Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy最新文献

Abbreviations: AFL = ablative fractional laser, CO₂= carbon dioxide, LiOB = laser-induced optical breakdown, PIH = postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, mVSS = Modified Vancouver scar scale.

Anaphylaxis is rare following the injection of hyaluronic acid fillers or human collagen for esthetic improvement of the face. We report a case occurring in a 63-year-old woman treated simultaneously with both. Symptoms included full-body urticaria and gastrointestinal symptoms that declined within a few hours, facial redness and swelling lasting a few days, and a nodule in the right tear trough that recurred over several months. Treatment with corticosteroids and antihistamine ultimately supported a complete recovery. Although rare, practitioners using injectables should be trained to manage anaphylactic events if they occur.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which is widely used in many dermatologic conditions, has also been used in the treatment of melasma in recent years. The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of PRP in melasma. Fifteen female patients with melasma participated in this study. Intradermal PRP was performed every 3 weeks for three times. We photographed all participants, performed Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), and measured melanin and erythema index (EI) with mexameter before every session and 1 month after the last session. Patients self-assessment of pigmentation grade (0-10) were also employed at baseline and 1 month after the last procedure. Mean MASI of the patients reduced from 10 ± 3.6 to 7.3 ± 2.5. Melanin index (MI) and EI evaluated by mexameter reduced from 256.5 ± 31 to 238.9 ± 29.9 and from 329.9 ± 53.8 to 322.7 ± 77.6, respectively. Mean patients self-assessment score (PSS) reduced from 8.3 ± 1.3 to 5 ± 1.4. Mean MASI, MI, and PSS reduction after treatment was found significant (p = .001, p = .000, p = .000). Intradermal application of PRP is an effective option for treatment of melasma. It also has other benefits like improvement in skin appearance. Because recurrence is common in melasma, depigmenting agents should be used after all procedures.

A picosecond-domain laser reportedly elicits positive treatment outcomes for acne scar and enlarged pores, but multiple sessions are often required. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of one-session fractional picosecond 1064-nm laser in treating atrophic acne scar and conspicuous pores. Fifty-nine acne scar patients with skin phototypes III and IV were treated with picosecond 1064-nm laser with microlens array (MLA) (8 mm spot, 0.8 J/cm², 10 Hz) for one session. The efficacy of acne scar was evaluated by Antera® 3D CS, whereas facial pore counts and diameter were evaluated by VISIA-CR and dermoscopic images, respectively. All measurements were performed at baseline, weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6. Acne scar volume and facial pore counts showed a statistically significant reduction at 1 week and subsequent follow-up period when compared to baseline (weeks 1-6; P < .001). The volume of acne scars and the number of enlarge pores decreased by 22.03% and 15.13%, respectively. Of note, there was no significant change in diameter of facial pores. The adverse events, including erythema and folliculitis, were mild and short-lived. A single session of picosecond 1064-nm laser with MLA was safe and effective in improving atrophic acne scar and the number of enlarged pores.

The skin disease of the pilosebaceous unit created by demodex mites is called demodicosis. Recently, it has been brought to the agenda that laser therapies can be effective in reducing the intensity of demodex parasite. With this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of pro-yellow laser applied to the face on the intensity of demodex parasite. Twenty-five patients who had referred to the dermatology polyclinic with a complaint of rash on the face and who had been given proyellow laser therapy during the past year were included in the study. Average pre-laser therapy demodex number per cm² was 3.9 ± 5.0, while average post-therapy demodex number per cm² was 2.6 ± 4.9 (p = .117). The 577-nm pro-yellow laser caused a change in demodex density. We found that the number of demodex following laser therapy decreased in some patients, while it increased in some others.