首页 > 最新文献

Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Computer Navigation-Assisted Osteochondroplasty May Improve Accuracy of Resection Planning With Limited Outcome Differences Compared With Freehand Hip Arthroscopic Technique in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome 与徒手髋关节镜技术相比,计算机导航辅助骨软骨成形术可提高股骨髋臼撞击综合征患者切除计划的准确性,但结果差异有限。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.048
Masayoshi Saito M.D., Ph.D. , Shota Higashihira M.D., Ph.D. , Yohei Yukizawa M.D., Ph.D. , Hyonmin Choe M.D., Ph.D. , Hiroyuki Ike M.D., Ph.D. , Ken Kumagai M.D., Ph.D. , Yutaka Inaba M.D., Ph.D. , Naomi Kobayashi

Purpose

To evaluate the achievement of the preoperative plan and clinical outcomes in patients with cam- or combined-type femoroacetabular impingement syndrome undergoing computer navigation-assisted arthroscopic osteochondroplasty compared with freehand techniques.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients treated between 2020 and 2024 who met the following criteria: (1) primary hip arthroscopic surgery for cam- or combined-type femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, (2) availability of pre- and postoperative computed tomography imaging, and (3) minimum 12-month follow-up. Patients were divided into a navigation-assisted group and a freehand group. In the navigation group, a computed tomography−based system was used, enabling real-time tracking of the abrader burr during resection. Achievement of the preoperative plan was assessed by comparing postoperative 3-dimensional range of motion simulations to preoperative targets at 90°, 70°, and 45° of hip flexion. Clinical outcomes included the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS).

Results

Fifty-five hips were included (25 in the navigation-assisted group and 30 in the freehand group). Mean follow-up was 14.7 ± 4.4 months (range, 12-25 months) in the navigation group and 31.3 ± 11.2 months (range, 12-58 months) in the freehand group. The navigation group had greater achievement rates of the preoperative range of motion plan at 90° (92.0% vs 46.7%, P < .001) and 70° (80.0% vs 50.0%, P = .027). At 1 year, NAHS was greater in the navigation group (88.6 ± 9.2 vs 79.8 ± 18.9, P = .037), with more patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (76.0% vs 46.7%, P = .032). There were no significant differences in mHHS, revision arthroscopy, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

Conclusions

Computer navigation-assisted osteochondroplasty may improve the accuracy of cam resection and contribute to better short-term outcomes such as the NAHS at 1 year. However, clinical benefits over freehand technique were limited in other measures such as mHHS, revision, or conversion rates.

Level of Evidence

Level Ⅲ, retrospective comparative study.
目的:评价计算机导航辅助关节镜下单股或混合型股髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)患者行计算机导航辅助关节镜下骨软骨成形术与徒手成形术的术前计划和临床结果。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2020年至2024年期间接受治疗的患者,符合以下标准:(1)髋关节镜手术治疗凸轮或联合型FAIS,(2)术前和术后CT成像的可用性,(3)至少12个月的随访。患者分为导航辅助组和徒手组。导航组使用基于ct的系统,可以在切除过程中实时跟踪磨刀毛刺。通过比较术后3D ROM模拟与术前髋关节屈曲90°、70°和45°的目标来评估术前计划的实现情况。临床结果包括改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)和非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)。结果:共纳入55个髋部(导航辅助组25个,徒手组30个)。导航组平均随访14.7±4.4个月(范围:12-25个月),徒手组平均随访31.3±11.2个月(范围:12-58个月)。导航组术前ROM计划在90°(92.0% vs 47.0%, P < 0.001)和70°(80.0% vs 50.0%, P = 0.027)的成活率较高。1年时,导航组NAHS较高(88.6±9.2 vs 79.8±18.9,P = 0.037),达到MCID的患者较多(76.0% vs 46.7%, P = 0.032)。在mHHS、关节镜翻修或全髋关节置换术方面没有显著差异。结论:计算机导航辅助的骨软骨成形术可以提高凸轮切除术的准确性,并有助于改善短期预后,如1年的NAHS。然而,与徒手技术相比,临床益处在其他指标(如mHHS、修正或转换率)上受到限制。证据水平:Ⅲ,回顾性比较研究。
{"title":"Computer Navigation-Assisted Osteochondroplasty May Improve Accuracy of Resection Planning With Limited Outcome Differences Compared With Freehand Hip Arthroscopic Technique in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome","authors":"Masayoshi Saito M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Shota Higashihira M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Yohei Yukizawa M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Hyonmin Choe M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Ike M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Ken Kumagai M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Yutaka Inaba M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Naomi Kobayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.048","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.048","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the achievement of the preoperative plan and clinical outcomes in patients with cam- or combined-type femoroacetabular impingement syndrome undergoing computer navigation-assisted arthroscopic osteochondroplasty compared with freehand techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients treated between 2020 and 2024 who met the following criteria: (1) primary hip arthroscopic surgery for cam- or combined-type femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, (2) availability of pre- and postoperative computed tomography imaging, and (3) minimum 12-month follow-up. Patients were divided into a navigation-assisted group and a freehand group. In the navigation group, a computed tomography−based system was used, enabling real-time tracking of the abrader burr during resection. Achievement of the preoperative plan was assessed by comparing postoperative 3-dimensional range of motion simulations to preoperative targets at 90°, 70°, and 45° of hip flexion. Clinical outcomes included the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-five hips were included (25 in the navigation-assisted group and 30 in the freehand group). Mean follow-up was 14.7 ± 4.4 months (range, 12-25 months) in the navigation group and 31.3 ± 11.2 months (range, 12-58 months) in the freehand group. The navigation group had greater achievement rates of the preoperative range of motion plan at 90° (92.0% vs 46.7%, P &lt; .001) and 70° (80.0% vs 50.0%, <em>P</em> = .027). At 1 year, NAHS was greater in the navigation group (88.6 ± 9.2 vs 79.8 ± 18.9, <em>P</em> = .037), with more patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (76.0% vs 46.7%, <em>P</em> = .032). There were no significant differences in mHHS, revision arthroscopy, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Computer navigation-assisted osteochondroplasty may improve the accuracy of cam resection and contribute to better short-term outcomes such as the NAHS at 1 year. However, clinical benefits over freehand technique were limited in other measures such as mHHS, revision, or conversion rates.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level Ⅲ, retrospective comparative study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5151-5163.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145093045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cover Image & Video Link 封面图片和视频链接
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0749-8063(25)00672-3
{"title":"Cover Image & Video Link","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0749-8063(25)00672-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0749-8063(25)00672-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Page A18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145718865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Platelet-Rich Plasma and Its Analogs Do Not Clinically Improve Functional Outcomes 1 Year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 富血小板血浆及其类似物不能改善ACL重建一年后的临床功能结局:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.031
Paulo Vitor Pereira Pinho M.D. , Maria L.R. Defante , Gustavo Miranda Oliveira , Joaquim Fernandes Fagundes Júnior M.D.

Purpose

To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with a minimum 12-month follow-up to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) improves postoperative functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were evaluated for studies involving the use of PRP or its analogs in ACLR. Only randomized controlled trials with a follow-up period of 12 months or more that presented only PRP as an intervention were selected. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1), and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

Results

We included 502 patients who underwent ACLR from 9 studies; 251 of these patients were treated with PRP. The mean age ranged from 27.7 to 34.5 years, and the studies reported the participation of 109 female patients. The use of PRP in ACLR resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score after 12 months (mean difference, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-3.85; P = .03; I2 = 27%). However, there was no statistical significance based on the minimal clinically important difference. No statistically significant differences were found for the Tegner and Lysholm scores at 12 months.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of PRP and its analogs in ACLR. Functional outcomes were compared after 12 months in both the PRP-enhanced group and the inactive control group. Although the IKDC score showed a statistically significant improvement (P < .05), the Lysholm and Tegner scores did not show significant differences. The statistical difference in the IKDC score, however, did not translate into a clinically significant difference based on the minimal clinically important difference. These findings suggest that although some functional benefits may be observed within the first year after surgery, overall recovery remains variable.

Level of Evidence

Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.
目的:通过一项为期至少12个月的随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,评估目前富血小板血浆(PRP)是否能改善前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后功能结局的争议。方法:对MEDLINE、EMBASE和COCHRANE数据库中涉及PRP或其类似物在ACLR中使用的研究进行评估。仅选择随访12个月或更长时间且仅将PRP作为干预措施的rct。采用R软件(Version 4.4.1)进行统计分析,采用I2评估异质性。结果:我们纳入了来自ACLR的9项研究的502例患者,其中251例接受了PRP治疗。平均年龄从27.7岁到34.5岁不等,研究报告了109名女性的参与。使用PRP进行ACL重建导致12个月后国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分有统计学意义的改善(MD = 2.05;95% ci = 0.25 - 3.85;P = 0.03;I2 = 27%)。然而,基于最小临床重要差异(MCID),无统计学意义。12个月时Tegner和Lysholm评分无统计学差异。结论:本荟萃分析评估了PRP及其类似物在ACLR中的作用。12个月后,PRP增强组和无活性对照组的功能结果进行比较。IKDC评分有统计学意义的改善(p < 0.05), Lysholm和Tegner评分无显著差异。然而,统计差异并没有转化为基于MCID的临床显著差异。这些发现表明,尽管在手术后的第一年可能会观察到一些功能上的益处,但总体恢复仍然是可变的。
{"title":"Platelet-Rich Plasma and Its Analogs Do Not Clinically Improve Functional Outcomes 1 Year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Paulo Vitor Pereira Pinho M.D. ,&nbsp;Maria L.R. Defante ,&nbsp;Gustavo Miranda Oliveira ,&nbsp;Joaquim Fernandes Fagundes Júnior M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.031","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with a minimum 12-month follow-up to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) improves postoperative functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were evaluated for studies involving the use of PRP or its analogs in ACLR. Only randomized controlled trials with a follow-up period of 12 months or more that presented only PRP as an intervention were selected. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1), and heterogeneity was assessed using the <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 502 patients who underwent ACLR from 9 studies; 251 of these patients were treated with PRP. The mean age ranged from 27.7 to 34.5 years, and the studies reported the participation of 109 female patients. The use of PRP in ACLR resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score after 12 months (mean difference, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-3.85; <em>P</em> = .03; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 27%). However, there was no statistical significance based on the minimal clinically important difference. No statistically significant differences were found for the Tegner and Lysholm scores at 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of PRP and its analogs in ACLR. Functional outcomes were compared after 12 months in both the PRP-enhanced group and the inactive control group. Although the IKDC score showed a statistically significant improvement (<em>P</em> &lt; .05), the Lysholm and Tegner scores did not show significant differences. The statistical difference in the IKDC score, however, did not translate into a clinically significant difference based on the minimal clinically important difference. These findings suggest that although some functional benefits may be observed within the first year after surgery, overall recovery remains variable.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5292-5300.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144568149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remnant Preservation Improves 10-Year Graft Survival and Rotational Stability in Anatomic Single-Bundle Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 残肢保存提高解剖单束腘绳肌腱ACL重建10年移植物存活和旋转稳定性。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.031
Kyoung Ho Yoon M.D., Ph.D. , Bo Seung Bae M.D. , Seung Jae Lee M.D. , Dae Keun Suh M.D., Ph.D.

Purpose

To compare clinical outcomes and survival rates of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with versus without remnant preservation using hamstring autografts at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed unilateral isolated ACLRs with hamstring autografts performed between 2005 and 2012. Inclusion criteria were primary anterior cruciate ligament rupture, single-bundle 4-strand hamstring autograft, and a minimum 10-year follow-up. Cases of multiligament injury, allograft use, or revision surgery were excluded. At arthroscopy, knees were assigned to remnant-preserved ACLR (RP-ACLR) when a continuous stump thicker than 50% of the native bundle was retained; otherwise, they were assigned to non-remnant ACLR (NR-ACLR). The Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lachman and pivot-shift tests, coronal alignment, and graft failures were evaluated. The minimal clinically important difference defined responder status. Kaplan-Meier and standard parametric or nonparametric tests were performed to compare groups, with P < .05 defined as statistically significant.

Results

This study enrolled 91 patients (51 RP-ACLR and 40 NR-ACLR) with a mean follow-up period of 164.1 ± 38.4 months (157.2 ± 30.4 months vs 172.9 ± 45.5 months, P = .126). Baseline age, sex, and body mass index were comparable. The 10-year survival rate was higher in the RP-ACLR group (92.5% vs 83.0%, P = .040). Failures occurred in 5 of 51 RP-ACLR patients (9.8%) and 11 of 40 NR-ACLR patients (27.5%, P = .050). Grade 3 pivot shift was observed in 3 RP-ACLR and 8 NR-ACLR patients (P = .009), and overall pivot shift grades favored RP-ACLR patients (P = .040). The Tegner score (P = .794), Lysholm score (P = .551), IKDC score (P = .136), Lachman test (P = .695), weight-bearing line ratio (P = .407), and mechanical axis (P = .202) showed no differences. The minimal clinically important difference responder rates were comparable for the IKDC score (100% in each group), Lysholm score (100% in each group), and Tegner score (7.8% in the RP-ACLR group vs 7.5% in the NR-ACLR group).

Conclusions

Remnant preservation in isolated primary anatomic ACLR using hamstring autografts provides higher 10-year graft survival and superior rotational stability compared with non-remnant ACLR, with no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes, knee stability tests, coronal alignment, osteoarthritis progression, or the proportion of patients achieving clinically important improvement.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative case series.
目的:比较分离前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)与不保留残体的10年预后和生存率。方法:回顾性分析2005年至2012年间进行的单侧孤立ACLRs自体腿筋移植手术。纳入标准为原发性前交叉韧带破裂、单束四股腘绳肌腱自体移植物和至少10年随访。排除了多韧带损伤、同种异体移植或翻修手术。在关节镜检查中,当残端厚度为50%时,将膝关节分配到残端保留ACLR (RP-ACLR),否则分配到非残端ACLR (NR-ACLR)。Tegner, Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分,Lachman和枢轴移位试验,冠状排列和移植物失败进行评估。最小临床重要差异(MCID)定义应答者状态。Kaplan-Meier和标准参数或非参数检验比较各组结果:91例患者(51例RP-ACLR, 40例NR-ACLR),平均随访时间为164.1±38.4个月(157.2±30.4和172.9±45.5,P= 0.126)。基线年龄、性别和体重指数具有可比性。RP-ACLR组10年生存率较高(92.5% vs 83.0%, P= 0.040)。5/51例RP-ACLRs(9.8%)和11/40例NR-ACLRs (27.5%, P= 0.050)出现失败。3级枢轴移位出现在3个RP-ACLR和8个NR-ACLR中(P= 0.009),总体枢轴移位等级倾向于RP-ACLR (P= 0.040)。Tegner (P=.794)、Lysholm (P=.551)、IKDC (P=.136)、Lachman (P=.695)、负重线比(P=.407)、机械轴(P=.202)差异无统计学意义。IKDC(100%)、Lysholm(100%)和Tegner (RP-ACLR 7.8% vs NR-ACLR 7.5%)的MCID应答率相当。结论:与非残体ACLR相比,残体保存在分离的原发解剖ACLR中使用腘绳肌腱自体移植物提供了更高的10年移植物存活率和更好的旋转稳定性,并且在患者报告的结果、膝关节稳定性测试、冠状排列、骨关节炎进展或获得临床重要改善的患者比例方面没有显著差异。证据水平iii:回顾性比较病例系列。
{"title":"Remnant Preservation Improves 10-Year Graft Survival and Rotational Stability in Anatomic Single-Bundle Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction","authors":"Kyoung Ho Yoon M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Bo Seung Bae M.D. ,&nbsp;Seung Jae Lee M.D. ,&nbsp;Dae Keun Suh M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.031","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare clinical outcomes and survival rates of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with versus without remnant preservation using hamstring autografts at a minimum 10-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed unilateral isolated ACLRs with hamstring autografts performed between 2005 and 2012. Inclusion criteria were primary anterior cruciate ligament rupture, single-bundle 4-strand hamstring autograft, and a minimum 10-year follow-up. Cases of multiligament injury, allograft use, or revision surgery were excluded. At arthroscopy, knees were assigned to remnant-preserved ACLR (RP-ACLR) when a continuous stump thicker than 50% of the native bundle was retained; otherwise, they were assigned to non-remnant ACLR (NR-ACLR). The Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lachman and pivot-shift tests, coronal alignment, and graft failures were evaluated. The minimal clinically important difference defined responder status. Kaplan-Meier and standard parametric or nonparametric tests were performed to compare groups, with <em>P</em> &lt; .05 defined as statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This study enrolled 91 patients (51 RP-ACLR and 40 NR-ACLR) with a mean follow-up period of 164.1 ± 38.4 months (157.2 ± 30.4 months vs 172.9 ± 45.5 months, <em>P</em> = .126). Baseline age, sex, and body mass index were comparable. The 10-year survival rate was higher in the RP-ACLR group (92.5% vs 83.0%, <em>P</em> = .040). Failures occurred in 5 of 51 RP-ACLR patients (9.8%) and 11 of 40 NR-ACLR patients (27.5%, <em>P</em> = .050). Grade 3 pivot shift was observed in 3 RP-ACLR and 8 NR-ACLR patients (<em>P</em> = .009), and overall pivot shift grades favored RP-ACLR patients (<em>P</em> = .040). The Tegner score (<em>P</em> = .794), Lysholm score (<em>P</em> = .551), IKDC score (<em>P</em> = .136), Lachman test (<em>P</em> = .695), weight-bearing line ratio (<em>P</em> = .407), and mechanical axis (<em>P</em> = .202) showed no differences. The minimal clinically important difference responder rates were comparable for the IKDC score (100% in each group), Lysholm score (100% in each group), and Tegner score (7.8% in the RP-ACLR group vs 7.5% in the NR-ACLR group).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Remnant preservation in isolated primary anatomic ACLR using hamstring autografts provides higher 10-year graft survival and superior rotational stability compared with non-remnant ACLR, with no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes, knee stability tests, coronal alignment, osteoarthritis progression, or the proportion of patients achieving clinically important improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, retrospective comparative case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5278-5287"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144765827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishing the Minimum Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction 建立孤立髌股内侧韧带重建后的最小临床重要差异、患者可接受的症状状态和实质性临床获益。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.029
Tristan J. Elias M.D. , Erik Haneberg B.S. , Daniel J. Kaplan M.D. , Andrew Phillips M.D. , Divesh Sachdev M.H.A., B.S. , Nikhil Verma M.D. , Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D. , Brian Forsythe M.D. , Brian J. Cole M.D., M.B.A. , Adam B. Yanke M.D., Ph.D.

Purpose

To establish the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the Kujala score in patients who underwent isolated Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) for patellar instability with a minimum 23 month follow-up.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing primary MPFLR between April 2016 and June 2021. Patients with concomitant procedures, such as osteotomy, trochleoplasty, meniscus repair, other ligamentous reconstruction, and cartilage transplantation, were excluded. Kujala scores were recorded at baseline and minimum of 23 months postoperatively. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to calculate the MCID, SCB, and PASS.

Results

A total of 107 patients (109 knees; 21.5 ± 9.1 years old, 26.0 ± 6.7, 68.2% female, 61.5% left side) with a minimum of 23 months follow-up patient-reported outcome measures were included in the final analysis. The Kujala score threshold for achieving the MCID was defined as an increase of 10.0 on the basis of the distribution-method calculations and 12.0 using anchor-based analysis. The SCB was defined as an increase of 25.5. The PASS was defined as achieving a minimum of 23 month Kujala score of 78.5. These results are comparable with scores seen at 6 months and 1 year. The MCID was calculated to be 86% sensitive and 64% specific; SCB was found to be 67% sensitive and 100% specific; and PASS was found to be 85% sensitive and 80% specific. The rates of achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS at a minimum of 23 months were 89% (distribution)/84% (anchor), 58%, and 78%, respectively.

Conclusions

This study established thresholds for the MCID, SCB, and PASS at a minimum of 23 months after isolated MPFLR. The distribution-based MCID corresponded with an improvement in Kujala score or 10.0 as compared with the anchor-based method of 12.0. The value for achieving a SCB was 25.5. An absolute Kujala score of 78.5 was determined to be the threshold for patient satisfaction 23 months postoperatively.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective case series.
目的:通过至少23个月的随访,确定因髌骨不稳定而接受孤立性MPFLR的患者的Kujala评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)和实际临床获益(SCB)。方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了2016年4月至2021年6月期间接受原发性MPFLR的患者的前瞻性数据库。同时行截骨、滑车成形术、半月板修复、其他韧带重建和软骨移植等手术的患者被排除在外。在基线和术后至少23个月记录Kujala评分。采用基于锚定和基于分布的方法计算MCID、SCB和PASS。结果:共107例患者(109膝;年龄21.5±9.1岁,26.0±6.7 kg/m2, 68.2%女性,61.5%左侧),随访至少23个月的患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)被纳入最终分析。实现MCID的Kujala评分阈值定义为基于分布法计算的10.0和基于锚点分析的12.0。SCB的定义是增加25.5。通过的定义是达到最低23个月的库加拉分数78.5。这些结果与6个月和1年的评分相当。计算出MCID的敏感性为86%,特异性为64%;SCB的敏感性为67%,特异性为100%;而PASS的敏感性为85%,特异性为80%。在至少23个月内达到MCID、SCB和PASS的比率分别为89%(分布)/84%(锚定)、58%和78%。结论:本研究在孤立性MPFLR后至少23个月建立了MCID、SCB和PASS的阈值。与基于锚点的方法的12.0相比,基于分布的MCID方法的Kujala评分提高了10.0。达到SCB的值为25.5。术后23个月的绝对Kujala评分为78.5分,为患者满意度的阈值。证据等级:四级;回顾性病例系列。
{"title":"Establishing the Minimum Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction","authors":"Tristan J. Elias M.D. ,&nbsp;Erik Haneberg B.S. ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Kaplan M.D. ,&nbsp;Andrew Phillips M.D. ,&nbsp;Divesh Sachdev M.H.A., B.S. ,&nbsp;Nikhil Verma M.D. ,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Brian Forsythe M.D. ,&nbsp;Brian J. Cole M.D., M.B.A. ,&nbsp;Adam B. Yanke M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.029","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.029","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To establish the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the Kujala score in patients who underwent isolated Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) for patellar instability with a minimum 23 month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study used a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing primary MPFLR between April 2016 and June 2021. Patients with concomitant procedures, such as osteotomy, trochleoplasty, meniscus repair, other ligamentous reconstruction, and cartilage transplantation, were excluded. Kujala scores were recorded at baseline and minimum of 23 months postoperatively. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to calculate the MCID, SCB, and PASS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 107 patients (109 knees; 21.5 ± 9.1 years old, 26.0 ± 6.7, 68.2% female, 61.5% left side) with a minimum of 23 months follow-up patient-reported outcome measures were included in the final analysis. The Kujala score threshold for achieving the MCID was defined as an increase of 10.0 on the basis of the distribution-method calculations and 12.0 using anchor-based analysis. The SCB was defined as an increase of 25.5. The PASS was defined as achieving a minimum of 23 month Kujala score of 78.5. These results are comparable with scores seen at 6 months and 1 year. The MCID was calculated to be 86% sensitive and 64% specific; SCB was found to be 67% sensitive and 100% specific; and PASS was found to be 85% sensitive and 80% specific. The rates of achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS at a minimum of 23 months were 89% (distribution)/84% (anchor), 58%, and 78%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study established thresholds for the MCID, SCB, and PASS at a minimum of 23 months after isolated MPFLR. The distribution-based MCID corresponded with an improvement in Kujala score or 10.0 as compared with the anchor-based method of 12.0. The value for achieving a SCB was 25.5. An absolute Kujala score of 78.5 was determined to be the threshold for patient satisfaction 23 months postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5268-5275"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144765824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revision Hip Arthroscopy Yields Inferior Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State Along with Higher Total Hip Arthroplasty Conversion Compared to the Primary Setting at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up 在至少2年的随访中,翻修髋关节镜产生了较差的患者报告的结果测量和患者可接受的症状状态,同时与初始设置相比,全髋关节置换术转换率更高。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.014
Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinosa M.D. , Fernando Gómez-Verdejo M.D. , Michael J. Murray B.S. , Kyleen Jan M.D. , Amelia Hummel M.D. , Melissa Carpenter B.S. , Udit Dave B.S. , Cameron Gerhold B.S. , Felipe Casanova M.D. , Kristen I. Barton M.D., Ph.D. , Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D.

Purpose

To compare functional and patient-reported outcomes between primary and revision hip arthroscopy.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) from inception to October 2024, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Only comparative clinical studies evaluating primary versus revision hip arthroscopy with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Evaluated outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures, reoperation/total hip arthroplasty conversion rates, and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS)/minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates.

Results

Nine studies were retrieved for analysis. In total, 2,128 and 723 patients (2,230 and 737 hips) were included in the primary and revision setting, respectively. Femoroacetabular impingement and labral-related procedures were reported in all patients. At a minimum 2-year follow-up, Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Sports Subsection scores ranged from 77 to 87.4 and 57 to 91.7 in the primary and from 77.6 to 80.4 and 54.4 to 65.3 in the revision groups, respectively. Moreover, modified Hip Harris Score and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 scores presented lower ranges in the revision setting, upon comparison with the primary cohort (72.2-81 vs 80-96 and 59.4-63.7 vs 71.9-91.5, respectively). Furthermore, revision/repeat revision ranged from 0-12.5% in the primary and 0-14.2% in the revision cohort. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty varied from 0 to 12.6% in the primary and from 0 to 27.5% in the revision arm. PASS threshold achievement rates were higher in the primary hip arthroscopy group in 3 of the 4 studies that reported them (55.8-71.1% vs 29.4-80.6%).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy achieve inferior functional outcomes, reflected in patient reported outcome measures and PASS achievement rates, compared to the primary setting. No apparent revision or repeat revision arthroscopy differences were observed; however, the revision cohort trended toward higher total hip arthroplasty conversions. These results support our hypothesis regarding inferior outcomes and higher conversion rates in revision cases.

Level of Evidence

III, systematic review of Level II-III studies
目的:比较初次和翻修髋关节镜的功能和患者报告的结果。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,从成立到2024年10月,使用3个数据库(PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL)进行系统检索。仅纳入了评估初次与翻修髋关节镜的比较临床研究,随访时间至少为2年。评估结果包括患者报告的结果测量、再手术/全髋关节置换术转换率、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)/最小临床重要差异(MCID)完成率。结果:9项研究被检索用于分析。总共有2128和723例患者(2230和737髋)分别被纳入初级和翻修设置。所有患者均报道了股骨髋臼撞击和与外唇相关的手术。在至少2年的随访中,髋关节结局评分日常生活活动和运动分段评分在初级组分别为77-87.4和57-91.7,在修订组分别为77.6-80.4和54.4-65.3。此外,与主要队列相比,修订后的髋关节Harris评分和国际髋关节结局工具12评分在修订设置中呈现较低的范围(分别为72.2-81对80-96和59.4-63.7对71.9-91.5)。此外,修订/重复修订在初级队列中为0-12.5%,在修订队列中为0-14.2%。全髋关节置换术的转换率在原始组为0-12.6%,在翻修组为0-27.5%。四项研究中有三项报告了原发性髋关节镜组的PASS阈值完成率更高(55.8-71.1%对29.4-80.6%)。结论:与初始设置相比,接受翻修髋关节镜检查的患者获得了较差的功能结果,反映在患者报告的结果测量和PASS成功率上。没有观察到明显的翻修或重复翻修关节镜差异,然而,翻修队列倾向于更高的全髋关节置换术转换率。这些结果支持了我们关于翻修病例的较差结果和较高转换率的假设。证据等级:III, II-III级研究的系统评价。
{"title":"Revision Hip Arthroscopy Yields Inferior Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State Along with Higher Total Hip Arthroplasty Conversion Compared to the Primary Setting at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up","authors":"Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinosa M.D. ,&nbsp;Fernando Gómez-Verdejo M.D. ,&nbsp;Michael J. Murray B.S. ,&nbsp;Kyleen Jan M.D. ,&nbsp;Amelia Hummel M.D. ,&nbsp;Melissa Carpenter B.S. ,&nbsp;Udit Dave B.S. ,&nbsp;Cameron Gerhold B.S. ,&nbsp;Felipe Casanova M.D. ,&nbsp;Kristen I. Barton M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare functional and patient-reported outcomes between primary and revision hip arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted using 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) from inception to October 2024, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Only comparative clinical studies evaluating primary versus revision hip arthroscopy with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Evaluated outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures, reoperation/total hip arthroplasty conversion rates, and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS)/minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine studies were retrieved for analysis. In total, 2,128 and 723 patients (2,230 and 737 hips) were included in the primary and revision setting, respectively. Femoroacetabular impingement and labral-related procedures were reported in all patients. At a minimum 2-year follow-up, Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Sports Subsection scores ranged from 77 to 87.4 and 57 to 91.7 in the primary and from 77.6 to 80.4 and 54.4 to 65.3 in the revision groups, respectively. Moreover, modified Hip Harris Score and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 scores presented lower ranges in the revision setting, upon comparison with the primary cohort (72.2-81 vs 80-96 and 59.4-63.7 vs 71.9-91.5, respectively). Furthermore, revision/repeat revision ranged from 0-12.5% in the primary and 0-14.2% in the revision cohort. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty varied from 0 to 12.6% in the primary and from 0 to 27.5% in the revision arm. PASS threshold achievement rates were higher in the primary hip arthroscopy group in 3 of the 4 studies that reported them (55.8-71.1% vs 29.4-80.6%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy achieve inferior functional outcomes, reflected in patient reported outcome measures and PASS achievement rates, compared to the primary setting. No apparent revision or repeat revision arthroscopy differences were observed; however, the revision cohort trended toward higher total hip arthroplasty conversions. These results support our hypothesis regarding inferior outcomes and higher conversion rates in revision cases.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>III, systematic review of Level II-III studies</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5378-5390"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144719214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Platelet-Rich Plasma Is More Effective Than Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trials 富血小板血浆比注射透明质酸治疗膝关节骨关节炎更有效:一项基于随机、双盲、对照临床试验的荟萃分析
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.033
Yun-feng Li , Huan-huan Xing B.A. , Chuan-kun Wei , Yu-tian Chen , Ya-qi Sun , Fu-lin Liu , Yu-han Wu , Wei Yang Ph.D.

Purpose

To evaluate the difference in clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

This study conducted a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases. Eligible studies underwent rigorous quality assessment using the Cochrane Handbook 8.2 Risk of Bias 2 criteria. A meta-analysis of efficacy-related indicators was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

Fifteen double-blind randomized controlled trials comprising 1,632 patients with KOA ranging from I to III on the Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the PRP group exhibited significantly lower Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scores and total scores from baseline compared to the HA group at 12 months (MD = –1.14; 95% CI, –2.09 to –0.20; P = .02; MD = –7.33; 95% CI, –12.81 to –1.85; P = .009, respectively), both of which reached the minimal clinically important difference. Visual analog scale scores were also significantly reduced in the PRP group at 12 months (mean difference [MD] = –0.35; 95% CI, –0.59 to –0.10; P = .005, respectively). Improved International Knee Documentation Committee scores were observed in the PRP group at 1 month (MD = 3.13; 95% CI, 1.34-4.93; P = .0006, respectively).

Conclusions

After 12 months, there were statistically significant differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and total scores, as well as minimal clinically important differences, with PRP being superior to HA in the treatment of KOA.

Level of Evidence

Level Ⅱ, meta-analysis of Level Ⅰ and Ⅱ studies.
目的:评价富血小板血浆(PRP)与透明质酸(HA)治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的临床疗效差异。方法:全面检索Cochrane Library、Web of Science、PubMed、CNKI、万方数据、VIP数据库。符合条件的研究采用Cochrane手册8.2偏倚风险2 (RoB 2)标准进行严格的质量评估。采用RevMan 5.4软件对疗效相关指标进行meta分析。结果:纳入15项双盲随机对照试验,包括1632例KOA患者,Kellgren-Lawrence分级量表分为I至III级。meta分析显示,与HA组相比,PRP组在12个月时表现出显著低于Western Ontario和McMaster university Osteoarthritis Index疼痛评分和基线总分[MD = -1.14, 95% CI (-2.09, -0.20), P = 0.02;MD = -7.33, 95% CI (-12.81, -1.85), P = 0.009],均达到最小临床差异。PRP组的视觉模拟量表评分在12个月时也显著降低[MD = -0.35, 95% CI (-0.59, -0.10), P = 0.005]。PRP组1个月时国际膝关节文献委员会评分提高[MD = 3.13, 95% CI (1.34, 4.93), P = 0.0006]。结论:12个月时,两组在WOMAC疼痛、总疼痛和最小临床重要差异上有统计学意义,PRP治疗KOA优于HA。证据水平:Ⅱ水平,Ⅰ和Ⅱ水平研究的荟萃分析。
{"title":"Platelet-Rich Plasma Is More Effective Than Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trials","authors":"Yun-feng Li ,&nbsp;Huan-huan Xing B.A. ,&nbsp;Chuan-kun Wei ,&nbsp;Yu-tian Chen ,&nbsp;Ya-qi Sun ,&nbsp;Fu-lin Liu ,&nbsp;Yu-han Wu ,&nbsp;Wei Yang Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.033","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.033","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the difference in clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study conducted a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases. Eligible studies underwent rigorous quality assessment using the Cochrane Handbook 8.2 Risk of Bias 2 criteria. A meta-analysis of efficacy-related indicators was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen double-blind randomized controlled trials comprising 1,632 patients with KOA ranging from I to III on the Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the PRP group exhibited significantly lower Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scores and total scores from baseline compared to the HA group at 12 months (MD = –1.14; 95% CI, –2.09 to –0.20; <em>P</em> = .02; MD = –7.33; 95% CI, –12.81 to –1.85; <em>P</em> = .009, respectively), both of which reached the minimal clinically important difference. Visual analog scale scores were also significantly reduced in the PRP group at 12 months (mean difference [MD] = –0.35; 95% CI, –0.59 to –0.10; <em>P</em> = .005, respectively). Improved International Knee Documentation Committee scores were observed in the PRP group at 1 month (MD = 3.13; 95% CI, 1.34-4.93; <em>P</em> = .0006, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>After 12 months, there were statistically significant differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and total scores, as well as minimal clinically important differences, with PRP being superior to HA in the treatment of KOA.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level Ⅱ, meta-analysis of Level Ⅰ and Ⅱ studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5304-5318"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144669048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Commentary: Remnant-Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Shows Long-Term Advantages, but Patient Selection, Characterization of Remnant Tissue, and Efficacy in Patients at Risk of Postoperative Knee Instability Are Areas for Future Investigation 编辑评论:保留残肢前交叉韧带重建具有长期优势,但患者选择、残肢组织特征和术后膝关节不稳定风险患者的疗效是未来研究的领域。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.014
Jay Moran M.D., Etienne Cavaignac M.D., Ph.D., Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D.
Remnant preservation is one specific anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique that has been explored to improve outcomes and involves retaining, as opposed to debriding, the “remnant” or native ACL tibial stump at the time of reconstruction. The ACL remnant tissue contains important mechanoreceptors and nerve endings, and preservation of this tissue is thought to enhance biological healing within the bone tunnels, graft ligamentization, maturation, synovialization, and proprioception, as well as reduce the risk of tunnel enlargement. Remnant preservation may also offer several technical advantages such as creation of a biological sleeve for the graft and improved anatomic graft placement. The indications for remnant preservation remain unclear, but greater than 50% thickness of remaining remnant tissue is our recommended threshold for preservation. Although long-term clinical studies are currently lacking, multiple short- and mid-term follow-up studies have suggested that remnant-preserving techniques can offer significantly superior pivot-shift outcomes and anterior knee stability, in addition to lower graft rerupture rates. Ultimately, remnant-preserving ACL reconstructions are exciting techniques that appear to offer a variety of benefits, but patient selection and indications, standardized characterization of the remnant tissue, and assessment of the long-term efficacy in patients at risk of residual postoperative rotational knee instability are still areas for future investigation.
残肢保存是一种特殊的前交叉韧带(ACL)重建技术,已被探索以改善结果,包括在重建时保留“残肢”或原生ACL胫骨残端,而不是清除。前交叉韧带残余组织含有重要的机械感受器和神经末梢,保存这些组织被认为可以促进骨隧道内的生物愈合、移植物韧带化、成熟、滑膜化、本体感觉,并降低隧道扩大的风险。残体保存也可以提供一些技术优势,例如为移植物创建生物套筒和改进的解剖移植物放置。残体保存的适应症尚不清楚,但大于50%的残余组织厚度是我们推荐的保存阈值。虽然目前缺乏长期临床研究,但多项短期和中期随访研究表明,残体保留技术可以提供明显更好的枢轴移位结果、膝关节前稳定性和更低的移植物再破裂率。最终,保留残余的前交叉韧带重建是令人兴奋的技术,似乎提供了各种各样的好处,但患者的选择和适应症,残余组织的标准化特征,以及评估其对术后残余旋转膝不稳定患者的长期疗效仍是未来研究的领域。
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Remnant-Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Shows Long-Term Advantages, but Patient Selection, Characterization of Remnant Tissue, and Efficacy in Patients at Risk of Postoperative Knee Instability Are Areas for Future Investigation","authors":"Jay Moran M.D.,&nbsp;Etienne Cavaignac M.D., Ph.D.,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Remnant preservation is one specific anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique that has been explored to improve outcomes and involves retaining, as opposed to debriding, the “remnant” or native ACL tibial stump at the time of reconstruction. The ACL remnant tissue contains important mechanoreceptors and nerve endings, and preservation of this tissue is thought to enhance biological healing within the bone tunnels, graft ligamentization, maturation, synovialization, and proprioception, as well as reduce the risk of tunnel enlargement. Remnant preservation may also offer several technical advantages such as creation of a biological sleeve for the graft and improved anatomic graft placement. The indications for remnant preservation remain unclear, but greater than 50% thickness of remaining remnant tissue is our recommended threshold for preservation. Although long-term clinical studies are currently lacking, multiple short- and mid-term follow-up studies have suggested that remnant-preserving techniques can offer significantly superior pivot-shift outcomes and anterior knee stability, in addition to lower graft rerupture rates. Ultimately, remnant-preserving ACL reconstructions are exciting techniques that appear to offer a variety of benefits, but patient selection and indications, standardized characterization of the remnant tissue, and assessment of the long-term efficacy in patients at risk of residual postoperative rotational knee instability are still areas for future investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5288-5291"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144979681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimal Hip Flexion Increase During Gait After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Pre- and Postoperative 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis 股骨髋臼撞击手术后步态中髋屈曲增加最小:对术前和术后3D运动分析的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.015
Talissa O. Generoso M.D. , Felipe F. Gonzalez M.D., M.Sc. , Alexandre R.M. Pelegrinelli P.T., Ph.D. , Lucas V. Pallone M.D. , Renato Locks M.D. , Eliane C. Guadagnin Ph.D. , Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D. , Jonathan A. Gustafson Ph.D. , Leonardo Metsavaht M.D., Ph.D. , Gustavo Leporace P.T., Ph.D.

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of surgical treatment on gait biomechanics in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).

Methods

A comprehensive search of 6 databases (from inception to 2024) was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (CRD4202347397). Studies using 3-dimensional motion analysis to examine gait kinematics and/or kinetics in patients with FAIS before and after hip surgery were included. Studies analyzing data from patients with FAIS who had undergone surgery but lacked baseline presurgical data from the same patients or compared patients to controls without evaluating both pre- and postsurgical biomechanics were excluded. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed.

Results

Thirteen studies were reviewed qualitatively, and 12 were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 279 presurgical and 268 postsurgical patients. Motion analysis was conducted 6 to 24.2 months postoperatively. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.3° in peak hip flexion angle during the gait cycle, although this may have limited clinical relevance. Other kinematic and kinetic parameters did not show significant differences. The quality of the studies was moderate or high.

Conclusions

This study showed a statistically significant increase in peak hip flexion and abduction angle throughout the gait cycle after surgery, although these changes were clinically negligible. The lack of significant changes in other kinematic and kinetic parameters indicates that factors beyond bone deformities may influence outcomes. These findings highlight the multifactorial nature of FAIS and suggest gait analysis alone may not fully capture postoperative biomechanical adaptations.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估手术治疗对股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)患者步态生物力学的影响。方法:按照PRISMA指南(CRD4202347397)对6个数据库(从成立到2024年)进行全面检索。使用三维(3D)运动分析来检查髋关节手术前后FAIS患者的步态运动学和/或动力学的研究包括在内。排除了对FAIS患者数据进行分析的研究,这些患者接受了手术,但缺乏同一患者的基线术前数据,或将患者与对照组进行比较,但未评估术前和术后生物力学。进行了定性和定量分析。结果:13项研究被定性回顾,12项被纳入meta分析,包括279名术前和268名术后患者。术后6 ~ 24.2个月进行运动分析。荟萃分析显示,在步态周期中,髋峰值屈曲角度1.3°有统计学意义的改善,尽管这可能具有有限的临床相关性。其他运动学和动力学参数无显著差异。研究质量为中等或高。结论:本研究显示,手术后整个步态周期中髋屈曲峰值和外展角有统计学意义的增加,尽管这些变化在临床上可以忽略不计。其他运动学和动力学参数缺乏显著变化表明骨畸形以外的因素可能影响预后。这些发现强调了FAIS的多因素性质,并表明单靠步态分析可能无法完全捕获术后生物力学适应。证据等级:IV (I-IV级研究的系统评价)。
{"title":"Minimal Hip Flexion Increase During Gait After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Pre- and Postoperative 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis","authors":"Talissa O. Generoso M.D. ,&nbsp;Felipe F. Gonzalez M.D., M.Sc. ,&nbsp;Alexandre R.M. Pelegrinelli P.T., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Lucas V. Pallone M.D. ,&nbsp;Renato Locks M.D. ,&nbsp;Eliane C. Guadagnin Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Gustafson Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Leonardo Metsavaht M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Gustavo Leporace P.T., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of surgical treatment on gait biomechanics in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search of 6 databases (from inception to 2024) was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (CRD4202347397). Studies using 3-dimensional motion analysis to examine gait kinematics and/or kinetics in patients with FAIS before and after hip surgery were included. Studies analyzing data from patients with FAIS who had undergone surgery but lacked baseline presurgical data from the same patients or compared patients to controls without evaluating both pre- and postsurgical biomechanics were excluded. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen studies were reviewed qualitatively, and 12 were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 279 presurgical and 268 postsurgical patients. Motion analysis was conducted 6 to 24.2 months postoperatively. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.3° in peak hip flexion angle during the gait cycle, although this may have limited clinical relevance. Other kinematic and kinetic parameters did not show significant differences. The quality of the studies was moderate or high.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study showed a statistically significant increase in peak hip flexion and abduction angle throughout the gait cycle after surgery, although these changes were clinically negligible. The lack of significant changes in other kinematic and kinetic parameters indicates that factors beyond bone deformities may influence outcomes. These findings highlight the multifactorial nature of FAIS and suggest gait analysis alone may not fully capture postoperative biomechanical adaptations.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5391-5409.e30"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Commentary: Concomitant Osteotomy and Meniscus Centralization Should Be Considered in Selected Patients Undergoing Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair 在选择接受内侧半月板后根修复的患者时应考虑同时截骨和半月板集中。
IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.022
Adnan Saithna M.D., F.A.A.N.A. (Associate Editor)
Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) are associated with severe biomechanical consequences (loss of hoop force transmission) that are broadly equivalent to a total meniscectomy. The resultant increase in contact pressures predisposes to high rates of advanced medial compartment arthritis at long-term follow-up. Repair of MMPRTs is associated with significantly better outcomes than partial meniscectomy or nonoperative treatment (including improved patient-reported outcome measures and delay or even avoidance of arthroplasty). However, some patients may benefit from the addition of concomitant procedures (including osteotomy and meniscus centralization) to improve clinical outcomes and mitigate modifiable risk factors for failure of MMPRT repair. Although high-quality comparative studies are lacking, this strategy is supported by biomechanical data, clinical studies (including second-look arthroscopy data), and international consensus group statements.
内侧半月板后根撕裂(MMPRTs)与严重的生物力学后果(失去环力传递)相关,大致相当于全半月板切除术。在长期随访中,接触压力的增加导致晚期内侧隔室关节炎的高发率。与半月板部分切除术或非手术治疗相比,MMPRTs修复的结果明显更好(包括改善患者报告的结果测量和延迟甚至避免关节置换术)。然而,一些患者可能受益于增加的伴随手术(包括截骨和半月板集中),以改善临床结果并减轻MMPRT修复失败的可改变危险因素。虽然缺乏高质量的比较研究,但这一策略得到了生物力学数据、临床研究(包括二次关节镜数据)和国际共识小组声明的支持。
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Concomitant Osteotomy and Meniscus Centralization Should Be Considered in Selected Patients Undergoing Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair","authors":"Adnan Saithna M.D., F.A.A.N.A. (Associate Editor)","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.022","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) are associated with severe biomechanical consequences (loss of hoop force transmission) that are broadly equivalent to a total meniscectomy. The resultant increase in contact pressures predisposes to high rates of advanced medial compartment arthritis at long-term follow-up. Repair of MMPRTs is associated with significantly better outcomes than partial meniscectomy or nonoperative treatment (including improved patient-reported outcome measures and delay or even avoidance of arthroplasty). However, some patients may benefit from the addition of concomitant procedures (including osteotomy and meniscus centralization) to improve clinical outcomes and mitigate modifiable risk factors for failure of MMPRT repair. Although high-quality comparative studies are lacking, this strategy is supported by biomechanical data, clinical studies (including second-look arthroscopy data), and international consensus group statements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 12","pages":"Pages 5227-5229"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145014436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1