Gerontologist最新文献

Hearing loss affects an estimated 18 million UK adults and is the third leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Hearing loss diminishes quality of life, activities of daily living, mental health, and negatively impacts the economy. When left unaddressed, hearing loss exacerbates health inequalities and is associated with an increased risk of developing dementia. Hearing loss and dementia frequently co-occur and have overlapping risk factors. People from disadvantaged backgrounds typically access hearing and memory services at a more progressed stage of their conditions. Early intervention is essential to mitigate negative effects and reduce disease burden. Universal adult hearing screening is not currently recommended by the UK National Screening Committee, despite evidence of cost-effectiveness and international recommendations. We argue that the UK should adopt targeted, risk-stratified screening that prioritises those at greatest risk of dementia and people in deprived communities, where unmet need is highest. Such an approach is practical, equitable, and consistent with the Governments' prevention and personalised care agenda set out in the 10-year Health Plan for England. We outline the evidence, discuss implementation pathways, and call on policymakers to commission a targeted, risk-stratified adult hearing screening pilot. A successful programme would address unmet need, reduce inequalities, and further inform global debates on hearing screening strategies.

Background and objectives: Falls are a leading cause of injury and death among older adults (65+). The CDC's STEADI initiative aims to reduce falls by screening to find at-risk individuals, evaluation, and then addressing modifiable risk factors. This study evaluated the effectiveness of implementing a STEADI-based multi-component fall prevention approach via telemedicine in primary care.

Research design and methods: A randomized controlled quality improvement trial (STEADI Options) was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (07/2020-12/2021). Primary care professionals (PCPs) were randomized to either standard-of-care (SOC) or intervention. The intervention included a fall risk assessment by a research nurse, who shared STEADI-based recommendations with PCPs. Recommended interventions were administered at the discretion of PCPs. Outcomes included self-reported falls (primary), medically treated falls, fall-related service utilization (physical therapy, occupational therapy, eye care, podiatry), and medication changes, assessed over one year. Analyses followed an intent-to-treat approach.

Results: Among 660 participants (353 SOC; 307 intervention), the cohort was predominantly female (67.7%), aged 65-79 (73.6%), and non-Hispanic White (56.1%). Intervention participants had higher average Stay Independent Screener (SIS) scores (6.3 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Overall, 5.5% reported a fall in the past 12 months. No significant differences were observed between groups in fall-related outcomes (e.g., medically treated falls odds ratio (adjusted for SIS): 0.741; 95% CI: 0.411-1.336).

Discussion and implications: Although no significant differences were found, limited recruitment, low baseline fall rates, and unmeasured adherence may have impacted results. Further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine-based STEADI interventions in primary care.

Background and objectives: Emerging public health discourse increasingly frames brain health and dementia prevention as matters of personal responsibility and urge individuals to adopt modifiable behaviours across the life course. This study examines how adults at different life stages perceive dementia risk and engage with brain health practices, with particular attention to how these behaviours are socially structured and culturally mediated.

Research design and methods: Using a life course perspective and an abductive critical realist approach, this qualitative study draws on semi-structured interviews with 33 participants (aged 19-81) recruited across three generational cohorts: younger adults (n = 11), middle-aged adults (n = 8), and older adults (n = 14). Abductive thematic analysis was employed to examine how participants understand brain health, dementia, and responsibility for the management and prevention of these aspects of late-life health.

Results: Participants articulated diverse and age-contingent understandings of brain health. While younger adults associated prevention with aspirational self-optimisation, middle-aged adults emphasised routine, sustainability and caregiving-informed insight. Older adults, often informed by lived proximity to dementia, described adaptive strategies to preserve brain health amidst physical limitations. Across all groups, health practices were framed through an ethos of personal accountability, though often enacted within structurally constrained contexts.

Discussion and implications: Findings emphasise the need to critically engage with how dementia prevention discourse is differentially internalised across the life course. Public health strategies should balance behavioural interventions with honest acknowledgement of the structural conditions which stratify distributions of brain health risk and opportunities for prevention.

In 2005, congressional support led to the creation of the Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI) and the collaboration between the Alzheimer's Association and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prioritize brain health in public health practice. Over 20 years, the HBI has developed and implemented the HBI Road Map Series to increase the capacity of health departments to integrate dementia into health departments nationwide, aligning frameworks like the Essential Public Health Services and focusing on health equity across the life course. A growing number of HBI partners now work together to implement public health strategies that promote brain health, address dementia, and support people living with dementia and caregivers. Recognizing opportunities to influence the trajectory of public health action, the HBI prioritizes growing the availability and use of dementia-related public health data and equipping the public health workforce with the knowledge and confidence to make change. This article documents the history and evolution of the HBI, including a description of current efforts and the broader public health context to which it has contributed; efforts of the HBI and partners in national, state, local, territorial, and tribal public health agencies have led to transformative change.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded Building Our Largest Dementia (BOLD) Infrastructure's Public Health Center of Excellence on Dementia Caregiving (PHCOE-DC) is one of three national centers designed to help public health departments strengthen and grow their Alzheimer's disease and related dementia initiatives. The PHCOE-DC specializes in disseminating tools and resources to help public health agencies develop programming and partnerships that support family caregivers of individuals with dementia. Through its reach and dissemination efforts, the PHCOE-DC has helped to elevate dementia caregiving as a priority for public health departments. Since 2020, the PHCOE-DC has increased visibility for the role of public health in strengthening the support infrastructure for family caregivers of individuals with dementia and has established a network of national leaders in dementia caregiving. This article summarizes PHCOE-DC's past work and potential future activities as the Center continues to elevate dementia caregiving as a priority for public health.

In 2017, the United States Senate Special Committee on Aging added public health to the Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) policy platform by introducing the Building Our Largest Dementia Infrastructure for Alzheimer's Act. Since then, 34 state health departments, 7 local, 2 territorial, and 1 tribal health organization have received a BOLD Program award from the Centers for Disease Control. With the support of the Alzheimer's Association and university-based Centers of Excellence, their efforts have increased public awareness, expanded training of health-care providers, linked public health programs and health-care systems, and supported programs to reduce the risk for ADRD. In this forum, we draw on examples of federal and state policymaking targeting persons living with dementia and demonstrate how iron triangles consisting of advocacy organizations, public servants and policymakers have been critical in building a public policy platform for more than 50 years. We then consider how public health leadership may rely on such iron triangles to expand their role, focusing on the critical role assumed by professional and academic organizations in educating and training those who may help respond to the public health crisis being presented by the booming number of older Americans with ADRD.

While American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian (AI/AN/NH) populations have disproportionately been affected by dementia, these communities are resilient and offer critical insight about dementia and brain health through the aging process. Existing dementia education often neglects cultural nuances and realities that influence health beliefs and practices in these communities, focusing on disparities or erasing Native experiences entirely. This article highlights the importance and impact of culturally tailoring dementia education, serving as a call to action for providers, policymakers, and partners to consider the needs of AI/AN/NH communities when addressing dementia. As the only Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded AI/AN Resource Center for Brain Health, the International Association for Indigenous Aging (IA2) has employed a multifaceted, strength-based approach for effectively engaging with and supporting Native populations in addressing disparities in dementia and brain health. This approach enables the co-creation of inclusive, impactful dementia education resources that resonate with AI/AN/NH populations. IA2's work underscores the importance of integrating community engagement, Indigenous knowledge, and traditional practice into public health frameworks to address the complex challenges dementia poses in Native communities.

Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) face disproportionately high rates of chronic conditions, including an elevated risk for dementia. Yet access to appropriate brain health promotion and dementia care remains limited due to stigma, underdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, and systemic barriers. This article presents the Healthy Brain Initiative for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (HBI-PwIDD), which aims to (1) raise awareness of brain health and support health-promoting approaches for people with IDD experiencing Alzheimer's disease and related dementias; (2) build interprofessional partnerships to develop an inclusive, competent workforce; and (3) strengthen engagement of people with IDD and their supporters in accessing quality healthcare and improving outcomes. Applying a disability intersectionality lens, we integrate brain health promotion with dementia-capable services, emphasizing the critical role of disability-inclusive public health planning. We highlight person-centered approaches grounded in legal and human rights principles that provide access to brain health care and community-based supports. Finally, we discuss how tailored public health messaging and evidence-based workforce strategies can advance national and state brain health and dementia plans and improve equity in care for individuals with IDD. This paper illustrates how integrating disability-inclusive practices within public health systems can promote inclusive aging, improve dementia-related outcomes, and guide gerontologists in building inclusive, life course-oriented models of care.