Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-21DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106526
Stella Seyb , Dean A. Shepherd , Sally Maitlis
<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>This paper introduces the concept of meaningful venturing, which refers to entrepreneurial action that generates a sense of meaning in life for the entrepreneur. Although entrepreneurs have considerable freedom to create meaning in life through their venturing, they appear to struggle to do so. To address this tension, we theorize about how entrepreneurs can generate meaningful venturing and the tradeoffs that may arise during this process. The emerging framework of meaningful venturing offers four pathways based on differences in nascent entrepreneurs’ motivation and knowledge. For each pathway, we explain the tradeoffs that the focal entrepreneur is most likely to experience between the three facets of meaning in life. We then explain how each entrepreneur might resolve these tradeoffs to generate fully-meaningful venturing by taking specific schema-enhancing action that would be less effective for the other entrepreneurs. Overall, the framework contributes to the entrepreneurship literature by providing new insights into how meaningful venturing manifests, why entrepreneurs exploring the same opportunity may experience different tradeoffs, and how different entrepreneurs might generate fully-meaningful venturing. Additionally, we offer possibilities for future research at the intersection of meaningful venturing, and the literatures on entrepreneurial identity, well-being, and passion.</div></div><div><h3>Executive summary</h3><div>Because entrepreneurship provides founders with the freedom to enact their personal vision, entrepreneurs have high potential to generate meaning in life for themselves through their venturing. However, they often struggle to do so. We introduce the concept of meaningful venturing to encompass entrepreneurial action that generates a sense of meaning in life for the entrepreneur. To theorize about how entrepreneurs generate meaning in life, we integrate the psychology literature on meaning in life with the entrepreneurship literature, emphasizing how entrepreneurial action theory (McMullen and Shepherd, 2006) can be a helpful theoretical lens for examining meaningful venturing.</div><div>We develop a framework of meaningful venturing that contains four pathways based on nascent entrepreneurs' initial motivation and knowledge and the entrepreneurial action they engage in to reduce perceived uncertainty. Each pathway contains different tradeoffs between the three formative facets of meaning in life — a sense of purpose, mattering, and comprehension. These tradeoffs suggest unique ways for each entrepreneur to generate fully-meaningful venturing that would not be effective for the other entrepreneurs.</div><div>Overall, the framework of meaningful venturing contributes to the entrepreneurship literature by providing new insights into how meaningful venturing manifests, what causes it, and how it can progress for different entrepreneurs. To expand the theoretical relevance of the meaningful ven
摘要本文引入了“有意义创业”的概念,指的是让创业者产生人生意义感的创业行为。尽管企业家有相当大的自由,可以通过他们的冒险创造生活的意义,但他们似乎很难做到这一点。为了解决这种紧张关系,我们对企业家如何进行有意义的冒险以及在此过程中可能出现的权衡进行了理论化。新兴的有意义创业的框架基于新兴企业家的动机和知识差异提供了四条途径。对于每一条路径,我们解释了专注的企业家最有可能在生活意义的三个方面之间经历的权衡。然后,我们解释了每个企业家如何通过采取对其他企业家不太有效的特定模式增强行动来解决这些权衡,以产生完全有意义的冒险。总体而言,该框架对创业文献的贡献在于,它为以下问题提供了新的见解:有意义的创业是如何表现出来的,为什么探索相同机会的企业家可能会经历不同的权衡,以及不同的企业家如何可能产生完全有意义的创业。此外,我们还提供了未来研究的可能性,包括有意义的创业,以及关于创业认同、幸福感和激情的文献。因为创业为创始人提供了实现个人愿景的自由,企业家有很大的潜力通过他们的冒险为自己的生活创造意义。然而,他们往往很难做到这一点。我们引入了有意义的冒险的概念,以包含企业家的行动,产生一种意义在生活的企业家。为了理论化企业家如何在生活中产生意义,我们将关于生活意义的心理学文献与创业学文献结合起来,强调创业行动理论(McMullen and Shepherd, 2006)如何成为检验有意义创业的有益理论视角。我们开发了一个有意义的创业框架,该框架包含四种途径,基于新兴企业家的初始动机和知识,以及他们参与的创业行动,以减少感知的不确定性。每条道路都包含着人生意义形成的三个方面——目标感、重要性和理解力之间的不同权衡。这些权衡为每个企业家提供了独特的方式来产生对其他企业家无效的完全有意义的风险投资。总体而言,有意义的风险投资框架通过提供关于有意义的风险投资如何表现,导致它的原因以及它如何在不同的企业家中发展的新见解,为创业文献做出了贡献。为了拓展有意义的创业概念的理论相关性,我们讨论了将有意义的创业与创业中关于身份、幸福感和激情的现有文献整合的潜力。通过这一研究议程,我们强调了有意义的风险投资如何为创业奖学金提供令人兴奋的可能性。
{"title":"Meaningful venturing: Examining how entrepreneurs generate meaning in life","authors":"Stella Seyb , Dean A. Shepherd , Sally Maitlis","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106526","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106526","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>This paper introduces the concept of meaningful venturing, which refers to entrepreneurial action that generates a sense of meaning in life for the entrepreneur. Although entrepreneurs have considerable freedom to create meaning in life through their venturing, they appear to struggle to do so. To address this tension, we theorize about how entrepreneurs can generate meaningful venturing and the tradeoffs that may arise during this process. The emerging framework of meaningful venturing offers four pathways based on differences in nascent entrepreneurs’ motivation and knowledge. For each pathway, we explain the tradeoffs that the focal entrepreneur is most likely to experience between the three facets of meaning in life. We then explain how each entrepreneur might resolve these tradeoffs to generate fully-meaningful venturing by taking specific schema-enhancing action that would be less effective for the other entrepreneurs. Overall, the framework contributes to the entrepreneurship literature by providing new insights into how meaningful venturing manifests, why entrepreneurs exploring the same opportunity may experience different tradeoffs, and how different entrepreneurs might generate fully-meaningful venturing. Additionally, we offer possibilities for future research at the intersection of meaningful venturing, and the literatures on entrepreneurial identity, well-being, and passion.</div></div><div><h3>Executive summary</h3><div>Because entrepreneurship provides founders with the freedom to enact their personal vision, entrepreneurs have high potential to generate meaning in life for themselves through their venturing. However, they often struggle to do so. We introduce the concept of meaningful venturing to encompass entrepreneurial action that generates a sense of meaning in life for the entrepreneur. To theorize about how entrepreneurs generate meaning in life, we integrate the psychology literature on meaning in life with the entrepreneurship literature, emphasizing how entrepreneurial action theory (McMullen and Shepherd, 2006) can be a helpful theoretical lens for examining meaningful venturing.</div><div>We develop a framework of meaningful venturing that contains four pathways based on nascent entrepreneurs' initial motivation and knowledge and the entrepreneurial action they engage in to reduce perceived uncertainty. Each pathway contains different tradeoffs between the three formative facets of meaning in life — a sense of purpose, mattering, and comprehension. These tradeoffs suggest unique ways for each entrepreneur to generate fully-meaningful venturing that would not be effective for the other entrepreneurs.</div><div>Overall, the framework of meaningful venturing contributes to the entrepreneurship literature by providing new insights into how meaningful venturing manifests, what causes it, and how it can progress for different entrepreneurs. To expand the theoretical relevance of the meaningful ven","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 106526"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144679494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106525
Abu Zafar M. Shahriar , Sarah R. Chase , Dean Shepherd
{"title":"Financial inclusion and low-income women's new venture initiation: A Field experiment","authors":"Abu Zafar M. Shahriar , Sarah R. Chase , Dean Shepherd","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106525","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106525","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 106525"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144571324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-06-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106519
Jordan J. McSweeney , Kevin T. McSweeney , Thomas H. Allison , Aaron H. Anglin
Entrepreneurial pitching research has grown substantially over the last several decades. Despite this growth, prior research remains highly fragmented leaving us with a lack of conceptual clarity regarding what entrepreneurial pitching entails and how it unfolds over time. To address these issues, we conduct a systematic literature review of 173 articles examining entrepreneurial pitching from 2000 until 2024. Our review offers three important contributions to the entrepreneurship literature. First, we develop a process model of entrepreneurial pitching that provides a more holistic understanding of how entrepreneurial pitching unfolds over time by categorizing the 15 topics we identified into four stages: Pre-Pitch, Pitching, Post-Pitch, and Evaluation. Second, we leverage our review and integrative process model of entrepreneurial pitching to provide a roadmap to help guide future research. Third, we develop an integrative definition of entrepreneurial pitching that can conceptually anchor future studies.
{"title":"The entrepreneurial pitching process: A systematic review using topic modeling and future research agenda","authors":"Jordan J. McSweeney , Kevin T. McSweeney , Thomas H. Allison , Aaron H. Anglin","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106519","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106519","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Entrepreneurial pitching research has grown substantially over the last several decades. Despite this growth, prior research remains highly fragmented leaving us with a lack of conceptual clarity regarding what entrepreneurial pitching entails and how it unfolds over time. To address these issues, we conduct a systematic literature review of 173 articles examining entrepreneurial pitching from 2000 until 2024. Our review offers three important contributions to the entrepreneurship literature. First, we develop a process model of entrepreneurial pitching that provides a more holistic understanding of how entrepreneurial pitching unfolds over time by categorizing the 15 topics we identified into four stages: Pre-Pitch, Pitching, Post-Pitch, and Evaluation. Second, we leverage our review and integrative process model of entrepreneurial pitching to provide a roadmap to help guide future research. Third, we develop an integrative definition of entrepreneurial pitching that can conceptually anchor future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 106519"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144365399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106523
Chanchal Balachandran , Karl Wennberg
While resource-dependency theories suggest that heterogenous directors in new venture boards contribute important knowledge and networks, research on boardroom homophily highlights that dissimilar directors are more likely to leave, especially under adverse conditions. To date, there is limited evidence on whether such mechanisms also prevail in the venture context where founder-managers retain excessive control over director appointments. We analyze director tenure in 28,295 Swedish ventures, finding that dissimilar directors are more likely to leave the board when ventures are operating in favorable conditions but only when considering knowledge diversity. Post-hoc analyses of directors' post-exit career paths and qualitative interviews with CEOs and directors help clarify the mechanisms that cause diverse directors to depart venture boards more often. Specifically, lifecycle demands and venture profitability ease resource-dependence pressures on director retention, thus feeding homogeneity in board expertise. Our findings provide insights into the homogenizing nature of new ventures' upper echelons as they evolve into mature organizations.
Executive summary
Boards are a vital resource for early-stage ventures, offering advice, funding connections, and strategic guidance — especially when directors bring diverse expertise. Yet, as ventures grow and succeed, that diversity can erode. Our study of over 28,000 Swedish owner-managed firms shows that directors whose expertise differs from that of the founder(s) are more likely to leave—not during hardship, but when the business is performing well. Interviews with several founders and directors further suggest that as ventures mature, they increasingly rely on internal capabilities and shift toward boards that reflect the founder's evolving preferences. These dynamics lead to more homogenous boards over time, potentially narrowing the range of perspectives available in the board. For founders and policymakers, the findings highlight a key challenge: keeping diverse directors around not just at the start, but as the company scales.
{"title":"Director turnover in new venture boards: From homophilous to resource-contingent processes","authors":"Chanchal Balachandran , Karl Wennberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106523","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106523","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While resource-dependency theories suggest that heterogenous directors in new venture boards contribute important knowledge and networks, research on boardroom homophily highlights that dissimilar directors are more likely to leave, especially under adverse conditions. To date, there is limited evidence on whether such mechanisms also prevail in the venture context where founder-managers retain excessive control over director appointments. We analyze director tenure in 28,295 Swedish ventures, finding that dissimilar directors are more likely to leave the board when ventures are operating in favorable conditions but only when considering knowledge diversity. Post-hoc analyses of directors' post-exit career paths and qualitative interviews with CEOs and directors help clarify the mechanisms that cause diverse directors to depart venture boards more often. Specifically, lifecycle demands and venture profitability ease resource-dependence pressures on director retention, thus feeding homogeneity in board expertise. Our findings provide insights into the homogenizing nature of new ventures' upper echelons as they evolve into mature organizations.</div></div><div><h3>Executive summary</h3><div>Boards are a vital resource for early-stage ventures, offering advice, funding connections, and strategic guidance — especially when directors bring diverse expertise. Yet, as ventures grow and succeed, that diversity can erode. Our study of over 28,000 Swedish owner-managed firms shows that directors whose expertise differs from that of the founder(s) are more likely to leave—not during hardship, but when the business is performing well. Interviews with several founders and directors further suggest that as ventures mature, they increasingly rely on internal capabilities and shift toward boards that reflect the founder's evolving preferences. These dynamics lead to more homogenous boards over time, potentially narrowing the range of perspectives available in the board. For founders and policymakers, the findings highlight a key challenge: keeping diverse directors around not just at the start, but as the company scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 106523"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144572659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article investigates the impact of obesity stereotypes on angel investment decisions. Drawing from the stereotype literature and expectancy violation theory, we propose that angel investors tend to evaluate founders with obesity worse because they perceive them as high in warmth but low in competence (and competence matters more for angel investors' evaluations). However, we also suggest that founders with obesity who violate low-competence stereotypes through high-competence displays can offset negative obesity stereotypes without affecting positive ones, leading to overall higher evaluations. The results from two field studies show that angel investors penalize founders with obesity but that the effect is ameliorated for those presenting high-tech ventures. A follow-up experiment using AI-generated, photorealistic manipulations of founders' body types identifies perceived competence and warmth as mechanisms that explain the effects. Collectively, these findings contribute to the literature streams on appearance in entrepreneurial finance, stereotypes and their violations, and entrepreneurial research methods.
{"title":"Not what you expected to see? Obesity stereotypes, expectancy violations, and angel investment decisions","authors":"Torben Antretter , Henrik Wesemann Lekkas , Djordje Djokovic , Vangelis Souitaris , Joakim Wincent","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106510","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106510","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article investigates the impact of obesity stereotypes on angel investment decisions. Drawing from the stereotype literature and expectancy violation theory, we propose that angel investors tend to evaluate founders with obesity worse because they perceive them as high in warmth but low in competence (and competence matters more for angel investors' evaluations). However, we also suggest that founders with obesity who violate low-competence stereotypes through high-competence displays can offset negative obesity stereotypes without affecting positive ones, leading to overall higher evaluations. The results from two field studies show that angel investors penalize founders with obesity but that the effect is ameliorated for those presenting high-tech ventures. A follow-up experiment using AI-generated, photorealistic manipulations of founders' body types identifies perceived competence and warmth as mechanisms that explain the effects. Collectively, these findings contribute to the literature streams on appearance in entrepreneurial finance, stereotypes and their violations, and entrepreneurial research methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 106510"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144549082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106522
Man Yang , Maria Ehrnström-Fuentes , Joakim Wincent
How can communities be active to create and scale opportunities for sustainable small and local businesses? We address this question through a longitudinal study of a community-based initiative, which promoted sustainability in food production and consumption and has scaled to different communities worldwide. To improve our understanding of the entrepreneurial role of communities, we observed how communities proactively engaged in processes evolving from replicating and developing community ventures to scaling community movement over time. Through these processes, we identified three mechanisms—infrastructure shift, nurturing, and sustaining infrastructure. Our research extends current theories of community-based entrepreneurship by offering a process perspective at the community level and elaborating how communities collectively create and scale opportunities for sustainable small and local businesses, allowing an idea to evolve from a small initiative to a large movement.
{"title":"Big things from small beginnings: Creating and scaling community-based opportunities for sustainable small and local businesses","authors":"Man Yang , Maria Ehrnström-Fuentes , Joakim Wincent","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106522","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106522","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How can communities be active to create and scale opportunities for sustainable small and local businesses? We address this question through a longitudinal study of a community-based initiative, which promoted sustainability in food production and consumption and has scaled to different communities worldwide. To improve our understanding of the entrepreneurial role of communities, we observed how communities proactively engaged in processes evolving from replicating and developing community ventures to scaling community movement over time. Through these processes, we identified three mechanisms—<em>infrastructure shift</em>, <em>nurturing</em>, and <em>sustaining infrastructure</em>. Our research extends current theories of community-based entrepreneurship by offering a process perspective at the community level and elaborating how communities collectively create and scale opportunities for sustainable small and local businesses, allowing an idea to evolve from a small initiative to a large movement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 106522"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144549083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-06-04DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106504
Zhiyan Wu , Lucia Naldi
This study investigates whether and how female directors influence the performance of male-led new ventures. Guided by resource dependence theory, which sees boards as providers of key resources and advice, we shift the focus adopted in prior research on female directors' strategic roles in public firms to argue that, in male-led new ventures, their influence is more operationally focused. Using data from Sweden and an instrumental variable approach that exploits the random assignment of a child's sex at birth among male founders, we find that greater female board representation is positively associated with the performance of male-led new ventures. Further analyses suggest this effect operates primarily through workforce development—namely, the hiring of skilled female employees and the provision of competitive compensation. Notably, even a single female director has a measurable impact. This study underscores the distinct role of female directors in entrepreneurial settings as opposed to established firms, illuminating the mechanisms through which female presence in the boardroom positively affects the early life stages of organizations. We hope our research serves as a basis for future research to explore further the roles played by female directors that are particularly relevant at the startup stage.
{"title":"Developing the workforce: Exploring the impact of female directors on male-led new ventures","authors":"Zhiyan Wu , Lucia Naldi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106504","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106504","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether and how female directors influence the performance of male-led new ventures. Guided by resource dependence theory, which sees boards as providers of key resources and advice, we shift the focus adopted in prior research on female directors' strategic roles in public firms to argue that, in male-led new ventures, their influence is more operationally focused. Using data from Sweden and an instrumental variable approach that exploits the random assignment of a child's sex at birth among male founders, we find that greater female board representation is positively associated with the performance of male-led new ventures. Further analyses suggest this effect operates primarily through workforce development—namely, the hiring of skilled female employees and the provision of competitive compensation. Notably, even a single female director has a measurable impact. This study underscores the distinct role of female directors in entrepreneurial settings as opposed to established firms, illuminating the mechanisms through which female presence in the boardroom positively affects the early life stages of organizations. We hope our research serves as a basis for future research to explore further the roles played by female directors that are particularly relevant at the startup stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 106504"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144212460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-03-17DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106486
Janice Byrne , Antonio Paco Giuliani
Hype is a collective vision and promise of a possible future, around which attention, excitement, and expectations increase over time (Logue & Grimes, 2022). Entrepreneurs employ cultural strategies, using framing to legitimize their endeavors and sustain the surrounding hype. Despite the importance of media in entrepreneurial hype, extant literature has yet to investigate media framing devices and how they shape and inform social expectations in the hype cycle. We also know that framing efforts are shaped by discursive struggles between actors (Kriechbaum et al., 2021) and that under-represented social groups are more constrained by dominant discourses. Yet, extant literature on entrepreneurial hype has thus far undertheorized power and inequality. We focus on one under-represented group - women – as they embody a glaring example of how media influence the social expectations associated with their entrepreneurial endeavors. Specifically, this study investigates how the media employ framing devices to generate social expectations for non-dominant groups (women entrepreneurs in our case) - and shape the hype cycle. To do so, we empirically analyze the evolution of the ‘girlboss’ hype, through a content analysis of 2671 media articles. Our contributions advance studies on entrepreneurial hype by explicating the role of media in the construction of hype. We contend that gender affords a critical power lens in the study of entrepreneurial hype that can be transferred to other contexts mired by inequality. We advance that feminist interrogations of media and entrepreneurship can contribute to understanding and addressing issues beyond gender.
炒作是对可能的未来的集体憧憬和承诺,随着时间的推移,围绕它的关注、兴奋和期望会不断增加(Logue & Grimes, 2022)。创业者采用文化策略,利用框架使他们的努力合法化,并维持周围的炒作。尽管媒体在创业炒作中非常重要,但现有文献尚未研究媒体的框架手段,以及它们如何在炒作周期中塑造和引导社会预期。我们还知道,构思工作是由参与者之间的话语斗争决定的(Kriechbaum et al.然而,迄今为止,有关创业炒作的现有文献对权力和不平等的理论研究不足。我们聚焦于一个代表性不足的群体--女性,因为她们是媒体如何影响与她们的创业努力相关的社会期望的一个鲜明例子。具体而言,本研究调查了媒体如何利用框架工具为非主导群体(在我们的案例中为女性创业者)创造社会期望,并形成炒作周期。为此,我们通过对 2671 篇媒体文章的内容分析,对 "女老板 "炒作的演变过程进行了实证分析。通过解释媒体在炒作过程中的作用,我们的贡献推动了有关创业炒作的研究。我们认为,性别为创业炒作研究提供了一个重要的权力视角,可以将其应用到其他不平等的环境中。我们认为,女性主义对媒体和创业的审视有助于理解和解决性别之外的问题。
{"title":"The rise and fall of the girlboss: Gender, social expectations and entrepreneurial hype","authors":"Janice Byrne , Antonio Paco Giuliani","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106486","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106486","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hype is a collective vision and promise of a possible future, around which attention, excitement, and expectations increase over time (Logue & Grimes, 2022). Entrepreneurs employ cultural strategies, using framing to legitimize their endeavors and sustain the surrounding hype. Despite the importance of media in entrepreneurial hype, extant literature has yet to investigate media framing devices and how they shape and inform social expectations in the hype cycle. We also know that framing efforts are shaped by discursive struggles between actors (Kriechbaum et al., 2021) and that under-represented social groups are more constrained by dominant discourses. Yet, extant literature on entrepreneurial hype has thus far undertheorized power and inequality. We focus on one under-represented group - women – as they embody a glaring example of how media influence the social expectations associated with their entrepreneurial endeavors. Specifically, this study investigates how the media employ framing devices to generate social expectations for non-dominant groups (women entrepreneurs in our case) - and shape the hype cycle. To do so, we empirically analyze the evolution of the ‘girlboss’ hype, through a content analysis of 2671 media articles. Our contributions advance studies on entrepreneurial hype by explicating the role of media in the construction of hype. We contend that gender affords a critical power lens in the study of entrepreneurial hype that can be transferred to other contexts mired by inequality. We advance that feminist interrogations of media and entrepreneurship can contribute to understanding and addressing issues beyond gender.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 4","pages":"Article 106486"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143637519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-03-20DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106497
Mark R. Mallon, Stav Fainshmidt
Research is needed to uncover the sociocultural influences of informal entrepreneurship, or starting a legally unregistered but otherwise legitimate business. Using the institutional logics perspective, we posit that ethnic fractionalization increases the likelihood that entrepreneurs will not register their ventures because it fosters a clan logic and embeddedness in one's ethnic group. Entrepreneurs may not readily access knowledge regarding registration because the ethnic group can provide some of the benefits associated with registration. However, the clan logic is mitigated for entrepreneurs who receive advice from lawyers or businesspeople because these advisors are associated with the state or market logics, respectively, making knowledge of registration more accessible to entrepreneurs. We find support for these arguments using a sample of over 5000 entrepreneurs in 29 countries.
{"title":"Ethnic fractionalization and informal entrepreneurship: An institutional logics perspective","authors":"Mark R. Mallon, Stav Fainshmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106497","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106497","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research is needed to uncover the sociocultural influences of informal entrepreneurship, or starting a legally unregistered but otherwise legitimate business. Using the institutional logics perspective, we posit that ethnic fractionalization increases the likelihood that entrepreneurs will not register their ventures because it fosters a clan logic and embeddedness in one's ethnic group. Entrepreneurs may not readily access knowledge regarding registration because the ethnic group can provide some of the benefits associated with registration. However, the clan logic is mitigated for entrepreneurs who receive advice from lawyers or businesspeople because these advisors are associated with the state or market logics, respectively, making knowledge of registration more accessible to entrepreneurs. We find support for these arguments using a sample of over 5000 entrepreneurs in 29 countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 4","pages":"Article 106497"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143678193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106511
Theodore L. Waldron , Jeffery S. McMullen , Scott L. Newbert , G. Tyge Payne , Jeffrey G. York
Entrepreneurship research should strive for relevance—the potential to influence the thoughts, decisions, and actions of those who practice entrepreneurship. Despite the Journal of Business Venturing’s (JBV) efforts to foster relevance, submissions often fail to demonstrate their potential for practical usefulness. Addressing this problem involves making practical relevance a guiding principle of research design that complements traditional academic standards for publishing in JBV. It also involves forgoing attempts to make research directly usable by practitioners, who rarely read scholarly journals like JBV, in favor of enhancing its suitability for translation in outlets intended for those audiences. We introduce three design criteria—importance, insight, and impact—to guide the creation of translatable research that honors traditional academic standards. Our discussion touches on what the design criteria mean, how they make research translatable, how scholars can satisfy them, what they look like in exemplar JBV publications, and why they matter now. Indeed, designing research with practical importance, insight, and impact in mind may yield academic contributions more suitable for dissemination beyond academic circles, positioning entrepreneurship research to achieve practical relevance.
{"title":"Bold, broad, rigorous, and…relevant? Designing entrepreneurship research for translation","authors":"Theodore L. Waldron , Jeffery S. McMullen , Scott L. Newbert , G. Tyge Payne , Jeffrey G. York","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106511","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106511","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Entrepreneurship research should strive for relevance—the potential to influence the thoughts, decisions, and actions of those who practice entrepreneurship. Despite the Journal of Business Venturing’s (JBV) efforts to foster relevance, submissions often fail to demonstrate their potential for practical usefulness. Addressing this problem involves making practical relevance a guiding principle of research design that complements traditional academic standards for publishing in JBV. It also involves forgoing attempts to make research directly usable by practitioners, who rarely read scholarly journals like JBV, in favor of enhancing its suitability for translation in outlets intended for those audiences. We introduce three design criteria—importance, insight, and impact—to guide the creation of translatable research that honors traditional academic standards. Our discussion touches on what the design criteria mean, how they make research translatable, how scholars can satisfy them, what they look like in exemplar JBV publications, and why they matter now. Indeed, designing research with practical importance, insight, and impact in mind may yield academic contributions more suitable for dissemination beyond academic circles, positioning entrepreneurship research to achieve practical relevance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"40 4","pages":"Article 106511"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144168690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}