In this research paper by Chew et al.,1 on page 590, the funding information in the Acknowledgement is incorrect.
The correct funding information should be:
This work is funded by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [Grant Number: FRGS/1/2019/STG06/USM/02/5], for the project entitled “New Robust Adaptive Model for Coefficient of Variation in Infinite and Finite Horizon Processes.”
{"title":"Erratum to “An improved Hotelling's T2 chart for monitoring a finite horizon process based on run rules schemes: A Markov-chain approach”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/asmb.2833","DOIUrl":"10.1002/asmb.2833","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article corrects the following:</p><p>In this research paper by Chew et al.,<span><sup>1</sup></span> on page 590, the funding information in the Acknowledgement is incorrect.</p><p>The correct funding information should be:</p><p>This work is funded by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [Grant Number: FRGS/1/2019/STG06/USM/02/5], for the project entitled “New Robust Adaptive Model for Coefficient of Variation in Infinite and Finite Horizon Processes.”</p><p>We apologise for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":55495,"journal":{"name":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","volume":"40 1","pages":"216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asmb.2833","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138692524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Qinglong Tian, Colin Lewis-Beck, Jarad B. Niemi, William Q. Meeker
We response to comments on our paper “Specifying Prior Distributions in Reliability Applications” in this rejoinder.
我们在本复函中回应了对我们的论文 "在可靠性应用中指定先验分布 "的评论。
{"title":"Rejoinder to “Specifying Prior Distribution in Reliability Applications”","authors":"Qinglong Tian, Colin Lewis-Beck, Jarad B. Niemi, William Q. Meeker","doi":"10.1002/asmb.2832","DOIUrl":"10.1002/asmb.2832","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We response to comments on our paper “Specifying Prior Distributions in Reliability Applications” in this rejoinder.</p>","PeriodicalId":55495,"journal":{"name":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","volume":"40 1","pages":"130-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asmb.2832","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138561594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jordan L. Oakley, Matthew Forshaw, Pete Philipson, Kevin J. Wilson
The ability to predict failures in hard disk drives (HDDs) is a major objective of HDD manufacturers since avoiding unexpected failures may prevent data loss, improve service reliability, and reduce data center downtime. Most HDDs are equipped with a threshold-based monitoring system named self-monitoring, analysis and reporting technology (SMART). The system collects several performance metrics, called SMART attributes, and detects anomalies that may indicate incipient failures. SMART works as a nascent failure detection method and does not estimate the HDDs' remaining useful life. We define critical attributes and critical states for hard drives using SMART attributes and fit multi-state models to the resulting semi-competing risks data. The multi-state models provide a coherent and novel way to model the failure time of a hard drive and allow us to examine the impact of critical attributes on the failure time of a hard drive. We derive dynamic predictions of conditional survival probabilities, which are adaptive to the state of the drive. Using a dataset of HDDs equipped with SMART, we find that drives are more likely to fail after entering critical states. We evaluate the predictive accuracy of the proposed models with a case study of HDDs equipped with SMART, using the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the expected prediction error (PE). The results suggest that accounting for changes in the critical attributes improves the accuracy of dynamic predictions.
{"title":"Examining the impact of critical attributes on hard drive failure times: Multi-state models for left-truncated and right-censored semi-competing risks data","authors":"Jordan L. Oakley, Matthew Forshaw, Pete Philipson, Kevin J. Wilson","doi":"10.1002/asmb.2829","DOIUrl":"10.1002/asmb.2829","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ability to predict failures in hard disk drives (HDDs) is a major objective of HDD manufacturers since avoiding unexpected failures may prevent data loss, improve service reliability, and reduce data center downtime. Most HDDs are equipped with a threshold-based monitoring system named self-monitoring, analysis and reporting technology (SMART). The system collects several performance metrics, called SMART attributes, and detects anomalies that may indicate incipient failures. SMART works as a nascent failure detection method and does not estimate the HDDs' remaining useful life. We define critical attributes and critical states for hard drives using SMART attributes and fit multi-state models to the resulting semi-competing risks data. The multi-state models provide a coherent and novel way to model the failure time of a hard drive and allow us to examine the impact of critical attributes on the failure time of a hard drive. We derive dynamic predictions of conditional survival probabilities, which are adaptive to the state of the drive. Using a dataset of HDDs equipped with SMART, we find that drives are more likely to fail after entering critical states. We evaluate the predictive accuracy of the proposed models with a case study of HDDs equipped with SMART, using the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the expected prediction error (PE). The results suggest that accounting for changes in the critical attributes improves the accuracy of dynamic predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55495,"journal":{"name":"Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry","volume":"40 3","pages":"684-709"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asmb.2829","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138492889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}