首页 > 最新文献

Gerontologist最新文献

英文 中文
Tools for Dementia Disclosure: A Systematic Review of Family Caregivers' Perspectives and Experiences. 痴呆症披露的工具:对家庭照顾者的观点和经验的系统回顾。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf301
Howard Haochu Li, Wilson Wing Chung Tang, Heman Lok Hei Leung, Zesen Gao, Kitman Chan, Vivian Weiqun Lou

Background and objectives: This review focuses on tools used in dementia diagnostic disclosure, particularly from family caregivers' perspectives. With dementia affecting millions globally, caregivers face challenges needing clear information and assistance. The review aims to: (a) identify tools used, (b) assess caregivers' preferences and challenges, and (c) highlight gaps to enhance communication strategies in dementia care.

Research design and methods: This systematic review, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024557806), synthesized evidence from nine studies on tools for dementia disclosure, with a focus on family caregiver perspectives. A comprehensive search of eight databases up to September 16, 2025, combined LLM-assisted screening and human review to identify qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. Thematic synthesis analyzed caregiver preferences, tool effectiveness, and practice gaps.

Results: Across five countries (UK, Australia, USA, Denmark, Netherlands), written materials were universally valued (e.g., 80-95% satisfaction), with visual aids and brain images less common but effective when used. Caregivers preferred direct, comprehensive information (e.g., 98% sought details about behavior and psychological symptoms of dementia) delivered face-to-face, with written backups, although retention challenges (e.g., 61% recall) and inconsistent tool provision persisted. Gaps included limited visual aid adoption and poor post-diagnostic support, highlighting unmet needs.

Discussion and implications: This review highlights the importance of tools in supporting caregivers during dementia disclosure and calls for the development of a standardized Dementia Disclosure Evaluation Tool. Despite limitations (e.g., small sample sizes, urban bias), the findings lay the groundwork for improving caregiver support and guiding future research in diverse contexts.

背景和目的:本综述的重点是用于痴呆症诊断披露的工具,特别是从家庭照顾者的角度。由于痴呆症影响着全球数百万人,护理人员面临着需要明确信息和援助的挑战。审查的目的是:(a)确定所使用的工具,(b)评估照顾者的偏好和挑战,以及(c)强调加强痴呆症护理沟通策略的差距。研究设计和方法:本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024557806),综合了9项关于痴呆症披露工具的研究的证据,重点关注家庭照顾者的观点。到2025年9月16日,对8个数据库进行全面搜索,结合法学硕士辅助筛选和人工审查,以确定定性,定量和混合方法研究。专题综合分析了护理人员的偏好、工具有效性和实践差距。结果:在五个国家(英国、澳大利亚、美国、丹麦、荷兰),书面材料被普遍重视(例如,80-95%的满意度),视觉辅助和脑图像不太常见,但使用时有效。护理人员更喜欢面对面提供直接、全面的信息(例如,98%的人寻求有关痴呆症行为和心理症状的细节),并提供书面备份,尽管记忆方面的挑战(例如,61%的人回忆)和不一致的工具提供仍然存在。差距包括有限的视觉辅助设备采用和诊断后支持不足,突出了未满足的需求。讨论和意义:本综述强调了在痴呆症披露过程中支持护理人员的工具的重要性,并呼吁开发标准化的痴呆症披露评估工具。尽管存在局限性(例如样本量小,城市偏见),但研究结果为改善护理人员支持和指导未来在不同背景下的研究奠定了基础。
{"title":"Tools for Dementia Disclosure: A Systematic Review of Family Caregivers' Perspectives and Experiences.","authors":"Howard Haochu Li, Wilson Wing Chung Tang, Heman Lok Hei Leung, Zesen Gao, Kitman Chan, Vivian Weiqun Lou","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf301","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This review focuses on tools used in dementia diagnostic disclosure, particularly from family caregivers' perspectives. With dementia affecting millions globally, caregivers face challenges needing clear information and assistance. The review aims to: (a) identify tools used, (b) assess caregivers' preferences and challenges, and (c) highlight gaps to enhance communication strategies in dementia care.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This systematic review, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024557806), synthesized evidence from nine studies on tools for dementia disclosure, with a focus on family caregiver perspectives. A comprehensive search of eight databases up to September 16, 2025, combined LLM-assisted screening and human review to identify qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. Thematic synthesis analyzed caregiver preferences, tool effectiveness, and practice gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across five countries (UK, Australia, USA, Denmark, Netherlands), written materials were universally valued (e.g., 80-95% satisfaction), with visual aids and brain images less common but effective when used. Caregivers preferred direct, comprehensive information (e.g., 98% sought details about behavior and psychological symptoms of dementia) delivered face-to-face, with written backups, although retention challenges (e.g., 61% recall) and inconsistent tool provision persisted. Gaps included limited visual aid adoption and poor post-diagnostic support, highlighting unmet needs.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This review highlights the importance of tools in supporting caregivers during dementia disclosure and calls for the development of a standardized Dementia Disclosure Evaluation Tool. Despite limitations (e.g., small sample sizes, urban bias), the findings lay the groundwork for improving caregiver support and guiding future research in diverse contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prediction of safety accident subtypes for persons with dementia using sensors and machine learning: an observational study. 使用传感器和机器学习预测痴呆症患者的安全事故亚型:一项观察性研究。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf313
Eunjin Yang, Ji Yeon Lee, YeonKyu Choi, SungHee Lee, YoonHyung Jang, Aeyoung Cho, Kyung Hee Lee

Background and objectives: We explored the use of machine learning models for predicting safety accident subtypes among individuals with dementia using in-home sensors and to identify key predictors.

Research design and methods: An observational study was conducted using 966 days of in-home sensor data, sleep data from wearable Actiwatch devices, caregiver-completed structured safety accident diary data, and individual data collected in South Korea. Five machine learning classification models were developed to predict physical injury, nighttime behaviors/wandering, and risky behaviors. Model performance was compared, and the most important predictive features were extracted.

Results: The Gradient Boosting Model showed the best performance in predicting physical injury and nighttime behaviors, while CatBoost performed best for risky behaviors. Activity patterns recorded using in-home sensors emerged as essential features for predicting different safety accident subgroups, particularly for nighttime behaviors and wandering.

Discussion and implications: These findings highlight the potential of these technologies to identify high-risk individuals with dementia. Further research is recommended to integrate these methods for daily safety monitoring of this population.

背景和目的:我们探索了使用机器学习模型来使用家庭传感器预测痴呆症患者的安全事故亚型,并确定关键预测因素。研究设计和方法:一项观察性研究使用966天的家庭传感器数据、来自可穿戴Actiwatch设备的睡眠数据、护理人员完成的结构化安全事故日记数据和韩国收集的个人数据。开发了五种机器学习分类模型来预测身体伤害、夜间行为/游荡和危险行为。比较模型性能,提取最重要的预测特征。结果:梯度增强模型在预测身体伤害和夜间行为方面表现最好,而CatBoost模型在预测危险行为方面表现最好。使用家庭传感器记录的活动模式成为预测不同安全事故亚组的基本特征,特别是夜间行为和漫游。讨论和启示:这些发现强调了这些技术在识别高风险痴呆症患者方面的潜力。建议进行进一步的研究,将这些方法整合起来,对这一人群进行日常安全监测。
{"title":"Prediction of safety accident subtypes for persons with dementia using sensors and machine learning: an observational study.","authors":"Eunjin Yang, Ji Yeon Lee, YeonKyu Choi, SungHee Lee, YoonHyung Jang, Aeyoung Cho, Kyung Hee Lee","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf313","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We explored the use of machine learning models for predicting safety accident subtypes among individuals with dementia using in-home sensors and to identify key predictors.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted using 966 days of in-home sensor data, sleep data from wearable Actiwatch devices, caregiver-completed structured safety accident diary data, and individual data collected in South Korea. Five machine learning classification models were developed to predict physical injury, nighttime behaviors/wandering, and risky behaviors. Model performance was compared, and the most important predictive features were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Gradient Boosting Model showed the best performance in predicting physical injury and nighttime behaviors, while CatBoost performed best for risky behaviors. Activity patterns recorded using in-home sensors emerged as essential features for predicting different safety accident subgroups, particularly for nighttime behaviors and wandering.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>These findings highlight the potential of these technologies to identify high-risk individuals with dementia. Further research is recommended to integrate these methods for daily safety monitoring of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Bed Sensor Technology: Interdisciplinary Insights in a Geriatric Assessment Inpatient Setting. 探索床上传感器技术:跨学科的见解在老年评估住院设置。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf312
Yong Zhao, Cromwell G Acosta, Yayan Ye, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Joanna Lawrence, Michelle Towell, Heather D'Oyley, Marion Mackay-Dunn, Bryan Chow, Lillian Hung

Background and objectives: Sleep quality is a critical component of health and recovery for hospitalized older adults, yet current monitoring practices often lack the precision and detail required for effective intervention. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance of implementing the artificial intelligence-powered Sleepsense bed sensor for sleep monitoring in a geriatric inpatient hospital setting.

Research design and methods: This qualitative study involved interviews with 22 patients and focus groups with 33 interdisciplinary staff members. Data were analyzed using an interpretive description approach, guided by the technology acceptance model and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, to explore the feasibility and acceptance of Sleepsense bed sensors in a geriatric inpatient setting.

Results: Key findings from thematic analysis emerged in three main themes representing the feasibility and acceptance of Sleepsense bed sensors among hospitalized older adults: user acceptance, integration with somnolog into clinical practice, and implementation barriers and practical challenges. Staff reported high acceptance of Sleepsense technology due to its nonintrusiveness and ability to reduce disruptive nighttime checks. However, challenges such as the need for consent, data interpretation, and occasional inaccuracies were also identified. Integrating Sleepsense with existing care practices was recommended to enhance patient care while maintaining staff confidence.

Discussion and implications: This study underscores the potential of advanced sleep monitoring technologies in subacute care settings and highlights the importance of addressing implementation barriers for effective adoption.

背景和目的:睡眠质量是住院老年人健康和康复的关键组成部分,但目前的监测实践往往缺乏有效干预所需的准确性和细节。本定性研究旨在评估人工智能驱动的Sleepsense床上传感器在老年住院医院中用于睡眠监测的可行性和可接受性。研究设计和方法:本定性研究包括对22名患者的访谈和33名跨学科工作人员的焦点小组。在技术接受模型和技术接受与使用统一理论的指导下,采用解释性描述方法对数据进行分析,探讨Sleepsense床上传感器在老年住院环境中的可行性和可接受性。结果:从主题分析中得出的主要发现体现了Sleepsense床传感器在住院老年人中的可行性和接受度:用户接受度、睡眠学与临床实践的整合以及实施障碍和实际挑战。员工们报告说,Sleepsense技术的接受度很高,因为它不具有侵入性,而且能够减少夜间干扰。然而,也发现了诸如需要征得同意、数据解释和偶尔不准确等挑战。建议将Sleepsense与现有护理实践相结合,以提高患者护理水平,同时保持工作人员的信心。讨论和启示:本研究强调了先进睡眠监测技术在亚急性护理环境中的潜力,并强调了解决有效采用实施障碍的重要性。
{"title":"Exploring Bed Sensor Technology: Interdisciplinary Insights in a Geriatric Assessment Inpatient Setting.","authors":"Yong Zhao, Cromwell G Acosta, Yayan Ye, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Joanna Lawrence, Michelle Towell, Heather D'Oyley, Marion Mackay-Dunn, Bryan Chow, Lillian Hung","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sleep quality is a critical component of health and recovery for hospitalized older adults, yet current monitoring practices often lack the precision and detail required for effective intervention. This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance of implementing the artificial intelligence-powered Sleepsense bed sensor for sleep monitoring in a geriatric inpatient hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This qualitative study involved interviews with 22 patients and focus groups with 33 interdisciplinary staff members. Data were analyzed using an interpretive description approach, guided by the technology acceptance model and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, to explore the feasibility and acceptance of Sleepsense bed sensors in a geriatric inpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings from thematic analysis emerged in three main themes representing the feasibility and acceptance of Sleepsense bed sensors among hospitalized older adults: user acceptance, integration with somnolog into clinical practice, and implementation barriers and practical challenges. Staff reported high acceptance of Sleepsense technology due to its nonintrusiveness and ability to reduce disruptive nighttime checks. However, challenges such as the need for consent, data interpretation, and occasional inaccuracies were also identified. Integrating Sleepsense with existing care practices was recommended to enhance patient care while maintaining staff confidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study underscores the potential of advanced sleep monitoring technologies in subacute care settings and highlights the importance of addressing implementation barriers for effective adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Aging Research and Education: Evolving Uses, Ethics, and Equity Considerations in Gerontology. 人工智能在老龄化研究和教育中的多学科视角:老年学中不断发展的用途、伦理和公平考虑。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf314
Angela K Perone, Peter M Abadir, Nancy Berlinger, James R Carey, M Aaron Guest, Zachary J Hass, Abigail T Stephan, Bo Xie

Artificial intelligence (AI) models and applications are proliferating rapidly throughout gerontological research and education. Machine learning has catapulted gerontological research in diagnosing and treating age-related health conditions. Students and educators have new tools for customized learning and innovation. Yet many of these developments come with persistent challenges, including bias, inaccuracy, and data security. As in other fields, engagement with AI models in gerontology is often siloed within disciplines. Exploring common opportunities and challenges in this space requires collaboration and conversations across disciplines. To fill this gap, the Gerontological Society of America (GSA)'s Public Policy Advisory Panel convened a multidisciplinary panel discussion of experts from the six GSA member groups and three advisory panels in November 2024 to discuss how AI is shaping various disciplines, and what ethical issues exist within or across disciplines. Several common themes emerged across disciplines: (1) human interaction remains critical to offset AI limitations in human experience, abstract reasoning, creativity, and bias; (2) AI provides opportunities for customized support across disciplines for older adults, care partners, practitioners, researchers, and students; (3) ongoing training is essential to navigate this rapidly evolving landscape; and (4) cross-disciplinary collaboration is needed to address overlapping challenges, limitations, and risks concerning AI.

人工智能(AI)模型和应用在老年学研究和教育中迅速扩散。机器学习推动了老年学研究在诊断和治疗与年龄有关的健康状况方面的发展。学生和教育工作者有了定制学习和创新的新工具。然而,许多这些发展都伴随着持续的挑战,包括偏见、不准确和数据安全。与其他领域一样,老年学中人工智能模型的使用通常是在学科内部进行的。探索这一领域的共同机遇和挑战需要跨学科的合作和对话。为了填补这一空白,美国老年学会(GSA)的公共政策咨询小组于2024年11月召集了来自GSA六个成员小组和三个咨询小组的专家进行多学科小组讨论,讨论人工智能如何塑造各个学科,以及学科内部或跨学科存在哪些伦理问题。各学科出现了几个共同的主题:(1)人类互动对于抵消人工智能在人类经验、抽象推理、创造力和偏见方面的局限性仍然至关重要;(2)人工智能为老年人、护理伙伴、从业人员、研究人员和学生提供了跨学科定制支持的机会;(3)持续的培训对于应对这一快速变化的环境至关重要;(4)需要跨学科合作来解决与人工智能相关的重叠挑战、限制和风险。
{"title":"Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Aging Research and Education: Evolving Uses, Ethics, and Equity Considerations in Gerontology.","authors":"Angela K Perone, Peter M Abadir, Nancy Berlinger, James R Carey, M Aaron Guest, Zachary J Hass, Abigail T Stephan, Bo Xie","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf314","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) models and applications are proliferating rapidly throughout gerontological research and education. Machine learning has catapulted gerontological research in diagnosing and treating age-related health conditions. Students and educators have new tools for customized learning and innovation. Yet many of these developments come with persistent challenges, including bias, inaccuracy, and data security. As in other fields, engagement with AI models in gerontology is often siloed within disciplines. Exploring common opportunities and challenges in this space requires collaboration and conversations across disciplines. To fill this gap, the Gerontological Society of America (GSA)'s Public Policy Advisory Panel convened a multidisciplinary panel discussion of experts from the six GSA member groups and three advisory panels in November 2024 to discuss how AI is shaping various disciplines, and what ethical issues exist within or across disciplines. Several common themes emerged across disciplines: (1) human interaction remains critical to offset AI limitations in human experience, abstract reasoning, creativity, and bias; (2) AI provides opportunities for customized support across disciplines for older adults, care partners, practitioners, researchers, and students; (3) ongoing training is essential to navigate this rapidly evolving landscape; and (4) cross-disciplinary collaboration is needed to address overlapping challenges, limitations, and risks concerning AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspectives of Stress and Coping Among Older, College-Educated African American Women: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study. 受过大学教育的非裔美国老年妇女的压力和应对视角:一项基于建构主义的理论研究。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf310
Jacquelyn V Coats, Vetta L Sanders Thompson

Background and objectives: Older African American women have excess rates of stress-associated chronic diseases. Yet, limited research exists that explores within-group differences in their stress exposures and coping responses. Specifically, limited research has investigated stress and coping among college-educated African American women in later life, and this study sought to fill this gap in the literature.

Research design and methods: Constructivist grounded theory methods informed this study. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with older (aged 65+ years) African American women holding a bachelor's degree or higher. Purposive and snowball sampling was used to reach population of interest, including posting flyers in areas that might serve older African American women (local libraries, parks). Interviews focused on questions that elicited the women's perceived stressors and identified coping strategies used to buffer stress and protect well-being. Data analysis procedures involved open and focused coding, analytical memo writing, and the constant comparative approach. Several strategies, including member-check interviews, were used to achieve rigor and minimize threats to trustworthiness.

Results: A spirit of survival emerged as the core category that underpins how women experience and respond to stress. Four primary stressors were reported, which included gendered racism, losing independence, romantic relationships, and financial strain. Women described diverse coping strategies, including friendships, religion and spirituality, community care, self-care, and self-numbing strategies.

Discussion and implications: Findings provide evidence that can support the development of holistic stress-reduction interventions that integrate and center the unique stressors impacting well-educated older African American women and the coping strategies they use.

背景和目的:老年非裔美国妇女患压力相关慢性疾病的比率过高。然而,关于群体内压力暴露和应对反应差异的研究有限。具体来说,有限的研究调查了受过大学教育的非裔美国女性在晚年生活中的压力和应对能力,本研究试图填补这一文献空白。研究设计与方法:本研究采用建构主义扎根理论方法。对年龄较大(65岁以上)的非裔美国女性进行了16次半结构化访谈,这些女性持有学士学位或更高的学位。有目的和滚雪球式的抽样被用来接触感兴趣的人群,包括在可能为年长的非裔美国妇女服务的地方(当地图书馆、公园)张贴传单。访谈集中在引出女性感知压力源的问题上,并确定了用于缓冲压力和保护健康的应对策略。数据分析程序包括开放和集中的编码,分析备忘录的写作,和不断比较的方法。一些策略,包括成员核查访谈,被用来达到严谨性和最小化对可信度的威胁。结果:生存精神成为支撑女性如何体验和应对压力的核心范畴。报告了四种主要的压力源,包括性别种族主义、失去独立性、恋爱关系和经济压力。女性描述了多种应对策略,包括友谊、宗教和灵性、社区护理、自我护理和自我麻木策略。讨论和启示:研究结果提供了证据,可以支持整体减压干预措施的发展,这些干预措施整合并集中了影响受过良好教育的非裔美国老年妇女的独特压力源及其使用的应对策略。
{"title":"Perspectives of Stress and Coping Among Older, College-Educated African American Women: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study.","authors":"Jacquelyn V Coats, Vetta L Sanders Thompson","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older African American women have excess rates of stress-associated chronic diseases. Yet, limited research exists that explores within-group differences in their stress exposures and coping responses. Specifically, limited research has investigated stress and coping among college-educated African American women in later life, and this study sought to fill this gap in the literature.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Constructivist grounded theory methods informed this study. Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with older (aged 65+ years) African American women holding a bachelor's degree or higher. Purposive and snowball sampling was used to reach population of interest, including posting flyers in areas that might serve older African American women (local libraries, parks). Interviews focused on questions that elicited the women's perceived stressors and identified coping strategies used to buffer stress and protect well-being. Data analysis procedures involved open and focused coding, analytical memo writing, and the constant comparative approach. Several strategies, including member-check interviews, were used to achieve rigor and minimize threats to trustworthiness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A spirit of survival emerged as the core category that underpins how women experience and respond to stress. Four primary stressors were reported, which included gendered racism, losing independence, romantic relationships, and financial strain. Women described diverse coping strategies, including friendships, religion and spirituality, community care, self-care, and self-numbing strategies.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings provide evidence that can support the development of holistic stress-reduction interventions that integrate and center the unique stressors impacting well-educated older African American women and the coping strategies they use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145783474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors and circumstances associated with homelessness in older adults: a scoping review of quantitative and qualitative studies. 与老年人无家可归有关的风险因素和情况:定量和定性研究的范围审查。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf307
Peter M Hoang, Rose A Samra, Courtney van Ballegooie, Colin R J Whaley, Yu Qing Huang, Moni Ghosh, Vanessa Duong, Kristina Kokorelias, Jillian Alston, Paula Rochon

Background and objectives: Circumstances more common with aging may challenge the ability for older adults to maintain appropriate housing. The objective of this scoping review was to identify the risk factors and conditions associated with homelessness in older adults.

Research design and methods: We searched OVID, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Social Works Abstracts from inception to February 2023. We included studies of older adults (defined as 50 years of age or older) or completed subgroup analyses accounting for older adults. We mapped the risk factors and conditions using an ecological framework (individual, relational, and structural/societal components).

Results: Sixty-five studies were included. Individual factors included identifying membership in a racialized group, and experiencing psychiatric illnesses or substance use disorders. Relational factors included being unmarried, relationship breakdown, and adverse childhood events. Structural factors included the lack of affordable housing or income supports, and systemic discrimination. Those experiencing first-onset late life homelessness were more likely to be female, had relative lifelong socioeconomic stability, but experienced sudden relational or economic changes. Those experiencing chronic homelessness were more likely to be male, often facing persistent structural vulnerabilities with comorbid substance use or psychiatric disorders. Important research gaps include measures of social support, and age and sex disaggregated analyses.

Discussion and implications: Key individual, relational, and structural factors are associated with homelessness in older adults. Adverse experiences and structural factors such as social losses and isolation have important implications towards the risk of homelessness at different stages in life. sFurther research evaluating age-appropriate interventions is paramount.

背景和目的:随着年龄的增长,更常见的情况可能会挑战老年人维持适当住房的能力。本次范围审查的目的是确定与老年人无家可归相关的风险因素和条件。研究设计和方法:我们检索了OVID, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL和Social Works Abstracts,检索时间从成立到2023年2月。我们纳入了老年人(定义为50岁或以上)的研究或完成了针对老年人的亚组分析。我们使用生态框架(个人、关系和结构/社会成分)绘制了风险因素和条件。结果:纳入65项研究。个人因素包括确定种族化群体的成员身份,经历精神疾病或物质使用障碍。相关因素包括未婚、关系破裂和童年不良事件。结构性因素包括缺乏负担得起的住房或收入支持,以及系统性歧视。那些首次出现晚年无家可归的人更有可能是女性,一生的社会经济相对稳定,但经历了突然的关系或经济变化。那些长期无家可归的人更可能是男性,他们往往面临着持续的结构性脆弱性,并伴有合并症的物质使用或精神疾病。重要的研究差距包括社会支持措施,以及年龄和性别分类分析。讨论和启示:关键的个人、关系和结构因素与老年人无家可归有关。不利的经历和结构性因素,如社会损失和孤立,对人生不同阶段的无家可归风险有重要影响。进一步研究评估适合年龄的干预措施是至关重要的。
{"title":"Risk factors and circumstances associated with homelessness in older adults: a scoping review of quantitative and qualitative studies.","authors":"Peter M Hoang, Rose A Samra, Courtney van Ballegooie, Colin R J Whaley, Yu Qing Huang, Moni Ghosh, Vanessa Duong, Kristina Kokorelias, Jillian Alston, Paula Rochon","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Circumstances more common with aging may challenge the ability for older adults to maintain appropriate housing. The objective of this scoping review was to identify the risk factors and conditions associated with homelessness in older adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We searched OVID, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Social Works Abstracts from inception to February 2023. We included studies of older adults (defined as 50 years of age or older) or completed subgroup analyses accounting for older adults. We mapped the risk factors and conditions using an ecological framework (individual, relational, and structural/societal components).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five studies were included. Individual factors included identifying membership in a racialized group, and experiencing psychiatric illnesses or substance use disorders. Relational factors included being unmarried, relationship breakdown, and adverse childhood events. Structural factors included the lack of affordable housing or income supports, and systemic discrimination. Those experiencing first-onset late life homelessness were more likely to be female, had relative lifelong socioeconomic stability, but experienced sudden relational or economic changes. Those experiencing chronic homelessness were more likely to be male, often facing persistent structural vulnerabilities with comorbid substance use or psychiatric disorders. Important research gaps include measures of social support, and age and sex disaggregated analyses.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Key individual, relational, and structural factors are associated with homelessness in older adults. Adverse experiences and structural factors such as social losses and isolation have important implications towards the risk of homelessness at different stages in life. sFurther research evaluating age-appropriate interventions is paramount.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145764539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of social support on suicidal ideation in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 社会支持对老年人自杀意念的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf302
Xinyu Wan, Xuehan Ma, Gengxin Yao, Yiran Xu, Yali Yang, Lishuang Zheng, Xin Li, Yiming Qiu, Li Chen, Guichen Li

Background and objectives: Compared with people in any other age group, older adults worldwide have more suicidal ideation; however, their suicidal ideation is easily overlooked. Social support is currently one of the most widely researched social resources for preventing suicide. Currently, the impact of social support on suicidal ideation in this population is still uncertain. This study aimed to explore the impact of social support on suicidal ideation in older adults.

Research design and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including the Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases. Two independent researchers selected the studies, extracted the data and evaluated their quality. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 18.0.

Results: This review identified 23 studies, and 14 eligible studies were included in the meta-analyses. High social support was significantly associated with a low risk of suicidal ideation (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.84; I  2 = 93.1%; P < 0.001). Social support is more effective in reducing the risk of SI in women than in men. Social support from families is most effective at reducing suicidal ideation in older adults, and social support can also influence suicidal ideation through mediating factors.

Discussion and implications: Social support is significantly correlated with suicidal ideation in older adults. Medical staff or researchers can prioritise social support from families and develop targeted interventions to more effectively reduce the risk of suicidal ideation in older adults.

背景与目的:与其他任何年龄组的人相比,世界范围内老年人有更多的自杀意念;然而,他们的自杀意念很容易被忽视。社会支持是目前研究最广泛的预防自杀的社会资源之一。目前,社会支持对该人群自杀意念的影响尚不确定。本研究旨在探讨社会支持对老年人自杀意念的影响。研究设计与方法:在Web of Science、PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane Library和Scopus等多个数据库中进行全面的文献检索。两名独立研究人员选择研究,提取数据并评估其质量。采用STATA 18.0版本进行统计分析。结果:本综述确定了23项研究,14项符合条件的研究被纳入meta分析。高社会支持与低自杀意念风险显著相关(OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 ~ 0.84; i2 = 93.1%; P < 0.001)。社会支持在降低女性自杀风险方面比男性更有效。家庭社会支持对降低老年人自杀意念最有效,社会支持也可以通过中介因素影响自杀意念。讨论与启示:社会支持与老年人自杀意念显著相关。医务人员或研究人员可以优先考虑来自家庭的社会支持,并制定有针对性的干预措施,以更有效地减少老年人产生自杀念头的风险。
{"title":"Influence of social support on suicidal ideation in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xinyu Wan, Xuehan Ma, Gengxin Yao, Yiran Xu, Yali Yang, Lishuang Zheng, Xin Li, Yiming Qiu, Li Chen, Guichen Li","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf302","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Compared with people in any other age group, older adults worldwide have more suicidal ideation; however, their suicidal ideation is easily overlooked. Social support is currently one of the most widely researched social resources for preventing suicide. Currently, the impact of social support on suicidal ideation in this population is still uncertain. This study aimed to explore the impact of social support on suicidal ideation in older adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including the Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases. Two independent researchers selected the studies, extracted the data and evaluated their quality. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 18.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review identified 23 studies, and 14 eligible studies were included in the meta-analyses. High social support was significantly associated with a low risk of suicidal ideation (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.84; I  2 = 93.1%; P < 0.001). Social support is more effective in reducing the risk of SI in women than in men. Social support from families is most effective at reducing suicidal ideation in older adults, and social support can also influence suicidal ideation through mediating factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Social support is significantly correlated with suicidal ideation in older adults. Medical staff or researchers can prioritise social support from families and develop targeted interventions to more effectively reduce the risk of suicidal ideation in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neighborhood Built Environments and Social Inclusion Among Older Adults with Memory Problems: A Caregiver Survey. 有记忆问题的老年人的社区建筑环境与社会包容:一项照顾者调查。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf303
Seokyung Park, Xi Chen, Wenjin Wang, Samuel D C Towne, Xuemei Zhu, Chanam Lee, Marcia G Ory

Background and objectives: Population aging underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of the multi-level factors that support aging in place. Physical environments are closely linked to social environments, and caregivers often observe how these environmental features shape the everyday experience of people with memory problems. This study examines how caregivers' perceptions of neighborhood built environments are associated with their perceptions of the social inclusion of people with memory problems in communities.

Research design and methods: A statewide survey was conducted in Texas, involving 95 caregivers of individuals with memory problems (defined as having significant memory impairment that impacts daily functioning). Descriptive statistics summarized neighborhood characteristics and caregivers' perception of the community's social inclusion. Logistic regression predicted two target outcomes of social inclusion for people with memory problems: (1) respect and support and (2) intergenerational exchange (e.g., age-integrated social interactions).

Results: For neighborhood characteristics, legibility-related environmental features were more commonly present than those related to accessibility or safety. For social inclusion, caregivers perceived positive community respect and support for people with memory problems but limited intergenerational interaction. Legibility of neighborhood environments was positively associated with caregivers' perceptions of respect and support for people with memory problems, while accessibility was associated with intergenerational exchange.

Discussion and implications: The findings underscore the role and potential of neighborhood environments for improving social inclusion for people living with memory problems. They suggest that improving legibility and accessibility of neighborhood environments can foster respect and social support and intergenerational exchanges central to aging in place.

背景和目的:人口老龄化强调了全面了解支持老龄化的多层次因素的必要性。物理环境与社会环境密切相关,护理人员经常观察这些环境特征如何塑造有记忆问题的人的日常经历。本研究探讨了照顾者对社区建筑环境的看法如何与他们对社区中有记忆问题的人的社会包容的看法相关联。研究设计和方法:在德克萨斯州进行了一项全州范围的调查,涉及95名有记忆问题(定义为有严重的记忆障碍,影响日常功能)的护理人员。描述性统计总结了社区特征和照顾者对社区社会包容的感知。Logistic回归预测了记忆障碍患者社会包容的两个目标结果:(1)尊重和支持;(2)代际交换(如年龄融合的社会互动)。结果:对于社区特征,易读性相关的环境特征比可达性或安全性相关的环境特征更常见。在社会包容方面,照顾者对有记忆问题的人有积极的社区尊重和支持,但代际互动有限。社区环境的易读性与照顾者对有记忆问题的人的尊重和支持的看法呈正相关,而可达性与代际交流有关。讨论和启示:研究结果强调了社区环境在改善有记忆问题的人的社会包容方面的作用和潜力。他们认为,改善社区环境的易读性和可达性可以促进尊重、社会支持和代际交流,这对老年人至关重要。
{"title":"Neighborhood Built Environments and Social Inclusion Among Older Adults with Memory Problems: A Caregiver Survey.","authors":"Seokyung Park, Xi Chen, Wenjin Wang, Samuel D C Towne, Xuemei Zhu, Chanam Lee, Marcia G Ory","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Population aging underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of the multi-level factors that support aging in place. Physical environments are closely linked to social environments, and caregivers often observe how these environmental features shape the everyday experience of people with memory problems. This study examines how caregivers' perceptions of neighborhood built environments are associated with their perceptions of the social inclusion of people with memory problems in communities.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A statewide survey was conducted in Texas, involving 95 caregivers of individuals with memory problems (defined as having significant memory impairment that impacts daily functioning). Descriptive statistics summarized neighborhood characteristics and caregivers' perception of the community's social inclusion. Logistic regression predicted two target outcomes of social inclusion for people with memory problems: (1) respect and support and (2) intergenerational exchange (e.g., age-integrated social interactions).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For neighborhood characteristics, legibility-related environmental features were more commonly present than those related to accessibility or safety. For social inclusion, caregivers perceived positive community respect and support for people with memory problems but limited intergenerational interaction. Legibility of neighborhood environments was positively associated with caregivers' perceptions of respect and support for people with memory problems, while accessibility was associated with intergenerational exchange.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The findings underscore the role and potential of neighborhood environments for improving social inclusion for people living with memory problems. They suggest that improving legibility and accessibility of neighborhood environments can foster respect and social support and intergenerational exchanges central to aging in place.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Employee Background Check Policies in Long-Term Care Facilities in the United States. 美国长期护理机构的员工背景调查政策。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf306
Gulrukh Mehboob, Brian Kaskie, Hari Sharma

Background and objectives: Employee background checks can help protect older adults in long-term care facilities. The National Background Check Program (NBCP) offers federal support to strengthen employee background check systems. Yet, regulations on provider requirements, disqualifying offenses, and administrative processes differ across states. We examine differences between NBCP (N = 27) and non-NBCP (N = 23) states across three domains: (1) types of LTC providers required to conduct background checks (2) disqualifying offenses considered by each state, and (3) processes used to administer background checks. We also assess regulatory changes across these domains from 2005 to 2024 across all 50 states.

Research design and methods: We conducted policy surveillance of state regulations on employee background check programs applicable to individuals seeking work at long-term care facilities. Our sample includes all 50 states, with 27 receiving an NBCP grant. We assess current regulations across three policy domains and review how these regulations have evolved since 2005, when the NBCP pilot program was initiated.

Results: NBCP states have expanded background check regulations to include a broader range of long-term care providers and disqualifying offenses following the grant. However, minimal differences were observed between the two groups in background check processes such as fingerprinting and registry reviews.

Discussion and implications: While many NBCP states have adopted measures like disqualifying offenses and RAP back systems, their overall impact on hiring practices, F-tags and quality of care remains uncertain.

背景和目的:员工背景调查可以帮助保护长期护理机构中的老年人。国家背景调查计划(NBCP)为加强雇员背景调查系统提供联邦支持。然而,关于提供者要求、取消资格的违法行为和行政程序的规定在各州有所不同。我们在三个领域研究了NBCP (N = 27)和非NBCP (N = 23)州之间的差异:(1)进行背景调查所需的LTC提供者类型;(2)每个州考虑的取消资格犯罪;(3)用于管理背景调查的流程。我们还评估了所有50个州从2005年到2024年在这些领域的监管变化。研究设计和方法:我们对适用于在长期护理机构寻找工作的个人的员工背景调查计划的国家法规进行了政策监督。我们的样本包括所有50个州,其中27个州获得了NBCP拨款。我们评估了三个政策领域的现行法规,并回顾了自2005年NBCP试点项目启动以来这些法规的演变情况。结果:NBCP各州扩大了背景调查规定,包括更广泛的长期护理提供者和取消资格的违法行为。然而,在指纹和注册表审查等背景调查过程中,两组之间的差异很小。讨论和影响:虽然许多NBCP州已经采取了诸如取消资格违规和RAP系统等措施,但它们对招聘实践、f标签和护理质量的总体影响仍不确定。
{"title":"Employee Background Check Policies in Long-Term Care Facilities in the United States.","authors":"Gulrukh Mehboob, Brian Kaskie, Hari Sharma","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Employee background checks can help protect older adults in long-term care facilities. The National Background Check Program (NBCP) offers federal support to strengthen employee background check systems. Yet, regulations on provider requirements, disqualifying offenses, and administrative processes differ across states. We examine differences between NBCP (N = 27) and non-NBCP (N = 23) states across three domains: (1) types of LTC providers required to conduct background checks (2) disqualifying offenses considered by each state, and (3) processes used to administer background checks. We also assess regulatory changes across these domains from 2005 to 2024 across all 50 states.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted policy surveillance of state regulations on employee background check programs applicable to individuals seeking work at long-term care facilities. Our sample includes all 50 states, with 27 receiving an NBCP grant. We assess current regulations across three policy domains and review how these regulations have evolved since 2005, when the NBCP pilot program was initiated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NBCP states have expanded background check regulations to include a broader range of long-term care providers and disqualifying offenses following the grant. However, minimal differences were observed between the two groups in background check processes such as fingerprinting and registry reviews.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>While many NBCP states have adopted measures like disqualifying offenses and RAP back systems, their overall impact on hiring practices, F-tags and quality of care remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of sexual and gender minority (SGM) affirmative policies in long-term care facilities in Minnesota. 明尼苏达州长期护理机构中性和性别少数群体(SGM)平权政策的普遍程度。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaf290
Tetyana P Shippee, Andrew Alberth, Rajean Moone, Jason Flatt, Ziwei Zhang, Nidhi Kohli, Morgan Wright, Carrie Henning-Smith, Sean Cahill, B R Simon Rosser

Background and objectives: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults are more likely to use long-term care (LTC) than their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts. However, LTC settings may lack SGM-affirming policies necessary for inclusive care. This study analyzed the prevalence of SGM-affirming policies in nursing homes (NH) and assisted living facilities (ALF) in Minnesota and examined differences across facility characteristics.

Research design and methods: A survey was conducted across 165 NH and 266 ALF in Minnesota. Facilities were assessed by their explicit inclusion of 28 SGM-affirmative policies, like nondiscrimination and training policies, with a mean index score calculated to determine the overall prevalence of affirming policies. Differences by facility type (NH vs ALF), location (rural vs. urban), ownership (non-profit vs. for-profit), and religious affiliation (religious vs. secular) were assessed in multinomial logistic regression. Latent class analysis compared lower (n = 244) and higher (n = 153) performers across facility characteristics.

Results: Across LTC facilities, there was an average of 11.30 SGM-affirming policies out of 28 policies assessed. Lower performing facilities reported fewer SGM-affirming policies (mean = 7.34) than higher performing facilities (mean = 17.24). No significant differences in policy prevalence were found between NH and ALF; between rural and urban facilities or by ownership status. However, striving facilities were more likely to be secular than religious.

Discussion and implications: The prevalence of SGM-affirming policies was distributed binomially, suggesting facilities fall within two categories (lower performers and high performers). Efforts should focus on adopting SGM-affirmative policies across all LTC facilities to ensure equitable and inclusive care for SGM older adults.

背景和目的:性少数和性别少数(SGM)老年人比他们的顺性别、异性恋同龄人更有可能使用长期护理(LTC)。然而,LTC设置可能缺乏包容性护理所必需的sgm确认政策。本研究分析了明尼苏达州养老院(NH)和辅助生活设施(ALF)中sgm肯定政策的流行情况,并检查了设施特征之间的差异。研究设计和方法:对明尼苏达州165个NH和266个ALF进行了调查。对设施的评估是根据其明确包含28项sgm平权政策,如非歧视和培训政策,并计算出平均指数得分,以确定平权政策的总体流行程度。在多项逻辑回归中评估了设施类型(NH vs ALF)、位置(农村vs城市)、所有权(非营利vs营利性)和宗教信仰(宗教vs世俗)的差异。潜在类别分析比较了不同设施特征的较低(n = 244)和较高(n = 153)表演者。结果:在整个LTC设施中,在评估的28项政策中,平均有11.30项支持sgm的政策。表现较差的设施报告的sgm确认政策(平均= 7.34)比表现较好的设施(平均= 17.24)少。在政策流行度上,国家和地区没有显著差异;城乡设施之间或按所有制地位。然而,奋斗设施更可能是世俗的,而不是宗教的。讨论和影响:肯定sgm政策的流行是二项分布的,表明设施分为两类(低绩效和高绩效)。努力的重点应是在所有LTC设施中采用支持SGM的政策,以确保为SGM老年人提供公平和包容性的护理。
{"title":"Prevalence of sexual and gender minority (SGM) affirmative policies in long-term care facilities in Minnesota.","authors":"Tetyana P Shippee, Andrew Alberth, Rajean Moone, Jason Flatt, Ziwei Zhang, Nidhi Kohli, Morgan Wright, Carrie Henning-Smith, Sean Cahill, B R Simon Rosser","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf290","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults are more likely to use long-term care (LTC) than their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts. However, LTC settings may lack SGM-affirming policies necessary for inclusive care. This study analyzed the prevalence of SGM-affirming policies in nursing homes (NH) and assisted living facilities (ALF) in Minnesota and examined differences across facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A survey was conducted across 165 NH and 266 ALF in Minnesota. Facilities were assessed by their explicit inclusion of 28 SGM-affirmative policies, like nondiscrimination and training policies, with a mean index score calculated to determine the overall prevalence of affirming policies. Differences by facility type (NH vs ALF), location (rural vs. urban), ownership (non-profit vs. for-profit), and religious affiliation (religious vs. secular) were assessed in multinomial logistic regression. Latent class analysis compared lower (n = 244) and higher (n = 153) performers across facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across LTC facilities, there was an average of 11.30 SGM-affirming policies out of 28 policies assessed. Lower performing facilities reported fewer SGM-affirming policies (mean = 7.34) than higher performing facilities (mean = 17.24). No significant differences in policy prevalence were found between NH and ALF; between rural and urban facilities or by ownership status. However, striving facilities were more likely to be secular than religious.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The prevalence of SGM-affirming policies was distributed binomially, suggesting facilities fall within two categories (lower performers and high performers). Efforts should focus on adopting SGM-affirmative policies across all LTC facilities to ensure equitable and inclusive care for SGM older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Gerontologist
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1