China's higher education system has been reshaped by economic globalisation, national development priorities and growing international competition. Guided by Knight's framework of internationalisation and policy transfer theory, this paper employs a systematic literature review to examine the historical evolution, major policies and global implications of internationalisation and transnational higher education (TNHE) in China. The findings highlight a persistent balance between openness to global practices and the safeguarding of sovereignty, security and economic development. Early reforms relied on importing foreign models, while contemporary strategies emphasise selective adaptation and hybridisation, producing a distinctive model of ‘China-led internationalisation’. This model integrates global perspectives into domestic frameworks while extending China's academic and cultural influence internationally. The study contributes to international higher education research by showing that policy transfer in China is not passive imitation but an active process of negotiation and innovation, positioning China as both a recipient and a global influencer.
{"title":"Higher Education Evolution in China: A Systematic Review of the Internationalisation of Higher Education in China","authors":"Huili Si","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70088","url":null,"abstract":"<p>China's higher education system has been reshaped by economic globalisation, national development priorities and growing international competition. Guided by Knight's framework of internationalisation and policy transfer theory, this paper employs a systematic literature review to examine the historical evolution, major policies and global implications of internationalisation and transnational higher education (TNHE) in China. The findings highlight a persistent balance between openness to global practices and the safeguarding of sovereignty, security and economic development. Early reforms relied on importing foreign models, while contemporary strategies emphasise selective adaptation and hybridisation, producing a distinctive model of ‘China-led internationalisation’. This model integrates global perspectives into domestic frameworks while extending China's academic and cultural influence internationally. The study contributes to international higher education research by showing that policy transfer in China is not passive imitation but an active process of negotiation and innovation, positioning China as both a recipient and a global influencer.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70088","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145580685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Isak Frumin, Anton Vorochkov, Margarita Kiryushina, Daria Platonova, Evgeniy Terentiev
This study analyses over 4000 publications, including those from 2024, indexed in the Scopus database, aiming to describe the landscape of the growing body of research exploring the role of generative AI in higher education. We followed an inclusive approach to publication formats and languages, incorporating not only traditional peer-reviewed articles but also conference proceedings and preprints. Our analysis focuses on two key dimensions—general characteristics of publications, including publication types, journals, subject areas, countries, languages, and collaboration patterns—and content analysis, covering topics, methodologies, and sentiment. Among the main findings, we identify that the majority of studies focus on individual-level analysis, with a lack of comparative institutional- and national-level perspectives. Clear regional clusters of AI research have emerged, but a significant gap remains in the form of comparative studies. Topic-wise, there is a visible shift from the technical capabilities of AI systems to their practical implementation, ethical concerns, and integration into educational frameworks. Finally, although the field anticipates the use of advanced research methods, most studies still rely on isolated case studies, surveys and simple experimental designs.
{"title":"Mapping the Generative AI Research in Higher Education: 2022–2024 Insights","authors":"Isak Frumin, Anton Vorochkov, Margarita Kiryushina, Daria Platonova, Evgeniy Terentiev","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study analyses over 4000 publications, including those from 2024, indexed in the Scopus database, aiming to describe the landscape of the growing body of research exploring the role of generative AI in higher education. We followed an inclusive approach to publication formats and languages, incorporating not only traditional peer-reviewed articles but also conference proceedings and preprints. Our analysis focuses on two key dimensions—general characteristics of publications, including publication types, journals, subject areas, countries, languages, and collaboration patterns—and content analysis, covering topics, methodologies, and sentiment. Among the main findings, we identify that the majority of studies focus on individual-level analysis, with a lack of comparative institutional- and national-level perspectives. Clear regional clusters of AI research have emerged, but a significant gap remains in the form of comparative studies. Topic-wise, there is a visible shift from the technical capabilities of AI systems to their practical implementation, ethical concerns, and integration into educational frameworks. Finally, although the field anticipates the use of advanced research methods, most studies still rely on isolated case studies, surveys and simple experimental designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70075","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145529745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Trinidad Mentado-Labao, Núria Serrat-Antolí, David Rodríguez-Gómez, Diego Castro-Ceacero
In organisations characterised by generational diversity, information and knowledge exchange present both challenges and opportunities. Managing intergenerational relationships among teaching staff at higher education institutions necessitates, among other efforts, a critical review of communication processes. However, few studies have explored the implications of generational diversity for organisational communication, particularly in university settings. This study aimed to examine intergenerational communication in the workplace among teaching staff at Spanish public universities. The Workplace Intergenerational Climate Scale questionnaire was administered to 1,751 Spanish academics. The findings reveal that teaching staff exhibit certain age-related stereotypes that influence communication. When intergenerational communication is perceived as effective, it tends to focus predominantly on academic tasks. Age-related differences and associated beliefs significantly influence the quality, quantity and nature of intergenerational interactions. Additionally, other variables such as gender, institutional size and the intensification of managerial responsibilities play important roles.
{"title":"Intergenerational Communication in the Workplace Among Teaching Staff at Universities","authors":"Trinidad Mentado-Labao, Núria Serrat-Antolí, David Rodríguez-Gómez, Diego Castro-Ceacero","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70078","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In organisations characterised by generational diversity, information and knowledge exchange present both challenges and opportunities. Managing intergenerational relationships among teaching staff at higher education institutions necessitates, among other efforts, a critical review of communication processes. However, few studies have explored the implications of generational diversity for organisational communication, particularly in university settings. This study aimed to examine intergenerational communication in the workplace among teaching staff at Spanish public universities. The Workplace Intergenerational Climate Scale questionnaire was administered to 1,751 Spanish academics. The findings reveal that teaching staff exhibit certain age-related stereotypes that influence communication. When intergenerational communication is perceived as effective, it tends to focus predominantly on academic tasks. Age-related differences and associated beliefs significantly influence the quality, quantity and nature of intergenerational interactions. Additionally, other variables such as gender, institutional size and the intensification of managerial responsibilities play important roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70078","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145529744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Argument-based pedagogies have the potential to help develop knowledge and 21st-century skills in university students. However, our knowledge of the processes and outcomes of argument-based pedagogies in higher education is scattered. To provide an overview of how argumentation is studied and promoted in higher education, a systematic scoping review was conducted across four databases. A total of 129 empirical articles published between 2008 and 2023 were analysed. The results show a growing interest in the field in recent years, with studies distributed around the world, although to a lesser degree in Latin America and Africa, and more studies focusing on “learning to argue” (LTA) than “arguing to learn” (ATL). In terms of activities promoting argumentation, a variety emerged, with a focus on active learning methodologies such as dialogic argumentation instruction, argumentative inquiry, and argument mapping. Other known active learning methods such as structured debate, role-playing, or game-based learning appeared less frequently in our corpus. Moreover, there were observable differences between the LTA and ATL studies, in particular when it comes to the field of study, with the former being more applied in social sciences and the latter more present in sciences. Implications for higher education practices and policies are discussed.
{"title":"Promoting Argumentation Skills Among University Students: A Scoping Review","authors":"Ingrid González, Chrysi Rapanta, Antonia Larrain","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Argument-based pedagogies have the potential to help develop knowledge and 21st-century skills in university students. However, our knowledge of the processes and outcomes of argument-based pedagogies in higher education is scattered. To provide an overview of how argumentation is studied and promoted in higher education, a systematic scoping review was conducted across four databases. A total of 129 empirical articles published between 2008 and 2023 were analysed. The results show a growing interest in the field in recent years, with studies distributed around the world, although to a lesser degree in Latin America and Africa, and more studies focusing on “learning to argue” (LTA) than “arguing to learn” (ATL). In terms of activities promoting argumentation, a variety emerged, with a focus on active learning methodologies such as dialogic argumentation instruction, argumentative inquiry, and argument mapping. Other known active learning methods such as structured debate, role-playing, or game-based learning appeared less frequently in our corpus. Moreover, there were observable differences between the LTA and ATL studies, in particular when it comes to the field of study, with the former being more applied in social sciences and the latter more present in sciences. Implications for higher education practices and policies are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145529813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}