Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) is a rare cause of meningitis in healthy adults. We report the case of a healthy 33-year-old man with acute GBS meningitis who experienced relapsed high-grade fever and increased intracranial pressure following completing intravenous antibiotics. A short course of corticosteroids, along with additional antibiotics, improved the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile, and no further complications occurred after the recurrent episodes. The study highlights the need to consider significant CSF inflammation and potential neurological complications in acute GBS meningitis patients, even in the absence of immunodeficiency or previous surgeries. One of the possible routes of infection in our case was suspected from a history of nasal mucosal damage. The importance of careful monitoring and treatment adjustments should be performed and correlated with clinical signs and symptoms.
{"title":"A relapse of acute group B streptococcus meningitis in a healthy adult: Case report and review of the literatures","authors":"Wannisa Wongpipathpong MD, Pornrujee Hirunpat MD, Suppachok Kirdlarp MD, Somnuek Sungkanuparph MD","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.70039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.70039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i> (GBS) is a rare cause of meningitis in healthy adults. We report the case of a healthy 33-year-old man with acute GBS meningitis who experienced relapsed high-grade fever and increased intracranial pressure following completing intravenous antibiotics. A short course of corticosteroids, along with additional antibiotics, improved the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile, and no further complications occurred after the recurrent episodes. The study highlights the need to consider significant CSF inflammation and potential neurological complications in acute GBS meningitis patients, even in the absence of immunodeficiency or previous surgeries. One of the possible routes of infection in our case was suspected from a history of nasal mucosal damage. The importance of careful monitoring and treatment adjustments should be performed and correlated with clinical signs and symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 5","pages":"485-489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.70039","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is a major concern in aging populations. AP management requires a comprehensive, multimodal approach—notably including swallowing rehabilitation, oral care, and risk factor management. This scoping review evaluates evidence on swallowing rehabilitation for AP, which consists of compensatory strategies and exercise training. A systematic literature search identified 23 eligible studies from 522 articles; four directly investigated swallowing rehabilitation in AP, while 19 focused on patients with dysphagia due to stroke, neurological diseases, or aging. Two large-scale retrospective AP-specific studies demonstrated a correlation between rehabilitation and improved oral intake but did not evaluate AP prevention or specify effective components. In one study, water jelly ingestion reduced AP incidence. Another study demonstrated the benefits of texture-modified diets in reducing aspiration risk, although AP prevention was not assessed. While clinically compensatory strategies remain foundational, current evidence does not support routine exercise-based interventions for AP prevention. Further high-quality studies are needed.
{"title":"Swallowing rehabilitation in aspiration pneumonia: A scoping review of compensatory strategies and exercise training effectiveness","authors":"Akihito Ueda MD, Kanji Nohara DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.70047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is a major concern in aging populations. AP management requires a comprehensive, multimodal approach—notably including swallowing rehabilitation, oral care, and risk factor management. This scoping review evaluates evidence on swallowing rehabilitation for AP, which consists of compensatory strategies and exercise training. A systematic literature search identified 23 eligible studies from 522 articles; four directly investigated swallowing rehabilitation in AP, while 19 focused on patients with dysphagia due to stroke, neurological diseases, or aging. Two large-scale retrospective AP-specific studies demonstrated a correlation between rehabilitation and improved oral intake but did not evaluate AP prevention or specify effective components. In one study, water jelly ingestion reduced AP incidence. Another study demonstrated the benefits of texture-modified diets in reducing aspiration risk, although AP prevention was not assessed. While clinically compensatory strategies remain foundational, current evidence does not support routine exercise-based interventions for AP prevention. Further high-quality studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"523-533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.70047","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145436306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kosuke Ishizuka MD, PhD, Taiju Miyagami MD, PhD, Yohei Kanzawa MD, Aiko Harada MD, Dai Aoki MD, Yoshiki Umezawa MD, Masataka Ono MD, So Sakamoto MD, PhD
<p>Effective collaboration between specialist and primary care physicians is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring appropriate medical resource use.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> However, their different perspectives can create barriers to care.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Referral of patients from primary care to specialist physicians can result in gaps in diagnostic workup and treatment, leading to unnecessary tests or delays.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> Moreover, the lack of standards for consultation timing and information sharing contributes to misunderstandings. To address these issues, we—members of the Junior Doctors Association of the Japanese Society of Hospital General Medicine (JSHGM)—propose the “5G Approach,” (1. Gray Tolerance, 2. Guiding Criteria, 3. Gradual Transition, 4. Ground-Level Coordination, and 5. Growth Through Follow-up) five principles to promote effective collaboration between primary care and specialist physicians (Table 1). These principles were developed through a narrative literature review and discussions among eight primary care physicians with a median of 10 years' experience. The framework reflects clinical realities based on challenges from acute care settings and aligns with established concepts in the literature on collaborative care.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> It has been informally applied in case discussions to improve communication between primary care and specialist physicians.</p><p>In primary care, treatment plans are often made before confirming the diagnosis.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Primary care physicians must make decisions to mitigate risk while navigating uncertainty.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Specialist physicians, in turn, are expected to understand and respond appropriately to this uncertainty.<span><sup>1, 6</sup></span> However, discrepancies in perception may arise between the two regarding the degree of diagnostic certainty.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> To prevent this, primary care physicians must acknowledge and share diagnostic uncertainty with specialist physicians,<span><sup>6</sup></span> clearly communicating which aspects of the diagnosis are certain and which are uncertain, and specialist physicians should use this information to respond flexibly and manage time effectively.</p><p>To facilitate the transition from primary care to specialist care, the appropriate timing of consultations and the criteria for transfer need to be clarified.<span><sup>1, 2, 7</sup></span> In practice, lack of clarity can result in missed opportunities for timely interventions.<span><sup>1, 2, 7</sup></span> Thus, setting clear criteria for specialist consultation and patient transfer from primary to specialist care is necessary.<span><sup>1, 2, 7</sup></span> Moreover, even when the diagnosis is uncertain, sharing transfer criteria can streamline care, promote appropriate medical resource use, and optimize patient outcomes.<span><sup>1, 2, 7</sup></span></p><p>Depending on the patient's
{"title":"5G approach: Enhancing collaboration between primary care and specialist physicians","authors":"Kosuke Ishizuka MD, PhD, Taiju Miyagami MD, PhD, Yohei Kanzawa MD, Aiko Harada MD, Dai Aoki MD, Yoshiki Umezawa MD, Masataka Ono MD, So Sakamoto MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.70049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective collaboration between specialist and primary care physicians is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring appropriate medical resource use.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> However, their different perspectives can create barriers to care.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Referral of patients from primary care to specialist physicians can result in gaps in diagnostic workup and treatment, leading to unnecessary tests or delays.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> Moreover, the lack of standards for consultation timing and information sharing contributes to misunderstandings. To address these issues, we—members of the Junior Doctors Association of the Japanese Society of Hospital General Medicine (JSHGM)—propose the “5G Approach,” (1. Gray Tolerance, 2. Guiding Criteria, 3. Gradual Transition, 4. Ground-Level Coordination, and 5. Growth Through Follow-up) five principles to promote effective collaboration between primary care and specialist physicians (Table 1). These principles were developed through a narrative literature review and discussions among eight primary care physicians with a median of 10 years' experience. The framework reflects clinical realities based on challenges from acute care settings and aligns with established concepts in the literature on collaborative care.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> It has been informally applied in case discussions to improve communication between primary care and specialist physicians.</p><p>In primary care, treatment plans are often made before confirming the diagnosis.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Primary care physicians must make decisions to mitigate risk while navigating uncertainty.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Specialist physicians, in turn, are expected to understand and respond appropriately to this uncertainty.<span><sup>1, 6</sup></span> However, discrepancies in perception may arise between the two regarding the degree of diagnostic certainty.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> To prevent this, primary care physicians must acknowledge and share diagnostic uncertainty with specialist physicians,<span><sup>6</sup></span> clearly communicating which aspects of the diagnosis are certain and which are uncertain, and specialist physicians should use this information to respond flexibly and manage time effectively.</p><p>To facilitate the transition from primary care to specialist care, the appropriate timing of consultations and the criteria for transfer need to be clarified.<span><sup>1, 2, 7</sup></span> In practice, lack of clarity can result in missed opportunities for timely interventions.<span><sup>1, 2, 7</sup></span> Thus, setting clear criteria for specialist consultation and patient transfer from primary to specialist care is necessary.<span><sup>1, 2, 7</sup></span> Moreover, even when the diagnosis is uncertain, sharing transfer criteria can streamline care, promote appropriate medical resource use, and optimize patient outcomes.<span><sup>1, 2, 7</sup></span></p><p>Depending on the patient's","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"26 5","pages":"495-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.70049","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}