首页 > 最新文献

Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Knee Brace Application Does Not Affect Thigh Muscle Strength and Knee Range of Motion After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 膝关节支架应用不影响前交叉韧带重建后大腿肌肉力量和膝关节活动范围:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.042
Po-Han Chen M.D. , Sung Huang Laurent Tsai M.D., M.P.H. , Cheng-Pang Yang M.D. , Hao-Che Tang M.D. , Joe Chih-Hao Chiu M.D., Ph.D. , Yi-Sheng Chan M.D. , Chieh-An Chuang M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of rehabilitative knee bracing on thigh muscle strength, knee mobility, subjective and objective performance, knee stability, and functional test outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

In line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered with INPLASY, we included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing knee bracing versus no bracing after ACL reconstruction. Outcome measures were collected preoperatively and at defined study intervals of each study. Primary outcomes were thigh muscle strength and knee mobility, while secondary outcomes included International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner score, Lysholm score, visual analog scale for pain, knee anterior laxity, and the 1-legged hop test. Data were collected from multiple databases and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, with bias assessed via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Fourteen studies with 1,199 patients were included, with follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 4 years. Knee bracing showed no significant effect on isokinetic flexion (standardized mean difference [SMD] = –0.027; P = .935; 4 studies) or extension torque (SMD = –0.007; P = .980; 4 studies) within 2 years, flexion range of motion within 3 months (SMD = –0.001; P = .997; 4 studies), or extension deficits within 3 months (SMD = 0.355; P = .334; 3 studies) and 2 years (SMD = –0.439; P = .132; 3 studies). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant group differences.

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that rehabilitative bracing after ACL reconstruction did not result in significant differences in thigh muscle strength or knee range of motion compared to nonbracing protocols. On the other hand, no significant differences were observed between the brace and nonbrace groups in terms of stability and functional outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis of Level I-III studies.
目的:评价康复性膝支具对前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后大腿肌力、膝关节活动度、主客观表现、膝关节稳定性和功能测试结果的影响。方法:根据PRISMA指南并在INPLASY注册,我们纳入了随机对照试验和队列研究,比较了前交叉韧带重建后膝关节支撑与不支撑。在每个研究的术前和确定的研究间隔收集结果测量值。主要结果是大腿肌肉力量和膝关节活动度,次要结果包括IKDC评分、Tegner评分、Lysholm评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表、膝关节前侧松弛度和单腿跳跃测试。数据收集自多个数据库,采用综合meta分析软件进行分析,偏倚评估采用Cochrane ROB 2.0工具和Newcastle-Ottawa量表。结果:纳入14项研究,1199例患者,随访时间从2周到4年不等。膝关节支具对2年内的等动屈曲(SMD: -0.027; p = 0.935; 4项研究)、2年内的屈曲力矩(SMD: -0.007; p = 0.980; 4项研究)、3个月内的屈曲ROM (SMD: -0.001; p = 0.997; 4项研究)、3个月内(SMD: 0.355; p = 0.334; 3项研究)和2年内(SMD: -0.439; p = 0.132; 3项研究)均无显著影响。次要结果也没有明显的组间差异。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,与非支具方案相比,ACL重建后的康复支具在大腿肌肉力量或膝关节活动范围方面没有显著差异。另一方面,在稳定性和功能结果方面,支架组和非支架组之间没有明显差异。证据水平:III级:1、2级随机对照试验和2、3级队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
{"title":"Knee Brace Application Does Not Affect Thigh Muscle Strength and Knee Range of Motion After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Po-Han Chen M.D. ,&nbsp;Sung Huang Laurent Tsai M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Cheng-Pang Yang M.D. ,&nbsp;Hao-Che Tang M.D. ,&nbsp;Joe Chih-Hao Chiu M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Yi-Sheng Chan M.D. ,&nbsp;Chieh-An Chuang M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.042","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the effect of rehabilitative knee bracing on thigh muscle strength, knee mobility, subjective and objective performance, knee stability, and functional test outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered with INPLASY, we included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing knee bracing versus no bracing after ACL reconstruction. Outcome measures were collected preoperatively and at defined study intervals of each study. Primary outcomes were thigh muscle strength and knee mobility, while secondary outcomes included International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner score, Lysholm score, visual analog scale for pain, knee anterior laxity, and the 1-legged hop test. Data were collected from multiple databases and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, with bias assessed via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen studies with 1,199 patients were included, with follow-up ranging from 2 weeks to 4 years. Knee bracing showed no significant effect on isokinetic flexion (standardized mean difference [SMD] = –0.027; <em>P</em> = .935; 4 studies) or extension torque (SMD = –0.007; <em>P</em> = .980; 4 studies) within 2 years, flexion range of motion within 3 months (SMD = –0.001; <em>P</em> = .997; 4 studies), or extension deficits within 3 months (SMD = 0.355; <em>P</em> = .334; 3 studies) and 2 years (SMD = –0.439; <em>P</em> = .132; 3 studies). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant group differences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that rehabilitative bracing after ACL reconstruction did not result in significant differences in thigh muscle strength or knee range of motion compared to nonbracing protocols. On the other hand, no significant differences were observed between the brace and nonbrace groups in terms of stability and functional outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis of Level I-III studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5321-5331.e23"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145056339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Commentary: Posterior Shoulder Instability in Athletes: Durable Recovery May Be Achievable With Arthroscopic Management 运动员后肩不稳:通过关节镜治疗可实现持久恢复。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.09.003
Jeffrey Kay M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C., Olufemi R. Ayeni M.D., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.C.
Posterior shoulder instability, once considered rare, is increasingly recognized in young and athletic populations. Arthroscopic stabilization techniques have shown favorable outcomes with improvements in pain, function, and return to sport. Although most available evidence has been limited to short-term follow-up, emerging data suggest that arthroscopic management offers durable protection against recurrent instability and sustained athletic participation. The challenge remains in accurate diagnosis and patient selection, but advances in surgical technique and rehabilitation continue to refine outcomes. Posterior shoulder instability should no longer be viewed as an uncommon or unpredictable entity; rather, with modern arthroscopic management, it represents a condition where reliable and lasting recovery may be achievable.
后肩不稳,曾经被认为是罕见的,在年轻人和运动人群中越来越被认识到。关节镜下稳定技术在改善疼痛、功能和恢复运动方面显示出良好的效果。尽管大多数现有证据仅限于短期随访,但新出现的数据表明,关节镜治疗可提供持久的保护,防止复发性不稳定和持续的运动参与。准确的诊断和患者选择仍然是挑战,但手术技术和康复的进步继续改善结果。后肩不稳不应再被视为一种罕见或不可预测的实体,相反,通过现代关节镜治疗,它代表了一种可以实现可靠和持久恢复的情况。
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Posterior Shoulder Instability in Athletes: Durable Recovery May Be Achievable With Arthroscopic Management","authors":"Jeffrey Kay M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.,&nbsp;Olufemi R. Ayeni M.D., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.C.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Posterior shoulder instability, once considered rare, is increasingly recognized in young and athletic populations. Arthroscopic stabilization techniques have shown favorable outcomes with improvements in pain, function, and return to sport. Although most available evidence has been limited to short-term follow-up, emerging data suggest that arthroscopic management offers durable protection against recurrent instability and sustained athletic participation. The challenge remains in accurate diagnosis and patient selection, but advances in surgical technique and rehabilitation continue to refine outcomes. Posterior shoulder instability should no longer be viewed as an uncommon or unpredictable entity; rather, with modern arthroscopic management, it represents a condition where reliable and lasting recovery may be achievable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5056-5057"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Favorable Short-Term Outcomes of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review 基质相关自体软骨细胞植入(MACI)治疗距骨骨软骨病变的短期疗效:系统综述。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.045
Jimmy Wen B.A. , Burhaan Syed B.S. , Ubaid Ansari B.S. , Vince Thomas B.S. , Mouhamad Shehabat B.S. , Muzammil Akhtar B.S. , Daniel Razick B.S. , Christopher D. Kreulen M.D., M.S.

Purpose

To synthesize the available research on matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) by specifically focusing on clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), return to activity/sport (RTA/RTS), and rates of complications/revisions.

Methods

A search following the guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was performed in three databases for studies including MACI repair for OLTs. Study variables included title, author, publication date, study year, number of patients/ankles, mean age, mean follow-up time, RTA/RTS, PROs, and rates of complications/revisions.

Results

In total, 11 studies including 166 patients who underwent MACI with an age range of 17.7 to 45.8 years, a defect size range of 1.21 to 3.4 cm2, and a follow-up time of 21.1 to 144 months were included. Lesions treated were classified as Outerbridge III-IV, Hepple 3-4, International Cartilage Repair Society III-IV, or chronic-type lesions. The mean preoperative ranges for American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) (9 studies) and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (1 study) were 36.9 to 70.1 and 62.4, respectively. The mean postoperative ranges for AOFAS (9 studies) and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (4 studies) were 78.3 to 95.3 and 62 to 83.8, respectively. Rates for RTA (1 study) and RTS (3 studies) were 81.8% and 50% to 82.4%, respectively. Complications and revisions ranged from 0% to 59% and 0% to 45%, respectively.

Conclusions

MACI for OLTs is associated with improved AOFAS scores and RTA/RTS rates at short-term follow-up. Reported complication and revision rates ranged from 0% to 59% and 0% to 45%, respectively. No included studies reported minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptom state, or substantial clinical benefit metrics, limiting the interpretation of patient-level clinical improvements.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
目的:本系统综述的目的是通过特别关注临床结果、患者报告结果(PROs)、恢复活动/运动(RTA/RTS)和并发症/修复率,综合基质相关自体软骨细胞植入(MACI)用于olt的现有研究。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)建立的指南,在三个数据库中进行搜索,包括MACI修复olt的研究。研究变量包括标题、作者、出版日期、研究年份、患者/踝关节数量、平均年龄、平均随访时间、RTA/RTS、PROs和并发症/修订率。结果:纳入11项研究,共纳入166例MACI患者,年龄17.7 ~ 45.8岁,缺损大小1.21 ~ 3.4 cm2,随访21.1 ~ 144个月。治疗的病变分为Outerbridge III-IV、Hepple 3-4、国际软骨修复学会(ICRS) 3-4或慢性型病变。术前American orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)(9项研究)和Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART)(1项研究)的平均范围分别为36.9 ~ 70.1和62.4。AOFAS(9项研究)和MOCART(4项研究)的术后平均范围分别为78.3 ~ 95.3和62 ~ 83.8。RTA(1项研究)和RTS(3项研究)的发生率分别为81.8%和50%至82.4%。并发症和改进率分别为0% - 59%和0% - 45% .结论:在短期随访中,OLTs的MACI与AOFAS评分和RTA/RTS率的提高有关。报道的并发症和翻修率分别为0% - 59%和0% - 45%。没有纳入的研究报告最小临床重要差异(MCID)、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)或实质性临床获益(SCB)指标,限制了对患者水平临床改善的解释。证据等级:IV,对love III-IV研究的系统评价。
{"title":"Favorable Short-Term Outcomes of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review","authors":"Jimmy Wen B.A. ,&nbsp;Burhaan Syed B.S. ,&nbsp;Ubaid Ansari B.S. ,&nbsp;Vince Thomas B.S. ,&nbsp;Mouhamad Shehabat B.S. ,&nbsp;Muzammil Akhtar B.S. ,&nbsp;Daniel Razick B.S. ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Kreulen M.D., M.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.045","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.045","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To synthesize the available research on matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) by specifically focusing on clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), return to activity/sport (RTA/RTS), and rates of complications/revisions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search following the guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was performed in three databases for studies including MACI repair for OLTs. Study variables included title, author, publication date, study year, number of patients/ankles, mean age, mean follow-up time, RTA/RTS, PROs, and rates of complications/revisions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 11 studies including 166 patients who underwent MACI with an age range of 17.7 to 45.8 years, a defect size range of 1.21 to 3.4 cm<sup>2</sup>, and a follow-up time of 21.1 to 144 months were included. Lesions treated were classified as Outerbridge III-IV, Hepple 3-4, International Cartilage Repair Society III-IV, or chronic-type lesions. The mean preoperative ranges for American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) (9 studies) and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (1 study) were 36.9 to 70.1 and 62.4, respectively. The mean postoperative ranges for AOFAS (9 studies) and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (4 studies) were 78.3 to 95.3 and 62 to 83.8, respectively. Rates for RTA (1 study) and RTS (3 studies) were 81.8% and 50% to 82.4%, respectively. Complications and revisions ranged from 0% to 59% and 0% to 45%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MACI for OLTs is associated with improved AOFAS scores and RTA/RTS rates at short-term follow-up. Reported complication and revision rates ranged from 0% to 59% and 0% to 45%, respectively. No included studies reported minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptom state, or substantial clinical benefit metrics, limiting the interpretation of patient-level clinical improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5492-5502.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145093082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to “Female Sex, Capsular Laxity, and Heightened Beighton Test Score, Femoral Torsion Angle, Neck-Shaft Angle Decrease Whereas Hip Inflammatory Disease and Capsular Repair Increase Hip Capsular Thickness: A Systematic Review [Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 41, No 9 (September), 2025: pp 3776-3788” “女性性别、关节囊松弛、高Beighton测试分数、股骨扭转角、颈轴角降低,而髋关节炎性疾病和关节囊修复增加髋关节囊厚度:一项系统综述”的更正[关节镜:关节镜与相关外科杂志,第41卷,第9期(9月),2025:3776-3788页]
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.11.002
Lin-Yi Shen M.M., Wei-Xing Li M.M., Kai-Zhe Chen M.D., Hong-Yun Li M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Female Sex, Capsular Laxity, and Heightened Beighton Test Score, Femoral Torsion Angle, Neck-Shaft Angle Decrease Whereas Hip Inflammatory Disease and Capsular Repair Increase Hip Capsular Thickness: A Systematic Review [Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 41, No 9 (September), 2025: pp 3776-3788”","authors":"Lin-Yi Shen M.M.,&nbsp;Wei-Xing Li M.M.,&nbsp;Kai-Zhe Chen M.D.,&nbsp;Hong-Yun Li M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.11.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Page 5506"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145718903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arthroscopic Iliac Crest Autograft Glenoid Augmentation Using Tape Cerclage Fixation for Bony Deficiency and Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability Improves Functional Outcomes and Achieves High Union Rates With Graft Resorption in Nonloaded Areas 关节镜下应用带子环扣固定治疗骨缺损和复发性前肩不稳的自体髂骨肩关节增强术改善了功能结果,并在非负荷区域实现了高愈合率的移植物吸收。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.042
Abdul-Ilah Hachem M.D. , Diego Gonzalez-Morgado M.D. , Gonzalo Barraza M.D. , Fernando Alvarado M.D. , Jose Luis Agullo M.D. , Christina Lorenz M.D. , Xavier Rius M.D. , Markus Scheibel M.D.

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcomes, return-to-sport rate, and graft remodeling after arthroscopic iliac crest bone autograft (ICBA) tape cerclage fixation for glenoid bone loss (GBL) in recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Methods

Case series of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability with GBL ≥15% who underwent arthroscopic ICBA metal-free tape cerclage fixation between February 2019 and March 2022 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, return to sport, instability recurrence, and complications were collected preoperatively and at postoperative follow-ups. Graft resorption mapping was assessed by evaluating the distribution of articular surface remodeling on sagittal computed tomography scans. The graft surface was divided in 2 columns: the inner (loaded) column and the outer (nonloaded) column.

Results

Twenty-eight patients with a mean age of 29.1 ± 7.9 years and a mean follow-up of 37.6 ± 5.8 months were included. The mean GBL was 18.4% ± 3.4% (range, 15%-25%). External rotation was 4° lower (P < .001) compared to the uninjured side. Patient-reported outcomes significantly improved from baseline to 2-year follow-up (P < .001): Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, 37.2 ± 18.7 to 94.9 ± 8.8; Rowe, 30.2 ± 16.4 to 96.1 ± 11.5; Constant-Murley, 83 ± 13.6 to 98.7 ± 3.2; and Subjective Shoulder Value, 43.5 ± 21.3 to 96.5 ± 8.3. Twenty-one patients (88%) returned to their previous sport level at a mean of 4.8 ± 1.7 months. No recurrent instability was reported. The glenoid surface area increased from 81.6% preoperatively to 120.1% immediately postsurgery (P < .001) and decreased to 101.2% at 1 year (P < .001) and to 98.2% at 2 years postoperative (P = .018). Graft resorption mapping showed higher osteolysis of the graft in the nonloaded area compared to the loaded area at 2 years postoperative (94.2% ± 12.9% vs 8.7% ± 15%, respectively, P < .001).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction using ICBA fixed with tape cerclage is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with GBL greater than 15% at short-term follow-up. The procedure shows a high union rate, with articular graft surface resorption predominantly affecting nonloaded areas.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective case series.
目的:本研究旨在评估关节镜下髂嵴自体骨(ICBA)带环固定治疗复发性前肩不稳的盂骨丢失(GBL)后的临床结果、恢复运动率和移植物重塑。方法:2019年2月至2022年3月期间,复发性肩前路不稳且GBL≥15%的患者接受了关节镜ICBA无金属带环固定,随访时间至少为2年。术前和术后随访时收集活动范围、患者报告结果(PROs)、恢复运动、不稳定复发和并发症。通过评估关节面重构在矢状位CT扫描上的分布来评估移植物吸收定位。接枝面分为两柱:内柱(加载)和外柱(未加载)。结果:纳入28例患者,平均年龄29.1±7.9岁,平均随访37.6±5.8个月。平均GBL为18.4%±3.4(范围15-25)。结论:关节镜下肩关节重建采用带环固定ICBA是一种安全有效的治疗复发性肩关节前不稳的短期随访GBL大于15%。该手术显示高愈合率,关节移植物表面吸收主要影响非负荷区域。证据水平:回顾性病例系列。证据等级iv:
{"title":"Arthroscopic Iliac Crest Autograft Glenoid Augmentation Using Tape Cerclage Fixation for Bony Deficiency and Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability Improves Functional Outcomes and Achieves High Union Rates With Graft Resorption in Nonloaded Areas","authors":"Abdul-Ilah Hachem M.D. ,&nbsp;Diego Gonzalez-Morgado M.D. ,&nbsp;Gonzalo Barraza M.D. ,&nbsp;Fernando Alvarado M.D. ,&nbsp;Jose Luis Agullo M.D. ,&nbsp;Christina Lorenz M.D. ,&nbsp;Xavier Rius M.D. ,&nbsp;Markus Scheibel M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.042","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div><span>To evaluate the clinical outcomes, return-to-sport rate, and graft remodeling after arthroscopic iliac crest </span>bone autograft<span> (ICBA) tape cerclage<span> fixation for glenoid bone loss<span> (GBL) in recurrent anterior shoulder instability.</span></span></span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span><span>Case series of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability with GBL ≥15% who underwent arthroscopic ICBA metal-free tape cerclage fixation between February 2019 and March 2022 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, return to sport, instability recurrence, and complications were collected preoperatively and at postoperative follow-ups. Graft resorption mapping was assessed by evaluating the distribution of </span>articular surface remodeling on sagittal </span>computed tomography scans. The graft surface was divided in 2 columns: the inner (loaded) column and the outer (nonloaded) column.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-eight patients with a mean age of 29.1 ± 7.9 years and a mean follow-up of 37.6 ± 5.8 months were included. The mean GBL was 18.4% ± 3.4% (range, 15%-25%). External rotation was 4° lower (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) compared to the uninjured side. Patient-reported outcomes significantly improved from baseline to 2-year follow-up (<em>P</em> &lt; .001): Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, 37.2 ± 18.7 to 94.9 ± 8.8; Rowe, 30.2 ± 16.4 to 96.1 ± 11.5; Constant-Murley, 83 ± 13.6 to 98.7 ± 3.2; and Subjective Shoulder Value, 43.5 ± 21.3 to 96.5 ± 8.3. Twenty-one patients (88%) returned to their previous sport level at a mean of 4.8 ± 1.7 months. No recurrent instability was reported. The glenoid surface area increased from 81.6% preoperatively to 120.1% immediately postsurgery (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and decreased to 101.2% at 1 year (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and to 98.2% at 2 years postoperative (<em>P</em> = .018). Graft resorption mapping showed higher osteolysis of the graft in the nonloaded area compared to the loaded area at 2 years postoperative (94.2% ± 12.9% vs 8.7% ± 15%, respectively, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction using ICBA fixed with tape cerclage is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with GBL greater than 15% at short-term follow-up. The procedure shows a high union rate, with articular graft surface resorption predominantly affecting nonloaded areas.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 4978-4990"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144027030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No Difference in Responders and Nonresponders to Preoperative Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at 10 Years: A Matched Analysis 10年股骨髋臼撞击综合征的髋关节镜术前关节内皮质类固醇注射反应者和无反应者无差异:一项匹配分析。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.013
Eric Y. Hu B.S., Jose Vega M.D., Jesus E. Cervantes B.S., Shane J. Nho M.D., M.S.

Purpose

To compare 10-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs), achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and reoperation-free survivorship between patients who responded to intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injections and those who had no response to IACS injections after contemporary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Methods

Retrospective review of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy between January 2012 and August 2014. Patients who received a preoperative IACS injection were divided based on whether they had symptomatic relief (responder group) or no relief (nonresponder group). Groups were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), acetabular cartilage grade, and Tönnis grade. Demographics, radiographics, CSOs, and survivorship were compared. PROs were measured preoperatively and up to the 10-year follow-up, which included Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, and visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction. Survivorship was also compared.

Results

Overall, 116 responder patients (age: 36.4 ± 11.4 years, 67.2% female, BMI: 25.4 ± 4.7) were matched to 116 nonresponder patients (age: 36.6 ± 12.8 years; 62.1% female; BMI: 25.4 ± 4.6) (70.4% follow-up). No differences between groups were seen between any demographic or radiographic findings. Preoperatively, the responder group had significantly lower visual analog scale for pain scores compared to the nonresponder group (68.4 ± 17.5 vs 74.4 ± 17.2, P = .006). Otherwise, both groups saw similar outcomes scores for all other PROs preoperatively and at the 2-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up. CSO achievement was also similar between groups, with ≥97.6% of all patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference and ≥78.8% achieving the patient acceptable symptom state for ≥1 PRO. Reoperation survivorship was also similar between groups (P = .62).

Conclusions

Response to IACS injection was not associated with differences in 10-year PROs, CSOs, or reoperation rates, despite lower preoperative pain scores in the responder group. While injections remain important tools in the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, our findings suggest that lack of relief after injection does not rule out the potential for successful long-term outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective, matched case-control study.
目的:比较当代髋关节镜治疗股髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)后,对关节内皮质类固醇(IACS)注射有反应的患者与对IACS注射无反应的患者10年患者报告的预后(PROs)、临床显著结局(cso)的实现以及无再手术生存率。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年8月间接受原发性髋关节镜检查的患者。术前接受IACS注射的患者根据症状缓解(反应组)或无缓解(无反应组)进行分组。各组根据年龄、性别、BMI、髋臼软骨分级和Tönnis分级按1:1的比例进行倾向匹配。比较了人口统计学、放射学、cso和生存率。术前和长达10年的随访测量了PROs,包括髋关节结局评分-日常生活活动(HOS-ADL)、运动量表(HOS-SS)、改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)和疼痛和满意度视觉模拟量表(VAS)。生存率也进行了比较。结果:总体而言,116例有反应患者(年龄:36.4±11.4,67.2%女性,BMI: 25.4±4.7 kg/m2)与116例无反应患者(年龄:36.6±12.8岁;62.1%的女性;BMI: 25.4±4.6 kg/m2)(70.4%随访)。在任何人口统计学或放射学发现之间,各组之间没有差异。术前,有反应组VAS-Pain评分明显低于无反应组(68.4±17.5 vs 74.4±17.2,P = 0.006)。除此之外,两组在术前、2年、5年和10年随访时,所有其他PROs的结果评分相似。CSO成绩在两组之间也相似,≥97.6%的患者达到MCID,≥78.8%的患者达到PASS。两组再手术生存率相似(P = 0.62)。结论:尽管反应组的术前疼痛评分较低,但IACS注射的反应与10年PROs、cso或再手术率的差异无关。虽然注射仍然是评估FAIS的重要工具,但我们的研究结果表明,注射后缺乏缓解并不排除髋关节镜术后成功长期预后的可能性。证据等级:III级,回顾性,匹配病例对照研究。
{"title":"No Difference in Responders and Nonresponders to Preoperative Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at 10 Years: A Matched Analysis","authors":"Eric Y. Hu B.S.,&nbsp;Jose Vega M.D.,&nbsp;Jesus E. Cervantes B.S.,&nbsp;Shane J. Nho M.D., M.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare 10-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs), achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and reoperation-free survivorship between patients who responded to intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injections and those who had no response to IACS injections after contemporary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective review of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy between January 2012 and August 2014. Patients who received a preoperative IACS injection were divided based on whether they had symptomatic relief (responder group) or no relief (nonresponder group). Groups were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), acetabular cartilage grade, and Tönnis grade. Demographics, radiographics, CSOs, and survivorship were compared. PROs were measured preoperatively and up to the 10-year follow-up, which included Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, and visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction. Survivorship was also compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 116 responder patients (age: 36.4 ± 11.4 years, 67.2% female, BMI: 25.4 ± 4.7) were matched to 116 nonresponder patients (age: 36.6 ± 12.8 years; 62.1% female; BMI: 25.4 ± 4.6) (70.4% follow-up). No differences between groups were seen between any demographic or radiographic findings. Preoperatively, the responder group had significantly lower visual analog scale for pain scores compared to the nonresponder group (68.4 ± 17.5 vs 74.4 ± 17.2, <em>P</em> = .006). Otherwise, both groups saw similar outcomes scores for all other PROs preoperatively and at the 2-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up. CSO achievement was also similar between groups, with ≥97.6% of all patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference and ≥78.8% achieving the patient acceptable symptom state for ≥1 PRO. Reoperation survivorship was also similar between groups (<em>P</em> = .62).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Response to IACS injection was not associated with differences in 10-year PROs, CSOs, or reoperation rates, despite lower preoperative pain scores in the responder group. While injections remain important tools in the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, our findings suggest that lack of relief after injection does not rule out the potential for successful long-term outcomes after hip arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective, matched case-control study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5137-5148.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144719213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Commentary: Stretching the Truth: We Need a Better System to Define Generalized Joint Laxity 延伸真理:我们需要一个更好的系统来定义广义关节松弛。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.013
Shane J. Nho M.D., M.S., Ty L. Monty B.S., Chandler A. Sparks M.S.
As the indications and utilization of hip arthroscopy continue to grow, understanding outcomes in unique patient populations is a popular area of research. A specific cohort of interest are those with generalized joint laxity, a group in which instability issues may already be present and of concern for hip arthroscopy. The Beighton score, the standardized scale used to measure joint laxity in patients, presents several issues for its use as a diagnostic indicator, including disagreement on cut-offs, limited focus on lower extremity joints, and questionable validity. Hip arthroscopy has outgrown the single-faceted system, with controversial evidence to characterize this complex group of patients.
随着髋关节镜的适应症和应用的不断增长,了解独特患者群体的结果是一个热门的研究领域。有广泛性关节松弛的患者是一个特别的研究对象,这类患者的不稳定性问题可能已经存在,需要进行髋关节镜检查。Beighton评分是用于测量患者关节松弛程度的标准化量表,它作为诊断指标存在几个问题,包括对临界值的分歧,对下肢关节的关注有限,以及有效性的质疑。髋关节镜已经超越了单一的面系统,有争议的证据来表征这一复杂的患者群体。
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Stretching the Truth: We Need a Better System to Define Generalized Joint Laxity","authors":"Shane J. Nho M.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Ty L. Monty B.S.,&nbsp;Chandler A. Sparks M.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.013","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the indications and utilization of hip arthroscopy continue to grow, understanding outcomes in unique patient populations is a popular area of research. A specific cohort of interest are those with generalized joint laxity, a group in which instability issues may already be present and of concern for hip arthroscopy. The Beighton score, the standardized scale used to measure joint laxity in patients, presents several issues for its use as a diagnostic indicator, including disagreement on cut-offs, limited focus on lower extremity joints, and questionable validity. Hip arthroscopy has outgrown the single-faceted system, with controversial evidence to characterize this complex group of patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5081-5082"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Commentary: How to Pass Go After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction 如何在强筋膜炎重建后通过。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.004
Brandon J. Erickson M.D.
Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) has been a reliable procedure to allow patients with patellar instability to regain function and minimize subsequent instability. However, although much of the prior literature has focused on recurrent patellar instability as a primary outcome after MPFLR, this may not accurately capture how a patient feels he or she has recovered after surgery. A more nuanced approach, taking into account patient-reported outcome scores, specifically the Kujala score, as well as the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state, may help orthopaedic surgeons better understand how patients evaluate their outcomes after MPFLR.
髌股内侧韧带(MPFL)重建(MPFLR)是一种可靠的手术方法,可以使髌骨不稳定患者恢复功能并减少随后的不稳定。然而,虽然先前的许多文献都将复发性髌骨不稳定作为MPFLR后的主要结果,但这可能无法准确地反映患者对手术后恢复的感觉。考虑到患者报告的结果评分(PROs),特别是Kujala评分,以及最小临床重要差异(MCID),实质性临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受的症状状态(PASS),一种更细致的方法可以帮助骨科医生更好地了解患者在MPFLR后的感受。
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: How to Pass Go After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction","authors":"Brandon J. Erickson M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) has been a reliable procedure to allow patients with patellar instability to regain function and minimize subsequent instability. However, although much of the prior literature has focused on recurrent patellar instability as a primary outcome after MPFLR, this may not accurately capture how a patient feels he or she has recovered after surgery. A more nuanced approach, taking into account patient-reported outcome scores, specifically the Kujala score, as well as the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state, may help orthopaedic surgeons better understand how patients evaluate their outcomes after MPFLR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5276-5277"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144862718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopic Free Bone Blocks With Alternative Fixation Are Likely the Wave of the Future but Further Research Is Necessary Before Widespread Adoption 社论评论:关节镜下游离骨块替代固定可能是未来的潮流,但在广泛采用之前需要进一步的研究。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.018
Albert Lin M.D. (Editorial Board), Ryan Gilbert B.A., Luilly Vargas M.D.
Recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone loss is a difficult problem with several surgical options. The Latarjet technique remains the gold standard for glenoid bone reconstruction in the setting of critical glenoid bone loss, with excellent long-term outcomes. However, this technique has well-known downsides including high rates of complications. Free bone blocks have become popular to overcome these limitations and are more flexible for restoring anatomy. Iliac crest bone autograft is a tried-and-true graft used worldwide, particularly in countries where allograft is cost prohibitive, and has shown great clinical results and instability recurrence rates similar to the Latarjet procedure. However, iliac crest bone autograft has also been associated with high rates of donor site morbidity. Alternative methods of fixation such as cortical buttons and tape cerclage are gaining popularity owing to reported risks of screw fixation, including hardware prominence and osteolysis, with mixed results in the literature compared with screws. In many cases, we believe the issues with screws develop as a result of oversized grafts that eventually remodel to the normal shape of the glenoid, leading to screw “prominence.” Nonetheless, screw fixation remains the gold standard for fixation. As more is learned of the complex interplay between humeral and glenoid bone loss, simply reconstructing the glenoid may not be enough to address the Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL), particularly if remodeling of the glenoid occurs over time. Regardless of technique, glenoid bone reconstruction should be sized to match the native glenoid, potentially followed by treatment of a concomitant HSL. In our practice, for subcritical bone loss (<20%), we use the Pittsburgh Instability Tool score to determine whether to perform anterior Bankart repair with or without remplissage or bone reconstruction. For glenoid bone loss of 20% to 30%, we typically offer an open Latarjet procedure and consider remplissage for off-track or near-track HSLs. For glenoid bone loss of more than 30%, we use the Latarjet procedure if the glenoid native anatomy can be restored. Otherwise, we typically recommend a distal tibial allograft with screw fixation and potentially a remplissage based on the track status of the HSL.
复发性前路不稳伴肩关节骨丢失是几种手术选择的难题。Latarjet技术仍然是肩关节骨重建的金标准,在严重肩关节骨丢失的情况下具有良好的长期疗效。然而,这种技术有众所周知的缺点,包括并发症的高发生率。自由骨块已经变得流行,以克服这些限制,更灵活地恢复解剖结构。髂骨自体移植物(ICBA)是一种在世界范围内使用的可靠的移植物,特别是在同种异体移植物成本过高的国家,并且具有良好的临床效果和与Latarjet相似的不稳定复发率。然而,ICBA也与供体部位的高发病率有关。由于报道螺钉固定的风险,如内扣和胶带环扎术等替代固定方法越来越受欢迎,包括硬件突出和骨溶解,与螺钉相比,文献中结果不一。在许多情况下,我认为螺钉的问题是由于过大的移植物最终重塑为正常的盂骨形状,导致螺钉“突出”。尽管如此,螺钉固定仍然是固定的金标准。随着人们对肱骨和盂骨丢失之间复杂的相互作用的了解越来越多,简单地重建盂骨可能不足以解决希尔-萨克斯综合征,特别是如果盂骨的重塑随着时间的推移而发生。无论采用何种技术,肩关节骨重建的大小应与原肩关节相匹配,然后潜在地处理伴随的Hill Sachs病变(HSL)。在我们的实践中,对于亚临界骨丢失(30%),如果能够恢复关节盂的固有解剖结构,我们使用Latarjet。否则,我们通常推荐胫骨远端同种异体移植物螺钉固定,并可能根据Hill-Sachs病变的轨迹状态进行复发。
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopic Free Bone Blocks With Alternative Fixation Are Likely the Wave of the Future but Further Research Is Necessary Before Widespread Adoption","authors":"Albert Lin M.D. (Editorial Board),&nbsp;Ryan Gilbert B.A.,&nbsp;Luilly Vargas M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone loss is a difficult problem with several surgical options. The Latarjet technique remains the gold standard for glenoid bone reconstruction in the setting of critical glenoid bone loss, with excellent long-term outcomes. However, this technique has well-known downsides including high rates of complications. Free bone blocks have become popular to overcome these limitations and are more flexible for restoring anatomy. Iliac crest bone autograft is a tried-and-true graft used worldwide, particularly in countries where allograft is cost prohibitive, and has shown great clinical results and instability recurrence rates similar to the Latarjet procedure. However, iliac crest bone autograft has also been associated with high rates of donor site morbidity. Alternative methods of fixation such as cortical buttons and tape cerclage are gaining popularity owing to reported risks of screw fixation, including hardware prominence and osteolysis, with mixed results in the literature compared with screws. In many cases, we believe the issues with screws develop as a result of oversized grafts that eventually remodel to the normal shape of the glenoid, leading to screw “prominence.” Nonetheless, screw fixation remains the gold standard for fixation. As more is learned of the complex interplay between humeral and glenoid bone loss, simply reconstructing the glenoid may not be enough to address the Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL), particularly if remodeling of the glenoid occurs over time. Regardless of technique, glenoid bone reconstruction should be sized to match the native glenoid, potentially followed by treatment of a concomitant HSL. In our practice, for subcritical bone loss (&lt;20%), we use the Pittsburgh Instability Tool score to determine whether to perform anterior Bankart repair with or without remplissage or bone reconstruction. For glenoid bone loss of 20% to 30%, we typically offer an open Latarjet procedure and consider remplissage for off-track or near-track HSLs. For glenoid bone loss of more than 30%, we use the Latarjet procedure if the glenoid native anatomy can be restored. Otherwise, we typically recommend a distal tibial allograft with screw fixation and potentially a remplissage based on the track status of the HSL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 4991-4994"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145006974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recovery Stages After Multiligament Knee Reconstruction 膝关节多韧带重建后的恢复阶段
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.09.001
Warren W. Nielsen M.D. , Jill K. Monson P.T., O.C.S , Robert F. LaPrade M.D., Ph.D. , Andrew G. Geeslin M.D.
Multiligament knee injuries are severe limb-threatening injuries involving a tear of two or more of the major knee ligaments including the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, and fibular (lateral) collateral ligament/posterolateral corner. Anatomic reconstructions can help restore joint stability, which is complemented by a postoperative rehabilitation program to maximize knee function. The postoperative recovery will likely be extended compared with single-ligament procedures and usually involves robust precautions. However, it can be started the day after the reconstruction procedure to include initiation of knee motion. The goals are similar to those of single-ligament procedures including gradual recovery of motion, strength, and load capacity; as well as symptom control, restoration of cardiovascular fitness, and long-term joint protection. These are achieved through a protocolized rehabilitation program that involves four phases: recovery phase, transition phase, rebuild phase, and restore phase. Their goals and milestones are incremental to achieve optimal patient outcomes. With a team-based approach to protocolized recovery between the patient, surgeon, and rehabilitation team, patient function and return to activities can be maximized.
膝关节多韧带损伤是严重的四肢威胁损伤,涉及两个或多个膝关节主要韧带撕裂,包括前交叉韧带、后交叉韧带、内侧副韧带和腓骨(外侧)副韧带/后外侧角。解剖重建可以帮助恢复关节稳定性,这是术后康复计划的补充,以最大限度地发挥膝关节功能。与单韧带手术相比,术后恢复可能会延长,并且通常需要采取强有力的预防措施。然而,它可以在重建手术后的第二天开始,包括膝关节运动的开始。目标与单韧带手术相似,包括逐渐恢复运动、力量和负荷能力;控制症状,恢复心血管健康,长期保护关节。这些都是通过协议化的康复计划实现的,该计划包括四个阶段:恢复阶段、转换阶段、重建阶段和恢复阶段。他们的目标和里程碑是渐进式的,以达到最佳的患者结果。在患者、外科医生和康复团队之间采用基于团队的康复协议方法,可以最大限度地提高患者的功能和恢复活动。
{"title":"Recovery Stages After Multiligament Knee Reconstruction","authors":"Warren W. Nielsen M.D. ,&nbsp;Jill K. Monson P.T., O.C.S ,&nbsp;Robert F. LaPrade M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Andrew G. Geeslin M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiligament knee injuries are severe limb-threatening injuries involving a tear of two or more of the major knee ligaments including the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, and fibular (lateral) collateral ligament/posterolateral corner. Anatomic reconstructions can help restore joint stability, which is complemented by a postoperative rehabilitation program to maximize knee function. The postoperative recovery will likely be extended compared with single-ligament procedures and usually involves robust precautions. However, it can be started the day after the reconstruction procedure to include initiation of knee motion. The goals are similar to those of single-ligament procedures including gradual recovery of motion, strength, and load capacity; as well as symptom control, restoration of cardiovascular fitness, and long-term joint protection. These are achieved through a protocolized rehabilitation program that involves four phases: recovery phase, transition phase, rebuild phase, and restore phase. Their goals and milestones are incremental to achieve optimal patient outcomes. With a team-based approach to protocolized recovery between the patient, surgeon, and rehabilitation team, patient function and return to activities can be maximized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 4965-4967"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145718902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1