The increasing frequency of forest fires under climate change scenarios poses significant threats to Forest Ecosystem Services (FES). However, adaptive management strategies and compensation frameworks tailored to specific regional characteristics remain limited. This study employs a choice experiment methodology to investigate Taiwanese residents' preferences for fire-affected FES restoration and their marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for a conservation trust fund across various altitudinal regions. A total of 2984 residents were surveyed across different altitude zones in Taiwan. The results reveal significant spatial variation in WTP for FES restoration, with residents in medium-altitude areas exhibiting the highest WTP, followed by those in high- and low-altitude regions. Based on these findings, four adaptive management scenarios were developed to assess the welfare implications of different forest management strategies. The integrated ecosystem services scenario generated the highest welfare value across all regions, highlighting the need for spatially tailored and holistic approaches to forest management. Additionally, the study introduces a novel "Forest Ecosystem Service Value Restoration Quantification Model," addressing a critical gap in the literature by providing a framework to evaluate the economic impact of forest fires and the benefits of ecosystem restoration. This model quantifies the marginal WTP for restoring forest service functions to 50 % or full capacity. The findings demonstrate the crucial role of public valuation in informing sustainable forest management and policy-making. The approach offers valuable insights for designing conservation trust funds and compensation frameworks aimed at mitigating the ecological and economic impacts of forest fires, contributing to more effective forest conservation and adaptation strategies in response to climate change.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
