Frontiers in bioinformatics最新文献

Electron microscopy (EM) enables imaging at a resolution of nanometers and can shed light on how cancer evolves to develop resistance to therapy. Acquiring these images has become a routine task.However, analyzing them is now a bottleneck, as manual structure identification is very time-consuming and can take up to several months for a single sample. Deep learning approaches offer a suitable solution to speed up the analysis. In this work, we present a study of several state-of-the-art deep learning models for the task of segmenting nuclei and nucleoli in volumes from tumor biopsies. We compared previous results obtained with the ResUNet architecture to the more recent UNet++, FracTALResNet, SenFormer, and CEECNet models. In addition, we explored the utilization of unlabeled images through semi-supervised learning with Cross Pseudo Supervision. We have trained and evaluated all of the models on sparse manual labels from three fully annotated in-house datasets that we have made available on demand, demonstrating improvements in terms of 3D Dice score. From the analysis of these results, we drew conclusions on the relative gains of using more complex models, and semi-supervised learning as well as the next steps for the mitigation of the manual segmentation bottleneck.

Ancient DNA is highly degraded, resulting in very short sequences. Reads generated with modern high-throughput sequencing machines are generally longer than ancient DNA molecules, therefore the reads often contain some portion of the sequencing adaptors. It is crucial to remove those adaptors, as they can interfere with downstream analysis. Furthermore, overlapping portions when DNA has been read forward and backward (paired-end) can be merged to correct sequencing errors and improve read quality. Several tools have been developed for adapter trimming and read merging, however, no one has attempted to evaluate their accuracy and evaluate their potential impact on downstream analyses. Through the simulation of sequencing data, seven commonly used tools were analyzed in their ability to reconstruct ancient DNA sequences through read merging. The analyzed tools exhibit notable differences in their abilities to correct sequence errors and identify the correct read overlap, but the most substantial difference is observed in their ability to calculate quality scores for merged bases. Selecting the most appropriate tool for a given project depends on several factors, although some tools such as fastp have some shortcomings, whereas others like leeHom outperform the other tools in most aspects. While the choice of tool did not result in a measurable difference when analyzing population genetics using principal component analysis, it is important to note that downstream analyses that are sensitive to wrongly merged reads or that rely on quality scores can be significantly impacted by the choice of tool.

Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) provides valuable quantitative insights into fluorophores' chemical microenvironment. Due to long computation times and the lack of accessible, open-source real-time analysis toolkits, traditional analysis of FLIM data, particularly with the widely used time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) approach, typically occurs after acquisition. As a result, uncertainties about the quality of FLIM data persist even after collection, frequently necessitating the extension of imaging sessions. Unfortunately, prolonged sessions not only risk missing important biological events but also cause photobleaching and photodamage. We present the first open-source program designed for real-time FLIM analysis during specimen scanning to address these challenges. Our approach combines acquisition with real-time computational and visualization capabilities, allowing us to assess FLIM data quality on the fly. Our open-source real-time FLIM viewer, integrated as a Napari plugin, displays phasor analysis and rapid lifetime determination (RLD) results computed from real-time data transmitted by acquisition software such as the open-source Micro-Manager-based OpenScan package. Our method facilitates early identification of FLIM signatures and data quality assessment by providing preliminary analysis during acquisition. This not only speeds up the imaging process, but it is especially useful when imaging sensitive live biological samples.

Many proteins display a non-random distribution on the cell surface. From dimers to nanoscale clusters to large, micron-scale aggregations, these distributions regulate protein-protein interactions and signalling. Although these distributions show organisation on length-scales below the resolution limit of conventional optical microscopy, single molecule localisation microscopy (SMLM) can map molecule locations with nanometre precision. The data from SMLM is not a conventional pixelated image and instead takes the form of a point-pattern-a list of the x, y coordinates of the localised molecules. To extract the biological insights that researchers require cluster analysis is often performed on these data sets, quantifying such parameters as the size of clusters, the percentage of monomers and so on. Here, we provide some guidance on how SMLM clustering should best be performed.

The recent breakthroughs of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of natural language processing have opened the way to significant advances in protein research. Indeed, the relationships between human natural language and the "language of proteins" invite the application and adaptation of LLMs to protein modelling and design. Considering the impressive results of GPT-4 and other recently developed LLMs in processing, generating and translating human languages, we anticipate analogous results with the language of proteins. Indeed, protein language models have been already trained to accurately predict protein properties, generate novel functionally characterized proteins, achieving state-of-the-art results. In this paper we discuss the promises and the open challenges raised by this novel and exciting research area, and we propose our perspective on how LLMs will affect protein modeling and design.