Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery最新文献

Purpose: To analyze the association between patients' neighborhood level of socioeconomic disadvantage according to their Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and (1) delays between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and (2) concomitant knee injuries at the time of treatment.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who underwent an ACLR at a single academic institution between 2015 and 2021. Each patient's home address was mapped to obtain their ADI to determine their level of socioeconomic disadvantage. Patients were categorized by their ADI score into 3 groups: least disadvantaged (ADI scores 0-3), middle group (ADI scores 4-6), and most disadvantaged (ADI scores 7-10). Time-to-event multivariable Cox proportional-hazard analysis was used to assess the association between ADI groups and delays in ACLR while controlling for relevant demographic, clinical, and surgical variables. Additional multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed this relationship using clinically relevant time thresholds of 12 weeks and 6 months between the time of injury and ACLR.

Results: We identified 383 patients for inclusion. Patients in the most disadvantaged group had an increased incidence of concomitant meniscectomies performed at the time of ACLR for irreparable tears (51.5% vs 34.8% [least disadvantaged], P = .04). Multivariate analysis revealed patients in the most disadvantaged group were at significant risk of delayed ACLR (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.86; P = .04), with a 2.24 times risk of delays >12 weeks (95% CI, 1.13-4.44, P = .02), and a 2.36 times risk of delays >6 months (95% CI, 1.2-4.65, P = .01). Non-White race was similarly associated with significant risk of ACLR delays >3 (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.22-3.33; P = .006) and 6 months (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.06-2.95; P = .03).

Conclusions: Socioeconomically disadvantaged and non-White patients who sustain ACL tears are at a greater risk of delays in the time of injury to ACLR and for undergoing a concomitant meniscectomy.

Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Several mechanisms either support or decrease stability of the hip joint. Primary stability of the hip comes from bony coverage of the femoral head, influenced by acetabular version and femoral antetorsion. In addition, soft tissue structures such as the acetabular labrum, the ligamentum teres, and the hip capsule play a significant role in maintaining joint stability. Untreated hip instability may lead to pathological force transmission between the acetabular socket and femoral head, and subluxation resulting in osteoarthritis. Historically, pelvic and/or femoral osteotomies have been performed to increase hip stability and prevent joint degeneration. However, osteotomies do not address soft tissue instability or lesions of intra-articular structures, which could explain symptoms following bony correction. Furthermore, the rate of combined pathologies resulting in hip instability and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is high. Modern hip arthroscopy enables reconstruction and stabilization of soft tissue structures and the correction of bony pathologies caused by FAIS. Minimally invasive procedures can help avoid overtreatment and unnecessary risks associated with more invasive osteotomies. However, in cases of ongoing symptoms after arthroscopic treatment for mild instability, or for patients with severe dysplasia, concomitant PAO and arthroscopy can combine bony correction of a PAO with intra-articular therapies of hip arthroscopy.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the population of surgeons performing ACLRs in the United States and investigate the relationships between surgeon volume, career duration, and practice setting on surgical outcomes.

Methods: A large nationwide insurance database was queried for patients undergoing primary ACLR. Provider gender, degree type (allopathic vs. osteopathic), practice setting (academic versus private as defined by ACGME affiliation), surgeon volume per year, and career duration were obtained. Reoperations, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits were recorded. The relationships between surgeon-specific factors and postoperative outcomes were investigated through univariable and multivariable analyses controlling for patient factors such as age, gender and comorbidities.

Results: 54,498 patients underwent ACLR by 3,782 surgeons between 2015 and 2019 with a minimum 2-year follow up. 97.2% of the surgeons were male and 90.9% had an allopathic degree. Multivariate analysis controlling for patient variables including age, gender and comorbidities revealed surgeons with low yearly ACLR case volume demonstrated higher risk for revision ACLR while surgeons with high yearly case volume had lower revision ACLR rates (p = 0.02, p =0.003). Additionally, low case volume per year had higher rates of emergency department visits (p = 0.01). Early career surgeons had higher rates of both ACLR and non-ACLR arthroscopic reoperations (p < 0.001, p = 0.006) as well as increased emergency department visits (p <0.001). Academic affiliation was independently associated with greater non-ACLR reoperations (p < 0.001), emergency department visits (p = 0.007) and hospital readmissions (0.006).

Conclusion: Patients undergoing ACLR by early career surgeons and surgeons with low yearly ACLR case volume were at increased risk for revision ACLR and post-operative ED visits.

Purpose: To investigate the potential impact of preoperative semaglutide use (the active agent in Ozempic and Wegovy) on 90-day postoperative outcomes and 2-year rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: Patients with T2DM undergoing primary ARCR were identified from the PearlDiver database using administrative billing codes. Exclusion criteria included patients <18 years old; previous RCR; concurrent nonrotator cuff-related arthroscopic shoulder procedures; any traumatic, neoplastic, or infectious diagnoses within 90 days before surgery; and <90-days follow-up. Patients with T2DM using semaglutide within 1 year of ARCR ([+]semaglutide) were matched 1:4 with patients with T2DM who did not ([-]semaglutide) by age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, diabetes complications, obesity, tobacco, insulin, and metformin use. Occurrence of any adverse events (AAE), severe adverse events (SAE), and minor adverse events (MAE) within 90 days were compared by multivariable logistic regression. The 2-year retear was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared by log-rank test.

Results: There were 1,094 ARCR (+)semaglutide and 4,110 ARCR (-)semaglutide patients meeting inclusion criteria after matching. The incidence of AAE for the ARCR (-)semaglutide versus ARCR (+)semaglutide patients was 27.4% versus 11.0%, SAE was 10.5% versus 3.5%, and MAE was 22.0% versus 8.5%, respectively (P < .001 for all). ARCR (-)semaglutide patients had a greater odds ratio of AAE (3.65, P < .001) and SAE (3.62, P < .001), including surgical-site infection (2.22, P = .049), venous thromboembolism (3.10, P < .001), sepsis (3.87, P < .001), and cardiac events (3.96, P < .001), as well as greater odds of MAE (3.59, P < .001), including urinary tract infection (3.27), pneumonia (3.88), acute kidney injury (3.91), and emergency department visits (2.51) (P < .001 for all). In addition, (-)semaglutide patients revealed greater 2-year retear vs (+)semaglutide patients (18.3% vs 12.5%, respectively) (P < .001).

Conclusions: Preoperative semaglutide use for patients with T2DM undergoing ARCR was associated with decreased odds of minor and serious 90-day adverse events and lower 2-year rotator cuff retear.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Suture augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has the potential to combine improved long-term stability and high functional outcomes with accelerated rehabilitation, enhancing the biomechanical properties of the graft, and reducing the risk of graft failure, particularly during the critical early phases of rehabilitation. Suture augmentation, applied to either ACL reconstruction or to primary repair, introduces a "safety belt" synergistically sharing loads acting on the graft or repair. Several biomechanical studies utilizing different autologous grafts for ACL reconstruction, as well as studies on ACL repair, have demonstrated that suture augmentation enhances strength and prevent elongation of the graft or ligament. Suture augmentation can protect the graft-brace integrity under loads of 350N, and reduces cyclic displacement by up to 31% compared to conventional ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft. Perhaps, as above, the greatest advantage of suture augmentation is allowing early rehabilitation. Assuming successful ligamentization of the graft, the graft itself should stabilize the knee joint, thereby diminishing the long-term benefit of suture augmentation. In practice, we utilize suture augmentation to support immediate postoperative mobilization and weight-bearing, enabling safe and early rehabilitation, while minimizing the risk of failure. With regard to the oft-mentioned risk of over-constraint, this is not supported by biomechanical studies or clinical experience. Recent introduction of collagen co-braid sutures for suture augmentation offer two distinct advantages: first, potentially improved biocompatibility, and second, gradual biological integration allowing suture degradation over time.

Purpose: To systematically review the literature to determine potential risk factors for failure of hip arthroscopy (HA) in patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD).

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify English language clinical studies reporting on patients with BHD undergoing HA from 2003 to 2023. The search terms used were: (borderline OR mild) AND hip AND (arthroscopy OR dysplasia) AND failure. The primary outcomes assessed were risk factors reported by each study for failure of a HA-only approach in BHD patients.

Results: Fourteen studies (8 level III, 6 level IV) met inclusion criteria, totaling 749 hips. Patient age ranged from 29.8 to 39.2 years with a mean follow-up ranging from 24.0 to 144.0 months. The overall percentage of females ranged from 11.8 to 100.0%. Overall, the clinical failure rate ranged from 0 to 53.3% and the reoperation rate ranged from 0 to 44.0%. The predominant predictors of poor outcomes following HA alone included Tönnis angle ≥ 15°, age ≥ 40-42 years at surgery, and female sex. Other risk factors for failure were preoperative clinical arthritis, grade 3 or 4 articular cartilage changes to the femoral head or acetabulum, an anterior wall index (AWI) < 0.35, and labral debridement. Revision procedures performed included revision HA (n=88, 0-28.0%), total hip arthroplasty (n=55, 0-23.7%), and endoscopic shelf acetabuloplasty (n=5, 0-11.0%). One study included an additional 9 patients converting to either PAO or total hip arthroplasty (THA) without distinguishing between the two.

Conclusion: For patients with BHD, Tönnis angle ≥ 15°, age ≥ 40-42 years at surgery, female sex, AWI < 0.35, labral debridement, and preexisting hip osteoarthritis are common risk factors for treatment failure following isolated HA.

Level of evidence: IV, systematic review of level III-IV studies.

While artificial intelligence (AI) technologies like ChatGPT have demonstrated very real and powerful capabilities to date, this does not mean that research studying these technologies is immune from "shiny object" syndrome, a psychological phenomenon where we tend to focus on new and fashionable ideas only to be distracted from those that truly matter. In parallel with the increased publicity that AI has received since the release of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT has been an explosion in the number of studies evaluating LLMs' ability to answer hypothetical questions from patients on a variety of conditions. Nevertheless, these studies tend to leave us with the same conclusion: LLMs are generally capable of providing reliable and relevant responses to patient questions but are not without limitations. Given the abundance of studies demonstrating similar outcomes regardless of whether the LLMs are asked to respond to a patient's questions about their diabetes or about their shoulder dislocation, I'm afraid we are at risk of making AI more of a "shiny object" than a tool that can be used to change clinical practice and improve patient care. Specifically, we may be getting to a point where a "publish or perish" mindset has promoted studies with repetitive methodologies that only confirm well-established theories around the capabilities and limitations of AI and has created a distraction from new use-cases and more meaningful applications for patient care. We are now at a crossroads where we can either remain stuck in the past, repeating old studies' methodologies on a different procedure or injury, or progress by expanding the number and impact of applications these tools have in orthopaedic surgery. The capabilities of AI will continue to increase at rapid pace, but it will be up to those with intricate knowledge of orthopaedics and patient care to keep up.

Purpose: To investigate the return to sport (RTS) rate and the sex-based difference of collegiate athletes following arthroscopic treatment for FAI.

Method: Patients who were collegiate athletes at the time of surgery and underwent hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI between January 2009 and June 2020 were included. Patients were excluded if they were in their final year of eligibility, graduated, retired, or had plans to retire from collegiate play prior to surgery. Publicly available data was collected regarding each patient's collegiate team and division, and RTS status after surgery. Comparisons were made based on the RTS status and gender.

Results: Of the 181 hips (144 athletes) who met the inclusion criteria, 114 were male (63%) and 67 female (37%) hips with a median age of 20.4 (Range: 18.0-24.5). Eighty-six percent (155 hips) returned to sport at the collegiate level following hip arthroscopy. Males were significantly less likely to return to sport compared to females (82% vs 93%, OR = 2.8, 95% CI [1.003, 7.819], p=0.042). Males participated in more contact sports (26% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001) and had more mixed-type FAI (95.6% vs 80.6%, P=0.003) compared to females. In addition, males had more grade 3/4 chondral defects (28% vs 13%, p=0.023) and underwent microfracture more frequently (11% vs 3%, p=0.047). Further, males had significantly larger postoperative alpha angles (46.2 vs 43.6, p< .001).

Conclusion: Collegiate athletes were found to have a high return to sport rate of 86% following arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI, however, males were less likely to return to sport compared to females. Sex-based differences were identified in the type of sports, type of FAI, prevalence of severe cartilage damage, and postoperative alpha angle.

Level of evidence: Retrospective case series, Level IV.