Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920024904-0
The research is devoted to the problem of studying mechanisms of influence of gender inequality on career success of working women. The aim of the study is to find the connection between manifestations of gender inequality and resources available for development in the workplace and the career success of a woman. A socio-psychological model of success factors for working women was developed, including both the organizational environment and career resources for predicting success. The study was conducted in two phases in 2020–2021 using an online survey on a sample of women working in organizations in different fields. In the first phase (206 women aged 19 to 62), the relationships of the individual constructs of the model were tested; in the second phase (781 women aged 18 to 82), the socio-psychological model was tested by structural modelling (SEM). The results of the study confirm a positive relationship of women's career success with the availability of organizational resources (R=0.56, p
本研究致力于研究性别不平等对职业妇女职业成功的影响机制问题。这项研究的目的是找出两性不平等的表现与工作场所发展可利用的资源和妇女的事业成功之间的联系。建立了职业妇女成功因素的社会心理学模型，包括预测成功的组织环境和职业资源。该研究在2020-2021年分两个阶段进行，对在不同领域的组织工作的女性样本进行了在线调查。在第一阶段(206名年龄在19至62岁之间的女性)，测试了模型的个体结构之间的关系;在第二阶段(781名年龄在18至82岁之间的女性)，通过结构建模(SEM)对社会心理学模型进行了测试。研究结果证实了女性的职业成功与组织资源的可用性呈正相关(R=0.56, p
{"title":"Gender Inequality at Work as a Factor of Women's Career Success","authors":"","doi":"10.31857/s020595920024904-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920024904-0","url":null,"abstract":"The research is devoted to the problem of studying mechanisms of influence of gender inequality on career success of working women. The aim of the study is to find the connection between manifestations of gender inequality and resources available for development in the workplace and the career success of a woman. A socio-psychological model of success factors for working women was developed, including both the organizational environment and career resources for predicting success. The study was conducted in two phases in 2020–2021 using an online survey on a sample of women working in organizations in different fields. In the first phase (206 women aged 19 to 62), the relationships of the individual constructs of the model were tested; in the second phase (781 women aged 18 to 82), the socio-psychological model was tested by structural modelling (SEM). The results of the study confirm a positive relationship of women's career success with the availability of organizational resources (R=0.56, p","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76452914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920024905-1
A. Sidorenkov
The relationship of cohesion and productivity norms (including their combination with each other) to perceived subject-activity effectiveness (fulfillment of the plan and current tasks, success of activity in difficult conditions) and socio-psychological effectiveness (group/subgroup satisfaction, psychological comfort in the group/subgroup) of small production groups and informal subgroups has been studied. The study was conducted among 39 production groups (N=349 employees) in different occupational areas, most of which were dominated by joint-individual forms of organization. All of the surveyed groups were found to have stable informal subgroups, the number of which varied from one to three. Cohesion within groups and subgroups was positively and significantly more strongly related to socio-psychological effectiveness than to subject-activity effectiveness. This relationship is stronger in groups compared to subgroups. The subgroups’ norm of productivity has a significant positive correlation with their fulfillment of the plan and current tasks. No significant correlation was found between the groups’ productivity norm and any indicator of their subject-activity effectiveness. The norm of productivity and cohesion creates a positive interactive effect regarding the success of the groups in difficult conditions and the subgroups’ fulfillment of plan and current tasks. The findings extend the understanding of the direct and mediated links between cohesion and productivity norms and the two types of effectiveness of small production groups and the informal subgroups formed in them.
{"title":"Cohesion, Productivity Norms and Effectiveness of Small Production Groups and Informal Subgroups","authors":"A. Sidorenkov","doi":"10.31857/s020595920024905-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920024905-1","url":null,"abstract":"The relationship of cohesion and productivity norms (including their combination with each other) to perceived subject-activity effectiveness (fulfillment of the plan and current tasks, success of activity in difficult conditions) and socio-psychological effectiveness (group/subgroup satisfaction, psychological comfort in the group/subgroup) of small production groups and informal subgroups has been studied. The study was conducted among 39 production groups (N=349 employees) in different occupational areas, most of which were dominated by joint-individual forms of organization. All of the surveyed groups were found to have stable informal subgroups, the number of which varied from one to three. Cohesion within groups and subgroups was positively and significantly more strongly related to socio-psychological effectiveness than to subject-activity effectiveness. This relationship is stronger in groups compared to subgroups. The subgroups’ norm of productivity has a significant positive correlation with their fulfillment of the plan and current tasks. No significant correlation was found between the groups’ productivity norm and any indicator of their subject-activity effectiveness. The norm of productivity and cohesion creates a positive interactive effect regarding the success of the groups in difficult conditions and the subgroups’ fulfillment of plan and current tasks. The findings extend the understanding of the direct and mediated links between cohesion and productivity norms and the two types of effectiveness of small production groups and the informal subgroups formed in them.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91068426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920027089-3
O. Noskova
The article discusses debatable issues of ideology, the relevance of their discussion not only for social science, but also for modern psychology. The ultimate goal of the author is to carry out a historical and psychological reconstruction of the doctrine of ideology in the work of A.A. Bogdanov (Malinovsky) (1873–1928). The focus is on Bogdanov's concept of ideology as part of the culture of society, its forms, phenomena, genesis, functions, variability, research method, possibilities of influence and prediction, which are considered from the standpoint of “General organizational science — tectology” and “philosophy of living experience”. The views of A. Bogdanov can be useful not only to modern representatives of many social sciences, but, first of all, to social psychologists studying macropsychological problems, specialists in the field of historical psychology, as well as historians of Russian psychology at the beginning of the 20th century.
{"title":"Ideology as a Subject of Research in the Works of Alexander Bogdanov (to the 150th Anniversary of his Birth)","authors":"O. Noskova","doi":"10.31857/s020595920027089-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920027089-3","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses debatable issues of ideology, the relevance of their discussion not only for social science, but also for modern psychology. The ultimate goal of the author is to carry out a historical and psychological reconstruction of the doctrine of ideology in the work of A.A. Bogdanov (Malinovsky) (1873–1928). The focus is on Bogdanov's concept of ideology as part of the culture of society, its forms, phenomena, genesis, functions, variability, research method, possibilities of influence and prediction, which are considered from the standpoint of “General organizational science — tectology” and “philosophy of living experience”. The views of A. Bogdanov can be useful not only to modern representatives of many social sciences, but, first of all, to social psychologists studying macropsychological problems, specialists in the field of historical psychology, as well as historians of Russian psychology at the beginning of the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135846381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920027084-8
N. V. Murashcenkova
The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the relationships between the components of planned emigration behavior and the values among students aged 18–25 from Belarus (n = 208, 25% men, mean age = 19.8), Kazakhstan (n = 200, 26% men, mean age = 20.5) and Russia (n = 250, 25% men, mean age = 20.0). Results of testing of multigroup model of author’s questionnaire “Planned emigration behavior” and cross-cultural analysis of the manifestations of values and components of planned emigration behavior among students from three countries are presented in the first part of the article in the previous issue of the journal. In this part of the article we discuss the results of multigroup path analysis. We have identified identical and culturally specific links between the components of planned emigration behavior and the values among students from the three countries. Self-transcendence values are not involved in shaping of the planned emigration behavior of students from the three countries. Among Russians the self-enhancement values are positively linked with positive attitudes towards emigration, and the openness to change values are positively related to perceived behavioral control. Among Kazakhstanis, all factors of planned emigration behavior are negatively related to the conservation values, and subjective norms and attitudes towards emigration are positively related to the self-enhancement values. Among Belarusians, the conservation values are negatively related to subjective norms and attitudes towards emigration.
{"title":"Relationship of Values and Planned Emigration Behavior Among Students from Three Countries. Part II. Multigroup Analysis","authors":"N. V. Murashcenkova","doi":"10.31857/s020595920027084-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920027084-8","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the relationships between the components of planned emigration behavior and the values among students aged 18–25 from Belarus (n = 208, 25% men, mean age = 19.8), Kazakhstan (n = 200, 26% men, mean age = 20.5) and Russia (n = 250, 25% men, mean age = 20.0). Results of testing of multigroup model of author’s questionnaire “Planned emigration behavior” and cross-cultural analysis of the manifestations of values and components of planned emigration behavior among students from three countries are presented in the first part of the article in the previous issue of the journal. In this part of the article we discuss the results of multigroup path analysis. We have identified identical and culturally specific links between the components of planned emigration behavior and the values among students from the three countries. Self-transcendence values are not involved in shaping of the planned emigration behavior of students from the three countries. Among Russians the self-enhancement values are positively linked with positive attitudes towards emigration, and the openness to change values are positively related to perceived behavioral control. Among Kazakhstanis, all factors of planned emigration behavior are negatively related to the conservation values, and subjective norms and attitudes towards emigration are positively related to the self-enhancement values. Among Belarusians, the conservation values are negatively related to subjective norms and attitudes towards emigration.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135846389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920027091-6
M. Guseltseva
The article is a response to the publications of A.L. Zhuravlev and E.A. Sergienko, inviting to a discussion on the development of psychological concepts. The view on the correlation of network and system methodology is specified. It is argued that the systematic approach cannot become a thing of the past, since the principle of consistency is one of the methodological prerequisites of psychological science. However, the era of non-classical psychology with its monopoly on the dominant discourse and the correct approach, the only true methodology, the idea of an invariable hierarchy of concepts, is becoming the past. The configuration of the ratios of network and system methodology in psychological research is mobile, changing depending on the chosen perspective and the problem being solved. The contribution of scientists from the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences to the development of an optimal model that combines the positions of network and system methodology is noted. The differentiation of concepts based on the levels of methodology of science is discussed, in accordance with which philosophical categories, general scientific and interdisciplinary concepts, specific scientific (general psychological and sectoral) concepts and metaphorical constructs are distinguished. This kind of analysis and development of psychological concepts in themselves change the model of scientific knowledge, since they create not only a conceptual, but also a theoretical network, where different approaches, previously ignoring or opposing each other at earlier stages of the development of science, become mutually complementary parts of the whole psychological science. produce a more subtle understanding of multidimensional psychological reality. The objectivity of this trend in the general context of the evolution of science is confirmed by the growth of agency and self-reflexivity of Russian scientists, expressed in work on psychological concepts, spontaneously arising in various research projects, psychological schools and institutions.
{"title":"On the Development of Concepts in Modern Russian Psychology","authors":"M. Guseltseva","doi":"10.31857/s020595920027091-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920027091-6","url":null,"abstract":"The article is a response to the publications of A.L. Zhuravlev and E.A. Sergienko, inviting to a discussion on the development of psychological concepts. The view on the correlation of network and system methodology is specified. It is argued that the systematic approach cannot become a thing of the past, since the principle of consistency is one of the methodological prerequisites of psychological science. However, the era of non-classical psychology with its monopoly on the dominant discourse and the correct approach, the only true methodology, the idea of an invariable hierarchy of concepts, is becoming the past. The configuration of the ratios of network and system methodology in psychological research is mobile, changing depending on the chosen perspective and the problem being solved. The contribution of scientists from the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences to the development of an optimal model that combines the positions of network and system methodology is noted. The differentiation of concepts based on the levels of methodology of science is discussed, in accordance with which philosophical categories, general scientific and interdisciplinary concepts, specific scientific (general psychological and sectoral) concepts and metaphorical constructs are distinguished. This kind of analysis and development of psychological concepts in themselves change the model of scientific knowledge, since they create not only a conceptual, but also a theoretical network, where different approaches, previously ignoring or opposing each other at earlier stages of the development of science, become mutually complementary parts of the whole psychological science. produce a more subtle understanding of multidimensional psychological reality. The objectivity of this trend in the general context of the evolution of science is confirmed by the growth of agency and self-reflexivity of Russian scientists, expressed in work on psychological concepts, spontaneously arising in various research projects, psychological schools and institutions.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135846658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920024339-8
V. Nosulenko
A number of examples of the development of B.F. Lomov’ ideas in research related to the most popular areas of psychological science and practice are presented. It is shown that many of the ideas are in the general trend of modern works. In particular, the integrative approach, built on the systems idea provides answers to many questions of the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods, which are now being discussed intensively in connection with the practical problems of organizing interdisciplinary research. Meanwhile, the development of the idea of system integration of different approaches and methods ensured the creation of a toolkit developed in detail and tested in many academic and applied research. The cognitive-communicative approach, the impetus for the development of which was the ideas of B.F. Lomov on the relationship between cognition and communication, found its embodiment in the development of the problem of joint activity and formed the basis for the implementation of numerous projects related, in particular, to the management of big technical systems and the procuring of scientific and organizational activities, including the creation of new information and communication technologies. The activity design paradigm continues to be in demand for the problems of interaction between man and modern technology and for solving issues of mismatch between the goals of developing new technologies and their use. Particularly relevant are the claims of the anthropocentric approach that any technology, including artificial intelligence, is a means of achieving the goals set by man. Modern research carried out in the activity design paradigm confirms the fruitfulness of this paradigm for progress in the field of creating promising technologies. These studies received a new perspective of their development in connection with the tasks of preserving and transferring cognitive experience in solving the problems of capitalization of knowledge and the preservation of human capital. By analogy with “activity design”, these tasks are interpreted as “designing the perceived quality” of experience.
{"title":"B.F. Lomov in Modern Interdisciplinary Research","authors":"V. Nosulenko","doi":"10.31857/s020595920024339-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920024339-8","url":null,"abstract":"A number of examples of the development of B.F. Lomov’ ideas in research related to the most popular areas of psychological science and practice are presented. It is shown that many of the ideas are in the general trend of modern works. In particular, the integrative approach, built on the systems idea provides answers to many questions of the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods, which are now being discussed intensively in connection with the practical problems of organizing interdisciplinary research. Meanwhile, the development of the idea of system integration of different approaches and methods ensured the creation of a toolkit developed in detail and tested in many academic and applied research. The cognitive-communicative approach, the impetus for the development of which was the ideas of B.F. Lomov on the relationship between cognition and communication, found its embodiment in the development of the problem of joint activity and formed the basis for the implementation of numerous projects related, in particular, to the management of big technical systems and the procuring of scientific and organizational activities, including the creation of new information and communication technologies. The activity design paradigm continues to be in demand for the problems of interaction between man and modern technology and for solving issues of mismatch between the goals of developing new technologies and their use. Particularly relevant are the claims of the anthropocentric approach that any technology, including artificial intelligence, is a means of achieving the goals set by man. Modern research carried out in the activity design paradigm confirms the fruitfulness of this paradigm for progress in the field of creating promising technologies. These studies received a new perspective of their development in connection with the tasks of preserving and transferring cognitive experience in solving the problems of capitalization of knowledge and the preservation of human capital. By analogy with “activity design”, these tasks are interpreted as “designing the perceived quality” of experience.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74288186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920026158-9
A. Zhuravlev
In the article the authors turn to the study of the development of the scientific field of psychology of morality at the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2002–2021. The Institute's publications on the psychology of morality (monographs and collections of scientific works, a total of 20 books) were used as research material. It describes the corpus of the analyzed publications, bibliometric indicators that determine the characteristics of the formation of a scientific direction in a research center. The first part of the article considers the indicators of the dynamics of the number and volume of publications, frequency of authors, frequency of word combinations, and keywords. It is determined that the scientific direction of psychology of morality was actively developed at the Institute of Psychology (especially in 2007–2011 and 2012–2016), the merged research community was narrow and consisted mainly of employees of the Institute. The substantive characteristics of moral-psychological research were an appeal to the moral aspects of economic activity, moral problems and the state of modern Russian society, spiritual and moral education and personal development. A conclusion is made about the main trajectory of development of the direction of moral psychology at the Institute of Psychology.
{"title":"Quantitative Analysis of the Publications of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the Scientific Direction of Psychology of Morality in 2002–2021. Part I. Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"A. Zhuravlev","doi":"10.31857/s020595920026158-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920026158-9","url":null,"abstract":"In the article the authors turn to the study of the development of the scientific field of psychology of morality at the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2002–2021. The Institute's publications on the psychology of morality (monographs and collections of scientific works, a total of 20 books) were used as research material. It describes the corpus of the analyzed publications, bibliometric indicators that determine the characteristics of the formation of a scientific direction in a research center. The first part of the article considers the indicators of the dynamics of the number and volume of publications, frequency of authors, frequency of word combinations, and keywords. It is determined that the scientific direction of psychology of morality was actively developed at the Institute of Psychology (especially in 2007–2011 and 2012–2016), the merged research community was narrow and consisted mainly of employees of the Institute. The substantive characteristics of moral-psychological research were an appeal to the moral aspects of economic activity, moral problems and the state of modern Russian society, spiritual and moral education and personal development. A conclusion is made about the main trajectory of development of the direction of moral psychology at the Institute of Psychology.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87920160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920027725-3
Dmitrii S. Kornienko
The purpose of this study is to adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire used to measure the characteristics of the Light Triad model. The Light Triad consists of three characteristics: Faith in humanity, Humanism and Kantianism. As a counterpoint to the Dark Triad model, the Light Triad model emphasizes the importance of studying positive or prosocial personality traits instead of focusing on negative characteristics. The study included 576 participants aged 17 to 25, with 437 of them being women. Respondents completed three questionnaires: the Light Triad Adapted Questionnaire, the Dark Tetrad Short Questionnaire, and the Big Five Short Questionnaire. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of the Light Triad questionnaire, and the fit indices were comparable to those from the original study of the Light Triad questionnaire and other adaptations. The scales of the Light Triad questionnaire demonstrate sufficient reliability and align with the findings of other adaptation studies. The convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire is acceptable. In contrast to the scale of Kantianism, the scales of Faith in humanity and Humanism are similar in terms of content. The characteristics of the Light Triad have negative associations (mild or moderate correlations) with the scales of the Dark Tetrad, which enhances the reliability of the construct. There are positive correlations between the Light Triad and the Big Five traits. Positive associations between the Light Triad trait and the Agreeableness trait raise questions about a potential overlap between these characteristics. Taking into account its limitations, an adapted questionnaire can be used in research. However, further investigation is needed to assess its psychometric features.
{"title":"“Light Triad”: Adaptation and Psychometric Indicators","authors":"Dmitrii S. Kornienko","doi":"10.31857/s020595920027725-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920027725-3","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire used to measure the characteristics of the Light Triad model. The Light Triad consists of three characteristics: Faith in humanity, Humanism and Kantianism. As a counterpoint to the Dark Triad model, the Light Triad model emphasizes the importance of studying positive or prosocial personality traits instead of focusing on negative characteristics. The study included 576 participants aged 17 to 25, with 437 of them being women. Respondents completed three questionnaires: the Light Triad Adapted Questionnaire, the Dark Tetrad Short Questionnaire, and the Big Five Short Questionnaire. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of the Light Triad questionnaire, and the fit indices were comparable to those from the original study of the Light Triad questionnaire and other adaptations. The scales of the Light Triad questionnaire demonstrate sufficient reliability and align with the findings of other adaptation studies. The convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire is acceptable. In contrast to the scale of Kantianism, the scales of Faith in humanity and Humanism are similar in terms of content. The characteristics of the Light Triad have negative associations (mild or moderate correlations) with the scales of the Dark Tetrad, which enhances the reliability of the construct. There are positive correlations between the Light Triad and the Big Five traits. Positive associations between the Light Triad trait and the Agreeableness trait raise questions about a potential overlap between these characteristics. Taking into account its limitations, an adapted questionnaire can be used in research. However, further investigation is needed to assess its psychometric features.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135846380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920027087-1
T. Kubrak
One of the important tasks for Russian film researchers is to find relevant psychological concepts to describe the process of interaction between the viewer and the film, as well as to form appropriate psychometric tools, which are currently absent in Russian psychology. The article presents the results of adaptation and approbation of the Transportation Scale (TS), developed by M. Green and T. Brock for measuring the transportation — a special state of the involvement and immersion in the narrative (story). A total of 1171 Russian-speaking students from 17 to 29 years old (M = 19.8; SD = 1.9; 577 men and 594 women) took part in approbation of the technique. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure, although it also revealed differences with it in the distribution of items. Confirmatory factor analysis did not empirically support the original model, while the new model showed good correspondence with the empirical data. Russian version of the Transportation Scale showed good internal consistency. Convergent validity is confirmed by the presence of significant correlations with the components of “experience in the activity” (positive correlations with pleasure and meaning, negative with void and effort), as well as direct connections with empathy and the need for cognition. For verification of criterion validity, a part of the respondents was re-interviewed using another stimulus material (film). The results present transportation as an unstable state, caused each time by a particular film, and also demonstrate the dependence of transportation on the quality of the narrative. The psychometric assessment showed that the Russian version of the Transportation Scale is a reliable and valid tool that can now be used to study transportation and its effects in a Russian sample, as well as to conduct cross-cultural research in this area.
{"title":"Approbation of the Russian Version of Transportation Scale (TS)","authors":"T. Kubrak","doi":"10.31857/s020595920027087-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920027087-1","url":null,"abstract":"One of the important tasks for Russian film researchers is to find relevant psychological concepts to describe the process of interaction between the viewer and the film, as well as to form appropriate psychometric tools, which are currently absent in Russian psychology. The article presents the results of adaptation and approbation of the Transportation Scale (TS), developed by M. Green and T. Brock for measuring the transportation — a special state of the involvement and immersion in the narrative (story). A total of 1171 Russian-speaking students from 17 to 29 years old (M = 19.8; SD = 1.9; 577 men and 594 women) took part in approbation of the technique. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure, although it also revealed differences with it in the distribution of items. Confirmatory factor analysis did not empirically support the original model, while the new model showed good correspondence with the empirical data. Russian version of the Transportation Scale showed good internal consistency. Convergent validity is confirmed by the presence of significant correlations with the components of “experience in the activity” (positive correlations with pleasure and meaning, negative with void and effort), as well as direct connections with empathy and the need for cognition. For verification of criterion validity, a part of the respondents was re-interviewed using another stimulus material (film). The results present transportation as an unstable state, caused each time by a particular film, and also demonstrate the dependence of transportation on the quality of the narrative. The psychometric assessment showed that the Russian version of the Transportation Scale is a reliable and valid tool that can now be used to study transportation and its effects in a Russian sample, as well as to conduct cross-cultural research in this area.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135846384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.31857/s020595920026161-3
N. Grishina
In the context of changes in modern reality, leading to the emergence of a new phenomenology and new concepts included in the scientific discourse of psychology, there is a need for methodological reflection, clarification of the subject field, conceptual and categorical apparatus of psychological science. The subject of the article is a discussion of the works of A.L. Zhuravleva and E.A. Sergienko devoted to the analysis of the conceptual apparatus of psychological science. Based on the fact that at the present stage of development of psychological knowledge, the previous coordinates of considering psychological concepts are not enough, and referring to the principles of constructing a system of psychological concepts, formulated by the classics of Russian psychology, the authors propose a system-network principle for describing the conceptual apparatus. The scale of the tasks set by the authors does not imply simple and unambiguous solutions. The logic of the modern methodological analysis of psychological concepts should be associated with the understanding of the modern world as indefinite, changeable, incomplete, redundant and diverse. Based on the discussion of the methodological proposals of A.L. Zhuravleva and E.A. Sergienko, the article formulates the actual tasks of their development — the creation of universal criteria for the systematization of psychological concepts and a universal algorithm for their description, which will make it possible to introduce rigor into the formation of the conceptual apparatus due to a more correct determination of the status of new concepts introduced into scientific discourse, as well as the use of related concepts sciences, etc. The solution of these and other tasks to clarify the conceptual apparatus and categorical structure of modern psychology can become a significant contribution to domestic psychological science.
{"title":"To the Problem of the Evolution of the Conceptual Apparatus of Psychology: from the Past to the Future","authors":"N. Grishina","doi":"10.31857/s020595920026161-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920026161-3","url":null,"abstract":"In the context of changes in modern reality, leading to the emergence of a new phenomenology and new concepts included in the scientific discourse of psychology, there is a need for methodological reflection, clarification of the subject field, conceptual and categorical apparatus of psychological science. The subject of the article is a discussion of the works of A.L. Zhuravleva and E.A. Sergienko devoted to the analysis of the conceptual apparatus of psychological science. Based on the fact that at the present stage of development of psychological knowledge, the previous coordinates of considering psychological concepts are not enough, and referring to the principles of constructing a system of psychological concepts, formulated by the classics of Russian psychology, the authors propose a system-network principle for describing the conceptual apparatus. The scale of the tasks set by the authors does not imply simple and unambiguous solutions. The logic of the modern methodological analysis of psychological concepts should be associated with the understanding of the modern world as indefinite, changeable, incomplete, redundant and diverse. Based on the discussion of the methodological proposals of A.L. Zhuravleva and E.A. Sergienko, the article formulates the actual tasks of their development — the creation of universal criteria for the systematization of psychological concepts and a universal algorithm for their description, which will make it possible to introduce rigor into the formation of the conceptual apparatus due to a more correct determination of the status of new concepts introduced into scientific discourse, as well as the use of related concepts sciences, etc. The solution of these and other tasks to clarify the conceptual apparatus and categorical structure of modern psychology can become a significant contribution to domestic psychological science.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74720326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：