high-throughput digital era where large amounts of information captured by systems of electro-optical, acoustical, mechanical, and biosensors is stored and analyzed on a daily and hourly basis, and actionable decisions are made based on quantitative and qualitative analytic results. While traditional animal breeding prediction methods have been used with great success until recently, the deluge of information starts to create a computational and storage bottleneck that could lead to negative long-term impacts on herd management strategies if not handled properly. A plethora of machine learning approaches, successfully used in various industrial and scientific applications, made their way in the mainstream approaches for livestock breeding techniques, and current results show that such methods have the potential to match or surpass the traditional approaches, while most of the time they are more scalable from a computational and storage perspective. This article provides a succinct view on what traditional and novel prediction methods are currently used in the livestock breeding field, how successful they are, and how the future of the field looks in the new digital agriculture era.

当前的畜牧业管理格局正在向高通量数字时代过渡,在这个时代,光电、声学、机械和生物传感器系统捕获的大量信息每天和每小时被存储和分析,并根据定量和定性分析结果做出可操作的决策。虽然直到最近,传统的动物育种预测方法已经取得了巨大的成功,但大量的信息开始造成计算和存储瓶颈,如果处理不当,可能会对畜群管理策略产生负面的长期影响。大量的机器学习方法,成功地应用于各种工业和科学应用,在牲畜育种技术的主流方法中取得了进展,目前的结果表明,这些方法有可能匹配或超越传统方法,而大多数时候,从计算和存储的角度来看,它们更具可扩展性。本文简要介绍了目前在畜禽养殖领域使用的传统和新型预测方法,以及它们的成功程度,以及在新的数字农业时代该领域的未来。
{"title":"A review of traditional and machine learning methods applied to animal breeding.","authors":"Shadi Nayeri,&nbsp;Mehdi Sargolzaei,&nbsp;Dan Tulpan","doi":"10.1017/S1466252319000148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252319000148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current livestock management landscape is transitioning to a high-throughput digital era where large amounts of information captured by systems of electro-optical, acoustical, mechanical, and biosensors is stored and analyzed on a daily and hourly basis, and actionable decisions are made based on quantitative and qualitative analytic results. While traditional animal breeding prediction methods have been used with great success until recently, the deluge of information starts to create a computational and storage bottleneck that could lead to negative long-term impacts on herd management strategies if not handled properly. A plethora of machine learning approaches, successfully used in various industrial and scientific applications, made their way in the mainstream approaches for livestock breeding techniques, and current results show that such methods have the potential to match or surpass the traditional approaches, while most of the time they are more scalable from a computational and storage perspective. This article provides a succinct view on what traditional and novel prediction methods are currently used in the livestock breeding field, how successful they are, and how the future of the field looks in the new digital agriculture era.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":"31-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1466252319000148","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37506908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Non-antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing intramammary infections in dairy cows. Part 1. Meta-analyses of efficacy of using an internal teat sealant without a concomitant antimicrobial treatment. 用于治疗和预防奶牛乳腺内感染的非抗菌干燥方法。第1部分。使用内乳头密封剂而不同时进行抗菌治疗的疗效荟萃分析。
IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-11-26 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000070
Simon Dufour, Vincent Wellemans, Jean-Philippe Roy, Pierre Lacasse, Alfredo Ordonez-Iturriaga, David Francoz

Use of antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period in dairy cows could be replaced by non-antimicrobial approaches. Such approaches would be of interest not only for organic but also for conventional dairy producers. The objective of the current review was to quantify the effect of non-antimicrobial internal teat sealant (ITS)-based approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing IMI, when compared with no treatment or with an antimicrobial-based approach. The protocol for this review was published before initiating the review. A total of 18 trials from 16 articles could be used to investigate the effect of an ITS-based approach. With the available results, we conclude with a high level of confidence that non-antimicrobial ITS-based dry-off approaches are efficient for preventing new IMI during the dry period when compared with no treatment, and would reduce risk of new IMI by 52%. Moreover, we are relatively confident that a bismuth subnitrate-based ITS performed better than an antimicrobial for preventing new IMI during the dry period (a risk reduction of 23%). Similarly, we are relatively confident that an ITS-based approach would only slightly or not at all reduce the prevalence of IMI at calving compared with untreated quarters.

在奶牛干燥期使用抗菌方法预防新的乳内感染(IMI)可被非抗菌方法所取代。这样的方法不仅对有机乳制品生产商有好处,对传统乳制品生产商也有好处。本综述的目的是量化非抗菌内乳头密封剂(ITS)为基础的干燥方法治疗和预防IMI的效果,与不治疗或以抗菌为基础的方法进行比较。本综述的方案在综述开始前已发表。来自16篇文章的总共18项试验可用于研究基于its的方法的效果。根据现有的结果,我们高度自信地得出结论,与不进行治疗相比,基于非抗菌its的干燥方法在干燥期预防新的IMI是有效的,并且可以将新的IMI风险降低52%。此外,我们相对有信心,亚硝酸盐铋基ITS在干燥期预防新的IMI方面比抗菌剂表现更好(风险降低23%)。同样,我们相对有信心,与未治疗的季度相比,基于its的方法只会略微或根本不会降低产犊期IMI的患病率。
{"title":"Non-antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing intramammary infections in dairy cows. Part 1. Meta-analyses of efficacy of using an internal teat sealant without a concomitant antimicrobial treatment.","authors":"Simon Dufour,&nbsp;Vincent Wellemans,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Roy,&nbsp;Pierre Lacasse,&nbsp;Alfredo Ordonez-Iturriaga,&nbsp;David Francoz","doi":"10.1017/S1466252319000070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252319000070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Use of antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period in dairy cows could be replaced by non-antimicrobial approaches. Such approaches would be of interest not only for organic but also for conventional dairy producers. The objective of the current review was to quantify the effect of non-antimicrobial internal teat sealant (ITS)-based approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing IMI, when compared with no treatment or with an antimicrobial-based approach. The protocol for this review was published before initiating the review. A total of 18 trials from 16 articles could be used to investigate the effect of an ITS-based approach. With the available results, we conclude with a high level of confidence that non-antimicrobial ITS-based dry-off approaches are efficient for preventing new IMI during the dry period when compared with no treatment, and would reduce risk of new IMI by 52%. Moreover, we are relatively confident that a bismuth subnitrate-based ITS performed better than an antimicrobial for preventing new IMI during the dry period (a risk reduction of 23%). Similarly, we are relatively confident that an ITS-based approach would only slightly or not at all reduce the prevalence of IMI at calving compared with untreated quarters.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":"86-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1466252319000070","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37506315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Prospects for predictive modeling of transition cow diseases. 过渡牛疾病预测模型的发展前景。
IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-09-16 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000112
Lauren Wisnieski, Bo Norby, Steven J Pierce, Tyler Becker, Lorraine M Sordillo

Transition cow diseases can negatively impact animal welfare and reduce dairy herd profitability. Transition cow disease incidence has remained relatively stable over time despite monitoring and management efforts aimed to reduce the risk of developing diseases. Dairy cattle disease risk is monitored by assessing multiple factors, including certain biomarker test results, health records, feed intake, body condition score, and milk production. However, these factors, which are used to make herd management decisions, are often reviewed separately without considering the correlation between them. In addition, the biomarkers that are currently used for monitoring may not be representative of the complex physiological changes that occur during the transition period. Predictive modeling, which uses data to predict future or current outcomes, is a method that can be used to combine the most predictive variables and their interactions efficiently. The use of an effective predictive model with relevant predictors for transition cow diseases will result in better targeted interventions, and therefore lower disease incidence. This review will discuss predictive modeling methods and candidate variables in the context of transition cow diseases. The next step is to investigate novel biomarkers and statistical methods that are best suited for the prediction of transition cow diseases.

过渡性奶牛疾病会对动物福利产生负面影响,降低奶牛群的盈利能力。尽管监测和管理工作旨在降低患病风险,但过渡牛的发病率一直保持相对稳定。通过评估多种因素来监测奶牛疾病风险,包括某些生物标志物测试结果、健康记录、采食量、身体状况评分和产奶量。然而,这些用于制定畜群管理决策的因素往往被单独审查,而不考虑它们之间的相关性。此外,目前用于监测的生物标志物可能不能代表在过渡时期发生的复杂生理变化。预测建模是一种利用数据预测未来或当前结果的方法,它可以有效地将最具预测性的变量及其相互作用结合起来。使用具有相关预测因子的有效预测模型,可以更好地进行有针对性的干预,从而降低疾病发病率。本文将讨论过渡牛疾病的预测建模方法和候选变量。下一步是研究最适合预测过渡性奶牛疾病的新型生物标志物和统计方法。
{"title":"Prospects for predictive modeling of transition cow diseases.","authors":"Lauren Wisnieski,&nbsp;Bo Norby,&nbsp;Steven J Pierce,&nbsp;Tyler Becker,&nbsp;Lorraine M Sordillo","doi":"10.1017/S1466252319000112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252319000112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transition cow diseases can negatively impact animal welfare and reduce dairy herd profitability. Transition cow disease incidence has remained relatively stable over time despite monitoring and management efforts aimed to reduce the risk of developing diseases. Dairy cattle disease risk is monitored by assessing multiple factors, including certain biomarker test results, health records, feed intake, body condition score, and milk production. However, these factors, which are used to make herd management decisions, are often reviewed separately without considering the correlation between them. In addition, the biomarkers that are currently used for monitoring may not be representative of the complex physiological changes that occur during the transition period. Predictive modeling, which uses data to predict future or current outcomes, is a method that can be used to combine the most predictive variables and their interactions efficiently. The use of an effective predictive model with relevant predictors for transition cow diseases will result in better targeted interventions, and therefore lower disease incidence. This review will discuss predictive modeling methods and candidate variables in the context of transition cow diseases. The next step is to investigate novel biomarkers and statistical methods that are best suited for the prediction of transition cow diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":"19-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1466252319000112","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37506909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
A scoping review of 'big data', 'informatics', and 'bioinformatics' in the animal health and veterinary medical literature. 对动物健康和兽医医学文献中的“大数据”、“信息学”和“生物信息学”进行范围审查。
IF 4.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000136
Zenhwa Ouyang, Jan Sargeant, Alison Thomas, Kate Wycherley, Rebecca Ma, Rosa Esmaeilbeigi, Ali Versluis, Deborah Stacey, Elizabeth Stone, Zvonimir Poljak, Theresa M Bernardo

Research in big data, informatics, and bioinformatics has grown dramatically (Andreu-Perez J, et al., 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 19, 1193-1208). Advances in gene sequencing technologies, surveillance systems, and electronic medical records have increased the amount of health data available. Unconventional data sources such as social media, wearable sensors, and internet search engine activity have also contributed to the influx of health data. The purpose of this study was to describe how 'big data', 'informatics', and 'bioinformatics' have been used in the animal health and veterinary medical literature and to map and chart publications using these terms through time. A scoping review methodology was used. A literature search of the terms 'big data', 'informatics', and 'bioinformatics' was conducted in the context of animal health and veterinary medicine. Relevance screening on abstract and full-text was conducted sequentially. In order for articles to be relevant, they must have used the words 'big data', 'informatics', or 'bioinformatics' in the title or abstract and full-text and have dealt with one of the major animal species encountered in veterinary medicine. Data items collected for all relevant articles included species, geographic region, first author affiliation, and journal of publication. The study level, study type, and data sources were collected for primary studies. After relevance screening, 1093 were classified. While there was a steady increase in 'bioinformatics' articles between 1995 and the end of the study period, 'informatics' articles reached their peak in 2012, then declined. The first 'big data' publication in animal health and veterinary medicine was in 2012. While few articles used the term 'big data' (n = 14), recent growth in 'big data' articles was observed. All geographic regions produced publications in 'informatics' and 'bioinformatics' while only North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia/Oceania produced publications about 'big data'. 'Bioinformatics' primary studies tended to use genetic data and tended to be conducted at the genetic level. In contrast, 'informatics' primary studies tended to use non-genetic data sources and conducted at an organismal level. The rapidly evolving definition of 'big data' may lead to avoidance of the term.

(Andreu-Perez J, et ., 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health informatics, 19, 1193-1208)。基因测序技术、监测系统和电子医疗记录的进步增加了可用健康数据的数量。社交媒体、可穿戴传感器和互联网搜索引擎活动等非常规数据源也促成了健康数据的涌入。本研究的目的是描述“大数据”、“信息学”和“生物信息学”是如何在动物健康和兽医医学文献中使用的,并对使用这些术语的出版物进行绘制和图表。使用了范围审查方法。在动物健康和兽医学的背景下,对“大数据”、“信息学”和“生物信息学”这三个术语进行了文献检索。按顺序对摘要和全文进行相关性筛选。为了使文章具有相关性,他们必须在标题或摘要和全文中使用“大数据”、“信息学”或“生物信息学”等词,并且涉及兽医学中遇到的主要动物物种之一。收集的所有相关文章的数据项目包括物种、地理区域、第一作者隶属关系和出版期刊。收集了初步研究的研究水平、研究类型和数据来源。经相关性筛选,分类1093例。虽然从1995年到研究期结束,“生物信息学”的文章稳步增加,但“信息学”的文章在2012年达到顶峰,然后下降。2012年,动物健康和兽医领域首次发表了“大数据”出版物。虽然很少有文章使用“大数据”一词(n = 14),但我们观察到最近“大数据”文章的增长。所有地理区域都出版了“信息学”和“生物信息学”方面的出版物,而只有北美、欧洲、亚洲和澳大利亚/大洋洲出版了关于“大数据”的出版物。“生物信息学”的初级研究倾向于使用遗传数据,并倾向于在遗传水平上进行。相比之下,“信息学”初级研究倾向于使用非遗传数据源,并在生物体水平上进行。“大数据”定义的快速演变可能会导致人们回避这个术语。
{"title":"A scoping review of 'big data', 'informatics', and 'bioinformatics' in the animal health and veterinary medical literature.","authors":"Zenhwa Ouyang, Jan Sargeant, Alison Thomas, Kate Wycherley, Rebecca Ma, Rosa Esmaeilbeigi, Ali Versluis, Deborah Stacey, Elizabeth Stone, Zvonimir Poljak, Theresa M Bernardo","doi":"10.1017/S1466252319000136","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1466252319000136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research in big data, informatics, and bioinformatics has grown dramatically (Andreu-Perez J, et al., 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 19, 1193-1208). Advances in gene sequencing technologies, surveillance systems, and electronic medical records have increased the amount of health data available. Unconventional data sources such as social media, wearable sensors, and internet search engine activity have also contributed to the influx of health data. The purpose of this study was to describe how 'big data', 'informatics', and 'bioinformatics' have been used in the animal health and veterinary medical literature and to map and chart publications using these terms through time. A scoping review methodology was used. A literature search of the terms 'big data', 'informatics', and 'bioinformatics' was conducted in the context of animal health and veterinary medicine. Relevance screening on abstract and full-text was conducted sequentially. In order for articles to be relevant, they must have used the words 'big data', 'informatics', or 'bioinformatics' in the title or abstract and full-text and have dealt with one of the major animal species encountered in veterinary medicine. Data items collected for all relevant articles included species, geographic region, first author affiliation, and journal of publication. The study level, study type, and data sources were collected for primary studies. After relevance screening, 1093 were classified. While there was a steady increase in 'bioinformatics' articles between 1995 and the end of the study period, 'informatics' articles reached their peak in 2012, then declined. The first 'big data' publication in animal health and veterinary medicine was in 2012. While few articles used the term 'big data' (n = 14), recent growth in 'big data' articles was observed. All geographic regions produced publications in 'informatics' and 'bioinformatics' while only North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia/Oceania produced publications about 'big data'. 'Bioinformatics' primary studies tended to use genetic data and tended to be conducted at the genetic level. In contrast, 'informatics' primary studies tended to use non-genetic data sources and conducted at an organismal level. The rapidly evolving definition of 'big data' may lead to avoidance of the term.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37506912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AHR volume 20 issue 1 Cover and Front matter AHR第20卷第1期封面和封面问题
IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/s146625231900032x
{"title":"AHR volume 20 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/s146625231900032x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s146625231900032x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":"f1 - f1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s146625231900032x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48689923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Animal Health Research Reviews
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1