首页 > 最新文献

Trauma Violence & Abuse最新文献

英文 中文
Prevalence of Victimization Among Adults with Severe Mental Illness Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 世界范围内成人严重精神疾病患者的受害患病率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 6.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251386799
Isabella Carvalho Oliveira Rocha,Alexandre Martins Valença,Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho,Pedro Barcelos Banhara,William Berger
Individuals with severe mental illnesses (SMI), a highly vulnerable but understudied portion of the population, may be more susceptible to victimization. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of victimization and its correlates among SMI individuals. For that, we systematically reviewed data from PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycNet, and Scielo, including studies that assessed the prevalence of different types of victimization among adults with a broad spectrum of SMI, males and females, in clinical samples. Thirty full-text articles were included. Methodological quality was evaluated. Statistical analyses were used to estimate pooled prevalence of victimization for different periods, and random-effects model was used. Possible sources of heterogeneity were evaluated through subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Findings showed a lack of standardization in the methodology for assessing victimization. Overall analysis indicated high victimization rates among SMI individuals, even with great heterogeneity among them. The pooled prevalence of victimization over a period of up to 12 months was 33.3%. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were found as important correlates to victimization. These data can be used to identify the SMI individuals at higher risk of violence and to implement targeted health policies to prevent victimization in this population.
患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体,是一个高度脆弱但未被充分研究的人群,可能更容易成为受害者。我们的目的是调查在重度精神病人中受害的普遍程度及其相关因素。为此,我们系统地回顾了PubMed (Medline)、Web of Science、Scopus、APA psynet和Scielo的数据,包括在临床样本中评估不同类型的受害者在广泛的SMI成年人(男性和女性)中的患病率的研究。收录了30篇全文文章。评估方法学质量。采用统计分析方法估计不同时期的受害总发生率,并采用随机效应模型。通过亚组分析和元回归评估可能的异质性来源。调查结果显示,评估受害情况的方法缺乏标准化。总体分析表明,重度精神障碍个体的受害率很高,即使他们之间存在很大的异质性。在长达12个月的时间里,受害的总发生率为33.3%。社会人口学和临床因素被发现是受害的重要相关因素。这些数据可用于确定暴力风险较高的重度精神分裂症患者,并实施有针对性的卫生政策,以防止这一人群受害。
{"title":"Prevalence of Victimization Among Adults with Severe Mental Illness Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Isabella Carvalho Oliveira Rocha,Alexandre Martins Valença,Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho,Pedro Barcelos Banhara,William Berger","doi":"10.1177/15248380251386799","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251386799","url":null,"abstract":"Individuals with severe mental illnesses (SMI), a highly vulnerable but understudied portion of the population, may be more susceptible to victimization. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of victimization and its correlates among SMI individuals. For that, we systematically reviewed data from PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycNet, and Scielo, including studies that assessed the prevalence of different types of victimization among adults with a broad spectrum of SMI, males and females, in clinical samples. Thirty full-text articles were included. Methodological quality was evaluated. Statistical analyses were used to estimate pooled prevalence of victimization for different periods, and random-effects model was used. Possible sources of heterogeneity were evaluated through subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Findings showed a lack of standardization in the methodology for assessing victimization. Overall analysis indicated high victimization rates among SMI individuals, even with great heterogeneity among them. The pooled prevalence of victimization over a period of up to 12 months was 33.3%. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were found as important correlates to victimization. These data can be used to identify the SMI individuals at higher risk of violence and to implement targeted health policies to prevent victimization in this population.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"1 1","pages":"15248380251386799"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145491634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum to “Hard-To-Reach” Voices: Methodology of Qualitative Research on Violence Against Women With Disabilities—A Systematic Review “难以触及”的声音的勘误:对残疾妇女暴力的定性研究方法-系统回顾
IF 6.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251397679
{"title":"Erratum to “Hard-To-Reach” Voices: Methodology of Qualitative Research on Violence Against Women With Disabilities—A Systematic Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/15248380251397679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251397679","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145478296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When Only Death Can Save Me! Understanding Suicidality in Women Victims of IPV Admitted to Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review. 只有死亡才能拯救我!了解急诊科收治的IPV女性受害者的自杀倾向:一项范围审查
IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251372151
Paola Torrioni, Agata Benfante, Federica Bullaro, Manuela Cangelosi, Georgia Zara

The scientific literature unanimously assumes that intimate partner violence (IPV) increases the vulnerability of victims to such an extent that the link between this type of violence and suicide appears to be particularly critical. The aim of this scoping review was to summarize the scientific evidence on the prevalence of suicide-suicidal ideation, attempts, and completions-in women who were victims of IPV admitted to emergency departments (EDs) due to suicide attempts. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Review. The PubMed, Ebsco, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched using a string of Boolean operators that combined multiple synonyms of IPV, suicide, and EDs. The inclusion criteria were: adult women who were victims of IPV; being admitted to the ED for suicide attempts, and/or died by suicide; with or without a comparison group; and quantitative studies with all types of study design. The review included 22 studies from 1995 to 2023. All studies emphasized the extent to which a history of IPV particularly affects the psychological well-being of victims, limiting their sense of agency and impoverishing their identity and self-esteem, so that suicide was often seen as a way out of what had already occurred for many victims: a sense of psychological disintegration. A further urgency is to prevent the persistence of IPV, as this means preventing women from suicidal thoughts and attempts.

科学文献一致认为,亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)增加了受害者的脆弱性,以至于这种类型的暴力与自杀之间的联系似乎特别重要。本综述的目的是总结因自杀企图而被急诊科收治的女性IPV受害者中自杀流行率(自杀意念、自杀企图和自杀完成)的科学证据。按照系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的荟萃分析进行评价。PubMed、Ebsco和Web of Science数据库使用一串布尔运算符进行系统搜索,该运算符组合了IPV、自杀和ed的多个同义词。纳入标准为:IPV受害者的成年妇女;因企图自杀而入院及/或自杀身亡;有或没有对照组的;以及各种研究设计的定量研究。该综述包括1995年至2023年的22项研究。所有的研究都强调了IPV的历史在多大程度上特别影响了受害者的心理健康,限制了他们的能动性,削弱了他们的身份和自尊,因此自杀往往被视为摆脱许多受害者已经发生的事情的一种方式:心理解体感。另一个紧迫问题是防止IPV持续存在,因为这意味着防止妇女产生自杀念头和企图。
{"title":"When Only Death Can Save Me! Understanding Suicidality in Women Victims of IPV Admitted to Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Paola Torrioni, Agata Benfante, Federica Bullaro, Manuela Cangelosi, Georgia Zara","doi":"10.1177/15248380251372151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251372151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scientific literature unanimously assumes that intimate partner violence (IPV) increases the vulnerability of victims to such an extent that the link between this type of violence and suicide appears to be particularly critical. The aim of this scoping review was to summarize the scientific evidence on the prevalence of suicide-suicidal ideation, attempts, and completions-in women who were victims of IPV admitted to emergency departments (EDs) due to suicide attempts. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Review. The PubMed, Ebsco, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched using a string of Boolean operators that combined multiple synonyms of IPV, suicide, and EDs. The inclusion criteria were: adult women who were victims of IPV; being admitted to the ED for suicide attempts, and/or died by suicide; with or without a comparison group; and quantitative studies with all types of study design. The review included 22 studies from 1995 to 2023. All studies emphasized the extent to which a history of IPV particularly affects the psychological well-being of victims, limiting their sense of agency and impoverishing their identity and self-esteem, so that suicide was often seen as a way out of what had already occurred for many victims: a sense of psychological disintegration. A further urgency is to prevent the persistence of IPV, as this means preventing women from suicidal thoughts and attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380251372151"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State and Non-State Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Against Women and Girls During the Northern Irish 'Troubles': A Systematic Review. 北爱尔兰“麻烦”期间与国家和非国家冲突有关的针对妇女和女童的性暴力:系统回顾。
IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251366267
Orla Kerrigan, Conor Murray, Jennifer Ferguson

In the international context, there is a prevailing perception that conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) did not occur during the ethno-nationalist conflict in Northern Ireland (NI), commonly referred to as the 'Troubles.' This systematic review shows that CRSV did occur and was widespread and systemic. The review focused on women and girls of all ages in NI during the Troubles. It excluded CRSV outside NI. We searched PyschInfo, EMBASE, and APA Physcarticles (via OVID); PUBMED, CINAHL Ultimate, Criminal justice abstracts, Medline, peace research abstracts, and women's study international (via EBSCOHost); the ProQuest social sciences premium collection (25 databases including the National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts); the Cochrane Library; Scopus; Web of Science; the first 10 pages of Google Scholar; and specialist websites (notably of Amnesty International, the UK Ministry of Justice, the NI Department of Justice, and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights [OHCHR]). Of 4,061 database results, 300 Google Scholar results, and 5,187 'reference list checking' searches, 47 publications met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen publications were identified through database searches, 8 publications through Google Scholar, and 25 publications through reference searches. The publications illuminate the experiences of women and girls in NI who suffered conflict-related sexual, physical, verbal, and psychological harassment, perpetrated by state or non-state actors, in community or criminal justice settings. Available accounts and testimonies show that violence was pervasive, widespread, and created intense fear and vulnerability.

在国际背景下,人们普遍认为,在北爱尔兰(NI)的民族主义冲突(通常被称为“麻烦”)期间,没有发生与冲突有关的性暴力(CRSV)。本系统综述表明,CRSV确实发生过,而且是广泛和系统性的。这次审查的重点是北爱尔兰问题期间所有年龄段的妇女和女孩。它排除了NI以外的CRSV。我们检索了PyschInfo、EMBASE和APA physics(通过OVID);PUBMED, CINAHL Ultimate,刑事司法摘要,Medline,和平研究摘要和国际妇女研究(通过EBSCOHost);ProQuest社会科学精选集(包括国家刑事司法参考服务摘要在内的25个数据库);科克伦图书馆;斯高帕斯;Web of Science;b谷歌Scholar的前10页;以及专业网站(特别是大赦国际、英国司法部、爱尔兰司法部和联合国人权事务高级专员办事处[人权高专办])。在4,061个数据库结果、300谷歌个Scholar结果和5,187个“参考文献列表检查”搜索中,47个出版物符合纳入标准。通过数据库检索确定了14篇论文,通过谷歌Scholar检索确定了8篇论文,通过参考文献检索确定了25篇论文。这些出版物阐明了NI妇女和女孩在社区或刑事司法环境中遭受与冲突有关的性、身体、语言和心理骚扰的经历,这些骚扰来自国家或非国家行为体。现有的叙述和证词表明,暴力无处不在、广泛存在,并造成了强烈的恐惧和脆弱性。
{"title":"State and Non-State Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Against Women and Girls During the Northern Irish 'Troubles': A Systematic Review.","authors":"Orla Kerrigan, Conor Murray, Jennifer Ferguson","doi":"10.1177/15248380251366267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251366267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the international context, there is a prevailing perception that conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) did not occur during the ethno-nationalist conflict in Northern Ireland (NI), commonly referred to as the 'Troubles.' This systematic review shows that CRSV did occur and was widespread and systemic. The review focused on women and girls of all ages in NI during the Troubles. It excluded CRSV outside NI. We searched PyschInfo, EMBASE, and APA Physcarticles (via OVID); PUBMED, CINAHL Ultimate, Criminal justice abstracts, Medline, peace research abstracts, and women's study international (via EBSCOHost); the ProQuest social sciences premium collection (25 databases including the National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts); the Cochrane Library; Scopus; Web of Science; the first 10 pages of Google Scholar; and specialist websites (notably of Amnesty International, the UK Ministry of Justice, the NI Department of Justice, and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights [OHCHR]). Of 4,061 database results, 300 Google Scholar results, and 5,187 'reference list checking' searches, 47 publications met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen publications were identified through database searches, 8 publications through Google Scholar, and 25 publications through reference searches. The publications illuminate the experiences of women and girls in NI who suffered conflict-related sexual, physical, verbal, and psychological harassment, perpetrated by state or non-state actors, in community or criminal justice settings. Available accounts and testimonies show that violence was pervasive, widespread, and created intense fear and vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380251366267"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peer Victimization and Problematic Internet Use Among Adolescents: A Three-Level Meta-Analytic Review 青少年同伴受害与问题网络使用:三层次元分析回顾
IF 6.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251383917
Jun Li, Wenqing Li, Xiaoyu Li, Yinqiu Zhao, Chi Yang
Theoretical and empirical evidence have suggested that peer victimization is associated with adolescent problematic Internet use. However, the relationship between peer victimization and adolescent problematic Internet use remains inconsistently interpreted, with empirical findings showing varying correlations. This meta-analytic review thus aimed to examine the overall association between peer victimization and adolescent problematic Internet use, and to further explore the moderators that influence this association. Following a search of seven databases (Web of Science, PubMed, PsycArticles, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, ERIC, and CNKI) and auxiliary searches, data from 55 studies ( N = 249,892 adolescents) yielding 114 effect sizes were synthesized using advanced three-level meta-analytic models in R. The meta-analysis revealed that peer victimization was significantly and positively related to adolescent problematic Internet use ( r = .237, p < .001), representing a small effect size. This relationship, however, was moderated by several key factors. Specifically, publication year, data type, and measures of both peer victimization and problematic Internet use emerged as significant moderators, while culture showed a marginally significant moderating effect. In contrast, no significant moderation was found for sex, age, publication status, or the type of problematic Internet use. These results were not affected by publication bias. The findings provide a more comprehensive insight into the link between peer victimization and adolescent problematic Internet use, highlighting that interventions addressing adolescent problematic Internet use should be aware of the potential impact stemming from peer victimization experiences.
理论和经验证据表明,同伴受害与青少年有问题的互联网使用有关。然而,同伴受害与青少年有问题的互联网使用之间的关系仍然没有得到一致的解释,实证研究结果显示出不同的相关性。因此,本荟萃分析综述旨在检验同伴受害与青少年有问题的互联网使用之间的整体联系,并进一步探索影响这种联系的调节因子。通过对7个数据库(Web of Science、PubMed、PsycArticles、PsycINFO、MEDLINE、ERIC和CNKI)的检索和辅助检索,我们利用先进的三层元分析模型综合了55项研究(N = 249,892名青少年)的数据,产生了114个效应量。元分析显示同伴受害与青少年有问题的互联网使用显著正相关(r = 0.237, p < .001),代表了一个小的效应量。然而,这种关系受到几个关键因素的缓和。具体来说,出版年份、数据类型、同伴受害和有问题的互联网使用的测量都是显著的调节因素,而文化表现出轻微的显著调节作用。相比之下,性别、年龄、出版状况或有问题的互联网使用类型没有明显的缓和。这些结果不受发表偏倚的影响。研究结果为同伴受害与青少年有问题的互联网使用之间的联系提供了更全面的见解,强调针对青少年有问题的互联网使用的干预措施应该意识到同伴受害经历的潜在影响。
{"title":"Peer Victimization and Problematic Internet Use Among Adolescents: A Three-Level Meta-Analytic Review","authors":"Jun Li, Wenqing Li, Xiaoyu Li, Yinqiu Zhao, Chi Yang","doi":"10.1177/15248380251383917","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251383917","url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical and empirical evidence have suggested that peer victimization is associated with adolescent problematic Internet use. However, the relationship between peer victimization and adolescent problematic Internet use remains inconsistently interpreted, with empirical findings showing varying correlations. This meta-analytic review thus aimed to examine the overall association between peer victimization and adolescent problematic Internet use, and to further explore the moderators that influence this association. Following a search of seven databases (Web of Science, PubMed, PsycArticles, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, ERIC, and CNKI) and auxiliary searches, data from 55 studies ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N</jats:italic> = 249,892 adolescents) yielding 114 effect sizes were synthesized using advanced three-level meta-analytic models in R. The meta-analysis revealed that peer victimization was significantly and positively related to adolescent problematic Internet use ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">r</jats:italic> = .237, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> &lt; .001), representing a small effect size. This relationship, however, was moderated by several key factors. Specifically, publication year, data type, and measures of both peer victimization and problematic Internet use emerged as significant moderators, while culture showed a marginally significant moderating effect. In contrast, no significant moderation was found for sex, age, publication status, or the type of problematic Internet use. These results were not affected by publication bias. The findings provide a more comprehensive insight into the link between peer victimization and adolescent problematic Internet use, highlighting that interventions addressing adolescent problematic Internet use should be aware of the potential impact stemming from peer victimization experiences.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse and Neglect in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 低收入和中等收入国家强制报告儿童虐待和忽视的障碍和促进因素的混合方法系统综述
IF 6.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251381817
Kewen Wang, Jiayin Yuan, Clifton R. Emery
Mandatory reporting (MR) of child abuse and neglect is a crucial policy in child protection systems globally, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review explores facilitators and barriers to MR in LMICs, addressing a gap in existing literature that largely focuses on high-income settings. A comprehensive search of 7 databases yielded 50 studies (30 quantitative, 18 qualitative, and 2 mixed-methods) from 21 LMICs, representing 13,079 participants from various professional backgrounds. Adopting a convergent thematic synthesis methodology and the mixed-methods appraisal tool to assess the study quality, the review mapped 35 barriers and 19 facilitators under 6 themes: case characteristics, reporters’ individual characteristics, interpersonal, institutional, structural/community-level factors, and cultural factors. While reporters’ characteristics were predominantly evaluated, such as their varied priorities over competing and sometimes conflicted interests as a prominent barrier, systemic barriers were also salient across LMICs, such as insufficient mechanisms, poor inter-agency collaboration, tension between formal reporting and traditional informal settlements, and cultural beliefs about parental rights and physical discipline. Nonetheless, this review also suggested critical directions for action—via type- and context-specific policy adaptations, evidence-based training, developing reporting protocols, and enhancing multi-stakeholder collaboration for community and cultural change. The findings overall reflect an ecological model, particularly the decision-making ecology framework, emphasizing the interplay between case, individual, organizational, and external factors, with barriers outweighing facilitators. The review highlights potential areas for strategic investment and future research to improve the efficacy of MR policies in LMICs.
强制报告虐待和忽视儿童行为是全球儿童保护体系的一项关键政策,包括在低收入和中等收入国家。本系统综述探讨了中低收入国家MR的促进因素和障碍,解决了现有文献中主要关注高收入环境的空白。综合检索了7个数据库,得到了来自21个低收入国家的50项研究(30项定量研究,18项定性研究,2项混合方法研究),代表了来自不同专业背景的13079名参与者。采用融合主题综合方法和混合方法评估工具来评估研究质量,综述在6个主题下绘制了35个障碍和19个促进因素:案例特征、记者个人特征、人际、制度、结构/社区层面因素和文化因素。虽然主要评估了记者的特征,例如他们对竞争和有时冲突的利益的不同优先事项作为一个突出的障碍,但在中低收入国家中,系统性障碍也很突出,例如机制不足,机构间合作不良,正式报道与传统非正式解决方案之间的紧张关系,以及关于父母权利和体罚的文化信仰。尽管如此,该审查还提出了关键的行动方向,包括针对具体类型和具体情况的政策调整、基于证据的培训、制定报告协议以及加强社区和文化变革的多利益攸关方合作。研究结果总体上反映了一个生态模型,特别是决策生态框架,强调案例、个人、组织和外部因素之间的相互作用,障碍大于促进因素。该综述强调了战略投资和未来研究的潜在领域,以提高中低收入国家MR政策的效力。
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse and Neglect in Low- and Middle-Income Countries","authors":"Kewen Wang, Jiayin Yuan, Clifton R. Emery","doi":"10.1177/15248380251381817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251381817","url":null,"abstract":"Mandatory reporting (MR) of child abuse and neglect is a crucial policy in child protection systems globally, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review explores facilitators and barriers to MR in LMICs, addressing a gap in existing literature that largely focuses on high-income settings. A comprehensive search of 7 databases yielded 50 studies (30 quantitative, 18 qualitative, and 2 mixed-methods) from 21 LMICs, representing 13,079 participants from various professional backgrounds. Adopting a convergent thematic synthesis methodology and the mixed-methods appraisal tool to assess the study quality, the review mapped 35 barriers and 19 facilitators under 6 themes: case characteristics, reporters’ individual characteristics, interpersonal, institutional, structural/community-level factors, and cultural factors. While reporters’ characteristics were predominantly evaluated, such as their varied priorities over competing and sometimes conflicted interests as a prominent barrier, systemic barriers were also salient across LMICs, such as insufficient mechanisms, poor inter-agency collaboration, tension between formal reporting and traditional informal settlements, and cultural beliefs about parental rights and physical discipline. Nonetheless, this review also suggested critical directions for action—via type- and context-specific policy adaptations, evidence-based training, developing reporting protocols, and enhancing multi-stakeholder collaboration for community and cultural change. The findings overall reflect an ecological model, particularly the decision-making ecology framework, emphasizing the interplay between case, individual, organizational, and external factors, with barriers outweighing facilitators. The review highlights potential areas for strategic investment and future research to improve the efficacy of MR policies in LMICs.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Weight of Intersecting Identities: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Literature on Community and Systemic-Level Gender-Based Violence Against Visible Minority Women 交叉身份的权重:对社区和系统层面针对少数族裔女性的性别暴力文献的混合方法系统回顾
IF 6.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251381871
Nashit Chowdhury, Didem Erman, Zack Marshall, Mohammad M. H. Raihan, Ranjan Datta, Fariba Aghajafari, Janki Shankar, Kamal Sehgal, Ruksana Rashid, Tanvir C. Turin
Gender-based violence (GBV) affects one in three women globally, with visible minority women being at a higher risk due to the intersection of sexism, racism, and xenophobia. Community-level GBV is a form of interpersonal violence that occurs in public spaces and is enacted by strangers, while systemic-level GBV is linked to institutional and public policies and reflected in inequalities in employment, access to resources, and exploitation. This review examined community and systemic-level GBV against visible minority women, applying an intersectional lens. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of academic and gray literature from the last 20 years, following Joanna Briggs Institute’s guidelines. The review focused on community and systemic-level GBV against visible minority women in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. Our systematic search found 8,970 potentially relevant studies after duplicate removal. Following a two-stage screening process, we identified 35 articles that reported on community and systemic-level GBV. We extracted and integrated data from eligible quantitative and qualitative studies, then thematically synthesized the findings using Thomas and Harden’s approach. Findings demonstrate that visible minority women’s GBV experiences are multifaceted and compounded by intersectional identities. Visible minority women with precarious migration and employment status face particular vulnerability. Barriers based on language, culture, and financial background also add to the difficulties. The intersection of gender, race, and other identities produces severe physical and psychological consequences and the propagation of race and gender-based discriminatory practices.
基于性别的暴力影响着全球三分之一的女性,由于性别歧视、种族主义和仇外心理的交叉作用,少数族裔女性面临更高的风险。社区层面的性别暴力是一种发生在公共空间的人际暴力,由陌生人实施,而系统层面的性别暴力与制度和公共政策有关,反映在就业、获取资源和剥削方面的不平等。本综述采用交叉视角,研究了社区和系统层面针对可见少数族裔妇女的GBV。我们按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指导方针,对过去20年的学术文献和灰色文献进行了混合方法的系统回顾。审查的重点是加拿大、美国、英国、澳大利亚和新西兰针对少数族裔妇女的社区和系统层面的性别暴力。我们的系统搜索在删除重复后发现了8,970个可能相关的研究。经过两个阶段的筛选过程,我们确定了35篇报道社区和系统层面的性别暴力的文章。我们从合格的定量和定性研究中提取和整合数据,然后使用Thomas和Harden的方法对研究结果进行主题综合。研究结果表明,少数族裔女性的性别暴力经历是多方面的,并因交叉身份而复杂化。移民和就业状况不稳定的少数族裔妇女尤其容易受到伤害。基于语言、文化和经济背景的障碍也增加了困难。性别、种族和其他身份的交叉产生了严重的生理和心理后果,并助长了基于种族和性别的歧视行为。
{"title":"The Weight of Intersecting Identities: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Literature on Community and Systemic-Level Gender-Based Violence Against Visible Minority Women","authors":"Nashit Chowdhury, Didem Erman, Zack Marshall, Mohammad M. H. Raihan, Ranjan Datta, Fariba Aghajafari, Janki Shankar, Kamal Sehgal, Ruksana Rashid, Tanvir C. Turin","doi":"10.1177/15248380251381871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251381871","url":null,"abstract":"Gender-based violence (GBV) affects one in three women globally, with visible minority women being at a higher risk due to the intersection of sexism, racism, and xenophobia. Community-level GBV is a form of interpersonal violence that occurs in public spaces and is enacted by strangers, while systemic-level GBV is linked to institutional and public policies and reflected in inequalities in employment, access to resources, and exploitation. This review examined community and systemic-level GBV against visible minority women, applying an intersectional lens. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of academic and gray literature from the last 20 years, following Joanna Briggs Institute’s guidelines. The review focused on community and systemic-level GBV against visible minority women in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. Our systematic search found 8,970 potentially relevant studies after duplicate removal. Following a two-stage screening process, we identified 35 articles that reported on community and systemic-level GBV. We extracted and integrated data from eligible quantitative and qualitative studies, then thematically synthesized the findings using Thomas and Harden’s approach. Findings demonstrate that visible minority women’s GBV experiences are multifaceted and compounded by intersectional identities. Visible minority women with precarious migration and employment status face particular vulnerability. Barriers based on language, culture, and financial background also add to the difficulties. The intersection of gender, race, and other identities produces severe physical and psychological consequences and the propagation of race and gender-based discriminatory practices.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and Correlates of the Family Polyvictimization: An Updated Meta-Analysis. 家庭多重受害的患病率及其相关因素:一项更新的元分析。
IF 6.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251383939
Ko Ling Chan,Qiqi Chen
This study aims to (a) provide updated prevalence estimates of family polyvictimization by synthesizing recent literature, (b) examine the effect sizes of how one type of family victimization impacts other types, and (c) investigate correlates of family polyvictimization. Literature databases were searched for publications from May 2018 onward. A total of 49 studies, producing 51 estimates, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this updated analysis, providing a substantial sample size of 543,196 for the general synthesis of effect sizes. Combined with a previous meta-analysis, 89 estimates were included to synthesize overall effect sizes and estimate associations among different types of family victimization and their correlates. Among the 51 new estimates, the event rate of family polyvictimization was 27.0%. When combined with the previous meta-analysis (18.3%), the overall event rate across 89 estimates decreases slightly to 23.1%. This updated meta-analysis includes more studies from continents such as Africa and South America, which consistently report higher rates of polyvictimization. Findings also show that the prevalence of family victimization co-occurrence is higher in clinical samples compared to the general population. The higher prevalence of family victimization co-occurrence in clinical samples highlights the increased likelihood of identifying a second victim in the same family once the first victim comes to the attention of health or social services. The overrepresentation of child polyvictimization and the co-occurrence of intimate partner violence and child abuse suggest that more members from extended families should be included in family violence studies.
本研究旨在(a)通过综合最近的文献提供家庭多重受害的最新流行估计,(b)检查一种类型的家庭受害如何影响其他类型的效应大小,以及(c)调查家庭多重受害的相关关系。检索了2018年5月以后的文献数据库。共有49项研究,产生了51项估计,符合纳入标准,并纳入了这次更新的分析,为效应大小的一般综合提供了543,196个大量样本量。结合先前的荟萃分析,包括89个估计来综合总体效应大小,并估计不同类型的家庭受害及其相关因素之间的关联。在51项新的估计中,家庭多重受害的发生率为27.0%。当与之前的荟萃分析(18.3%)相结合时,89项估计的总体事件发生率略有下降至23.1%。这一最新的荟萃分析包括了更多来自非洲和南美等大陆的研究,这些地区的多重受害率一直较高。研究结果还表明,与一般人群相比,临床样本中家庭受害共发生的发生率更高。临床样本中家庭受害同时发生的发生率较高,这突出表明,一旦第一个受害者引起保健或社会服务部门的注意,在同一家庭中发现第二个受害者的可能性就会增加。儿童多重受害的比例过高以及亲密伴侣暴力和虐待儿童的同时发生表明,应该将更多大家庭成员纳入家庭暴力研究。
{"title":"Prevalence and Correlates of the Family Polyvictimization: An Updated Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ko Ling Chan,Qiqi Chen","doi":"10.1177/15248380251383939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251383939","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to (a) provide updated prevalence estimates of family polyvictimization by synthesizing recent literature, (b) examine the effect sizes of how one type of family victimization impacts other types, and (c) investigate correlates of family polyvictimization. Literature databases were searched for publications from May 2018 onward. A total of 49 studies, producing 51 estimates, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this updated analysis, providing a substantial sample size of 543,196 for the general synthesis of effect sizes. Combined with a previous meta-analysis, 89 estimates were included to synthesize overall effect sizes and estimate associations among different types of family victimization and their correlates. Among the 51 new estimates, the event rate of family polyvictimization was 27.0%. When combined with the previous meta-analysis (18.3%), the overall event rate across 89 estimates decreases slightly to 23.1%. This updated meta-analysis includes more studies from continents such as Africa and South America, which consistently report higher rates of polyvictimization. Findings also show that the prevalence of family victimization co-occurrence is higher in clinical samples compared to the general population. The higher prevalence of family victimization co-occurrence in clinical samples highlights the increased likelihood of identifying a second victim in the same family once the first victim comes to the attention of health or social services. The overrepresentation of child polyvictimization and the co-occurrence of intimate partner violence and child abuse suggest that more members from extended families should be included in family violence studies.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"50 1","pages":"15248380251383939"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145434051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trauma-and-Violence-Informed Care for Victim-Survivors of Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Service Providers' Perspectives. 对家庭暴力、家庭暴力和性暴力受害者幸存者的创伤和暴力知情护理:服务提供者观点的定性综合。
IF 6.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251383933
Mia Davies,Lata Satyen,John W Toumbourou
Formal support is essential for promoting recovery and healing of victim-survivors of domestic, family, and sexual violence (DFSV). Trauma-and-violence-informed care (TVIC) aims to improve outcomes and minimize harm for trauma survivors accessing support. Despite its existence, services are not adequately meeting the needs of victim-survivors of DFSV and continue to cause harm. Guiding frameworks that can be consistently applied across services are thus needed. This qualitative meta-synthesis systematically integrates service providers' perspectives on what constitutes effective TVIC for victim-survivors of DFSV to determine practices and principles to better support victim-survivor recovery when providing care. Seven databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles and gray literature in June 2023, with an updated search in September 2024. Twenty-nine articles were included in the study, representing 694 service providers across a range of settings. A thematic synthesis approach resulted in eight key themes outlining principles of TVIC for DFSV service provision, including six individual-level themes: (a) safety, (b) survivor-centered care, (c) respectful emotional support, (d) non-judgmental, reciprocal client-practitioner relationship, (e) supporting victim-survivors to thrive, and (f) cultural safety and inclusivity; and two system-level themes: (g) provision of effective and accessible services, and (h) providing holistic services. The findings identified a holistic, trauma-and-violence-informed, survivor-centered, and inclusive approach to supporting victim-survivors, describing principles, values, and specific practices which can be applied by practitioners and services to improve service outcomes and facilitate recovery and healing.
正式支持对于促进家庭暴力、家庭暴力和性暴力(DFSV)受害者-幸存者的恢复和康复至关重要。创伤和暴力知情护理(TVIC)旨在改善结果,并尽量减少创伤幸存者获得支持的伤害。尽管存在这些服务,但仍不能充分满足DFSV受害者-幸存者的需要,并继续造成伤害。因此,需要能够跨服务一致应用的指导框架。这一定性元综合系统地整合了服务提供者对DFSV受害者-幸存者有效TVIC构成的观点,以确定在提供护理时更好地支持受害者-幸存者康复的实践和原则。在2023年6月对7个数据库进行了同行评审文章和灰色文献的搜索,并在2024年9月进行了更新搜索。该研究纳入了29篇文章,代表了694家服务提供商。主题综合方法产生了八个关键主题,概述了DFSV服务提供的TVIC原则,包括六个个人层面的主题:(A)安全,(b)以幸存者为中心的护理,(c)尊重的情感支持,(d)非评判,互惠的客户-从业者关系,(e)支持受害者-幸存者茁壮成长,以及(f)文化安全和包容性;以及两个系统层面的主题:(g)提供有效和无障碍的服务,以及(h)提供全面的服务。调查结果确定了一种全面、了解创伤和暴力、以幸存者为中心和包容的方法,以支持受害者-幸存者,描述了从业人员和服务机构可以应用的原则、价值观和具体做法,以改善服务成果,促进恢复和康复。
{"title":"Trauma-and-Violence-Informed Care for Victim-Survivors of Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Service Providers' Perspectives.","authors":"Mia Davies,Lata Satyen,John W Toumbourou","doi":"10.1177/15248380251383933","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251383933","url":null,"abstract":"Formal support is essential for promoting recovery and healing of victim-survivors of domestic, family, and sexual violence (DFSV). Trauma-and-violence-informed care (TVIC) aims to improve outcomes and minimize harm for trauma survivors accessing support. Despite its existence, services are not adequately meeting the needs of victim-survivors of DFSV and continue to cause harm. Guiding frameworks that can be consistently applied across services are thus needed. This qualitative meta-synthesis systematically integrates service providers' perspectives on what constitutes effective TVIC for victim-survivors of DFSV to determine practices and principles to better support victim-survivor recovery when providing care. Seven databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles and gray literature in June 2023, with an updated search in September 2024. Twenty-nine articles were included in the study, representing 694 service providers across a range of settings. A thematic synthesis approach resulted in eight key themes outlining principles of TVIC for DFSV service provision, including six individual-level themes: (a) safety, (b) survivor-centered care, (c) respectful emotional support, (d) non-judgmental, reciprocal client-practitioner relationship, (e) supporting victim-survivors to thrive, and (f) cultural safety and inclusivity; and two system-level themes: (g) provision of effective and accessible services, and (h) providing holistic services. The findings identified a holistic, trauma-and-violence-informed, survivor-centered, and inclusive approach to supporting victim-survivors, describing principles, values, and specific practices which can be applied by practitioners and services to improve service outcomes and facilitate recovery and healing.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"1 1","pages":"15248380251383933"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145434053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lifetime Sexual Revictimization in Military Populations: A Scoping Review. 军人终生性再受害:范围审查。
IF 6.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI: 10.1177/15248380251383936
Ellis Paulk,Dailier Ayuso,Nicole M Fava,Leslie D Frazier
There are multiple patterns of sexual revictimization specific to individuals who serve in the military, and each pattern may be associated with unique risk factors and outcomes. Our goal was to determine which aspects of those patterns have been studied and what is known. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and adhered to Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews. To meet inclusion criteria, articles had to focus on sexual victimization among military personnel, be original research published from 2000 to 2024, and written in English. Of 1,196 articles screened, 61 articles met the inclusion criteria, and 28 were selected after a full review. Following a manual citation search, 4 more articles were added, resulting in 32 articles. Overall, researchers tended to examine the link between childhood sexual abuse (CSA), military sexual trauma (MST; sexual victimization during service), and subsequent revictimization. Findings indicate that CSA increases the risk of MST and associated mental health issues, especially post-traumatic stress disorder. Additionally, social support was identified as a protective factor for sexual revictimization, and inconsistencies in defining CSA were noted across studies. This review highlights the need for standardized research on sexual revictimization in military settings. Future studies should focus on longitudinal designs and standardized measures to better understand the complex dynamics of revictimization and inform targeted interventions.
对于在军队服役的个人来说,性再受害有多种模式,每种模式都可能与独特的风险因素和结果有关。我们的目标是确定这些模式的哪些方面已经被研究过,哪些是已知的。我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目和乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指导方针,并遵循Arksey和O'Malley的范围评价方法框架。为了符合入选标准,文章必须关注军人的性受害者,发表于2000年至2024年的原创研究,并以英语写作。在筛选的1196篇文章中,61篇符合纳入标准,28篇经全面审查后入选。在人工引文检索之后,又增加了4篇文章,总共有32篇文章。总的来说,研究者倾向于研究儿童期性虐待(CSA)、军中性创伤(MST;服役期间的性受害)和随后的再受害之间的联系。研究结果表明,CSA增加了MST和相关心理健康问题的风险,特别是创伤后应激障碍。此外,社会支持被确定为性再受害的保护因素,并且在定义CSA时注意到不同研究的不一致性。这篇综述强调了对军事环境中的性再受害进行标准化研究的必要性。未来的研究应侧重于纵向设计和标准化措施,以更好地了解再受害的复杂动态,并为有针对性的干预提供信息。
{"title":"Lifetime Sexual Revictimization in Military Populations: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ellis Paulk,Dailier Ayuso,Nicole M Fava,Leslie D Frazier","doi":"10.1177/15248380251383936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251383936","url":null,"abstract":"There are multiple patterns of sexual revictimization specific to individuals who serve in the military, and each pattern may be associated with unique risk factors and outcomes. Our goal was to determine which aspects of those patterns have been studied and what is known. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and adhered to Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews. To meet inclusion criteria, articles had to focus on sexual victimization among military personnel, be original research published from 2000 to 2024, and written in English. Of 1,196 articles screened, 61 articles met the inclusion criteria, and 28 were selected after a full review. Following a manual citation search, 4 more articles were added, resulting in 32 articles. Overall, researchers tended to examine the link between childhood sexual abuse (CSA), military sexual trauma (MST; sexual victimization during service), and subsequent revictimization. Findings indicate that CSA increases the risk of MST and associated mental health issues, especially post-traumatic stress disorder. Additionally, social support was identified as a protective factor for sexual revictimization, and inconsistencies in defining CSA were noted across studies. This review highlights the need for standardized research on sexual revictimization in military settings. Future studies should focus on longitudinal designs and standardized measures to better understand the complex dynamics of revictimization and inform targeted interventions.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"28 1","pages":"15248380251383936"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145434048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Trauma Violence & Abuse
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1