Journal of Comparative Psychology最新文献

Logical inference is often assumed a human-unique ability, although many species of apes and monkeys have shown some facility within a two-cup task in which one cup is baited, the primate is shown the cup which is empty (an exclusion cue), and subsequently chooses the other baited cup. In published reports, New World monkey species show a limited ability to choose successfully, often with half or more of the subjects tested not showing the ability with auditory cues or with exclusion cues. In this study, five cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) were tested in a two-cup task with visual or auditory cues which revealed the presence or absence of bait, and in a second study, were tested with a four-cup array using a variety of walls to define the baiting space and a variety of visual cues including inclusion and exclusion. Tamarins demonstrated the ability to use either visual or auditory exclusion cues to find rewards in the two-cup study, although the visual cue required some exposure before accuracy was expressed. Experiment 2 revealed that two of three tamarins' first guesses to find rewards matched best a logic model. When they made errors, they typically chose cups adjacent to the cued location or made choices that seemed generated from avoiding empty cups. These results suggest that tamarins can deduce the location of food using reasoning, although the ability is only applied robustly to first guesses, while second guesses are motivated by approach/avoidance and proximity to cued locations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Prikrylová et al. (see record 2023-79461-001) contribute a paper to this issue in which they tested two-dimensional individual recognition of familiar subjects in African gray parrots. They not only tested familiar individual recognition per se but also the effect of manipulating individual and combined features in the head and the body of their stimuli. Notably, instead of using discrimination tasks, which have previously been applied in bird studies (e.g., Hauser & Huber-Eicher, 2004; Nakamura et al., 2003; Watanabe & Ito, 1990), they went through great effort applying a matching-to-sample approach. This is particularly important as it allows for testing familiar conspecific recognition on a more conceptual level than a discrimination task. Moreover, it facilitates the comparison with previous work done on primates (e.g., Micheletta et al., 2015; Parr et al., 2000, 2006; Talbot et al., 2016). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Many argue that the animal understanding of human referential communication is a by-product of domestication. However, the domestication hypothesis is not unanimously supported as some nondomesticated species such as sea lions, dolphins, or African elephants perform well in the understanding of human pointing gesture. There is a need to study species with different levels of domestication across different taxa to understand the emerging communicative sociocognitive skills in animals that provide them with the ability to comprehend human-given cues. We conducted a pilot study to assess the performance of eight sledging reindeer following a commonly used human-given cue (a pointing gesture associated with gaze at the target and local enhancement) in a two-way choice task. Domestic reindeer are considered semicaptive, because of their husbandry system in free-ranging conditions, with limited control of their reproduction. We observed that the willingness of the reindeer to participate in the test was age-related, with the younger individuals which lack experience with humans being reluctant to approach the experimenters. Within the more experienced working sledging reindeer, two individuals showed excellent skills and followed the human-given cues 9 out of 10 times. Reindeer show great potential in following a human indication to locate hidden food with minimal training when properly tamed. The effect of previous experience with humans requires further investigation. This is the first demonstration in cervids of an ability to make use of experimenter-given cues in an object-choice task. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

"How" an action is performed is not solely determined by biomechanical constraints, but it depends on the agent's intention, that is, "why" the action is performed. Recent findings suggest that intentions can be specified at a tangible and quantifiable level in the kinematics of movements; that is, different motor intentions translate into different kinematic patterns. In the present study, we used 3D kinematical analysis to investigate whether the organization of climbing plants' approach-to-grasp action is sensitive to the kind of intention driving their movement toward potential support, namely individual or social. For the individual condition, a plant in isolation acted upon the support. For the social condition, two plants were located in the same pot opposite to each other with a support in the middle. Results indicate differences in kinematics depending on the context within which the plant is acting. In the presence of neighbors, climbing plants are able to modify their behaviors to maximize their long-term gains, including the grasping of a potential support. Overall, these data suggest that the organization of climbing plants' kinematics is sensitive to the "intention" driving their movement toward a potential support. To discuss this phenomenon, we capitalize on the concept of motor intentionality in plants and on available theories concerned to motor cognition. We suggest how they could be revisited to explain the intentionality component inherent in plant life and other brainless organisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

In this essay, the author explores the question of why distractions sometimes aid self-control. In a study with chimpanzees, Evans and Beran (2007) used two conditions with toys to address the possibility raised by Mueller et al. (2023) about toys as distractors. In the first, the accumulating rewards were within reach, and so chimpanzees had to inhibit taking rewards if more were to accumulate. The second condition was essential to this issue, as in that case toys also were available, but the delayed reward was out of reach (i.e., the chimpanzees were forced to wait to get the delayed reward). Because these trial types were intermixed, an explanation of the toys' effectiveness through conditioned association with the delayed reward would predict that the chimpanzees should have engaged the toys equally often in both conditions. However, three of four chimpanzees engaged the toys more when the accumulating reward was within reach compared to when it was not. Evans and Beran suggested that engagement with distractors in that study occurred when it was functionally effective in aiding delayed gratification, not solely as a result of toys being associated with delayed rewards, and thus was a cognitively controlled decision by the chimpanzees. The results of Evans and Beran (2007) have yet to be replicated in any other primate species. But, Mueller et al. (2023) noted that a study with a parrot (Koepke et al., 2015) showed that the parrot would use distractors and even move the smaller, sooner reward away from itself, perhaps matching the self-distraction techniques of children who hide their faces or talk to themselves. Thus, it remains to be determined whether those behaviors also can be explained by learned associations with reward or whether they reflect attention-based explanations. Mueller et al. (2023) have provided a creative experiment and a compelling argument that more careful analysis is needed of exactly what happens when an animal (or child) engages distractors and shows improved self-control, so that we can understand what role past reinforcement history may play and what possible attentional strategies or other cognitive strategies are at work in different self-control tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

In a successive delay-discounting task, a small reward can be obtained immediately but a larger reward can be obtained if one waits. There is evidence that the larger reward can be obtained more easily if one is "distracted" from obtaining the small reward. It is proposed here that a distractor stimulus may function as a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (sign tracking) because orienting to it may be directly associated with the larger reinforcer. In the present study with pigeons, we examined two successive procedures: (a) a peck to a red light resulted in one pellet of food, and waiting for the red light to turn off resulted in five pellets (Red-Only). (b) If the pigeon pecked a red light, it received one pellet of food, and if it waited for the red light to turn to green, a peck to the green light resulted in five pellets of food (Red-Green). For both groups, on some trials, a concurrent (distractor) stimulus appeared with the red light but responses to it had no programed consequence. Results indicated that the pigeons in both groups waited for the larger reward more often when the distractor was present than when it was absent and that pigeons in the Red-Only group waited longer than those in the Red-Green group. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the concurrent stimulus served as a conditioned stimulus for the Red-Only group and as a higher order conditioned stimulus for the Red-Green group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).