Audrey A Keleman, Melody Li, Julie K Wisch, Rebecca M Bollinger, Melissa J Krauss, Elizabeth A Grant, Tammie L S Benzinger, Beau M Ances, John C Morris, Susan L Stark
Introduction: In preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyloid accumulates in the brain while individuals remain cognitively unimpaired (Clinical Dementia Rating® [CDR] = 0). Differentiating trajectories of healthy aging and preclinical AD is challenging as both are associated with age-related impairments (e.g., falls).
Methods: Longitudinal cohort study. We monitored falls for 1 year among 125 CDR 0 older adults and assessed preclinical AD status (amyloid). We continued to evaluate CDR annually (median 10 years). The cohort was grouped: Preclinical AD-Fall-, Preclinical AD-Fall+, Preclinical AD+Fall-, and Preclinical AD+Fall+. Survival analysis examined time to progression to CDR 1 (mild dementia) by group.
Results: Participants were 74 years (mean) at baseline, 62% female, 96% White. Preclinical AD+Fall+ progressed to CDR 1 most rapidly. Preclinical AD-Fall- progressed least quickly. Preclinical AD+Fall- and Preclinical AD-Fall+ had similar progression rates.
Discussion: Falls may associate with faster progression of AD dementia, potentially reflecting motor and gait dysfunction intrinsic to disease progression.
{"title":"Falls predict faster progression to Alzheimer's dementia.","authors":"Audrey A Keleman, Melody Li, Julie K Wisch, Rebecca M Bollinger, Melissa J Krauss, Elizabeth A Grant, Tammie L S Benzinger, Beau M Ances, John C Morris, Susan L Stark","doi":"10.1002/alz.71177","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyloid accumulates in the brain while individuals remain cognitively unimpaired (Clinical Dementia Rating<sup>®</sup> [CDR] = 0). Differentiating trajectories of healthy aging and preclinical AD is challenging as both are associated with age-related impairments (e.g., falls).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study. We monitored falls for 1 year among 125 CDR 0 older adults and assessed preclinical AD status (amyloid). We continued to evaluate CDR annually (median 10 years). The cohort was grouped: Preclinical AD-Fall-, Preclinical AD-Fall+, Preclinical AD+Fall-, and Preclinical AD+Fall+. Survival analysis examined time to progression to CDR 1 (mild dementia) by group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 74 years (mean) at baseline, 62% female, 96% White. Preclinical AD+Fall+ progressed to CDR 1 most rapidly. Preclinical AD-Fall- progressed least quickly. Preclinical AD+Fall- and Preclinical AD-Fall+ had similar progression rates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Falls may associate with faster progression of AD dementia, potentially reflecting motor and gait dysfunction intrinsic to disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 2","pages":"e71177"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12882545/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146130955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pieter J van der Veere, Argonde C van Harten, Ingrid S van Maurik, Charlotte E Teunissen, Frederik Barkhof, Stephanie J B Vos, Lutz Froelich, Johannes Kornhuber, Jens Wiltfang, Wolfgang Maier, Oliver Peters, Eckart Rüther, Giovanni B Frisoni, Luiza Spiru, Yvonne Freund-Levi, Åsa K Wallin, Harald Hampel, Magda Tsolaki, Iwona Kłoszewska, Patrizia Mecocci, Bruno Vellas, Simon Lovestone, Samantha Galluzzi, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka, Isabel Santana, I Baldeiras, Alexandre de Mendonca, Dina Silva, Gael Chetelat, Géraldine Poisnel, Pieter Jelle Visser, Sterling C Johnson, Erik Stormrud, Oskar Hansson, Sebastian Palmqvist, Gerard Piñol-Ripoll, Johannes Berkhof, Wiesje M van der Flier
Introduction: Automated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker assays have largely replaced manual immunoassays for measuring amyloid pathology in CSF. We refitted and validated the ABIDE model, predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia, with CSF measurements from the automated Elecsys platform.
Methods: We included 2413 MCI participants (998 [41%] amyloid-positive) from seven observational cohorts. Elecsys was used in 958 (40%) participants. The parameters of the previous ABIDE Cox model were re-estimated. Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated with leave-one-cohort-out cross-validation.
Results: During follow-up, 1034 (42%; 585 [58%] amyloid-positive) participants developed dementia. Discrimination was good with Harrell's C of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.73). Calibration was good in the total population and amyloid-positive subgroup, with substantial predicted progression risks for all amyloid-positive participants.
Discussion: We refitted the ABIDE model, predicting MCI to dementia progression, with automated CSF measurements. The model was well calibrated in amyloid-positive patients and may support clinical discussions regarding ATTs.
{"title":"Revising the ABIDE MCI to dementia prediction model for automated cerebrospinal fluid assays.","authors":"Pieter J van der Veere, Argonde C van Harten, Ingrid S van Maurik, Charlotte E Teunissen, Frederik Barkhof, Stephanie J B Vos, Lutz Froelich, Johannes Kornhuber, Jens Wiltfang, Wolfgang Maier, Oliver Peters, Eckart Rüther, Giovanni B Frisoni, Luiza Spiru, Yvonne Freund-Levi, Åsa K Wallin, Harald Hampel, Magda Tsolaki, Iwona Kłoszewska, Patrizia Mecocci, Bruno Vellas, Simon Lovestone, Samantha Galluzzi, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka, Isabel Santana, I Baldeiras, Alexandre de Mendonca, Dina Silva, Gael Chetelat, Géraldine Poisnel, Pieter Jelle Visser, Sterling C Johnson, Erik Stormrud, Oskar Hansson, Sebastian Palmqvist, Gerard Piñol-Ripoll, Johannes Berkhof, Wiesje M van der Flier","doi":"10.1002/alz.71192","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Automated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker assays have largely replaced manual immunoassays for measuring amyloid pathology in CSF. We refitted and validated the ABIDE model, predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia, with CSF measurements from the automated Elecsys platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 2413 MCI participants (998 [41%] amyloid-positive) from seven observational cohorts. Elecsys was used in 958 (40%) participants. The parameters of the previous ABIDE Cox model were re-estimated. Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated with leave-one-cohort-out cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up, 1034 (42%; 585 [58%] amyloid-positive) participants developed dementia. Discrimination was good with Harrell's C of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.73). Calibration was good in the total population and amyloid-positive subgroup, with substantial predicted progression risks for all amyloid-positive participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We refitted the ABIDE model, predicting MCI to dementia progression, with automated CSF measurements. The model was well calibrated in amyloid-positive patients and may support clinical discussions regarding ATTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 2","pages":"e71192"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12884196/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146140653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Han-Kyeol Kim, Jae Hoon Lee, Joong-Hyun Chun, You Jin Kim, Mina Park, Tim West, Kristopher M Kirmess, Philip B Verghese, Daniel Connell, Joel B Braunstein, Young Hoon Ryu, Hanna Cho, Chul Hyoung Lyoo
Introduction: While positron emission tomography (PET) is the standard for pathological staging, its limited availability necessitates accessible alternatives. We evaluated plasma biomarkers for detecting PET-based stages using single-axis (Thal/Braak) and integrated A/T composite models.
Methods: We enrolled 237 AD spectrum participants undergoing multimodal assessments including amyloid/tau PET and plasma biomarker analysis (phosphorylated tau [p-tau] 217, %p-tau217, and amyloid beta [Aβ] 42/40 ratio). Detecting and discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and probability-based stage prediction.
Results: Plasma p-tau217-based biomarkers showed excellent detecting performance for early amyloid (Thal I-II; area under the curve values > 0.96) and intermediate tau (Braak III-IV; area under the curve values > 0.92). Probability-based prediction identified therapeutic window thresholds of 1.895-5.077 pg/mL. Notably, integrated A/T composite staging yielded highly consistent thresholds (< 3% variance).
Discussion: Plasma p-tau217-based biomarkers accurately reflect PET-based staging across frameworks. The convergent therapeutic window thresholds demonstrate robust biological transitions, enabling accessible identification of optimal candidates for disease-modifying therapies.
{"title":"Plasma p-tau217 predicts PET-based pathological staging for precision Alzheimer disease assessment.","authors":"Han-Kyeol Kim, Jae Hoon Lee, Joong-Hyun Chun, You Jin Kim, Mina Park, Tim West, Kristopher M Kirmess, Philip B Verghese, Daniel Connell, Joel B Braunstein, Young Hoon Ryu, Hanna Cho, Chul Hyoung Lyoo","doi":"10.1002/alz.71199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While positron emission tomography (PET) is the standard for pathological staging, its limited availability necessitates accessible alternatives. We evaluated plasma biomarkers for detecting PET-based stages using single-axis (Thal/Braak) and integrated A/T composite models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 237 AD spectrum participants undergoing multimodal assessments including amyloid/tau PET and plasma biomarker analysis (phosphorylated tau [p-tau] 217, %p-tau217, and amyloid beta [Aβ] 42/40 ratio). Detecting and discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and probability-based stage prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Plasma p-tau217-based biomarkers showed excellent detecting performance for early amyloid (Thal I-II; area under the curve values > 0.96) and intermediate tau (Braak III-IV; area under the curve values > 0.92). Probability-based prediction identified therapeutic window thresholds of 1.895-5.077 pg/mL. Notably, integrated A/T composite staging yielded highly consistent thresholds (< 3% variance).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Plasma p-tau217-based biomarkers accurately reflect PET-based staging across frameworks. The convergent therapeutic window thresholds demonstrate robust biological transitions, enabling accessible identification of optimal candidates for disease-modifying therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 2","pages":"e71199"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146206702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: This paper presents the development of a framework to assess the use and experiences of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) supporting sleep, including technological and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) measures. Sleep disturbances are common in people with dementia (PwD) and increase caregiver burden. Pharmacological treatments pose risks, highlighting the need for effective NPIs.
Methods: The framework was designed through literature review and expert consensus, and piloted over three weeks with two community-dwelling PwD and one caregiver.
Results: Findings were analyzed to improve the framework on explanation of NPIs, questionnaires, and sleep monitoring. The framework integrates methods to assess user experiences and to monitor sleep and IEQ parameters, due to their impact on sleep.
Discussion: The final framework, DESMEE-CAP, has demonstrated validity and utility in capturing experiences without disrupting routines. While promising, the small sample size limits generalizability.
Highlights: Development of a framework, in co-creation, that supports research on the use of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) for sleep support for community-living people with dementia and their caregivers. Attention to sleep quality and appropriate support is needed, and insights are provided through the use of the developed framework. Contribution to the development of appropriate, non-pharmacological support for sleep of people with dementia and their caregivers at home.
{"title":"Developing a structured framework to explore the experiences of people with dementia and their caregivers regarding non-pharmacological sleep interventions.","authors":"Cam Huisman, Mglc Loomans, Hsm Kort","doi":"10.1002/alz.71081","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper presents the development of a framework to assess the use and experiences of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) supporting sleep, including technological and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) measures. Sleep disturbances are common in people with dementia (PwD) and increase caregiver burden. Pharmacological treatments pose risks, highlighting the need for effective NPIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The framework was designed through literature review and expert consensus, and piloted over three weeks with two community-dwelling PwD and one caregiver.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings were analyzed to improve the framework on explanation of NPIs, questionnaires, and sleep monitoring. The framework integrates methods to assess user experiences and to monitor sleep and IEQ parameters, due to their impact on sleep.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The final framework, DESMEE-CAP, has demonstrated validity and utility in capturing experiences without disrupting routines. While promising, the small sample size limits generalizability.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Development of a framework, in co-creation, that supports research on the use of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) for sleep support for community-living people with dementia and their caregivers. Attention to sleep quality and appropriate support is needed, and insights are provided through the use of the developed framework. Contribution to the development of appropriate, non-pharmacological support for sleep of people with dementia and their caregivers at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 2","pages":"e71081"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12882557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146130919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kaoru Inoue, Mitsunobu Kono, Ryuji Kobayashi, Chiyomi Yatsu, Daryl Patrick Gamboa Yao, Takanori Shibata, Joseph F Coughlin, Masahiro Shigeta
Introduction: PARO, a baby seal robot, has shown promise in addressing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in clinical settings. However, little is known about PARO's benefits when used independently of health professionals. This study examined that scenario in older adults with dementia.
Methods: Applying a cluster-randomized design, we randomly assigned six facilities to once- or thrice-weekly self-directed PARO sessions for a month. BPSD severity and caregiver burden scores of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Brief Questionnaire were measured.
Results: Findings from 85 participants indicated a significant reduction in caregiver burden in the thrice-weekly group (least-squares [LS] mean: -3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-6.26, -0.32], p = 0.030). For BPSD severity, while clinically meaningful improvement was observed, no significant difference was found (adjusted LS mean: -1.98, 95% CI: [-4.10, 0.15], p = 0.068) due to insufficient statistical power.
Discussion: Increasing robot use frequency reduced the caregiver burden and demonstrated a clinically significant improvement trend in the BPSD severity.
简介:小海豹机器人PARO在临床环境中显示出解决痴呆(BPSD)行为和心理症状的希望。然而,人们对PARO在独立于卫生专业人员使用时的益处知之甚少。这项研究考察了老年痴呆症患者的这种情况。方法:采用集群随机设计,我们随机分配六个设施每周一次或三次自我指导的PARO会议,为期一个月。测量BPSD严重程度和照顾者负担的神经精神量表简要问卷得分。结果:85名参与者的研究结果表明,每周三次的护理者负担显著减轻(最小二乘[LS]均值:-3.29,95%可信区间[CI]: [-6.26, -0.32], p = 0.030)。对于BPSD的严重程度,虽然观察到有临床意义的改善,但由于统计能力不足,没有发现显著差异(校正LS平均值:-1.98,95% CI: [-4.10, 0.15], p = 0.068)。讨论:机器人使用频率的增加减轻了护理人员的负担,并在临床上显示出BPSD严重程度的显著改善趋势。
{"title":"A Randomized Trial Using PARO with Minimal Caregiver Involvement on Older Adults with Dementia in Group Homes.","authors":"Kaoru Inoue, Mitsunobu Kono, Ryuji Kobayashi, Chiyomi Yatsu, Daryl Patrick Gamboa Yao, Takanori Shibata, Joseph F Coughlin, Masahiro Shigeta","doi":"10.1002/alz.71163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PARO, a baby seal robot, has shown promise in addressing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in clinical settings. However, little is known about PARO's benefits when used independently of health professionals. This study examined that scenario in older adults with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Applying a cluster-randomized design, we randomly assigned six facilities to once- or thrice-weekly self-directed PARO sessions for a month. BPSD severity and caregiver burden scores of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Brief Questionnaire were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from 85 participants indicated a significant reduction in caregiver burden in the thrice-weekly group (least-squares [LS] mean: -3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-6.26, -0.32], p = 0.030). For BPSD severity, while clinically meaningful improvement was observed, no significant difference was found (adjusted LS mean: -1.98, 95% CI: [-4.10, 0.15], p = 0.068) due to insufficient statistical power.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Increasing robot use frequency reduced the caregiver burden and demonstrated a clinically significant improvement trend in the BPSD severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 2","pages":"e71163"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146206760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kejal Kantarci, Firat Kara, Nirubol Tosakulwong, Angela J. Fought, Christopher G. Schwarz, Matthew L. Senjem, June Kendall-Thomas, Paul Min, Val J. Lowe, Clifford R. Jack, Ekta Kapoor, Julie A. Fields, Kent R. Bailey, Taryn T. James, Laura Faubion, Rogerio A. Lobo, JoAnn E. Manson, Lubna Pal, Dustin B. Hammers, Eliot A. Brinton, Michael Malek-Ahmadi, Marcelle I. Cedars, Frederick N. Naftolin, Nanette Santoro, Virginia M. Miller, Sherman M. Harman, N. Maritza Dowling, Carey E. Gleason