Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-10-17DOI: 10.1037/com0000390
Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch, Victoria F Ratcliffe, Anna Wilkinson
Detection dogs are required to learn and alert to multiple different odors during training and to generalize this learning to similar odors when working. They should be both sensitive to variation in the target odors and specific enough to avoid false alerts, but how readily they achieve this is likely to depend on the training method employed. The majority of agencies train by presenting single target odors in isolation, and adding additional odors consecutively, although recent research with rats suggests intermixing the target odors concurrently throughout training may be a more effective approach. This study therefore tested the relative efficacy of intermixed training in dogs. Using an odor-detection lineup, pet dogs were trained to detect two target odors, A and B. Those allocated to the "sequential" group were trained to criterion on odor A and then trained on odor B (or vice versa), the "compound" group were trained on a mixture of AB, and the "intermixed" group trained on A and B concurrently. Each dog was then tested on all combinations of the test stimuli (A, B, and AB), as well as combinations containing a novel interferent (AC, BC, and ABC). Results revealed that dogs trained by the intermixed method made significantly more correct (true positive) indications, and significantly fewer miss (false negative) indications than the other two methods, suggesting that intermixed training is more effective than currently used alternative training methods. Thus, for improved performance and generalization, we recommend detection dog training should use an intermixed method of training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
探测犬需要在训练过程中学习多种不同气味并发出警报,并在工作时将这种学习归纳为类似气味。它们既要对目标气味的变化敏感,又要有足够的特异性以避免错误警报,但它们如何轻易做到这一点可能取决于所采用的训练方法。大多数机构的训练方法是单独呈现单一目标气味,然后连续添加其他气味,但最近对大鼠的研究表明,在整个训练过程中同时混合目标气味可能是一种更有效的方法。因此,本研究测试了狗混合训练的相对效果。被分配到 "顺序 "组的宠物狗先接受气味 A 的标准训练,然后再接受气味 B 的训练(反之亦然);"复合 "组接受 AB 混合气味的训练;而 "混合 "组则同时接受 A 和 B 的训练。然后,每只狗都要接受所有测试刺激组合(A、B 和 AB)以及包含新干扰物的组合(AC、BC 和 ABC)的测试。结果表明,与其他两种方法相比,采用混合法训练的狗做出的正确指示(真阳性)明显更多,而错误指示(假阴性)明显更少,这表明混合训练比目前使用的其他训练方法更有效。因此,为了提高性能和普及率,我们建议在训练探测犬时使用混合训练法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The impact of training method on odor learning and generalization in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).","authors":"Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch, Victoria F Ratcliffe, Anna Wilkinson","doi":"10.1037/com0000390","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detection dogs are required to learn and alert to multiple different odors during training and to generalize this learning to similar odors when working. They should be both sensitive to variation in the target odors and specific enough to avoid false alerts, but how readily they achieve this is likely to depend on the training method employed. The majority of agencies train by presenting single target odors in isolation, and adding additional odors consecutively, although recent research with rats suggests intermixing the target odors concurrently throughout training may be a more effective approach. This study therefore tested the relative efficacy of intermixed training in dogs. Using an odor-detection lineup, pet dogs were trained to detect two target odors, A and B. Those allocated to the \"sequential\" group were trained to criterion on odor A and then trained on odor B (or vice versa), the \"compound\" group were trained on a mixture of AB, and the \"intermixed\" group trained on A and B concurrently. Each dog was then tested on all combinations of the test stimuli (A, B, and AB), as well as combinations containing a novel interferent (AC, BC, and ABC). Results revealed that dogs trained by the intermixed method made significantly more correct (true positive) indications, and significantly fewer miss (false negative) indications than the other two methods, suggesting that intermixed training is more effective than currently used alternative training methods. Thus, for improved performance and generalization, we recommend detection dog training should use an intermixed method of training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142481298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1037/com0000382
Noah Steckley, Amber Thatcher, Susan M Greene, Heather Warner, Kendra Kuehn, Nathan Insel
Play behavior has been extensively studied across species, but its direct role in social relationships remains unclear. Here we use an "isolation versus separation" protocol to identify behaviors associated with relationship renewal in adolescent female rats. Members of a dyad that had been separated for 24 hr, without isolation from other peers, initially increased investigative behaviors relative to nonseparated peers; however, in contrast with social isolation, separation by itself did not increase rough-and-tumble play. The data suggest that increased play following isolation depends on general motivations, rather than a "peer-specific" drive to renew relationships with an individual. This is consistent with a role of play in more general social learning rather than reestablishing bonds or expectations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Together again but no need to play: Dissociating effects of isolation and separation on social interaction in female rats (Rattus norvegicus).","authors":"Noah Steckley, Amber Thatcher, Susan M Greene, Heather Warner, Kendra Kuehn, Nathan Insel","doi":"10.1037/com0000382","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Play behavior has been extensively studied across species, but its direct role in social relationships remains unclear. Here we use an \"isolation versus separation\" protocol to identify behaviors associated with relationship renewal in adolescent female rats. Members of a dyad that had been separated for 24 hr, without isolation from other peers, initially increased investigative behaviors relative to nonseparated peers; however, in contrast with social isolation, separation by itself did not increase rough-and-tumble play. The data suggest that increased play following isolation depends on general motivations, rather than a \"peer-specific\" drive to renew relationships with an individual. This is consistent with a role of play in more general social learning rather than reestablishing bonds or expectations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Drugs, bomb materials, fruits, and even medical conditions such as cancer are all stimuli that a dog's nose can be trained to detect, and the dog then can report reliable information about those stimuli in terms of presence or absence. This essay discusses the tremendous effort that goes into training expert detection dogs, highlighting different ways of instantiate training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
毒品、炸弹材料、水果,甚至癌症等病症都可以通过训练狗的鼻子来探测,然后狗可以报告这些刺激物存在或不存在的可靠信息。这篇文章讨论了训练专业侦查犬所付出的巨大努力,重点介绍了不同的实例训练方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"One smell, two smells, intermixed, combined, or queued smells: What training procedure promotes the best generalization of odor detection by dogs?","authors":"Michael J Beran","doi":"10.1037/com0000413","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drugs, bomb materials, fruits, and even medical conditions such as cancer are all stimuli that a dog's nose can be trained to detect, and the dog then can report reliable information about those stimuli in terms of presence or absence. This essay discusses the tremendous effort that goes into training expert detection dogs, highlighting different ways of instantiate training. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"139 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143494959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-11DOI: 10.1037/com0000380
Patricia Gasalla, Jaime Figueroa, Michael R Waldmann, Dominic M Dwyer
Associative learning models typically reflect statistical relationships between experienced events. Causal models can go beyond this information to specify the ways in which events are related. This meta-representational aspect of causal models allows them to reflect uncertainty about relationships between events: for example, if a light initially leads to sucrose but subsequently the light is experienced without sucrose, this might first support formation of a light-causes-sucrose model and subsequently lead to uncertainty over whether the model remained accurate. Prior studies of Pavlovian conditioning in rats manipulated sucrose-magazine access during extinction to produce uncertainty about reward presence or absence. Rats were sensitive to covering of the site of reward delivery, which was interpreted as evidence for a causal-model account reflecting uncertainty. However, associative accounts-based on the direct impact of the dipper mechanism used to deliver sucrose through secondary reinforcement or contextual renewal of responding-can also explain the results. In two new experiments, manipulation of the dipper mechanism through extinction and test phases resulted in behavior consistent with these associative accounts. However, demonstration of the importance of the sucrose dipper suggests that the reward delivery mechanism should be included in a causal model. Such a revised causal model also provides an account of the impact of manipulating the sucrose dipper. While these experiments do not conclusively decide between associative and causal models as explanations of rodent behavior, they do illustrate the value of incremental experimental study and the importance of methodological detail in addressing questions of comparative cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
关联学习模型通常反映的是经验事件之间的统计关系。因果模型可以超越这些信息,具体说明事件之间的关联方式。因果模型的这种元表征方面使其能够反映事件间关系的不确定性:例如,如果一束光最初会导致蔗糖,但随后体验到的光却没有蔗糖,这可能首先支持光导致蔗糖模型的形成,随后导致对该模型是否仍然准确的不确定性。之前对大鼠巴甫洛夫条件反射的研究在消退过程中操纵了蔗糖-杂志的存取,以产生奖励存在或不存在的不确定性。大鼠对奖赏传递地点的覆盖很敏感,这被解释为反映不确定性的因果模型账户的证据。然而,基于通过二次强化或情境更新反应来传递蔗糖的北斗七星机制的直接影响的联想模型也可以解释这一结果。在两个新的实验中,通过消退和测试阶段对北斗七星机制的操纵导致了与这些联想说法一致的行为。然而,蔗糖北斗七星的重要性表明,奖励传递机制应被纳入因果模型中。这种修正后的因果模型还能解释操纵蔗糖桶的影响。虽然这些实验并不能最终决定用联想模型还是因果模型来解释啮齿动物的行为,但它们确实说明了渐进实验研究的价值,以及在解决比较认知问题时方法细节的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Beyond the information (not) given: Associative mechanisms versus representations of uncertainty in extinction in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus).","authors":"Patricia Gasalla, Jaime Figueroa, Michael R Waldmann, Dominic M Dwyer","doi":"10.1037/com0000380","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Associative learning models typically reflect statistical relationships between experienced events. Causal models can go beyond this information to specify the ways in which events are related. This meta-representational aspect of causal models allows them to reflect uncertainty about relationships between events: for example, if a light initially leads to sucrose but subsequently the light is experienced without sucrose, this might first support formation of a light-causes-sucrose model and subsequently lead to uncertainty over whether the model remained accurate. Prior studies of Pavlovian conditioning in rats manipulated sucrose-magazine access during extinction to produce uncertainty about reward presence or absence. Rats were sensitive to covering of the site of reward delivery, which was interpreted as evidence for a causal-model account reflecting uncertainty. However, associative accounts-based on the direct impact of the dipper mechanism used to deliver sucrose through secondary reinforcement or contextual renewal of responding-can also explain the results. In two new experiments, manipulation of the dipper mechanism through extinction and test phases resulted in behavior consistent with these associative accounts. However, demonstration of the importance of the sucrose dipper suggests that the reward delivery mechanism should be included in a causal model. Such a revised causal model also provides an account of the impact of manipulating the sucrose dipper. While these experiments do not conclusively decide between associative and causal models as explanations of rodent behavior, they do illustrate the value of incremental experimental study and the importance of methodological detail in addressing questions of comparative cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"69-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142632957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1037/com0000379
Natsuko Sakurai, Masaki Tomonaga
Dolphins are known to recognize their environment through echolocation. Previous studies have reported that they can discriminate the shape, size, thickness, and even material of objects through echolocation. However, little is known about the discrimination of quantities other than size and thickness (e.g., the number of objects). It is also unclear whether Weber's law (i.e., ratio dependency) holds for quantity discrimination through echolocation. In this study, we examined relative quantity judgments of visually occluded objects presented underwater by bottlenose dolphins. We found that they could discriminate pairs of same-sized objects ranging from one to eight, with performance improving as the difference ratio between the two numbers increased. In addition, their performance also improved as the magnitude of the number of objects involved increased. An additional test revealed that the accuracy of discrimination through echolocation was comparable to that of visual relative quantity judgments of the objects presented above water. On the other hand, under the condition that the overall size of each object (i.e., the sum of areas) was incongruent with the number of objects, performance was lower than when number and size were covarying. However, even within the incongruent condition, the effect of the number ratio was still observed, suggesting that the dolphins might have used various types of quantity information, such as number and size, flexibly to solve the task. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
众所周知,海豚能通过回声定位识别周围环境。先前的研究报告称,海豚可以通过回声定位辨别物体的形状、大小、厚度甚至材料。然而,除了大小和厚度(如物体的数量)之外,海豚对其他数量的辨别能力却知之甚少。此外,还不清楚韦伯定律(即比率依赖性)是否适用于通过回声定位进行的数量辨别。在这项研究中,我们考察了瓶鼻海豚对水下呈现的视觉隐蔽物体的相对数量判断。我们发现,海豚可以分辨出 1 到 8 个大小相同的成对物体,随着两个数字之间差值比的增加,海豚的分辨能力也在提高。此外,随着涉及物体数量的增加,它们的表现也会提高。另一项测试表明,通过回声定位进行辨别的准确性与通过视觉对水面上的物体进行相对数量判断的准确性相当。另一方面,在每个物体的总体大小(即面积总和)与物体数量不一致的条件下,表现低于数量和大小共变时的表现。然而,即使在不一致的条件下,仍然可以观察到数量比的影响,这表明海豚可能灵活运用了各种数量信息,如数量和大小,来完成任务。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Hearing \"number\"? Relative quantity judgments through the echolocation by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).","authors":"Natsuko Sakurai, Masaki Tomonaga","doi":"10.1037/com0000379","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dolphins are known to recognize their environment through echolocation. Previous studies have reported that they can discriminate the shape, size, thickness, and even material of objects through echolocation. However, little is known about the discrimination of quantities other than size and thickness (e.g., the number of objects). It is also unclear whether Weber's law (i.e., ratio dependency) holds for quantity discrimination through echolocation. In this study, we examined relative quantity judgments of visually occluded objects presented underwater by bottlenose dolphins. We found that they could discriminate pairs of same-sized objects ranging from one to eight, with performance improving as the difference ratio between the two numbers increased. In addition, their performance also improved as the magnitude of the number of objects involved increased. An additional test revealed that the accuracy of discrimination through echolocation was comparable to that of visual relative quantity judgments of the objects presented above water. On the other hand, under the condition that the overall size of each object (i.e., the sum of areas) was incongruent with the number of objects, performance was lower than when number and size were covarying. However, even within the incongruent condition, the effect of the number ratio was still observed, suggesting that the dolphins might have used various types of quantity information, such as number and size, flexibly to solve the task. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"214-231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The featured article by Sakurai and Tomonaga (2024) in this issue has set out to test to what extent dolphins can estimate relative differences between pairs of object numbers by echolocation. For this they used three consecutive experiments with multiple controls and compared their data statistically to existing data from visual experiments done on other species. Previous studies already indicate that dolphins can visually estimate relative numerosity (e.g., Jaakkola et al., 2005; Yaman et al., 2012). Therefore, the goal of the present study was to investigate the dolphin's capacity to apply Weber's law (quantity judgments are more accurate proportional to the quantities investigated) to two sets of object quantities under sonar evaluation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
樱井和Tomonaga(2024)在本期杂志上的专题文章开始测试海豚在多大程度上可以通过回声定位来估计物体数量对之间的相对差异。为此,他们使用了三个连续的实验,有多个控制,并将他们的数据与现有的其他物种的视觉实验数据进行了统计比较。先前的研究已经表明,海豚可以通过视觉来估计相对数量(例如,Jaakkola等人,2005;Yaman et al., 2012)。因此,本研究的目的是研究海豚在声纳评估下将韦伯定律(数量判断与所调查的数量成正比)应用于两组物体数量的能力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"What is it like to hear quantities? Testing dolphins on classic number estimation using a sonar setup.","authors":"Alice Auersperg","doi":"10.1037/com0000403","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The featured article by Sakurai and Tomonaga (2024) in this issue has set out to test to what extent dolphins can estimate relative differences between pairs of object numbers by echolocation. For this they used three consecutive experiments with multiple controls and compared their data statistically to existing data from visual experiments done on other species. Previous studies already indicate that dolphins can visually estimate relative numerosity (e.g., Jaakkola et al., 2005; Yaman et al., 2012). Therefore, the goal of the present study was to investigate the dolphin's capacity to apply Weber's law (quantity judgments are more accurate proportional to the quantities investigated) to two sets of object quantities under sonar evaluation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"138 4","pages":"211-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142830862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1037/com0000385
Yuri Kawaguchi, Zsófia Virányi, Tamás Faragó, Ludwig Huber, Christoph J Völter
Understanding conspecifics' age classes is crucial for animals, facilitating adaptive behavioral responses to their social environment. This may include gathering and integrating information through multiple modalities. Using a cross-modal preferential-looking paradigm, we investigated whether dogs possess a cross-modal mental representation of conspecific age classes. In Experiment 1, dogs were presented with images of an adult dog and a puppy projected side by side on a wall while a vocalization of either an adult dog or a puppy was played back simultaneously. To test the effect of relative body size between adult dog and puppy images, two size conditions (natural size and same size) were employed for visual stimuli. We examined dogs' looking behavior in response to cross-modally matched versus mismatched stimuli. We predicted that if dogs have cross-modal representations of age classes, they would exhibit prolonged attention toward matched images compared to mismatched ones. In Experiment 2, we administered the same paradigm within an eye-tracking experiment to further improve the measurement quality of dogs' looking times. However, dogs' looking times in either experiment did not demonstrate significant differences based on the match or mismatch between image and vocalization. Instead, we observed a size effect, indicating dogs' increased attention toward larger adult dog images compared to smaller puppy images. Consequently, we found no evidence of cross-modal representation of age class in dogs. Nonetheless, we found increased looking time and pupil size upon hearing puppy vocalizations compared to adult vocalizations in Experiment 2, suggesting that dogs exhibited heightened arousal when hearing puppy whining. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Cross-modal perception of puppies and adult conspecifics in dogs (Canis familiaris).","authors":"Yuri Kawaguchi, Zsófia Virányi, Tamás Faragó, Ludwig Huber, Christoph J Völter","doi":"10.1037/com0000385","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding conspecifics' age classes is crucial for animals, facilitating adaptive behavioral responses to their social environment. This may include gathering and integrating information through multiple modalities. Using a cross-modal preferential-looking paradigm, we investigated whether dogs possess a cross-modal mental representation of conspecific age classes. In Experiment 1, dogs were presented with images of an adult dog and a puppy projected side by side on a wall while a vocalization of either an adult dog or a puppy was played back simultaneously. To test the effect of relative body size between adult dog and puppy images, two size conditions (natural size and same size) were employed for visual stimuli. We examined dogs' looking behavior in response to cross-modally matched versus mismatched stimuli. We predicted that if dogs have cross-modal representations of age classes, they would exhibit prolonged attention toward matched images compared to mismatched ones. In Experiment 2, we administered the same paradigm within an eye-tracking experiment to further improve the measurement quality of dogs' looking times. However, dogs' looking times in either experiment did not demonstrate significant differences based on the match or mismatch between image and vocalization. Instead, we observed a size effect, indicating dogs' increased attention toward larger adult dog images compared to smaller puppy images. Consequently, we found no evidence of cross-modal representation of age class in dogs. Nonetheless, we found increased looking time and pupil size upon hearing puppy vocalizations compared to adult vocalizations in Experiment 2, suggesting that dogs exhibited heightened arousal when hearing puppy whining. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"246-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-05-16DOI: 10.1037/com0000386
Patrick Anselme, Aaron P Blaisdell
Organisms are believed to attempt to maximize their net energy intake while foraging. The paradoxical choice task shows that they may instead prefer to obtain information rather than primary reward when the outcome is uncertain. That is, they prefer stimuli that consistently predict food or no food (informative option), to stimuli that inconsistently predict both food and no food in larger amounts (noninformative option). This task also seems to indicate that some species (like pigeons, Columba livia, and starlings, Sturnus vulgaris) are more prone to choose the informative option, while other species (like rats, Rattus norvegicus, and humans, Homo sapiens) tend to favor reward procurement through the noninformative option. There is empirical evidence for and against this view. However, an analysis of the literature suggests that species differences in paradoxical choice might be less pronounced than often believed. We argue that pigeons and rats are usually not tested under conditions that are motivationally equivalent for both species-in particular, the opportunities to track consistent stimulus-food pairings are less often met in the rat studies than in the pigeon studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
人们认为,生物在觅食时会试图最大限度地摄入净能量。悖论选择任务表明,当结果不确定时,它们可能更愿意获得信息而不是主要奖励。也就是说,相对于不一致地同时预测有食物和无食物且数量较大的刺激(非信息选项),它们更喜欢持续预测有食物或无食物的刺激(信息选项)。这项任务似乎还表明,某些物种(如鸽子和椋鸟)更倾向于选择信息选项,而其他物种(如大鼠和人类)则倾向于通过非信息选项获取奖励。有经验证据支持和反对这种观点。然而,对文献的分析表明,矛盾选择的物种差异可能没有人们通常认为的那么明显。我们认为,对鸽子和大鼠进行测试时,通常没有在两种动物动机相同的条件下进行--特别是,在大鼠的研究中,追踪刺激与食物配对的一致性的机会比在鸽子的研究中更少。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Differences in paradoxical choice between pigeons (Columba livia) and rats (Rattus norvegicus): The problem of cue trackability.","authors":"Patrick Anselme, Aaron P Blaisdell","doi":"10.1037/com0000386","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organisms are believed to attempt to maximize their net energy intake while foraging. The paradoxical choice task shows that they may instead prefer to obtain information rather than primary reward when the outcome is uncertain. That is, they prefer stimuli that consistently predict food or no food (informative option), to stimuli that inconsistently predict both food and no food in larger amounts (noninformative option). This task also seems to indicate that some species (like pigeons, <i>Columba livia,</i> and starlings, <i>Sturnus vulgaris</i>) are more prone to choose the informative option, while other species (like rats, <i>Rattus norvegicus</i>, and humans, <i>Homo sapiens</i>) tend to favor reward procurement through the noninformative option. There is empirical evidence for and against this view. However, an analysis of the literature suggests that species differences in paradoxical choice might be less pronounced than often believed. We argue that pigeons and rats are usually not tested under conditions that are motivationally equivalent for both species-in particular, the opportunities to track consistent stimulus-food pairings are less often met in the rat studies than in the pigeon studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"276-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140946463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Serial pattern learning describes behavior in which a subject anticipates not only the time and effort needed for the next reinforcer but also the pattern of time and effort to reinforcers after the first. Chandel et al. (2021) found that pigeons left a progressive (increasing ratio) schedule earlier than would have been optimal. They argued that the pigeons anticipated the harder-to-obtain reinforcers beyond the next one. In the present experiments, pigeons were trained on a progressive schedule for which each reinforcer was successively easier to obtain. However, the initial choice was between a fixed ratio schedule (FR23) for which a reinforcer was easier to obtain than the first reinforcer on the improving progressive schedule (32 pecks). Delayed discounting theory suggests that the pigeons would prefer the FR23 because more immediate reinforcers should be preferred, whereas serial pattern learning suggests that the progressive schedule might be preferred because easier-to-obtain reinforcers would follow the initially harder 32 pecks. In Experiment 1, a preference for the fixed ratio schedule was not found, however, in Experiment 2, when the two alternatives were equated for the number of reinforcers that could be obtained on each trial, a significant preference for the improving progressive schedule was found. The results of Experiment 2 were consistent with the serial pattern learning hypothesis. The pigeons did not choose the more immediate reinforcer associated with fixed ratio alternative. Rather, they showed a preference for the improving progressive schedule for which later reinforcers would be easier to obtain. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Serial pattern learning: Pigeons (Columba livia) prefer an improving schedule over an initially easier fixed ratio schedule.","authors":"Miri Ifraimov, Daniel N Peng, Thomas R Zentall","doi":"10.1037/com0000383","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serial pattern learning describes behavior in which a subject anticipates not only the time and effort needed for the next reinforcer but also the pattern of time and effort to reinforcers after the first. Chandel et al. (2021) found that pigeons left a progressive (increasing ratio) schedule earlier than would have been optimal. They argued that the pigeons anticipated the harder-to-obtain reinforcers beyond the next one. In the present experiments, pigeons were trained on a progressive schedule for which each reinforcer was successively easier to obtain. However, the initial choice was between a fixed ratio schedule (FR23) for which a reinforcer was easier to obtain than the first reinforcer on the improving progressive schedule (32 pecks). Delayed discounting theory suggests that the pigeons would prefer the FR23 because more immediate reinforcers should be preferred, whereas serial pattern learning suggests that the progressive schedule might be preferred because easier-to-obtain reinforcers would follow the initially harder 32 pecks. In Experiment 1, a preference for the fixed ratio schedule was not found, however, in Experiment 2, when the two alternatives were equated for the number of reinforcers that could be obtained on each trial, a significant preference for the improving progressive schedule was found. The results of Experiment 2 were consistent with the serial pattern learning hypothesis. The pigeons did not choose the more immediate reinforcer associated with fixed ratio alternative. Rather, they showed a preference for the improving progressive schedule for which later reinforcers would be easier to obtain. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"138 4","pages":"232-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142830846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-02-29DOI: 10.1037/com0000375
Gillian L Vale, Jesse G Leinwand, Priyanka B Joshi
Animals navigate complex environments that present both hazards and essential resources. The prioritization of perceptual information that is relevant to their next actions, such as accessing or avoiding different resources, poses a potential challenge to animals, one that can impact survival. While animals' attentional biases toward negatively valanced and threatening stimuli have been explored, parallel biases toward differently valued resources remain understudied. Here, we assessed whether three primate species (chimpanzees [Pan troglodytes], gorillas [Gorilla gorilla gorilla], and Japanese macaques [Macaca fuscata]) prioritized their attention to positively valued resources-preferred foods compared to unpreferred foods. We employed a computerized dot probe attentional bias task in which we presented participants with paired images of their preferred and unpreferred foods in randomized locations (left or right). Latencies to touch the "probe" that replaced either image revealed that all three species responded faster to the probe when it replaced the preferred option (χ²(1) = 284.50, SE² = .03, p < .001). The uniformity of the primates' responses hints that a propensity to prioritize highly preferred items is rooted in these primates' evolutionary past, one that may serve as a mechanism to rapidly detect and locate resources such as highly valued foods. Future research will help disentangle the role that color plays in these biases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
动物在复杂的环境中穿梭,这些环境既有危险,也有必要的资源。如何确定与动物下一步行动(如获取或避开不同资源)相关的感知信息的优先顺序,是动物面临的一个潜在挑战,也可能影响动物的生存。虽然人们已经探索了动物对负值和威胁性刺激的注意偏差,但对不同价值资源的平行偏差仍未得到充分研究。在这里,我们评估了三种灵长类动物(黑猩猩、大猩猩和日本猕猴)是否会优先注意有积极价值的资源--首选食物而非非首选食物。我们采用了一种计算机化的点探针注意偏差任务,即在随机位置(左侧或右侧)向参与者展示其偏好和非偏好食物的配对图像。当 "探针 "取代首选图像时,三种灵长类动物对 "探针 "的反应都更快(χ²(1) = 284.50, SE² = .03, p < .001)。灵长类动物反应的一致性表明,在灵长类动物的进化过程中,它们有一种优先选择高度偏好项目的倾向,这种倾向可能是一种快速检测和定位资源(如高价值食物)的机制。未来的研究将有助于厘清颜色在这些偏见中所扮演的角色。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Testing three primate species' attentional biases toward preferred and unpreferred foods: Seeing red or high valued food?","authors":"Gillian L Vale, Jesse G Leinwand, Priyanka B Joshi","doi":"10.1037/com0000375","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals navigate complex environments that present both hazards and essential resources. The prioritization of perceptual information that is relevant to their next actions, such as accessing or avoiding different resources, poses a potential challenge to animals, one that can impact survival. While animals' attentional biases toward negatively valanced and threatening stimuli have been explored, parallel biases toward differently valued resources remain understudied. Here, we assessed whether three primate species (chimpanzees [<i>Pan troglodytes</i>], gorillas [<i>Gorilla gorilla gorilla</i>], and Japanese macaques [<i>Macaca fuscata</i>]) prioritized their attention to positively valued resources-preferred foods compared to unpreferred foods. We employed a computerized dot probe attentional bias task in which we presented participants with paired images of their preferred and unpreferred foods in randomized locations (left or right). Latencies to touch the \"probe\" that replaced either image revealed that all three species responded faster to the probe when it replaced the preferred option (χ²(1) = 284.50, <i>SE</i>² = .03, <i>p</i> < .001). The uniformity of the primates' responses hints that a propensity to prioritize highly preferred items is rooted in these primates' evolutionary past, one that may serve as a mechanism to rapidly detect and locate resources such as highly valued foods. Future research will help disentangle the role that color plays in these biases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"177-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139998240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}