Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100189
Seyed Mehdi Mirniam , Alireza Andalib , Maedeh Radandish , Ramin Sami , Nafiseh Esmaeil
Background
T cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a critical role in viral infectious immunity. Exhaustion of T cells during infection and decreased Tregs both contribute to the exacerbation of the disease. In the present study, we assessed T cells and regulatory T cells of COVID-19 patients and a control group according to the expression of the PD-1 molecule.
Methods
Forty-two COVID-19 patients and 40 controls were enrolled in the study. In COVID-19 patients, blood samples were collected on the first day of their hospitalization. Regulatory T cells (CD4+, CD25+, FOXP3+), CD4+PD-1+, and PD-1+ regulatory T cells were assessed by flow cytometry.
Results
The percentage of CD4+PD-1 + T cells in COVID-19 patients was significantly higher compared to the control group (P < 0.0001). The percentage of PD-1+ regulatory T cells was significantly increased in the patient group compared to the control group (P < 0.0001). However, the Treg percentage was significantly decreased in the patient group compared to the control group (P < 0.0001). The frequency of CD4+PD-1 + T cells, Tregs, and PD-1+ Tregs had acceptable sensitivity and specificity for assisting in the diagnosis of severe/critical COVID-19. The declined Tregs and enhanced CD4+CD25+, CD4+PD-1+, and PD-1 + T cells were associated with disease severity.
Conclusion
The decrease in Tregs and the increase in exhaustion of these cells and T cells play an important role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. These immune parameters could be used as meaningful indicators for assisting in the diagnosis of severe/critical COVID-19.
背景T细胞和调节性T细胞(Tregs)在病毒感染免疫中起着至关重要的作用。感染期间T细胞的耗竭和Tregs的减少都会导致疾病恶化。在本研究中,我们根据 PD-1 分子的表达评估了 COVID-19 患者和对照组的 T 细胞和调节性 T 细胞。COVID-19患者在住院第一天采集血液样本。结果与对照组相比,COVID-19 患者 CD4+PD-1 + T 细胞的百分比显著升高(P <0.0001)。与对照组相比,患者组 PD-1+ 调节性 T 细胞的比例明显增加(P <0.0001)。然而,与对照组相比,患者组的 Treg 百分比明显下降(P < 0.0001)。CD4+PD-1 + T细胞、Tregs和PD-1+ Tregs的频率对辅助诊断重度/危重COVID-19具有可接受的敏感性和特异性。Tregs 的减少和 CD4+CD25+、CD4+PD-1+ 和 PD-1 + T 细胞的增加与疾病的严重程度有关。这些免疫参数可作为有意义的指标,协助诊断严重/危重的 COVID-19。
{"title":"Decrease of Tregs cells and increase of exhausted Treg cells as the predictors of COVID19 severity","authors":"Seyed Mehdi Mirniam , Alireza Andalib , Maedeh Radandish , Ramin Sami , Nafiseh Esmaeil","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100189","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100189","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>T cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a critical role in viral infectious immunity. Exhaustion of T cells during infection and decreased Tregs both contribute to the exacerbation of the disease. In the present study, we assessed T cells and regulatory T cells of COVID-19 patients and a control group according to the expression of the PD-1 molecule.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-two COVID-19 patients and 40 controls were enrolled in the study. In COVID-19 patients, blood samples were collected on the first day of their hospitalization. Regulatory T cells (CD4+, CD25+, FOXP3+), CD4+PD-1+, and PD-1+ regulatory T cells were assessed by flow cytometry.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The percentage of CD4+PD-1 + <em>T</em> cells in COVID-19 patients was significantly higher compared to the control group (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). The percentage of PD-1+ regulatory T cells was significantly increased in the patient group compared to the control group (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). However, the Treg percentage was significantly decreased in the patient group compared to the control group (<em>P</em> < 0.0001). The frequency of CD4+PD-1 + <em>T</em> cells, Tregs, and PD-1+ Tregs had acceptable sensitivity and specificity for assisting in the diagnosis of severe/critical COVID-19. The declined Tregs and enhanced CD4+CD25+, CD4+PD-1+, and PD-1 + <em>T</em> cells were associated with disease severity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The decrease in Tregs and the increase in exhaustion of these cells and T cells play an important role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. These immune parameters could be used as meaningful indicators for assisting in the diagnosis of severe/critical COVID-19.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000140/pdfft?md5=1ee8e6941b4c1a8e09bfd15853f7398b&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000140-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141841499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100187
Feifan Li , Weiguo Zhang , Chengfang Chen , Rongjun Man , Huiming Yang , Shudong Yu
Background
The swift global spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory ailment primarily marked by pulmonary symptoms, has been linked to the involvement of various organs, including the intestines, kidneys, throat, and ears. Otitis media with effusion (OME), often succeeding an upper respiratory tract infection, mirrors its incidence. As a respiratory infectious disease, it prompts the query of whether the COVID-19 pandemic has spurred an uptick in OME and whether the COVID-19 virus persists in middle ear effusion (MEE) for an extended period.
Methods
To gauge the incidence of OME in the population during the COVID-19 pandemic, a tailored questionnaire was disseminated and subsequently analyzed. Assessing the rise in OME incidence during the pandemic, we compared the proportion of OME cases in the otology outpatient department between pandemic and non-pandemic periods. Statistical analysis involved a t-test. Simultaneously, MEE was collected from patients with COVID-19-associated OME during the pandemic to ascertain the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in MEE via polymerase chain reaction.
Results
Based on the questionnaire data, the estimated OME incidence in the population is approximately 31.4 %. In contrast to the non-pandemic period, the percentage variation in the OME outpatient proportion was 71.4 % (P < 0.05). Among the 61 MEE samples, 13 polymerase chain reaction results were positive, constituting 21.31 %. Nasopharyngeal swabs yielded negative results. Notably, only one patient experienced OME recurrence after 1 month of auripuncture.
Conclusions
COVID-19 can trigger an escalation in OME cases. Even when nasopharyngeal swabs show negative results, SARS-CoV-2 can endure in MEE for an extended duration, suggesting the potential for asymptomatic COVID-19 transmission and recurrence within the population.
背景2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是一种以肺部症状为主要特征的呼吸道疾病,它在全球的迅速传播与肠道、肾脏、咽喉和耳朵等多个器官的受累有关。中耳炎伴积液(OME)通常继发于上呼吸道感染,这也反映了其发病率。作为一种呼吸道传染病,它引发了这样一个疑问:COVID-19 大流行是否导致中耳积液增多,COVID-19 病毒是否长期存在于中耳积液中?为了评估大流行期间OME发病率的上升情况,我们比较了大流行期间和非大流行期间耳科门诊中OME病例的比例。统计分析采用 t 检验。同时,我们还收集了大流行期间 COVID-19 相关 OME 患者的 MEE,通过聚合酶链反应确定 MEE 中是否存在 SARS-CoV-2 病毒。与非疫情流行时期相比,OME 门诊病人比例的变化幅度为 71.4 %(P < 0.05)。在 61 份 MEE 样本中,13 份聚合酶链反应结果呈阳性,占 21.31%。鼻咽拭子结果为阴性。值得注意的是,只有一名患者在耳穿刺 1 个月后出现 OME 复发。即使鼻咽拭子检测结果为阴性,SARS-CoV-2 仍可在 MEE 中持续很长时间,这表明 COVID-19 有可能在人群中无症状传播和复发。
{"title":"Otitis media with effusion in patients with COVID-19: A single-center study in China","authors":"Feifan Li , Weiguo Zhang , Chengfang Chen , Rongjun Man , Huiming Yang , Shudong Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100187","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100187","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The swift global spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory ailment primarily marked by pulmonary symptoms, has been linked to the involvement of various organs, including the intestines, kidneys, throat, and ears. Otitis media with effusion (OME), often succeeding an upper respiratory tract infection, mirrors its incidence. As a respiratory infectious disease, it prompts the query of whether the COVID-19 pandemic has spurred an uptick in OME and whether the COVID-19 virus persists in middle ear effusion (MEE) for an extended period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To gauge the incidence of OME in the population during the COVID-19 pandemic, a tailored questionnaire was disseminated and subsequently analyzed. Assessing the rise in OME incidence during the pandemic, we compared the proportion of OME cases in the otology outpatient department between pandemic and non-pandemic periods. Statistical analysis involved a <em>t</em>-test. Simultaneously, MEE was collected from patients with COVID-19-associated OME during the pandemic to ascertain the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in MEE via polymerase chain reaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Based on the questionnaire data, the estimated OME incidence in the population is approximately 31.4 %. In contrast to the non-pandemic period, the percentage variation in the OME outpatient proportion was 71.4 % (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Among the 61 MEE samples, 13 polymerase chain reaction results were positive, constituting 21.31 %. Nasopharyngeal swabs yielded negative results. Notably, only one patient experienced OME recurrence after 1 month of auripuncture.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>COVID-19 can trigger an escalation in OME cases. Even when nasopharyngeal swabs show negative results, SARS-CoV-2 can endure in MEE for an extended duration, suggesting the potential for asymptomatic COVID-19 transmission and recurrence within the population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000127/pdfft?md5=a6c22a287e279a8d6ab27dc174027ab8&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000127-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141848063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-04DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100186
Marcarious M. Tantuoyir , Muhammed Camara , Marjan Sohrabi , SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi , Zahra Ahmadinejad
Despite recent efforts to control and eradicate the hepatitis C virus (HCV), Iran still faces significant gaps and challenges in HCV epidemiological data. Accurate prevalence estimates based on comprehensive and up-to-date evidence compilations are critical in eliminating the virus. We used a qualitative approach in summarizing the findings of the included studies. The prevalence of HCV is within the range of 1.26 % (1.02 - 1.56). The introduction of strict screening protocols for blood transfusions has significantly reduced the incidence of transfusion-related HCV transmission in recent years though unsafe injection practices, men who have sex with men (MSM), and injecting drug use are still the primary risk factors for transmission. Studies indicate that the predominant HCV genotype in the country is genotype 1a, closely followed by genotypes 3a and 1b. Population-based studies and comprehensive national HCV surveillance systems are lacking. More efforts are needed to ensure the sustainability of HCV screening and infection control programs in Iran.
{"title":"Hepatitis C virus infection in Iran: A review of current prevalence and preventive strategies from a developing country","authors":"Marcarious M. Tantuoyir , Muhammed Camara , Marjan Sohrabi , SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi , Zahra Ahmadinejad","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100186","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite recent efforts to control and eradicate the hepatitis C virus (HCV), Iran still faces significant gaps and challenges in HCV epidemiological data. Accurate prevalence estimates based on comprehensive and up-to-date evidence compilations are critical in eliminating the virus. We used a qualitative approach in summarizing the findings of the included studies. The prevalence of HCV is within the range of 1.26 % (1.02 - 1.56). The introduction of strict screening protocols for blood transfusions has significantly reduced the incidence of transfusion-related HCV transmission in recent years though unsafe injection practices, men who have sex with men (MSM), and injecting drug use are still the primary risk factors for transmission. Studies indicate that the predominant HCV genotype in the country is genotype 1a, closely followed by genotypes 3a and 1b. Population-based studies and comprehensive national HCV surveillance systems are lacking. More efforts are needed to ensure the sustainability of HCV screening and infection control programs in Iran.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000115/pdfft?md5=f793bc4f9a09752a6b9a94ae4eefe847&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000115-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141606547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a pathogen that causes hepatitis. There are few reports of HEV seroprevalence among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) in Japan. This study aimed to determine the HEV seroprevalence among PWH at our hospital. Anti-HEV IgG was tested for using enzyme immunoassays and immunoblot assays. Clinical information was obtained from medical records and additional patient questionnaires. Sixty-eight PWH were included in this study. Four patients (5.9 %) showed HEV IgG seropositivity with both methods, while one patient (1.5 %) was seropositive using only the immunoblot assay, and three patients (4.4 %) were seropositive using only the enzyme immunoassay. There was a significant difference in age between anti-HEV IgG-seropositive and -negative individuals (median, 57.5 and 48.0 years, respectively; p = 0.012). There were no significant differences in the other clinical characteristics. Our results revealed that age is a risk factor for HEV infection among PWH.
戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)是一种导致肝炎的病原体。在日本,有关人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者(PWH)中 HEV 血清流行率的报道很少。本研究旨在确定本医院 PWH 患者的 HEV 血清流行率。采用酶联免疫测定法和免疫印迹法检测抗 HEV IgG。临床信息来自病历和附加的患者问卷。本研究共纳入 68 名 PWH 患者。四名患者(5.9%)两种方法均显示 HEV IgG 血清阳性,一名患者(1.5%)仅使用免疫印迹检测法显示血清阳性,三名患者(4.4%)仅使用酶免疫测定法显示血清阳性。抗-HEV IgG 血清学阳性和阴性患者的年龄有明显差异(中位数分别为 57.5 岁和 48.0 岁;P = 0.012)。其他临床特征无明显差异。我们的研究结果表明,年龄是威尔士人感染 HEV 的一个风险因素。
{"title":"Hepatitis E virus seroprevalence in patients with human immunodeficiency virus: A single-center study in Japan","authors":"Yoshitaka Wakabayashi , Satoshi Kitaura , Koh Okamoto , Mahoko Ikeda , Shintaro Yanagimoto , Shu Okugawa , Kyoji Moriya","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100185","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100185","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a pathogen that causes hepatitis. There are few reports of HEV seroprevalence among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) in Japan. This study aimed to determine the HEV seroprevalence among PWH at our hospital. Anti-HEV IgG was tested for using enzyme immunoassays and immunoblot assays. Clinical information was obtained from medical records and additional patient questionnaires. Sixty-eight PWH were included in this study. Four patients (5.9 %) showed HEV IgG seropositivity with both methods, while one patient (1.5 %) was seropositive using only the immunoblot assay, and three patients (4.4 %) were seropositive using only the enzyme immunoassay. There was a significant difference in age between anti-HEV IgG-seropositive and -negative individuals (median, 57.5 and 48.0 years, respectively; <em>p</em> = 0.012). There were no significant differences in the other clinical characteristics. Our results revealed that age is a risk factor for HEV infection among PWH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000103/pdfft?md5=172cdf96f56efbfdf4452bee471c978c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000103-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141276776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100184
Karsten Keller , Oliver Friedrich , Julia Treiber , Anne Quermann , Birgit Friedmann-Bette
Background
Most children are afflicted by a mild SARS-CoV-2-infection course in comparison to adults. However, data about differences between the experienced symptoms of pediatric/adolescent in comparison to adult athletes are sparse.
Methods
Competitive athletes of any age, who presented for preparticipation screening 04/2020–10/2021 with confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection were included in this study, stratified for pediatric/adolescent (≤18years) or adult age (>18years) and both age-groups were compared regarding symptoms.
Results
Overall, 157 athletes with former SARS-CoV-2-infection (mean age 22.0 [18.0/27.0] years; 35.0 % females) were included in our study 04/2020 – 10/2021; among them, 40 (25.5 %) were pediatric/adolescent and 117 (74.5 %) adult athletes.
Pediatric/adolescent athletes had significantly more often an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infection (22.5% vs. 6.0 %, P = 0.003). Symptoms of cold and flu-like symptoms (81.2% vs. 57.5 %, P = 0.003) and neurological symptoms (83.8% vs. 60.0 %, P = 0.002) were more often detected in adult athletes, while respiratory and cardiac symptoms were similar prevalent in both groups.
Age ≤ 18 years was independently associated with higher prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infection (OR 5.12 [95 %CI 1.71–15.33], P = 0.004), but reduced occurrence of cold and flu-like symptoms (OR 0.27 [95 %CI 0.12–0.62], P = 0.002) and of neurological symptoms (OR 0.29 [95 %CI 0.13–0.67], P = 0.003). The included athletes were very rarely affected by adverse events. Pneumonia was detected in one adult athlete (0.9% vs. 0 %). None of the included athletes were afflicted by myocarditis or other serious adverse events.
Conclusions
Pediatric/adolescent athletes had more often an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infection or were afflicted by only mild symptoms, while adult athletes suffered from larger symptom-burden predominantly driven by neurologic symptoms.
{"title":"Differences regarding symptoms of SARS-CoV-2-Infection in pediatric and adolescent athletes in comparison to adult athletes","authors":"Karsten Keller , Oliver Friedrich , Julia Treiber , Anne Quermann , Birgit Friedmann-Bette","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100184","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100184","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Most children are afflicted by a mild SARS-CoV-2-infection course in comparison to adults. However, data about differences between the experienced symptoms of pediatric/adolescent in comparison to adult athletes are sparse.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Competitive athletes of any age, who presented for preparticipation screening 04/2020–10/2021 with confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection were included in this study, stratified for pediatric/adolescent (≤18years) or adult age (>18years) and both age-groups were compared regarding symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 157 athletes with former SARS-CoV-2-infection (mean age 22.0 [18.0/27.0] years; 35.0 % females) were included in our study 04/2020 – 10/2021; among them, 40 (25.5 %) were pediatric/adolescent and 117 (74.5 %) adult athletes.</p><p>Pediatric/adolescent athletes had significantly more often an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infection (22.5% vs. 6.0 %, <em>P</em> = 0.003). Symptoms of cold and flu-like symptoms (81.2% vs. 57.5 %, <em>P</em> = 0.003) and neurological symptoms (83.8% vs. 60.0 %, <em>P</em> = 0.002) were more often detected in adult athletes, while respiratory and cardiac symptoms were similar prevalent in both groups.</p><p>Age ≤ 18 years was independently associated with higher prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infection (OR 5.12 [95 %CI 1.71–15.33], <em>P</em> = 0.004), but reduced occurrence of cold and flu-like symptoms (OR 0.27 [95 %CI 0.12–0.62], <em>P</em> = 0.002) and of neurological symptoms (OR 0.29 [95 %CI 0.13–0.67], <em>P</em> = 0.003). The included athletes were very rarely affected by adverse events. Pneumonia was detected in one adult athlete (0.9% vs. 0 %). None of the included athletes were afflicted by myocarditis or other serious adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pediatric/adolescent athletes had more often an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infection or were afflicted by only mild symptoms, while adult athletes suffered from larger symptom-burden predominantly driven by neurologic symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000097/pdfft?md5=da70512fa7fcde4ddad3bff5f86c670b&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000097-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141056449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-10DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100183
Jasmin Shrestha , Sanjaya K Shrestha , Carl Mason , Siriporn Sornsakrin , Sasikorn Silapong , Jwoti Dhakwa , Shanti Regmi , Tor A. Strand , Ashild K. Andreassen , Susanne Dudman , Ladaporn Bodhidatta
Background
Globally, rotavirus A (RV) is a leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in young children under 5 years. The main aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of RV in children with and without diarrhea whose age ranged from 3 months to 5 years from two different hospitals of Nepal. We also described the diversity of rotavirus circulating during the pre-vaccination period in Nepal between 2006–2009.
Materials and methods
A total of 2400 stool samples collected from children's years with diarrhea (cases, N = 1200) and without diarrhea (controls, N = 1200) were tested for the presence of RV by both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All samples positive for RT PCR and/or ELISA were further characterized for G and P genotypes by conventional RT-PCR.
Results
In total, 500 of the 2398 (20.8 %) samples (424 cases and 76 controls), were positive for RV. The most frequently detected G-types were G12, G1, and G9 and P-types were P[8] and P[6]. The predominant genotypes G12P[6], G12P[8], G1P[8] and G9P[8] were identified in 27.8 %, 24.2 %, 11.8 % and 10.8 % of the samples, respectively.
Conclusion
This study observed high prevalence of G12P[6] rotavirus circulating in Nepal before vaccine introduction and they may pose an emerging challenge to current and future vaccine. Therefore, continuous molecular surveillance of circulating genotypes and emerging rotavirus strain should be carried out to better understand the effectiveness of vaccination program.
{"title":"Rotavirus strains in children less than 5 years of age: A case control study","authors":"Jasmin Shrestha , Sanjaya K Shrestha , Carl Mason , Siriporn Sornsakrin , Sasikorn Silapong , Jwoti Dhakwa , Shanti Regmi , Tor A. Strand , Ashild K. Andreassen , Susanne Dudman , Ladaporn Bodhidatta","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100183","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100183","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Globally, rotavirus A (RV) is a leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in young children under 5 years. The main aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of RV in children with and without diarrhea whose age ranged from 3 months to 5 years from two different hospitals of Nepal. We also described the diversity of rotavirus circulating during the pre-vaccination period in Nepal between 2006–2009.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 2400 stool samples collected from children's years with diarrhea (cases, <em>N</em> = 1200) and without diarrhea (controls, <em>N</em> = 1200) were tested for the presence of RV by both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All samples positive for RT PCR and/or ELISA were further characterized for G and P genotypes by conventional RT-PCR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 500 of the 2398 (20.8 %) samples (424 cases and 76 controls), were positive for RV. The most frequently detected G-types were G12, G1, and G9 and P-types were P[8] and P[6]. The predominant genotypes G12P[6], G12P[8], G1P[8] and G9P[8] were identified in 27.8 %, 24.2 %, 11.8 % and 10.8 % of the samples, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study observed high prevalence of G12P[6] rotavirus circulating in Nepal before vaccine introduction and they may pose an emerging challenge to current and future vaccine. Therefore, continuous molecular surveillance of circulating genotypes and emerging rotavirus strain should be carried out to better understand the effectiveness of vaccination program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000085/pdfft?md5=5c8f236d1aeab98908db98d8dfa55b1f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000085-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141031857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100182
Le Van Nam , Hoang Xuan Son , Le Van Nguyen Bang , Le Van Duyet
Background/purpose
HPV infection is the primary cause of cervical cancer, and genotype distribution varies according to geographical location and carcinogenicity. Therefore, identifying HPV genotype and its association with cervical cancer features is critical for screening, diagnosis, and therapy.
Methods
Data from Vietnamese women with HPV-positive cervical cancer were collected from the northern region. The HPV genotype was identified using the Cobas®®4800 HPV system, whereas the nucleotide sequences of the E6, E7, and L1 genes were used to identify lineages and sublineages using DNASTAR, Bioedit, ATGC 7.2, and MEGA 11.0.10 softwares.
Results
Of the 180 patients infected with HPV, 82.8 % revealed single infections, and 17.2 % showed multiple infections. HPV16 (64.4 %), HPV18 (28.9 %), and other HPVs (6.7 %) were the most prevalent HPV genotypes. HPV16 lineages included European (sublineage A1 (11.2 %), A2 (1.72 %), and A3 (25.86 %); Asian (sublineage A4 (53.85 %); African-American (sublineage D1 (5.17 %); and Asian-American (sublineage D3 (2.59 %). The HPV18 lineage includes Asian-Ameridian (sublineages A1 (100 %)). HPV18 revealed a higher rate of cervical cancer, cervicitis, warts, and ulcers than HPV16 and other high-risk genotypes in the 35–54–year–old group, but did not show a difference in cancer stages.
Conclusions
HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes are common in cervical cancer in northern Vietnam, with European, Asian, and Asian–Amerindian lineages predominating. HPV18 causes cervical cancer at a higher rate than other genotypes in the 35–54–year–old age group; thus, early identification of the genotype is critical for more successful therapy.
{"title":"HPV prevalence and genotype distribution among Vietnamese cervical cancer patients in the northern region of Vietnam, from 2018 – 2020","authors":"Le Van Nam , Hoang Xuan Son , Le Van Nguyen Bang , Le Van Duyet","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100182","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/purpose</h3><p>HPV infection is the primary cause of cervical cancer, and genotype distribution varies according to geographical location and carcinogenicity. Therefore, identifying HPV genotype and its association with cervical cancer features is critical for screening, diagnosis, and therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from Vietnamese women with HPV-positive cervical cancer were collected from the northern region. The HPV genotype was identified using the Cobas<sup>®®</sup>4800 HPV system, whereas the nucleotide sequences of the E6, E7, and L1 genes were used to identify lineages and sublineages using DNASTAR, Bioedit, ATGC 7.2, and MEGA 11.0.10 softwares.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 180 patients infected with HPV, 82.8 % revealed single infections, and 17.2 % showed multiple infections. HPV16 (64.4 %), HPV18 (28.9 %), and other HPVs (6.7 %) were the most prevalent HPV genotypes. HPV16 lineages included European (sublineage A1 (11.2 %), A2 (1.72 %), and A3 (25.86 %); Asian (sublineage A4 (53.85 %); African-American (sublineage D1 (5.17 %); and Asian-American (sublineage D3 (2.59 %). The HPV18 lineage includes Asian-Ameridian (sublineages A1 (100 %)). HPV18 revealed a higher rate of cervical cancer, cervicitis, warts, and ulcers than HPV16 and other high-risk genotypes in the 35–54–year–old group, but did not show a difference in cancer stages.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes are common in cervical cancer in northern Vietnam, with European, Asian, and Asian–Amerindian lineages predominating. HPV18 causes cervical cancer at a higher rate than other genotypes in the 35–54–year–old age group; thus, early identification of the genotype is critical for more successful therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000073/pdfft?md5=1018b5cd7ed013d02bb7bc73e5df9546&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000073-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140906183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Very limited literature on the clinical course of COVID-19 among liver transplant recipients (LT) is available from India. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and mutational profile of SARS-CoV-2 among LT.
Methodology
This was a retrospective study including LT cases in whom SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing was requested between April 2020 and December 2022. Detailed mutational analysis was performed by comparing LT COVID-19 positive study group i.e. LT-CoV(+) with two control groups. One including COVID-19 positive with underlying chronic liver disease (CLD) i.e. CLD-CoV(+) and other including COVID-19 positive outpatients without any underlying LD i.e. NLD-CoV(+)
Results
Among 213 cases, 48 (22.5 %) were positive [LT-CoV(+)] and the remaining 165 (77.5 %) were negative [LT-CoV(-)] for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 % had mild, 14 % moderate and 37 % had severe COVID-19. Mortality was recorded in 11 (23 %) cases, the majority being non-vaccinated. Severe COVID-19 with intensive care requirement was significantly higher among recipients with >5 years since transplant compared to recipients with ≤5 years (p = 0.02). Among 40 samples subjected to whole genome sequencing, 19 (47.5 %) were Delta, 15 (37.5 %) Omicron, and 6 (15 %) were other variants. COVID-19 severity was significantly higher in LT-CoV(+/D) with no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.122). No significant differences in mutational load and in fraction of deleterious mutations were observed between LT-/CLD-/NLD-CoV(+) groups for either Delta or Omicron.
Conclusion
An overall fatality rate of 23 % was recorded among LT recipients. Longer duration since transplant was associated with severe clinical course. However, no significant difference in mutation load between studied groups was observed.
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 among liver transplant recipients: Clinical course and mutational analysis","authors":"Ruchita Chhabra , Reshu Agarwal , Pramod Gautam , Varun Suroliya , Shalini Thappar , Shastry SM , Arvind Tomar , Chhagan Bihari , Pratibha Kale , Viniyendra Pamecha , Ekta Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100181","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Very limited literature on the clinical course of COVID-19 among liver transplant recipients (LT) is available from India. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and mutational profile of SARS-CoV-2 among LT.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>This was a retrospective study including LT cases in whom SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing was requested between April 2020 and December 2022. Detailed mutational analysis was performed by comparing LT COVID-19 positive study group i.e. LT-CoV(+) with two control groups. One including COVID-19 positive with underlying chronic liver disease (CLD) i.e. CLD-CoV(+) and other including COVID-19 positive outpatients without any underlying LD i.e. NLD-CoV(+)</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 213 cases, 48 (22.5 %) were positive [LT-CoV(+)] and the remaining 165 (77.5 %) were negative [LT-CoV(-)] for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 % had mild, 14 % moderate and 37 % had severe COVID-19. Mortality was recorded in 11 (23 %) cases, the majority being non-vaccinated. Severe COVID-19 with intensive care requirement was significantly higher among recipients with >5 years since transplant compared to recipients with <strong>≤</strong>5 years (<em>p</em> = 0.02). Among 40 samples subjected to whole genome sequencing, 19 (47.5 %) were Delta, 15 (37.5 %) Omicron, and 6 (15 %) were other variants. COVID-19 severity was significantly higher in LT-CoV(+/D) with no significant difference in mortality (<em>p</em> = 0.122). No significant differences in mutational load and in fraction of deleterious mutations were observed between LT-/CLD-/NLD-CoV(+) groups for either Delta or Omicron.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An overall fatality rate of 23 % was recorded among LT recipients. Longer duration since transplant was associated with severe clinical course. However, no significant difference in mutation load between studied groups was observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000061/pdfft?md5=a4e9971e0b0b2f0abc2d9d0fb093443b&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000061-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141083785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100180
Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi , Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha , Saba Ilkhani , Hamidreza Hatamabadi , Amir Sadeghi , Seyed Amir Ahmad Safavi-Naini , Kamran Heidari , Nazanin Taraghikhah , Mohammad Mahdi Fallah , Reyhaneh Kalantar , Nariman Naderi , Romina Esbati , Nastaran Ebrahimi , Ali Solhpour , Tannaz Jamialahmadi , Amirhossein Sahebkar
Background
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of remdesivir, alone or in combination with corticosteroids, on the time to death in COVID-19 patients.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was conducted between March 20, 2020, and March 18, 2021, on 5318 patients with confirmed COVID-19 at three tertiary educational hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The treated group consisted of COVID-19 patients who received remdesivir, either alone or in combination with corticosteroids, while the untreated group included infected patients who did not receive these treatments. The two groups were matched by propensity score matching method, which adjusted for 92 confounding factors such as demographic, sign and symptom, clinical, and treatment-related factors, to provide balanced covariates between the treated and untreated groups.
Results
Of the 4,322 patients, 791 received remdesivir alone and 694 received remdesivir combined with corticosteroids. Among the patients who received remdesivir, 456 were male, and the mean (±standard deviation) age was 59.52±16.49 with a median hospitalization stay of 8 (interquartile range: 5–13) days. After applying the nearest neighbor propensity score matching method, there were no significant differences found in the hazard of death between patients who received remdesivir alone and those who did not receive treatment (hazard ratio: 0.94; 95 % confidence interval: 0.76, 1.16). In addition, the combination of remdesivir and corticosteroids was not associated with a reduced hazard of death (hazard ratio: 1.00; 95 % confidence interval: 0.80, 1.26). The median hospitalization stay was significantly longer in the group treated with remdesivir (alone/combined with corticosteroids) compared to the untreated group, both before and after matching.
Conclusion
No association was observed between remdesivir treatment (alone/combined with corticosteroids) and a reduced hazard of death among COVID-19 patients. However, longer hospitalization stays were observed in patients receiving remdesivir, either alone or in combination with corticosteroids, compared to the untreated group.
{"title":"Assessing the effect of remdesivir alone and in combination with corticosteroids on time to death in COVID-19: A propensity score-matched analysis","authors":"Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi , Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha , Saba Ilkhani , Hamidreza Hatamabadi , Amir Sadeghi , Seyed Amir Ahmad Safavi-Naini , Kamran Heidari , Nazanin Taraghikhah , Mohammad Mahdi Fallah , Reyhaneh Kalantar , Nariman Naderi , Romina Esbati , Nastaran Ebrahimi , Ali Solhpour , Tannaz Jamialahmadi , Amirhossein Sahebkar","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100180","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100180","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of remdesivir, alone or in combination with corticosteroids, on the time to death in COVID-19 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study was conducted between March 20, 2020, and March 18, 2021, on 5318 patients with confirmed COVID-19 at three tertiary educational hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The treated group consisted of COVID-19 patients who received remdesivir, either alone or in combination with corticosteroids, while the untreated group included infected patients who did not receive these treatments. The two groups were matched by propensity score matching method, which adjusted for 92 confounding factors such as demographic, sign and symptom, clinical, and treatment-related factors, to provide balanced covariates between the treated and untreated groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 4,322 patients, 791 received remdesivir alone and 694 received remdesivir combined with corticosteroids. Among the patients who received remdesivir, 456 were male, and the mean (±standard deviation) age was 59.52±16.49 with a median hospitalization stay of 8 (interquartile range: 5–13) days. After applying the nearest neighbor propensity score matching method, there were no significant differences found in the hazard of death between patients who received remdesivir alone and those who did not receive treatment (hazard ratio: 0.94; 95 % confidence interval: 0.76, 1.16). In addition, the combination of remdesivir and corticosteroids was not associated with a reduced hazard of death (hazard ratio: 1.00; 95 % confidence interval: 0.80, 1.26). The median hospitalization stay was significantly longer in the group treated with remdesivir (alone/combined with corticosteroids) compared to the untreated group, both before and after matching.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No association was observed between remdesivir treatment (alone/combined with corticosteroids) and a reduced hazard of death among COVID-19 patients. However, longer hospitalization stays were observed in patients receiving remdesivir, either alone or in combination with corticosteroids, compared to the untreated group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266703802400005X/pdfft?md5=cc0ab6353901d2e6d1acdc7dc519bd30&pid=1-s2.0-S266703802400005X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140765061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-10DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100179
Jie Yuan , Shuhua An , Zhongfu Zhang
Objective
To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous peramivir compared to oral oseltamivir for pediatric influenza by a method of meta-analysis.
Methods
Clinical trials involving intravenous peramivir versus oral oseltamivir therapy in children with influenza were searched from six databases until July 2023. Data were processed using Stata 15.0 software.
Results
Seven published articles were identified in this review. The combined results exhibited that the clinical effective rate in the peramivir group (76.09 %) was higher than that in the oseltamivir group (58.85 %) (RR= 1.12, 95 %CI: 1.01∼1.24, P = 0.038). The incidence of adverse reactions in the peramivir group (13.31 %) was lower than that in the oseltamivir group (17.34 %) (RR= 0.77, 95 %CI: 0.61–0.96, P = 0.023). Compared with the oseltamivir group, the peramivir group had lower recovery time of body temperature (WMD= -19.81, 95 %CI: -27.58∼-12.04, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Compared with oral oseltamivir, intravenous peramivir has better efficacy and higher safety for pediatric influenza.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of intravenous peramivir versus oral oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza in children: A meta-analysis","authors":"Jie Yuan , Shuhua An , Zhongfu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100179","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100179","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous peramivir compared to oral oseltamivir for pediatric influenza by a method of meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Clinical trials involving intravenous peramivir versus oral oseltamivir therapy in children with influenza were searched from six databases until July 2023. Data were processed using Stata 15.0 software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven published articles were identified in this review. The combined results exhibited that the clinical effective rate in the peramivir group (76.09 %) was higher than that in the oseltamivir group (58.85 %) (RR= 1.12, 95 %CI: 1.01∼1.24, <em>P</em> = 0.038). The incidence of adverse reactions in the peramivir group (13.31 %) was lower than that in the oseltamivir group (17.34 %) (RR= 0.77, 95 %CI: 0.61–0.96, <em>P</em> = 0.023). Compared with the oseltamivir group, the peramivir group had lower recovery time of body temperature (WMD= -19.81, 95 %CI: -27.58∼-12.04, <em>P</em> < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Compared with oral oseltamivir, intravenous peramivir has better efficacy and higher safety for pediatric influenza.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000048/pdfft?md5=3e38732d6d7310f107900a33973c9f81&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000048-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140775921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}