Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE) has emerged as a tool in diagnosing and monitoring Crohn’s disease. Despite its importance, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis has focused on MRE’s impact in this field. This study addresses this gap by analyzing the 100 most-cited articles related to MRE in Crohn’s disease, revealing key trends and influential research in the field.
Methods
Two independent researchers utilized Scopus to identify relevant articles using predefined keywords. The articles were ranked by citation count, and detailed bibliographic data was collected. Advanced statistical analyses were conducted to identify research trends and evaluate article influence using citation metrics.
Results
Our study analyzed trends from 1990 to 2024, revealing a peak in research activity between 2008 and 2018, with the most articles (n = 52) published in 5 years from 2010 to 2014. Citation activity mirrored the trends with 100 most cited articles between 2008 and 2016, peaking in 2011 at nearly 7000 citations with a sharp decline after 2016. No significant correlation (p = 0.40) was identified between citation count and journal impact factor. Our study identified the shift in past research trends from fluoroscopy to MRE and the saturation in research on MRE in recent years.
Conclusion
Our study highlights a shift from fluoroscopy toward advanced MR techniques for managing Crohn’s disease.
Advances in knowledge
Our study highlights a shift from fluoroscopy to MRE research in recent years. However, the plateau in MRE research underscores the need for innovative investigative approaches and novel research directions.
{"title":"Trends and insights in the use of MR enterography for Crohn’s disease: a bibliometric analysis","authors":"Nayab Motasim, Muhammad Tayyab Ijaz, Haseeb Mukhtar, Iram Zaheer, Huzaifa Sabir Nawaz, Armeen Masood, Ambreen Zahoor, Muneeb Rasool, Namra Ijaz","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04972-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-04972-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE) has emerged as a tool in diagnosing and monitoring Crohn’s disease. Despite its importance, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis has focused on MRE’s impact in this field. This study addresses this gap by analyzing the 100 most-cited articles related to MRE in Crohn’s disease, revealing key trends and influential research in the field.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two independent researchers utilized Scopus to identify relevant articles using predefined keywords. The articles were ranked by citation count, and detailed bibliographic data was collected. Advanced statistical analyses were conducted to identify research trends and evaluate article influence using citation metrics.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Our study analyzed trends from 1990 to 2024, revealing a peak in research activity between 2008 and 2018, with the most articles (<i>n</i> = 52) published in 5 years from 2010 to 2014. Citation activity mirrored the trends with 100 most cited articles between 2008 and 2016, peaking in 2011 at nearly 7000 citations with a sharp decline after 2016. No significant correlation (<i>p</i> = 0.40) was identified between citation count and journal impact factor. Our study identified the shift in past research trends from fluoroscopy to MRE and the saturation in research on MRE in recent years.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study highlights a shift from fluoroscopy toward advanced MR techniques for managing Crohn’s disease.</p><h3>Advances in knowledge</h3><p>Our study highlights a shift from fluoroscopy to MRE research in recent years. However, the plateau in MRE research underscores the need for innovative investigative approaches and novel research directions.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5690 - 5707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144218518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-04DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05012-9
Mindy X. Wang, Molly L. Furrow, Mamie Gao, Ayesha Nasrullah, Mostafa A. Shehata, Akram M. Shaaban, Anuradha S. Shenoy-Bhangle, Margarita V. Revzin, Douglas S. Katz, Khaled M. Elsayes
The prevalence of cancer continues to increase both in the United States and worldwide. Oncologic emergencies are potentially life-threatening conditions in cancer patients, and these may be directly or indirectly related to the underlying malignancy. Radiologists must be well-versed not only in cancer staging, but also in potential cancer related complications and emergencies to guide prompt appropriate management. Oncologic emergencies may occur due to direct local effects by the tumor or metastasis, associated systemic manifestations, or due to treatment related effects. These emergencies may sometimes be the first presentation of the underlying malignancy. The various gastrointestinal oncologic emergencies include airway-esophageal fistula, intestinal obstruction, intestinal ischemia, intestinal perforation, intussusception, inflammatory/infectious bowel changes, torsion, and tumor-related gastrointestinal bleeding. This review article aims to highlight the clinical and key imaging manifestations of oncologic emergencies along with implications for management, with a particular focus on the gastrointestinal system.
{"title":"Gastrointestinal oncologic emergencies: a radiologists’ guide","authors":"Mindy X. Wang, Molly L. Furrow, Mamie Gao, Ayesha Nasrullah, Mostafa A. Shehata, Akram M. Shaaban, Anuradha S. Shenoy-Bhangle, Margarita V. Revzin, Douglas S. Katz, Khaled M. Elsayes","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05012-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05012-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prevalence of cancer continues to increase both in the United States and worldwide. Oncologic emergencies are potentially life-threatening conditions in cancer patients, and these may be directly or indirectly related to the underlying malignancy. Radiologists must be well-versed not only in cancer staging, but also in potential cancer related complications and emergencies to guide prompt appropriate management. Oncologic emergencies may occur due to direct local effects by the tumor or metastasis, associated systemic manifestations, or due to treatment related effects. These emergencies may sometimes be the first presentation of the underlying malignancy. The various gastrointestinal oncologic emergencies include airway-esophageal fistula, intestinal obstruction, intestinal ischemia, intestinal perforation, intussusception, inflammatory/infectious bowel changes, torsion, and tumor-related gastrointestinal bleeding. This review article aims to highlight the clinical and key imaging manifestations of oncologic emergencies along with implications for management, with a particular focus on the gastrointestinal system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5708 - 5718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144218410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In nodule-negative primary aldosteronism (PA), quantitative CT findings in unilateral PA differed from those in bilateral PA. We attempted to identify PA by quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced CT.
Methods
A retrospective search was performed for 81 patients with nodule-negative PA who underwent contrast-enhanced CT between January 2021 and November 2024 and adrenal vein sampling thereafter at XXXX. The test cohort and validation cohort were enrolled separately based on the PA type. The optimal cutoff value for identifying PA was analyzed and calculated in the test cohort, and its diagnostic performance was subsequently evaluated in the validation cohort.
Results
In the venous phase of the test cohort, the SD difference or ratio was significantly higher in unilateral-left PA than in bilateral PA [SD difference: 6.3 (4.4, 8.8) Hu vs. 2.5 (1.5, 4.4) Hu, P < 0.001; SD ratio: 1.2 (1.1, 1.3) vs. 1.1 (1.0, 1.1), P < 0.001]. At a cutoff value of 4.90 Hu, the sensitivity and specificity of the SD difference in predicting PA type were 0.733 and 0.957, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the SD ratio were 0.867 and 0.723 at a cutoff value of 1.130, respectively. In the validation cohort, the diagnostic performance of the SD difference in identifying PA type was similar to that of the SD ratio (0.801 vs. 0.917, P = 0.06).
Conclusion
Patients with nodule-negative PA can be further differentiated by bilateral adrenal heterogeneity on contrast-enhanced CT. The SD difference has similar predictive ability as the SD ratio.
目的:原发性结节阴性醛固酮增多症(PA)单侧与双侧的定量CT表现不同。我们试图通过对比增强CT的定量参数来识别PA。方法:回顾性分析81例结节阴性PA患者,于2021年1月至2024年11月期间接受了增强CT检查,并于XXXX年进行了肾上腺静脉采样。测试队列和验证队列根据PA类型分别入组。在测试队列中分析和计算识别PA的最佳临界值,并随后在验证队列中评估其诊断性能。结果:在测试队列的静脉期,单侧左侧PA的SD差值或比值明显高于双侧PA [SD差值:6.3 (4.4,8.8)Hu vs. 2.5 (1.5, 4.4) Hu, P]。结论:增强CT上通过双侧肾上腺异质性可进一步鉴别结节阴性PA患者。SD差与SD比具有相似的预测能力。
{"title":"Bilateral adrenal heterogeneity in contrast-enhanced CT for differentiating nodule-negative primary aldosteronism","authors":"Guo Li, Xin Qin, Qinlei Cai, Yuting Liao, Shishi Luo, Shanxi Guo, Feng Chen, Weiyuan Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05025-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05025-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In nodule-negative primary aldosteronism (PA), quantitative CT findings in unilateral PA differed from those in bilateral PA. We attempted to identify PA by quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced CT.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective search was performed for 81 patients with nodule-negative PA who underwent contrast-enhanced CT between January 2021 and November 2024 and adrenal vein sampling thereafter at XXXX. The test cohort and validation cohort were enrolled separately based on the PA type. The optimal cutoff value for identifying PA was analyzed and calculated in the test cohort, and its diagnostic performance was subsequently evaluated in the validation cohort.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the venous phase of the test cohort, the SD difference or ratio was significantly higher in unilateral-left PA than in bilateral PA [SD difference: 6.3 (4.4, 8.8) Hu vs. 2.5 (1.5, 4.4) Hu, <i>P</i> < 0.001; SD ratio: 1.2 (1.1, 1.3) vs. 1.1 (1.0, 1.1), <i>P</i> < 0.001]. At a cutoff value of 4.90 Hu, the sensitivity and specificity of the SD difference in predicting PA type were 0.733 and 0.957, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the SD ratio were 0.867 and 0.723 at a cutoff value of 1.130, respectively. In the validation cohort, the diagnostic performance of the SD difference in identifying PA type was similar to that of the SD ratio (0.801 vs. 0.917, <i>P</i> = 0.06).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with nodule-negative PA can be further differentiated by bilateral adrenal heterogeneity on contrast-enhanced CT. The SD difference has similar predictive ability as the SD ratio.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5998 - 6007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144218475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-04DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05046-z
Anna S. Samuel, Andee Qiao, Christina D. Merrill, Chad G. Ball, David Burrowes, Stephanie R. Wilson
Background and purpose
To appraise the inclusion of CEUS resection site evaluation in LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment (TRA) v2024, currently applied for ablative therapy. We highlight the specific benefits afforded by CEUS in this effort.
Methods
Retrospective chart review was performed for 102 patients following surgical resection of HCC and ICC with post-operative CEUS at our center. Demographic data, surgical history, CT/MR findings, and resection site appearances on greyscale and CEUS were documented. The resection site where the tumor was originally positioned was designated as the treatment site and the resection margin as the perilesional tissue to establish equal assessment to TRA for ablative therapy. The morphology of the resection site was assigned one of three appearances, using novel descriptors: EDGE, VOID, or SURFACE DIVOT. Resection sites were evaluated for benign appearances, post-surgical changes, and tumor recurrence, and then categorized with a CEUS LI-RADS TRA score.
Results
102 patients had 120 resection sites following 115 operations for 94 HCC and 8 ICC. On CEUS, 59 (49%) were characterized as EDGE, 46 (38%) as VOID, and 15 (13%) as SURFACE DIVOT, n = 120. 23 (19%) of resection sites were LR-TR VIABLE for recurrence, 91 (76%) LR-TR NONVIABLE, and 6 (5%) EQUIVOCAL, n = 120. Benign post-surgical changes developed in 23 (19%) resection sites, n = 120. 63/115 surgeries (55%) had post-operative recurrence, 40 De Novo, 17 Perilesional, and 6 Intralesional.
Conclusion
Our conclusions are in two categories: the first assessing the success of CEUS in the assessment of post-surgical treatment sites following liver resections. CEUS can successfully distinguish between unique post-operative appearances such as benign tissue migration, resection VOIDs resembling an intrinsic mass, and true recurrence. CEUS is thus strongly recommended for secondary surveillance following HCC and ICC resection. The second conclusion evaluates the inclusion of resection sites into the CEUS LI-RADS TRA algorithm for ablative therapies. In this regard, we believe that our study was highly successful, improving the perspective of all our staff as to what is important in the assessment of the post-surgical liver on CEUS and the method whereby this information is communicated to our referring clinicians.
{"title":"The post-surgical liver: is application of treatment response assessment within the CEUS LI-RADS framework possible?","authors":"Anna S. Samuel, Andee Qiao, Christina D. Merrill, Chad G. Ball, David Burrowes, Stephanie R. Wilson","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05046-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05046-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>To appraise the inclusion of CEUS resection site evaluation in LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment (TRA) v2024, currently applied for ablative therapy. We highlight the specific benefits afforded by CEUS in this effort.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective chart review was performed for 102 patients following surgical resection of HCC and ICC with post-operative CEUS at our center. Demographic data, surgical history, CT/MR findings, and resection site appearances on greyscale and CEUS were documented. The resection site where the tumor was originally positioned was designated as the treatment site and the resection margin as the perilesional tissue to establish equal assessment to TRA for ablative therapy. The morphology of the resection site was assigned one of three appearances, using novel descriptors: EDGE, VOID, or SURFACE DIVOT. Resection sites were evaluated for benign appearances, post-surgical changes, and tumor recurrence, and then categorized with a CEUS LI-RADS TRA score.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>102 patients had 120 resection sites following 115 operations for 94 HCC and 8 ICC. On CEUS, 59 (49%) were characterized as EDGE, 46 (38%) as VOID, and 15 (13%) as SURFACE DIVOT, <i>n</i> = 120. 23 (19%) of resection sites were LR-TR VIABLE for recurrence, 91 (76%) LR-TR NONVIABLE, and 6 (5%) EQUIVOCAL, <i>n</i> = 120. Benign post-surgical changes developed in 23 (19%) resection sites, <i>n</i> = 120. 63/115 surgeries (55%) had post-operative recurrence, 40 De Novo, 17 Perilesional, and 6 Intralesional.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our conclusions are in two categories: the first assessing the success of CEUS in the assessment of post-surgical treatment sites following liver resections. CEUS can successfully distinguish between unique post-operative appearances such as benign tissue migration, resection VOIDs resembling an intrinsic mass, and true recurrence. CEUS is thus strongly recommended for secondary surveillance following HCC and ICC resection. The second conclusion evaluates the inclusion of resection sites into the CEUS LI-RADS TRA algorithm for ablative therapies. In this regard, we believe that our study was highly successful, improving the perspective of all our staff as to what is important in the assessment of the post-surgical liver on CEUS and the method whereby this information is communicated to our referring clinicians.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5761 - 5773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144218412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-04DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05027-2
Garima Suman, Bohyun Kim, Adam Froemming, Boyd Viers, Ashish Khandelwal
Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy, which are standard treatments for prostate cancer, are associated with various short- and long-term complications. Early post-prostatectomy complications include bleeding, vesicourethral anastomotic dehiscence, and anorectal injury, while late sequelae include urinary incontinence, anastomotic stenosis, urinary strictures and fistulas, osteomyelitis, and cancer recurrence. Radiation therapy can lead to bladder and bowel toxicity and, in rare cases, secondary malignancies. Imaging plays a crucial role in detecting and managing these complications. Multiphasic CT is preferred for detecting acute hemorrhage and urine leaks, while MRI is the modality of choice for evaluating urinary strictures, fistulas, and recurrent malignancies. Dynamic MR cystourethrography further enhances the assessment of urethral mobility and function, improves the detection of urinary fistula, and helps in surgical planning. MRI and PSMA PET imaging are key modalities for detecting post-treatment recurrence. As survival rates continue to improve for prostate cancer patients, the emphasis is shifting toward preserving quality of life and managing long-term treatment-related complications. In this review, we present a detailed overview of post-treatment surgical bed complications, emphasizing the role of various imaging modalities in the detection, characterization, and management of these complications.
{"title":"Imaging of surgical bed complications after prostatectomy and radiation therapy","authors":"Garima Suman, Bohyun Kim, Adam Froemming, Boyd Viers, Ashish Khandelwal","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05027-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05027-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy, which are standard treatments for prostate cancer, are associated with various short- and long-term complications. Early post-prostatectomy complications include bleeding, vesicourethral anastomotic dehiscence, and anorectal injury, while late sequelae include urinary incontinence, anastomotic stenosis, urinary strictures and fistulas, osteomyelitis, and cancer recurrence. Radiation therapy can lead to bladder and bowel toxicity and, in rare cases, secondary malignancies. Imaging plays a crucial role in detecting and managing these complications. Multiphasic CT is preferred for detecting acute hemorrhage and urine leaks, while MRI is the modality of choice for evaluating urinary strictures, fistulas, and recurrent malignancies. Dynamic MR cystourethrography further enhances the assessment of urethral mobility and function, improves the detection of urinary fistula, and helps in surgical planning. MRI and PSMA PET imaging are key modalities for detecting post-treatment recurrence. As survival rates continue to improve for prostate cancer patients, the emphasis is shifting toward preserving quality of life and managing long-term treatment-related complications. In this review, we present a detailed overview of post-treatment surgical bed complications, emphasizing the role of various imaging modalities in the detection, characterization, and management of these complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5984 - 5997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144218411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-03DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05028-1
Stephane Chartier, Hina Arif-Tiwari, Shahad Al-Bayati, Michelle Anthony, Martin Dufwenberg, Gebran Abboud, Mohammad Khreiss
Choledochal cysts are congenital anomalies of the bile ducts that are most often diagnosed in the pediatric population but are increasingly being detected in adults presenting with complications related to an underlying cyst burden and biliary malignancy. The Modified Todani Classification is commonly used to subdivide choledochal cysts into five groups based on anatomical locations and morphological characteristics. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) demonstrate high diagnostic performance for choledochal malformations and early detection of cyst complications. MRI and MRCP are crucial for preoperative planning to delineate anatomy and exclude malignant transformation. This pictorial review will illustrate the spectrum of MR imaging for Todani classification of bile duct cysts and describe the various complications of choledochal cysts in adults.
{"title":"Choledochal cysts in adults: magnetic resonance imaging of cyst complications and review of management strategies","authors":"Stephane Chartier, Hina Arif-Tiwari, Shahad Al-Bayati, Michelle Anthony, Martin Dufwenberg, Gebran Abboud, Mohammad Khreiss","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05028-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05028-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Choledochal cysts are congenital anomalies of the bile ducts that are most often diagnosed in the pediatric population but are increasingly being detected in adults presenting with complications related to an underlying cyst burden and biliary malignancy. The Modified Todani Classification is commonly used to subdivide choledochal cysts into five groups based on anatomical locations and morphological characteristics. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) demonstrate high diagnostic performance for choledochal malformations and early detection of cyst complications. MRI and MRCP are crucial for preoperative planning to delineate anatomy and exclude malignant transformation. This pictorial review will illustrate the spectrum of MR imaging for Todani classification of bile duct cysts and describe the various complications of choledochal cysts in adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5833 - 5844"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144210694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-03DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05006-7
Mahdi Hamade, David H. Ballard, Mark J. Hoegger, Yashant Aswani, Anup S. Shetty, Rachita Khot, Joseph E. Ippolito, Cary L. Siegel, Benjamin S. Srivastava, Ahmad Hussain, Malak Itani
Cystic lesions of the genitourinary (GU) tract in the pelvis represent a diverse group of entities that can be challenging to characterize due to overlapping anatomy and variable imaging appearances. While most lesions are benign, accurate identification is critical to guide appropriate clinical management and avoid misdiagnosis. This review presents a comprehensive, image-rich overview of cystic pelvic lesions, focusing on the anterior and middle compartments in both male and female patients. Imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI each provide distinct advantages depending on the clinical context and lesion characteristics. Key entities include bladder, urethral, and ureteral diverticula; urachal anomalies; prostatic utricle and Müllerian duct cysts; seminal vesicle and ejaculatory duct cysts; Gartner duct and Bartholin gland cysts; and infectious processes. Less common pathologies, such as lymphangiomas, benign cystic tumors, and mimics of cystic lesions, including bulking agents, hydrogel spacers, hernias, and cystic degeneration of solid tumors, are also addressed. This manuscript offers practical pearls and highlights potential pitfalls in the evaluation of cystic GU lesions. Familiarity with typical imaging features and potential mimics is essential to ensure diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Cystic genitourinary lesions in the pelvis: pearls and pitfalls","authors":"Mahdi Hamade, David H. Ballard, Mark J. Hoegger, Yashant Aswani, Anup S. Shetty, Rachita Khot, Joseph E. Ippolito, Cary L. Siegel, Benjamin S. Srivastava, Ahmad Hussain, Malak Itani","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05006-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05006-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cystic lesions of the genitourinary (GU) tract in the pelvis represent a diverse group of entities that can be challenging to characterize due to overlapping anatomy and variable imaging appearances. While most lesions are benign, accurate identification is critical to guide appropriate clinical management and avoid misdiagnosis. This review presents a comprehensive, image-rich overview of cystic pelvic lesions, focusing on the anterior and middle compartments in both male and female patients. Imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI each provide distinct advantages depending on the clinical context and lesion characteristics. Key entities include bladder, urethral, and ureteral diverticula; urachal anomalies; prostatic utricle and Müllerian duct cysts; seminal vesicle and ejaculatory duct cysts; Gartner duct and Bartholin gland cysts; and infectious processes. Less common pathologies, such as lymphangiomas, benign cystic tumors, and mimics of cystic lesions, including bulking agents, hydrogel spacers, hernias, and cystic degeneration of solid tumors, are also addressed. This manuscript offers practical pearls and highlights potential pitfalls in the evaluation of cystic GU lesions. Familiarity with typical imaging features and potential mimics is essential to ensure diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5963 - 5983"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144210696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-03DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05017-4
Nicole V. Warrington, Anup Shetty, Matthew T. Heller, Cole Thompson, Nelly Tan, Khaled M. Elsayes, Margarita Revzin, Maria Zulfiqar
Oncological imaging in the abdomen and pelvis can be complex. Several imaging pitfalls and mimics of oncology can create diagnostic uncertainty. A pitfall is a malignancy that is missed, either not visualized or misdiagnosed as a benign finding. A mimic is a benign entity that is misinterpreted as malignancy. This article will provide a case-based review with teaching tips to avoid various oncologic pitfalls and mimics in the abdomen and pelvis. The categories of pitfalls to be reviewed include spontaneous regression of primary malignancy, neoplasms resembling benign entities, eye-catching benign pathology with superimposed malignancy, false negative tumor markers, infiltrative malignancy, nuances with disease progression, and concomitant complications. The categories of mimics to be reviewed include benign neoplasms with aggressive growth pattern, benign entities with malignancy appearing enhancement patterns, infectious/inflammatory conditions, iatrogenic/foreign body reactions, and anatomic structures. Insight regarding certain pitfalls and mimics can help the radiologist improve diagnostic precision.
{"title":"Oncologic pitfalls and mimics in the abdomen and pelvis","authors":"Nicole V. Warrington, Anup Shetty, Matthew T. Heller, Cole Thompson, Nelly Tan, Khaled M. Elsayes, Margarita Revzin, Maria Zulfiqar","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05017-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05017-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Oncological imaging in the abdomen and pelvis can be complex. Several imaging pitfalls and mimics of oncology can create diagnostic uncertainty. A pitfall is a malignancy that is missed, either not visualized or misdiagnosed as a benign finding. A mimic is a benign entity that is misinterpreted as malignancy. This article will provide a case-based review with teaching tips to avoid various oncologic pitfalls and mimics in the abdomen and pelvis. The categories of pitfalls to be reviewed include spontaneous regression of primary malignancy, neoplasms resembling benign entities, eye-catching benign pathology with superimposed malignancy, false negative tumor markers, infiltrative malignancy, nuances with disease progression, and concomitant complications. The categories of mimics to be reviewed include benign neoplasms with aggressive growth pattern, benign entities with malignancy appearing enhancement patterns, infectious/inflammatory conditions, iatrogenic/foreign body reactions, and anatomic structures. Insight regarding certain pitfalls and mimics can help the radiologist improve diagnostic precision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"6235 - 6250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144210698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-03DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05018-3
Hiroaki Takahashi, Hirotsugu Nakai, Karla V. Ballman, Derek J. Lomas, Lance A. Mynderse, Akira Kawashima, Steve Huang, Jordan D. Legout, Jason R. Young, Mattew P. Thorpe, Geoffrey B. Johnson, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Alton O. Sartor, Naoki Takahashi
Purpose
To localize PSMA-avid lesions identified by PSMA PET-CT on separately performed prostate MRI and evaluate imaging findings on fused PET-CT/MRI.
Methods
Patients without prior history of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa: Gleason score [GS] 3 + 4 or higher) who had (1) PI-RADS 3 on prostate MRI between 2021 and 2023, (2) MRI/US fusion targeted biopsy for PI-RADS 3 lesion(s) and systemic biopsy, and (3) subsequent PSMA PET-CT were identified. PSMA PET-CT images were fused onto prostate MRI. PI-RADS 3 lesions were categorized by PRIMARY score. Discordant PSMA-avid lesions with PRIMARY scores 2–5 outside of PI-RADS 3 lesions were identified. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the proportion of csPCa on targeted biopsy between PSMA-positive (PRIMARY score 3 or more) and PSMA-negative (PRIMARY score 1 or 2) PI-RADS 3 lesions. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
30 patients (mean age 67 years) with 38 PI-RADS 3 lesions were identified. 29 patients had csPCa, and one patient had GS 6. 22 PI-RADS 3 lesions were PSMA-positive (PRIMARY score 3 or more), of which 18 (81.8%) were csPCa on targeted biopsy; 16 PI-RADS 3 lesions were PSMA-negative, of which 4 (25.0%) were csPCa on targeted biopsy (p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity for the presence of csPCa on targeted biopsy was 81.8% and 75.0%. Out of 30 patients, 12 (40.0%) had 16 discordant PSMA-avid (PRIMARY score 2 or more) lesions and 10 patients had 10 discordant PSMA-positive lesions outside PI-RADS 3 lesions In 5 of those 12 (41.7%), discordant PSMA-avid lesions had higher PRIMARY score than PI-RADS 3 lesions. In 4 of those 5 (80%), systemic biopsy showed higher GS than targeted biopsy.
Conclusion
Lesion-level analysis showed PSMA-positive PI-RADS 3 lesions had higher probability of csPCa than PSMA-negative PI-RADS 3 lesions. Discordant PSMA-avid lesions with higher PRIMARY score than that of PI-RADS 3 lesions often represented another more aggressive focus not initially identified on MRI.
{"title":"Localization of PSMA-avid lesions on PSMA PET-CT on prostate MRI in patients with PI-RADS 3","authors":"Hiroaki Takahashi, Hirotsugu Nakai, Karla V. Ballman, Derek J. Lomas, Lance A. Mynderse, Akira Kawashima, Steve Huang, Jordan D. Legout, Jason R. Young, Mattew P. Thorpe, Geoffrey B. Johnson, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Alton O. Sartor, Naoki Takahashi","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05018-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05018-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To localize PSMA-avid lesions identified by PSMA PET-CT on separately performed prostate MRI and evaluate imaging findings on fused PET-CT/MRI.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients without prior history of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa: Gleason score [GS] 3 + 4 or higher) who had (1) PI-RADS 3 on prostate MRI between 2021 and 2023, (2) MRI/US fusion targeted biopsy for PI-RADS 3 lesion(s) and systemic biopsy, and (3) subsequent PSMA PET-CT were identified. PSMA PET-CT images were fused onto prostate MRI. PI-RADS 3 lesions were categorized by PRIMARY score. Discordant PSMA-avid lesions with PRIMARY scores 2–5 outside of PI-RADS 3 lesions were identified. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the proportion of csPCa on targeted biopsy between PSMA-positive (PRIMARY score 3 or more) and PSMA-negative (PRIMARY score 1 or 2) PI-RADS 3 lesions. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>30 patients (mean age 67 years) with 38 PI-RADS 3 lesions were identified. 29 patients had csPCa, and one patient had GS 6. 22 PI-RADS 3 lesions were PSMA-positive (PRIMARY score 3 or more), of which 18 (81.8%) were csPCa on targeted biopsy; 16 PI-RADS 3 lesions were PSMA-negative, of which 4 (25.0%) were csPCa on targeted biopsy (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity for the presence of csPCa on targeted biopsy was 81.8% and 75.0%. Out of 30 patients, 12 (40.0%) had 16 discordant PSMA-avid (PRIMARY score 2 or more) lesions and 10 patients had 10 discordant PSMA-positive lesions outside PI-RADS 3 lesions In 5 of those 12 (41.7%), discordant PSMA-avid lesions had higher PRIMARY score than PI-RADS 3 lesions. In 4 of those 5 (80%), systemic biopsy showed higher GS than targeted biopsy.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lesion-level analysis showed PSMA-positive PI-RADS 3 lesions had higher probability of csPCa than PSMA-negative PI-RADS 3 lesions. Discordant PSMA-avid lesions with higher PRIMARY score than that of PI-RADS 3 lesions often represented another more aggressive focus not initially identified on MRI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5948 - 5962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144210697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-03DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05034-3
Se Jin Choi, Dong Hwan Kim, Sang Hyun Choi, So Yeon Kim, Seung Soo Lee, Jae Ho Byun, Hyung Jin Won, Yong Moon Shin
Purpose
To compare the clinical, MRI, and prognostic features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) between patients with and without hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 211 patients with ICCA who underwent preoperative MRI and curative-intent surgical resection between 2015 and 2018. Two radiologists independently reviewed MRI features. Clinicopathologic and MRI characteristics were compared according to HBV status. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Recurrence rates were compared according to tumor site, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of intrahepatic recurrence.
Results
Among the 211 patients (mean age, 63.4 ± 10.5 years; 126 men), 81 (38.4%) were HBV-positive and 130 (61.6%) were HBV-negative. The purely mass-forming type of ICCA was more common in the HBV-positive group (91.4% vs. 76.9%; p = 0.007), whereas combined types were more frequent in the HBV-negative group. On MRI, peripheral tumor location was more frequent in the HBV-positive group (55.5% vs. 34.6%; p = 0.011), while bile duct invasion/dilatation (p < 0.001), secondary confluence involvement (p = 0.005), and periductal tumor infiltration (p = 0.030) were less common. Rim or non-rim arterial-phase enhancement (85.2% vs. 68.5%; p = 0.024) and radiologically-evident cirrhosis (19.8% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.017) were more frequent in HBV-positive patients. Although RFS and OS did not significantly differ between the groups (p ≥ 0.327), the intrahepatic recurrence rate was significantly higher in the HBV-positive group (37.0% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.029). HBV positivity was also identified as an independent predictor of intrahepatic recurrence (odds ratio, 1.93; p = 0.047).
Conclusion
HBV-associated ICCA demonstrates distinct MRI features and is associated with a higher rate of intrahepatic recurrence following curative resection.
目的:比较乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染患者和非HBV感染患者肝内胆管癌(ICCA)的临床、MRI和预后特征。方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年至2018年间接受术前MRI和治疗目的手术切除的211例ICCA患者。两名放射科医生独立审查了MRI特征。根据HBV状态比较临床病理和MRI特征。采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验评估无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。根据肿瘤部位比较复发率,并采用logistic回归分析确定肝内复发的独立预测因素。结果:211例患者中,平均年龄63.4±10.5岁;126名男性),81名(38.4%)hbv阳性,130名(61.6%)hbv阴性。纯团块形成型ICCA在hbv阳性组中更为常见(91.4% vs. 76.9%;p = 0.007),而合并型在hbv阴性组中更为常见。在MRI上,外周肿瘤在hbv阳性组更常见(55.5% vs. 34.6%;p = 0.011),而胆管侵犯/扩张(p结论:hbv相关的ICCA表现出明显的MRI特征,并与根治性切除后肝内复发率较高相关。
{"title":"Comparison of MRI and prognostic features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between patients with and without hepatitis B virus infection","authors":"Se Jin Choi, Dong Hwan Kim, Sang Hyun Choi, So Yeon Kim, Seung Soo Lee, Jae Ho Byun, Hyung Jin Won, Yong Moon Shin","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05034-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05034-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the clinical, MRI, and prognostic features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) between patients with and without hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 211 patients with ICCA who underwent preoperative MRI and curative-intent surgical resection between 2015 and 2018. Two radiologists independently reviewed MRI features. Clinicopathologic and MRI characteristics were compared according to HBV status. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Recurrence rates were compared according to tumor site, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of intrahepatic recurrence.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 211 patients (mean age, 63.4 ± 10.5 years; 126 men), 81 (38.4%) were HBV-positive and 130 (61.6%) were HBV-negative. The purely mass-forming type of ICCA was more common in the HBV-positive group (91.4% vs. 76.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.007), whereas combined types were more frequent in the HBV-negative group. On MRI, peripheral tumor location was more frequent in the HBV-positive group (55.5% vs. 34.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.011), while bile duct invasion/dilatation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), secondary confluence involvement (<i>p</i> = 0.005), and periductal tumor infiltration (<i>p</i> = 0.030) were less common. Rim or non-rim arterial-phase enhancement (85.2% vs. 68.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.024) and radiologically-evident cirrhosis (19.8% vs. 8.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.017) were more frequent in HBV-positive patients. Although RFS and OS did not significantly differ between the groups (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.327), the intrahepatic recurrence rate was significantly higher in the HBV-positive group (37.0% vs. 23.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.029). HBV positivity was also identified as an independent predictor of intrahepatic recurrence (odds ratio, 1.93; <i>p</i> = 0.047).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>HBV-associated ICCA demonstrates distinct MRI features and is associated with a higher rate of intrahepatic recurrence following curative resection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 12","pages":"5820 - 5832"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144210695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}