首页 > 最新文献

JMIR infodemiology最新文献

英文 中文
Emotions and Incivility in Vaccine Mandate Discourse: Natural Language Processing Insights. 疫苗强制接种言论中的情绪和不礼貌行为:自然语言处理的启示。
IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-09-13 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/37635
Hannah Stevens, Muhammad Ehab Rasul, Yoo Jung Oh
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite vaccine availability, vaccine hesitancy has inhibited public health officials' efforts to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Although some US elected officials have responded by issuing vaccine mandates, others have amplified vaccine hesitancy by broadcasting messages that minimize vaccine efficacy. The politically polarized nature of COVID-19 information on social media has given rise to incivility, wherein health attitudes often hinge more on political ideology than science.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, incivility has not been studied in the context of discourse regarding COVID-19 vaccines and mandates. Specifically, there is little focus on the psychological processes that elicit uncivil vaccine discourse and behaviors. Thus, we investigated 3 psychological processes theorized to predict discourse incivility-namely, anxiety, anger, and sadness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2 different natural language processing approaches: (1) the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count computational tool and (2) the Google Perspective application programming interface (API) to analyze a data set of 8014 tweets containing terms related to COVID-19 vaccine mandates from September 14, 2021, to October 1, 2021. To collect the tweets, we used the Twitter API Tweet Downloader Tool (version 2). Subsequently, we filtered through a data set of 375,000 vaccine-related tweets using keywords to extract tweets explicitly focused on vaccine mandates. We relied on the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count computational tool to measure the valence of linguistic anger, sadness, and anxiety in the tweets. To measure dimensions of post incivility, we used the Google Perspective API.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study resolved discrepant operationalizations of incivility by introducing incivility as a multifaceted construct and explored the distinct emotional processes underlying 5 dimensions of discourse incivility. The findings revealed that 3 types of emotions-anxiety, anger, and sadness-were uniquely associated with dimensions of incivility (eg, toxicity, severe toxicity, insult, profanity, threat, and identity attacks). Specifically, the results showed that anger was significantly positively associated with all dimensions of incivility (all <i>P</i><.001), whereas sadness was significantly positively related to threat (<i>P</i>=.04). Conversely, anxiety was significantly negatively associated with identity attack (<i>P</i>=.03) and profanity (<i>P</i>=.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that our multidimensional approach to incivility is a promising alternative to understanding and intervening in the psychological processes underlying uncivil vaccine discourse. Understanding specific emotions that can increase or decrease incivility such as anxiety, anger, and sadness can enable researchers and public health professionals to develop effective inte
背景:尽管有疫苗可用,但对疫苗的犹豫不决阻碍了公共卫生官员缓解 COVID-19 在美国大流行的努力。尽管一些美国民选官员已通过发布疫苗强制令作出回应,但其他一些官员则通过广播最大限度地降低疫苗功效的信息来放大疫苗犹豫不决的情绪。社交媒体上 COVID-19 信息的政治两极化性质引发了不文明现象,人们对健康的态度往往更多地取决于政治意识形态而非科学:据我们所知,在有关 COVID-19 疫苗和任务的讨论中,尚未对不文明行为进行研究。具体而言,人们很少关注引发不文明疫苗言论和行为的心理过程。因此,我们研究了理论上可预测不文明言论的 3 个心理过程,即焦虑、愤怒和悲伤:我们使用了两种不同的自然语言处理方法:(1)语言调查和字数统计计算工具;(2)Google Perspective 应用程序编程接口 (API),对 2021 年 9 月 14 日至 2021 年 10 月 1 日期间包含 COVID-19 疫苗规定相关术语的 8014 条推文数据集进行了分析。为了收集推文,我们使用了 Twitter API 推文下载工具(第 2 版)。随后,我们使用关键字过滤了 375,000 条与疫苗相关的推文数据集,提取出明确关注疫苗接种规定的推文。我们利用 "语言调查和字数统计"(Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count)计算工具来测量推文中愤怒、悲伤和焦虑的语言情绪。为了测量帖子中的不文明行为,我们使用了 Google Perspective API:本研究通过将不文明行为作为一个多层面的概念引入,解决了不文明行为在操作上的差异,并探索了话语不文明行为 5 个维度背后的不同情绪过程。研究结果显示,焦虑、愤怒和悲伤这三种情绪与不文明行为的维度(如毒性、严重毒性、侮辱、亵渎、威胁和身份攻击)有着独特的关联。具体来说,研究结果表明,愤怒与不文明行为的所有维度都有显著的正相关(PP=0.04)。相反,焦虑与身份攻击(P=.03)和亵渎(P=.02)明显负相关:结果表明,我们的多维不文明行为研究方法是了解和干预不文明疫苗言论背后的心理过程的一种很有前途的替代方法。了解焦虑、愤怒和悲伤等会增加或减少不文明行为的特定情绪,可以帮助研究人员和公共卫生专业人员针对不文明疫苗言论制定有效的干预措施。鉴于需要对网络上传播的健康信息和错误信息进行实时监控和自动响应,社交媒体平台可以利用谷歌视角应用程序接口(Google Perspective API),在检测到不文明评论时向用户提供即时的自动反馈。
{"title":"Emotions and Incivility in Vaccine Mandate Discourse: Natural Language Processing Insights.","authors":"Hannah Stevens, Muhammad Ehab Rasul, Yoo Jung Oh","doi":"10.2196/37635","DOIUrl":"10.2196/37635","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Despite vaccine availability, vaccine hesitancy has inhibited public health officials' efforts to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Although some US elected officials have responded by issuing vaccine mandates, others have amplified vaccine hesitancy by broadcasting messages that minimize vaccine efficacy. The politically polarized nature of COVID-19 information on social media has given rise to incivility, wherein health attitudes often hinge more on political ideology than science.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To the best of our knowledge, incivility has not been studied in the context of discourse regarding COVID-19 vaccines and mandates. Specifically, there is little focus on the psychological processes that elicit uncivil vaccine discourse and behaviors. Thus, we investigated 3 psychological processes theorized to predict discourse incivility-namely, anxiety, anger, and sadness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We used 2 different natural language processing approaches: (1) the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count computational tool and (2) the Google Perspective application programming interface (API) to analyze a data set of 8014 tweets containing terms related to COVID-19 vaccine mandates from September 14, 2021, to October 1, 2021. To collect the tweets, we used the Twitter API Tweet Downloader Tool (version 2). Subsequently, we filtered through a data set of 375,000 vaccine-related tweets using keywords to extract tweets explicitly focused on vaccine mandates. We relied on the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count computational tool to measure the valence of linguistic anger, sadness, and anxiety in the tweets. To measure dimensions of post incivility, we used the Google Perspective API.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;This study resolved discrepant operationalizations of incivility by introducing incivility as a multifaceted construct and explored the distinct emotional processes underlying 5 dimensions of discourse incivility. The findings revealed that 3 types of emotions-anxiety, anger, and sadness-were uniquely associated with dimensions of incivility (eg, toxicity, severe toxicity, insult, profanity, threat, and identity attacks). Specifically, the results showed that anger was significantly positively associated with all dimensions of incivility (all &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;.001), whereas sadness was significantly positively related to threat (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=.04). Conversely, anxiety was significantly negatively associated with identity attack (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=.03) and profanity (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=.02).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The results suggest that our multidimensional approach to incivility is a promising alternative to understanding and intervening in the psychological processes underlying uncivil vaccine discourse. Understanding specific emotions that can increase or decrease incivility such as anxiety, anger, and sadness can enable researchers and public health professionals to develop effective inte","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e37635"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9511016/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9704987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 Misinformation Detection: Machine-Learned Solutions to the Infodemic. COVID-19 误报检测:机器学习信息解决方案。
IF 3.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-08-25 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/38756
Nikhil Kolluri, Yunong Liu, Dhiraj Murthy
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The volume of COVID-19-related misinformation has long exceeded the resources available to fact checkers to effectively mitigate its ill effects. Automated and web-based approaches can provide effective deterrents to online misinformation. Machine learning-based methods have achieved robust performance on text classification tasks, including potentially low-quality-news credibility assessment. Despite the progress of initial, rapid interventions, the enormity of COVID-19-related misinformation continues to overwhelm fact checkers. Therefore, improvement in automated and machine-learned methods for an infodemic response is urgently needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to achieve improvement in automated and machine-learned methods for an infodemic response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated three strategies for training a machine-learning model to determine the highest model performance: (1) COVID-19-related fact-checked data only, (2) general fact-checked data only, and (3) combined COVID-19 and general fact-checked data. We created two COVID-19-related misinformation data sets from fact-checked "false" content combined with programmatically retrieved "true" content. The first set contained ~7000 entries from July to August 2020, and the second contained ~31,000 entries from January 2020 to June 2022. We crowdsourced 31,441 votes to human label the first data set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The models achieved an accuracy of 96.55% and 94.56% on the first and second external validation data set, respectively. Our best-performing model was developed using COVID-19-specific content. We were able to successfully develop combined models that outperformed human votes of misinformation. Specifically, when we blended our model predictions with human votes, the highest accuracy we achieved on the first external validation data set was 99.1%. When we considered outputs where the machine-learning model agreed with human votes, we achieved accuracies up to 98.59% on the first validation data set. This outperformed human votes alone with an accuracy of only 73%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>External validation accuracies of 96.55% and 94.56% are evidence that machine learning can produce superior results for the difficult task of classifying the veracity of COVID-19 content. Pretrained language models performed best when fine-tuned on a topic-specific data set, while other models achieved their best accuracy when fine-tuned on a combination of topic-specific and general-topic data sets. Crucially, our study found that blended models, trained/fine-tuned on general-topic content with crowdsourced data, improved our models' accuracies up to 99.7%. The successful use of crowdsourced data can increase the accuracy of models in situations when expert-labeled data are scarce. The 98.59% accuracy on a "high-confidence" subsection comprised of machine-learned and human labels sugges
背景:与 COVID-19 相关的虚假信息数量之大,早已超出了事实核查人员可用的资源,无法有效减轻其不良影响。自动化和基于网络的方法可以有效遏制网络误报。基于机器学习的方法已经在文本分类任务中取得了优异的成绩,包括潜在的低质量新闻可信度评估。尽管最初的快速干预措施取得了进展,但与 COVID-19 相关的大量错误信息仍然让事实核查人员不堪重负。因此,迫切需要改进自动和机器学习方法,以应对信息瘟疫:本研究的目的是改进自动和机器学习方法,以应对信息瘟疫:我们评估了训练机器学习模型的三种策略,以确定最高的模型性能:(1) 仅使用 COVID-19 相关事实校验数据,(2) 仅使用一般事实校验数据,(3) 结合 COVID-19 和一般事实校验数据。我们创建了两个与 COVID-19 相关的错误信息数据集,这些数据集由经过事实核查的 "虚假 "内容和通过程序检索的 "真实 "内容组成。第一个数据集包含 2020 年 7 月至 8 月的约 7000 个条目,第二个数据集包含 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月的约 31000 个条目。我们通过众包获得了 31,441 张选票,对第一组数据进行了人工标注:在第一个和第二个外部验证数据集上,模型的准确率分别达到 96.55% 和 94.56%。我们使用 COVID-19 的特定内容开发了表现最佳的模型。我们成功地开发出了组合模型,其表现优于对错误信息的人工投票。具体来说,当我们将模型预测与人工投票相结合时,我们在第一个外部验证数据集上达到的最高准确率为 99.1%。当我们考虑机器学习模型与人工投票一致的输出时,我们在第一个验证数据集上的准确率高达 98.59%。这超过了仅有 73% 的人工投票准确率:96.55%和94.56%的外部验证准确率证明,机器学习可以在对COVID-19内容的真实性进行分类这一艰巨任务中取得优异成绩。预训练的语言模型在特定主题数据集上进行微调时表现最佳,而其他模型在特定主题数据集和一般主题数据集的组合上进行微调时则达到最佳准确率。重要的是,我们的研究发现,在一般主题内容与众包数据上训练/微调的混合模型可将我们模型的准确率提高到 99.7%。在缺乏专家标签数据的情况下,成功使用众包数据可以提高模型的准确性。由机器学习标签和人工标签组成的 "高置信度 "分节的准确率为 98.59%,这表明众包投票可以优化机器学习标签,从而将准确率提高到纯人工水平之上。这些结果支持了监督机器学习在阻止和打击未来健康相关虚假信息方面的实用性。
{"title":"COVID-19 Misinformation Detection: Machine-Learned Solutions to the Infodemic.","authors":"Nikhil Kolluri, Yunong Liu, Dhiraj Murthy","doi":"10.2196/38756","DOIUrl":"10.2196/38756","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The volume of COVID-19-related misinformation has long exceeded the resources available to fact checkers to effectively mitigate its ill effects. Automated and web-based approaches can provide effective deterrents to online misinformation. Machine learning-based methods have achieved robust performance on text classification tasks, including potentially low-quality-news credibility assessment. Despite the progress of initial, rapid interventions, the enormity of COVID-19-related misinformation continues to overwhelm fact checkers. Therefore, improvement in automated and machine-learned methods for an infodemic response is urgently needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The aim of this study was to achieve improvement in automated and machine-learned methods for an infodemic response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We evaluated three strategies for training a machine-learning model to determine the highest model performance: (1) COVID-19-related fact-checked data only, (2) general fact-checked data only, and (3) combined COVID-19 and general fact-checked data. We created two COVID-19-related misinformation data sets from fact-checked \"false\" content combined with programmatically retrieved \"true\" content. The first set contained ~7000 entries from July to August 2020, and the second contained ~31,000 entries from January 2020 to June 2022. We crowdsourced 31,441 votes to human label the first data set.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The models achieved an accuracy of 96.55% and 94.56% on the first and second external validation data set, respectively. Our best-performing model was developed using COVID-19-specific content. We were able to successfully develop combined models that outperformed human votes of misinformation. Specifically, when we blended our model predictions with human votes, the highest accuracy we achieved on the first external validation data set was 99.1%. When we considered outputs where the machine-learning model agreed with human votes, we achieved accuracies up to 98.59% on the first validation data set. This outperformed human votes alone with an accuracy of only 73%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;External validation accuracies of 96.55% and 94.56% are evidence that machine learning can produce superior results for the difficult task of classifying the veracity of COVID-19 content. Pretrained language models performed best when fine-tuned on a topic-specific data set, while other models achieved their best accuracy when fine-tuned on a combination of topic-specific and general-topic data sets. Crucially, our study found that blended models, trained/fine-tuned on general-topic content with crowdsourced data, improved our models' accuracies up to 99.7%. The successful use of crowdsourced data can increase the accuracy of models in situations when expert-labeled data are scarce. The 98.59% accuracy on a \"high-confidence\" subsection comprised of machine-learned and human labels sugges","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e38756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987189/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9733183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Web-Based Perspectives of Deemed Consent Organ Donation Legislation in Nova Scotia: Thematic Analysis of Commentary in Facebook Groups. 新斯科舍省器官捐赠立法的网络视角:Facebook群组评论的专题分析。
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/38242
Alessandro R Marcon, Darren N Wagner, Carly Giles, Cynthia Isenor

Background: The Canadian province of Nova Scotia recently became the first jurisdiction in North America to implement deemed consent organ donation legislation. Changing the consent models constituted one aspect of a larger provincial program to increase organ and tissue donation and transplantation rates. Deemed consent legislation can be controversial among the public, and public participation is integral to the successful implementation of the program.

Objective: Social media constitutes key spaces where people express opinions and discuss topics, and social media discourse can influence public perceptions. This project aimed to examine how the public in Nova Scotia responded to legislative changes in Facebook groups.

Methods: Using Facebook's search engine, we searched for posts in public Facebook groups using the terms "deemed consent," "presumed consent," "opt out," or "organ donation" and "Nova Scotia," appearing from January 1, 2020, to May 1, 2021. The finalized data set included 2337 comments on 26 relevant posts in 12 different public Nova Scotia-based Facebook groups. We conducted thematic and content analyses of the comments to determine how the public responded to the legislative changes and how the participants interacted with one another in the discussions.

Results: Our thematic analysis revealed principal themes that supported and critiqued the legislation, raised specific issues, and reflected on the topic from a neutral perspective. Subthemes showed individuals presenting perspectives through a variety of themes, including compassion, anger, frustration, mistrust, and a range of argumentative tactics. The comments included personal narratives, beliefs about the government, altruism, autonomy, misinformation, and reflections on religion and death. Content analysis revealed that Facebook users reacted to popular comments with "likes" more than other reactions. Comments with the most reactions included both negative and positive perspectives about the legislation. Personal donation and transplantation success stories, as well as attempts to correct misinformation, were some of the most "liked" positive comments.

Conclusions: The findings provide key insights into perspectives of individuals from Nova Scotia on deemed consent legislation, as well as organ donation and transplantation broadly. The insights derived from this analysis can contribute to public understanding, policy creation, and public outreach efforts that might occur in other jurisdictions considering the enactment of similar legislation.

背景:加拿大新斯科舍省最近成为北美第一个实施视为同意器官捐赠立法的司法管辖区。改变同意模式是一个更大的省级计划的一个方面,以提高器官和组织捐赠和移植率。被视为同意的立法可能在公众中引起争议,公众参与是该计划成功实施的组成部分。目的:社交媒体是人们表达意见和讨论话题的关键空间,社交媒体话语可以影响公众的看法。这个项目旨在研究新斯科舍省的公众如何回应Facebook群组的立法变化。方法:使用Facebook的搜索引擎,我们搜索了2020年1月1日至2021年5月1日期间出现在Facebook公共群组中使用“视为同意”、“推定同意”、“选择退出”或“器官捐赠”和“新斯科舍省”等术语的帖子。最终确定的数据集包括对新斯科舍省12个不同公共Facebook群组中26个相关帖子的2337条评论。我们对意见进行主题和内容分析,以确定公众对立法改革的反应,以及与会者在讨论中如何相互作用。结果:我们的专题分析揭示了支持和批评立法的主要主题,提出了具体问题,并从中立的角度对主题进行了反思。副主题展示了个人通过各种主题表达观点,包括同情、愤怒、沮丧、不信任和一系列争论策略。这些评论包括个人叙述、对政府的信念、利他主义、自治、错误信息以及对宗教和死亡的反思。内容分析显示,Facebook用户对热门评论的“喜欢”反应多于其他反应。反应最多的评论包括对立法的负面和正面看法。个人捐赠和移植的成功故事,以及纠正错误信息的努力,是最受“喜欢”的积极评论。结论:研究结果为新斯科舍省个人对视为同意立法以及广泛的器官捐赠和移植的看法提供了关键见解。从这一分析中得出的见解可以有助于其他考虑制定类似立法的司法管辖区的公众理解、政策制定和公众宣传工作。
{"title":"Web-Based Perspectives of Deemed Consent Organ Donation Legislation in Nova Scotia: Thematic Analysis of Commentary in Facebook Groups.","authors":"Alessandro R Marcon,&nbsp;Darren N Wagner,&nbsp;Carly Giles,&nbsp;Cynthia Isenor","doi":"10.2196/38242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/38242","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Canadian province of Nova Scotia recently became the first jurisdiction in North America to implement deemed consent organ donation legislation. Changing the consent models constituted one aspect of a larger provincial program to increase organ and tissue donation and transplantation rates. Deemed consent legislation can be controversial among the public, and public participation is integral to the successful implementation of the program.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Social media constitutes key spaces where people express opinions and discuss topics, and social media discourse can influence public perceptions. This project aimed to examine how the public in Nova Scotia responded to legislative changes in Facebook groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Facebook's search engine, we searched for posts in public Facebook groups using the terms \"deemed consent,\" \"presumed consent,\" \"opt out,\" or \"organ donation\" and \"Nova Scotia,\" appearing from January 1, 2020, to May 1, 2021. The finalized data set included 2337 comments on 26 relevant posts in 12 different public Nova Scotia-based Facebook groups. We conducted thematic and content analyses of the comments to determine how the public responded to the legislative changes and how the participants interacted with one another in the discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our thematic analysis revealed principal themes that supported and critiqued the legislation, raised specific issues, and reflected on the topic from a neutral perspective. Subthemes showed individuals presenting perspectives through a variety of themes, including compassion, anger, frustration, mistrust, and a range of argumentative tactics. The comments included personal narratives, beliefs about the government, altruism, autonomy, misinformation, and reflections on religion and death. Content analysis revealed that Facebook users reacted to popular comments with \"likes\" more than other reactions. Comments with the most reactions included both negative and positive perspectives about the legislation. Personal donation and transplantation success stories, as well as attempts to correct misinformation, were some of the most \"liked\" positive comments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings provide key insights into perspectives of individuals from Nova Scotia on deemed consent legislation, as well as organ donation and transplantation broadly. The insights derived from this analysis can contribute to public understanding, policy creation, and public outreach efforts that might occur in other jurisdictions considering the enactment of similar legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e38242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987187/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9718458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Confounding Effect of Undergraduate Semester-Driven "Academic" Internet Searches on the Ability to Detect True Disease Seasonality in Google Trends Data: Fourier Filter Method Development and Demonstration. 本科学期驱动的“学术”互联网搜索对在Google趋势数据中检测真实疾病季节性的能力的混淆效应:傅立叶滤波方法的开发和演示。
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/34464
Timber Gillis, Scott Garrison
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internet search volume for medical information, as tracked by Google Trends, has been used to demonstrate unexpected seasonality in the symptom burden of a variety of medical conditions. However, when more technical medical language is used (eg, diagnoses), we believe that this technique is confounded by the cyclic, school year-driven internet search patterns of health care students.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) demonstrate that artificial "academic cycling" of Google Trends' search volume is present in many health care terms, (2) demonstrate how signal processing techniques can be used to filter academic cycling out of Google Trends data, and (3) apply this filtering technique to some clinically relevant examples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained the Google Trends search volume data for a variety of academic terms demonstrating strong academic cycling and used a Fourier analysis technique to (1) identify the frequency domain fingerprint of this modulating pattern in one particularly strong example, and (2) filter that pattern out of the original data. After this illustrative example, we then applied the same filtering technique to internet searches for information on 3 medical conditions believed to have true seasonal modulation (myocardial infarction, hypertension, and depression), and all bacterial genus terms within a common medical microbiology textbook.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Academic cycling explains much of the seasonal variation in internet search volume for many technically oriented search terms, including the bacterial genus term ["Staphylococcus"], for which academic cycling explained 73.8% of the variability in search volume (using the squared Spearman rank correlation coefficient, <i>P</i><.001). Of the 56 bacterial genus terms examined, 6 displayed sufficiently strong seasonality to warrant further examination post filtering. This included (1) ["Aeromonas" + "Plesiomonas"] (nosocomial infections that were searched for more frequently during the summer), (2) ["Ehrlichia"] (a tick-borne pathogen that was searched for more frequently during late spring), (3) ["Moraxella"] and ["Haemophilus"] (respiratory infections that were searched for more frequently during late winter), (4) ["Legionella"] (searched for more frequently during midsummer), and (5) ["Vibrio"] (which spiked for 2 months during midsummer). The terms ["myocardial infarction"] and ["hypertension"] lacked any obvious seasonal cycling after filtering, whereas ["depression"] maintained an annual cycling pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although it is reasonable to search for seasonal modulation of medical conditions using Google Trends' internet search volume and lay-appropriate search terms, the variation in more technical search terms may be driven by health care students whose search frequency varies with the academic school year. When this is the case, using Fourier analysis to f
背景:谷歌趋势(Google Trends)追踪的互联网医疗信息搜索量已被用于证明各种医疗状况的症状负担中意想不到的季节性。然而,当使用更多的专业医学语言(例如诊断)时,我们认为这种技术被循环的、学年驱动的医疗保健学生的互联网搜索模式所混淆。目的:本研究旨在(1)证明谷歌趋势搜索量的人为“学术循环”存在于许多医疗保健术语中,(2)证明如何使用信号处理技术从谷歌趋势数据中过滤学术循环,以及(3)将这种过滤技术应用于一些临床相关的例子。方法:我们获得了各种学术术语的Google Trends搜索量数据,显示出很强的学术循环,并使用傅里叶分析技术(1)在一个特别强的例子中识别出这种调制模式的频域指纹,(2)从原始数据中过滤出该模式。在这个说述性的例子之后,我们将同样的过滤技术应用于互联网搜索有关3种被认为具有真正季节性调节的医学病症(心肌梗死、高血压和抑郁症)的信息,以及一本普通医学微生物学教科书中的所有细菌属术语。结果:学术循环解释了许多以技术为导向的搜索词的互联网搜索量的季节性变化,包括细菌属术语[“葡萄球菌”],其中学术循环解释了搜索量变化的73.8%(使用平方Spearman秩相关系数,p)。虽然使用谷歌趋势的互联网搜索量和适合的搜索词来搜索医疗状况的季节性变化是合理的,但更多技术搜索词的变化可能是由医疗保健专业的学生驱动的,他们的搜索频率随着学年的变化而变化。在这种情况下,使用傅立叶分析来过滤掉学术周期是确定是否存在额外季节性的潜在手段。
{"title":"Confounding Effect of Undergraduate Semester-Driven \"Academic\" Internet Searches on the Ability to Detect True Disease Seasonality in Google Trends Data: Fourier Filter Method Development and Demonstration.","authors":"Timber Gillis,&nbsp;Scott Garrison","doi":"10.2196/34464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/34464","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Internet search volume for medical information, as tracked by Google Trends, has been used to demonstrate unexpected seasonality in the symptom burden of a variety of medical conditions. However, when more technical medical language is used (eg, diagnoses), we believe that this technique is confounded by the cyclic, school year-driven internet search patterns of health care students.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aimed to (1) demonstrate that artificial \"academic cycling\" of Google Trends' search volume is present in many health care terms, (2) demonstrate how signal processing techniques can be used to filter academic cycling out of Google Trends data, and (3) apply this filtering technique to some clinically relevant examples.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We obtained the Google Trends search volume data for a variety of academic terms demonstrating strong academic cycling and used a Fourier analysis technique to (1) identify the frequency domain fingerprint of this modulating pattern in one particularly strong example, and (2) filter that pattern out of the original data. After this illustrative example, we then applied the same filtering technique to internet searches for information on 3 medical conditions believed to have true seasonal modulation (myocardial infarction, hypertension, and depression), and all bacterial genus terms within a common medical microbiology textbook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Academic cycling explains much of the seasonal variation in internet search volume for many technically oriented search terms, including the bacterial genus term [\"Staphylococcus\"], for which academic cycling explained 73.8% of the variability in search volume (using the squared Spearman rank correlation coefficient, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;.001). Of the 56 bacterial genus terms examined, 6 displayed sufficiently strong seasonality to warrant further examination post filtering. This included (1) [\"Aeromonas\" + \"Plesiomonas\"] (nosocomial infections that were searched for more frequently during the summer), (2) [\"Ehrlichia\"] (a tick-borne pathogen that was searched for more frequently during late spring), (3) [\"Moraxella\"] and [\"Haemophilus\"] (respiratory infections that were searched for more frequently during late winter), (4) [\"Legionella\"] (searched for more frequently during midsummer), and (5) [\"Vibrio\"] (which spiked for 2 months during midsummer). The terms [\"myocardial infarction\"] and [\"hypertension\"] lacked any obvious seasonal cycling after filtering, whereas [\"depression\"] maintained an annual cycling pattern.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Although it is reasonable to search for seasonal modulation of medical conditions using Google Trends' internet search volume and lay-appropriate search terms, the variation in more technical search terms may be driven by health care students whose search frequency varies with the academic school year. When this is the case, using Fourier analysis to f","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e34464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987186/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9733181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Monitoring Mentions of COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects on Japanese and Indonesian Twitter: Infodemiological Study. 监测日本和印度尼西亚推特上对COVID-19疫苗副作用的提及:信息流行病学研究
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/39504
Kiki Ferawati, Kongmeng Liew, Eiji Aramaki, Shoko Wakamiya

Background: The year 2021 was marked by vaccinations against COVID-19, which spurred wider discussion among the general population, with some in favor and some against vaccination. Twitter, a popular social media platform, was instrumental in providing information about the COVID-19 vaccine and has been effective in observing public reactions. We focused on tweets from Japan and Indonesia, 2 countries with a large Twitter-using population, where concerns about side effects were consistently stated as a strong reason for vaccine hesitancy.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate how Twitter was used to report vaccine-related side effects and to compare the mentions of these side effects from 2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine types developed by Pfizer and Moderna, in Japan and Indonesia.

Methods: We obtained tweet data from Twitter using Japanese and Indonesian keywords related to COVID-19 vaccines and their side effects from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. We then removed users with a high frequency of tweets and merged the tweets from multiple users as a single sentence to focus on user-level analysis, resulting in a total of 214,165 users (Japan) and 12,289 users (Indonesia). Then, we filtered the data to select tweets mentioning Pfizer or Moderna only and removed tweets mentioning both. We compared the side effect counts to the public reports released by Pfizer and Moderna. Afterward, logistic regression models were used to compare the side effects for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for each country.

Results: We observed some differences in the ratio of side effects between the public reports and tweets. Specifically, fever was mentioned much more frequently in tweets than would be expected based on the public reports. We also observed differences in side effects reported between Pfizer and Moderna vaccines from Japan and Indonesia, with more side effects reported for the Pfizer vaccine in Japanese tweets and more side effects with the Moderna vaccine reported in Indonesian tweets.

Conclusions: We note the possible consequences of vaccine side effect surveillance on Twitter and information dissemination, in that fever appears to be over-represented. This could be due to fever possibly having a higher severity or measurability, and further implications are discussed.

背景:2021年是预防COVID-19疫苗接种的一年,这在普通人群中引发了更广泛的讨论,有些人赞成接种疫苗,有些人反对接种疫苗。受欢迎的社交媒体平台推特在提供有关COVID-19疫苗的信息方面发挥了重要作用,并有效地观察了公众的反应。我们关注的是来自日本和印度尼西亚的推文,这两个国家有大量的twitter用户,在这两个国家,对副作用的担忧一直被认为是疫苗犹豫的一个重要原因。目的:本研究旨在调查Twitter如何被用来报道疫苗相关的副作用,并比较辉瑞和Moderna在日本和印度尼西亚开发的两种信使RNA (mRNA)疫苗类型对这些副作用的提及。方法:从Twitter上获取2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日与COVID-19疫苗及其副作用相关的日语和印度尼西亚语关键词的推文数据。然后,我们删除了推文频率高的用户,并将多个用户的推文合并为一个句子,专注于用户层面的分析,结果是总共有214,165个用户(日本)和12,289个用户(印度尼西亚)。然后,我们对数据进行过滤,选择只提到辉瑞或Moderna的推文,并删除同时提到辉瑞和Moderna的推文。我们将副作用数与辉瑞和Moderna发布的公开报告进行了比较。之后,使用逻辑回归模型比较辉瑞和Moderna疫苗在每个国家的副作用。结果:我们观察到公开报道和推文的副作用比例有所不同。具体来说,“发烧”在推特上被提及的频率远高于公开报道的预期。我们还观察到来自日本和印度尼西亚的辉瑞疫苗和Moderna疫苗报道的副作用差异,日本推文报道的辉瑞疫苗副作用较多,印度尼西亚推文报道的Moderna疫苗副作用较多。结论:我们注意到Twitter上疫苗副作用监测和信息传播的可能后果,因为发烧似乎被过度代表。这可能是由于发热可能具有更高的严重性或可测量性,并讨论了进一步的影响。
{"title":"Monitoring Mentions of COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects on Japanese and Indonesian Twitter: Infodemiological Study.","authors":"Kiki Ferawati,&nbsp;Kongmeng Liew,&nbsp;Eiji Aramaki,&nbsp;Shoko Wakamiya","doi":"10.2196/39504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/39504","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The year 2021 was marked by vaccinations against COVID-19, which spurred wider discussion among the general population, with some in favor and some against vaccination. Twitter, a popular social media platform, was instrumental in providing information about the COVID-19 vaccine and has been effective in observing public reactions. We focused on tweets from Japan and Indonesia, 2 countries with a large Twitter-using population, where concerns about side effects were consistently stated as a strong reason for vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how Twitter was used to report vaccine-related side effects and to compare the mentions of these side effects from 2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine types developed by Pfizer and Moderna, in Japan and Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained tweet data from Twitter using Japanese and Indonesian keywords related to COVID-19 vaccines and their side effects from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. We then removed users with a high frequency of tweets and merged the tweets from multiple users as a single sentence to focus on user-level analysis, resulting in a total of 214,165 users (Japan) and 12,289 users (Indonesia). Then, we filtered the data to select tweets mentioning Pfizer or Moderna only and removed tweets mentioning both. We compared the side effect counts to the public reports released by Pfizer and Moderna. Afterward, logistic regression models were used to compare the side effects for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for each country.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed some differences in the ratio of side effects between the public reports and tweets. Specifically, fever was mentioned much more frequently in tweets than would be expected based on the public reports. We also observed differences in side effects reported between Pfizer and Moderna vaccines from Japan and Indonesia, with more side effects reported for the Pfizer vaccine in Japanese tweets and more side effects with the Moderna vaccine reported in Indonesian tweets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We note the possible consequences of vaccine side effect surveillance on Twitter and information dissemination, in that fever appears to be over-represented. This could be due to fever possibly having a higher severity or measurability, and further implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e39504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578292/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9349248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Codeveloping and Evaluating a Campaign to Reduce Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Machine Learning Study. 共同开发和评估在Twitter上减少痴呆症误解的运动:机器学习研究。
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/36871
Sinan Erturk, Georgie Hudson, Sonja M Jansli, Daniel Morris, Clarissa M Odoi, Emma Wilson, Angela Clayton-Turner, Vanessa Bray, Gill Yourston, Andrew Cornwall, Nicholas Cummins, Til Wykes, Sagar Jilka

Background: Dementia misconceptions on Twitter can have detrimental or harmful effects. Machine learning (ML) models codeveloped with carers provide a method to identify these and help in evaluating awareness campaigns.

Objective: This study aimed to develop an ML model to distinguish between misconceptions and neutral tweets and to develop, deploy, and evaluate an awareness campaign to tackle dementia misconceptions.

Methods: Taking 1414 tweets rated by carers from our previous work, we built 4 ML models. Using a 5-fold cross-validation, we evaluated them and performed a further blind validation with carers for the best 2 ML models; from this blind validation, we selected the best model overall. We codeveloped an awareness campaign and collected pre-post campaign tweets (N=4880), classifying them with our model as misconceptions or not. We analyzed dementia tweets from the United Kingdom across the campaign period (N=7124) to investigate how current events influenced misconception prevalence during this time.

Results: A random forest model best identified misconceptions with an accuracy of 82% from blind validation and found that 37% of the UK tweets (N=7124) about dementia across the campaign period were misconceptions. From this, we could track how the prevalence of misconceptions changed in response to top news stories in the United Kingdom. Misconceptions significantly rose around political topics and were highest (22/28, 79% of the dementia tweets) when there was controversy over the UK government allowing to continue hunting during the COVID-19 pandemic. After our campaign, there was no significant change in the prevalence of misconceptions.

Conclusions: Through codevelopment with carers, we developed an accurate ML model to predict misconceptions in dementia tweets. Our awareness campaign was ineffective, but similar campaigns could be enhanced through ML to respond to current events that affect misconceptions in real time.

背景:Twitter上对痴呆症的误解可能会产生有害或有害的影响。与护理人员共同开发的机器学习(ML)模型提供了一种识别这些问题的方法,并有助于评估宣传活动。目的:本研究旨在开发一个ML模型来区分误解和中性推文,并开发、部署和评估一项解决痴呆症误解的宣传活动。方法:从我们之前的工作中提取1414条由护理人员评分的推文,我们建立了4个ML模型。使用5倍交叉验证,我们对它们进行了评估,并与护理人员进行了进一步的盲验证,以获得最佳的2ml模型;从这个盲验证中,我们选择了最好的模型。我们共同开发了一个宣传活动,并收集了活动前的推文(N=4880),用我们的模型将它们分类为误解或非误解。我们分析了整个竞选期间来自英国的痴呆症推文(N=7124),以调查当前事件如何影响这段时间的误解流行。结果:随机森林模型通过盲法验证以82%的准确率最好地识别了误解,并发现在整个竞选期间,37%关于痴呆症的英国推文(N=7124)是误解。由此,我们可以追踪误解的普遍程度是如何随着英国的头条新闻而变化的。围绕政治话题的误解显著增加,当英国政府在COVID-19大流行期间允许继续狩猎存在争议时,误解最高(22/28,占痴呆症推文的79%)。在我们的竞选活动之后,普遍存在的误解并没有显著改变。结论:通过与护理人员共同开发,我们开发了一个准确的ML模型来预测痴呆症推文中的误解。我们的宣传活动是无效的,但类似的活动可以通过ML来增强,以实时响应影响误解的当前事件。
{"title":"Codeveloping and Evaluating a Campaign to Reduce Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Machine Learning Study.","authors":"Sinan Erturk,&nbsp;Georgie Hudson,&nbsp;Sonja M Jansli,&nbsp;Daniel Morris,&nbsp;Clarissa M Odoi,&nbsp;Emma Wilson,&nbsp;Angela Clayton-Turner,&nbsp;Vanessa Bray,&nbsp;Gill Yourston,&nbsp;Andrew Cornwall,&nbsp;Nicholas Cummins,&nbsp;Til Wykes,&nbsp;Sagar Jilka","doi":"10.2196/36871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/36871","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia misconceptions on Twitter can have detrimental or harmful effects. Machine learning (ML) models codeveloped with carers provide a method to identify these and help in evaluating awareness campaigns.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop an ML model to distinguish between misconceptions and neutral tweets and to develop, deploy, and evaluate an awareness campaign to tackle dementia misconceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Taking 1414 tweets rated by carers from our previous work, we built 4 ML models. Using a 5-fold cross-validation, we evaluated them and performed a further blind validation with carers for the best 2 ML models; from this blind validation, we selected the best model overall. We codeveloped an awareness campaign and collected pre-post campaign tweets (N=4880), classifying them with our model as misconceptions or not. We analyzed dementia tweets from the United Kingdom across the campaign period (N=7124) to investigate how current events influenced misconception prevalence during this time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A random forest model best identified misconceptions with an accuracy of 82% from blind validation and found that 37% of the UK tweets (N=7124) about dementia across the campaign period were misconceptions. From this, we could track how the prevalence of misconceptions changed in response to top news stories in the United Kingdom. Misconceptions significantly rose around political topics and were highest (22/28, 79% of the dementia tweets) when there was controversy over the UK government allowing to continue hunting during the COVID-19 pandemic. After our campaign, there was no significant change in the prevalence of misconceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through codevelopment with carers, we developed an accurate ML model to predict misconceptions in dementia tweets. Our awareness campaign was ineffective, but similar campaigns could be enhanced through ML to respond to current events that affect misconceptions in real time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e36871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987190/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9421213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social Listening to Enhance Access to Appropriate Pandemic Information Among Culturally Diverse Populations: Case Study From Finland. 社会倾听促进不同文化人群获得适当的流行病信息:来自芬兰的案例研究
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/38343
Anna-Leena Lohiniva, Katja Sibenberg, Sara Austero, Natalia Skogberg

Background: Social listening, the process of monitoring and analyzing conversations to inform communication activities, is an essential component of infodemic management. It helps inform context-specific communication strategies that are culturally acceptable and appropriate for various subpopulations. Social listening is based on the notion that target audiences themselves can best define their own information needs and messages.

Objective: This study aimed to describe the development of systematic social listening training for crisis communication and community outreach during the COVID-19 pandemic through a series of web-based workshops and to report the experiences of the workshop participants implementing the projects.

Methods: A multidisciplinary team of experts developed a series of web-based training sessions for individuals responsible for community outreach or communication among linguistically diverse populations. The participants had no previous training in systematic data collection or monitoring. This training aimed to provide participants with sufficient knowledge and skills to develop a social listening system based on their specific needs and available resources. The workshop design took into consideration the pandemic context and focused on qualitative data collection. Information on the experiences of the participants in the training was gathered based on participant feedback and their assignments and through in-depth interviews with each team.

Results: A series of 6 web-based workshops was conducted between May and September 2021. The workshops followed a systematic approach to social listening and included listening to web-based and offline sources; rapid qualitative analysis and synthesis; and developing communication recommendations, messages, and products. Follow-up meetings were organized between the workshops during which participants could share their achievements and challenges. Approximately 67% (4/6) of the participating teams established social listening systems by the end of the training. The teams tailored the knowledge provided during the training to their specific needs. As a result, the social systems developed by the teams had slightly different structures, target audiences, and aims. All resulting social listening systems followed the taught key principles of systematic social listening to collect and analyze data and used these new insights for further development of communication strategies.

Conclusions: This paper describes an infodemic management system and workflow based on qualitative inquiry and adapted to local priorities and resources. The implementation of these projects resulted in content development for targeted risk communication, addressing linguistically diverse populations. These systems can be adapted for future epidemics and pandemics.

背景:社会倾听是监测和分析对话以通知沟通活动的过程,是信息管理的重要组成部分。它有助于为在文化上可接受并适合不同亚群体的特定环境的传播策略提供信息。社交倾听是基于目标受众自己可以最好地定义自己的信息需求和信息的概念。目的:本研究旨在通过一系列基于网络的讲习班描述COVID-19大流行期间危机沟通和社区外展的系统社会倾听培训的发展情况,并报告讲习班参与者实施项目的经验。方法:一个多学科专家小组为负责社区外展或在不同语言人群中进行交流的个人开发了一系列基于网络的培训课程。参与者之前没有接受过系统数据收集或监测方面的培训。该培训旨在为参与者提供足够的知识和技能,以根据他们的具体需要和现有资源开发社会倾听系统。讲习班的设计考虑到了大流行的背景,并侧重于定性数据的收集。关于培训参与者经验的信息是根据参与者的反馈和他们的任务,并通过对每个小组的深入访谈收集的。结果:在2021年5月至9月期间,开展了一系列6次基于网络的研讨会。讲习班采用了一种系统的社会倾听方法,包括听取基于网络和离线的资源;快速定性分析与合成;开发沟通建议、信息和产品。在讲习班之间组织了后续会议,与会者可以在会上分享他们的成就和挑战。大约67%(4/6)的参与团队在培训结束时建立了社会倾听系统。团队根据他们的具体需求定制培训期间提供的知识。因此,团队开发的社会系统的结构、目标受众和目标略有不同。所有由此产生的社会倾听系统都遵循系统社会倾听的关键原则来收集和分析数据,并将这些新的见解用于进一步发展沟通策略。结论:本文描述了一种基于定性查询并适应当地优先事项和资源的信息学术管理系统和工作流程。这些项目的实施导致了针对目标风险沟通的内容开发,解决了语言多样化的人群。这些系统可以适应未来的流行病和大流行。
{"title":"Social Listening to Enhance Access to Appropriate Pandemic Information Among Culturally Diverse Populations: Case Study From Finland.","authors":"Anna-Leena Lohiniva,&nbsp;Katja Sibenberg,&nbsp;Sara Austero,&nbsp;Natalia Skogberg","doi":"10.2196/38343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/38343","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social listening, the process of monitoring and analyzing conversations to inform communication activities, is an essential component of infodemic management. It helps inform context-specific communication strategies that are culturally acceptable and appropriate for various subpopulations. Social listening is based on the notion that target audiences themselves can best define their own information needs and messages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe the development of systematic social listening training for crisis communication and community outreach during the COVID-19 pandemic through a series of web-based workshops and to report the experiences of the workshop participants implementing the projects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team of experts developed a series of web-based training sessions for individuals responsible for community outreach or communication among linguistically diverse populations. The participants had no previous training in systematic data collection or monitoring. This training aimed to provide participants with sufficient knowledge and skills to develop a social listening system based on their specific needs and available resources. The workshop design took into consideration the pandemic context and focused on qualitative data collection. Information on the experiences of the participants in the training was gathered based on participant feedback and their assignments and through in-depth interviews with each team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A series of 6 web-based workshops was conducted between May and September 2021. The workshops followed a systematic approach to social listening and included listening to web-based and offline sources; rapid qualitative analysis and synthesis; and developing communication recommendations, messages, and products. Follow-up meetings were organized between the workshops during which participants could share their achievements and challenges. Approximately 67% (4/6) of the participating teams established social listening systems by the end of the training. The teams tailored the knowledge provided during the training to their specific needs. As a result, the social systems developed by the teams had slightly different structures, target audiences, and aims. All resulting social listening systems followed the taught key principles of systematic social listening to collect and analyze data and used these new insights for further development of communication strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper describes an infodemic management system and workflow based on qualitative inquiry and adapted to local priorities and resources. The implementation of these projects resulted in content development for targeted risk communication, addressing linguistically diverse populations. These systems can be adapted for future epidemics and pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e38343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10014086/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9421219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study. COVID-19爆发后主流媒体疫苗覆盖率的量化变化:文本挖掘研究
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/35121
Bente Christensen, Daniel Laydon, Tadeusz Chelkowski, Dariusz Jemielniak, Michaela Vollmer, Samir Bhatt, Konrad Krawczyk

Background: Achieving herd immunity through vaccination depends upon the public's acceptance, which in turn relies on their understanding of its risks and benefits. The fundamental objective of public health messaging on vaccines is therefore the clear communication of often complex information and, increasingly, the countering of misinformation. The primary outlet shaping public understanding is mainstream online news media, where coverage of COVID-19 vaccines was widespread.

Objective: We used text-mining analysis on the front pages of mainstream online news to quantify the volume and sentiment polarization of vaccine coverage.

Methods: We analyzed 28 million articles from 172 major news sources across 11 countries between July 2015 and April 2021. We employed keyword-based frequency analysis to estimate the proportion of overall articles devoted to vaccines. We performed topic detection using BERTopic and named entity recognition to identify the leading subjects and actors mentioned in the context of vaccines. We used the Vader Python module to perform sentiment polarization quantification of all collated English-language articles.

Results: The proportion of front-page articles mentioning vaccines increased from 0.1% to 4% with the outbreak of COVID-19. The number of negatively polarized articles increased from 6698 in 2015-2019 to 28,552 in 2020-2021. However, overall vaccine coverage before the COVID-19 pandemic was slightly negatively polarized (57% negative), whereas coverage during the pandemic was positively polarized (38% negative).

Conclusions: Throughout the pandemic, vaccines have risen from a marginal to a widely discussed topic on the front pages of major news outlets. Mainstream online media has been positively polarized toward vaccines, compared with mainly negative prepandemic vaccine news. However, the pandemic was accompanied by an order-of-magnitude increase in vaccine news that, due to low prepandemic frequency, may contribute to a perceived negative sentiment. These results highlight important interactions between the volume of news and overall polarization. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first systematic text mining study of front-page vaccine news headlines in the context of COVID-19.

背景:通过疫苗接种实现群体免疫取决于公众的接受程度,而接受程度又取决于公众对疫苗接种的风险和益处的理解。因此,关于疫苗的公共卫生信息传递的基本目标是明确传达往往复杂的信息,并越来越多地打击错误信息。塑造公众理解的主要渠道是主流在线新闻媒体,在这些媒体上,对COVID-19疫苗的报道非常广泛。目的:利用主流网络新闻头版的文本挖掘分析,量化疫苗报道的数量和情绪两极分化。方法:我们分析了2015年7月至2021年4月期间来自11个国家172个主要新闻来源的2800万篇文章。我们采用基于关键词的频率分析来估计疫苗相关文章的比例。我们使用BERTopic和命名实体识别进行主题检测,以确定在疫苗背景下提到的主要主题和参与者。我们使用Vader Python模块对所有整理好的英语文章进行情感极化量化。结果:随着新冠肺炎疫情的爆发,提及疫苗的头版文章比例从0.1%上升到4%。负极化文章从2015-2019年的6698篇增加到2020-2021年的28552篇。然而,在COVID-19大流行之前,总体疫苗覆盖率略微呈负极化(57%为阴性),而大流行期间的覆盖率呈正极化(38%为阴性)。结论:在整个大流行期间,疫苗已从次要话题上升为主要新闻媒体头版上广泛讨论的话题。主流网络媒体一直对疫苗持积极的两极分化态度,而大流行前的疫苗新闻主要是负面的。然而,伴随着大流行的是疫苗新闻的数量级增加,由于大流行前的频率较低,这可能会导致人们产生负面情绪。这些结果突出了新闻量和整体两极分化之间的重要相互作用。据我们所知,我们的工作是在COVID-19背景下首次对头版疫苗新闻标题进行系统的文本挖掘研究。
{"title":"Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study.","authors":"Bente Christensen,&nbsp;Daniel Laydon,&nbsp;Tadeusz Chelkowski,&nbsp;Dariusz Jemielniak,&nbsp;Michaela Vollmer,&nbsp;Samir Bhatt,&nbsp;Konrad Krawczyk","doi":"10.2196/35121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/35121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving herd immunity through vaccination depends upon the public's acceptance, which in turn relies on their understanding of its risks and benefits. The fundamental objective of public health messaging on vaccines is therefore the clear communication of often complex information and, increasingly, the countering of misinformation. The primary outlet shaping public understanding is mainstream online news media, where coverage of COVID-19 vaccines was widespread.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We used text-mining analysis on the front pages of mainstream online news to quantify the volume and sentiment polarization of vaccine coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 28 million articles from 172 major news sources across 11 countries between July 2015 and April 2021. We employed keyword-based frequency analysis to estimate the proportion of overall articles devoted to vaccines. We performed topic detection using BERTopic and named entity recognition to identify the leading subjects and actors mentioned in the context of vaccines. We used the Vader Python module to perform sentiment polarization quantification of all collated English-language articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of front-page articles mentioning vaccines increased from 0.1% to 4% with the outbreak of COVID-19. The number of negatively polarized articles increased from 6698 in 2015-2019 to 28,552 in 2020-2021. However, overall vaccine coverage before the COVID-19 pandemic was slightly negatively polarized (57% negative), whereas coverage during the pandemic was positively polarized (38% negative).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Throughout the pandemic, vaccines have risen from a marginal to a widely discussed topic on the front pages of major news outlets. Mainstream online media has been positively polarized toward vaccines, compared with mainly negative prepandemic vaccine news. However, the pandemic was accompanied by an order-of-magnitude increase in vaccine news that, due to low prepandemic frequency, may contribute to a perceived negative sentiment. These results highlight important interactions between the volume of news and overall polarization. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first systematic text mining study of front-page vaccine news headlines in the context of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e35121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631944/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10793809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The Role of Information Boxes in Search Engine Results for Symptom Searches: Analysis of Archival Data. 信息框在症状搜索的搜索引擎结果中的作用:档案数据的分析。
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/37286
Lorien C Abroms, Elad Yom-Tov

Background: Search engines provide health information boxes as part of search results to address information gaps and misinformation for commonly searched symptoms. Few prior studies have sought to understand how individuals who are seeking information about health symptoms navigate different types of page elements on search engine results pages, including health information boxes.

Objective: Using real-world search engine data, this study sought to investigate how users searching for common health-related symptoms with Bing interacted with health information boxes (info boxes) and other page elements.

Methods: A sample of searches (N=28,552 unique searches) was compiled for the 17 most common medical symptoms queried on Microsoft Bing by users in the United States between September and November 2019. The association between the page elements that users saw, their characteristics, and the time spent on elements or clicks was investigated using linear and logistic regression.

Results: The number of searches ranged by symptom type from 55 searches for cramps to 7459 searches for anxiety. Users searching for common health-related symptoms saw pages with standard web results (n=24,034, 84%), itemized web results (n=23,354, 82%), ads (n=13,171, 46%), and info boxes (n=18,215, 64%). Users spent on average 22 (SD 26) seconds on the search engine results page. Users who saw all page elements spent 25% (7.1 s) of their time on the info box, 23% (6.1 s) on standard web results, 20% (5.7 s) on ads, and 10% (10 s) on itemized web results, with significantly more time on the info box compared to other elements and the least amount of time on itemized web results. Info box characteristics such as reading ease and appearance of related conditions were associated with longer time on the info box. Although none of the info box characteristics were associated with clicks on standard web results, info box characteristics such as reading ease and related searches were negatively correlated with clicks on ads.

Conclusions: Info boxes were attended most by users compared with other page elements, and their characteristics may influence future web searching. Future studies are needed that further explore the utility of info boxes and their influence on real-world health-seeking behaviors.

背景:搜索引擎提供健康信息框作为搜索结果的一部分,以解决常见搜索症状的信息空白和错误信息。之前很少有研究试图了解那些寻求健康症状信息的人如何在搜索引擎结果页面(包括健康信息框)上浏览不同类型的页面元素。目的:利用真实世界的搜索引擎数据,本研究试图调查使用必应搜索常见健康相关症状的用户如何与健康信息框(info boxes)和其他页面元素交互。方法:对2019年9月至11月期间美国用户在微软必应上查询的17种最常见的医学症状进行搜索样本(N=28,552个唯一搜索)。使用线性和逻辑回归研究了用户看到的页面元素、它们的特征以及在元素或点击上花费的时间之间的关联。结果:搜索次数按症状类型排列,从55次搜索痉挛到7459次搜索焦虑。搜索常见健康相关症状的用户看到的页面包含标准网页结果(n=24,034, 84%)、分项网页结果(n=23,354, 82%)、广告(n=13,171, 46%)和信息框(n=18,215, 64%)。用户在搜索引擎结果页面上平均花费22秒(SD 26)。浏览了所有页面元素的用户在信息框上花费了25%(7.1秒)的时间,在标准网页结果上花费了23%(6.1秒)的时间,在广告上花费了20%(5.7秒)的时间,在条目网页结果上花费了10%(10秒)的时间,在信息框上花费的时间明显多于其他元素,而在条目网页结果上花费的时间最少。信息框的特征,如阅读方便和相关条件的外观,与信息框上的时间较长有关。虽然信息框特征与标准网页结果的点击量无关,但信息框特征(如阅读难易程度和相关搜索)与广告点击量呈负相关。结论:与其他页面元素相比,用户访问信息框的次数最多,其特征可能会影响未来的网页搜索。未来的研究需要进一步探讨信息框的效用及其对现实世界寻求健康行为的影响。
{"title":"The Role of Information Boxes in Search Engine Results for Symptom Searches: Analysis of Archival Data.","authors":"Lorien C Abroms,&nbsp;Elad Yom-Tov","doi":"10.2196/37286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/37286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Search engines provide health information boxes as part of search results to address information gaps and misinformation for commonly searched symptoms. Few prior studies have sought to understand how individuals who are seeking information about health symptoms navigate different types of page elements on search engine results pages, including health information boxes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using real-world search engine data, this study sought to investigate how users searching for common health-related symptoms with Bing interacted with health information boxes (info boxes) and other page elements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of searches (N=28,552 unique searches) was compiled for the 17 most common medical symptoms queried on Microsoft Bing by users in the United States between September and November 2019. The association between the page elements that users saw, their characteristics, and the time spent on elements or clicks was investigated using linear and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of searches ranged by symptom type from 55 searches for cramps to 7459 searches for anxiety. Users searching for common health-related symptoms saw pages with standard web results (n=24,034, 84%), itemized web results (n=23,354, 82%), ads (n=13,171, 46%), and info boxes (n=18,215, 64%). Users spent on average 22 (SD 26) seconds on the search engine results page. Users who saw all page elements spent 25% (7.1 s) of their time on the info box, 23% (6.1 s) on standard web results, 20% (5.7 s) on ads, and 10% (10 s) on itemized web results, with significantly more time on the info box compared to other elements and the least amount of time on itemized web results. Info box characteristics such as reading ease and appearance of related conditions were associated with longer time on the info box. Although none of the info box characteristics were associated with clicks on standard web results, info box characteristics such as reading ease and related searches were negatively correlated with clicks on ads.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Info boxes were attended most by users compared with other page elements, and their characteristics may influence future web searching. Future studies are needed that further explore the utility of info boxes and their influence on real-world health-seeking behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e37286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987180/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9733177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Factors That Predict Marketing of e-Cigarette Products on Twitter: Infodemiology Approach Using Time Series. 探索Twitter上预测电子烟产品营销的因素:使用时间序列的信息流行病学方法。
Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.2196/37412
Nnamdi C Ezike, Allison Ames Boykin, Page D Dobbs, Huy Mai, Brian A Primack

Background: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (known as electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes) increase risk for adverse health outcomes among naïve tobacco users, particularly youth and young adults. This vulnerable population is also at risk for exposed brand marketing and advertisement of e-cigarettes on social media. Understanding predictors of how e-cigarette manufacturers conduct social media advertising and marketing could benefit public health approaches to addressing e-cigarette use.

Objective: This study documents factors that predict changes in daily frequency of commercial tweets about e-cigarettes using time series modeling techniques.

Methods: We analyzed data on the daily frequency of commercial tweets about e-cigarettes collected between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. We fit the data to an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model and unobserved components model (UCM). Four measures assessed model prediction accuracy. Predictors in the UCM include days with events related to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), non-FDA-related events with significant importance such as academic or news announcements, weekday versus weekend, and the period when JUUL maintained an active Twitter account (ie, actively tweeting from their corporate Twitter account) versus when JUUL stopped tweeting.

Results: When the 2 statistical models were fit to the data, the results indicate that the UCM was the best modeling technique for our data. All 4 predictors included in the UCM were significant predictors of the daily frequency of commercial tweets about e-cigarettes. On average, brand advertisement and marketing of e-cigarettes on Twitter was higher by more than 150 advertisements on days with FDA-related events compared to days without FDA events. Similarly, more than 40 commercial tweets about e-cigarettes were, on average, recorded on days with important non-FDA events compared to days without such events. We also found that there were more commercial tweets about e-cigarettes on weekdays than on weekends and more commercial tweets when JUUL maintained an active Twitter account.

Conclusions: e-Cigarette companies promote their products on Twitter. Commercial tweets were significantly more likely to be posted on days with important FDA announcements, which may alter the narrative about information shared by the FDA. There remains a need for regulation of digital marketing of e-cigarette products in the United States.

背景:电子尼古丁输送系统(称为电子烟或电子烟)增加了naïve烟草使用者,特别是青年和青壮年不良健康结果的风险。这些弱势群体也面临着社交媒体上暴露的品牌营销和电子烟广告的风险。了解电子烟制造商如何进行社交媒体广告和营销的预测因素,有助于解决电子烟使用问题的公共卫生方法。目的:本研究使用时间序列建模技术记录了预测电子烟商业推文每日频率变化的因素。方法:我们分析了2017年1月1日至2020年12月31日收集的关于电子烟的商业推文的每日频率数据。我们将数据拟合到自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)模型和未观测分量模型(UCM)中。四项措施评估模型预测的准确性。UCM中的预测因子包括与美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)相关事件的天数,与非FDA相关的重要事件,如学术或新闻公告,工作日与周末,以及JUUL保持活跃Twitter帐户(即从其公司Twitter帐户积极发推文)与JUUL停止发推文的时间。结果:两种统计模型对数据进行拟合,结果表明UCM是我们数据的最佳建模技术。UCM中包含的所有4个预测因子都是关于电子烟的商业推文每日频率的重要预测因子。平均而言,在有FDA相关活动的日子里,推特上的电子烟品牌广告和营销广告比没有FDA相关活动的日子多150多个。同样,与没有此类事件的日子相比,在有重要非fda事件的日子里,平均记录了40多条关于电子烟的商业推文。我们还发现,在工作日,有关电子烟的商业推文比周末更多,而当JUUL保持活跃的推特账户时,商业推文也更多。结论:电子烟公司在Twitter上推广他们的产品。商业推特更有可能在FDA发布重要公告的日子发布,这可能会改变FDA分享信息的叙述。在美国,仍然需要对电子烟产品的数字营销进行监管。
{"title":"Exploring Factors That Predict Marketing of e-Cigarette Products on Twitter: Infodemiology Approach Using Time Series.","authors":"Nnamdi C Ezike,&nbsp;Allison Ames Boykin,&nbsp;Page D Dobbs,&nbsp;Huy Mai,&nbsp;Brian A Primack","doi":"10.2196/37412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/37412","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic nicotine delivery systems (known as electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes) increase risk for adverse health outcomes among naïve tobacco users, particularly youth and young adults. This vulnerable population is also at risk for exposed brand marketing and advertisement of e-cigarettes on social media. Understanding predictors of how e-cigarette manufacturers conduct social media advertising and marketing could benefit public health approaches to addressing e-cigarette use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study documents factors that predict changes in daily frequency of commercial tweets about e-cigarettes using time series modeling techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data on the daily frequency of commercial tweets about e-cigarettes collected between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. We fit the data to an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model and unobserved components model (UCM). Four measures assessed model prediction accuracy. Predictors in the UCM include days with events related to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), non-FDA-related events with significant importance such as academic or news announcements, weekday versus weekend, and the period when JUUL maintained an active Twitter account (ie, actively tweeting from their corporate Twitter account) versus when JUUL stopped tweeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the 2 statistical models were fit to the data, the results indicate that the UCM was the best modeling technique for our data. All 4 predictors included in the UCM were significant predictors of the daily frequency of commercial tweets about e-cigarettes. On average, brand advertisement and marketing of e-cigarettes on Twitter was higher by more than 150 advertisements on days with FDA-related events compared to days without FDA events. Similarly, more than 40 commercial tweets about e-cigarettes were, on average, recorded on days with important non-FDA events compared to days without such events. We also found that there were more commercial tweets about e-cigarettes on weekdays than on weekends and more commercial tweets when JUUL maintained an active Twitter account.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>e-Cigarette companies promote their products on Twitter. Commercial tweets were significantly more likely to be posted on days with important FDA announcements, which may alter the narrative about information shared by the FDA. There remains a need for regulation of digital marketing of e-cigarette products in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"e37412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9733180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JMIR infodemiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1