Pub Date : 2022-10-31DOI: 10.1177/00211400221129404b
Liam M. Tracey
{"title":"Book Review: Christian Solar Symbolism and Jesus the Sun of Justice","authors":"Liam M. Tracey","doi":"10.1177/00211400221129404b","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221129404b","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"364 - 366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47594597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-31DOI: 10.1177/00211400221129404e
P. Rosemann
divestment, admissions, and curriculum are analyzed. In this context, the book clearly demonstrates that the only ‘control’ that the Catholic Church actually possesses and exercises relates to ownership of property and the characteristic spirit of their schools. This is a necessary and welcome contribution when, as suggested in this book, a potential citizens assembly on the role and place of religion (particularly the Catholic Church) in education and health care looks imminent. Overall, McGraw and Tiernan make a welcome contribution to contemporary discourse in primary education. The book provides a balanced and informed understanding of the politics of primary education and all stakeholders in education will garner much in terms of contemplating what educational reform in primary education might look like into the future. It is a timely contribution when the prospect of a citizen’s assembly seems likely, where the following questions may be asked: What, if any, benefit is there for Irish society in continuing to maintain a plurality of patrons and educational visions in Irish education? Or would it be better to eradicate such plurality of patrons and educational visions, and in their place, provide a singular hegemonic state patronage model where a singular non-denominational educational vision is espoused?
{"title":"Book Review: Tradition and Apocalypse: An Essay on the Future of Christian Belief","authors":"P. Rosemann","doi":"10.1177/00211400221129404e","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221129404e","url":null,"abstract":"divestment, admissions, and curriculum are analyzed. In this context, the book clearly demonstrates that the only ‘control’ that the Catholic Church actually possesses and exercises relates to ownership of property and the characteristic spirit of their schools. This is a necessary and welcome contribution when, as suggested in this book, a potential citizens assembly on the role and place of religion (particularly the Catholic Church) in education and health care looks imminent. Overall, McGraw and Tiernan make a welcome contribution to contemporary discourse in primary education. The book provides a balanced and informed understanding of the politics of primary education and all stakeholders in education will garner much in terms of contemplating what educational reform in primary education might look like into the future. It is a timely contribution when the prospect of a citizen’s assembly seems likely, where the following questions may be asked: What, if any, benefit is there for Irish society in continuing to maintain a plurality of patrons and educational visions in Irish education? Or would it be better to eradicate such plurality of patrons and educational visions, and in their place, provide a singular hegemonic state patronage model where a singular non-denominational educational vision is espoused?","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"370 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48690043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-31DOI: 10.1177/00211400221129404g
J. Sullivan
Second, throughout the book MacDougall emphasizes the non-confessional nature of Anglican theology. Anglicans, lacking an authoritative confession, set the boundary markers as wide as possible ‘while retaining fidelity to its sources and tradition’ (p. 17). Yet many Anglicans affiliated with the Anglican Church in North America and many global Anglican bodies would disagree and point to the 39 Articles as an authoritative confession expressing the fundamental principles of Anglican belief. MacDougall does present his case and certainly is speaking from a popular, if not the majority, opinion in the Anglican communion. However he does not present an argument that would cause someone who views the 39 Articles confessionally to reconsider. MacDougall builds his characterization of Anglicanism from the position of non-confessionalism. With a large portion of Anglican pastors and academics operating from the confessional position, it seems that MacDougall only presents a shape of Anglican theology rather than the shape of Anglican theology. That being said, it seems that both the confessional and non-confessional positions still maintain the same virtues that MacDougall sees as strengths of the Anglican tradition. Though the 39 Articles set the boundary markers tighter than the Chicago–Lambeth Quadrilateral, they are not nearly as expansive as something like the Augsburg Confession. The Articles can be affirmed by Calvinists, Arminians, evangelicals, AngloCatholics, infallibilists, inerrantists, and a host of other theological camps. Whether one opts for the confessional status of the 39 Articles or the non-confessional stance that prioritizes the Chicago–Lambeth Quadrilateral, it is apparent that Anglican theology is generally aimed at requiring minimal doctrinal requirements and accommodating a broad range of diversity within its ecclesial unity. Overall, this is an excellent contribution to the field of Anglican studies. Whereas histories and biographies of Anglicanism and its major figures abound, few have attempted to capture the spirit and shape of Anglican theology in a way that is both faithful to Anglican history and broad enough to encompass Anglican diversity. MacDougall’s work would be appropriate for university students engaged in the study of Anglican and/ or reformation theology and lay-people who simply wish to understand their own tradition in more detail. It would also be worthwhile reading for established Anglican theologians, who may be surprised to find how the shape of their own theology is deeply indebted to the Anglican tradition they inhabit.
{"title":"Book Review: Education in Late Antiquity","authors":"J. Sullivan","doi":"10.1177/00211400221129404g","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221129404g","url":null,"abstract":"Second, throughout the book MacDougall emphasizes the non-confessional nature of Anglican theology. Anglicans, lacking an authoritative confession, set the boundary markers as wide as possible ‘while retaining fidelity to its sources and tradition’ (p. 17). Yet many Anglicans affiliated with the Anglican Church in North America and many global Anglican bodies would disagree and point to the 39 Articles as an authoritative confession expressing the fundamental principles of Anglican belief. MacDougall does present his case and certainly is speaking from a popular, if not the majority, opinion in the Anglican communion. However he does not present an argument that would cause someone who views the 39 Articles confessionally to reconsider. MacDougall builds his characterization of Anglicanism from the position of non-confessionalism. With a large portion of Anglican pastors and academics operating from the confessional position, it seems that MacDougall only presents a shape of Anglican theology rather than the shape of Anglican theology. That being said, it seems that both the confessional and non-confessional positions still maintain the same virtues that MacDougall sees as strengths of the Anglican tradition. Though the 39 Articles set the boundary markers tighter than the Chicago–Lambeth Quadrilateral, they are not nearly as expansive as something like the Augsburg Confession. The Articles can be affirmed by Calvinists, Arminians, evangelicals, AngloCatholics, infallibilists, inerrantists, and a host of other theological camps. Whether one opts for the confessional status of the 39 Articles or the non-confessional stance that prioritizes the Chicago–Lambeth Quadrilateral, it is apparent that Anglican theology is generally aimed at requiring minimal doctrinal requirements and accommodating a broad range of diversity within its ecclesial unity. Overall, this is an excellent contribution to the field of Anglican studies. Whereas histories and biographies of Anglicanism and its major figures abound, few have attempted to capture the spirit and shape of Anglican theology in a way that is both faithful to Anglican history and broad enough to encompass Anglican diversity. MacDougall’s work would be appropriate for university students engaged in the study of Anglican and/ or reformation theology and lay-people who simply wish to understand their own tradition in more detail. It would also be worthwhile reading for established Anglican theologians, who may be surprised to find how the shape of their own theology is deeply indebted to the Anglican tradition they inhabit.","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"375 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42212936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-15DOI: 10.1177/00211400221127113
Kevin Clarke
Does Paul of Tarsus have a Mariology? Patristic exegetes and the liturgical tradition have latched onto his one obvious implication of Mary’s place in the Christian mystery, that is, ‘born from a woman’ in Galatians. While this essay explores the case against a Mariological reading of Gal 4:4, it ultimately shows through plausible philological evidence that Paul intentionally refers to none other than Mary in 4:4. Sonship and motherhood are also taken up and further developed in his famous allegory equating the ‘two women’ of the Abrahamic narrative to ‘two covenants.’ But how many women are there in Galatians 4? The only ones named are Hagar and ‘the Jerusalem above,’ while Sarah and Mary fade unmentioned into the silence of Pauline mystery. This essay unveils some further potential Mariological connections to be found in these women, focusing especially on the development of ‘law,’ ‘slave,’ ‘woman,’ ‘son,’ ‘promise,’ and ‘heir.’
{"title":"‘Born from a Woman’: Unveiling the Marian Mystery beneath Paul’s Allegory in Galatians 4","authors":"Kevin Clarke","doi":"10.1177/00211400221127113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221127113","url":null,"abstract":"Does Paul of Tarsus have a Mariology? Patristic exegetes and the liturgical tradition have latched onto his one obvious implication of Mary’s place in the Christian mystery, that is, ‘born from a woman’ in Galatians. While this essay explores the case against a Mariological reading of Gal 4:4, it ultimately shows through plausible philological evidence that Paul intentionally refers to none other than Mary in 4:4. Sonship and motherhood are also taken up and further developed in his famous allegory equating the ‘two women’ of the Abrahamic narrative to ‘two covenants.’ But how many women are there in Galatians 4? The only ones named are Hagar and ‘the Jerusalem above,’ while Sarah and Mary fade unmentioned into the silence of Pauline mystery. This essay unveils some further potential Mariological connections to be found in these women, focusing especially on the development of ‘law,’ ‘slave,’ ‘woman,’ ‘son,’ ‘promise,’ and ‘heir.’","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"315 - 333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49286938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-11DOI: 10.1177/00211400221129404
A. Graffy
As one who avidly studied the first edition in the 1970s, and introduced my students to the second edition in the 1990s, I was delighted to learn about the third edition of the Jerome Biblical Commentary. Pope Francis writes in the Foreword: ‘The relationship between the Risen Lord, the community of believers, and sacred Scripture is essential to our identity as Christians.’ The Lord ‘never tires of speaking’ his living word, and by hearing it ‘we are also encouraged to strengthen our bonds with the Jewish people and to pray for Christian unity.’ Biblical scholarship is a service of love for the community of faith. ‘The ministry of opening the word of God to God’s people is a sacred trust that demands serious study, deep love, and openness to the beauty and power of the Scriptures.’ These words in the Foreword remind us that the scholarly endeavours of so many are inspired by hearts that are open to hearing and understanding the Word. The Introduction to JBC21 is written by the four editors, John J. Collins, Gina HensPiazza, Barbara E. Reid OP, and Donald Senior CP. The involvement of women and men as members of the editorial team shows how Catholic biblical scholarship has embraced the talents of women. This is clear throughout the volume. In their introduction the editors point out that this is the third generation of The Jerome Biblical Commentary. The first edition appeared in 1968, shortly after the Second Vatican Council and inspired by it, and the second edition in 1990 as The New Jerome Biblical Commentary. From the start, the Commentary intended to present the Scriptures ‘from a Roman Catholic point of view.’ This may seem rather restrictive now. Would the contributors not rather consider that they are using the best methods of contemporary biblical scholarship in a Roman Catholic context? The Introduction heralds Divino Afflante Spiritu (1943) as the ‘Magna Charta,’ as often happens, but without acknowledging Providentissimus Deus of Leo XIII, the 50 years of which Pope Pius XII is commemorating. The early 20th century was indeed a time of suspicion in the Catholic Church, but it might have been far worse without Leo 1129404 ITQ0010.1177/00211400221129404Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-review2022
{"title":"Book Review: The Jerome Biblical Commentary for the Twenty-First Century","authors":"A. Graffy","doi":"10.1177/00211400221129404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221129404","url":null,"abstract":"As one who avidly studied the first edition in the 1970s, and introduced my students to the second edition in the 1990s, I was delighted to learn about the third edition of the Jerome Biblical Commentary. Pope Francis writes in the Foreword: ‘The relationship between the Risen Lord, the community of believers, and sacred Scripture is essential to our identity as Christians.’ The Lord ‘never tires of speaking’ his living word, and by hearing it ‘we are also encouraged to strengthen our bonds with the Jewish people and to pray for Christian unity.’ Biblical scholarship is a service of love for the community of faith. ‘The ministry of opening the word of God to God’s people is a sacred trust that demands serious study, deep love, and openness to the beauty and power of the Scriptures.’ These words in the Foreword remind us that the scholarly endeavours of so many are inspired by hearts that are open to hearing and understanding the Word. The Introduction to JBC21 is written by the four editors, John J. Collins, Gina HensPiazza, Barbara E. Reid OP, and Donald Senior CP. The involvement of women and men as members of the editorial team shows how Catholic biblical scholarship has embraced the talents of women. This is clear throughout the volume. In their introduction the editors point out that this is the third generation of The Jerome Biblical Commentary. The first edition appeared in 1968, shortly after the Second Vatican Council and inspired by it, and the second edition in 1990 as The New Jerome Biblical Commentary. From the start, the Commentary intended to present the Scriptures ‘from a Roman Catholic point of view.’ This may seem rather restrictive now. Would the contributors not rather consider that they are using the best methods of contemporary biblical scholarship in a Roman Catholic context? The Introduction heralds Divino Afflante Spiritu (1943) as the ‘Magna Charta,’ as often happens, but without acknowledging Providentissimus Deus of Leo XIII, the 50 years of which Pope Pius XII is commemorating. The early 20th century was indeed a time of suspicion in the Catholic Church, but it might have been far worse without Leo 1129404 ITQ0010.1177/00211400221129404Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-review2022","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"357 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48367733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-30DOI: 10.1177/00211400221127112
Lucas Briola
Engaging the writings of Bernard Lonergan, Charles Massy, and Pope Francis, this article offers a systematic exposition of the relationship between the Eucharist and regenerative agriculture. First, it surveys the overlapping cultural malaises identified by Massy, Francis, and Lonergan at the root of modern industrial agriculture. Second, in response to this form of decline, it shows how the regenerative agricultural practices called for by Massy instantiate the integral ecology called for by Pope Francis; at the same time, it substantiates Massy’s calls through the emergently probable worldview of Lonergan. Third, in a way that Massy does not show, such a worldview can elevate these agricultural concerns to a supernatural, redemptive plane. Not only does an emergently probable worldview show that right agricultural practices restore creation’s capacity to praise, so too does it show that Christian praise—as made especially apparent in the Eucharist—depends upon just agricultural practices.
这篇文章结合了Bernard Lonergan, Charles Massy和Pope Francis的著作，系统地阐述了圣餐和再生农业之间的关系。首先，它调查了梅西、弗朗西斯和洛尼根在现代工业化农业的根源上发现的重叠的文化弊病。其次，为了应对这种形式的衰退，它展示了梅西所呼吁的可再生农业实践如何体现了教皇弗朗西斯所呼吁的整体生态;与此同时，它通过洛尼根的紧急可能的世界观证实了梅西的呼吁。第三，以一种梅西没有表现出来的方式，这样的世界观可以把这些农业问题提升到一个超自然的、救赎的层面。一种紧急可能的世界观不仅表明正确的农业实践恢复了造物赞美的能力，而且还表明基督教的赞美——在圣餐中尤为明显——仅仅依赖于农业实践。
{"title":"Fruit of the Earth and Work of Human Hands: Connecting the Eucharist and Regenerative Agriculture","authors":"Lucas Briola","doi":"10.1177/00211400221127112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221127112","url":null,"abstract":"Engaging the writings of Bernard Lonergan, Charles Massy, and Pope Francis, this article offers a systematic exposition of the relationship between the Eucharist and regenerative agriculture. First, it surveys the overlapping cultural malaises identified by Massy, Francis, and Lonergan at the root of modern industrial agriculture. Second, in response to this form of decline, it shows how the regenerative agricultural practices called for by Massy instantiate the integral ecology called for by Pope Francis; at the same time, it substantiates Massy’s calls through the emergently probable worldview of Lonergan. Third, in a way that Massy does not show, such a worldview can elevate these agricultural concerns to a supernatural, redemptive plane. Not only does an emergently probable worldview show that right agricultural practices restore creation’s capacity to praise, so too does it show that Christian praise—as made especially apparent in the Eucharist—depends upon just agricultural practices.","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"297 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42747602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-30DOI: 10.1177/00211400221127120
James Gerard McEvoy
This article investigates the significance of cultural plurality for social and ecclesial life in a post-imperial age. It argues for a view of culture that recognizes and accommodates the diversity of each culture, conceives of culture in terms of social imaginaries and practices, and incorporates a nuanced view of intercultural dialogue. It begins with a précis of Stuart Hall’s account of culture, then examines at length the conceptions of culture in the works of James Tully and Charles Taylor, focusing on cultural diversity. In this context, the article contends that the ecclesial task of inculturation must be one of intercultural dialogue.
{"title":"Cultural Plurality and Inculturation: Foundations for Intercultural Dialogue","authors":"James Gerard McEvoy","doi":"10.1177/00211400221127120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221127120","url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the significance of cultural plurality for social and ecclesial life in a post-imperial age. It argues for a view of culture that recognizes and accommodates the diversity of each culture, conceives of culture in terms of social imaginaries and practices, and incorporates a nuanced view of intercultural dialogue. It begins with a précis of Stuart Hall’s account of culture, then examines at length the conceptions of culture in the works of James Tully and Charles Taylor, focusing on cultural diversity. In this context, the article contends that the ecclesial task of inculturation must be one of intercultural dialogue.","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"259 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41705656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-04DOI: 10.1177/00211400221107418e
Nathaniel Porter
wants to pull Protestant theology out of the abyss of excessive subjectivity, personal (often over-emotional) ‘spirituality,’ individualism, and self-obsession into which, according to him, Reformed spirituality and Pietism have led it. His book is very relevant. It is a much-needed tract aimed at an Evangelical tendency to forget the objectivity of the Gospel of grace (perfectly exemplified for him by Luther’s hyper-realistic Eucharistic theology and sacramental notion of the objectivity of Christ’s presence through the word proffered in preaching). It is not so different from Barth’s argument with Schleiermacher but is even more timely in a world increasingly dominated by tele-evangelists, mega-churches, privatized salvation, and self-obsessive spirituality. A massive dose of Luther-objectivity is more necessary than ever: but it seems unfortunate to me to do it by presenting a reductionist version of Augustine’s subtle, delicate, nuanced theology, in which the inner and outer, the social and individual, and the absolute enduring centrality of the incarnate Christ are always paramount. It is a splendid treatment of Luther, but its account of Augustine, fascinating as it is, must be read with some degree of caution.
{"title":"Book Review: Communicatio Idiomatum: Reformation Christological Debates","authors":"Nathaniel Porter","doi":"10.1177/00211400221107418e","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221107418e","url":null,"abstract":"wants to pull Protestant theology out of the abyss of excessive subjectivity, personal (often over-emotional) ‘spirituality,’ individualism, and self-obsession into which, according to him, Reformed spirituality and Pietism have led it. His book is very relevant. It is a much-needed tract aimed at an Evangelical tendency to forget the objectivity of the Gospel of grace (perfectly exemplified for him by Luther’s hyper-realistic Eucharistic theology and sacramental notion of the objectivity of Christ’s presence through the word proffered in preaching). It is not so different from Barth’s argument with Schleiermacher but is even more timely in a world increasingly dominated by tele-evangelists, mega-churches, privatized salvation, and self-obsessive spirituality. A massive dose of Luther-objectivity is more necessary than ever: but it seems unfortunate to me to do it by presenting a reductionist version of Augustine’s subtle, delicate, nuanced theology, in which the inner and outer, the social and individual, and the absolute enduring centrality of the incarnate Christ are always paramount. It is a splendid treatment of Luther, but its account of Augustine, fascinating as it is, must be read with some degree of caution.","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"250 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43312024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-04DOI: 10.1177/00211400221107418c
Barbara McCormack
{"title":"Book Review: No ordinary shepherds: Catholic chaplains to the British Forces in the Second World War","authors":"Barbara McCormack","doi":"10.1177/00211400221107418c","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221107418c","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"245 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45975762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-04DOI: 10.1177/00211400221107418d
E. Collins
{"title":"Book Review: The Meaning of Protestant Theology: Luther, Augustine and the Gospel that Gives Us Christ","authors":"E. Collins","doi":"10.1177/00211400221107418d","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221107418d","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"247 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48619941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：