Boles are weathered, clayey to silty horizons separating successive continental flood basalt (CFB) lava flows. They are found in many CFB provinces, being exceedingly common in the Deccan Traps. Most commonly red, but also often in brown, orange, green and other colours, boles are commonly viewed as “interflow” beds that formed between CFB eruptions. However, whereas some boles can be palaeosols developed on weathered flow tops, indicating an eruptive hiatus, they can also be alteration products of volcanic ash beds, interflow sediments, glassy tops and bases of basalt flows, and flow-top and flow-bottom breccias of rubbly pāhoehoe and ‘a‘ā lava flows. Individual boles may form by one or more of these mechanisms, and we show examples of these. More important, we present varied evidence that even many interflow boles have formed after their overlying flows, out of sequence, with some boles forming long after the entire CFB event. A fundamental principle of geology – the principle of superposition – would be incorrect when applied to these boles. Many interflow boles, contrary to their standard interpretation, do not represent eruptive breaks. Adding to the complexity, we show that many boles have formed within individual CFB lava flows. We present examples of such “intraflow” boles, formed as altered glassy rinds of small-scale compound pāhoehoe lobes, between the entablature and colonnade tiers of sheet lobes, within the entablatures of sheet lobes, within the massive cores of sheet lobes (sometimes more than one boles), and in random (including subvertical) orientations within sheet lobes. Our new observations highlight the complexity of boles, and the potential pitfalls in bole-based interpretations of CFB geology and stratigraphy. Alteration of volcanic glass to palagonite (hydrated glass), and further to clay minerals, is the key process in bole formation, whether interflow or intraflow.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
