Frontiers in bioinformatics最新文献

Understanding how a T-cell receptor (TCR) recognizes its specific ligand peptide is crucial for gaining an insight into biological functions and disease mechanisms. Despite its importance, experimentally determining TCR-peptide-major histocompatibility complex (TCR-pMHC) interactions is expensive and time-consuming. To address this challenge, computational methods have been proposed, but they are typically evaluated by internal retrospective validation only, and few researchers have incorporated and tested an attention layer from language models into structural information. Therefore, in this study, we developed a machine learning model based on a modified version of Transformer, a source-target attention neural network, to predict the TCR-pMHC interaction solely from the amino acid sequences of the TCR complementarity-determining region (CDR) 3 and the peptide. This model achieved competitive performance on a benchmark dataset of the TCR-pMHC interaction, as well as on a truly new external dataset. Additionally, by analyzing the results of binding predictions, we associated the neural network weights with protein structural properties. By classifying the residues into large- and small-attention groups, we identified statistically significant properties associated with the largely attended residues such as hydrogen bonds within CDR3. The dataset that we created and the ability of our model to provide an interpretable prediction of TCR-peptide binding should increase our knowledge about molecular recognition and pave the way for designing new therapeutics.

Electron microscopy (EM) enables imaging at a resolution of nanometers and can shed light on how cancer evolves to develop resistance to therapy. Acquiring these images has become a routine task.However, analyzing them is now a bottleneck, as manual structure identification is very time-consuming and can take up to several months for a single sample. Deep learning approaches offer a suitable solution to speed up the analysis. In this work, we present a study of several state-of-the-art deep learning models for the task of segmenting nuclei and nucleoli in volumes from tumor biopsies. We compared previous results obtained with the ResUNet architecture to the more recent UNet++, FracTALResNet, SenFormer, and CEECNet models. In addition, we explored the utilization of unlabeled images through semi-supervised learning with Cross Pseudo Supervision. We have trained and evaluated all of the models on sparse manual labels from three fully annotated in-house datasets that we have made available on demand, demonstrating improvements in terms of 3D Dice score. From the analysis of these results, we drew conclusions on the relative gains of using more complex models, and semi-supervised learning as well as the next steps for the mitigation of the manual segmentation bottleneck.

Ancient DNA is highly degraded, resulting in very short sequences. Reads generated with modern high-throughput sequencing machines are generally longer than ancient DNA molecules, therefore the reads often contain some portion of the sequencing adaptors. It is crucial to remove those adaptors, as they can interfere with downstream analysis. Furthermore, overlapping portions when DNA has been read forward and backward (paired-end) can be merged to correct sequencing errors and improve read quality. Several tools have been developed for adapter trimming and read merging, however, no one has attempted to evaluate their accuracy and evaluate their potential impact on downstream analyses. Through the simulation of sequencing data, seven commonly used tools were analyzed in their ability to reconstruct ancient DNA sequences through read merging. The analyzed tools exhibit notable differences in their abilities to correct sequence errors and identify the correct read overlap, but the most substantial difference is observed in their ability to calculate quality scores for merged bases. Selecting the most appropriate tool for a given project depends on several factors, although some tools such as fastp have some shortcomings, whereas others like leeHom outperform the other tools in most aspects. While the choice of tool did not result in a measurable difference when analyzing population genetics using principal component analysis, it is important to note that downstream analyses that are sensitive to wrongly merged reads or that rely on quality scores can be significantly impacted by the choice of tool.