Pub Date : 2019-03-01DOI: 10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300366
L. Cabrera-Toledo
espanolResumen: Este articulo tiene por objetivo establecer las bases para una comprension disciplinaria y epistemologica de la geopolitica, considerando su ubicacion como campo de estudio y el principal debate entre la perspectiva clasica y critica de la misma en America del Sur. En este sentido, se efectua un abordaje historico sobre la evolucion de la geopolitica, decantando en la manera en como el conocimiento geopolitico se ha dado en la region mencionada, al tiempo que se senalan las dificultades y propuestas de investigacion en el campo senalado. Se concluye que una discusion epistemologica de la geopolitica no solamente ayudara a lograr una mejor construccion y entendimiento del conocimiento geopolitico, desde un punto de vista holistico, sino que ayudara a destacar el rol de la academia en la necesidad de ser el eje articulador de dicha discusion. EnglishAbstract: This article aims to establish the basis for a disciplinary and epistemological understanding of geopolitics, considering its location as a field of study and the main debate between the classical and critical perspective in South America. In this sense, a historical approach is made on the evolution of geopolitics, decanting in the way in which geopolitical knowledge has been given in the region while pointing out the difficulties and research proposals in the field. It concludes that an epistemological discussion of geopolitics will not only help to achieve a better construction and understanding of geopolitical knowledge, from a holistic point of view, but also highlight the role of academics to articulate the discussion.
{"title":"Una discusión disciplinaria y epistemológica de la geopolítica y su aplicación al caso suramericano","authors":"L. Cabrera-Toledo","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300366","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300366","url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: Este articulo tiene por objetivo establecer las bases para una comprension disciplinaria y epistemologica de la geopolitica, considerando su ubicacion como campo de estudio y el principal debate entre la perspectiva clasica y critica de la misma en America del Sur. En este sentido, se efectua un abordaje historico sobre la evolucion de la geopolitica, decantando en la manera en como el conocimiento geopolitico se ha dado en la region mencionada, al tiempo que se senalan las dificultades y propuestas de investigacion en el campo senalado. Se concluye que una discusion epistemologica de la geopolitica no solamente ayudara a lograr una mejor construccion y entendimiento del conocimiento geopolitico, desde un punto de vista holistico, sino que ayudara a destacar el rol de la academia en la necesidad de ser el eje articulador de dicha discusion. EnglishAbstract: This article aims to establish the basis for a disciplinary and epistemological understanding of geopolitics, considering its location as a field of study and the main debate between the classical and critical perspective in South America. In this sense, a historical approach is made on the evolution of geopolitics, decanting in the way in which geopolitical knowledge has been given in the region while pointing out the difficulties and research proposals in the field. It concludes that an epistemological discussion of geopolitics will not only help to achieve a better construction and understanding of geopolitical knowledge, from a holistic point of view, but also highlight the role of academics to articulate the discussion.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83260777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-01DOI: 10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300310
A. U. Cerón-Martínez
espanolResumen: En la formula Campo + [Capital + Habitus] = Practicas sociales, se condensan las aportaciones de un autor como Pierre Bourdieu a nivel teorico, y de ahi es posible desprender el metodo de abordaje para la investigacion social al recuperar lo objetivo y lo subjetivo de las practicas sociales. A partir de los conceptos asi formulados, se proponen dos lecciones que se desprenden del trabajo intelectual del sociologo bearnes: lecciones teoricas y algunas lecciones metodologicas derivadas de las primeras, con el fin de contribuir a una sistematizacion explicita de su modus operandi para la investigacion social, toda vez que el autor nunca lo hizo para evitar que sus aportaciones quedasen atrapadas con la rigidez de los esquemas escolasticos. En este sentido, el autor es tanto objeto como instrumento de la reflexion propuesta que mira a la nocion de capital como la metodologicamente mas importante para la practica de la investigacion social. EnglishAbstract: In the formula Field + [Capital + Habitus] = Social practices, the contributions of an author such as Pierre Bourdieu are condensed on a theoretical level, and from there it is possible to detach the approached method for social research by recovering the objective and subjective aspects of social practices based on the concepts thus formulated, two lessons are proposed that are derived from the intellectual work of the bearnese sociologist: theoretical lessons and some methodological lessons derived from the former, in order to contribute to an explicit systematization of their modus operandi for social research, since the author never did it to avoid that his contributions were trapped with the rigidity of the scholastic schemes. In this sense, the author is both an object and an instrument of the proposed reflection that looks at the notion of capital as the most important methodologically for the practice of social research.
espanolResumen提出:在资本领域+ [+ Habitus] =社会实践,封装了缴款作者皮埃尔鉴别那里teorico层面可能解开登机的方式来恢复社会调查的目标和你主观的社会实践。从概念所强调的那样,提出了两个热气的脑力劳动中吸取的教益sociologo bearnes教训:teoricas和产生的一些课metodologicas首批,以帮助sistematizacion根据社会调查的莫,鉴于提交人不会为了避免费用所作的贡献困僵硬地escolasticos模式。从这个意义上说，作者既是反思的对象，也是反思的工具，反思的目标是资本的危害，是社会研究实践中最重要的方法论。EnglishAbstract提出:In the Field + [+ Habitus] =社会资本,董事会of an提交人如皮埃尔鉴别are condensed on a理论层面,and it单人床from there to detach the method for Social research by废弃物the目标和询问主观aspects of Social practices based on the概念因此formulated, two lessons are - that are毁坏from the intellectual work of the bearnese sociologist:从前任那里得到的理论教训和一些方法论教训，以便对其社会研究工作方式的明确系统化作出贡献，因为作者从未避免他的贡献受到学术模式僵化的阻碍。从这个意义上说，作者既是对资本概念进行反思的对象，也是对社会研究实践进行反思的工具。
{"title":"Habitus, campo y capital. Lecciones teóricas y metodológicas de un sociólogo bearnés","authors":"A. U. Cerón-Martínez","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2019000300310","url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: En la formula Campo + [Capital + Habitus] = Practicas sociales, se condensan las aportaciones de un autor como Pierre Bourdieu a nivel teorico, y de ahi es posible desprender el metodo de abordaje para la investigacion social al recuperar lo objetivo y lo subjetivo de las practicas sociales. A partir de los conceptos asi formulados, se proponen dos lecciones que se desprenden del trabajo intelectual del sociologo bearnes: lecciones teoricas y algunas lecciones metodologicas derivadas de las primeras, con el fin de contribuir a una sistematizacion explicita de su modus operandi para la investigacion social, toda vez que el autor nunca lo hizo para evitar que sus aportaciones quedasen atrapadas con la rigidez de los esquemas escolasticos. En este sentido, el autor es tanto objeto como instrumento de la reflexion propuesta que mira a la nocion de capital como la metodologicamente mas importante para la practica de la investigacion social. EnglishAbstract: In the formula Field + [Capital + Habitus] = Social practices, the contributions of an author such as Pierre Bourdieu are condensed on a theoretical level, and from there it is possible to detach the approached method for social research by recovering the objective and subjective aspects of social practices based on the concepts thus formulated, two lessons are proposed that are derived from the intellectual work of the bearnese sociologist: theoretical lessons and some methodological lessons derived from the former, in order to contribute to an explicit systematization of their modus operandi for social research, since the author never did it to avoid that his contributions were trapped with the rigidity of the scholastic schemes. In this sense, the author is both an object and an instrument of the proposed reflection that looks at the notion of capital as the most important methodologically for the practice of social research.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82086741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300323
E. Céspedes
Although incommensurability between theories has been object of study during many years, there does not seem to be a clear consensus regarding the notion of meaning according to which it should be characterised. Based on the notion of incommensurability proposed here, the common ground between incommensurable theories is neither determined by the sense nor by the reference of the relevant terms, but by a given phenomenon type, which fixes the subject matter of inquiry. Phenomenon types are understood as expressions that are associated with some phenomenon and describable or understandable in some language. In this proposal, two theories can refer to a same phenomenon type even if they are mutually incommensurable about the concepts used in them to grasp it. This possibility may serve as a way of fixing the subject matter of an investigation and, thus, to characterise the common ground between incommensurable paths of inquiry, offering also a strategy to solve some remaining problems associated with realism and scientific progress.
{"title":"Incommensurability, types of phenomena and relevant incompatibility (part I)","authors":"E. Céspedes","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300323","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300323","url":null,"abstract":"Although incommensurability between theories has been object of study during many years, there does not seem to be a clear consensus regarding the notion of meaning according to which it should be characterised. Based on the notion of incommensurability proposed here, the common ground between incommensurable theories is neither determined by the sense nor by the reference of the relevant terms, but by a given phenomenon type, which fixes the subject matter of inquiry. Phenomenon types are understood as expressions that are associated with some phenomenon and describable or understandable in some language. In this proposal, two theories can refer to a same phenomenon type even if they are mutually incommensurable about the concepts used in them to grasp it. This possibility may serve as a way of fixing the subject matter of an investigation and, thus, to characterise the common ground between incommensurable paths of inquiry, offering also a strategy to solve some remaining problems associated with realism and scientific progress.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86274909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300283
Raúl Fernando Linares
espanolResumen: En el presente articulo se propone una revision de caracter descriptivo respecto a distintos momentos en los que el llamado giro semiotico de las ciencias sociales colinda con algunas categorias epistemicas fundamentales para la construccion de un proceso consciente de acercamiento a lo social. Asi, la realidad como constructo discursivo, el caracter semiotico-perceptual de la observacion, los procesos de transcodificacion entre doxa y episteme o el peso estructural de la disciplina, seran los ejes fundamentales planteados para esta relacion. A partir de este planteamiento, se proponen como criterios de integracion semiotico-epistemica dos paradigmas claves en la construccion de un proceso de investigacion cualitativa: la adopcion de estructuras interdisciplinarias y el enfoque de la complejidad, que permiten problematizar las categorias anteriores, integrandolas como elementos fundamentales en la organizacion social del sentido. EnglishAbstract: The present article proposes a descriptive review of those moments in which the social sciences semiotic turn borders with some epistemic categories that results fundamental for the construction of a conscious approach to the social. Thus, the reality as a discursive construct, the semiotic character of observation, the transcoding process between doxa and episteme, or the structural wealth of discipline will be presented as fundamental axes to this relationship. Based on this approach, there are proposed as semiotic-epistemic integration judgements, two fundamental keys in the construction of a qualitative research process: the adoption of interdisciplinary structures, and the complexity perspective that allows to problematize the previous categories, integrating them as fundamental elements in the social meaning organization.
摘要:本文提出了一种描述性的回顾，在这种回顾中，社会科学的符文转向与一些基本的认识论范畴相对应，这些认识论范畴是构建社会方法的有意识过程的基础。因此，现实作为一种话语建构，观察的符符-知觉特征，doxa和认识论之间的转换过程，或学科的结构权重，将是这种关系的基本轴。从这个方针,建议作为标准integracion semiotico-epistemica两个模式在肯尼亚的一个质的调查进程的关键:结构的跨学科方法及复杂性,据此可辩驳categorias先前integrandolas社会组织作为基本元素。英语stract:本文对社会科学符号学与某些认识论范畴之间的界限进行了描述性回顾，这些认识论范畴是构建社会意识方法的基础。因此，现实作为一种话语建构、观察的符号学特征、doxa与认识论之间的转换过程或学科的结构财富将作为这种关系的基本轴心呈现出来。- Based on this approach,《there are as semiotic-epistemic integration判决,two keys in the construction of a定性研究的基本过程:通过跨学科聘用,and the complexity perspective that allows to problematize the previous categories, integrating察as elements in the社会意义组织基础。
{"title":"Realidad y significación. El giro semiótico como perspectiva y propuesta de ponderación epistémica","authors":"Raúl Fernando Linares","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300283","url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: En el presente articulo se propone una revision de caracter descriptivo respecto a distintos momentos en los que el llamado giro semiotico de las ciencias sociales colinda con algunas categorias epistemicas fundamentales para la construccion de un proceso consciente de acercamiento a lo social. Asi, la realidad como constructo discursivo, el caracter semiotico-perceptual de la observacion, los procesos de transcodificacion entre doxa y episteme o el peso estructural de la disciplina, seran los ejes fundamentales planteados para esta relacion. A partir de este planteamiento, se proponen como criterios de integracion semiotico-epistemica dos paradigmas claves en la construccion de un proceso de investigacion cualitativa: la adopcion de estructuras interdisciplinarias y el enfoque de la complejidad, que permiten problematizar las categorias anteriores, integrandolas como elementos fundamentales en la organizacion social del sentido. EnglishAbstract: The present article proposes a descriptive review of those moments in which the social sciences semiotic turn borders with some epistemic categories that results fundamental for the construction of a conscious approach to the social. Thus, the reality as a discursive construct, the semiotic character of observation, the transcoding process between doxa and episteme, or the structural wealth of discipline will be presented as fundamental axes to this relationship. Based on this approach, there are proposed as semiotic-epistemic integration judgements, two fundamental keys in the construction of a qualitative research process: the adoption of interdisciplinary structures, and the complexity perspective that allows to problematize the previous categories, integrating them as fundamental elements in the social meaning organization.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72670392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.4067/s0717-554x2018000300357
Sandra Villanueva-Gallardo
espanolResumen: Los territorios discursivos se erigen mediante la conformacion de dos dimensiones, una que atiende a sus componentes discursivos y la otra que responde a las caracteristicas territoriales donde todo lo develado por medio del discurso se constituye en un holograma territorial-identitario. Esto significa que nos encontramos frente a un tipo de territorio tradicionalmente invisibilizado, en gran parte, por la subalternizacion de los discursos y la no consideracion recursiva de los territorios. Por tanto, esta investigacion pretende dar cuenta de los componentes que hacen de los territorios discursivos una realidad territorial con sentidos reconocibles, tanto en sus aspectos simbolicos como materiales, desde un origen epistemologico que atiende a la naturaleza del fenomeno. EnglishAbstract: Discursive territories are created through the conformation of two dimensions, one that attends to its discursive components and the other that responds to the territorial characteristics where everything unveiled through discourse is constituted in a territorial-identity hologram. This means that we are facing a type of territory traditionally rendered invisible, in large part, by the subalternization of discourses and the recusal of territories. Therefore, this research aims to account for the components that make discursive territories a territorial reality with recognizable meanings, both in its symbolic and material aspects, from an epistemological origin that attends to the nature of the phenomenon.
{"title":"Fundamentos metodológicos de los territorios discursivos","authors":"Sandra Villanueva-Gallardo","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2018000300357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2018000300357","url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: Los territorios discursivos se erigen mediante la conformacion de dos dimensiones, una que atiende a sus componentes discursivos y la otra que responde a las caracteristicas territoriales donde todo lo develado por medio del discurso se constituye en un holograma territorial-identitario. Esto significa que nos encontramos frente a un tipo de territorio tradicionalmente invisibilizado, en gran parte, por la subalternizacion de los discursos y la no consideracion recursiva de los territorios. Por tanto, esta investigacion pretende dar cuenta de los componentes que hacen de los territorios discursivos una realidad territorial con sentidos reconocibles, tanto en sus aspectos simbolicos como materiales, desde un origen epistemologico que atiende a la naturaleza del fenomeno. EnglishAbstract: Discursive territories are created through the conformation of two dimensions, one that attends to its discursive components and the other that responds to the territorial characteristics where everything unveiled through discourse is constituted in a territorial-identity hologram. This means that we are facing a type of territory traditionally rendered invisible, in large part, by the subalternization of discourses and the recusal of territories. Therefore, this research aims to account for the components that make discursive territories a territorial reality with recognizable meanings, both in its symbolic and material aspects, from an epistemological origin that attends to the nature of the phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80822672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300274
Rosario Rogel-Salazar
{"title":"El grupo de discusión: revisión de premisas metodológicas","authors":"Rosario Rogel-Salazar","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300274","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85959507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300297
Sergio Pignuoli-Ocampo
This text reconstructs the general criticism to conflation formulated by Margaret Archer. In its social morphogenesis programme, Archer elaborates an acute diagnosis about the main deficits of different constructions of sociological object and she questioned them ontological and epistemologically through the figure of conflation, in which she distinguished three modes (downwards, upwards and central). Here we reconstruct each of them separately and we analyse the formulation in nuce the theoretical basis of critical and morphogenetic realism, a scientific research programme that she establishes as a nonconflation sociological way, supported by critical realism and analytical dualism. In doing so, we assume the systematic perspective of multileveled research programmes and the category of metatheorizing as
{"title":"De la crítica a la sociología conflacionista al realismo crítico morfogenético en Margaret Archer","authors":"Sergio Pignuoli-Ocampo","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300297","url":null,"abstract":"This text reconstructs the general criticism to conflation formulated by Margaret Archer. In its social morphogenesis programme, Archer elaborates an acute diagnosis about the main deficits of different constructions of sociological object and she questioned them ontological and epistemologically through the figure of conflation, in which she distinguished three modes (downwards, upwards and central). Here we reconstruct each of them separately and we analyse the formulation in nuce the theoretical basis of critical and morphogenetic realism, a scientific research programme that she establishes as a nonconflation sociological way, supported by critical realism and analytical dualism. In doing so, we assume the systematic perspective of multileveled research programmes and the category of metatheorizing as","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88567742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.4067/s0717-554x2018000300314
Mónica Humeres
{"title":"Crítica a las genealogías reales e imaginarias","authors":"Mónica Humeres","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2018000300314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2018000300314","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75497997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300331
Vanessa Jara-Labarthé
{"title":"Discursos y prácticas de la discriminación positiva para políticas indígenas en educación superior","authors":"Vanessa Jara-Labarthé","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300331","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79629379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-01DOI: 10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300365
Rossana Cassigoli
This paper identifies epistemological principles that would come to define the task of anthropological research. These principles are theoretical assumptions which would inform the practice of a discipline based on a method of qualitative observation, and on the systematic recording of the things observed with a markedly subjective tone. In this study, I offer a proposal on the ethical stance implicit in the acknowledgement and explicitation of the locus of research, which would in turn underpin the articulation of an explanatory discourse that is demonstrative in nature. A hypothetical researcher would be aware of the multi-dimensional and subjective representation of the phenomenon observed and shun immediatist or prescriptive interpretations. In the conceptual framework offered by Bourdieu, interpretation in this case would entail a modus operandi as a practical expression and “common sense” as a cultural manifestation. What is proposed here is a meditative observation that would result in the co-involvement of the anthropological subject in that which the anthropologist seeks to explain.
{"title":"Epistemología y aforismos. Usos de la antropología contemporánea","authors":"Rossana Cassigoli","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2018000300365","url":null,"abstract":"This paper identifies epistemological principles that would come to define the task of anthropological research. These principles are theoretical assumptions which would inform the practice of a discipline based on a method of qualitative observation, and on the systematic recording of the things observed with a markedly subjective tone. In this study, I offer a proposal on the ethical stance implicit in the acknowledgement and explicitation of the locus of research, which would in turn underpin the articulation of an explanatory discourse that is demonstrative in nature. A hypothetical researcher would be aware of the multi-dimensional and subjective representation of the phenomenon observed and shun immediatist or prescriptive interpretations. In the conceptual framework offered by Bourdieu, interpretation in this case would entail a modus operandi as a practical expression and “common sense” as a cultural manifestation. What is proposed here is a meditative observation that would result in the co-involvement of the anthropological subject in that which the anthropologist seeks to explain.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75249192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：