首页 > 最新文献

Gerontologist最新文献

英文 中文
Hospital-Based Health Professionals' Perceptions of Frailty in Older People. 医院卫生专业人员对老年人体弱的看法。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae041
Kisani Manuel, Maria Crotty, Susan E Kurrle, Ian D Cameron, Rachel Lane, Keri Lockwood, Heather Block, Catherine Sherrington, Dimity Pond, Tuan A Nguyen, Kate Laver

Background and objectives: There is a high prevalence of frailty amongst older patients in hospital settings. Frailty guidelines exist but implementation to date has been challenging. Understanding health professional attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs about frailty is critical in understanding barriers and enablers to guideline implementation, and the aim of this study was to understand these in rehabilitation multidisciplinary teams in hospital settings.

Research design and methods: Twenty-three semistructured interviews were conducted with health professionals working in multidisciplinary teams on geriatric and rehabilitation wards in Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded by 2 researchers. A codebook was created and interviews were recoded and applied to the Framework Method of thematic analysis.

Results: Three domains were developed: diagnosing frailty, communicating about frailty, and managing frailty. Within these domains, 8 themes were identified: (1) diagnosing frailty has questionable benefits, (2) clinicians don't use frailty screening tools, (3) frailty can be diagnosed on appearance and history, (4) frailty has a stigma, (5) clinicians don't use the word "frail" with patients, (6) frailty isn't always reversible, (7) there is a lack of continuity of care after acute admission, and (8) the community setting lacks resources.

Discussion and implications: Implementation of frailty guidelines will remain challenging while staff avoid using the term "frail," don't perceive benefit of using screening tools, and focus on the individual aspects of frailty rather than the syndrome holistically. Clinical champions and education about frailty identification, reversibility, management, and communication techniques may improve the implementation of frailty guidelines in hospitals.

背景和目的:在医院环境中,老年患者体弱的发病率很高。虽然已有虚弱指南,但迄今为止其实施仍面临挑战。了解医护人员对虚弱的态度、知识和信念对于了解指南实施的障碍和促进因素至关重要,本研究旨在了解医院康复多学科团队中的这些因素:对在澳大利亚阿德莱德和悉尼老年病区和康复病房的多学科团队工作的医护人员进行了 23 次半结构化访谈。访谈由两名研究人员进行录音、转录和编码。建立了一个编码本,对访谈进行重新编码,并应用框架法进行主题分析:结果:形成了三个领域:体弱诊断、体弱沟通和体弱管理。在这些领域中,确定了八个主题:(1) 诊断虚弱的益处值得怀疑,(2) 临床医生不使用虚弱筛查工具,(3) 根据外表和病史就能诊断出虚弱,(4) 虚弱是一种耻辱,(5) 临床医生不对病人使用 "虚弱 "一词,(6) 虚弱并不总是可逆的,(7) 急性入院后缺乏连续性护理,(8) 社区环境缺乏资源:讨论:如果医务人员避免使用 "虚弱 "一词,不认为使用筛查工具有好处,只关注虚弱的个体方面而不是综合征的整体方面,那么虚弱指南的实施仍将面临挑战。临床倡导者和有关虚弱识别、可逆性、管理和沟通技巧的教育可改善虚弱指南在医院的实施。
{"title":"Hospital-Based Health Professionals' Perceptions of Frailty in Older People.","authors":"Kisani Manuel, Maria Crotty, Susan E Kurrle, Ian D Cameron, Rachel Lane, Keri Lockwood, Heather Block, Catherine Sherrington, Dimity Pond, Tuan A Nguyen, Kate Laver","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae041","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnae041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>There is a high prevalence of frailty amongst older patients in hospital settings. Frailty guidelines exist but implementation to date has been challenging. Understanding health professional attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs about frailty is critical in understanding barriers and enablers to guideline implementation, and the aim of this study was to understand these in rehabilitation multidisciplinary teams in hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Twenty-three semistructured interviews were conducted with health professionals working in multidisciplinary teams on geriatric and rehabilitation wards in Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded by 2 researchers. A codebook was created and interviews were recoded and applied to the Framework Method of thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three domains were developed: diagnosing frailty, communicating about frailty, and managing frailty. Within these domains, 8 themes were identified: (1) diagnosing frailty has questionable benefits, (2) clinicians don't use frailty screening tools, (3) frailty can be diagnosed on appearance and history, (4) frailty has a stigma, (5) clinicians don't use the word \"frail\" with patients, (6) frailty isn't always reversible, (7) there is a lack of continuity of care after acute admission, and (8) the community setting lacks resources.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Implementation of frailty guidelines will remain challenging while staff avoid using the term \"frail,\" don't perceive benefit of using screening tools, and focus on the individual aspects of frailty rather than the syndrome holistically. Clinical champions and education about frailty identification, reversibility, management, and communication techniques may improve the implementation of frailty guidelines in hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181707/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140861192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FlourishCare Model of Integrated Care: The Validation of the Flourish Index-Revised. FlourishCare 综合护理模式:Flourish Index-Revised (FI-R) 的验证。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae042
Anna C Faul, Joseph G D'Ambrosio, Samantha G Cotton, Molly M Dobson, Christian D Furman, Barbara A Gordon, Katherine E Linzy, Pamela A Yankeelov

Background and objectives: This study validates the Flourish Index-Revised (FI-R), a tool evaluating integrated healthcare models. The original Flourish Index (FI) was developed in 2018 and has been refined to align with the FlourishCare (FC) Model (Model) for geriatric primary care.

Research design and methods: The Model provides integrated biopsychosocial healthcare to older adults. The FI-R uses 25 quality-of-care indicators and 7 contextual community indicators. The FI-R was validated with Categorial Principal Components Analysis (CATPCA) using a sample of 949 patients 50+ who were mostly female (73%), non-Hispanic White (70%), living in urban areas (90%), and married (29%), single (22%), or divorced (19%). The mean age was 73.46 (standard deviation [SD] = 10.86) and mean years of education was 14.30 (SD = 2.14).

Results: CATPCA showed a 4-dimensional structure of biological, psychological, and 2 social determinants of health (SDOH) subdomains: health behaviors and community. Final selection of indicators was based on total variance accounted for >0.30, absolute values of item loadings >0.45, and not having cross-loadings >0.45 on 2 factors. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the determinants were biological = 0.75, psychological = 0.76, SDOH:community = 0.70, SDOH:health behaviors = 0.50, and total FI-R = 0.95. Sensitivity to change was shown for the total FI-R, psychological determinants, and SDOH:health behaviors, but not for biological determinants.

Discussion and implications: The validation of the FI-R shows promise for its usability to evaluate integrated healthcare models using existing measures in electronic health systems. More work is needed to improve the incorporation of SDOH:sociodemographics into the FI-R.

背景和目的:本研究验证了Flourish指数-修订版(FI-R),这是一种评估综合医疗模式的工具。最初的Flourish指数(FI)开发于2018年(Faul et al:该模型为老年人提供综合的生物-心理-社会健康护理。FI-R 使用 25 个护理质量指标和 7 个社区环境指标。FI-R通过分类主成分分析(CATPCA)对949名50岁以上的患者进行了验证,这些患者大多为女性(73%)、非西班牙裔白人(70%)、居住在城市地区(90%)、已婚(29%)、单身(22%)或离异(19%)。平均年龄为 73.46 岁(SD=10.86),平均受教育年限为 14.30 年(SD=2.14):CATPCA显示了一个四维结构,包括生物、心理和两个健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)子域:健康行为和社区。最终选择指标的依据是:所占总方差大于 0.30,项目负荷的绝对值大于 0.45,以及两个因子上的交叉负荷不大于 0.45。决定因素的内部一致性(Cronbach Alpha)为:生物=0.75,心理=0.76,SDOH:社区=0.70,SDOH:健康行为=0.50,FI-R 总值=0.95。总 FI-R、心理决定因素和 SDOH:健康行为对变化的敏感性均有显示,但生物决定因素没有显示:FI-R的验证表明,利用电子医疗系统中的现有测量方法来评估综合医疗模式是可行的。还需要做更多的工作,以便更好地将SDOH:社会人口统计学纳入FI-R。
{"title":"FlourishCare Model of Integrated Care: The Validation of the Flourish Index-Revised.","authors":"Anna C Faul, Joseph G D'Ambrosio, Samantha G Cotton, Molly M Dobson, Christian D Furman, Barbara A Gordon, Katherine E Linzy, Pamela A Yankeelov","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae042","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnae042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study validates the Flourish Index-Revised (FI-R), a tool evaluating integrated healthcare models. The original Flourish Index (FI) was developed in 2018 and has been refined to align with the FlourishCare (FC) Model (Model) for geriatric primary care.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The Model provides integrated biopsychosocial healthcare to older adults. The FI-R uses 25 quality-of-care indicators and 7 contextual community indicators. The FI-R was validated with Categorial Principal Components Analysis (CATPCA) using a sample of 949 patients 50+ who were mostly female (73%), non-Hispanic White (70%), living in urban areas (90%), and married (29%), single (22%), or divorced (19%). The mean age was 73.46 (standard deviation [SD] = 10.86) and mean years of education was 14.30 (SD = 2.14).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CATPCA showed a 4-dimensional structure of biological, psychological, and 2 social determinants of health (SDOH) subdomains: health behaviors and community. Final selection of indicators was based on total variance accounted for >0.30, absolute values of item loadings >0.45, and not having cross-loadings >0.45 on 2 factors. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the determinants were biological = 0.75, psychological = 0.76, SDOH:community = 0.70, SDOH:health behaviors = 0.50, and total FI-R = 0.95. Sensitivity to change was shown for the total FI-R, psychological determinants, and SDOH:health behaviors, but not for biological determinants.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The validation of the FI-R shows promise for its usability to evaluate integrated healthcare models using existing measures in electronic health systems. More work is needed to improve the incorporation of SDOH:sociodemographics into the FI-R.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11184524/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140899686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neighborhood Gentrification and Food Insecurity Among Urban Older Adults: Evidence From New York City. 城市老年人中的邻里乡绅化与粮食不安全:来自纽约市的证据。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae048
Ethan Siu Leung Cheung

Background and objectives: Gentrification is a prevalent neighborhood development process in urban areas across the United States. Prior studies have identified the influence of gentrification on late-life health and quality of life, yet little is known about its relationship with food insecurity, an important public health issue for older adult populations. Using New York City as a case study, this study investigated associations between living in a gentrifying neighborhood and food insecurity, as well as the mediating roles of neighborhood environment factors-social cohesion, public transportation, and food environment.

Research design and methods: This study adopted 2 waves of annual data from the Poverty Tracker Study (2015-2016; N = 703) merged with American Community Survey and spatial data sets to measure gentrification and neighborhood factors. Adjusted logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between gentrification and food insecurity. Further mediation analyses were conducted to test the mechanisms of such associations.

Results: Older adults in gentrifying neighborhoods were more likely to have food insecurity than those in moderate- to high-income neighborhoods. Compared to low-income neighborhoods, older adults in gentrifying neighborhoods had a lower likelihood of reporting food insecurity. Two significant mediators were found when comparing gentrification with moderate- to high-income neighborhoods: social cohesion and healthy food outlets.

Discussion and implications: This study highlights the importance of gentrification in determining late-life food insecurity and identifies possible mechanisms with policy and social service implications to reduce the risk of food insecurity in urban areas.

背景和目标:城市化是美国城市地区普遍存在的一个邻里发展过程。先前的研究已经确定了城市化对晚年健康和生活质量的影响,但对其与食物不安全的关系却知之甚少,而食物不安全是老年人群的一个重要公共卫生问题。本研究以纽约市为案例,调查了居住在城市化社区与食品不安全之间的关系,以及社区环境因素--社会凝聚力、公共交通和食品环境--的中介作用:本研究采用了 "贫困追踪研究"(Poverty Tracker Study,2015-16 年;N = 703)的两波年度数据,并与美国社区调查和空间数据集合并,以衡量城市化和邻里因素。使用调整后的逻辑回归来检验城市化与粮食不安全之间的关联。我们还进行了进一步的中介分析,以检验这种关联的机制:结果:与中高收入社区的老年人相比,城市化社区的老年人更有可能面临粮食不安全问题。与低收入社区相比,城市化社区的老年人报告食物无保障的可能性较低。在比较城市化与中高收入社区时,发现了两个重要的中介因素:社会凝聚力和健康食品店:本研究强调了城市化在决定晚年粮食不安全方面的重要性,并确定了可能的机制,这些机制对减少城市地区粮食不安全的风险具有政策和社会服务方面的影响。
{"title":"Neighborhood Gentrification and Food Insecurity Among Urban Older Adults: Evidence From New York City.","authors":"Ethan Siu Leung Cheung","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae048","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnae048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Gentrification is a prevalent neighborhood development process in urban areas across the United States. Prior studies have identified the influence of gentrification on late-life health and quality of life, yet little is known about its relationship with food insecurity, an important public health issue for older adult populations. Using New York City as a case study, this study investigated associations between living in a gentrifying neighborhood and food insecurity, as well as the mediating roles of neighborhood environment factors-social cohesion, public transportation, and food environment.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study adopted 2 waves of annual data from the Poverty Tracker Study (2015-2016; N = 703) merged with American Community Survey and spatial data sets to measure gentrification and neighborhood factors. Adjusted logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between gentrification and food insecurity. Further mediation analyses were conducted to test the mechanisms of such associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults in gentrifying neighborhoods were more likely to have food insecurity than those in moderate- to high-income neighborhoods. Compared to low-income neighborhoods, older adults in gentrifying neighborhoods had a lower likelihood of reporting food insecurity. Two significant mediators were found when comparing gentrification with moderate- to high-income neighborhoods: social cohesion and healthy food outlets.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This study highlights the importance of gentrification in determining late-life food insecurity and identifies possible mechanisms with policy and social service implications to reduce the risk of food insecurity in urban areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140960613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of the Perceived Community Support Questionnaire for Older Chinese. 中国老年人社区支持感知问卷(PCSQ)的验证。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae046
Run-Ping Che, Mei-Chun Cheung, Juan Herrero

Background and objectives: Community support has a profound positive impact on older people's health and plays a crucial role in facilitating aging in place. This impact is particularly significant in the Chinese context, where community support can alleviate the pressure on traditional family caregiving. This study translated, adapted, and validated the perceived community support questionnaire (PCSQ) for use with older Chinese.

Research design and methods: Data for this validation study were collected from a cross-sectional survey of 1,064 Chinese aged 65 years and above. Following the cultural adaptation of the PCSQ-14, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine its factor structure. Criterion validity, convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability of the scale were also assessed.

Results: Based on the CFA results, the adapted PCSQ-14 was found to have a 3-factor solution for community integration, community participation, and community organizations. The criterion-related validity was supported by its significant correlation with depression. Convergent and discriminant validity were established, with the internal consistency of the scale being 0.90. The test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficient for the scale was 0.78.

Discussion and implications: The adapted version of the PCSQ-14 demonstrated promising psychometric properties in assessing perceived community support in older Chinese. The adapted PCSQ-14 could assist researchers in determining older Chinese adults' perceptions of community support, and could also assist practitioners and policymakers in developing targeted services for older people and allocating resources more effectively.

背景和目标:社区支持对老年人的健康有着深远的积极影响,在促进居家养老方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这种影响在中国尤为显著,因为社区支持可以减轻传统家庭护理的压力。本研究对感知社区支持问卷(PCSQ)进行了翻译、改编和验证,并将其用于中国老年人:本验证研究的数据来自一项横断面调查,调查对象为 1,064 名 65 岁及以上的中国人。在对 PCSQ-14 进行文化改编后,对其因子结构进行了确认性因子分析(CFA)。此外,还评估了量表的标准效度、收敛效度和区分效度、内部一致性信度和测试-再测信度:结果:根据 CFA 的结果,改编后的 PCSQ-14 在社区融入、社区参与和社区组织方面具有三因素解。该量表与抑郁有显著的相关性,从而证明了标准相关效度。量表的内部一致性为 0.90,因此具有收敛效度和区分效度。量表的测试-再测信度类内相关系数为 0.78:改编版 PCSQ-14 在评估中国老年人感知到的社区支持方面表现出良好的心理测量特性。改编后的 PCSQ-14 可以帮助研究人员确定中国老年人对社区支持的感知,也可以帮助从业人员和政策制定者为老年人制定有针对性的干预措施,并更有效地分配资源。
{"title":"Validation of the Perceived Community Support Questionnaire for Older Chinese.","authors":"Run-Ping Che, Mei-Chun Cheung, Juan Herrero","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae046","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnae046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Community support has a profound positive impact on older people's health and plays a crucial role in facilitating aging in place. This impact is particularly significant in the Chinese context, where community support can alleviate the pressure on traditional family caregiving. This study translated, adapted, and validated the perceived community support questionnaire (PCSQ) for use with older Chinese.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data for this validation study were collected from a cross-sectional survey of 1,064 Chinese aged 65 years and above. Following the cultural adaptation of the PCSQ-14, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine its factor structure. Criterion validity, convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability of the scale were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the CFA results, the adapted PCSQ-14 was found to have a 3-factor solution for community integration, community participation, and community organizations. The criterion-related validity was supported by its significant correlation with depression. Convergent and discriminant validity were established, with the internal consistency of the scale being 0.90. The test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficient for the scale was 0.78.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The adapted version of the PCSQ-14 demonstrated promising psychometric properties in assessing perceived community support in older Chinese. The adapted PCSQ-14 could assist researchers in determining older Chinese adults' perceptions of community support, and could also assist practitioners and policymakers in developing targeted services for older people and allocating resources more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140960626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PIECES of My RELATIONSHIPS: The Cultural Adaptation of a Biographical Assessment Tool for Indigenous Older Adults in Canada. 我的关系片段:加拿大土著老年人传记评估工具的文化适应性。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad176
Kristen Jacklin, Karen Pitawanakwat, Melissa Blind, Dana Ketcher, Louise Jones, Emily Piraino, Monica Bretzlaff

Background and objectives: Healthcare services are rarely designed to meet the needs of Indigenous people, resulting in culturally unsafe care and assessment tools. This paper describes a collaboration between North East Behavioural Supports Ontario (NEBSO), university researchers, and Indigenous communities to adapt a biographical assessment tool used by NEBSO to be culturally appropriate and safe for Indigenous older adults (55+) in long-term care facilities in Ontario, Canada.

Research design and methods: Over 36 months, this project applied an Indigenized, community-based participatory research (CBPR) and cultural safety framework to the adaptation process. Qualitative data sources include the guidance of an Indigenous Elder, an Anishinaabe Language Expert Group, and focus groups conducted along the North Shore of Lake Huron, Sudbury, and Cochrane, Ontario.

Results: The adapted tool shifts the focus from personhood to relationships, includes culturally relevant domains, and supports trauma-informed approaches. Five themes were identified during the adaptation process: (1) practicing a relational approach to care, (2) valuing Indigenous language, (3) understanding Indigenous trauma, (4) respecting cultural values and understandings, and (5) addressing systemic barriers to culturally safe care.

Discussion and implications: Themes elucidated from this research process can inform future studies adapting mainstream practice tools and developing new tools for Indigenous populations. The collaboration and approach to this adaptation process demonstrated how cultural safety at systemic and practice levels can be addressed through CPBR partnerships between universities, organizations, and Indigenous communities. Findings support the need to evaluate the cultural safety of other assessments for older Indigenous adults in health care settings.

背景和目标:医疗保健服务的设计很少能满足原住民的需求,导致医疗保健和评估工具在文化上不安全。本文介绍了安大略省东北行为支持中心(NEBSO)、大学研究人员和原住民社区之间的合作,对 NEBSO 使用的传记评估工具进行调整,使其在文化上适合加拿大安大略省长期护理机构中的原住民老年人(55 岁以上),并确保其安全性:该项目历时 36 个月,在改编过程中采用了土著化、基于社区的参与式研究 (CBPR) 和文化安全框架。定性数据来源包括一位土著长老的指导、一个阿尼西纳比语言专家组以及沿休伦湖北岸、萨德伯里和安大略省科克伦进行的焦点小组讨论:结果:改编后的工具将重点从人格转移到了人际关系,包含了与文化相关的领域,并支持创伤知情方法。在改编过程中确定了五个主题:(1)实践关系护理方法;(2)重视土著语言;(3)理解土著创伤;(4)尊重文化价值观和理解;以及(5)解决文化安全护理的系统性障碍:从这一研究过程中阐明的主题可以为今后针对土著居民改编主流实践工具和开发新工具的研究提供参考。改编过程中的合作和方法展示了如何通过大学、组织和原住民社区之间的 CPBR 合作伙伴关系来解决系统和实践层面的文化安全问题。研究结果表明,有必要对医疗机构中针对土著老年人的其他评估的文化安全性进行评估。
{"title":"PIECES of My RELATIONSHIPS: The Cultural Adaptation of a Biographical Assessment Tool for Indigenous Older Adults in Canada.","authors":"Kristen Jacklin, Karen Pitawanakwat, Melissa Blind, Dana Ketcher, Louise Jones, Emily Piraino, Monica Bretzlaff","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnad176","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnad176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Healthcare services are rarely designed to meet the needs of Indigenous people, resulting in culturally unsafe care and assessment tools. This paper describes a collaboration between North East Behavioural Supports Ontario (NEBSO), university researchers, and Indigenous communities to adapt a biographical assessment tool used by NEBSO to be culturally appropriate and safe for Indigenous older adults (55+) in long-term care facilities in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Over 36 months, this project applied an Indigenized, community-based participatory research (CBPR) and cultural safety framework to the adaptation process. Qualitative data sources include the guidance of an Indigenous Elder, an Anishinaabe Language Expert Group, and focus groups conducted along the North Shore of Lake Huron, Sudbury, and Cochrane, Ontario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adapted tool shifts the focus from personhood to relationships, includes culturally relevant domains, and supports trauma-informed approaches. Five themes were identified during the adaptation process: (1) practicing a relational approach to care, (2) valuing Indigenous language, (3) understanding Indigenous trauma, (4) respecting cultural values and understandings, and (5) addressing systemic barriers to culturally safe care.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Themes elucidated from this research process can inform future studies adapting mainstream practice tools and developing new tools for Indigenous populations. The collaboration and approach to this adaptation process demonstrated how cultural safety at systemic and practice levels can be addressed through CPBR partnerships between universities, organizations, and Indigenous communities. Findings support the need to evaluate the cultural safety of other assessments for older Indigenous adults in health care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11194628/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139049756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Subjective Successful Aging Predicts Probability of Mortality Over 9 Years Among Adults Aged 50-74. 主观成功老龄化预测50-74岁成年人9年以上死亡率。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad148
Rachel Pruchno, Laura P Sands, Francine P Cartwright, Miriam Rose, Xiaofan Zhu

Background and objectives: Although the relationship between mortality and objective successful aging (health, functional ability, social engagement) is clear, the relationship between subjective successful aging (SSA) and mortality is inconclusive. Building on the broader literature regarding psychological well-being, these analyses examine the relationship between SSA and mortality, adjusting for demographic, health, and lifestyle characteristics with known mortality risks.

Research design and methods: We analyzed self-report data collected between 2006 and 2008 from 5,483 people. In addition to demographic, health, and lifestyle variables, we measured SSA using a valid, reliable measure. Over the course of 3,285 days, 695 people died. We computed 4 sequential Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between SSA and time to death. The first model included only SSA; Model 2 added demographic characteristics; Model 3 added health characteristics; Model 4 added lifestyle characteristics.

Results: We found that SSA had a significant association with mortality, accounting for known mortality risk factors. Each 1-point rise in SSA decreased the risk of mortality by 3% (0.97; 95% confidence interval = 0.95-0.99; p < .05). The probability of death within 9 years for persons with SSA scores from 0 to 5 was 45%; for persons with SSA scores from 25 to 30, risk of mortality was less than 10%.

Discussion and implications: Findings provide evidence that lower SSA scores reveal greater risk for mortality beyond demographic, health, and lifestyle variables. A brief assessment of SSA can provide unique clinical information and be used to identify people who might benefit from interventions to reduce mortality risk.

背景和目标:尽管死亡率与客观成功老龄化(健康、功能能力、社会参与)之间的关系是明确的,但主观成功老龄化与死亡率之间的关系并不确定。在关于心理健康的更广泛文献的基础上,这些分析考察了SSA与死亡率之间的关系,并根据已知死亡风险的人口统计学、健康和生活方式特征进行了调整。研究设计和方法:我们分析了2006年至2008年间收集的5483人的自我报告数据。除了人口统计学、健康和生活方式变量外,我们还使用有效、可靠的测量方法来测量SSA。在3285天的时间里,695人死亡。我们计算了四个连续的Cox比例风险模型来检验SSA与死亡时间之间的关系。第一个模型只包括SSA;模式2增加了人口特征;模型3增加了健康特征;Model 4增加了生活方式的特点。结果:考虑到已知的死亡风险因素,我们发现SSA与死亡率有显著相关性。SSA每上升一个百分点,死亡率就会降低3%(0.97;95%可信区间=0.95-0.99;p讨论和意义:研究结果提供了证据,表明较低的SSA评分表明,除人口统计学、健康和生活方式变量外,死亡风险更大。对SSA的简短评估可以提供独特的临床信息,并可用于确定哪些人可能从干预措施中受益,以降低死亡风险。
{"title":"Subjective Successful Aging Predicts Probability of Mortality Over 9 Years Among Adults Aged 50-74.","authors":"Rachel Pruchno, Laura P Sands, Francine P Cartwright, Miriam Rose, Xiaofan Zhu","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnad148","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnad148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although the relationship between mortality and objective successful aging (health, functional ability, social engagement) is clear, the relationship between subjective successful aging (SSA) and mortality is inconclusive. Building on the broader literature regarding psychological well-being, these analyses examine the relationship between SSA and mortality, adjusting for demographic, health, and lifestyle characteristics with known mortality risks.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed self-report data collected between 2006 and 2008 from 5,483 people. In addition to demographic, health, and lifestyle variables, we measured SSA using a valid, reliable measure. Over the course of 3,285 days, 695 people died. We computed 4 sequential Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between SSA and time to death. The first model included only SSA; Model 2 added demographic characteristics; Model 3 added health characteristics; Model 4 added lifestyle characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that SSA had a significant association with mortality, accounting for known mortality risk factors. Each 1-point rise in SSA decreased the risk of mortality by 3% (0.97; 95% confidence interval = 0.95-0.99; p < .05). The probability of death within 9 years for persons with SSA scores from 0 to 5 was 45%; for persons with SSA scores from 25 to 30, risk of mortality was less than 10%.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings provide evidence that lower SSA scores reveal greater risk for mortality beyond demographic, health, and lifestyle variables. A brief assessment of SSA can provide unique clinical information and be used to identify people who might benefit from interventions to reduce mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50163725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceptions of Hospital Care for Persons With Dementia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Social Media Sentiment Analysis. 新冠肺炎大流行期间对痴呆症患者医院护理的认知:社交媒体情绪分析。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad155
Alixe Ménard, Tracey O'Sullivan, Michael Mulvey, Christopher Belanger, Sarah Fraser

Background and objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to many hospital service disruptions and strict visitor restrictions that affected care of older adult populations. This study investigates perceptions of hospital care for persons with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic as shared on Reddit's social media platform.

Research design and methods: This study combined an Opinion Mining Framework with linguistic processing to conduct a sentiment analysis of word clusters and care-based content in a sample of 1,205 posts shared between February 2020 and March 2023 in Reddit's English-language corpus. Data were classified based on reoccurring contiguous sequences of 2 words from our text sample.

Results: Hospital dementia care discourse on Reddit advanced 4 negative sentiment themes: (1) fear of poor medication management, hydration, and hygiene, (2) loss of patient advocacy, (3) precipitation of advance directive discussions, and (4) delayed discharge and loss of nursing home bed. One positive sentiment theme also emerged: gratitude toward hospital staff.

Discussion and implications: Negative sentiment Reddit posts constituted a larger share of the posts than positive posts regarding hospital care for persons with dementia. People who posted about their experiences shared their concerns about hospital care deficiencies and the importance of including informal caregivers in hospital settings, particularly in the context of a pandemic. Implications exist for dementia training, improved quality of care, advance care planning, and transitions in care policies.

背景和目标:新冠肺炎大流行导致许多医院服务中断和严格的访客限制,影响了老年人的护理。这项研究调查了新冠肺炎大流行期间对痴呆症患者医院护理的看法,并在Reddit的社交媒体平台上分享。研究设计和方法:本研究将意见挖掘框架与语言处理相结合,对Reddit英语语料库中2020年2月至2023年3月期间分享的1205篇帖子样本中的词簇和基于关怀的内容进行情感分析。根据我们文本样本中两个单词的重复出现的连续序列对数据进行分类。结果:Reddit上的医院痴呆症护理讨论提出了四个负面情绪主题:(1)对药物管理、水合作用和卫生不良的恐惧,(2)缺乏患者宣传,(3)预先指导讨论的沉淀,以及(4)延迟出院和失去疗养院床位。一个积极的情感主题也出现了:感谢医院工作人员。讨论和含义:在关于痴呆症患者医院护理的帖子中,负面情绪Reddit帖子所占比例高于正面帖子。发布自己经历的人分享了他们对医院护理不足的担忧,以及在医院环境中包括非正式护理人员的重要性,特别是在疫情背景下。这对痴呆症培训、提高护理质量、提前护理规划和护理政策转变都有影响。
{"title":"Perceptions of Hospital Care for Persons With Dementia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Social Media Sentiment Analysis.","authors":"Alixe Ménard, Tracey O'Sullivan, Michael Mulvey, Christopher Belanger, Sarah Fraser","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnad155","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnad155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to many hospital service disruptions and strict visitor restrictions that affected care of older adult populations. This study investigates perceptions of hospital care for persons with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic as shared on Reddit's social media platform.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study combined an Opinion Mining Framework with linguistic processing to conduct a sentiment analysis of word clusters and care-based content in a sample of 1,205 posts shared between February 2020 and March 2023 in Reddit's English-language corpus. Data were classified based on reoccurring contiguous sequences of 2 words from our text sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital dementia care discourse on Reddit advanced 4 negative sentiment themes: (1) fear of poor medication management, hydration, and hygiene, (2) loss of patient advocacy, (3) precipitation of advance directive discussions, and (4) delayed discharge and loss of nursing home bed. One positive sentiment theme also emerged: gratitude toward hospital staff.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Negative sentiment Reddit posts constituted a larger share of the posts than positive posts regarding hospital care for persons with dementia. People who posted about their experiences shared their concerns about hospital care deficiencies and the importance of including informal caregivers in hospital settings, particularly in the context of a pandemic. Implications exist for dementia training, improved quality of care, advance care planning, and transitions in care policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72016117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Paid Caregiving in Dementia Care Over Time: Paid Caregiver, Family Caregiver, and Geriatrician Perspectives. 痴呆症护理中的有偿护理随时间变化:有偿照护者、家庭照护者和老年病学家的观点。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae055
Jennifer M Reckrey, Deborah Watman, Sasha Perez, Emily Franzosa, Katherine A Ornstein, Emma Tsui

Background and objectives: As long-term care increasingly moves from facilities to the community, paid caregivers (e.g., home health aides, other home care workers) will play an increasingly important role in the care of people with dementia. This study explores the paid caregiver role in home-based dementia care and how that role changes over time.

Research design and methods: We conducted individual, longitudinal interviews with the paid caregiver, family caregiver, and geriatrician of 9 people with moderate-to-severe dementia in the community; the 29 total participants were interviewed on average 3 times over 6 months, for a total of 75 interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with structured case summaries and framework analysis.

Results: Paid caregivers took on distinct roles in the care of each client with dementia. Despite changes in care needs over the study period, roles remained consistent. Paid caregivers, family caregivers, and geriatricians described the central role of families in driving the paid caregiver role. Paid and family caregivers collaborated in the day-to-day care of people with dementia; paid caregivers described their emotional relationships with those they cared for.

Discussion and implications: Rather than simply providing functional support, paid caregivers provide nuanced care tailored to the needs and preferences of not only each person with dementia (i.e., person-centered care), but also their family caregivers (i.e., family-centered care). Deliberate cultivation of person-centered and family-centered home care may help maximize the positive impact of paid caregivers on people with dementia and their families.

背景和目标:随着长期护理越来越多地从机构转移到社区,有偿护理人员(如家庭健康助理、其他家庭护理人员)在痴呆症患者的护理中将扮演越来越重要的角色。本研究探讨了带薪护理人员在家庭痴呆症护理中的角色,以及这种角色如何随着时间的推移而发生变化:我们对 9 名社区中度至重度痴呆症患者的有偿照护者、家庭照护者和老年病医生进行了个人纵向访谈;总共 29 名参与者在 6 个月内平均接受了 3 次访谈,共进行了 75 次访谈。对访谈进行了记录、转录,并通过结构化案例摘要和框架分析进行了分析:有偿照护者在照护每位痴呆症患者的过程中都扮演了不同的角色。尽管在研究期间护理需求发生了变化,但角色却保持一致。有偿照护者、家庭照护者和老年病学家都描述了家庭在有偿照护者角色中的核心作用。有偿照护者和家庭照护者在痴呆症患者的日常照护中相互协作;有偿照护者描述了他们与所照护患者之间的情感关系:有偿照护者不仅要提供功能性支持,还要根据每位痴呆症患者(即以人为本的照护)及其家庭照护者(即以家庭为本的照护)的需求和偏好提供细致入微的照护。有意识地培养以人为本和以家庭为本的家庭护理,可能有助于最大限度地发挥带薪护理人员对痴呆症患者及其家庭的积极影响。
{"title":"Paid Caregiving in Dementia Care Over Time: Paid Caregiver, Family Caregiver, and Geriatrician Perspectives.","authors":"Jennifer M Reckrey, Deborah Watman, Sasha Perez, Emily Franzosa, Katherine A Ornstein, Emma Tsui","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae055","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnae055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>As long-term care increasingly moves from facilities to the community, paid caregivers (e.g., home health aides, other home care workers) will play an increasingly important role in the care of people with dementia. This study explores the paid caregiver role in home-based dementia care and how that role changes over time.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted individual, longitudinal interviews with the paid caregiver, family caregiver, and geriatrician of 9 people with moderate-to-severe dementia in the community; the 29 total participants were interviewed on average 3 times over 6 months, for a total of 75 interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with structured case summaries and framework analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paid caregivers took on distinct roles in the care of each client with dementia. Despite changes in care needs over the study period, roles remained consistent. Paid caregivers, family caregivers, and geriatricians described the central role of families in driving the paid caregiver role. Paid and family caregivers collaborated in the day-to-day care of people with dementia; paid caregivers described their emotional relationships with those they cared for.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Rather than simply providing functional support, paid caregivers provide nuanced care tailored to the needs and preferences of not only each person with dementia (i.e., person-centered care), but also their family caregivers (i.e., family-centered care). Deliberate cultivation of person-centered and family-centered home care may help maximize the positive impact of paid caregivers on people with dementia and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217903/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141094652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using the Age-Friendly Environment Framework to Assess Advance Care Planning Factors Among Older Adults With Limited Income: A Cross-Sectional, Descriptive Survey Study. 使用 "老年友好环境 "框架评估收入有限的老年人的预先护理规划因素:一项横断面描述性调查研究。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae059
Christine Cleary Kimpel, Mary S Dietrich, Jana Lauderdale, David G Schlundt, Cathy A Maxwell

Background and objectives: The World Health Organization created the Age-Friendly Environment (AFE) framework to design communities that support healthy aging and equitable decision making. This framework's resource domains may account for disparately lower advance care planning (ACP) among older adults with limited incomes compared to those with high incomes. We aimed to describe and examine associations of AFE factors with ACP.

Research design and methods: We recruited and conducted cross-sectional surveys among older adults with limited incomes in 7 community-based settings in Nashville, TN. ACP and AFE item scales were dichotomized and analyzed with unadjusted phi correlation coefficients.

Results: Survey participants (N = 100) included 59 women, 70 Black/African American, and 70 ≥60 years old. Most participants agreed that their community was age friendly (≥58%) and varied in ACP participation (22%-67%). Participants who perceived easy travel and service access and sufficient social isolation outreach were more likely to have had family or doctor quality-of-life discussions (phi = 0.22-0.29, p < .05). Having a healthcare decision maker was positively associated with age-friendly travel, housing, and meet-up places (phi = 0.20-0.26, p < .05).

Discussion and implications: The AFE framework is useful for exploring the environmental factors of ACP, but further research is warranted to identify specific and immediate resources to support successful ACP among populations with socioeconomic disadvantage.

背景和目标:世界卫生组织创建了老年友好环境(AFE)框架,以设计支持健康老龄化和公平决策的社区。与高收入人群相比,收入有限的老年人的预先护理计划(ACP)水平较低,这可能与该框架的资源领域有关。我们的目的是描述和研究 AFE 因素与 ACP 的关联:我们在田纳西州纳什维尔市的七个社区招募了收入有限的老年人,并对他们进行了横断面调查。我们对 ACP 和 AFE 项目量表进行了二分,并用未调整的 phi 相关系数进行了分析:调查参与者(N=100)包括 59 名女性、70 名黑人/非洲裔美国人和 70 名年龄≥60 岁的人。大多数参与者都认为他们所在的社区是对老年人友好的(≥58%),在参与 ACP 方面各不相同(22%-67%)。认为出行和服务便利、社会隔离外联充分的参与者更有可能与家人或医生讨论过生活质量问题(phi=.22 至 .29,p 讨论和启示:AFE 框架有助于探索 ACP 的环境因素,但仍需进一步研究,以确定具体和直接的资源,支持社会经济弱势人群成功开展 ACP。
{"title":"Using the Age-Friendly Environment Framework to Assess Advance Care Planning Factors Among Older Adults With Limited Income: A Cross-Sectional, Descriptive Survey Study.","authors":"Christine Cleary Kimpel, Mary S Dietrich, Jana Lauderdale, David G Schlundt, Cathy A Maxwell","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae059","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnae059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The World Health Organization created the Age-Friendly Environment (AFE) framework to design communities that support healthy aging and equitable decision making. This framework's resource domains may account for disparately lower advance care planning (ACP) among older adults with limited incomes compared to those with high incomes. We aimed to describe and examine associations of AFE factors with ACP.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We recruited and conducted cross-sectional surveys among older adults with limited incomes in 7 community-based settings in Nashville, TN. ACP and AFE item scales were dichotomized and analyzed with unadjusted phi correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey participants (N = 100) included 59 women, 70 Black/African American, and 70 ≥60 years old. Most participants agreed that their community was age friendly (≥58%) and varied in ACP participation (22%-67%). Participants who perceived easy travel and service access and sufficient social isolation outreach were more likely to have had family or doctor quality-of-life discussions (phi = 0.22-0.29, p < .05). Having a healthcare decision maker was positively associated with age-friendly travel, housing, and meet-up places (phi = 0.20-0.26, p < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The AFE framework is useful for exploring the environmental factors of ACP, but further research is warranted to identify specific and immediate resources to support successful ACP among populations with socioeconomic disadvantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192857/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141176586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Facility-Level Analysis of Nursing Home Compare's Five-Star Rating and Maryland's Family Satisfaction with Care Survey. 疗养院比较五星评级和马里兰州家庭护理满意度调查的设施层面分析。
IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad166
Nancy Kusmaul, Roberto J Millar, Christin Diehl, Ian Stockwell

Background and objectives: Nursing facilities care for individuals with cognitive and/or physical disabilities. Poor quality is associated with greater disease and mortality. Quality comprises many factors and different stakeholders value different factors. This study aimed to compare two care quality frameworks, one based on observable factors and one on family satisfaction.

Research design and methods: We merged publicly available 2021 Maryland nursing facility data. The Maryland Health Care Commission surveys long-term care residents' family satisfaction across seven domains. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) 5-star ratings aggregate inspections, staffing, and quality measures. We used univariate and bivariate statistics to compare the frameworks.

Results: The data set included 220 facilities and 4,610 survey respondents. The average facility rating was 7.70/10 and overall 77% of respondents would recommend the facility. Eighty-six percent of respondents from 5-star facilities, 79% from 4-star facilities, and 76% from 3-star facilities would recommend the facility compared to 65% from 1-star facilities (p < .001, p < .01, and p < .05, respectively). Four or 5-star facilities received significantly higher ratings (8.33, p < .001; 7.75, p < .05, respectively) than 1-star facilities (7.07).

Discussion and implications: Our results corroborated earlier findings of strong associations between CMS ratings and satisfaction at the extremes of the 5-star system. These associations are inconsistent across family-reported domains. This suggests overlap between the frameworks. CMS ratings address care quality; family satisfaction measures quality of life and care quality. High satisfaction is associated with high care quality and quality of life; lower satisfaction is associated with lower care quality.

背景和目标:护理机构为有认知障碍和/或肢体残疾的人提供护理。质量差与疾病和死亡率增加有关。质量由许多因素组成,不同的利益相关者重视不同的因素。本研究旨在比较两种护理质量框架,一种是基于可观察因素的框架,另一种是基于家庭满意度的框架:我们合并了公开的 2021 年马里兰州护理机构数据。马里兰州卫生保健委员会调查了长期护理居民家庭对七个领域的满意度。CMS 的五星评级综合了检查、人员配备和质量措施。我们使用单变量和双变量统计来比较这些框架:数据集包括 220 家机构和 4,610 名调查对象。设施的平均评分为 7.70/10,77% 的受访者会推荐该设施。86%的五星级医疗机构、79%的四星级医疗机构和 76%的三星级医疗机构的受访者会推荐该医疗机构,而一星级医疗机构的受访者只有 65%会推荐该医疗机构(分别为 p < 0.001、p < 0.01 和 p < 0.05)。四星级或五星级机构的评分(分别为 8.33,p < 0.001;7.75,p < 0.05)明显高于一星级机构(7.07):我们的研究结果证实了之前的研究结果,即在五星级系统的极端情况下,CMS 评级与满意度之间存在密切联系。这些关联在家庭报告的领域中并不一致。这表明两个框架之间存在重叠。CMS 评级针对的是护理质量,而家庭满意度衡量的是生活质量和护理质量。高满意度与高护理质量和生活质量相关;低满意度与低护理质量相关。
{"title":"A Facility-Level Analysis of Nursing Home Compare's Five-Star Rating and Maryland's Family Satisfaction with Care Survey.","authors":"Nancy Kusmaul, Roberto J Millar, Christin Diehl, Ian Stockwell","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnad166","DOIUrl":"10.1093/geront/gnad166","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Nursing facilities care for individuals with cognitive and/or physical disabilities. Poor quality is associated with greater disease and mortality. Quality comprises many factors and different stakeholders value different factors. This study aimed to compare two care quality frameworks, one based on observable factors and one on family satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We merged publicly available 2021 Maryland nursing facility data. The Maryland Health Care Commission surveys long-term care residents' family satisfaction across seven domains. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) 5-star ratings aggregate inspections, staffing, and quality measures. We used univariate and bivariate statistics to compare the frameworks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data set included 220 facilities and 4,610 survey respondents. The average facility rating was 7.70/10 and overall 77% of respondents would recommend the facility. Eighty-six percent of respondents from 5-star facilities, 79% from 4-star facilities, and 76% from 3-star facilities would recommend the facility compared to 65% from 1-star facilities (p < .001, p < .01, and p < .05, respectively). Four or 5-star facilities received significantly higher ratings (8.33, p < .001; 7.75, p < .05, respectively) than 1-star facilities (7.07).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Our results corroborated earlier findings of strong associations between CMS ratings and satisfaction at the extremes of the 5-star system. These associations are inconsistent across family-reported domains. This suggests overlap between the frameworks. CMS ratings address care quality; family satisfaction measures quality of life and care quality. High satisfaction is associated with high care quality and quality of life; lower satisfaction is associated with lower care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138810155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Gerontologist
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1