Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2023.2186801
Janice G. Thorpe, Sherwyn P. Morreale
{"title":"Immediacy and presence: reflections on an interdisciplinary and rhetorical approach to teaching and learning in the online environment","authors":"Janice G. Thorpe, Sherwyn P. Morreale","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2023.2186801","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2023.2186801","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42705142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2023.2172358
N. Egbunike
ABSTRACT Studies on the storytelling narratives of social media users have understandably emphasized the typology, interpersonal dynamics, trust, and disinformation that emanate from these virtual communities. This study extends this scholarly conversation by investigating both the storytelling and the narratives generated by Nigerian social media communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Communication Infrastructure Theory served as framework, while a mixed method triangulation was employed. During a 3-month (May 2 to August 3, 2020) digital ethnographic participant-observation, a total of 153 manually purposive samples from social media (Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube) were analyzed. Twenty themes emerged from the quantitative content analysis of the COVID-19 storytelling of Nigerian social media users. Findings also showed multilayered digital storytelling narratives that possessed popular validity, debunked disinformation, and provided narratives that mitigated the spread of coronavirus. The findings also suggest that applying journalistic contextual knowledge on the COVID-19 social media storytelling narratives provided credible news sources for media stories.
{"title":"The COVID-19 storytelling narratives of Nigerian social media users","authors":"N. Egbunike","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2023.2172358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2023.2172358","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies on the storytelling narratives of social media users have understandably emphasized the typology, interpersonal dynamics, trust, and disinformation that emanate from these virtual communities. This study extends this scholarly conversation by investigating both the storytelling and the narratives generated by Nigerian social media communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Communication Infrastructure Theory served as framework, while a mixed method triangulation was employed. During a 3-month (May 2 to August 3, 2020) digital ethnographic participant-observation, a total of 153 manually purposive samples from social media (Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube) were analyzed. Twenty themes emerged from the quantitative content analysis of the COVID-19 storytelling of Nigerian social media users. Findings also showed multilayered digital storytelling narratives that possessed popular validity, debunked disinformation, and provided narratives that mitigated the spread of coronavirus. The findings also suggest that applying journalistic contextual knowledge on the COVID-19 social media storytelling narratives provided credible news sources for media stories.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"23 1","pages":"228 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44830418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2022.2161833
Desirée D. Rowe, M. Frischherz
{"title":"Introducing the anti-method paradigm [or, when reviewer #2 says your interdisciplinary work is vague, messy, and unrecognizable]","authors":"Desirée D. Rowe, M. Frischherz","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2161833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2161833","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43832422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-27DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2022.2123251
M. MacKay, A. Thaivalappil, Jennifer McWhirter, D. Gillis, A. Papadopoulos
ABSTRACT Although a large proportion of the Canadian population is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, millions of eligible individuals remain unvaccinated. Trust in public health and government impacts the effectiveness of crisis communication and the public’s willingness to follow health recommendations. This qualitative study involved semistructured interviews with 12 COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant adults in Canada. Using thematic analysis, four themes were generated, including (1) perceived low use of crisis communication guiding principles contributes to distrust in officials; (2) risk perception and decisions are influenced by a range of sources; (3) concerns regarding vaccine safety, the industry, and politicization of efforts are impacting trust; and (4) stigma around vaccine status further entrenches views and erodes trust. This study highlights the importance of trust and how vaccine hesitancy is fueled by perceived ineffective crisis communication by officials.
{"title":"“There was a lot of that [coercion and manipulation] happening and well, that’s not very trustworthy”: a qualitative study on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada","authors":"M. MacKay, A. Thaivalappil, Jennifer McWhirter, D. Gillis, A. Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2123251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2123251","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although a large proportion of the Canadian population is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, millions of eligible individuals remain unvaccinated. Trust in public health and government impacts the effectiveness of crisis communication and the public’s willingness to follow health recommendations. This qualitative study involved semistructured interviews with 12 COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant adults in Canada. Using thematic analysis, four themes were generated, including (1) perceived low use of crisis communication guiding principles contributes to distrust in officials; (2) risk perception and decisions are influenced by a range of sources; (3) concerns regarding vaccine safety, the industry, and politicization of efforts are impacting trust; and (4) stigma around vaccine status further entrenches views and erodes trust. This study highlights the importance of trust and how vaccine hesitancy is fueled by perceived ineffective crisis communication by officials.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"23 1","pages":"165 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45144866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2022.2114295
Yongjun Shin
ABSTRACT Communication research is interdisciplinary in nature. Many communication scholars have addressed the interdisciplinary nature of communication from diverse perspectives. While communication scholars have discussed the communicator, I propose introducing a sociological approach to the communication field, particularly drawing on relational sociology and practice/embodiment theory. And I discuss the link between the sociological theory and communication theories regarding identity and self. Finally, I suggest that communication research expand interdisciplinary collaboration with biological science, particularly neuroscience, for empirical research. Based on the discussion, I will conceptualize the communicator whose capacity and propensity for communicating (1) shift according to changing contexts and relationships, (2) are socially shaped and personally embodied throughout their life trajectory, and (3) can be empirically assessed through biological research. This theoretical modeling of the communicator also suggests pathways for interdisciplinary theoretical discussions and empirical inquiries about the ontology of the communicator in the field of communication.
{"title":"An interdisciplinary inquiry in the communicator: implications of relational social paradigm, practice theory, and biological science","authors":"Yongjun Shin","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2114295","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2114295","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Communication research is interdisciplinary in nature. Many communication scholars have addressed the interdisciplinary nature of communication from diverse perspectives. While communication scholars have discussed the communicator, I propose introducing a sociological approach to the communication field, particularly drawing on relational sociology and practice/embodiment theory. And I discuss the link between the sociological theory and communication theories regarding identity and self. Finally, I suggest that communication research expand interdisciplinary collaboration with biological science, particularly neuroscience, for empirical research. Based on the discussion, I will conceptualize the communicator whose capacity and propensity for communicating (1) shift according to changing contexts and relationships, (2) are socially shaped and personally embodied throughout their life trajectory, and (3) can be empirically assessed through biological research. This theoretical modeling of the communicator also suggests pathways for interdisciplinary theoretical discussions and empirical inquiries about the ontology of the communicator in the field of communication.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"23 1","pages":"122 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46188799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2022.2113424
Serena Miller
ABSTRACT Faculty members interested in creating creative scholarship face advancement obstacles due to few known tenure and promotion standards. This study involved qualitative semistructured interviews with U.S. communication and media creative faculty members producing scholarship spanning multiple mediums. Interviewed scholars primarily expressed their scholarship's contributions involved local community engagement. Yet creative scholars perceived departmental leadership preferred to rely on artistic and professional standards to evaluate the quality of their work rather than engaged criteria. Participants felt such criteria too narrowly constrained them and delegitimized the value of their work. The results provide evidence that creative scholars struggle when communicating their work's value and documenting their scholarship achievements. Guidance is provided through the formalization of a Creative Scholarship Pathways Framework conceptually made up of four evaluation concepts rooted in the engaged and creative scholarship literature: (1) collaboration, (2) outreach, (3) peer review, and (4) innovation.
{"title":"Reimagining tenure and promotion for creative faculty: the Creative Scholarship Pathways Framework","authors":"Serena Miller","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2113424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2113424","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Faculty members interested in creating creative scholarship face advancement obstacles due to few known tenure and promotion standards. This study involved qualitative semistructured interviews with U.S. communication and media creative faculty members producing scholarship spanning multiple mediums. Interviewed scholars primarily expressed their scholarship's contributions involved local community engagement. Yet creative scholars perceived departmental leadership preferred to rely on artistic and professional standards to evaluate the quality of their work rather than engaged criteria. Participants felt such criteria too narrowly constrained them and delegitimized the value of their work. The results provide evidence that creative scholars struggle when communicating their work's value and documenting their scholarship achievements. Guidance is provided through the formalization of a Creative Scholarship Pathways Framework conceptually made up of four evaluation concepts rooted in the engaged and creative scholarship literature: (1) collaboration, (2) outreach, (3) peer review, and (4) innovation.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"23 1","pages":"98 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59920579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2023.2207259
S. Croucher
Interdisciplinary research is research that draws on theories and methods from multiple disciplines. The fact that communication, as a field of study, is interdisciplinary is not new. Researchers have been discussing the interdisciplinarity of the field for decades. If you look through any book on the history of the discipline, you will find countless discussions of how the discipline we know today has drawn from and continues to draw from the countless humanities, social science, and more recently scientific disciplines. Reflecting on my own postgraduate education in communication, aside from what would be traditionally considered “Communication,” I read rhetoric (Aristotle to Burke), philosophy (Gebser, to Voltaire), Sociology and Anthropology (Hall to Butler), political science (Arendt), Economics (Keynes), as well as History (Eisenstein and Gaspard), to name a few. This interdisciplinary education has shaped how I and my postgraduate students conceptualise and operationalise “communication.” This diversity of perspective, which is increasingly common and accepted in the field, is what encouraged this themed issue for the Review of Communication. Miller’s piece, “Reimaging tenure and promotion for creative faculty: The Creative Scholarship Pathways Framework,” explored the struggles creative scholars experience when communicating their work’s value. Using semistructured interviews, Miller showed how creative researchers often conduct work involving numerous community members; however, this work is often not evaluated for its engagement. Miller formalizes a Creative Scholarship Pathways Framework to assist in evaluating such work rooted in the creative and engaged scholarship. This piece shows not only the mixing of various disciplines, but also the effects of not understanding interdisciplinary work within academia. Shin’s piece, “An interdisciplinary inquiry in the communicator: Implications of Relational Social Paradigm, Practice theory, and Biological Science,” proposes introducing a sociological approach to understanding the communicator in communication studies. Drawing specifically on relational sociology and practice/embodiment theory, Shin suggests communication should also expand in its borrowing from biological sciences. Through this analysis, Shin provides pathways for theoretical inquiries into the ontology of the communicator. Spencer and Graves’ analysis of “What communication brings to the study of gaslighting: Metatheory toward disciplinarity” argues that the interdisciplinary nature of communication provides a unique position for critique. Using the case of gaslighting, the authors argue that research in sociology, psychology, philosophy, and other disciplines will benefit from including a communication point of view. In particular, the gaslighting
{"title":"Introduction to the interdisciplinary nature of communication","authors":"S. Croucher","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2023.2207259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2023.2207259","url":null,"abstract":"Interdisciplinary research is research that draws on theories and methods from multiple disciplines. The fact that communication, as a field of study, is interdisciplinary is not new. Researchers have been discussing the interdisciplinarity of the field for decades. If you look through any book on the history of the discipline, you will find countless discussions of how the discipline we know today has drawn from and continues to draw from the countless humanities, social science, and more recently scientific disciplines. Reflecting on my own postgraduate education in communication, aside from what would be traditionally considered “Communication,” I read rhetoric (Aristotle to Burke), philosophy (Gebser, to Voltaire), Sociology and Anthropology (Hall to Butler), political science (Arendt), Economics (Keynes), as well as History (Eisenstein and Gaspard), to name a few. This interdisciplinary education has shaped how I and my postgraduate students conceptualise and operationalise “communication.” This diversity of perspective, which is increasingly common and accepted in the field, is what encouraged this themed issue for the Review of Communication. Miller’s piece, “Reimaging tenure and promotion for creative faculty: The Creative Scholarship Pathways Framework,” explored the struggles creative scholars experience when communicating their work’s value. Using semistructured interviews, Miller showed how creative researchers often conduct work involving numerous community members; however, this work is often not evaluated for its engagement. Miller formalizes a Creative Scholarship Pathways Framework to assist in evaluating such work rooted in the creative and engaged scholarship. This piece shows not only the mixing of various disciplines, but also the effects of not understanding interdisciplinary work within academia. Shin’s piece, “An interdisciplinary inquiry in the communicator: Implications of Relational Social Paradigm, Practice theory, and Biological Science,” proposes introducing a sociological approach to understanding the communicator in communication studies. Drawing specifically on relational sociology and practice/embodiment theory, Shin suggests communication should also expand in its borrowing from biological sciences. Through this analysis, Shin provides pathways for theoretical inquiries into the ontology of the communicator. Spencer and Graves’ analysis of “What communication brings to the study of gaslighting: Metatheory toward disciplinarity” argues that the interdisciplinary nature of communication provides a unique position for critique. Using the case of gaslighting, the authors argue that research in sociology, psychology, philosophy, and other disciplines will benefit from including a communication point of view. In particular, the gaslighting","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"23 1","pages":"95 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47115802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2023.2169078
Johan Bodaski
ABSTRACT An important contribution to the field of communication is François Cooren's critique of the assumption that the social and the material are entangled because this assumption reproduces the divide it claims to reject. Rather, Cooren proposes that the social and the material are properties, or (im-)properties, of one another because their relational differences bring organizations into existence. Cooren's three conclusions on this matter argue that the sociomateriality of an organization is a relational ontology. In this article, I problematize those three conclusions and suggest Maurice Merleau-Ponty's ontology of flesh as an alternative to overcome the problematics of each conclusion. Conclusion 1 lacks a conceptual groundwork explaining where social and material matter comes from, and I suggest flesh as the element to categorize matter. Conclusion 2 denigrates human existence to a matter of degree. I reframe this through the notion of alterity. Conclusion 3 suggests that relations and relata are the same yet theoretical support for that proposition is missing. As such, I offer the missing theoretical support through Merleau-Ponty's ontology of flesh. Taken together, Merleau-Ponty's ontology of flesh provides one coherent system and better affirms each of Cooren's conclusions of what a relational/communicative ontology of organization consists of.
{"title":"Sociomateriality as flesh","authors":"Johan Bodaski","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2023.2169078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2023.2169078","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT An important contribution to the field of communication is François Cooren's critique of the assumption that the social and the material are entangled because this assumption reproduces the divide it claims to reject. Rather, Cooren proposes that the social and the material are properties, or (im-)properties, of one another because their relational differences bring organizations into existence. Cooren's three conclusions on this matter argue that the sociomateriality of an organization is a relational ontology. In this article, I problematize those three conclusions and suggest Maurice Merleau-Ponty's ontology of flesh as an alternative to overcome the problematics of each conclusion. Conclusion 1 lacks a conceptual groundwork explaining where social and material matter comes from, and I suggest flesh as the element to categorize matter. Conclusion 2 denigrates human existence to a matter of degree. I reframe this through the notion of alterity. Conclusion 3 suggests that relations and relata are the same yet theoretical support for that proposition is missing. As such, I offer the missing theoretical support through Merleau-Ponty's ontology of flesh. Taken together, Merleau-Ponty's ontology of flesh provides one coherent system and better affirms each of Cooren's conclusions of what a relational/communicative ontology of organization consists of.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"23 1","pages":"150 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48855352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2022.2144426
C. Graves, Leland G. Spencer
ABSTRACT Communication scholars are uniquely positioned to engage in complex, interdisciplinary research that integrates insights from different fields alongside a key expertise in the role of human symbol use. Viewing symbolizing as one of many central elements in complex social problems, we argue that communication scholars benefit when they begin from an interdisciplinary posture in conducting their research. We take as a case study the example of gaslighting. We show how research on gaslighting from philosophy, psychology, and sociology profits from the addition of insights from the field of communication and propose directions for future research on gaslighting that incorporate communication into robust interdisciplinary projects.
{"title":"What communication brings to the study of gaslighting: metatheory toward interdisciplinarity","authors":"C. Graves, Leland G. Spencer","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2144426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2144426","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Communication scholars are uniquely positioned to engage in complex, interdisciplinary research that integrates insights from different fields alongside a key expertise in the role of human symbol use. Viewing symbolizing as one of many central elements in complex social problems, we argue that communication scholars benefit when they begin from an interdisciplinary posture in conducting their research. We take as a case study the example of gaslighting. We show how research on gaslighting from philosophy, psychology, and sociology profits from the addition of insights from the field of communication and propose directions for future research on gaslighting that incorporate communication into robust interdisciplinary projects.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"23 1","pages":"136 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47578810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-30DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2022.2147018
Michael A. Lechuga, John M. Ackerman
ABSTRACT
This small prelude to our themed issue offers some guidance for readers on how to read the essays and contributions alongside one another. Our hope is that readers will engage with this issue on their terms.
{"title":"Prelude","authors":"Michael A. Lechuga, John M. Ackerman","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2147018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2147018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>This small prelude to our themed issue offers some guidance for readers on how to read the essays and contributions alongside one another. Our hope is that readers will engage with this issue on their terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：