We describe an as yet unidentified bias relevant to comparative cognition research: WEIRD-centrism. This bias leads us to take as the gold standard the practices, capacities, or concepts of WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) humans, that is, humans who grew up in WEIRD societies and whose behavior has been shaped by the influence of WEIRD cultural norms and practices. We identify how the bias impacts the study of practices, capacities, and concepts, and offer two suggestions for mitigating the bias. The first is to use what we are calling a multibaseline approach, which involves starting with constructs that come not from our experiences as humans, but from our growing understanding of other species. The second is to make use of philosophical analysis and conceptual engineering, which includes identifying minimal concepts of psychological capacities as well as a dimensional approach that depicts the many ways in which a capacity can be instantiated. We hope that these tools will allow us to better understand the similarities and differences both within and between species. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
我们描述了一种与比较认知研究相关的尚未确定的偏见:怪异中心主义。这种偏见导致我们把WEIRD(西方的、受过教育的、工业化的、富裕的和民主的)人类的实践、能力或概念作为黄金标准,也就是说,在WEIRD社会中长大的人,他们的行为受到WEIRD文化规范和实践的影响。我们确定了偏见如何影响实践、能力和概念的研究,并提出了减轻偏见的两个建议。第一种方法是使用我们所谓的多基线方法,这种方法包括从不是来自我们作为人类的经验,而是来自我们对其他物种日益增长的了解的结构开始。第二种是利用哲学分析和概念工程,其中包括确定心理能力的最小概念,以及描述能力可以实例化的多种方式的维度方法。我们希望这些工具能让我们更好地了解物种内部和物种之间的异同。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Does comparative cognition have a WEIRD problem?","authors":"Kristin Andrews, Susana Monsó","doi":"10.1037/com0000423","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We describe an as yet unidentified bias relevant to comparative cognition research: WEIRD-centrism. This bias leads us to take as the gold standard the practices, capacities, or concepts of WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) humans, that is, humans who grew up in WEIRD societies and whose behavior has been shaped by the influence of WEIRD cultural norms and practices. We identify how the bias impacts the study of practices, capacities, and concepts, and offer two suggestions for mitigating the bias. The first is to use what we are calling a multibaseline approach, which involves starting with constructs that come not from our experiences as humans, but from our growing understanding of other species. The second is to make use of philosophical analysis and conceptual engineering, which includes identifying minimal concepts of psychological capacities as well as a dimensional approach that depicts the many ways in which a capacity can be instantiated. We hope that these tools will allow us to better understand the similarities and differences both within and between species. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144287137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Beatriz Felício, Beatriz Codogno, Carlene Gomes, Rafael Albuquerque, Patrícia Izar
Touch has a significant impact on the development of infant primates, but it is still understudied. Little is reported, for example, about the effect of infants' touch on their environment and social development. In this study, we sought to fill this gap by investigating the touch of capuchin monkey (Sapajus libidinosus) infants on the faces of other individuals in the group. We followed eight wild infants (four females and four males) across their first 3 years of life and assessed whether this behavior is part of the social repertoire and whether it facilitates facial recognition. We coded all social events of the infants in 127.3 hr of video recorded weekly from birth until 36 months, through daily focal sampling. We recorded motor patterns of the behavior, the context, the partner touched, and the partners' response to each infant face touching. We found that touching was always associated with affiliative contexts. Infant face touching of other group members was associated with lipsmacking and grooming, consistently involving visual contact and exploration of the face by the infant's hand. In this species, face touching also occurred in response to engagement initiated by the touched individual, potentially signaling reciprocity in affiliative interactions and serving as a pleasurable gesture. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
触觉对幼龄灵长类动物的发育有重要的影响,但它仍未得到充分的研究。例如,关于婴儿接触对他们的环境和社会发展的影响的报道很少。在这项研究中,我们试图通过调查卷尾猴(Sapajus libidinosus)婴儿对群体中其他个体面部的触摸来填补这一空白。我们跟踪了8只野生婴儿(4只雌性和4只雄性)的头3年生活,并评估了这种行为是否是社会技能的一部分,以及它是否有助于面部识别。我们通过每日焦点抽样,对婴儿从出生到36个月每周录制的127.3小时视频中的所有社交事件进行编码。我们记录了行为的运动模式,环境,伴侣的触摸,以及伴侣对每次触摸婴儿面部的反应。我们发现触摸总是与附属情境有关。婴儿触摸其他小组成员的脸与咂嘴和梳理有关,始终涉及视觉接触和婴儿的手对脸的探索。在这一物种中,触脸也是对被触碰个体发起的接触的反应,潜在地发出了亲密互动中的互惠信号,并作为一种愉快的姿态。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Touching faces: The active role of infant capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) in their social development.","authors":"Beatriz Felício, Beatriz Codogno, Carlene Gomes, Rafael Albuquerque, Patrícia Izar","doi":"10.1037/com0000420","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Touch has a significant impact on the development of infant primates, but it is still understudied. Little is reported, for example, about the effect of infants' touch on their environment and social development. In this study, we sought to fill this gap by investigating the touch of capuchin monkey (<i>Sapajus libidinosus</i>) infants on the faces of other individuals in the group. We followed eight wild infants (four females and four males) across their first 3 years of life and assessed whether this behavior is part of the social repertoire and whether it facilitates facial recognition. We coded all social events of the infants in 127.3 hr of video recorded weekly from birth until 36 months, through daily focal sampling. We recorded motor patterns of the behavior, the context, the partner touched, and the partners' response to each infant face touching. We found that touching was always associated with affiliative contexts. Infant face touching of other group members was associated with lipsmacking and grooming, consistently involving visual contact and exploration of the face by the infant's hand. In this species, face touching also occurred in response to engagement initiated by the touched individual, potentially signaling reciprocity in affiliative interactions and serving as a pleasurable gesture. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144095946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In humans, a mental state of flow--an interesting phenomenon driven by intrinsic motivation (e.g., Hintze & Yee, 2023) in which a state of settlement in an activity is perceived as rewarding--requires a careful balance between skill and challenge throughout the activity (van der Linden et al, 2021). A mental state of flow may also explain some animal activities such as, for example, some patterns of play (Burghardt, 2010; Held & Špinka, 2011; Hintze & Yee, 2023) or exploration for the sake of exploring (see interest; Kashdan et al., 2018; but not exploration to reduce anxiety states caused by knowledge gaps; e.g., Löewenstein, 1994). Perhaps most of all, it could help to explain some instances of contrafreeloading in animals. Contrafreeloading is defined as a preference to deliberately invest work to obtain an extrinsic reward that is also freely available (Inglis et al., 1997). Notably, to be explained by flow, contrafreeloading needs to remain challenging to the animal. In this issue, Carroll and Pepperberg (see record 2025-20600-001) present a new study targeting contrafreeloading in four captive umbrella cockatoos, a large species known for their loud calls and their flamboyant display routines. The almost antioptimal foraging tendencies of captive parrots led researchers around Pepperberg to study them as avian models for contrafreeloading (e.g., Inzlichet et al, 2018; Inglis et al, 1997, de Jonge et al, 2008, Tarte et al, 1973). In the current study, prior to testing, the four Ss received two deshelled nuts as a choice to determine possible side biases in their choices. All had some side preferences. Thereafter, they received a choice between a shelled and a deshelled almond. The results were individually quite variable with two birds preferring deshelled almonds over shelled almonds. Nevertheless, one bird, Poly preferred shelled almonds over deshelled almonds at 70%. Moreover, all of the others chose the shelled nuts at least sometimes (one other bird at 60%). This is remarkable considering that, according to optimal foraging theory, they should always go after the effortless option. Large interindividual differences and small samples made it hard to draw strong conclusions at this point. With more zoos, sanctuaries, and laboratories joining large collaborative projects, testing the play hypothesis and/or playful flow in contrafreeloading across species may become more feasible soon. Understanding intrinsically rewarding routines, such as contrafreeloading and flow, has great potential to inform us on the optimization of enrichment and welfare routines in large-brained animals and thus promises to remain an exciting topic in comparative psychology in the forthcoming years. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在人类中,心流的心理状态——一种由内在动机驱动的有趣现象(例如,Hintze & Yee, 2023),在这种状态下,一项活动中的解决状态被视为一种奖励——需要在整个活动中谨慎地平衡技能和挑战(van der Linden et al, 2021)。心流的心理状态也可以解释一些动物活动,例如某些游戏模式(Burghardt, 2010;举办& Špinka, 2011年;Hintze & Yee, 2023)或为了探索而探索(参见interest;Kashdan等人,2018;但不能通过探索来减少知识空白带来的焦虑状态;例如,Löewenstein, 1994)。也许最重要的是,它可以帮助解释动物体内的一些走私行为。契约负载被定义为有意投入工作以获得免费获得的外部奖励的偏好(Inglis等人,1997)。值得注意的是,用心流来解释,契约加载需要对动物保持挑战性。在这一期中,卡罗尔和佩珀伯格(见记录2025-20600-001)提出了一项针对四只圈捕伞凤头鹦鹉的新研究,这是一种以响亮的叫声和华丽的表演惯例而闻名的大型物种。圈养鹦鹉的觅食倾向几乎是反优化的,这使得Pepperberg周围的研究人员将它们作为契约负荷的鸟类模型进行研究(例如,Inzlichet et al, 2018;Inglis et al, 1997, de Jonge et al, 2008, Tarte et al, 1973)。在目前的研究中,在测试之前,四个s收到两个去壳的坚果作为选择,以确定他们的选择中可能存在的偏倚。所有人都有自己的偏好。之后,他们可以在去壳杏仁和去壳杏仁之间做出选择。结果各不相同,有两只鸟更喜欢去壳杏仁而不是去壳杏仁。然而,有一只鸟,Poly, 70%的人更喜欢去壳杏仁。此外,所有其他的鸟至少有时会选择带壳的坚果(另外一只鸟占60%)。考虑到根据最优觅食理论,它们应该总是选择不费力的选择,这是值得注意的。巨大的个体间差异和小样本使得在这一点上很难得出强有力的结论。随着越来越多的动物园、保护区和实验室加入大型合作项目,在跨物种的逆向负荷中测试游戏假设和/或游戏流可能很快就会变得更加可行。理解内在的奖励程序,如契约加载和流动,有很大的潜力告诉我们如何优化大型动物的富集和福利程序,因此有望在未来几年保持比较心理学的一个令人兴奋的话题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The best things in life are NOT for free! More on contrafreeloading in captive parrots.","authors":"Alice Auersperg","doi":"10.1037/com0000419","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In humans, a mental state of flow--an interesting phenomenon driven by intrinsic motivation (e.g., Hintze & Yee, 2023) in which a state of settlement in an activity is perceived as rewarding--requires a careful balance between skill and challenge throughout the activity (van der Linden et al, 2021). A mental state of flow may also explain some animal activities such as, for example, some patterns of play (Burghardt, 2010; Held & Špinka, 2011; Hintze & Yee, 2023) or exploration for the sake of exploring (see interest; Kashdan et al., 2018; but not exploration to reduce anxiety states caused by knowledge gaps; e.g., Löewenstein, 1994). Perhaps most of all, it could help to explain some instances of contrafreeloading in animals. Contrafreeloading is defined as a preference to deliberately invest work to obtain an extrinsic reward that is also freely available (Inglis et al., 1997). Notably, to be explained by flow, contrafreeloading needs to remain challenging to the animal. In this issue, Carroll and Pepperberg (see record 2025-20600-001) present a new study targeting contrafreeloading in four captive umbrella cockatoos, a large species known for their loud calls and their flamboyant display routines. The almost antioptimal foraging tendencies of captive parrots led researchers around Pepperberg to study them as avian models for contrafreeloading (e.g., Inzlichet et al, 2018; Inglis et al, 1997, de Jonge et al, 2008, Tarte et al, 1973). In the current study, prior to testing, the four Ss received two deshelled nuts as a choice to determine possible side biases in their choices. All had some side preferences. Thereafter, they received a choice between a shelled and a deshelled almond. The results were individually quite variable with two birds preferring deshelled almonds over shelled almonds. Nevertheless, one bird, Poly preferred shelled almonds over deshelled almonds at 70%. Moreover, all of the others chose the shelled nuts at least sometimes (one other bird at 60%). This is remarkable considering that, according to optimal foraging theory, they should always go after the effortless option. Large interindividual differences and small samples made it hard to draw strong conclusions at this point. With more zoos, sanctuaries, and laboratories joining large collaborative projects, testing the play hypothesis and/or playful flow in contrafreeloading across species may become more feasible soon. Understanding intrinsically rewarding routines, such as contrafreeloading and flow, has great potential to inform us on the optimization of enrichment and welfare routines in large-brained animals and thus promises to remain an exciting topic in comparative psychology in the forthcoming years. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"139 2","pages":"81-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144058269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1037/com0000394
Elizabeth L Haseltine, Maisy D Englund, James L Weed, Michael J Beran, Hollyn Tao, Sarah Paschal, Joseph R Mendelson
Maze studies have provided substantial information about nonhuman cognition, such as insights on navigational strategies, spatial memory, and choice discriminations. This knowledge can aid in how we understand the foraging strategies of many animals, particularly understudied and endangered species, such as the Guatemalan beaded lizard (Heloderma charlesbogerti). These actively foraging lizards rely on chemoreception to locate prey, but it is unknown to what extent they engage in olfaction and vomerolfaction to hunt and navigate their environment. We investigated how Guatemalan beaded lizards moved through a physical maze. When navigating an eight-arm radial maze with all arms baited, lizards tended to turn into the immediately adjacent arm in a single direction, similar to other reptiles that have been tested in radial arm mazes. In a T-maze, the lizards had to discriminate between arms that contained scent and no-scent from a distance. They were generally unable to choose the baited (correct) arm at levels greater than chance, indicating an inability for this discrimination. With the addition of a scent trail, however, all lizards chose the baited arm at levels significantly above chance, and this increased accuracy was correlated with increased latency to make the arm choice. The lizards also demonstrated a decreased rate of tongue flicking as proximity to reward increased. Guatemalan beaded lizards can efficiently navigate a radial arm maze and can successfully use vomerolfaction with substrate-borne cues to locate prey, but they appear to have minimal olfaction abilities when sensing from a distance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
迷宫研究提供了有关非人类认知的大量信息,例如有关导航策略、空间记忆和选择辨别的见解。这些知识有助于我们了解许多动物的觅食策略,尤其是研究不足的濒危物种,如危地马拉珠蜥 (Heloderma charlesbogerti)。这些积极觅食的蜥蜴依靠化学知觉来确定猎物的位置,但它们在多大程度上利用嗅觉和体视来捕食和导航环境还不得而知。我们研究了危地马拉珠蜥如何在物理迷宫中移动。当蜥蜴在所有臂都有诱饵的八臂径向迷宫中穿行时,它们倾向于沿着单一方向转入紧邻的臂,这与在径向臂迷宫中测试过的其他爬行动物类似。在T型迷宫中,蜥蜴必须从远处区分有气味的臂和没有气味的臂。它们通常无法选择有诱饵(正确)的手臂,这表明它们无法进行这种辨别。然而,在添加了气味线索后,所有蜥蜴选择有诱饵手臂的准确率都明显高于概率水平,而且准确率的提高与选择手臂的延迟时间的增加相关。蜥蜴还表现出,随着距离奖赏距离的增加,舌头弹动的频率也会降低。危地马拉珠蜥能够有效地在径向臂迷宫中导航,并能成功地利用体液嗅觉和基质传播的线索来确定猎物的位置,但在远距离感知时,它们的嗅觉能力似乎微乎其微。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Guatemalan beaded lizards (Helodermatidae: Heloderma charlesbogerti) navigate and follow a scent trail in maze tasks.","authors":"Elizabeth L Haseltine, Maisy D Englund, James L Weed, Michael J Beran, Hollyn Tao, Sarah Paschal, Joseph R Mendelson","doi":"10.1037/com0000394","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maze studies have provided substantial information about nonhuman cognition, such as insights on navigational strategies, spatial memory, and choice discriminations. This knowledge can aid in how we understand the foraging strategies of many animals, particularly understudied and endangered species, such as the Guatemalan beaded lizard (<i>Heloderma charlesbogerti</i>). These actively foraging lizards rely on chemoreception to locate prey, but it is unknown to what extent they engage in olfaction and vomerolfaction to hunt and navigate their environment. We investigated how Guatemalan beaded lizards moved through a physical maze. When navigating an eight-arm radial maze with all arms baited, lizards tended to turn into the immediately adjacent arm in a single direction, similar to other reptiles that have been tested in radial arm mazes. In a T-maze, the lizards had to discriminate between arms that contained scent and no-scent from a distance. They were generally unable to choose the baited (correct) arm at levels greater than chance, indicating an inability for this discrimination. With the addition of a scent trail, however, all lizards chose the baited arm at levels significantly above chance, and this increased accuracy was correlated with increased latency to make the arm choice. The lizards also demonstrated a decreased rate of tongue flicking as proximity to reward increased. Guatemalan beaded lizards can efficiently navigate a radial arm maze and can successfully use vomerolfaction with substrate-borne cues to locate prey, but they appear to have minimal olfaction abilities when sensing from a distance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"111-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1037/com0000395
Alana Carroll, Irene M Pepperberg
Contrafreeloading is defined as choosing to perform work to obtain a reward, despite the presence of an identical, freely available alternative. According to standard learning and optimal foraging theories, it should not exist. Thus, any evidence of such behavior is noteworthy. We briefly review the recently introduced play hypothesis, which proposes that contrafreeloading is more likely if the action involved is viewed as play rather than work (i.e., agreeable rather than aversive). One might consequently expect species that are relatively more playful to be more likely to engage in contrafreeloading. We evaluated this possibility by testing purportedly playful umbrella cockatoos (Cacatua alba); we studied four residents of a bird sanctuary in upstate New York (Dudley, JJ, Poly, and Teddy Bear). The task involved choosing between shelled and deshelled almonds; the former choice constituting evidence of contrafreeloading. We documented contrafreeloading in a novel species and then compared our results with previously published data on the reportedly less playful Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Individually, a higher percentage of cockatoos engaged in contrafreeloading on more than half the trials than did the Greys, with statistically similar levels of individual variation, but the overall amount of contrafreeloading was not statistically significantly different between the species at a group level. We discuss possible reasons for these findings. Additionally, we examine similarities in the behavioral expression of play and contrafreeloading. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
逆向觅食的定义是,尽管存在相同的、可自由选择的替代品,但为了获得奖励而选择工作。根据标准的学习和最佳觅食理论,这种行为是不应该存在的。因此,这种行为的任何证据都值得注意。我们简要回顾一下最近提出的 "游戏假说",该假说认为,如果所涉及的行为被视为游戏而非工作(即令人愉悦而非厌恶),则更有可能发生觅食反刍行为。因此,我们可能会认为,相对来说更喜欢玩耍的物种更有可能进行 "忌食"。我们通过测试据称贪玩的伞凤头鹦鹉(Cacatua alba)来评估这种可能性;我们研究了纽约州北部一个鸟类保护区的四只鹦鹉(Dudley、JJ、Poly 和泰迪熊)。任务包括在带壳杏仁和去壳杏仁之间做出选择;前者的选择构成了忌食的证据。我们记录了一种新物种的 "忌食 "行为,然后将我们的结果与之前发表的关于据报道不那么贪玩的灰鹦鹉(Psittacus erithacus)的数据进行了比较。就个体而言,在一半以上的试验中,凤头鹦鹉进行反食的比例高于灰鹦鹉,个体差异水平在统计学上相似,但在群体水平上,物种间反食的总体数量在统计学上没有显著差异。我们将讨论这些发现的可能原因。此外,我们还研究了玩耍和倒立的行为表现的相似性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Contrafreeloading in umbrella cockatoos (Cacatua alba): Further evaluation of the play hypothesis.","authors":"Alana Carroll, Irene M Pepperberg","doi":"10.1037/com0000395","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000395","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contrafreeloading is defined as choosing to perform work to obtain a reward, despite the presence of an identical, freely available alternative. According to standard learning and optimal foraging theories, it should not exist. Thus, any evidence of such behavior is noteworthy. We briefly review the recently introduced play hypothesis, which proposes that contrafreeloading is more likely if the action involved is viewed as play rather than work (i.e., agreeable rather than aversive). One might consequently expect species that are relatively more playful to be more likely to engage in contrafreeloading. We evaluated this possibility by testing purportedly playful umbrella cockatoos <i>(Cacatua alba</i>); we studied four residents of a bird sanctuary in upstate New York (Dudley, JJ, Poly, and Teddy Bear). The task involved choosing between shelled and deshelled almonds; the former choice constituting evidence of contrafreeloading. We documented contrafreeloading in a novel species and then compared our results with previously published data on the reportedly less playful Grey parrots (<i>Psittacus erithacus</i>). Individually, a higher percentage of cockatoos engaged in contrafreeloading on more than half the trials than did the Greys, with statistically similar levels of individual variation, but the overall amount of contrafreeloading was not statistically significantly different between the species at a group level. We discuss possible reasons for these findings. Additionally, we examine similarities in the behavioral expression of play and contrafreeloading. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"84-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1037/com0000393
Jennifer A D Colbourne, Léo Hanon, Irene M Pepperberg, Alice M I Auersperg
Many parrot species exhibit a high degree of limb lateralization on both the individual and species levels. In particular, the members of the cockatoo family are left-footed for food-holding at proportions reminiscent of right-handedness in humans. Here, we examine the limb lateralization of the Goffin's cockatoo (Cacatua goffiniana), a tool-using and technically proficient species used as a model of parrot cognition. First, we investigated the postural origins theory, originally proposed in primates to explain handedness. According to this theory, the hand that was used by ancestral primates to cling to trees developed finer motor control. Using a series of problem-solving tasks, we tested the possibility that the parrot's postural foot, which is similarly used to grasp tree branches, could be more motorically skilled. Although we did not find support for this idea, we did discover that task type does affect foot use, as subjects switched from using their food-holding dominant foot to their other foot during reaching tasks. We also found that the cockatoos more flexibly switched and used both feet when faced with more challenging tasks. Secondly, we attempted a partial replication of a previous study with parrots derived from the enhanced cognition hypothesis, which claimed that more lateralized individuals were better problem solvers. However, we did not find this relationship to be significant in any of our tasks. We did confirm that individual Goffin's cockatoos are extremely limb lateralized for food-holding in addition to other tasks, which may play a role in their approaches to problem-solving. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
许多鹦鹉物种在个体和物种层面上都表现出高度的肢体侧向性。尤其是凤头鹦鹉家族的成员,它们左脚拿食物的比例让人联想到人类的右撇子。在这里,我们研究了戈芬凤头鹦鹉(Cacatua goffiniana)的肢体侧向化,这是一种善于使用工具且技术熟练的物种,被用作鹦鹉认知的模型。首先,我们研究了姿势起源理论,该理论最初是在灵长类动物中提出来解释手性的。根据这一理论,灵长类祖先用来抓树的手发展出了更精细的运动控制能力。通过一系列解决问题的任务,我们测试了鹦鹉的姿势足(同样用于抓握树枝)在运动技能上更高的可能性。虽然我们没有找到支持这一观点的证据,但我们确实发现任务类型确实会影响脚的使用,因为在完成伸手任务时,受试者会从使用握住食物的优势脚切换到另一只脚。我们还发现,当面对更具挑战性的任务时,凤头鹦鹉会更灵活地切换并使用双脚。其次,我们尝试部分复制了之前对鹦鹉进行的一项研究,该研究源于增强认知假说,即侧向化程度越高的个体解决问题的能力越强。然而,我们发现这种关系在我们的任何任务中都不显著。我们确实证实,除了其他任务外,戈芬氏凤头鹦鹉个体在拿取食物时也具有极强的侧向性,这可能在它们解决问题的方法中起到了一定的作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Putting the best foot forward: Limb lateralization in the Goffin's cockatoo (Cacatua goffiniana).","authors":"Jennifer A D Colbourne, Léo Hanon, Irene M Pepperberg, Alice M I Auersperg","doi":"10.1037/com0000393","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many parrot species exhibit a high degree of limb lateralization on both the individual and species levels. In particular, the members of the cockatoo family are left-footed for food-holding at proportions reminiscent of right-handedness in humans. Here, we examine the limb lateralization of the Goffin's cockatoo (<i>Cacatua goffiniana</i>), a tool-using and technically proficient species used as a model of parrot cognition. First, we investigated the postural origins theory, originally proposed in primates to explain handedness. According to this theory, the hand that was used by ancestral primates to cling to trees developed finer motor control. Using a series of problem-solving tasks, we tested the possibility that the parrot's postural foot, which is similarly used to grasp tree branches, could be more motorically skilled. Although we did not find support for this idea, we did discover that task type does affect foot use, as subjects switched from using their food-holding dominant foot to their other foot during reaching tasks. We also found that the cockatoos more flexibly switched and used both feet when faced with more challenging tasks. Secondly, we attempted a partial replication of a previous study with parrots derived from the enhanced cognition hypothesis, which claimed that more lateralized individuals were better problem solvers. However, we did not find this relationship to be significant in any of our tasks. We did confirm that individual Goffin's cockatoos are extremely limb lateralized for food-holding in addition to other tasks, which may play a role in their approaches to problem-solving. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"98-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1037/com0000397
Mark A Krause, Caleb Koharchik, Lucas Staples
Surface chemical cues from prey elicit elevated levels of tongue-flicking and striking behavior in many species of snakes and lizards. These responses are mediated by the vomeronasal system, and they may even occur in the absence of other sensory cues. How individuals of a species respond to prey chemical cues can reflect developmental, ecological, and evolutionary processes. Our focus in this study was ecologically based, and involved testing whether levels of chemosensory responding reflect the putative relative intake of prey types in nature. We tested 11 wild-caught adult gopher snakes (Pituophis catenifer) for their chemosensory responses, namely tongue flicking, in response to surface chemicals of natural prey items (rodent and bird) and to two control stimuli (distilled water and hexane). On average the snakes had significantly higher rates of tongue flicking toward prey cues than to control stimuli (p = .001). Responses to rodent and bird surface chemicals did not significantly differ from each other (p = .35). Tongue-flick responses to rodent surface chemicals were significantly higher than to both water and hexane (ps < .01), while responses to bird surface chemicals were significantly higher than to water (p < .05) but not to hexane (p = .12). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Responses to prey chemical cues in wild-caught, adult gopher snakes (Pituophis catenifer).","authors":"Mark A Krause, Caleb Koharchik, Lucas Staples","doi":"10.1037/com0000397","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surface chemical cues from prey elicit elevated levels of tongue-flicking and striking behavior in many species of snakes and lizards. These responses are mediated by the vomeronasal system, and they may even occur in the absence of other sensory cues. How individuals of a species respond to prey chemical cues can reflect developmental, ecological, and evolutionary processes. Our focus in this study was ecologically based, and involved testing whether levels of chemosensory responding reflect the putative relative intake of prey types in nature. We tested 11 wild-caught adult gopher snakes (<i>Pituophis catenifer</i>) for their chemosensory responses, namely tongue flicking, in response to surface chemicals of natural prey items (rodent and bird) and to two control stimuli (distilled water and hexane). On average the snakes had significantly higher rates of tongue flicking toward prey cues than to control stimuli (<i>p</i> = .001). Responses to rodent and bird surface chemicals did not significantly differ from each other (<i>p</i> = .35). Tongue-flick responses to rodent surface chemicals were significantly higher than to both water and hexane (<i>p</i>s < .01), while responses to bird surface chemicals were significantly higher than to water (<i>p</i> < .05) but not to hexane (<i>p</i> = .12). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"147-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1037/com0000391
Michele M Mulholland, Will Whitham, Michael Berkey, Lisa M Pytka, Peter Pierre, William D Hopkins
Utilizing Automated Cognitive Testing Systems (ACTS) with group-housed nonhuman primates offers a number of advantages over manual testing and computerized testing of singly housed subjects. To date, ACTS usage has been limited to great apes or African monkeys. Here, we detail what we have learned while implementing ACTS with socially housed squirrel monkeys and rhesus macaques and provide information about the training process. In addition, we examined the effects of age on learning acquisition. We found age differences in learning for both squirrel monkeys and rhesus monkeys. Older monkeys were not as proficient as younger monkeys on learning to use the touch screens (squirrel monkeys only), discrimination learning (rhesus monkeys only; note: squirrel monkeys were not trained to criterion on this task), and recognition learning (both species). Overall, ACTS provide a number of advantages for studying cognition in socially living nonhuman primates and can be used to further investigate cognitive decline whether related to natural aging processes or disease pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
与人工测试和电脑测试单只灵长类动物相比,在群居非人灵长类动物中使用自动认知测试系统(ACTS)具有许多优势。迄今为止,ACTS 的使用仅限于类人猿或非洲猴。在此,我们将详细介绍我们在社会化饲养的松鼠猴和猕猴身上实施 ACTS 的心得体会,并提供有关训练过程的信息。此外,我们还研究了年龄对学习掌握的影响。我们发现松鼠猴和猕猴在学习方面存在年龄差异。在学习使用触摸屏(仅松鼠猴)、辨别学习(仅恒河猴;注:松鼠猴未在此任务中接受标准训练)和识别学习(两种猴子)方面,年龄较大的猴子不如年龄较小的猴子熟练。总之,ACTS 为研究非人类灵长类动物的认知能力提供了许多优势,并可用于进一步研究认知能力的衰退是否与自然衰老过程或疾病病理有关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Implementation of automated cognitive testing systems for socially housed rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and squirrel (Saimiri spp.) monkeys: Age differences in learning.","authors":"Michele M Mulholland, Will Whitham, Michael Berkey, Lisa M Pytka, Peter Pierre, William D Hopkins","doi":"10.1037/com0000391","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Utilizing Automated Cognitive Testing Systems (ACTS) with group-housed nonhuman primates offers a number of advantages over manual testing and computerized testing of singly housed subjects. To date, ACTS usage has been limited to great apes or African monkeys. Here, we detail what we have learned while implementing ACTS with socially housed squirrel monkeys and rhesus macaques and provide information about the training process. In addition, we examined the effects of age on learning acquisition. We found age differences in learning for both squirrel monkeys and rhesus monkeys. Older monkeys were not as proficient as younger monkeys on learning to use the touch screens (squirrel monkeys only), discrimination learning (rhesus monkeys only; note: squirrel monkeys were not trained to criterion on this task), and recognition learning (both species). Overall, ACTS provide a number of advantages for studying cognition in socially living nonhuman primates and can be used to further investigate cognitive decline whether related to natural aging processes or disease pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"124-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890186/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142301303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1037/com0000396
Bonnie Humphrey, Michelle Glass, Jonathan Hill, Amy J Osborne, Daniel B Stouffer, Alexandra Noble, William S Helton, Shuli Chen, Ximena J Nelson
Decreasing responsiveness to repeated visual stimuli (i.e., the inability to sustain attention) in jumping spiders (Salticidae) parallels that found in humans. In humans, drugs affect vigilance, and previous work on salticids has shown that the "vigilance decrement" is unlikely to be sensory habituation and that caffeine ameliorates reductions in attention. We exposed Trite planiceps to delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and methamphetamine before presenting them with a repeated visual stimulus. In the THC experiment, spiders were given a THC solution, water, or a vehicle solution, using a within-subjects design. The orienting response (i.e., "interest") of salticids on a track ball to face a fly stimulus presented peripherally on a monitor was scored, as well as "general movement" (e.g., walking, as a control for physical fatigue) and "no movement." The methamphetamine experiment was identical except that salticids were given methamphetamine solution or water. In both the THC and methamphetamine treatments, general movement dropped over time, while in control treatments, this was constant. Additionally, due to an initial stimulating effect of methamphetamine on interest, the response decrement was significantly steeper when spiders were administered methamphetamine compared with water. Our results suggest that the modulation of sustained attention, and possibly motivation, is likely in salticids. basic local alignment search tool genome queries on a closely related species and pharmacological radioligand experiments suggested that salticids do not possess cannabinoid receptors, but the presence of transient receptor potential proteins may help explain the small behavioral changes observed with THC. In contrast, how methamphetamine affects salticids remains unknown. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
跳蛛(跳蛛科)对重复视觉刺激的反应能力下降(即无法保持注意力)与人类相似。在人类中,药物会影响警觉性,而之前关于salticids的研究表明,“警觉性下降”不太可能是感觉习惯,而咖啡因可以改善注意力的下降。我们将平头肌暴露于δ -9四氢大麻酚(THC)和甲基苯丙胺中,然后给它们重复的视觉刺激。在四氢大麻酚实验中,蜘蛛被给予四氢大麻酚溶液、水或载体溶液,采用受试者内设计。在轨道球上的salticids面对周围监视器上的苍蝇刺激时的定向反应(即“兴趣”)以及“一般运动”(例如,行走,作为身体疲劳的控制)和“不运动”进行评分。脱氧麻黄碱实验是相同的,除了salticids被给予脱氧麻黄碱溶液或水。在四氢大麻酚和甲基苯丙胺治疗中,一般的运动随着时间的推移而下降,而在对照治疗中,这是恒定的。此外,由于甲基苯丙胺对兴趣的初始刺激作用,与水相比,甲基苯丙胺对蜘蛛的反应衰减明显更大。我们的研究结果表明,持续注意力的调节,以及可能的动机,很可能是在salticids。对一个密切相关物种的基本局部比对搜索工具基因组查询和药理学放射配体实验表明,salticids不具有大麻素受体,但瞬时受体电位蛋白的存在可能有助于解释四氢大麻酚观察到的小行为变化。相比之下,甲基苯丙胺如何影响salticids仍然未知。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The effect of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and methamphetamine on sustained attention in the jumping spider (Trite planiceps).","authors":"Bonnie Humphrey, Michelle Glass, Jonathan Hill, Amy J Osborne, Daniel B Stouffer, Alexandra Noble, William S Helton, Shuli Chen, Ximena J Nelson","doi":"10.1037/com0000396","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decreasing responsiveness to repeated visual stimuli (i.e., the inability to sustain attention) in jumping spiders (Salticidae) parallels that found in humans. In humans, drugs affect vigilance, and previous work on salticids has shown that the \"vigilance decrement\" is unlikely to be sensory habituation and that caffeine ameliorates reductions in attention. We exposed <i>Trite planiceps</i> to delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and methamphetamine before presenting them with a repeated visual stimulus. In the THC experiment, spiders were given a THC solution, water, or a vehicle solution, using a within-subjects design. The orienting response (i.e., \"interest\") of salticids on a track ball to face a fly stimulus presented peripherally on a monitor was scored, as well as \"general movement\" (e.g., walking, as a control for physical fatigue) and \"no movement.\" The methamphetamine experiment was identical except that salticids were given methamphetamine solution or water. In both the THC and methamphetamine treatments, general movement dropped over time, while in control treatments, this was constant. Additionally, due to an initial stimulating effect of methamphetamine on interest, the response decrement was significantly steeper when spiders were administered methamphetamine compared with water. Our results suggest that the modulation of sustained attention, and possibly motivation, is likely in salticids. basic local alignment search tool genome queries on a closely related species and pharmacological radioligand experiments suggested that salticids do not possess cannabinoid receptors, but the presence of transient receptor potential proteins may help explain the small behavioral changes observed with THC. In contrast, how methamphetamine affects salticids remains unknown. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"134-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142820378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Motivation influences essential behaviors for survival and well-being, driven by internal and external factors. By observing behaviors, we can understand motivational needs, decision-making processes, and preferences. Food acquisition is a survival motivator that covers a great part of daily activities, in contrast, play behavior shares a common basis with predation and social interactions. In the domestic cat, vocalizations, particularly the meow, are an acoustic signal expressing motivational and emotional states and are correlated to specific contexts, especially in cat-human interactions. This study investigated how contexts influenced meowing under two motivational conditions: feeding and play. Employing the synchronous citizen science approach, 48 guardians interacted with their cats as the researcher remotely recorded procedures involving presenting a feeder or toy and restricting access for 60 s. During the restriction periods, the cats could see and smell but not reach the stimulus. The condition influenced the frequency of meowing: they meowed significantly more in the feeding condition than in the play condition, suggesting a link between meowing frequency and the motivational context of eating, a crucial survival context. The food presentation likely influenced their motivation to vocalize. During feeding restriction, cats exhibited a significantly higher gazing at the guardian and gazing while meowing, suggesting the potential use of bimodal signals (visual and vocal) to enhance communication. In the play restriction condition, higher contact behaviors indicated a physical response to regain access, highlighting the play's social and motivational aspects. These findings help clarify contexts that motivate cats' vocalizations, aiding our understanding of their vocal communication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
动机影响生存和幸福的基本行为,受到内部和外部因素的驱动。通过观察行为,我们可以理解动机需求、决策过程和偏好。获取食物是一种生存动力,涵盖了日常活动的很大一部分,相比之下,游戏行为与捕食和社会互动有着共同的基础。在家猫中,发声,尤其是喵喵,是一种表达动机和情绪状态的声学信号,与特定的环境有关,特别是在猫与人的互动中。本研究调查了情境如何在两种动机条件下影响喵喵叫:喂食和玩耍。采用同步公民科学方法,48名监护人与他们的猫互动,研究人员远程记录了包括提供喂食器或玩具以及限制60分钟进入的过程。在限制期间,猫可以看到和闻到刺激,但不能到达刺激。这种情况影响了喵喵叫的频率:它们在喂食的情况下喵喵叫的频率明显高于在玩耍的情况下喵喵叫的频率,这表明喵喵叫的频率与进食的动机背景之间存在联系,这是一种至关重要的生存背景。食物的呈现可能影响了它们发声的动机。在喂食限制期间,猫对监护人的凝视和喵喵叫时的凝视明显增加,这表明猫可能使用双峰信号(视觉和声音)来加强交流。在游戏限制条件下,较高的接触行为表明了重新获得接触的身体反应,突出了游戏的社交和动机方面。这些发现有助于澄清激发猫发声的环境,帮助我们理解它们的声音交流。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Vocal signals produced by the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) in highly motivating contexts.","authors":"Naila Fukimoto, Natalia Albuquerque, Carine Savalli","doi":"10.1037/com0000418","DOIUrl":"10.1037/com0000418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motivation influences essential behaviors for survival and well-being, driven by internal and external factors. By observing behaviors, we can understand motivational needs, decision-making processes, and preferences. Food acquisition is a survival motivator that covers a great part of daily activities, in contrast, play behavior shares a common basis with predation and social interactions. In the domestic cat, vocalizations, particularly the meow, are an acoustic signal expressing motivational and emotional states and are correlated to specific contexts, especially in cat-human interactions. This study investigated how contexts influenced meowing under two motivational conditions: feeding and play. Employing the synchronous citizen science approach, 48 guardians interacted with their cats as the researcher remotely recorded procedures involving presenting a feeder or toy and restricting access for 60 s. During the restriction periods, the cats could see and smell but not reach the stimulus. The condition influenced the frequency of meowing: they meowed significantly more in the feeding condition than in the play condition, suggesting a link between meowing frequency and the motivational context of eating, a crucial survival context. The food presentation likely influenced their motivation to vocalize. During feeding restriction, cats exhibited a significantly higher gazing at the guardian and gazing while meowing, suggesting the potential use of bimodal signals (visual and vocal) to enhance communication. In the play restriction condition, higher contact behaviors indicated a physical response to regain access, highlighting the play's social and motivational aspects. These findings help clarify contexts that motivate cats' vocalizations, aiding our understanding of their vocal communication. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144056060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}