首页 > 最新文献

Addictive behaviors最新文献

英文 中文
Longitudinal patterns of alcohol and cannabis use among US young adults: Correlates and implications for problematic health outcomes 美国青少年使用酒精和大麻的纵向模式:问题健康结果的相关因素和影响。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108123

Introduction

Alcohol and cannabis use are common during young adulthood. Less is known regarding correlates of alcohol-cannabis use patterns and related problematic health outcomes.

Methods

Using longitudinal survey data (Fall 2018, 2019, 2020) from 2,194 young adults (YAs; ages 18–34), bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regressions examined: (1) Wave 1 (W1) sociodemographics and psychosocial factors (i.e., adverse childhood experiences [ACEs], depressive symptoms, personality traits, parent and peer alcohol and cannabis use) in relation to W3 past-month use group (i.e., use of neither, alcohol only, cannabis only, both/co-use); and (2) W3 use group in relation to W5 problematic alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test), problematic cannabis use (Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test), and depressive/anxiety symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire – 4 item).

Results

Overall, 42.3% reported W3 alcohol-only use, 34.9% co-use, 17.8% no use, and 5.0% cannabis-only use. Those reporting W3 co-use reported greater W1 extraversion, openness, friend alcohol/cannabis use, and were more likely to report parent cannabis use (vs. no use); reported less conscientiousness, greater friend cannabis use, and were more likely to report depressive symptoms and parent cannabis use (vs. alcohol-only use); and reported greater friend alcohol use, and were more likely to report parent alcohol use (vs. cannabis-only use). W3 co-use was associated with higher odds of W5 problematic alcohol use (vs. alcohol-only use) and problematic cannabis use (vs. cannabis-only use).

Conclusions

Substance use messaging and interventions should consider YAs’ alcohol-cannabis co-use and the unique correlates of such use.

简介酗酒和吸食大麻是青年时期的常见现象。人们对酒精和大麻使用模式的相关性以及相关的健康问题结果知之甚少:利用 2,194 名年轻成年人(YAs;18-34 岁)的纵向调查数据(2018 年秋季、2019 年秋季和 2020 年秋季),双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归研究了:(1) 第 1 波(W1)社会人口统计学和心理社会因素(即不良童年经历 [ACE]、抑郁症状、人格特质、父母和同伴的酒精和大麻使用情况)与第 3 波上月使用群体(即:既不使用也不使用、仅使用酒精、仅使用大麻)的关系、(2) W3 使用组与 W5 有问题的酒精使用(酒精使用障碍鉴定测试)、有问题的大麻使用(大麻使用障碍鉴定测试)和抑郁/焦虑症状(患者健康问卷 - 4 项)的关系:总体而言,42.3%的人只使用 W3 酒精,34.9%的人共同使用,17.8%的人不使用,5.0%的人只使用大麻。那些报告 W3 级共同使用的人报告了更高的 W1 级外向性、开放性、朋友饮酒/吸食大麻,并且更有可能报告父母吸食大麻(与不使用相比);报告了更低的自觉性、更多的朋友吸食大麻,并且更有可能报告抑郁症状和父母吸食大麻(与只饮酒相比);报告了更多的朋友饮酒,并且更有可能报告父母饮酒(与只吸食大麻相比)。W3共同使用与W5问题性饮酒(与仅饮酒相比)和问题性使用大麻(与仅使用大麻相比)的几率更高相关:药物使用信息和干预措施应考虑到青少年酒精和大麻的共同使用以及这种使用的独特相关性。
{"title":"Longitudinal patterns of alcohol and cannabis use among US young adults: Correlates and implications for problematic health outcomes","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108123","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108123","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Alcohol and cannabis use are common during young adulthood. Less is known regarding correlates of alcohol-cannabis use patterns and related problematic health outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using longitudinal survey data (Fall 2018, 2019, 2020) from 2,194 young adults (YAs; ages 18–34), bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regressions examined: (1) Wave 1 (W1) sociodemographics and psychosocial factors (i.e., adverse childhood experiences [ACEs], depressive symptoms, personality traits, parent and peer alcohol and cannabis use) in relation to W3 past-month use group (i.e., use of neither, alcohol only, cannabis only, both/co-use); and (2) W3 use group in relation to W5 problematic alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test), problematic cannabis use (Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test), and depressive/anxiety symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire – 4 item).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 42.3% reported W3 alcohol-only use, 34.9% co-use, 17.8% no use, and 5.0% cannabis-only use. Those reporting W3 co-use reported greater W1 extraversion, openness, friend alcohol/cannabis use, and were more likely to report parent cannabis use (vs. no use); reported less conscientiousness, greater friend cannabis use, and were more likely to report depressive symptoms and parent cannabis use (vs. alcohol-only use); and reported greater friend alcohol use, and were more likely to report parent alcohol use (vs. cannabis-only use). W3 co-use was associated with higher odds of W5 problematic alcohol use (vs. alcohol-only use) and problematic cannabis use (vs. cannabis-only use).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Substance use messaging and interventions should consider YAs’ alcohol-cannabis co-use and the unique correlates of such use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141914787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
My friends made me do it: Peer influences and different types of vaping in adolescence 是朋友们逼我的:青少年时期的同伴影响和不同类型的吸食行为。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108128

Vaping is one of the most common forms of substance use among adolescents. Social influences play a key role in the decision to use substances and frequency of use during adolescence, and vaping is no exception. Using a sample of 891 adolescents across two time points (Mage = 15.1 and Mage = 17.2) in this pre-registered study, we explored whether the frequency of vaping nicotine and the frequency of vaping marijuana at age 17 were related to concurrent reports of resistance to peer influence (RPI), perceptions of friends vaping, and perceptions of classmates vaping. Then, we investigated whether resistance to peer influence reported at age 15 was similarly related to age 17 vaping of both substances. Higher RPI at both ages 15 and 17 was associated with a higher probability of abstaining from vaping both substances but was not related to the frequency of vaping among those who vaped. Perceiving that a higher proportion of friends − but not classmates − vaped was associated with a lower probability of abstaining and a greater frequency of vaping among those who vape (for both substances). Higher RPI had an attenuating effect on the relation between perceptions of vaping among peers and an adolescent’s own vaping behavior, but that differed by age and peer group (e.g., friends vs. classmates). Overestimation about the prevalence of classmate vaping may have played a role in the findings, but our results suggest that interventions to strengthen peer resistance across adolescence are warranted.

吸食毒品是青少年使用药物的最常见形式之一。社会影响在青少年决定使用药物和使用频率方面起着关键作用,吸食电子烟也不例外。在这项预先登记的研究中,我们使用了两个时间点(Mage = 15.1 和 Mage = 17.2)的 891 个青少年样本,探讨了 17 岁时吸食尼古丁的频率和吸食大麻的频率是否与同时报告的抵制同伴影响(RPI)、对朋友吸食大麻的看法以及对同学吸食大麻的看法有关。然后,我们研究了 15 岁时报告的抵制同伴影响是否与 17 岁时吸食这两种物质有类似关系。15 岁和 17 岁时较高的 RPI 与较高的不吸食这两种物质的概率有关,但与吸食者的吸食频率无关。认为朋友(而非同学)吸食的比例越高,戒烟的概率越低,吸食者吸食的频率越高(两种物质)。较高的 RPI 对同龄人对吸食大麻的看法与青少年自身吸食大麻行为之间的关系有减弱作用,但这种作用因年龄和同龄人群体(如朋友与同学)而异。对同学吸食毒品的普遍性估计过高可能是导致研究结果的一个原因,但我们的研究结果表明,有必要在青少年时期采取干预措施来加强同伴间的抵制。
{"title":"My friends made me do it: Peer influences and different types of vaping in adolescence","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108128","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108128","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vaping is one of the most common forms of substance use among adolescents. Social influences play a key role in the decision to use substances and frequency of use during adolescence, and vaping is no exception. Using a sample of 891 adolescents across two time points (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 15.1 and <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 17.2) in this pre-registered study, we explored whether the frequency of vaping nicotine and the frequency of vaping marijuana at age 17 were related to concurrent reports of resistance to peer influence (RPI), perceptions of friends vaping, and perceptions of classmates vaping. Then, we investigated whether resistance to peer influence reported at age 15 was similarly related to age 17 vaping of both substances. Higher RPI at both ages 15 and 17 was associated with a higher probability of abstaining from vaping both substances but was not related to the frequency of vaping among those who vaped. Perceiving that a higher proportion of friends − but not classmates − vaped was associated with a lower probability of abstaining and a greater frequency of vaping among those who vape (for both substances). Higher RPI had an attenuating effect on the relation between perceptions of vaping among peers and an adolescent’s own vaping behavior, but that differed by age and peer group (e.g., friends vs. classmates). Overestimation about the prevalence of classmate vaping may have played a role in the findings, but our results suggest that interventions to strengthen peer resistance across adolescence are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of exercise on cravings levels in individuals with drug dependency: A systematic review 运动对药物依赖者渴求水平的影响:系统综述。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108127

Objective

This systematic review aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of exercise-based interventions in reducing craving levels among individuals with drug dependency.

Methods

This study included randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of exercise on craving levels in individuals with drug dependence. We searched for relevant literature in PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, China Biomedicine, Wanfang, and VIP databases from their inception until July 2024. Two researchers independently reviewed the literature. The quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the GRADE profiler software was utilized to evaluate the strength of the evidence. A qualitative synthesis was performed to describe the findings.

Results

We included 26 studies involving a total of 1381 participants, with 787 in the experimental group and 594 in the control group. These studies were mainly conducted in China, the United States, and the United Kingdom, and were published mostly after 2018. The participants had typically been dependent on drugs for more than 5 years. The review found that exercise interventions were feasible and well-accepted, and effectively reduced drug cravings. Among the 26 studies, 22 showed positive outcomes in reducing cravings. The type of exercise appears to be a crucial factor. Aerobic exercises were more effective than resistance exercises. Out of 18 studies that included aerobic exercises, 17 reported significant reductions in cravings. In contrast, among the 4 studies that included resistance exercises, 3 did not find a significant impact on cravings.

Conclusion

Exercise is highly feasible and acceptable, significantly contributing to the reduction of drug cravings among individuals with drug dependency. The specific type of exercise appears to be a key determinant of the intervention's effectiveness. Aerobic exercises were more effective than resistance exercises. The evidence supporting these findings is of high quality, with an average score of 6.92 on the PEDro scale.

Others

The research was supported by the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Human Performance, with the project number 11DZ2261100. Registration details can be found on PROSPEO under the number CRD42024525700 at www.crd.york.ac.uk.

目的本系统综述旨在评估以运动为基础的干预措施在降低药物依赖者渴求水平方面的可行性、可接受性和有效性:本研究纳入了调查运动对药物依赖者渴求水平影响的随机对照试验。我们在 PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、CNKI、China Biomedicine、Wanfang 和 VIP 数据库中检索了从开始到 2024 年 7 月的相关文献。两名研究人员独立审阅了这些文献。研究质量采用 PEDro 量表进行评估,并使用 GRADE profiler 软件评估证据的强度。对研究结果进行了定性综述:我们纳入了 26 项研究,共有 1381 人参与,其中实验组 787 人,对照组 594 人。这些研究主要在中国、美国和英国进行,大多发表于2018年之后。参与者对药物的依赖时间通常超过5年。综述发现,运动干预是可行的,也是被广泛接受的,能有效减少对毒品的渴求。在这26项研究中,有22项研究在减少渴求方面取得了积极成果。运动类型似乎是一个关键因素。有氧运动比阻力运动更有效。在 18 项包含有氧运动的研究中,有 17 项报告称药物渴求明显减少。相比之下,在 4 项包含阻力运动的研究中,有 3 项未发现对渴望有显著影响:结论:运动是非常可行和可接受的,对减少药物依赖者的药物渴求有很大帮助。具体的运动类型似乎是决定干预效果的关键因素。有氧运动比阻力运动更有效。支持这些研究结果的证据质量很高,在PEDro量表中平均得分为6.92分:本研究得到了上海市人体机能重点实验室的支持,项目编号为 11DZ2261100。注册信息可在 PROSPEO 上找到,编号为 CRD42024525700,网址为 www.crd.york.ac.uk。
{"title":"Effect of exercise on cravings levels in individuals with drug dependency: A systematic review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108127","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108127","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This systematic review aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of exercise-based interventions in reducing craving levels among individuals with drug dependency.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of exercise on craving levels in individuals with drug dependence. We searched for relevant literature in PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, China Biomedicine, Wanfang, and VIP databases from their inception until July 2024. Two researchers independently reviewed the literature. The quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the GRADE profiler software was utilized to evaluate the strength of the evidence. A qualitative synthesis was performed to describe the findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 26 studies involving a total of 1381 participants, with 787 in the experimental group and 594 in the control group. These studies were mainly conducted in China, the United States, and the United Kingdom, and were published mostly after 2018. The participants had typically been dependent on drugs for more than 5 years. The review found that exercise interventions were feasible and well-accepted, and effectively reduced drug cravings. Among the 26 studies, 22 showed positive outcomes in reducing cravings. The type of exercise appears to be a crucial factor. Aerobic exercises were more effective than resistance exercises. Out of 18 studies that included aerobic exercises, 17 reported significant reductions in cravings. In contrast, among the 4 studies that included resistance exercises, 3 did not find a significant impact on cravings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Exercise is highly feasible and acceptable, significantly contributing to the reduction of drug cravings among individuals with drug dependency. The specific type of exercise appears to be a key determinant of the intervention's effectiveness. Aerobic exercises were more effective than resistance exercises. The evidence supporting these findings is of high quality, with an average score of 6.92 on the PEDro scale.</p></div><div><h3>Others</h3><p>The research was supported by the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Human Performance, with the project number 11DZ2261100. Registration details can be found on PROSPEO under the number CRD42024525700 at <span><span>www.crd.york.ac.uk</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030646032400176X/pdfft?md5=0d0b14d2cc54bcc1021f46e907b1138f&pid=1-s2.0-S030646032400176X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141914785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining the influence of cigar and cannabis co-marketing on packaging perceptions: An experiment with a sample of US youth 研究雪茄和大麻联合营销对包装认知的影响:以美国青少年为样本的实验。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108126

Significance

Cigars are sometimes marketed with cannabis references because they are often used for smoking blunts (i.e., cannabis rolled in cigar paper with or without tobacco). However, little research exists on the impact of cannabis co-marketing on cigar perceptions.

Methods

Participants included 506 US youth (ages 15–20) recruited April-June 2023 through Qualtrics who reported ever using little cigars or cigarillos (LCCs), past 30-day use of LCCs, or susceptibility to using LCCs. We then conducted a between-subjects experiment, randomizing youth to view one of two cigarillo packages: 1) a package with cannabis co-marketing (i.e., the package included a cannabis-related flavor descriptor and the word “blunt” appeared in the brand name and product label) or 2) a package with no cannabis co-marketing. We assessed the effects of the packaging on perceptions of product ingredients, addictiveness and harm perceptions, product appeal, susceptibility to using the product shown, and purchase intentions.

Results

Packages with cannabis co-marketing were perceived as more likely to contain cannabis (OR: 5.56, 95 % CI: 3.73, 8.27) and less likely to contain tobacco (OR: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.25, 0.70) or nicotine (OR: 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.40, 0.82). Cannabis co-marketing also led to higher susceptibility to using the product shown (B: 0.21, p = 0.02). We did not find evidence that cannabis co-marketing changed harm perceptions or purchase intentions.

Conclusions

Among a sample of US youth, cannabis co-marketing on cigar packages may change perceptions of product ingredients and increase susceptibility to using such products, which could lead to the initiation of cigars and cannabis.

意义:雪茄有时在销售时会提及大麻,因为雪茄通常用于吸食钝烟头(即用雪茄纸卷着大麻,或不卷烟草)。然而,关于大麻联合营销对雪茄认知的影响的研究却很少:参与者包括 2023 年 4 月至 6 月通过 Qualtrics 招募的 506 名美国青少年(15-20 岁),他们表示曾经使用过小雪茄或雪茄烟(LCC),在过去 30 天内使用过 LCC,或容易使用 LCC。然后,我们进行了一次主体间实验,随机让青少年观看两种雪茄烟包装中的一种:1)有大麻联合营销的包装(即包装上有大麻相关的味道描述,品牌名称和产品标签上有 "钝 "字);或 2)没有大麻联合营销的包装。我们评估了包装对产品成分认知、成瘾性和危害认知、产品吸引力、使用所示产品的可能性以及购买意向的影响:大麻联合营销的包装被认为更有可能含有大麻(OR:5.56,95 % CI:3.73,8.27),而含有烟草(OR:0.42,95 % CI:0.25,0.70)或尼古丁(OR:0.57,95 % CI:0.40,0.82)的可能性较低。大麻联合营销也导致更容易使用所示产品(B:0.21,P = 0.02)。我们没有发现证据表明大麻联合营销改变了危害认知或购买意向:结论:在美国青少年样本中,雪茄包装上的大麻联合营销可能会改变对产品成分的认知,增加使用此类产品的易感性,从而导致开始吸食雪茄和大麻。
{"title":"Examining the influence of cigar and cannabis co-marketing on packaging perceptions: An experiment with a sample of US youth","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108126","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108126","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Cigars are sometimes marketed with cannabis references because they are often used for smoking blunts (i.e., cannabis rolled in cigar paper with or without tobacco). However, little research exists on the impact of cannabis co-marketing on cigar perceptions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants included 506 US youth (ages 15–20) recruited April-June 2023 through Qualtrics who reported ever using little cigars or cigarillos (LCCs), past 30-day use of LCCs, or susceptibility to using LCCs. We then conducted a between-subjects experiment, randomizing youth to view one of two cigarillo packages: 1) a package with cannabis co-marketing (i.e., the package included a cannabis-related flavor descriptor and the word “blunt” appeared in the brand name and product label) or 2) a package with no cannabis co-marketing. We assessed the effects of the packaging on perceptions of product ingredients, addictiveness and harm perceptions, product appeal, susceptibility to using the product shown, and purchase intentions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Packages with cannabis co-marketing were perceived as more likely to contain cannabis (<em>OR</em>: 5.56, 95 % CI: 3.73, 8.27) and less likely to contain tobacco (<em>OR</em>: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.25, 0.70) or nicotine (<em>OR</em>: 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.40, 0.82). Cannabis co-marketing also led to higher susceptibility to using the product shown (<em>B</em>: 0.21, <em>p</em> = 0.02). We did not find evidence that cannabis co-marketing changed harm perceptions or purchase intentions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among a sample of US youth, cannabis co-marketing on cigar packages may change perceptions of product ingredients and increase susceptibility to using such products, which could lead to the initiation of cigars and cannabis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141914786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A cue reactivity experiment: Exposure to images of alcoholic beverages and social contexts on alcohol cravings, motivations, attitudes, approval, and behavior 提示反应实验:暴露于酒精饮料的图像和社会环境对酒精的渴望、动机、态度、认可和行为的影响。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108125

The incentive-sensitization theory of addiction postulates that relevant cues can trigger alcohol cravings, tendencies, and related outcomes. Additionally, consistent with the encoding specificity principle and social impact theory, social contexts depicting people can activate pro-alcohol reactions and tendencies. This randomized experiment tested the cue reactivity effects of exposure to images depicting variations in the number of people consuming alcoholic or nonalcoholic beverages on alcohol-related cravings and outcomes. The sample consisted of 594 adult alcohol users who passed manipulation checks. Participants were randomly assigned to a condition in a 2 (beverage type cue manipulation: alcoholic vs. nonalcoholic) × 3 (social context cue manipulation: beverage-only [no people] vs. solitary drinking [1 person] vs. social drinking [2 or more people]) factorial design and primed with a series of photographs. Dependent variables measured alcohol cravings, alcohol motives, alcohol attitudes, alcohol approval, and alcohol behavior. Factorial MANCOVA and ANCOVAs were performed. Main effects for the social context manipulation were found. Specifically, the social drinking condition compared to the beverage-only condition induced significantly higher pro-alcohol cravings, attitudes, and behaviors. The beverage type manipulation did not influence the dependent variables. The findings offer insights that visual cues depicting social drinking scenarios activated alcohol-related cravings and outcomes, regardless of whether the beverages shown were alcoholic or nonalcoholic. This priming experiment helps to understand the social mechanisms underlying cue reactivity and offers implications for advancing cue-based alcohol interventions.

成瘾的激励-敏感化理论认为,相关线索会引发对酒精的渴望、倾向和相关结果。此外,与编码特异性原理和社会影响理论一致,描绘人物的社会环境可以激活亲酒精反应和倾向。这项随机实验测试了暴露于描绘饮用含酒精或不含酒精饮料的人数变化的图像对酒精相关渴求和结果的提示反应效应。样本由 594 名通过操作检查的成年酒精使用者组成。受试者被随机分配到 2(饮料类型线索操作:含酒精与不含酒精)×3(社会环境线索操作:纯饮料[无人]与独自饮酒[1 人]与社交饮酒[2 人或更多])因子设计的条件中,并以一系列照片作为诱导。因变量测量酒精渴望、酒精动机、酒精态度、酒精认可和酒精行为。进行了因子 MANCOVA 和方差分析。结果发现,社会环境操作具有主效应。具体来说,社交饮酒条件与纯饮料条件相比,会诱发明显更高的亲酒渴望、态度和行为。饮料类型操纵对因变量没有影响。研究结果表明,无论显示的饮料是含酒精的还是不含酒精的,描述社交饮酒场景的视觉线索都会激活与酒精相关的渴望和结果。这一引物实验有助于了解线索反应的社会机制,并为推进基于线索的酒精干预措施提供了启示。
{"title":"A cue reactivity experiment: Exposure to images of alcoholic beverages and social contexts on alcohol cravings, motivations, attitudes, approval, and behavior","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108125","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108125","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The incentive-sensitization theory of addiction postulates that relevant cues can trigger alcohol cravings, tendencies, and related outcomes. Additionally, consistent with the encoding specificity principle and social impact theory, social contexts depicting people can activate pro-alcohol reactions and tendencies. This randomized experiment tested the cue reactivity effects of exposure to images depicting variations in the number of people consuming alcoholic or nonalcoholic beverages on alcohol-related cravings and outcomes. The sample consisted of 594 adult alcohol users who passed manipulation checks. Participants were randomly assigned to a condition in a 2 (beverage type cue manipulation: alcoholic vs. nonalcoholic) × 3 (social context cue manipulation: beverage-only [no people] vs. solitary drinking [1 person] vs. social drinking [2 or more people]) factorial design and primed with a series of photographs. Dependent variables measured alcohol cravings, alcohol motives, alcohol attitudes, alcohol approval, and alcohol behavior. Factorial MANCOVA and ANCOVAs were performed. Main effects for the social context manipulation were found. Specifically, the social drinking condition compared to the beverage-only condition induced significantly higher pro-alcohol cravings, attitudes, and behaviors. The beverage type manipulation did not influence the dependent variables. The findings offer insights that visual cues depicting social drinking scenarios activated alcohol-related cravings and outcomes, regardless of whether the beverages shown were alcoholic or nonalcoholic. This priming experiment helps to understand the social mechanisms underlying cue reactivity and offers implications for advancing cue-based alcohol interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141914784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Youth use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Wave 6: Impact of survey mode 烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)第 6 波调查中青少年使用电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)的情况:调查模式的影响。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108124

Background

The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) provides annual prevalence data on youth use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). However, trends may be complicated by COVID-related changes in survey mode (self-completed vs. telephone interview) across 2019–2021.

Methods

Trends in past 30-day (P30D) ENDS use over PATH waves 5 (2019; 100 % self-completed), 5.5 (2020; 100 % telephone interview), and 6 (2021; 33.5 % self-completed, 66.5 % telephone interview) were examined among continuing youth, overall and within survey mode. Further analyses examined the nature of these changes by examining 1) potential response biases in social contexts of nicotine use, and 2) sources of ENDS over time.

Results

Telephone interviewees were less likely to report ENDS use (4.6 % vs. 8.6 % for self-completers), and more likely to report social disapproval of nicotine use, suggesting a reporting bias in telephone interviews. Survey-mode-naïve analyses suggested a large decline in P30D ENDS use prevalence between 2019–20 (10.2–4.6 %) followed by an apparent uptick in 2021 (5.9 %); however, comparing like-to-like survey modes showed a more modest decline (10.2 % in 2019; 8.6 % in 2021; self-completed) with no change between 2020 and 2021 (4.6 % in both; telephone interviews). Analyses suggested that the mode effects were partly, but not wholly, related to social desirability effects.

Discussion

Changes in PATH survey mode introduced artifacts into ENDS use prevalence, possibly due in part to social desirability bias suppressing reporting in telephone interviews, rather than a true uptick. It is essential to account for survey mode in PATH surveys.

背景:烟草与健康人群评估(PATH)提供了青少年使用电子尼古丁递送系统(ENDS)的年度流行率数据。然而,在 2019-2021 年期间,与 COVID 相关的调查模式(自我填写与电话访谈)的变化可能会使趋势变得复杂:方法:研究了 PATH 第 5 波(2019 年;100% 自填)、5.5 波(2020 年;100% 电话访问)和 6 波(2021 年;33.5% 自填,66.5% 电话访问)期间持续吸烟青少年的过去 30 天(P30D)ENDS 使用趋势,包括总体趋势和调查模式内的趋势。进一步的分析通过研究 1)尼古丁使用的社会背景中可能存在的回答偏差,以及 2)随着时间推移 ENDS 的来源,研究了这些变化的性质:电话受访者报告使用 ENDS 的可能性较低(4.6%,而自我填写者为 8.6%),而且更有可能报告社会不认可尼古丁的使用,这表明电话采访中存在报告偏差。对调查模式的分析表明,P30D ENDS 使用流行率在 2019-20 年间出现大幅下降(10.2-4.6%),随后在 2021 年出现明显上升(5.9%);然而,对类似调查模式进行比较后发现,下降幅度较小(2019 年为 10.2%;2021 年为 8.6%;自填式),2020 年至 2021 年间没有变化(均为 4.6%;电话访问)。分析表明,调查模式的影响部分与社会期望效应有关,但并非完全如此:PATH调查模式的变化为ENDS使用流行率带来了假象,部分原因可能是社会期望偏差抑制了电话访谈中的报告,而非真正的上升。在 PATH 调查中考虑调查模式至关重要。
{"title":"Youth use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Wave 6: Impact of survey mode","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108124","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108124","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) provides annual prevalence data on youth use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). However, trends may be complicated by COVID-related changes in survey mode (self-completed vs. telephone interview) across 2019–2021.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Trends in past 30-day (P30D) ENDS use over PATH waves 5 (2019; 100 % self-completed), 5.5 (2020; 100 % telephone interview), and 6 (2021; 33.5 % self-completed, 66.5 % telephone interview) were examined among continuing youth, overall and within survey mode. Further analyses examined the nature of these changes by examining 1) potential response biases in social contexts of nicotine use, and 2) sources of ENDS over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Telephone interviewees were less likely to report ENDS use (4.6 % vs. 8.6 % for self-completers), and more likely to report social disapproval of nicotine use, suggesting a reporting bias in telephone interviews. Survey-mode-naïve analyses suggested a large decline in P30D ENDS use prevalence between 2019–20 (10.2–4.6 %) followed by an apparent uptick in 2021 (5.9 %); however, comparing like-to-like survey modes showed a more modest decline (10.2 % in 2019; 8.6 % in 2021; self-completed) with no change between 2020 and 2021 (4.6 % in both; telephone interviews). Analyses suggested that the mode effects were partly, but not wholly, related to social desirability effects.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Changes in PATH survey mode introduced artifacts into ENDS use prevalence, possibly due in part to social desirability bias suppressing reporting in telephone interviews, rather than a true uptick. It is essential to account for survey mode in PATH surveys.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141895059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differentiating the associations of passive and active social media use with e-cigarette use among U.S. youth 区分被动和主动使用社交媒体与美国青少年使用电子烟的关系
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108121

Purpose

The impacts of passive (i.e., browsing) versus active (i.e., engagement) use of social media on e-cigarette use among youth have been understudied in existing literature. This study examines how passive and active use of social media are differentially associated with e-cigarette use among youth and how risk perceptions mediate these associations.

Methods

Pooled data from the 2021 and 2022 National Youth Tobacco Survey (N=48,704, aged 11–19) were used. Weighted structural equation models were employed to estimate the associations between passive and active social media use and youth e-cigarette use.

Results

Both passive and active social media use were associated with higher odds and more days of e-cigarette use among youth. E-cigarette risk perceptions mediated the associations between active use and both the likelihood of ever using e-cigarettes and the number of days of use. Risk perceptions mediated the association between active, but not passive, use and the number of days of e-cigarette use. Compared to passive use, active use was overall associated with higher odds and more days of youth e-cigarette use.

Discussion

The findings suggest that public health efforts should distinguish between passive and active social media use when designing and executing interventions. Attention and efforts should also be directed towards understanding the distinct indirect effects of passive and active social media use through risk perceptions. These findings advance our theoretical understanding of the role of different types of social media use and offer significant practical insights for interventions.

现有文献对被动(即浏览)和主动(即参与)使用社交媒体对青少年使用电子烟的影响研究不足。本研究探讨了社交媒体的被动使用和主动使用与青少年使用电子烟之间的不同关联,以及风险认知如何调节这些关联。研究使用了 2021 年和 2022 年全国青少年烟草调查的汇总数据(N=48,704,11-19 岁)。采用加权结构方程模型来估计被动和主动使用社交媒体与青少年使用电子烟之间的关联。被动和主动使用社交媒体都与青少年使用电子烟的几率更高、天数更多有关。电子烟风险认知在主动使用与曾经使用电子烟的可能性和使用天数之间起到了中介作用。在主动使用(而非被动使用)与电子烟使用天数之间,风险认知起到了中介作用。与被动使用相比,主动使用总体上与青少年使用电子烟的几率更高、天数更多有关。研究结果表明,在设计和执行干预措施时,公共卫生工作应区分社交媒体的被动使用和主动使用。此外,还应关注和努力了解被动和主动使用社交媒体通过风险认知产生的不同间接影响。这些发现推进了我们对不同类型社交媒体使用作用的理论理解,并为干预措施提供了重要的实践启示。
{"title":"Differentiating the associations of passive and active social media use with e-cigarette use among U.S. youth","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108121","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108121","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The impacts of passive (i.e., browsing) versus active (i.e., engagement) use of social media on e-cigarette use among youth have been understudied in existing literature. This study examines how passive and active use of social media are differentially associated with e-cigarette use among youth and how risk perceptions mediate these associations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pooled data from the 2021 and 2022 National Youth Tobacco Survey (N=48,704, aged 11–19) were used. Weighted structural equation models were employed to estimate the associations between passive and active social media use and youth e-cigarette use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both passive and active social media use were associated with higher odds and more days of e-cigarette use among youth. E-cigarette risk perceptions mediated the associations between active use and both the likelihood of ever using e-cigarettes and the number of days of use. Risk perceptions mediated the association between active, but not passive, use and the number of days of e-cigarette use. Compared to passive use, active use was overall associated with higher odds and more days of youth e-cigarette use.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The findings suggest that public health efforts should distinguish between passive and active social media use when designing and executing interventions. Attention and efforts should also be directed towards understanding the distinct indirect effects of passive and active social media use through risk perceptions. These findings advance our theoretical understanding of the role of different types of social media use and offer significant practical insights for interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141880630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Day-level correlates of nicotine and cannabis vaping among young adults in the United States 美国年轻成年人吸食尼古丁和大麻的日水平相关性
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108119

Over the past two decades, vaping has increased in popularity among young adults. Yet, little is known about the daily activities or contexts associated with vaping behavior. The current study examined whether nicotine vaping, cannabis vaping, and dual-substance vaping (i.e., vaping both nicotine and cannabis) fluctuated in tandem with alcohol use and activities on a given day. Data came from the Monitoring the Future Vaping Supplement, a national sample of U.S. young adults. A subsample of people who vaped (N = 330 people) completed up to 14 daily surveys (N = 3686 days). Multilevel logistic regressions separated within- and between-person characteristics and controlled for combustible nicotine and cannabis use, day of the week, and demographic characteristics. Weights accounted for the complex survey design and attrition. Results demonstrated that nicotine vaping was more common on days when participants drank moderately or binge drank (compared to not drinking), used cigarettes, and spent more time at bars and parties than usual. Cannabis vaping on a given day was more likely on days when young adults drank moderately and spent more time at bars/parties. Likewise, moderate drinking, spending more time at bars/parties than usual, and spending less time on schoolwork than usual was associated with a higher likelihood of dual-substance vaping on a given day. Our findings highlight when young adults vape nicotine and cannabis, while also identifying proximal correlates of these behaviors to inform intervention and cessation efforts.

过去二十年来,吸食电子烟在年轻人中越来越流行。然而,人们对与吸食行为相关的日常活动或环境知之甚少。目前的研究考察了尼古丁吸食、大麻吸食和双重物质吸食(即既吸食尼古丁又吸食大麻)是否与特定日子的酒精使用和活动同步波动。数据来自 "监测未来吸食补充资料"(Monitoring the Future Vaping Supplement),这是一项针对美国年轻成年人的全国性抽样调查。吸食者的子样本(= 330 人)完成了多达 14 次日常调查(= 3686 天)。多层次逻辑回归分离了人内和人际特征,并控制了可燃尼古丁和大麻的使用、星期几以及人口特征。权重考虑了复杂的调查设计和自然减员。结果表明,尼古丁吸食在参与者中度饮酒或酗酒(与不饮酒相比)、使用香烟以及在酒吧和派对上花费比平时更多时间的日子里更为常见。在年轻人适度饮酒和在酒吧/派对上花费更多时间的日子里,吸食大麻的可能性更大。同样,适度饮酒、在酒吧/派对上花费的时间比平时多、在学校功课上花费的时间比平时少,也与某一天吸食双重物质的可能性较高有关。我们的研究结果凸显了年轻成年人吸食尼古丁和大麻的情况,同时也确定了这些行为的近端相关因素,以便为干预和戒烟工作提供信息。
{"title":"Day-level correlates of nicotine and cannabis vaping among young adults in the United States","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108119","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108119","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past two decades, vaping has increased in popularity among young adults. Yet, little is known about the daily activities or contexts associated with vaping behavior. The current study examined whether nicotine vaping, cannabis vaping, and dual-substance vaping (i.e., vaping both nicotine and cannabis) fluctuated in tandem with alcohol use and activities on a given day. Data came from the Monitoring the Future Vaping Supplement, a national sample of U.S. young adults. A subsample of people who vaped (<em>N</em> = 330 people) completed up to 14 daily surveys (<em>N</em> = 3686 days). Multilevel logistic regressions separated within- and between-person characteristics and controlled for combustible nicotine and cannabis use, day of the week, and demographic characteristics. Weights accounted for the complex survey design and attrition. Results demonstrated that nicotine vaping was more common on days when participants drank moderately or binge drank (compared to not drinking), used cigarettes, and spent more time at bars and parties than usual. Cannabis vaping on a given day was more likely on days when young adults drank moderately and spent more time at bars/parties. Likewise, moderate drinking, spending more time at bars/parties than usual, and spending less time on schoolwork than usual was associated with a higher likelihood of dual-substance vaping on a given day. Our findings highlight <em>when</em> young adults vape nicotine and cannabis, while also identifying proximal correlates of these behaviors to inform intervention and cessation efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141770346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender-specific motivational pathways in ADHD-related inattention and gaming disorder symptoms 与多动症相关的注意力不集中和游戏障碍症状的性别特异性动机途径
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108120

Comorbidity between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and gaming disorder (GD) is widely recognized in the literature. Previous research has indicated gender-dependent underlying mechanisms in the development and maintenance of problematic gaming. Motivational research presents an opportunity to provide further insight regarding the nature of this association. Self-report data were collected from videogame players (N = 14,740) using an online survey in collaboration with a popular gaming magazine. The survey included items concerning symptoms of ADHD and GD, motives for gaming, and time spent playing videogames. Structural equation modeling was used to create two parallel mediation models (one for males, one for females), including motives to play games as mediators. This was done to potentially explain psychological drivers of the association between ADHD and GD. Results demonstrated a common pathway from inattention to GD symptom severity through the immersion/escapism motivation for both males (β = 0.068; p < 0.001) and females (β = 0.081; p < 0.05), while the paths from inattention to GD symptom severity through the habit/boredom motive (β = 0.094; p < 0.001) and competition motive (β = 0.021; p < 0.001) were only significant for males. Gamers experiencing symptoms of ADHD, especially inattentive symptoms, are at risk of the occurrence of GD symptoms through videogames becoming a source of maladaptive coping with daily psychological disturbances. Males experiencing inattentive symptoms tend to additionally develop problematic patterns of use through videogame playing, becoming a subjectively meaningless and boredom-reduction-oriented habitual activity or a platform of virtual competition. Unique differences suggest the necessity of different treatment approaches for males and females.

注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)与游戏障碍(GD)之间的共病在文献中得到广泛认可。以往的研究表明,问题游戏的发展和维持与性别有关。动机研究为进一步了解这种关联的性质提供了机会。我们与一家流行游戏杂志合作,通过在线调查收集了电子游戏玩家(人数=14,740)的自我报告数据。调查项目包括多动症和广东话症状、游戏动机和玩电子游戏的时间。我们使用结构方程模型建立了两个平行的中介模型(一个针对男性,一个针对女性),其中包括作为中介的游戏动机。这样做可能是为了解释多动症与广东话之间关联的心理驱动因素。结果显示,男性(β = 0.068; p < 0.001)和女性(β = 0.081; p < 0.05),而通过习惯/厌烦动机(β = 0.094; p <0.001)和竞争动机(β = 0.021; p <0.001)从注意力不集中到广东症状严重程度的路径仅对男性显著。出现多动症症状(尤其是注意力不集中症状)的游戏玩家有可能因电子游戏成为应对日常心理困扰的不适应来源而出现多动症症状。出现注意力不集中症状的男性往往还会通过玩电子游戏形成有问题的使用模式,成为一种主观上无意义的、以减少无聊为导向的习惯性活动或虚拟竞争平台。这种独特的差异表明,有必要对男性和女性采取不同的治疗方法。
{"title":"Gender-specific motivational pathways in ADHD-related inattention and gaming disorder symptoms","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108120","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108120","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Comorbidity between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and gaming disorder (GD) is widely recognized in the literature. Previous research has indicated gender-dependent underlying mechanisms in the development and maintenance of problematic gaming. Motivational research presents an opportunity to provide further insight regarding the nature of this association. Self-report data were collected from videogame players (N = 14,740) using an online survey in collaboration with a popular gaming magazine. The survey included items concerning symptoms of ADHD and GD, motives for gaming, and time spent playing videogames. Structural equation modeling was used to create two parallel mediation models (one for males, one for females), including motives to play games as mediators. This was done to potentially explain psychological drivers of the association between ADHD and GD. Results demonstrated a common pathway from inattention to GD symptom severity through the immersion/escapism motivation for both males (β = 0.068; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and females (β = 0.081; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), while the paths from inattention to GD symptom severity through the habit/boredom motive (β = 0.094; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and competition motive (β = 0.021; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were only significant for males. Gamers experiencing symptoms of ADHD, especially inattentive symptoms, are at risk of the occurrence of GD symptoms through videogames becoming a source of maladaptive coping with daily psychological disturbances. Males experiencing inattentive symptoms tend to additionally develop problematic patterns of use through videogame playing, becoming a subjectively meaningless and boredom-reduction-oriented habitual activity or a platform of virtual competition. Unique differences suggest the necessity of different treatment approaches for males and females.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141852143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Urgent need for treatment addressing co-use of tobacco and cannabis: An updated review and considerations for future interventions 迫切需要针对烟草和大麻共同使用的治疗:最新审查和对未来干预措施的考虑
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108118

Background

There are no clinical practice guidelines addressing the treatment of tobacco-cannabis co-use and a dearth of studies to inform treatment for co-use. This narrative review aims to (1) summarize promising intervention components used in published co-use treatment studies, (2) describe key gaps and emerging issues in co-use, and (3) provide recommendations and considerations in the development and evaluation of co-use interventions.

Methods

We conducted a literature search in June 2024 across several databases to update previous reviews on tobacco-cannabis co-use treatment. We found 9 published intervention studies that specifically addressed treatment for both substances. Data from these studies were manually extracted and summarized.

Results

Most of the 9 included studies (1) focused on acceptability and/or feasibility, (2) provided both psychosocial/behavioral and pharmacotherapy intervention components, (3) were conducted in adults, and (4) were delivered in-person, with some having digital asynchronous components, for a 5-to-12-week duration. The most common psychosocial/behavioral strategies used were Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Motivational Interviewing, and Contingency Management; while the most common pharmacotherapy was Nicotine Replacement Therapy. There was no evidence of compensatory use of tobacco or cannabis when providing simultaneous treatment for both substances.

Conclusions

The literature to date provides support for well-integrated multi-component interventions of psychosocial/behavioral and pharmacotherapy strategies for co-use treatment. This review reinforces an urgent need for treatments targeting tobacco and cannabis co-use. Future interventions should address key gaps, including co-use of vaporized products among youth and young adults, tailored interventions for priority populations, and digital applications to increase reach and advance health equity.

目前还没有针对烟草大麻共用治疗的临床实践指南,也缺乏为烟草大麻共用治疗提供依据的研究。本叙述性综述旨在:(1)总结已发表的烟草大麻共用治疗研究中使用的有前景的干预成分;(2)描述烟草大麻共用方面的主要差距和新出现的问题;(3)提供开发和评估烟草大麻共用干预措施的建议和注意事项。我们于 2024 年 6 月在多个数据库中进行了文献检索,以更新之前关于烟草大麻共用治疗的综述。我们发现有 9 项已发表的干预研究专门针对这两种物质的治疗。我们人工提取并总结了这些研究的数据。在纳入的 9 项研究中,大多数研究(1)侧重于可接受性和/或可行性;(2)同时提供心理社会/行为干预和药物治疗干预内容;(3)以成人为研究对象;(4)以面对面的方式进行,其中一些包含数字异步内容,持续时间为 5-12 周。最常用的社会心理/行为策略是认知行为疗法、动机访谈法和权宜管理法;而最常用的药物疗法是尼古丁替代疗法。在同时对两种药物进行治疗时,没有证据表明会出现烟草或大麻的代偿性使用。迄今为止的文献支持对同时使用两种药物的治疗采取社会心理/行为和药物治疗策略相结合的多成分干预措施。本综述强调了针对烟草和大麻共同使用的治疗方法的迫切需要。未来的干预措施应解决关键差距,包括青少年和年轻成年人共同使用汽化产品、针对重点人群的定制干预措施,以及增加覆盖面和促进健康公平的数字应用。
{"title":"Urgent need for treatment addressing co-use of tobacco and cannabis: An updated review and considerations for future interventions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108118","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108118","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are no clinical practice guidelines addressing the treatment of tobacco-cannabis co-use and a dearth of studies to inform treatment for co-use. This narrative review aims to (1) summarize promising intervention components used in published co-use treatment studies, (2) describe key gaps and emerging issues in co-use, and (3) provide recommendations and considerations in the development and evaluation of co-use interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a literature search in June 2024 across several databases to update previous reviews on tobacco-cannabis co-use treatment. We found 9 published intervention studies that specifically addressed treatment for both substances. Data from these studies were manually extracted and summarized.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most of the 9 included studies (1) focused on acceptability and/or feasibility, (2) provided both psychosocial/behavioral and pharmacotherapy intervention components, (3) were conducted in adults, and (4) were delivered in-person, with some having digital asynchronous components, for a 5-to-12-week duration. The most common psychosocial/behavioral strategies used were Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Motivational Interviewing, and Contingency Management; while the most common pharmacotherapy was Nicotine Replacement Therapy. There was no evidence of compensatory use of tobacco or cannabis when providing simultaneous treatment for both substances.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The literature to date provides support for well-integrated multi-component interventions of psychosocial/behavioral and pharmacotherapy strategies for co-use treatment. This review reinforces an urgent need for treatments targeting tobacco and cannabis co-use. Future interventions should address key gaps, including co-use of vaporized products among youth and young adults, tailored interventions for priority populations, and digital applications to increase reach and advance health equity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141770347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Addictive behaviors
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1