Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106299
Kai Becker , Joris J. Ebbers , Yuval Engel
Entrepreneurial passion is socially contagious. However, do entrepreneurs also select whom they interact with based on passion similarity? The complex interdependencies between social networks and entrepreneurial passion remain undertheorized and empirically puzzling. Using a stochastic actor-oriented model (SIENA) and four waves of panel data, we test hypotheses about the co-evolution of social networks and entrepreneurial passion during a 5-month startup accelerator program. We observe that social ties occur more frequently among peer entrepreneurs who are similar in levels of passion for founding. Initial homophily selection explains 34% of this observed similarity whereas social contagion explains 57%. Finally, we find that passion for founding is more contagious among members of startup teams than across other peer ties. Surprisingly, none of these effects are significant for passion for inventing. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
{"title":"Network to passion or passion to network? Disentangling entrepreneurial passion selection and contagion effects among peers and teams in a startup accelerator","authors":"Kai Becker , Joris J. Ebbers , Yuval Engel","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106299","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106299","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Entrepreneurial passion is socially contagious. However, do entrepreneurs also select whom they interact with based on passion similarity? The complex interdependencies between social networks and entrepreneurial passion remain undertheorized and empirically puzzling. Using a stochastic actor-oriented model (SIENA) and four waves of panel data, we test hypotheses about the co-evolution of social networks and entrepreneurial passion during a 5-month startup accelerator program. We observe that social ties occur more frequently among peer entrepreneurs who are similar in levels of passion for founding. Initial homophily selection explains 34% of this observed similarity whereas social contagion explains 57%. Finally, we find that passion for founding is more contagious among members of startup teams than across other peer ties. Surprisingly, none of these effects are significant for passion for inventing. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 106299"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48312476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106303
Pablo Muñoz , Dimo Dimov
In this paper, we address a thorny challenge: how can entrepreneurship scholarship enhance its impact without compromising the pursuit of conceptual rigor and theoretical novelty? We propose a prospective inquiry framework for entrepreneurship. It aims to align the scholarly pursuit of theoretical novelty with the entrepreneurs' focus on the future, in a shared aspiration to make a difference in the world. By expanding the focus of theoretical work toward the future, scholarship can focus on the formulation, exploration, and evaluation of alternatives to the present, as theories for desired futures. Prospective inquiry retains the primacy of theorizing while expanding its purpose, value, and use in entrepreneurship research, unleashing its generative power. It opens new spaces for theoretical excellence, dissolves the research-practice gap, and allows researchers and practitioners to theorize and enact their aspirations for the future.
{"title":"Facing the future through entrepreneurship theory: A prospective inquiry framework","authors":"Pablo Muñoz , Dimo Dimov","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106303","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106303","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we address a thorny challenge: how can entrepreneurship scholarship enhance its impact without compromising the pursuit of conceptual rigor and theoretical novelty? We propose a <em>prospective</em> inquiry framework for entrepreneurship. It aims to align the scholarly pursuit of theoretical novelty with the entrepreneurs' focus on the future, in a shared aspiration to make a difference in the world. By expanding the focus of theoretical work toward the future, scholarship can focus on the formulation, exploration, and evaluation of alternatives to the present, as theories for desired futures. Prospective inquiry retains the primacy of theorizing while expanding its purpose, value, and use in entrepreneurship research, unleashing its generative power. It opens new spaces for theoretical excellence, dissolves the research-practice gap, and allows researchers and practitioners to theorize and enact their aspirations for the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 106303"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42945275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106314
Devin Burnell , Regan Stevenson , Greg Fisher
<div><p>Recent literature suggests entrepreneurs struggle to pivot—or fundamentally change aspects of their venture—due to identity-based resistance to change. Yet, when entrepreneurs receive negative feedback, overcoming this resistance may be important to pivoting their business model. We adopt a convergent, mixed methods research design to explore when and why some entrepreneurs overcome resistance to change in response to negative feedback during early-stage business model experimentation. Building upon qualitative data that we gathered and analyzed, we theorize entrepreneurs may resist pivoting their value proposition relative to other business model components despite receiving negative feedback on this aspect of their business model. However, we find three factors – entrepreneurial experience, startup mentoring, and team size – may enable entrepreneurs to pivot in response to negative feedback. We theorize that these factors broaden a startup team's perspective, enabling value proposition pivoting during early-stage business model experimentation. We test these relationships with quantitative data from 80 startups engaged in business model experimentation and find support across hypotheses. We contribute to understanding when and why entrepreneurs pivot aspects of their business models in response to negative feedback during early-stage business model experimentation.</p></div><div><h3>Executive summary</h3><p>The entrepreneurship literature suggests startups may benefit from experimentation and pivoting different parts of their business model in response to negative feedback from stakeholders (Andries et al., 2021; Camuffo et al., 2020; Shepherd and Gruber, 2021). In early stages of starting a new venture, a business model refers to a cognitive schema or belief about an activity system that could potentially create and capture value (Massa et al., 2017; Shepherd and Gruber, 2021). Business model experimentation is the process of testing assumptions underlying this potential business model and pivoting business model assumptions in response to negative feedback (Andries et al., 2013; McDonald and Eisenhardt, 2020; Leatherbee and Katila, 2020). Building upon prior literature, we define <em>business model pivoting</em> as a fundamental change to parts of the business model (Berends et al., 2021; Snihur and Clarysse, 2022; Shepherd and Gruber, 2021). Yet, literature also suggests founders often struggle to pivot assumptions despite negative feedback. Motives to preserve and protect certain assumptions relevant to founders' identities can interfere with pivoting (Grimes, 2018; Kirtley and O'Mahony, 2023; Zuzul and Tripsas, 2020). Despite the general understanding that founders struggle to change their ideas, however, the entrepreneurship literature currently lacks precise insight into when and why founders can overcome resistance to pivoting.</p><p>In this research, we explore when and why startups pivot different parts of their business model
最近的文献表明,由于基于身份的对变革的抵制,企业家很难从根本上改变他们企业的某些方面。然而,当企业家收到负面反馈时,克服这种阻力可能对改变他们的商业模式很重要。我们采用融合、混合方法的研究设计,探索在早期商业模式实验中,一些企业家在面对负面反馈时,何时以及为什么会克服对变革的抵制。基于我们收集和分析的定性数据,我们推测,尽管在商业模式的这方面收到负面反馈,但企业家可能会拒绝将其价值主张转向其他商业模式组件。然而,我们发现三个因素——创业经验、创业指导和团队规模——可能会使企业家在应对负面反馈时转向。我们的理论是,这些因素拓宽了创业团队的视野,使价值主张在早期商业模式实验中得以转变。我们用80家从事商业模式实验的初创公司的定量数据来检验这些关系,并在假设中找到支持。我们有助于理解企业家何时以及为何在早期商业模式试验中针对负面反馈调整其商业模式的各个方面。创业文献表明,初创公司可能会从实验和调整其商业模式的不同部分中受益,以回应利益相关者的负面反馈(Andries等人,2021;Camuffo et al., 2020;Shepherd and Gruber, 2021)。在创业的早期阶段,商业模式指的是对一个活动系统的认知模式或信念,该活动系统可能创造和获取价值(Massa等人,2017;Shepherd and Gruber, 2021)。商业模式实验是测试潜在商业模式背后的假设,并根据负面反馈调整商业模式假设的过程(Andries et al., 2013;McDonald and Eisenhardt, 2020;Leatherbee and Katila, 2020)。在先前文献的基础上,我们将商业模式转向定义为对商业模式部分的根本改变(Berends等人,2021;Snihur and Clarysse, 2022;Shepherd and Gruber, 2021)。然而,文献也表明,尽管有负面反馈,创始人往往很难调整自己的假设。保留和保护与创始人身份相关的某些假设的动机可能会干扰转向(Grimes, 2018;科特利和奥马奥尼,2023;Zuzul和Tripsas, 2020)。尽管人们普遍认为创始人很难改变自己的想法,但目前的创业文献缺乏对创始人何时以及为何能够克服转向阻力的准确见解。在这项研究中,我们探讨了创业公司何时以及为何将其商业模式的不同部分作为重点。我们这样做是在早期商业模式实验的背景下进行的,在这个阶段,创始人明确地陈述对潜在商业模式的不同部分的假设,根据利益相关者的反馈来测试这些假设,并鼓励他们根据负面反馈来调整商业模式的组成部分。通过混合方法研究设计,我们发现(1)面对负面反馈,创始人倾向于拒绝将其价值主张转向商业模式的其他部分;(2)创业经验、创业指导和团队规模使创业公司能够克服这种阻力,以应对负面反馈。我们将这些因素理论化,拓宽了创始人的视角(Warshay, 1962),有助于在实验期间更大的转向意愿。我们通过解释实验过程中不同商业模式组件的微妙变化,为创业转向的文献做出了贡献。这一贡献很重要,因为它揭示了商业模式转向的阻力可能比以前想象的要复杂得多。我们还通过发现创业经验、创业指导和团队规模能够使创业公司在面对负面反馈时产生心理阻力,但仍然能够转向,从而拓宽了创始人的视野,从而为商业模式实验和创业认知之间的关系做出了贡献。这种见解在理论上很重要,因为它推动了我们对在不确定条件下进行商业模式试验的了解。这里提出的研究对实践具有明确而重要的意义。这项研究表明,在创业发展的早期阶段,创始人往往拒绝改变价值主张,而不是改变商业模式的其他组成部分。这种阻力会阻碍实验和对负面反馈的反应。
{"title":"Early-stage business model experimentation and pivoting","authors":"Devin Burnell , Regan Stevenson , Greg Fisher","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106314","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106314","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent literature suggests entrepreneurs struggle to pivot—or fundamentally change aspects of their venture—due to identity-based resistance to change. Yet, when entrepreneurs receive negative feedback, overcoming this resistance may be important to pivoting their business model. We adopt a convergent, mixed methods research design to explore when and why some entrepreneurs overcome resistance to change in response to negative feedback during early-stage business model experimentation. Building upon qualitative data that we gathered and analyzed, we theorize entrepreneurs may resist pivoting their value proposition relative to other business model components despite receiving negative feedback on this aspect of their business model. However, we find three factors – entrepreneurial experience, startup mentoring, and team size – may enable entrepreneurs to pivot in response to negative feedback. We theorize that these factors broaden a startup team's perspective, enabling value proposition pivoting during early-stage business model experimentation. We test these relationships with quantitative data from 80 startups engaged in business model experimentation and find support across hypotheses. We contribute to understanding when and why entrepreneurs pivot aspects of their business models in response to negative feedback during early-stage business model experimentation.</p></div><div><h3>Executive summary</h3><p>The entrepreneurship literature suggests startups may benefit from experimentation and pivoting different parts of their business model in response to negative feedback from stakeholders (Andries et al., 2021; Camuffo et al., 2020; Shepherd and Gruber, 2021). In early stages of starting a new venture, a business model refers to a cognitive schema or belief about an activity system that could potentially create and capture value (Massa et al., 2017; Shepherd and Gruber, 2021). Business model experimentation is the process of testing assumptions underlying this potential business model and pivoting business model assumptions in response to negative feedback (Andries et al., 2013; McDonald and Eisenhardt, 2020; Leatherbee and Katila, 2020). Building upon prior literature, we define <em>business model pivoting</em> as a fundamental change to parts of the business model (Berends et al., 2021; Snihur and Clarysse, 2022; Shepherd and Gruber, 2021). Yet, literature also suggests founders often struggle to pivot assumptions despite negative feedback. Motives to preserve and protect certain assumptions relevant to founders' identities can interfere with pivoting (Grimes, 2018; Kirtley and O'Mahony, 2023; Zuzul and Tripsas, 2020). Despite the general understanding that founders struggle to change their ideas, however, the entrepreneurship literature currently lacks precise insight into when and why founders can overcome resistance to pivoting.</p><p>In this research, we explore when and why startups pivot different parts of their business model","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 106314"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41534087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106302
Itziar Castelló , David Barberá-Tomás , Eero Vaara
Despite increasing interest in the narratives of entrepreneurial failure, the understanding of how entrepreneurs reconstruct their identity as they advance from experiences of failure to new ventures remains partial. Based on a narrative analysis of 49 entrepreneurs' experiences, we uncover three narrative types used by entrepreneurs when moving on: shielding, transformation, and authenticity. In particular, we elaborate on how the entrepreneurs employ specific discursive practices in their narratives to deal with three central aspects of identity reconstruction: construction of responsibility, identity transition, and identity validation. Thus, our analysis elucidates the narrative underpinnings of dealing with failure and deepens our understanding of entrepreneurial identity construction in the context of moving on.
{"title":"Moving on: Narrative identity reconstruction after entrepreneurial failure","authors":"Itziar Castelló , David Barberá-Tomás , Eero Vaara","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106302","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106302","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite increasing interest in the narratives of entrepreneurial failure, the understanding of how entrepreneurs reconstruct their identity as they advance from experiences of failure to new ventures remains partial. Based on a narrative analysis of 49 entrepreneurs' experiences, we uncover three narrative types used by entrepreneurs when moving on: shielding, transformation, and authenticity. In particular, we elaborate on how the entrepreneurs employ specific discursive practices in their narratives to deal with three central aspects of identity reconstruction: construction of responsibility, identity transition, and identity validation. Thus, our analysis elucidates the narrative underpinnings of dealing with failure and deepens our understanding of entrepreneurial identity construction in the context of moving on.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 106302"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49283853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106313
Panagiotis Sotirakopoulos , Matthew P. Mount , Cahit Guven , Aydogan Ulker , Carol Graham
Studies argue that macroeconomic contractions create immediate incentives for individuals to pursue entrepreneurship. However, research has not addressed whether past macroeconomic contractions imprint on individuals and influence their future entrepreneurship. Integrating literature on the business cycle and imprinting with insights from lifespan psychology, we develop and test competing theoretical arguments aligned to two distinct life stages about when a macroeconomic contraction will imprint on individuals to influence their future entrepreneurship, and how such effects are imprinted. Our findings show that only contractions experienced during early adulthood influence entrepreneurship and this effect is transmitted culturally via country-level preferences for time discounting.
{"title":"A tale of two life stages: The imprinting effect of macroeconomic contractions on later life entrepreneurship","authors":"Panagiotis Sotirakopoulos , Matthew P. Mount , Cahit Guven , Aydogan Ulker , Carol Graham","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106313","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106313","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Studies argue that macroeconomic contractions create immediate incentives for individuals to pursue entrepreneurship. However, research has not addressed whether past macroeconomic contractions <em>imprint</em> on individuals and influence their future entrepreneurship. Integrating literature on the business cycle and imprinting with insights from lifespan psychology, we develop and test competing theoretical arguments aligned to two distinct life stages about <em>when</em> a macroeconomic contraction will imprint on individuals to influence their future entrepreneurship, and <em>how</em> such effects are imprinted. Our findings show that only contractions experienced during early adulthood influence entrepreneurship and this effect is transmitted culturally via country-level preferences for time discounting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 106313"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45492476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106312
Blake D. Mathias, Stephanie Wang
When launching their ventures, the majority of entrepreneurs are married. Yet, our understanding of the spousal influence on the entrepreneurial process remains limited. This is surprising considering the spouse represents one of the most influential figures in an individual's life. Through an inductive qualitative analysis of 18 spouse-entrepreneur pairs, we explore the interactive nature of venture-related roles between the spousal couple and how these spousal roles evolve over the course of the venture. Our study shows that the dynamic alignment between entrepreneurial roles and spousal roles allows the venture to progress through various stages of firm innovation, creation, and growth. Thus, our paper extends the broader literature on roles during the venturing process as we illuminate the “not-so-silent role” of spouses in entrepreneurship.
{"title":"Not so silent partners: Exploring the interconnected roles of entrepreneurs and their spouses","authors":"Blake D. Mathias, Stephanie Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106312","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106312","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When launching their ventures, the majority of entrepreneurs are married. Yet, our understanding of the spousal influence on the entrepreneurial process remains limited. This is surprising considering the spouse represents one of the most influential figures in an individual's life. Through an inductive qualitative analysis of 18 spouse-entrepreneur pairs, we explore the interactive nature of venture-related roles between the spousal couple and how these spousal roles evolve over the course of the venture. Our study shows that the dynamic alignment between entrepreneurial roles and spousal roles allows the venture to progress through various stages of firm innovation, creation, and growth. Thus, our paper extends the broader literature on roles during the venturing process as we illuminate the “not-so-silent role” of spouses in entrepreneurship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 106312"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48422123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
One of the major entrepreneurial challenges faced by scaling firms involves changing their internal organization. Our study focuses on a particular aspect of internal organizing—namely, how founder roles evolve in preparation for scaling. By means of an in-depth case study and a combination of data collection methods, we study the evolution of formal and informal founder roles. For both types of roles, we identify a founder-driven and an interaction-driven phase, during which founder and/or joiner role-crafting take place. Through both types of role-crafting, founder roles are (re)shaped. Particularly unique to our study is that we identify three scaling-specific paths through which the role-crafting of joiners shapes founders' roles. Specifically, founders experience a role efficiency increase as they take over some of the joiner-introduced role behaviors, or a role set decrease as joiners take over some of their (formal or informal) roles. We further point to the importance of psychological safety and value fit for successful joiner role-crafting to occur and for founder roles to change following founder-joiner interactions. Our study adds to the literatures on scaling and entrepreneurship as well as to role theory and role-crafting literature.
{"title":"Preparing for scaling: A study on founder role evolution","authors":"Evy Van Lancker , Mirjam Knockaert , Veroniek Collewaert , Nicola Breugst","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106315","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106315","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the major entrepreneurial challenges faced by scaling firms involves changing their internal organization. Our study focuses on a particular aspect of internal organizing—namely, how founder roles evolve in preparation for scaling. By means of an in-depth case study and a combination of data collection methods, we study the evolution of formal and informal founder roles. For both types of roles, we identify a founder-driven and an interaction-driven phase, during which founder and/or joiner role-crafting take place. Through both types of role-crafting, founder roles are (re)shaped. Particularly unique to our study is that we identify three scaling-specific paths through which the role-crafting of joiners shapes founders' roles. Specifically, founders experience a role efficiency increase as they take over some of the joiner-introduced role behaviors, or a role set decrease as joiners take over some of their (formal or informal) roles. We further point to the importance of psychological safety and value fit for successful joiner role-crafting to occur and for founder roles to change following founder-joiner interactions. Our study adds to the literatures on scaling and entrepreneurship as well as to role theory and role-crafting literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 106315"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42347967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106317
Brett R. Smith , Amanda Lawson , Saulo Dubard Barbosa , Jessica Jones
While an economic paradigm has been productive for entrepreneurship, religion has been proposed as an alternative rationality to advance research in our field. To extend a theological turn in entrepreneurship and identity research, our study inductively develops a conceptual model that explains how individuals navigate entrepreneurial identity threats based on the interaction between a relational identity with God (RIG) and an entrepreneurial identity to persist in entrepreneurial action. Our study suggests this can happen when entrepreneurs engage in inter-identity work mechanisms - affirming and humbling - to mitigate these identity threats. Specifically, a relational identity with God acts as a countervailing force to an entrepreneurial identity during times of identity threats to generate inter-identity meaning change, resulting in interidentity stability and entrepreneurial persistence. Through our study, we advance knowledge on the theological turn in entrepreneurship and identity by inductively developing theory on a new religious identity construct (RIG), elaborating theory of inter-identity work by shifting the focus from structural to content changes, and extending theory on entrepreneurial action, persistence, and well-being based on theological rather than economic considerations.
{"title":"Navigating the highs and lows of entrepreneurial identity threats to persist: The countervailing force of a relational identity with God","authors":"Brett R. Smith , Amanda Lawson , Saulo Dubard Barbosa , Jessica Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106317","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106317","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While an economic paradigm has been productive for entrepreneurship, religion has been proposed as an alternative rationality to advance research in our field. To extend a theological turn in entrepreneurship and identity research, our study inductively develops a conceptual model that explains how individuals navigate entrepreneurial identity threats based on the interaction between a relational identity with God (RIG) and an entrepreneurial identity to persist in entrepreneurial action. Our study suggests this can happen when entrepreneurs engage in inter-identity work mechanisms - affirming and humbling - to mitigate these identity threats. Specifically, a relational identity with God acts as a countervailing force to an entrepreneurial identity during times of identity threats to generate inter-identity meaning change, resulting in interidentity stability and entrepreneurial persistence. Through our study, we advance knowledge on the theological turn in entrepreneurship and identity by inductively developing theory on a new religious identity construct (RIG), elaborating theory of inter-identity work by shifting the focus from structural to content changes, and extending theory on entrepreneurial action, persistence, and well-being based on theological rather than economic considerations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 106317"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47255711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106301
Jeffrey M. Pollack , Melissa S. Cardon , Matthew W. Rutherford , Enrica N. Ruggs , Lakshmi Balachandra , Robert A. Baron
In this special issue, we aim to explore the topic of rationality and its manifestations in entrepreneurship. The six articles in this special issue cover a range of questions about rationality – what it is, where it comes from, how it influences decision-making as well as understanding contextual factors that influence it. Reflecting our call for submissions as well as the accepted articles included in this special issue, we recognize, but also depart from, rationality's origins in economics to provide a range of perspectives on rationality in the entrepreneurship process. We also discuss common themes and future research directions for the field.
{"title":"Rationality in the entrepreneurship process: Is being rational actually rational? Introduction to the special issue","authors":"Jeffrey M. Pollack , Melissa S. Cardon , Matthew W. Rutherford , Enrica N. Ruggs , Lakshmi Balachandra , Robert A. Baron","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106301","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106301","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this special issue, we aim to explore the topic of rationality and its manifestations in entrepreneurship. The six articles in this special issue cover a range of questions about rationality – what it is, where it comes from, how it influences decision-making as well as understanding contextual factors that influence it. Reflecting our call for submissions as well as the accepted articles included in this special issue, we recognize, but also depart from, rationality's origins in economics to provide a range of perspectives on rationality in the entrepreneurship process. We also discuss common themes and future research directions for the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 106301"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44766990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106300
Yuliya Shymko , Theodore A. Khoury
We study the development of entrepreneurial motivation of participants in an Ecuadorian incubator. Using a narrative inquiry approach based on 41 interviews, we uncover how different modes of rootedness in distinct communities shape entrepreneurial dispositions and shed light on the role of a temporary community of practice in intermediating the development and ultimate transformation of these dispositions into individuated motivations. By bringing to the frontline the role of communities in shaping the formation process of entrepreneurial motivation, we offer a new theoretical angle for understanding intricate relations between social embeddedness, temporary communities of practice, and entrepreneurial pursuits in non-Western contexts.
{"title":"From community rootedness to individuated entrepreneuring: The development of entrepreneurial motivation through a temporary community of practice","authors":"Yuliya Shymko , Theodore A. Khoury","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106300","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106300","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study the development of entrepreneurial motivation of participants in an Ecuadorian incubator. Using a narrative inquiry approach based on 41 interviews, we uncover how different modes of rootedness in distinct communities shape entrepreneurial dispositions and shed light on the role of a temporary community of practice in intermediating the development and ultimate transformation of these dispositions into individuated motivations. By bringing to the frontline the role of communities in shaping the formation process of entrepreneurial motivation, we offer a new theoretical angle for understanding intricate relations between social embeddedness, temporary communities of practice, and entrepreneurial pursuits in non-Western contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 106300"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47381632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}