Pub Date : 2025-07-28DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102499
Konstantinos Bozos , Igor Filatotchev , Marc Goergen
We bring together insights from international business (IB), finance, economics, and accounting to offer a multi-faceted perspective on firm strategies and global governance. Complex, multi-level institutional environments—particularly in emerging markets—necessitate cross-fertilisation between IB and other disciplines. Research on the role of foreign investors in both corporate financing and internationalisation is associated with persistent gaps and research opportunities, especially in understanding how state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds navigate regulatory and governance challenges. Evolving management accounting practices require that traditional frameworks be adapted to better accommodate multi-national contexts. Further, the latest developments in research on capital structure and financial constraints suggest that they act as both barriers and enablers for international expansion. Finally, contemporary challenges, such as populism, climate risk, and digital disruption, underscore the pressing need for interdisciplinary research with purpose and broad scope. We recommend an integrated research agenda that reconciles these diverse elements to advance both theory and practice in global business.
{"title":"Corporate governance, finance, and global strategy","authors":"Konstantinos Bozos , Igor Filatotchev , Marc Goergen","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102499","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102499","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We bring together insights from international business (IB), finance, economics, and accounting to offer a multi-faceted perspective on firm strategies and global governance. Complex, multi-level institutional environments—particularly in emerging markets—necessitate cross-fertilisation between IB and other disciplines. Research on the role of foreign investors in both corporate financing and internationalisation is associated with persistent gaps and research opportunities, especially in understanding how state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds navigate regulatory and governance challenges. Evolving management accounting practices require that traditional frameworks be adapted to better accommodate multi-national contexts. Further, the latest developments in research on capital structure and financial constraints suggest that they act as both barriers and enablers for international expansion. Finally, contemporary challenges, such as populism, climate risk, and digital disruption, underscore the pressing need for interdisciplinary research with purpose and broad scope. We recommend an integrated research agenda that reconciles these diverse elements to advance both theory and practice in global business.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 102499"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145026655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-21DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102488
Yama Temouri , Geoffrey Wood , Vijay Pereira , Krista B. Lewellyn , Dimitrios Reppas
This paper provides an exploratory analysis of international e-commerce activity using cross-country data for SMEs from around the world. We explore how legal origin, institutional development, infrastructure, and policy variation affect SME e-commerce activity, challenging common assumptions about which institutional combinations best support innovative areas of economic activity. Our analysis uses fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and draws on contextual metrics and data from the Future of Business Survey - a collaboration between Facebook, the OECD, and the World Bank. Counter-intuitively, our findings show that high-intensity e-commerce SME exporters in emerging markets report greater satisfaction with domestic policies than their counterparts in developed countries with more mature institutional frameworks. Moreover, SMEs from common law systems do not seem to enjoy inherent advantages, despite assumption that these countries can better foster successful outward-oriented entrepreneurship. We explore potential explanations for these unexpected results. Finally, although light regulation is often promoted as key to business growth, our findings suggest that SMEs with high export intensity value consistency and coherence in policy and regulation. We draw implications from our study for both theory and policy.
{"title":"Cross-country evidence of e-commerce SME internationalization and the role of policy","authors":"Yama Temouri , Geoffrey Wood , Vijay Pereira , Krista B. Lewellyn , Dimitrios Reppas","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102488","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102488","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper provides an exploratory analysis of international e-commerce activity using cross-country data for SMEs from around the world. We explore how legal origin, institutional development, infrastructure, and policy variation affect SME e-commerce activity, challenging common assumptions about which institutional combinations best support innovative areas of economic activity. Our analysis uses fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and draws on contextual metrics and data from the Future of Business Survey - a collaboration between Facebook, the OECD, and the World Bank. Counter-intuitively, our findings show that high-intensity e-commerce SME exporters in emerging markets report greater satisfaction with domestic policies than their counterparts in developed countries with more mature institutional frameworks. Moreover, SMEs from common law systems do not seem to enjoy inherent advantages, despite assumption that these countries can better foster successful outward-oriented entrepreneurship. We explore potential explanations for these unexpected results. Finally, although light regulation is often promoted as key to business growth, our findings suggest that SMEs with high export intensity value consistency and coherence in policy and regulation. We draw implications from our study for both theory and policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 102488"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145026662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-14DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102485
Rian Drogendijk , Hammad ul Haq , Desirée Blankenburg Holm
Weight, voice, and distance are proposed in the literature as determinants of positive attention from MNC headquarters for subsidiaries. Few studies have, however, investigated how combinations of these three causal conditions may jointly impact positive attention. Based on the existing literature, we hypothesize how different combinations result in subsidiaries’ gaining headquarters attention. We test our hypotheses using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) leading to the surprising result that any combination of conditions including subsidiary weight leads to attention as outcome, including weight alone. We further substantiate this result through regression analysis using survey data. Together, our empirical studies show that weight alone is related to headquarters’ positive attention, while voice and distance do not play a decisive role in influencing headquarters’ positive attention for subsidiaries abroad. These findings challenge existing research claiming voice as a means to gain headquarters’ attention, especially for distant or peripheral subsidiaries.
{"title":"Configurations of weight, voice and distance and headquarters positive attention: Weight matters most","authors":"Rian Drogendijk , Hammad ul Haq , Desirée Blankenburg Holm","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102485","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102485","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Weight, voice, and distance are proposed in the literature as determinants of positive attention from MNC headquarters for subsidiaries. Few studies have, however, investigated how combinations of these three causal conditions may jointly impact positive attention. Based on the existing literature, we hypothesize how different combinations result in subsidiaries’ gaining headquarters attention. We test our hypotheses using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) leading to the surprising result that any combination of conditions including subsidiary weight leads to attention as outcome, including weight alone. We further substantiate this result through regression analysis using survey data. Together, our empirical studies show that weight alone is related to headquarters’ positive attention, while voice and distance do not play a decisive role in influencing headquarters’ positive attention for subsidiaries abroad. These findings challenge existing research claiming voice as a means to gain headquarters’ attention, especially for distant or peripheral subsidiaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102485"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144694406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-14DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102483
Zhigang Zuo , Wenquan Zheng , Chengqi Wang , Jiaoyue Su , Malay N. Desai
While international business (IB) literature highlights the impact of religious distance on cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBMAs), limited research has examined how host-country religiosity, defined as the popularity and devoutness of religious beliefs, affects the completion of inward CBMA deals. Using a propensity score matching (PSM) approach and analyzing 4290 CBMA transactions across 105 host countries from 1999 to 2019, we find that higher levels of host-country religiosity reduce the likelihood of CBMA deal completion, independent of religious distance. We further identify increased distrust toward foreign acquirers as a key mediating mechanism. However, a stage-by-stage acquisition strategy, rather than a one-off, full-control approach, mitigates the negative impact of religiosity on deal completion. Our findings contribute to CBMA research by positioning host-country religiosity as a critical determinant of deal outcomes, revealing social trust as a mediating factor, and highlighting the moderating role of acquisition structuring.
{"title":"Unveiling the influence of host-country religiosity on the completion of cross-border merger and acquisition deals","authors":"Zhigang Zuo , Wenquan Zheng , Chengqi Wang , Jiaoyue Su , Malay N. Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102483","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102483","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While international business (IB) literature highlights the impact of religious distance on cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBMAs), limited research has examined how host-country religiosity, defined as the popularity and devoutness of religious beliefs, affects the completion of inward CBMA deals. Using a propensity score matching (PSM) approach and analyzing 4290 CBMA transactions across 105 host countries from 1999 to 2019, we find that higher levels of host-country religiosity reduce the likelihood of CBMA deal completion, independent of religious distance. We further identify increased distrust toward foreign acquirers as a key mediating mechanism. However, a stage-by-stage acquisition strategy, rather than a one-off, full-control approach, mitigates the negative impact of religiosity on deal completion. Our findings contribute to CBMA research by positioning host-country religiosity as a critical determinant of deal outcomes, revealing social trust as a mediating factor, and highlighting the moderating role of acquisition structuring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102483"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144694444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487
Keith D. Brouthers , Christine Ascencio , Mamoun Benmamoun , Hadi Alhorr
Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.
{"title":"Digital standardization vs. adaptation: Mitigating the liability of outsidership – A literature review","authors":"Keith D. Brouthers , Christine Ascencio , Mamoun Benmamoun , Hadi Alhorr","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102487","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditionally, firms expanding internationally must decide on when to modify their business model by either standardizing or adapting their products, price, promotion, and distribution activities to overcome the liability of foreignness (LOF). However, firms that pursue internationalization through internet-based digital ventures—such as websites, mobile applications, social media, and online platforms—encounter distinct entry barriers that give rise to a liability of outsidership (LOO). We contribute to this literature by proposing a conceptual framework and theoretical perspective that explains how the degree of business model standardization or adaptation can influence the extent to which firms can reduce both LOF and LOO in digital internationalization. We then conduct a systematic literature review of existing research on digital standardization and adaptation, highlighting current findings and identifying key gaps in the field. Our review of 49 relevant studies reveals that much of the existing research is fragmented, often lacks a unifying theoretical foundation, and primarily focuses on website and promotional adaptation, largely neglecting other critical business model components and the broader set of digital-specific entry barriers. Drawing on our theory and literature review we develop recommendations to guide future research and advance our understanding of this important issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102487"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144694440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-10DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102484
Sihong Wu , Di Fan , Yiyi Su
Due to the growing complexity of international relations over the past decade, multinational enterprises (MNEs) have embarked on a new era characterized by novel challenges and opportunities. The reversal trend of internationalization has evoked a fast-growing research interest in MNEs’ foreign divestment decisions. However, scant research has integrated the changing international relations in order to examine their propensity to divest. Drawing on insights from the international relations perspective, this study explores the impact of host-country national sentiment (characterized by the prioritization of national interests) and home-host country diplomatic relations (centered on fostering bilateral interests) on foreign divestment. Our findings show that MNEs’ propensity to divest increases when host-country national sentiment becomes stronger but decreases when home-host countries have strengthened diplomatic engagement. These relationships are moderated by MNEs’ ownership strategy. Overall, this study enriches the literature and offers new insights into de-globalization and the research of unilateral and bilateral relations in international business.
{"title":"International relations and foreign divestment of multinational enterprises","authors":"Sihong Wu , Di Fan , Yiyi Su","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102484","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102484","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the growing complexity of international relations over the past decade, multinational enterprises (MNEs) have embarked on a new era characterized by novel challenges and opportunities. The reversal trend of internationalization has evoked a fast-growing research interest in MNEs’ foreign divestment decisions. However, scant research has integrated the changing international relations in order to examine their propensity to divest. Drawing on insights from the international relations perspective, this study explores the impact of host-country national sentiment (characterized by the prioritization of national interests) and home-host country diplomatic relations (centered on fostering bilateral interests) on foreign divestment. Our findings show that MNEs’ propensity to divest increases when host-country national sentiment becomes stronger but decreases when home-host countries have strengthened diplomatic engagement. These relationships are moderated by MNEs’ ownership strategy. Overall, this study enriches the literature and offers new insights into de-globalization and the research of unilateral and bilateral relations in international business.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102484"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144694438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-09DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102482
Avaz Mammadov , Andreas Wald
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) internationalize to pursue growth opportunities, diversify revenue sources, and enhance competitiveness. Choosing an appropriate foreign market entry mode (non-equity modes such as direct exports, or equity-based modes such as acquisitions) is crucial, as it affects resource allocation, control, and risk in new markets. However, existing literature on entry modes focuses on large firms, limiting the understanding of how SME owner-managers’ individual competencies influence these decisions. Drawing on upper echelons theory, this study examines how individual-level competencies shape SMEs’ foreign market entry mode choices. Specifically, it highlights how leadership self-efficacy (LSE) drives SME owner-managers toward equity-based entry modes, while cultural intelligence (CQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ) strengthen this relationship by equipping leaders to navigate cultural and emotional complexities in international markets. Data were collected from 399 SME owner-managers in Norway and Azerbaijan and analyzed using binary logistic regression. The results confirm that high LSE is positively associated with equity-based entry modes, with CQ and EQ amplifying this effect. This study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it introduces LSE as a novel factor in SME foreign market entry. Second, it extends the understanding of CQ and EQ as critical amplifiers in SMEs’ entry mode decisions. Finally, by applying upper echelons theory to SMEs, the study addresses a gap in the literature, demonstrating how individual-level competencies uniquely shape SMEs’ strategic choices in foreign market entry.
{"title":"The role of SME owner-managers’ leadership self-efficacy, cultural intelligence and emotional intelligence in foreign market entry mode","authors":"Avaz Mammadov , Andreas Wald","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102482","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102482","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) internationalize to pursue growth opportunities, diversify revenue sources, and enhance competitiveness. Choosing an appropriate foreign market entry mode (non-equity modes such as direct exports, or equity-based modes such as acquisitions) is crucial, as it affects resource allocation, control, and risk in new markets. However, existing literature on entry modes focuses on large firms, limiting the understanding of how SME owner-managers’ individual competencies influence these decisions. Drawing on upper echelons theory, this study examines how individual-level competencies shape SMEs’ foreign market entry mode choices. Specifically, it highlights how leadership self-efficacy (LSE) drives SME owner-managers toward equity-based entry modes, while cultural intelligence (CQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ) strengthen this relationship by equipping leaders to navigate cultural and emotional complexities in international markets. Data were collected from 399 SME owner-managers in Norway and Azerbaijan and analyzed using binary logistic regression. The results confirm that high LSE is positively associated with equity-based entry modes, with CQ and EQ amplifying this effect. This study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it introduces LSE as a novel factor in SME foreign market entry. Second, it extends the understanding of CQ and EQ as critical amplifiers in SMEs’ entry mode decisions. Finally, by applying upper echelons theory to SMEs, the study addresses a gap in the literature, demonstrating how individual-level competencies uniquely shape SMEs’ strategic choices in foreign market entry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102482"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144694443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-09DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102486
Ranjan DasGupta , Soumya Guha Deb
This study examines the relationship between national culture, defined by Hofstede's cultural dimensions, and corporate controversies across countries, while assessing the influence of firm-level corporate governance on moderating this connection. It finds more likelihood of controversies in cultures characterized by individualism, femininity, high power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, short-term orientation, and indulgence. Notably, certain CG mechanisms—especially board independence and a higher presence of female directors—can help reduce firms’ involvement in controversies, though their moderating effects vary across different cultural contexts. Furthermore, enhancing our baseline analysis, we categorize corporate controversies, analyse the influence of cultural traits on each category, and highlight specific cultural combinations associated with a decreased risk of controversies. Our findings underscore the complex interplay of cultural influences and governance structures in the ethical operations of cross-country firms.
{"title":"Cultural dimensions and corporate controversies: The moderating role of corporate governance","authors":"Ranjan DasGupta , Soumya Guha Deb","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102486","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102486","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the relationship between national culture, defined by Hofstede's cultural dimensions, and corporate controversies across countries, while assessing the influence of firm-level corporate governance on moderating this connection. It finds more likelihood of controversies in cultures characterized by individualism, femininity, high power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, short-term orientation, and indulgence. Notably, certain CG mechanisms—especially board independence and a higher presence of female directors—can help reduce firms’ involvement in controversies, though their moderating effects vary across different cultural contexts. Furthermore, enhancing our baseline analysis, we categorize corporate controversies, analyse the influence of cultural traits on each category, and highlight specific cultural combinations associated with a decreased risk of controversies. Our findings underscore the complex interplay of cultural influences and governance structures in the ethical operations of cross-country firms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102486"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144694407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-27DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102481
Yeongsu Anthony Kim , María del Carmen Triana
This study examines the role of women directors in shaping strategic decisions within corporate boards, with a particular emphasis on internationalization strategies such as greenfield investments among S&P 500 firms. While existing research highlights the benefits of women’s board representation for firm performance, it often overlooks their contributions to critical decision-making areas. We argue that female directors enhance their influence on board decisions by promoting diversity practices, which enable firms to leverage their unique perspectives more effectively. Furthermore, we posit that advocacy for diversity decreases as women’s board representation reaches a critical mass. Lastly, we link diversity practices to enhanced firm adaptability in complex business environments. By investigating the mediating mechanisms through which gender-diverse boards influence international strategies, our research addresses gaps in the literature on board diversity, entry modes, and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This study offers insights into how women’s representation on boards translates into actionable influence, fostering improved strategic decision-making and organizational performance.
{"title":"Women’s representation on boards, diversity practices, and internationalization: Evidence from greenfield investment","authors":"Yeongsu Anthony Kim , María del Carmen Triana","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102481","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102481","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the role of women directors in shaping strategic decisions within corporate boards, with a particular emphasis on internationalization strategies such as greenfield investments among S&P 500 firms. While existing research highlights the benefits of women’s board representation for firm performance, it often overlooks their contributions to critical decision-making areas. We argue that female directors enhance their influence on board decisions by promoting diversity practices, which enable firms to leverage their unique perspectives more effectively. Furthermore, we posit that advocacy for diversity decreases as women’s board representation reaches a critical mass. Lastly, we link diversity practices to enhanced firm adaptability in complex business environments. By investigating the mediating mechanisms through which gender-diverse boards influence international strategies, our research addresses gaps in the literature on board diversity, entry modes, and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This study offers insights into how women’s representation on boards translates into actionable influence, fostering improved strategic decision-making and organizational performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102481"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144694442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102480
Taewoo Roh , Shufeng Xiao , Pervez N. Ghauri , Byung Il Park , Soo Jung Oh
The contributions of market-seeking and strategic resource-seeking motives to firms’ internationalization have been widely recognized. However, previous studies have paid scant attention to how firms’ strategic behavior regarding capacity-based searches can differ in certain contexts. Thus, little is known about the effect of the relationship between ownership and capacity-based searches on venture firms’ internationalization. Drawing on the behavioral theory of the firm, we identify the relationship between innovation performance feedback and the internationalization of specific venture firm types (i.e., emerging challengers) that are motivated to adopt both slack search and problemistic search. We then further explore the moderating effect of two ownership types (i.e., internal principal and international outsidership) on this relationship. Using a sample of 300 venture firms, our results show that innovation performance feedback is vital in encouraging firms’ internationalization. This relationship is further strengthened by firms’ internal and external ownership competence. The results are verified using a qualitative method, providing triangulation of findings.
{"title":"Venture firms’ internationalization: The case of emerging challengers","authors":"Taewoo Roh , Shufeng Xiao , Pervez N. Ghauri , Byung Il Park , Soo Jung Oh","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102480","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102480","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The contributions of market-seeking and strategic resource-seeking motives to firms’ internationalization have been widely recognized. However, previous studies have paid scant attention to how firms’ strategic behavior regarding capacity-based searches can differ in certain contexts. Thus, little is known about the effect of the relationship between ownership and capacity-based searches on venture firms’ internationalization. Drawing on the behavioral theory of the firm, we identify the relationship between innovation performance feedback and the internationalization of specific venture firm types (i.e., emerging challengers) that are motivated to adopt both slack search and problemistic search. We then further explore the moderating effect of two ownership types (i.e., internal principal and international outsidership) on this relationship. Using a sample of 300 venture firms, our results show that innovation performance feedback is vital in encouraging firms’ internationalization. This relationship is further strengthened by firms’ internal and external ownership competence. The results are verified using a qualitative method, providing triangulation of findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 5","pages":"Article 102480"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144694441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}