Journal of Advanced Nursing最新文献

Aim: To examine nurse workplace bullying relative to diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups.

Design: Observational cross-sectional study.

Methods: Using an annual organisational satisfaction survey from 2022, we identified free-text comments provided by nurses (N = 25,337). We identified and themed comments for specific bullying content among unique respondents (n = 1432). We also examined close-ended questions that captured organisational constructs, such as job satisfaction and burnout. We looked at differences by comparing diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups to the majority using both qualitative and quantitative data.

Results: For the free-text comments, themed categories reflected the type of bullying, the perpetrator and perceived impact. Disrespect was the most frequent theme with supervisors being the primary perpetrator. The reported bullying themes and workplace perceptions differed between nurses in the diverse gender identity and sexual orientation group compared to other groups. Nurses who reported bullying also reported higher turnover intent, burnout, lower workplace civility, more dissatisfaction and lower self-authenticity.

Conclusion: Diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups are understudied in the nurse bullying research, likely because of sensitivities around identification. Our design enabled anonymous assessment of these groups. We suggest practices to help alleviate and mitigate the prevalence of bullying in nursing.

Patient or public contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Impact: We examined differences in perceptions of nurse bullying between diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups compared to majority groups. Group differences were found both for thematic qualitative content and workplace experience ratings with members of minority groups reporting less favourable workplace experiences. Nurse leaders and staff can benefit from learning about best practices to eliminate bullying among this population.

Reporting method: STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional observational studies.

Aim: To investigate the perceptions of family members (FMs) of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and nurses on empowering support and its implementation during the acute phase within Finnish neurosurgical and neurological care in hospital settings, focusing on identifying similarities and differences in their viewpoints.

Design: Participatory qualitative descriptive study.

Methods: Data were collected from seven FMs and 11 nurses using the World Café method in November 2019. An abductive approach was employed for data analysis, combining deductive interpretation within the conceptual framework of empowering support and inductive content analysis.

Results: Four main themes were identified: (1) FMs' diverse information and guidance needs of TBI, treatment and its impact on family life, (2) support based on empowering FMs in participation, competence and decision-making, (3) empowering FMs through collaborative nursing practices and interprofessional support, and (4) internal and external hospital support enhancing and promoting the empowerment of FMs.

Conclusion: The perceptions of FMs and nurses regarding empowering support were largely consistent, yet diverged in its implementation in nursing practice. Nurses play a crucial role in fostering the empowerment of FMs; however, further research is needed to explore the impact of organisational and community factors on the implementation of empowering support.

Impact: Our study contributes to advancing nursing practices by underscoring the necessity for a paradigm shift towards a family-centred approach. Furthermore, it emphasises the urgency for standardising nursing practices to ensure equitable access to empowering support for FMs, applicable across various care settings for patients with TBI.

Public contribution: This review is part of a larger research project in which FMs of patients with TBI and nurses were involved in designing the project.

Reporting method: This study was reported using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Checklist for qualitative studies.

Aim: To identify, describe, and critically evaluate the effects of various interventions on diabetes management outcomes among Arabs with diabetes.

Design: A systematic review.

Data sources: The search was conducted across three databases: PubMed, CINAHL and the Cochrane Collaboration in December 2023.

Review methods: Screening involved randomised controlled trials and nonrandomised studies that focused on the effects of interventions on diabetes management among Arab with diabetes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist guided the review process. Two researchers independently applied eligibility criteria. Data extraction captured key study details, and methodological quality was assessed using Downs and Black's checklist. This review is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number CRD42024555668).

Results: Thirty-five articles were reviewed, yielding 65 outcomes. Effective interventions included personalised care, patient-centred education and direct patient contact through lifestyle modifications, advice, feedback, motivational conversations and calls. These approaches improved haemoglobin A1c, fasting blood glucose, physical activity and medication adherence. Conversely, nonpersonalised remote monitoring and social media interventions showed no significant improvements. Notably, tailored nutritional and physical activity advice positively impacted body mass index and systolic blood pressure among Arab women with diabetes.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the effectiveness of personalised care and direct patient contact in optimising diabetes management among Arabs with diabetes.

Impact: This review highlights the importance of prioritising direct patient contact over remote methods such as social media in interventions on diabetes management among Arabs with diabetes. It emphasises the need for culturally sensitive approaches, particularly for women.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution, as this study constitutes a review of existing research.

Aim: To comprehensively identify the status and influencing factors on maternal health literacy among postpartum women in Guangzhou urban villages.

Design: An explanatory sequential mixed-method research was conducted from November 2021 to July 2022.

Methods: The quantitative survey was conducted among postpartum women in Guangzhou urban villages using the convenience sampling principle, and a questionnaire survey was used to reflect the status and influencing factors on maternal health literacy. The qualitative interview conducted purposive sampling based on the survey and semi-structured interviews with women to supplement the non-quantifiable influencing factors.

Results: The quantitative survey showed that the maternal health literacy score of 501 women was 193.84 ± 22.23. The quantitative results suggested that ethnicity, education, income, household registration, delivery mode and social support were important influencing factors (p < .15). The qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 women and revealed three themes and eight sub-themes, including demographic factors (ethnicity, education, income, occupation and family history), pregnancy factors (delivery mode and pregnancy complications) and social factors (social support), which influenced maternal health literacy through three routes: women's motivation, access and ability in screening health information.

Conclusion: Maternal health literacy among postpartum women in urban villages needs to be improved, especially critical health literacy. Maternal and infant workers need to guide women to develop appropriate health information concepts and consider the realistic knowledge needs of women in different socio-cultural and economic backgrounds. They should also construct a comprehensive social support system for women to better improve maternal health literacy.

Impact: Highlights the positive benefits of maternal health literacy among postpartum women, as preparation for providing accurate and effective maternal and child health education services.

Patient or public contribution: The information on maternal health literacy in this study was based on an interview with postpartum women in Guangzhou urban villages during the study period.

Aim: To conduct a comprehensive review of Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Curricula leading to registration in Ireland.

Design: A mixed methods approach using a curriculum evaluation framework that was underpinned by the philosophy and principles of appreciative inquiry.

Methods: Five separate workstreams completed an evaluation of national policy documents and international curriculum documents, a literature review and two phases of stakeholder engagement including a graduate survey and peer-grouped stakeholder focus groups. The workstreams were emulated for the professions of nursing and midwifery.

Results: National policy indicates a significant shift in healthcare delivery to the community environment, with a strong focus on the social determinants of health and a flexible interprofessional workforce. International curricula review revealed that nursing and midwifery education was split equally between academia and clinical practice at bachelor's degree level. Graduates were assessed for clinical competence with a variance of four to seven domains of competence evident for nurses and five principles for midwives. Direct entry midwifery was not widely available. The graduate survey identified that students were satisfied with the academic components of the curriculum; however, significant challenges in clinical placement were reported. Stakeholder focus groups reported a need for a learner-focused approach to the curricula, increased access to education, a deeper understanding and appreciation of the various roles required to educate nurses and midwives and a recognition of midwifery as a separate profession.

Conclusion: There is a need for a significant revision of the current nursing and midwifery curricula to meet the future healthcare needs of the diverse patient population with a community-focused delivery.

Reporting method: The good reporting of a mixed methods study was used to guide the development of this manuscript.

Patient or public contribution: An Expert Advisory Group (EAG) was appointed to oversee the conduct of the research project and advise the research team as requested. There were five service user representatives included in the membership of the EAG. This included one representative from each of the divisions of the nursing and midwifery register in Ireland. A separate stakeholder engagement focus group was also conducted for the research upon the request from the service users.

Background: Research identified preliminary evidence that artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, revolutionising various aspects of healthcare delivery, from diagnostics to treatment planning. However, integrating AI into healthcare systems in Egypt is challenging, particularly concerning healthcare professionals' acceptance and adoption of these technologies. This mixed-method study aimed to explore the sentiment of nurses at different organisational levels towards AI and resistance to change in healthcare organisations.

Methods: A mixed-method design was employed, with quantitative data collected through a survey of 500 nurses using the general attitudes towards AI and resistance to change scale and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 17 nurses. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analysed thematically.

Results: The survey demonstrated that positive attitudes were inversely correlated with resistance behaviour and resistance to change. Additionally, perceptions of AI's usefulness, ease of use and value were strongly and positively correlated with positive attitudes and negatively correlated with negative attitudes. Moreover, the influence of colleagues' opinions, self-efficacy for change and organisational support showed significant positive correlations with positive attitudes towards AI and negative correlations with negative attitudes. Qualitatively, nurses cited obstacles such as lack of familiarity with AI technologies, biases affecting decision-making, technological challenges, inadequate training and fear of technology replacing human interaction. Readiness for AI integration was associated with the necessity of training and the timing of AI use.

Conclusion: Nurses demonstrated varied understanding of AI's applications and benefits. Some acknowledged its potential for efficiency and time-saving, while others highlighted a need for up-to-date knowledge.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Aim: To assess the level of stress of conscience experienced by Polish nurses and midwives and its determinants.

Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study.

Methods: The study was conducted from March 2019 to December 2020 and included convenience sampling of nurses and midwives working in hospitals in south-eastern Poland. An adapted version of the stress of the conscience questionnaire was used.

Results: A total of 476 nurses and midwives completed the survey. The stress of conscience mean value was 67.57. There were no differences in stress of conscience between nurses and midwives. There were five predictors of stress of conscience for nurses: additional job, place of residence, care for patients over 65 years of age, satisfaction with one's salary and having specialised courses, for midwives: social status, work mode and postgraduate studies.

Conclusion: With the knowledge of predictors of stress of conscience, educational institutions, policymakers and hospital managers should focus their interventions on the factors that lead to a higher level of stress of conscience. It is essential to provide psychological support, building positive relationships between colleagues and focusing on organisational conditions.

Implict: Further research in this area is therefore encouraged, along with pre- and postgraduate training in coping with challenging situations such as the death of a patient and caring for elderly patients with dementia or multiple diseases. The study identifies predictors of stress of conscience and problems that can influence their appearance. Factors that increase the stress of conscience, such as organisational conditions and caring after patients are over age 65, should receive special attention in clinical education and result in the provision of an increased level of support from supervisors. Policymakers should also direct their future actions towards the ageing population, staff shortages, the resignation from the profession by improving working conditions and reducing the stress of conscience.

Reporting method: STROBE guidelines.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Aim: Present a study protocol investigating the biobehavioral efficacy of side-lying vs. supine positions on physiologic and behavioural responses of preterm infants during their transition from tube to full oral feeding, and identify associated infant characteristics.

Design: Within-subject cross-over design.

Methods: Sixty preterm infants born at ≤35 weeks gestational age (GA) from a level 3 NICU are observed during their transition to full oral feeding. Each undergoes two feedings within 24 h: One in the supine position and one in the side-lying position. Continuous physiologic and video data are collected 30 min before and after feeding. Physiologic measures include heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and autonomic nervous system regulation (heart rate variability and splanchnic-cerebral oxygen ratio). Behavioural responses are assessed via microanalysis of the sucking and breathing waveforms and videotaped feedings (Suck-breathe coordination and Early Feeding Skills assessment tool). Data are analysed using linear mixed-effects models. IRB was obtained in September 2021, with funding awarded by the National Institute of Nursing Research in July 2021.

Conclusion: This study will enhance our understanding of the effects of the side-lying position on preterm infant feeding, providing guidance for its clinical use as a feeding strategy.

Implications: Provides vital knowledge to guide evidence-based practices in enhancing oral feeding in preterm infants and inform future pivotal efficacy trials.

Impact: If effective, this intervention could significantly enhance the management of feeding challenges in preterm infants across neonatal care settings.

Reporting method: Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013.

Patient or public contribution: While direct parent involvement was not documented in our protocol, informal feedback on data collection procedures from parents was incorporated. Additionally, extensive engagement with healthcare professionals during study design addressed patient safety, logistical challenges, and ethical standards in NICU settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04942106; registered on 28 June 2021. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04942106.