Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy最新文献

Localized fat and excess body fat: this is one of the main causes of dissatisfaction with body contour and decreased self-esteem. The objective of this report is to present the results of treatment using Capenergy C 200 in a group of young volunteers who received treatment only in the right half of the body. We will review the science and literature of the effect of TECAR and its role in body contouring. The average decrease in the arm is 2.9 cm p = .026. The nipple rise was 2.1 cm, p = .002. The decrease in abdominal diameter was 3.3 cm, p = .027 at the end of the treatment. For the thigh, the difference in diameter was 3.9 p = .026, this difference being statistically significant. TECAR radiofrequency treatment therapies, for body contouring in the breast, arms, abdomen and thighs, are effective and can show positive results after 6 treatment sessions, resulting in body satisfaction at the end of the treatment.

(a) To evaluate the efficacy and safety of narrow-band intense-pulsed light (DPL) in immediate post-operative scar. (b) To observe the process of scar formation under dermoscopy in the first 6 months. Nine patients with postoperative scars were enrolled in the randomized, prospective, split-scar study. Patients were treated in one half of the scar with DPL for cosmetic improvement at a wavelength of 500-600 nm and the other half was not treated as control. The laser treatments were initiated 2 weeks after the surgery and were given 3 times over a 4-week period. All patients were followed-up for 3 months from the last treatment. Photographs and dermoscopy digital images were collected each time. (a) Neither DPL or control produce statistically significant improvements in Vancouver Scar Scale. Moreover, comparatively, there was no statistical difference in Vancouver Scar Scale between DPL or control. However, 6 out of 9 patients treated with DPL had reduced scores in vascularity sooner compared with control. (b) Under dermoscopy, redness, and swelling were obvious from 2 weeks after surgery, but were gradually alleviated. The surface of the scar gradually became uneven and rough. DPL might be beneficial in early recovery of immediate post-operative scar.

Microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) and non-ablative 1565 nm fractional laser (NAFL) have recently been introduced as new techniques to address the growing concern of facial photoaging. In this prospective randomized split-face study, we wanted to compare the safety and efficacy of MFR with that of NAFL for the treatment of facial photoaging in Asian patients. Fifteen healthy Chinese patients were enrolled for this randomized split-face study. Each patient underwent three sessions of treatment with MFR and NAFL on opposite sides of their face, one month apart. A blinded outcome assessment of the photoaging severity was performed by two independent plastic surgeons on a 5-point visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-4). Patient satisfaction was also scored based on a 5-point VAS (0 = dissatisfaction, 4 = extremely satisfied). Sagging of the nasolabial groove was evaluated using the Antera 3D camera, facial wrinkles and pores using the VISIA skin analysis system. Any adverse events that occurred during the study were also evaluated. Based on the VAS scores and results from the Antera 3D and VISIA, it was noted that there was a significant improvement in facial skin laxity, wrinkles, and pores, and lesser sagging of the nasolabial groove on both the MFR and NAFL sides of the face, compared with that of the baseline. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment and reported tolerable pain and crusting. Although no significant differences were observed between the MFR and NAFL treatments, the NAFL treatment resulted in a shorter downtime(4.56 ± 2.72d) than the MFR treatment(6.96 ± 3.27d). This study confirms the efficacy of MFR and NAFL treatments for facial skin rejuvenation in Asian patients. Furthermore, the therapies were found to be safe and well-tolerated. Our findings suggest that NAFL may be a more convenient treatment modality for facial photoaging because of its shorter downtime. However, sagging of the nasolabial groove was more improved by the MFR treatment than by the NAFL treatment.

Plantar warts are common cutaneous lesions caused by the human papillomavirus. Treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts stays a continuous challenge, and they are more refractory to treatment than common warts. To compare the efficacy of Long-Pulsed neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser versus pulsed dye laser (PDL) on the therapy of multiple recalcitrant plantar warts. Thirty patients with recalcitrant plantar warts were included in the current study. Half the number of warts were treated by PDL in each patient, while the other half were treated by Nd:YAG. Laser sessions were applied every 2 weeks for a maximum of six sessions. Patients were followed up both clinically and using dermoscopy. There was a complete clearance of warts in 20 patients (66.7%) with Nd:YAG laser and 19 patients (63.3%) with PDL with no statistically significant difference between both types of lasers. Pain during laser sessions was higher with Nd:YAG laser PDL and it was statistically significant (p = .0001). Both Nd:YAG laser and PDL showed efficacy and safety for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts. The use of dermoscopy adds great value in evaluating treatment response and in decreasing the incidence of recurrence.