Computed tomography (CT) is a cornerstone of abdominal imaging, playing a vital role in accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment planning, and disease monitoring. The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in imaging has introduced deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) techniques that enhance image quality, reduce radiation dose, and improve workflow efficiency. Traditional image reconstruction methods, including filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR), have limitations such as high noise levels and artificial image texture. DLR overcomes these challenges by leveraging convolutional neural networks to generate high-fidelity images while preserving anatomical details. Recent advances in vendor-specific and vendor-agnostic DLR algorithms, such as TrueFidelity, AiCE, and Precise Image, have demonstrated significant improvements in contrast-to-noise ratio, lesion detection, and diagnostic confidence across various abdominal organs, including the liver, pancreas, and kidneys. Furthermore, AI extends beyond image reconstruction to applications such as low contrast lesion detection, quantitative imaging, and workflow optimization, augmenting radiologists’ efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. However, challenges remain in clinical validation, standardization, and widespread adoption. This review explores the principles, advancements, and future directions of AI-driven CT image reconstruction and its expanding role in abdominal imaging.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence (AI) and CT in abdominal imaging: image reconstruction and beyond","authors":"Nisanard Pisuchpen, Shravya Srinivas Rao, Yoshifumi Noda, Sasiprang Kongboonvijit, Abbas Rezaei, Avinash Kambadakone","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05031-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05031-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Computed tomography (CT) is a cornerstone of abdominal imaging, playing a vital role in accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment planning, and disease monitoring. The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in imaging has introduced deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) techniques that enhance image quality, reduce radiation dose, and improve workflow efficiency. Traditional image reconstruction methods, including filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR), have limitations such as high noise levels and artificial image texture. DLR overcomes these challenges by leveraging convolutional neural networks to generate high-fidelity images while preserving anatomical details. Recent advances in vendor-specific and vendor-agnostic DLR algorithms, such as TrueFidelity, AiCE, and Precise Image, have demonstrated significant improvements in contrast-to-noise ratio, lesion detection, and diagnostic confidence across various abdominal organs, including the liver, pancreas, and kidneys. Furthermore, AI extends beyond image reconstruction to applications such as low contrast lesion detection, quantitative imaging, and workflow optimization, augmenting radiologists’ efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. However, challenges remain in clinical validation, standardization, and widespread adoption. This review explores the principles, advancements, and future directions of AI-driven CT image reconstruction and its expanding role in abdominal imaging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"424 - 445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144304333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-16DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05070-z
Alexander Scott, Olivia Hallas, Blake Brandon, Mary Costello, Thomas Dang, Jake Maxfield, Swati Putcha, Jordyn Shah, Ayana Dambaeva, Rayan Abboud, Rekha Mody, Jenny Wu
Expanding imaging indications and increasing patient complexity have created an increasing burden on radiologists for MRI safety related concerns and queries, especially related to implantable devices and foreign bodies. We present a single institution experience identifying deficiencies in radiologist MRI safety education and the subsequent implementation of a module-based training system. Using a pre- and post- intervention analysis, we demonstrated that 39% of institutional radiologists did not feel comfortable making MRI safety related decisions. Following a structure modular educational intervention, 95% of participants reported increased confidence in making MRI safety related decisions. We hope our institutional experience can highlight the need for MRI safety education and serve as a framework for future implementations preventing exam delays, inappropriate cancelations, or adverse safety events.
{"title":"Taking the fear out of MRI safety queries: a modular educational intervention for the experts","authors":"Alexander Scott, Olivia Hallas, Blake Brandon, Mary Costello, Thomas Dang, Jake Maxfield, Swati Putcha, Jordyn Shah, Ayana Dambaeva, Rayan Abboud, Rekha Mody, Jenny Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05070-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05070-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Expanding imaging indications and increasing patient complexity have created an increasing burden on radiologists for MRI safety related concerns and queries, especially related to implantable devices and foreign bodies. We present a single institution experience identifying deficiencies in radiologist MRI safety education and the subsequent implementation of a module-based training system. Using a pre- and post- intervention analysis, we demonstrated that 39% of institutional radiologists did not feel comfortable making MRI safety related decisions. Following a structure modular educational intervention, 95% of participants reported increased confidence in making MRI safety related decisions. We hope our institutional experience can highlight the need for MRI safety education and serve as a framework for future implementations preventing exam delays, inappropriate cancelations, or adverse safety events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"467 - 471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-025-05070-z.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144304335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is the most common cystic neoplasm of the pancreas, encompassing a spectrum from benign to malignant lesions. Recently, the international guidelines for IPMN management were revised as the Kyoto guidelines, emphasizing the critical role of imaging in diagnosis, risk assessment, and surveillance. This article provides a comprehensive review of IPMN based on the updated guidelines, focusing on imaging-related aspects while elucidating the underlying pathological background. We present the three interrelated classification systems for IPMN: anatomical location (branch-duct, main-duct, or mixed type), histological subtype (gastric, intestinal, or pancreatobiliary), and degree of dysplasia (low-grade, high-grade, or associated invasive carcinoma). Understanding these classifications and their correlations is fundamental for imaging-based risk assessment and clinical decision-making. We discuss the two distinct carcinogenesis patterns in IPMN—sequential pattern resulting in high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma associated with IPMN, and concomitant pattern leading to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in IPMN-harboring pancreas. The article reviews high-risk stigmata and worrisome features that guide risk stratification, providing illustrative examples and highlighting potential diagnostic pitfalls. We also examine differential diagnoses including serous cystic neoplasm, mucinous cystic neoplasm, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, pseudocysts, and large duct type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Finally, we review the current management algorithm and surveillance methods recommended by the Kyoto guidelines. This review aims to enhance radiologists' and clinicians' understanding of IPMN by integrating pathological knowledge with imaging findings, emphasizing that while high-risk stigmata are strong predictors of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma, surgical decisions should be individualized considering multiple factors including patient preferences, comorbidities, and life expectancy.
{"title":"Understanding intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm from pathogenesis to risk assessment: a pictorial review based on the kyoto guidelines","authors":"Yuki Tashiro, Mana Kachi, Toshi Hashimoto, Nobuyuki Takeyama, Yasuo Ueda, Jiro Munechika, Yoshimitsu Ohgiya","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04996-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-04996-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is the most common cystic neoplasm of the pancreas, encompassing a spectrum from benign to malignant lesions. Recently, the international guidelines for IPMN management were revised as the Kyoto guidelines, emphasizing the critical role of imaging in diagnosis, risk assessment, and surveillance. This article provides a comprehensive review of IPMN based on the updated guidelines, focusing on imaging-related aspects while elucidating the underlying pathological background. We present the three interrelated classification systems for IPMN: anatomical location (branch-duct, main-duct, or mixed type), histological subtype (gastric, intestinal, or pancreatobiliary), and degree of dysplasia (low-grade, high-grade, or associated invasive carcinoma). Understanding these classifications and their correlations is fundamental for imaging-based risk assessment and clinical decision-making. We discuss the two distinct carcinogenesis patterns in IPMN—sequential pattern resulting in high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma associated with IPMN, and concomitant pattern leading to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in IPMN-harboring pancreas. The article reviews high-risk stigmata and worrisome features that guide risk stratification, providing illustrative examples and highlighting potential diagnostic pitfalls. We also examine differential diagnoses including serous cystic neoplasm, mucinous cystic neoplasm, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, pseudocysts, and large duct type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Finally, we review the current management algorithm and surveillance methods recommended by the Kyoto guidelines. This review aims to enhance radiologists' and clinicians' understanding of IPMN by integrating pathological knowledge with imaging findings, emphasizing that while high-risk stigmata are strong predictors of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma, surgical decisions should be individualized considering multiple factors including patient preferences, comorbidities, and life expectancy.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"78 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144304336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-14DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05039-y
Shekinah D. Dosunmu, Albert Sarno, Eunice Lee, Cassandra Mitchell, Julia Wang, Kyle Shaak
Objective(s)
This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the revised Morphologic Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria for adenomyosis.
Methods
Retrospective review on 96 patients who underwent hysterectomy following ultrasound assessment between 1/3/2020–11/30/2023 for clinical reasons. Two blinded physician reviewers independently evaluated ultrasound images using the modified MUSA criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and interrater reliability of the modified MUSA criteria were determined using hysterectomy specimens as the reference gold standard.
Results
Reviewer 1 found the modified MUSA criteria were found to have a sensitivity of 63.2%, specificity of 65.5%, PPV of 54.4%, and NPV of 73.1%. For reviewer 2, sensitivity was 42.1%, specificity 62.1%, PPV 42.1%, and NPV 62.1%. Interrater agreement using Cohen’s kappa was 72.9%.
Conclusion(s)
The modified MUSA criteria demonstrate moderate sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing adenomyosis. Inter-rater agreement was moderate with 72.9% concordance between ultrasound examiners. While useful in clinical assessment, this study suggests that the modified MUSA criteria lack high specificity and sensitivity, limiting their standalone diagnostic reliability.
{"title":"Validation of the revised MUSA criteria for sonographic detection of adenomyosis","authors":"Shekinah D. Dosunmu, Albert Sarno, Eunice Lee, Cassandra Mitchell, Julia Wang, Kyle Shaak","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05039-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05039-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective(s)</h3><p>This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the revised Morphologic Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria for adenomyosis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective review on 96 patients who underwent hysterectomy following ultrasound assessment between 1/3/2020–11/30/2023 for clinical reasons. Two blinded physician reviewers independently evaluated ultrasound images using the modified MUSA criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and interrater reliability of the modified MUSA criteria were determined using hysterectomy specimens as the reference gold standard.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Reviewer 1 found the modified MUSA criteria were found to have a sensitivity of 63.2%, specificity of 65.5%, PPV of 54.4%, and NPV of 73.1%. For reviewer 2, sensitivity was 42.1%, specificity 62.1%, PPV 42.1%, and NPV 62.1%. Interrater agreement using Cohen’s kappa was 72.9%.</p><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>The modified MUSA criteria demonstrate moderate sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing adenomyosis. Inter-rater agreement was moderate with 72.9% concordance between ultrasound examiners. While useful in clinical assessment, this study suggests that the modified MUSA criteria lack high specificity and sensitivity, limiting their standalone diagnostic reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"274 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144295577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-14DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05068-7
Arwa Elsamny, Amr Wardeh, Alexandra Panyukova, Kamal Kandel, David Lubin, Refky Nicola
PSMA-RADS version 1, introduced by Rowe et al. in 2017, provides a framework for classifying PSMA-targeted PET scans and individual findings based on their likelihood of representing prostate cancer. The system was optimized for findings outside the prostate and was structured as a five-point scale (Rowe et al., Eur Urol 73:485–487, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.027. In 2022, an updated PSMA-RADS version was proposed to refine category definitions, address limitations of the initial version, and enhance its role in guiding clinical decisions. The framework includes both lesion-level and patient-level classifications, offering confidence and probability scores in support of clinical decision-making (Leung et al., EJNMMI Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13550-022-00948-1). This article aims to explore the changes introduced in the updated scale and evaluate their impact on clinical management. It is intended to inform abdominal and general radiologists about recent developments in PSMA-targeted imaging to support multidisciplinary collaboration and patient care.
{"title":"PSMA-RADS 2.0: a revised framework for PSMA-targeted imaging interpretation and clinical decision-making","authors":"Arwa Elsamny, Amr Wardeh, Alexandra Panyukova, Kamal Kandel, David Lubin, Refky Nicola","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05068-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05068-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>PSMA-RADS version 1, introduced by Rowe et al. in 2017, provides a framework for classifying PSMA-targeted PET scans and individual findings based on their likelihood of representing prostate cancer. The system was optimized for findings outside the prostate and was structured as a five-point scale (Rowe et al., Eur Urol 73:485–487, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.027. In 2022, an updated PSMA-RADS version was proposed to refine category definitions, address limitations of the initial version, and enhance its role in guiding clinical decisions. The framework includes both lesion-level and patient-level classifications, offering confidence and probability scores in support of clinical decision-making (Leung et al., EJNMMI Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13550-022-00948-1). This article aims to explore the changes introduced in the updated scale and evaluate their impact on clinical management. It is intended to inform abdominal and general radiologists about recent developments in PSMA-targeted imaging to support multidisciplinary collaboration and patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"180 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144295576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-14DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05061-0
Shilai Wen, Xiulin Xiao
Objective
Accurate segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding anatomical structures is critical for diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome assessment. This study proposes a deep learning-based framework to automate multi-class segmentation in CT images, comparing the performance of four state-of-the-art architectures.
Materials and methods
This retrospective multi-center study included 3265 patients from six institutions. Four deep learning models—UNet, nnU-Net, UNETR, and Swin-UNet—were trained using five-fold cross-validation on data from five centers and tested independently on a sixth center (n = 569). Preprocessing included intensity normalization, voxel resampling, and standardized annotation for six structures: PDAC lesion, pancreas, veins, arteries, pancreatic duct, and common bile duct. Evaluation metrics included Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), directed Hausdorff Distance (dHD), Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD), and Volume Overlap Error (VOE). Statistical comparisons were made using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction.
Results
Swin-UNet outperformed all models with a mean validation DSC of 92.4% and test DSC of 90.8%, showing minimal overfitting. It also achieved the lowest dHD (4.3 mm), ASSD (1.2 mm), and VOE (6.0%) in cross-validation. Per-class DSCs for Swin-UNet were consistently higher across all anatomical targets, including challenging structures like the pancreatic duct (91.0%) and bile duct (91.8%). Statistical analysis confirmed the superiority of Swin-UNet (p < 0.001). All models showed generalization capability, but Swin-UNet provided the most accurate and robust segmentation across datasets.
Conclusions
Transformer-based architectures, particularly Swin-UNet, enable precise and generalizable multi-class segmentation of PDAC and surrounding anatomy. This framework has potential for clinical integration in PDAC diagnosis, staging, and therapy planning.
{"title":"Multi-class transformer-based segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and surrounding structures in CT imaging: a multi-center evaluation","authors":"Shilai Wen, Xiulin Xiao","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05061-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05061-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Accurate segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding anatomical structures is critical for diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome assessment. This study proposes a deep learning-based framework to automate multi-class segmentation in CT images, comparing the performance of four state-of-the-art architectures.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective multi-center study included 3265 patients from six institutions. Four deep learning models—UNet, nnU-Net, UNETR, and Swin-UNet—were trained using five-fold cross-validation on data from five centers and tested independently on a sixth center (<i>n</i> = 569). Preprocessing included intensity normalization, voxel resampling, and standardized annotation for six structures: PDAC lesion, pancreas, veins, arteries, pancreatic duct, and common bile duct. Evaluation metrics included Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), directed Hausdorff Distance (dHD), Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD), and Volume Overlap Error (VOE). Statistical comparisons were made using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Swin-UNet outperformed all models with a mean validation DSC of 92.4% and test DSC of 90.8%, showing minimal overfitting. It also achieved the lowest dHD (4.3 mm), ASSD (1.2 mm), and VOE (6.0%) in cross-validation. Per-class DSCs for Swin-UNet were consistently higher across all anatomical targets, including challenging structures like the pancreatic duct (91.0%) and bile duct (91.8%). Statistical analysis confirmed the superiority of Swin-UNet (<i>p</i> < 0.001). All models showed generalization capability, but Swin-UNet provided the most accurate and robust segmentation across datasets.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Transformer-based architectures, particularly Swin-UNet, enable precise and generalizable multi-class segmentation of PDAC and surrounding anatomy. This framework has potential for clinical integration in PDAC diagnosis, staging, and therapy planning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"63 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144295575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-13DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05058-9
Diogo Miguel Machado Pereira, Alfonso Iglesias Castañon, Mercedes Arias Gonzalez, Alfonso Escobar Villalba, Marlon Francisco Ferreira Polli, Marta Herreros Villaraviz, Jorge Mañas Uxo, Beatriz Nieto Baltar, Angel Nieto Parga
Purpose
This study aims to highlight the major modifications introduced in the FIGO 2023 staging system for endometrial cancer (EC) and their implications for MRI interpretation.
Methods
This pictorial essay was based on a retrospective review of 27 histologically confirmed cases of endometrial cancer (EC) imaged between 2009 and 2023 at our institution. Cases were selected to represent a broad spectrum of FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2023 stages, emphasizing features with updated staging implications. Inclusion criteria were availability of preoperative pelvic MRI and complete histopathological data, including molecular classification when available. Exclusion criteria included suboptimal image quality or incomplete clinical records. MRI assessments were performed by two radiologists with 25 years of experience in gynecological imaging, respectively. In illustrative examples where inter-reader differences arose, consensus was reached after joint review; however, no formal inter-reader agreement statistics (e.g., kappa values) were calculated, given the descriptive nature of the study.
Results
The revised FIGO 2023 staging incorporates molecular subtypes, refines classification criteria, and improves the prognostic significance of MRI findings in EC staging.
Conclusion
The integration of histopathology, molecular markers, and MRI features enhances diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning.
{"title":"The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer: tips for MRI interpretation","authors":"Diogo Miguel Machado Pereira, Alfonso Iglesias Castañon, Mercedes Arias Gonzalez, Alfonso Escobar Villalba, Marlon Francisco Ferreira Polli, Marta Herreros Villaraviz, Jorge Mañas Uxo, Beatriz Nieto Baltar, Angel Nieto Parga","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05058-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05058-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to highlight the major modifications introduced in the FIGO 2023 staging system for endometrial cancer (EC) and their implications for MRI interpretation.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This pictorial essay was based on a retrospective review of 27 histologically confirmed cases of endometrial cancer (EC) imaged between 2009 and 2023 at our institution. Cases were selected to represent a broad spectrum of FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2023 stages, emphasizing features with updated staging implications. Inclusion criteria were availability of preoperative pelvic MRI and complete histopathological data, including molecular classification when available. Exclusion criteria included suboptimal image quality or incomplete clinical records. MRI assessments were performed by two radiologists with 25 years of experience in gynecological imaging, respectively. In illustrative examples where inter-reader differences arose, consensus was reached after joint review; however, no formal inter-reader agreement statistics (e.g., kappa values) were calculated, given the descriptive nature of the study.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The revised FIGO 2023 staging incorporates molecular subtypes, refines classification criteria, and improves the prognostic significance of MRI findings in EC staging.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The integration of histopathology, molecular markers, and MRI features enhances diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"261 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-025-05058-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144288112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The epididymis, a crucial component of the male reproductive system, plays a pivotal role in sperm maturation, transport, and storage. It can be affected by a diverse spectrum of pathologies, including congenital anomalies, infectious and inflammatory diseases, cystic and neoplastic lesions, and traumatic injuries. These conditions can present with overlapping clinical symptoms such as scrotal pain, swelling or infertility, making imaging essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for evaluating epididymal abnormalities due to its high resolution, real-time capabilities, and lack of ionizing radiation. Doppler ultrasound enhances diagnostic precision by assessing vascularity, particularly in inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging provides superior soft tissue contrast and is useful for characterizing complex or indeterminate lesions, while computed tomography is primarily reserved for staging malignancies or evaluating severe trauma. This pictorial review aims to provide an overview of epididymal pathologies by correlating clinical presentation with multimodal imaging findings, predominantly with the use of ultrasound. Emphasis is placed on characteristic imaging features that facilitate differentiation between benign and malignant conditions, guiding radiologists in forming accurate differential diagnoses. By illustrating key pathologic entities, this review seeks to enhance diagnostic confidence and improve clinical decision-making in the assessment of epididymal disorders.
{"title":"The Epididymis: An Ultrasound Primer-What the Radiologist Needs to Know","authors":"Melody Lin, Kamran Ali, Sharon Gordon, Monika Misra, Barak Friedman, Rona Orentlicher Fine","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05000-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05000-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The epididymis, a crucial component of the male reproductive system, plays a pivotal role in sperm maturation, transport, and storage. It can be affected by a diverse spectrum of pathologies, including congenital anomalies, infectious and inflammatory diseases, cystic and neoplastic lesions, and traumatic injuries. These conditions can present with overlapping clinical symptoms such as scrotal pain, swelling or infertility, making imaging essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality for evaluating epididymal abnormalities due to its high resolution, real-time capabilities, and lack of ionizing radiation. Doppler ultrasound enhances diagnostic precision by assessing vascularity, particularly in inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging provides superior soft tissue contrast and is useful for characterizing complex or indeterminate lesions, while computed tomography is primarily reserved for staging malignancies or evaluating severe trauma. This pictorial review aims to provide an overview of epididymal pathologies by correlating clinical presentation with multimodal imaging findings, predominantly with the use of ultrasound. Emphasis is placed on characteristic imaging features that facilitate differentiation between benign and malignant conditions, guiding radiologists in forming accurate differential diagnoses. By illustrating key pathologic entities, this review seeks to enhance diagnostic confidence and improve clinical decision-making in the assessment of epididymal disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"357 - 369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144277952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-12DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-04992-y
Shamar Young, Daniel Zarama, Donna D’Souza, Jafar Golzarian, J. Kyle Anderson
Purpose
The purpose of this single center retrospective study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma(RCC) in patients who have undergone organ or tissue transplant of any kind.
Materials and methods
All patients who underwent cryoablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma at a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. The patients complications, local recurrence free survival (LRFS), overall recurrence free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were reviewed. Patients were separated into transplant and non-transplant cohorts and compared. Given baseline differences in the cohorts a propensity score matching analysis was performed.
Results
In total 148 patients with 160 lesions were included, including 19 lesions in transplant and 141 lesions in non-transplant patients. When comparing the transplant and non-transplant cohorts there was no difference in rate of local recurrence (1(1/19, 5.3%) vs. 12(12/141, 8.5%)(p = 1)) or overall recurrence (1(1/19, 5.3%) vs. 15(15/141, 10.6%)(p = 0. 696)). Kaplan-Meier curves did not show any difference in the LRFS (p = 0.452, Hazard ratio (HR):0.56(95% confidence interval (CI):0.12–2.56) or OS (p = 0.430, HR(95%CI):0.7(0.29–1.7), respectively) between transplant and non-transplant patients. However, the RFS was significantly better in transplant as compared to non-transplant patients (HR:0.35(95%CI: 0.14–0.83), p = 0.018). When a propensity score matching analysis was performed there was no significant difference in LRFS (33.3(interquartile range (IQR):12.9–72.4) vs. 35.1(IQR:17.8–84.4) months, p = 0.881), RFS (33.3(IQR:12.9–72.4) vs. 35.1(IQR:17.8–84.4) months, p = 0.881), or OS (33.3(IQR:12.9–72.4) vs. 38.8(IQR:17.8–84.4) months, p = 1).
Conclusions
Cryoablation of T1 RCC may be as safe and effective in transplant patients as non-transplant patients.
Graphical Abstract
目的:本单中心回顾性研究的目的是评估冷冻消融治疗T1期肾细胞癌(RCC)的安全性和有效性,这些患者接受过任何类型的器官或组织移植。材料和方法:回顾性分析在同一学术机构接受T1期肾细胞癌冷冻消融治疗的所有患者。回顾患者的并发症、局部无复发生存期(LRFS)、总无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。将患者分为移植组和非移植组进行比较。给定队列的基线差异,进行倾向评分匹配分析。结果:共纳入148例患者,病变160个,其中移植病变19个,非移植病变141个。当比较移植组和非移植组时,局部复发率(1(1/19,5.3%)vs. 12(12/141, 8.5%)(p = 1)或总复发率(1(1/19,5.3%)vs. 15(15/141, 10.6%)(p = 0.01)无差异。696))。Kaplan-Meier曲线未显示移植和非移植患者的LRFS (p = 0.452,风险比(HR):0.56(95%可信区间(CI):0.12-2.56)或OS (p = 0.430, HR(95%CI):0.7(0.29-1.7))有任何差异。然而,移植患者的RFS明显优于非移植患者(HR:0.35(95%CI: 0.14-0.83), p = 0.018)。当进行倾向评分匹配分析时,LRFS(33.3(四分位间距(IQR):12.9-72.4) vs 35.1(IQR:17.8-84.4)个月,p = 0.881)、RFS (33.3(IQR:12.9-72.4) vs 35.1(IQR:17.8-84.4)个月,p = 0.881)或OS (33.3(IQR:12.9-72.4) vs 38.8(IQR:17.8-84.4)个月,p = 1)无显著差异。结论:T1期肾细胞癌冷冻消融对移植患者和非移植患者同样安全有效。
{"title":"Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of cryoablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma in organ or tissue transplant recipients as compared to non-transplant patients","authors":"Shamar Young, Daniel Zarama, Donna D’Souza, Jafar Golzarian, J. Kyle Anderson","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04992-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-04992-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this single center retrospective study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma(RCC) in patients who have undergone organ or tissue transplant of any kind.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>All patients who underwent cryoablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma at a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. The patients complications, local recurrence free survival (LRFS), overall recurrence free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were reviewed. Patients were separated into transplant and non-transplant cohorts and compared. Given baseline differences in the cohorts a propensity score matching analysis was performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In total 148 patients with 160 lesions were included, including 19 lesions in transplant and 141 lesions in non-transplant patients. When comparing the transplant and non-transplant cohorts there was no difference in rate of local recurrence (1(1/19, 5.3%) vs. 12(12/141, 8.5%)(<i>p</i> = 1)) or overall recurrence (1(1/19, 5.3%) vs. 15(15/141, 10.6%)(<i>p</i> = 0. 696)). Kaplan-Meier curves did not show any difference in the LRFS (<i>p</i> = 0.452, Hazard ratio (HR):0.56(95% confidence interval (CI):0.12–2.56) or OS (<i>p</i> = 0.430, HR(95%CI):0.7(0.29–1.7), respectively) between transplant and non-transplant patients. However, the RFS was significantly better in transplant as compared to non-transplant patients (HR:0.35(95%CI: 0.14–0.83), <i>p</i> = 0.018). When a propensity score matching analysis was performed there was no significant difference in LRFS (33.3(interquartile range (IQR):12.9–72.4) vs. 35.1(IQR:17.8–84.4) months, <i>p</i> = 0.881), RFS (33.3(IQR:12.9–72.4) vs. 35.1(IQR:17.8–84.4) months, <i>p</i> = 0.881), or OS (33.3(IQR:12.9–72.4) vs. 38.8(IQR:17.8–84.4) months, <i>p</i> = 1).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cryoablation of T1 RCC may be as safe and effective in transplant patients as non-transplant patients.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"171 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144277948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-12DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05048-x
Charissa Kim, Yuval Liberman, Gilad Borisovsky, Diana Litmanovich, Paul VanderLaan, Alexander Brook, Olga R Brook
Purpose
Organizing pneumonia is an inflammatory disorder that may co-exist with malignancy in the lung or elsewhere in the body. We aimed to assess patients with a lung biopsy diagnosis of organizing pneumonia for subsequent pathology confirmation of co-existing malignancy.
Methods
In this retrospective IRB-approved, HIPAA–compliant study, 1314 consecutive patients who underwent CT-guided lung biopsy for suspected lung cancer or metastatic disease from 02/2014 to 04/2022 at a single tertiary referral hospital were identified. In 98/1314 (7.5%) patients, biopsies showed organizing pneumonia, which represented our study cohort. Clinical outcomes, including follow-up imaging and repeat tissue sampling if performed, were evaluated through chart review. Descriptive statistics were calculated.
Results
There were 43/98 (44%) females, mean age was 66 ± 14 years, mean lesion size 2.9 ± 2.1 cm, and 11/98 (11.2%) had prior history of malignancy. Of 98 patients initially diagnosed with organizing pneumonia on lung biopsy, 11 (11.2%) were subsequently found to have malignancy. Among these, 6 (54.5%) had pulmonary metastases and 5 (45.5%) had primary lung cancer. Malignancies were confirmed through percutaneous re-biopsy in 3/11 (27%) and bronchoscopic, endoscopic, or surgical procedures in 8/11 (73%).
Conclusion
Malignancy can co-exist with organizing pneumonia in a substantial percentage of initial lung biopsies. Therefore, repeat tissue sampling should be considered when there is high clinical suspicion of malignancy despite an initial histopathological diagnosis of organizing pneumonia. This is especially relevant in lesions that demonstrate FDG avidity on PET/CT or an increase in size on interval imaging, or in instances where the biopsy core sizes are small or where the biopsies have intraprocedural complications.
目的:组织性肺炎是一种炎症性疾病,可与肺部或身体其他部位的恶性肿瘤共存。我们的目的是评估肺活检诊断为组织性肺炎的患者随后病理确认共存的恶性肿瘤。方法:在这项经irb批准、符合hipaa标准的回顾性研究中,从2014年2月至2022年4月,在一家三级转诊医院,1314名连续接受ct引导肺活检的疑似肺癌或转移性疾病患者被确定。在98/1314例(7.5%)患者中,活检显示组织性肺炎,这代表了我们的研究队列。临床结果,包括随访成像和重复组织采样,通过图表回顾进行评估。进行描述性统计。结果:女性43/98(44%),平均年龄66±14岁,平均病变大小2.9±2.1 cm, 11/98(11.2%)有既往恶性肿瘤病史。98例肺活检最初诊断为组织性肺炎的患者中,11例(11.2%)随后发现恶性肿瘤。其中肺转移6例(54.5%),原发肺癌5例(45.5%)。3/11(27%)通过经皮再活检确诊恶性肿瘤,8/11(73%)通过支气管镜、内窥镜或外科手术确诊恶性肿瘤。结论:在初始肺活检中,恶性肿瘤可与组织性肺炎共存。因此,当临床高度怀疑恶性肿瘤时,尽管最初的组织病理学诊断为组织性肺炎,但应考虑重复组织取样。这尤其适用于PET/CT显示FDG密集或间隔成像显示尺寸增大的病变,或活检核尺寸较小或活检有术中并发症的病变。
{"title":"Incidence of malignancy in lung lesions initially classified as organizing pneumonia on CT-guided biopsies","authors":"Charissa Kim, Yuval Liberman, Gilad Borisovsky, Diana Litmanovich, Paul VanderLaan, Alexander Brook, Olga R Brook","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-05048-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00261-025-05048-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Organizing pneumonia is an inflammatory disorder that may co-exist with malignancy in the lung or elsewhere in the body. We aimed to assess patients with a lung biopsy diagnosis of organizing pneumonia for subsequent pathology confirmation of co-existing malignancy.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective IRB-approved, HIPAA–compliant study, 1314 consecutive patients who underwent CT-guided lung biopsy for suspected lung cancer or metastatic disease from 02/2014 to 04/2022 at a single tertiary referral hospital were identified. In 98/1314 (7.5%) patients, biopsies showed organizing pneumonia, which represented our study cohort. Clinical outcomes, including follow-up imaging and repeat tissue sampling if performed, were evaluated through chart review. Descriptive statistics were calculated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 43/98 (44%) females, mean age was 66 ± 14 years, mean lesion size 2.9 ± 2.1 cm, and 11/98 (11.2%) had prior history of malignancy. Of 98 patients initially diagnosed with organizing pneumonia on lung biopsy, 11 (11.2%) were subsequently found to have malignancy. Among these, 6 (54.5%) had pulmonary metastases and 5 (45.5%) had primary lung cancer. Malignancies were confirmed through percutaneous re-biopsy in 3/11 (27%) and bronchoscopic, endoscopic, or surgical procedures in 8/11 (73%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Malignancy can co-exist with organizing pneumonia in a substantial percentage of initial lung biopsies. Therefore, repeat tissue sampling should be considered when there is high clinical suspicion of malignancy despite an initial histopathological diagnosis of organizing pneumonia. This is especially relevant in lesions that demonstrate FDG avidity on PET/CT or an increase in size on interval imaging, or in instances where the biopsy core sizes are small or where the biopsies have intraprocedural complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"51 1","pages":"379 - 387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144277951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}