Actas dermo-sifiliograficas最新文献

Background: Despite advances made in treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD), information on its impact and interaction with atopic comorbidities, such as asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and ocular disease is limited. This study aims to assess the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of patients with AD-treatment response included-while taking into consideration atopic comorbidities like these.

Materials and methods: Data were analyzed from the multicenter BIOBADATOP registry (a prospective cohort of AD patients initiating systemic treatment). We conducted a descriptive analysis of the main characteristics collected in the registry in relation to atopic comorbidity.

Results: We included a total of 509 patients, mostly adults (81.9%) with severe AD (73.7%). Patients with personal atopic comorbidity (64%) more frequently exhibited flexural dermatitis (89.7% vs 81.5%), a higher mean of previous systemic treatments (1.6 vs 1.3), and higher baseline values on the POEM scale (19.6 vs 17.9). Patients with familial atopic comorbidity (40.7%) had a higher incidence of pediatric/adolescent patients (24.2% vs 13.9%) and a history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (61.1% vs 47.1%). No differences regarding treatment response were observed at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups based on the presence or absence of atopic comorbidities.

Conclusions: Results suggest that a history of atopic comorbidity is associated with an early onset and persistent course of AD. Although no differences were reported in the short-term treatment response, further follow-up is required to better understand the impact of comorbidities on AD.

Background and aims: Previous results of the Dermatology-Life-Quality-Index (DLQI) validation in Colombia based on the classical test theory (CTT) perspective have showed the need to delve into its measurement properties. Therefore, we aimed to assess the structural validity, internal consistency and item response analysis of the DLQI through the item response theory (IRT) or the Rasch model.

Material and methods: We assessed the dimensionality of the DLQI, determined its difficulty, discrimination and differential functioning and went on to evaluate its internal consistency and discriminative validity among patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory skin disease. We recruited Colombian patients with different skin diseases.

Results: Data of 865 patients (mean age, 49.3 years; 61% females) were included. DLQI-scores ranged from 0 up to 30. Internal consistency for dichotomous item #7 showed a McDonald's Omega coefficient of 0.85 (95%CI, 0.84-0.87) and a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.84-0.88). For ordinal item #7, the McDonald's Omega coefficient was 0.87 (95%IC:0.85-0.89) and Cronbach's α coefficient, 0.84 (95%CI, 0.82-0.87). Horn's parallel analysis revealed the presence of DLQI unidimensionality with a 1-factor solution. Only item #1 fitted the PCM model. The remaining items, including item #9, did not show adequate fit due to overlapping responses and order changes.

Conclusions: The validity of DLQI-COL based on Rasch analysis proved not to be a suitable instrument to evaluate QoL in our dermatologic population. A refined version of the scale with an adequate cross-cultural adaptation and validation process is needed to obtain an appropriate and reliable version of the instrument for QOL measuring in Colombian patients with skin diseases.

Although comedones are a prevalent entity in multiple skin diseases, their perianal location as a cluster is a rare finding. We describe 5 patients with grouped perianal comedones who developed the lesions in adulthood and were treatment-naïve in the perianal area. Four of them had had inflammatory lesions in armpits and groins. In 2, the anatomopathological examination revealed the presence of follicular infundibulum dilatation, cystification, and fibrotic and inflammatory changes in the underlying dermis-findings consistent with hidradenitis suppurativa-which is why we wonder whether grouped perianal comedones are a mild form of hidradenitis suppurativa or an isolated entity.

The objective of our study was to analyze the effectiveness of oral minoxidil on the frontotemporal hairline in patients with FFA. We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, multicenter study in 2 Brazilian and 1 Spanish centers. Responses were graded on a scale of 3 positive points. A total of 122 patients were included. Subjective improvement in the density of the frontotemporal hairline was observed in 45.1% patients, which was categorized as mild (34.4%), moderate (9.0%), and excellent (1.6%). Hair density improved in 57.4% of the patients' interparietal. Additionally, 25.4% and 3.3% of the patients experienced eyebrow and eyelash growth, respectively. Adverse effects were detected in 33.6% patients, with hypertrichosis being the most common (23.8%). In this study, oral minoxidil proved to be an additional therapy for FFA that not only improved the patients' overall hair and eyebrow growth, but also the density of the frontotemporal hairline.