首页 > 最新文献

Alzheimer's & Dementia最新文献

英文 中文
Biological age acceleration associates with Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarker levels 生物年龄加速与阿尔茨海默病血浆生物标志物水平相关
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71005
Jaclyn M. Eissman, Yiyi Ma, Min Qiao, Dolly Reyes-Dumeyer, Angel Piriz, Annie J. Lee, Rafael A. Lantigua, Martin Medrano, Diones Rivera Mejia, Lawrence S. Honig, Francine Grodstein, David A. Bennett, Philip L. De Jager, Clifton L. Dalgard, Richard Mayeux, Badri N. Vardarajan

INTRODUCTION

Epigenetic clocks associate with neuropathology and Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical risk, but findings are mixed regarding whether clocks associate with blood-based biomarkers and in non-European populations.

METHODS

We calculated biological age and age acceleration from blood methylation data in 704 older Hispanic adults and tested associations with clinical diagnosis and antemortem biomarker levels.

RESULTS

Age acceleration was significantly associated with sex, clinical diagnosis, and levels of eight plasma biomarkers, including P-tau217 levels. Additionally, biomarker associations trended more significantly among APOE-ε4 non-carriers. We also identified that methylation levels in CD4 and CD8 T-cell types are associated with age acceleration.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated that biological age acceleration, measured in blood, in a Hispanic cohort enriched for preclinical individuals, can stratify clinical AD risk and is associated with plasma AD biomarker levels.

Highlights

  1. Blood-based aging clocks associate with Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarker levels.
  2. Biological aging appears relevant to pathological aging in apolipoprotein E (APOE) -ε4 non-carriers.
  3. Immune T-cell composition relates to biological aging.
表观遗传时钟与神经病理学和阿尔茨海默病(AD)临床风险相关,但关于时钟是否与基于血液的生物标志物相关以及在非欧洲人群中的研究结果好坏参半。
{"title":"Biological age acceleration associates with Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarker levels","authors":"Jaclyn M. Eissman,&nbsp;Yiyi Ma,&nbsp;Min Qiao,&nbsp;Dolly Reyes-Dumeyer,&nbsp;Angel Piriz,&nbsp;Annie J. Lee,&nbsp;Rafael A. Lantigua,&nbsp;Martin Medrano,&nbsp;Diones Rivera Mejia,&nbsp;Lawrence S. Honig,&nbsp;Francine Grodstein,&nbsp;David A. Bennett,&nbsp;Philip L. De Jager,&nbsp;Clifton L. Dalgard,&nbsp;Richard Mayeux,&nbsp;Badri N. Vardarajan","doi":"10.1002/alz.71005","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71005","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Epigenetic clocks associate with neuropathology and Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical risk, but findings are mixed regarding whether clocks associate with blood-based biomarkers and in non-European populations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We calculated biological age and age acceleration from blood methylation data in 704 older Hispanic adults and tested associations with clinical diagnosis and <i>antemortem</i> biomarker levels.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Age acceleration was significantly associated with sex, clinical diagnosis, and levels of eight plasma biomarkers, including P-tau217 levels. Additionally, biomarker associations trended more significantly among <i>APOE</i>-ε4 non-carriers. We also identified that methylation levels in CD4 and CD8 T-cell types are associated with age acceleration.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We demonstrated that biological age acceleration, measured in blood, in a Hispanic cohort enriched for preclinical individuals, can stratify clinical AD risk and is associated with plasma AD biomarker levels.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ol>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Blood-based aging clocks associate with Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarker levels.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Biological aging appears relevant to pathological aging in apolipoprotein E (<i>APOE)</i> -ε4 non-carriers.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Immune T-cell composition relates to biological aging.</li>\u0000 </ol>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Braak stage agreement between four Tau PET tracers 生物标志物。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/alz70856_107635
Andreia Rocha, Bruna Bellaver, Carolina Soares, Pamela C.L. Ferreira, Emma Ruppert, Marina Scop Madeiros, Guilherme Povala, Livia Amaral, Guilherme Bauer-Negrini, Firoza Z Lussier, Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues, Rayan Mroué, Joseph C. Masdeu, Dana L Tudorascu, David N. Soleimani-Meigooni, Juan Fortea, Val J Lowe, Hwamee Oh, Belen Pascual, Brian A. Gordon, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Suzanne L. Baker, Tharick A Pascoal

Background

The Alzheimer's disease (AD) Braak staging is a key framework for classifying tau pathology progression in AD based on histopathological post-mortem brain examinations. However, adapting it to PET imaging can be challenging due to differences in tracer uptake patterns and binding properties, which affect sensitivity, specificity, and regional staging. This study compares Braak staging across four tau PET tracers: Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948.

Methods

We assessed 90 participants across the AD spectrum (46 CU, 31 MCI, 13 dementia; mean age 66.1 ± 7.8) using Aβ PET and four tau PET tracers: (Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948). Braak positivity was defined based on Aβ− CU individuals (mean +2.5 SD, SUVR). To evaluate systematic bias and agreement between tracers, we computed pairwise differences at corresponding Braak stage estimates and applied the Bland-Altman method to assess mean bias and limits of agreement. Additionally, Tau PET Braak region trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method.

Results

Braak stage trajectories as a function of Aβ differ depending on the tracer and the sequential order of abnormality is highly variable. For instance, while for MK6240, RO948 and PI2620, Braak I is the first region to became abnormal, for Flortaucipir the earliest region to became abnormal is Braak IV (Figure 1). This variable pattern of abnormality impacts in the concordance of Braak staging between tracers with the highest Braak staging agreement resulting in concordance levels of approximately 70%. The highest levels of agreement between tracers usually happen at Braak 0 or Braak IV-V, with intermediate stages showing very low concordance (Figure 2). The Bland-Altman analysis identified wide limits of agreement, suggesting high variability and high tracer-specific differences (Figure 3). On the other hand, it also identified that mean differences between tracers were small, indicating minimal systematic bias.

Conclusion

These preliminary findings reveal discrepancies in Braak staging when comparing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620 and RO948. These findings suggest that while the tracers provide comparable stages on average, they may not be fully interchangeable in individual cases.

背景:基于死后脑组织病理学检查,阿尔茨海默病(AD) Braak分期是对AD中tau病理进展进行分类的关键框架。然而,由于示踪剂摄取模式和结合特性的差异,使其适应PET成像可能具有挑战性,这会影响灵敏度,特异性和区域分期。本研究比较了四种tau蛋白PET示踪剂的Braak分期:Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620和RO948。方法:我们使用Aβ PET和四种tau PET示踪剂(Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620和RO948)评估了90名AD谱参与者(46例CU, 31例MCI, 13例痴呆,平均年龄66.1±7.8)。根据Aβ- CU个体(平均+2.5 SD, SUVR)定义Braak阳性。为了评估示踪剂之间的系统偏倚和一致性,我们计算了相应Braak阶段估计值的两两差异,并应用Bland-Altman方法评估平均偏倚和一致性限度。此外,使用Lowess方法将Tau PET Braak区域轨迹建模为Aβ负荷(Centiloid scale)的函数。结果:作为a β函数的Braak阶段轨迹取决于示踪剂,并且异常的顺序变化很大。如MK6240、RO948和PI2620, Braak I是最早出现异常的区域,Flortaucipir最早出现异常的区域是Braak IV(图1)。这种可变的异常模式影响了示踪剂之间Braak分期的一致性,其Braak分期一致性最高,一致性水平约为70%。示踪剂之间一致性的最高水平通常发生在Braak 0或Braak IV-V,中间阶段显示非常低的一致性(图2)。Bland-Altman分析确定了广泛的一致性限制,表明高可变性和高示踪剂特异性差异(图3)。另一方面,它还确定示踪剂之间的平均差异很小,表明最小的系统偏差。结论:这些初步发现揭示了Flortaucipir、MK6240、PI2620和RO948在Braak分期上的差异。这些发现表明,虽然示踪剂平均提供了可比较的分期,但它们在个别病例中可能无法完全互换。
{"title":"Assessing Braak stage agreement between four Tau PET tracers","authors":"Andreia Rocha,&nbsp;Bruna Bellaver,&nbsp;Carolina Soares,&nbsp;Pamela C.L. Ferreira,&nbsp;Emma Ruppert,&nbsp;Marina Scop Madeiros,&nbsp;Guilherme Povala,&nbsp;Livia Amaral,&nbsp;Guilherme Bauer-Negrini,&nbsp;Firoza Z Lussier,&nbsp;Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues,&nbsp;Rayan Mroué,&nbsp;Joseph C. Masdeu,&nbsp;Dana L Tudorascu,&nbsp;David N. Soleimani-Meigooni,&nbsp;Juan Fortea,&nbsp;Val J Lowe,&nbsp;Hwamee Oh,&nbsp;Belen Pascual,&nbsp;Brian A. Gordon,&nbsp;Pedro Rosa-Neto,&nbsp;Suzanne L. Baker,&nbsp;Tharick A Pascoal","doi":"10.1002/alz70856_107635","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz70856_107635","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The Alzheimer's disease (AD) Braak staging is a key framework for classifying tau pathology progression in AD based on histopathological post-mortem brain examinations. However, adapting it to PET imaging can be challenging due to differences in tracer uptake patterns and binding properties, which affect sensitivity, specificity, and regional staging. This study compares Braak staging across four tau PET tracers: Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We assessed 90 participants across the AD spectrum (46 CU, 31 MCI, 13 dementia; mean age 66.1 ± 7.8) using Aβ PET and four tau PET tracers: (Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948). Braak positivity was defined based on Aβ− CU individuals (mean +2.5 SD, SUVR). To evaluate systematic bias and agreement between tracers, we computed pairwise differences at corresponding Braak stage estimates and applied the Bland-Altman method to assess mean bias and limits of agreement. Additionally, Tau PET Braak region trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Braak stage trajectories as a function of Aβ differ depending on the tracer and the sequential order of abnormality is highly variable. For instance, while for MK6240, RO948 and PI2620, Braak I is the first region to became abnormal, for Flortaucipir the earliest region to became abnormal is Braak IV (Figure 1). This variable pattern of abnormality impacts in the concordance of Braak staging between tracers with the highest Braak staging agreement resulting in concordance levels of approximately 70%. The highest levels of agreement between tracers usually happen at Braak 0 or Braak IV-V, with intermediate stages showing very low concordance (Figure 2). The Bland-Altman analysis identified wide limits of agreement, suggesting high variability and high tracer-specific differences (Figure 3). On the other hand, it also identified that mean differences between tracers were small, indicating minimal systematic bias.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These preliminary findings reveal discrepancies in Braak staging when comparing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620 and RO948. These findings suggest that while the tracers provide comparable stages on average, they may not be fully interchangeable in individual cases.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146027837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
World Dementia Council Update 世界痴呆症理事会最新动态
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71137
<p>The year 2025 saw rapid advancements, close collaboration, and shared learning across the global dementia community. To continue building that momentum and advancing efforts to address dementia, the World Dementia Council (WDC) will host a wide range of events in 2026. From large summits to virtual dialogues, these gatherings will convene key leaders across the dementia field to exchange new insights, share lessons learned, and help ensure progress continues around the globe.</p><p>Building upon the advances of 2025, the WDC will take an even deeper dive into brain health, advocacy, and innovation through its programming. With so many scientific advances in brain health, it is more important than ever to translate this knowledge into action. One of the most effective ways to do this is through public policy and advocacy efforts. On January 27, 2026, the WDC will hold a virtual dialogue to explore how to effectively build the brain health narrative while aligning with mental health, cognitive aging, and brain-capital frameworks. Participants will discuss targeted brain health messaging, advocacy strategies, and participating organizations will provide real-world examples of how they are engaging policy-makers and framing brain health to effect the most change.</p><p>In the spring, the WDC will convene experts to explore another emerging and increasingly influential topic: artificial intelligence (AI). This discussion will highlight how AI is transforming dementia research, diagnostics, and care. Participants will share innovative approaches to leveraging AI to accelerate change across health systems and advance novel research discoveries.</p><p>Additional dialogues and roundtables will be added throughout the year, offering a unique platform for experts across disciplines and sectors to share the progress and knowledge. As a continuation from 2025, some events will specifically focus on dementia care delivery, research, and innovation across India.</p><p>In addition to its annual program of events, the WDC will hold three major summits in 2026, each examining a different aspect of dementia. The first Summit will take place on April 29 in Istanbul, Turkey, in partnership with the Alzheimer's Association, the day before the Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) Satellite Symposium. Building upon the WDC's focus on translating science into action, this Summit will specifically address how advances in dementia research related to prevention, diagnostics, and treatments can be translated into equitable, sustainable, and practical public health action. Discussions will cover implementation at multiple levels, from public policy and health systems to community- and individual-level approaches.</p><p>On October 20, the WDC will hold its main global Summit convening in London, England, bringing together senior leaders from government, research, health systems, community, and industry. The Summit will explore how advances in treatment a
2025年,全球痴呆症界取得了快速进展,开展了密切合作,并分享了经验。为了继续保持这一势头并推进应对痴呆症的努力,世界痴呆症理事会将在2026年举办一系列广泛的活动。从大型峰会到虚拟对话,这些聚会将召集痴呆症领域的主要领导人交流新的见解,分享经验教训,并帮助确保全球继续取得进展。
{"title":"World Dementia Council Update","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/alz.71137","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71137","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The year 2025 saw rapid advancements, close collaboration, and shared learning across the global dementia community. To continue building that momentum and advancing efforts to address dementia, the World Dementia Council (WDC) will host a wide range of events in 2026. From large summits to virtual dialogues, these gatherings will convene key leaders across the dementia field to exchange new insights, share lessons learned, and help ensure progress continues around the globe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Building upon the advances of 2025, the WDC will take an even deeper dive into brain health, advocacy, and innovation through its programming. With so many scientific advances in brain health, it is more important than ever to translate this knowledge into action. One of the most effective ways to do this is through public policy and advocacy efforts. On January 27, 2026, the WDC will hold a virtual dialogue to explore how to effectively build the brain health narrative while aligning with mental health, cognitive aging, and brain-capital frameworks. Participants will discuss targeted brain health messaging, advocacy strategies, and participating organizations will provide real-world examples of how they are engaging policy-makers and framing brain health to effect the most change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the spring, the WDC will convene experts to explore another emerging and increasingly influential topic: artificial intelligence (AI). This discussion will highlight how AI is transforming dementia research, diagnostics, and care. Participants will share innovative approaches to leveraging AI to accelerate change across health systems and advance novel research discoveries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Additional dialogues and roundtables will be added throughout the year, offering a unique platform for experts across disciplines and sectors to share the progress and knowledge. As a continuation from 2025, some events will specifically focus on dementia care delivery, research, and innovation across India.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In addition to its annual program of events, the WDC will hold three major summits in 2026, each examining a different aspect of dementia. The first Summit will take place on April 29 in Istanbul, Turkey, in partnership with the Alzheimer's Association, the day before the Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) Satellite Symposium. Building upon the WDC's focus on translating science into action, this Summit will specifically address how advances in dementia research related to prevention, diagnostics, and treatments can be translated into equitable, sustainable, and practical public health action. Discussions will cover implementation at multiple levels, from public policy and health systems to community- and individual-level approaches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On October 20, the WDC will hold its main global Summit convening in London, England, bringing together senior leaders from government, research, health systems, community, and industry. The Summit will explore how advances in treatment a","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71137","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A cognitive screening program in community-based medical clinics to facilitate Latino participation in Alzheimer's disease research 在社区医疗诊所开展认知筛查项目,以促进拉丁裔人参与阿尔茨海默病研究。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71132
David P. Salmon, Caytre Ede, Christina Gigliotti, Emily A. Little, Melanie L. Quiring, Roberto Gratianne, Jairo A. Romero, Diane M. Jacobs, Guerry M. Peavy, Douglas Galasko

INTRODUCTION

Relatively low rates of Latino participation in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research makes it difficult to determine whether identified disease mechanisms, risk factors, or novel treatments generalize to this population.

METHODS

We introduced ADRD research opportunities through a model cognitive screening program in primary care and neurology specialty care clinics in areas with high proportions of Latino residents.

RESULTS

Out of 523 Latino adults (mean age = 72.1 years, mean education = 6.8 years, 62.1% female, 88.1% tested in Spanish), 520 allowed the use of screening data for research, and high percentages agreed to a research registry with contact about ADRD research opportunities (primary care: 91.9%, neurology: 86.6%). Registrants supported 368 referrals to 45 studies (21% successfully recruited). Thirty-one individuals participated in ≥1 study, producing 79 enrollments across 15 ADRD studies.

DISCUSSION

Results demonstrate that combining a needed clinical service with recruitment efforts can enhance participation of older Latino adults in ADRD research.

拉丁裔参与阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)研究的比例相对较低,这使得很难确定已确定的疾病机制、危险因素或新的治疗方法是否适用于该人群。方法:我们通过在拉丁裔居民比例高的地区的初级保健和神经内科专科护理诊所的模型认知筛查项目引入了ADRD的研究机会。结果:在523名拉丁裔成年人中(平均年龄为72.1岁,平均受教育程度为6.8年,62.1%为女性,88.1%为西班牙语),520名允许使用筛查数据进行研究,高比例的人同意研究登记处联系有关ADRD研究机会(初级保健:91.9%,神经病学:86.6%)。注册者支持368人转介至45项研究(21%成功招募)。31名受试者参与了≥1项研究,15项ADRD研究共纳入79名受试者。讨论:结果表明,将必要的临床服务与招募工作相结合,可以提高老年拉丁裔成年人在ADRD研究中的参与度。
{"title":"A cognitive screening program in community-based medical clinics to facilitate Latino participation in Alzheimer's disease research","authors":"David P. Salmon,&nbsp;Caytre Ede,&nbsp;Christina Gigliotti,&nbsp;Emily A. Little,&nbsp;Melanie L. Quiring,&nbsp;Roberto Gratianne,&nbsp;Jairo A. Romero,&nbsp;Diane M. Jacobs,&nbsp;Guerry M. Peavy,&nbsp;Douglas Galasko","doi":"10.1002/alz.71132","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71132","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Relatively low rates of Latino participation in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research makes it difficult to determine whether identified disease mechanisms, risk factors, or novel treatments generalize to this population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We introduced ADRD research opportunities through a model cognitive screening program in primary care and neurology specialty care clinics in areas with high proportions of Latino residents.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Out of 523 Latino adults (mean age = 72.1 years, mean education = 6.8 years, 62.1% female, 88.1% tested in Spanish), 520 allowed the use of screening data for research, and high percentages agreed to a research registry with contact about ADRD research opportunities (primary care: 91.9%, neurology: 86.6%). Registrants supported 368 referrals to 45 studies (21% successfully recruited). Thirty-one individuals participated in ≥1 study, producing 79 enrollments across 15 ADRD studies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Results demonstrate that combining a needed clinical service with recruitment efforts can enhance participation of older Latino adults in ADRD research.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826067/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The microbiota–gut–brain axis in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a scoping review of human studies 轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中的微生物-肠-脑轴:对人类研究的范围审查。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71023
Alison Warren, Zan Wynia, Patrick G. Corr, Mershad Fahim Devin, Zeynep Celikkol, Lindsey Gordon, Mina Farah, Michaela Karam, Daniel Villarreal, Scott A. Jackson, Leigh A. Frame

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is projected to become the highest-burden neurological disorder globally. Mounting evidence implicates the gut microbiome in AD pathogenesis. This scoping review of gut microbiomes in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD included dietary and probiotic interventions. We included original research and systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Animal and non-English studies were excluded. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through February 2023. Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-Extension for Scoping Reviews (ScR) checklist, we screened 4751 articles, with 58 meeting predefined inclusion criteria. Our results demonstrated that gut dysbiosis was frequently reported in MCI and AD, including increased Pseudomonadota and Actinomycetota in AD and reduced diversity in some cases. Probiotic and dietary interventions showed promise in modulating cognition and microbiota, inconsistently. Emerging evidence links dysbiosis to cognitive decline; however, methodological heterogeneity and limited follow-up impede causal inference. Research should prioritize standardized protocols, functional microbiome analysis, and longitudinal human studies to clarify therapeutic potential.

Highlights

  • Gut dysbiosis is a common feature of MCI and AD, with phylum-level microbial shifts frequently observed.
  • Pseudomonadota and Actinomycetota are enriched in AD across multiple human studies.
  • Beneficial genera like Faecalibacterium and Roseburia are consistently reduced in MCI and AD in a small number of studies.
  • Probiotic and dietary interventions are promising to modulate the microbiota–cognition axis.
  • More longitudinal human studies are needed to assess causal microbiome relationships.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)预计将成为全球负担最高的神经系统疾病。越来越多的证据表明,肠道微生物群与阿尔茨海默病的发病机制有关。对轻度认知障碍(MCI)和AD的肠道微生物组进行了范围审查,包括饮食和益生菌干预。我们纳入了原始研究和系统综述/荟萃分析。排除了动物和非英语研究。我们检索了PubMed, Scopus和Cochrane Library,截止到2023年2月。使用Arksey和O'Malley的框架和系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)-扩展范围评价(ScR)检查表,我们筛选了4751篇文章,其中58篇符合预定义的纳入标准。我们的研究结果表明,MCI和AD患者经常报告肠道生态失调,包括AD患者假单胞菌群和放线菌群增加,某些病例的多样性减少。益生菌和饮食干预在调节认知和微生物群方面表现出希望,但不一致。新出现的证据表明生态失调与认知能力下降有关;然而,方法的异质性和有限的随访阻碍了因果推理。研究应优先考虑标准化方案、功能性微生物组分析和纵向人体研究,以阐明治疗潜力。重点:肠道生态失调是MCI和AD的共同特征,经常观察到门水平的微生物转移。在多项人体研究中,假单胞菌和放线菌在AD中含量丰富。在少数研究中,Faecalibacterium和Roseburia等有益菌在MCI和AD中持续减少。益生菌和饮食干预有望调节微生物群认知轴。需要更多的纵向人体研究来评估微生物组的因果关系。
{"title":"The microbiota–gut–brain axis in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a scoping review of human studies","authors":"Alison Warren,&nbsp;Zan Wynia,&nbsp;Patrick G. Corr,&nbsp;Mershad Fahim Devin,&nbsp;Zeynep Celikkol,&nbsp;Lindsey Gordon,&nbsp;Mina Farah,&nbsp;Michaela Karam,&nbsp;Daniel Villarreal,&nbsp;Scott A. Jackson,&nbsp;Leigh A. Frame","doi":"10.1002/alz.71023","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71023","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is projected to become the highest-burden neurological disorder globally. Mounting evidence implicates the gut microbiome in AD pathogenesis. This scoping review of gut microbiomes in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD included dietary and probiotic interventions. We included original research and systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Animal and non-English studies were excluded. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through February 2023. Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-Extension for Scoping Reviews (ScR) checklist, we screened 4751 articles, with 58 meeting predefined inclusion criteria. Our results demonstrated that gut dysbiosis was frequently reported in MCI and AD, including increased <i>Pseudomonadota</i> and <i>Actinomycetota</i> in AD and reduced diversity in some cases. Probiotic and dietary interventions showed promise in modulating cognition and microbiota, inconsistently. Emerging evidence links dysbiosis to cognitive decline; however, methodological heterogeneity and limited follow-up impede causal inference. Research should prioritize standardized protocols, functional microbiome analysis, and longitudinal human studies to clarify therapeutic potential.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Gut dysbiosis is a common feature of MCI and AD, with phylum-level microbial shifts frequently observed.\u0000</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li><i>Pseudomonadota</i> and <i>Actinomycetota</i> are enriched in AD across multiple human studies.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Beneficial genera like <i>Faecalibacterium</i> and <i>Roseburia</i> are consistently reduced in MCI and AD in a small number of studies.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Probiotic and dietary interventions are promising to modulate the microbiota–cognition axis.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>More longitudinal human studies are needed to assess causal microbiome relationships.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12825029/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discordance between CSF amyloid beta and PET-derived amyloid status and its clinical implications 生物标志物。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/alz70856_106931
Gemma Natalie Wright, James Neil Dodds, Rifa Sanjida Punnota, Roberto Vicidomini, Paul Edison

Background

There has been a recent focus within Alzheimer's Disease (AD) research on potential CSF biomarkers as diagnostic tools. PET imaging and CSF biomarkers have been used to determine the amyloid status of individuals when characterising AD. While these measures have largely correlated with each other, it is also suggested that there could be patients who can have discordant results. However, it is still unclear what proportion of AD subjects demonstrate the discordance. Additionally, whether these changes are associated with different pathological and clinical characteristics of the patients. Here, we investigated the discordance between CSF Aβ42:40 and amyloid status and evaluated whether there are any significant changes in their levels of tau aggregation.

Method

313 participants’ data were selected from the ADNI database. The cutoff for Aβ42:40 was then calculated using the Youden Index resulting from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The formula used was J = maxc {Se (c) + Sp (c) − 1}, resulting in a maximum cutoff of J = 0.057 for Aβ42:40. This cutoff produced a discordance rate of 10.5%, with n = 33 of 313 patients being discordant. We then performed t-tests to investigate the potential clinical differences between concordant and discordant patients.

Result

Independent samples t-tests indicated that levels of pTau181 and total Tau significantly differed between the concordant and discordant groups. pTau181 was significantly lower in the discordant group (t(71.2)=-3.166, p = .002), as was Tau (t(53.9)=-2.046, p = .046). Further data is found in Figure 1.

Conclusion

Demonstration of different levels of tau deposition in the discordant groups implies there may be other pathological processes influencing neurodegeneration in these subjects. A discordance of 10% between CSF amyloid and PET amyloid implies that we should evaluate these subjects in greater detail before enrolling them in intervention studies.

References

1. Hansson, O. et al. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0485-0

2. Pyun, JM. et al. (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02766-6

背景:近年来,在阿尔茨海默病(AD)研究中,潜在的脑脊液生物标志物作为诊断工具一直是关注的焦点。PET成像和脑脊液生物标志物已被用于确定AD患者的淀粉样蛋白状态。虽然这些措施在很大程度上彼此相关,但也表明可能有患者的结果不一致。然而,尚不清楚有多少比例的AD受试者表现出这种不一致。此外,这些变化是否与患者不同的病理和临床特征有关。在这里,我们研究了脑脊液Aβ42:40和淀粉样蛋白状态之间的不一致,并评估了它们的tau聚集水平是否有任何显著变化。方法:从ADNI数据库中选取313例受试者资料。然后使用由受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线得出的约登指数(Youden Index)计算Aβ42:40的截止值。公式为J = maxc {Se (c) + Sp (c) - 1}, a β42:40的最大截止值为J = 0.057。这个截止值产生了10.5%的不一致率,313例患者中有n = 33例不一致。然后我们进行了t检验来调查和谐患者和不和谐患者之间潜在的临床差异。结果:独立样本t检验表明,pTau181和总Tau水平在和谐组和不和谐组之间存在显著差异。pTau181在不一致组中显著降低(t(71.2)=-3.166, p = 0.002), Tau在不一致组中显著降低(t(53.9)=-2.046, p = 0.046)。进一步的数据见图1。结论:在不一致组中tau沉积水平的不同表明可能存在其他病理过程影响这些受试者的神经退行性变。脑脊液淀粉样蛋白和PET淀粉样蛋白之间存在10%的差异,这意味着我们应该在将这些受试者纳入干预研究之前对其进行更详细的评估。引用1。汉森,O.等人(2019)。https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195 - 019 - 0485 - 0 2。Pyun JM。等人(2024)https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02766-6。
{"title":"Discordance between CSF amyloid beta and PET-derived amyloid status and its clinical implications","authors":"Gemma Natalie Wright,&nbsp;James Neil Dodds,&nbsp;Rifa Sanjida Punnota,&nbsp;Roberto Vicidomini,&nbsp;Paul Edison","doi":"10.1002/alz70856_106931","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz70856_106931","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There has been a recent focus within Alzheimer's Disease (AD) research on potential CSF biomarkers as diagnostic tools. PET imaging and CSF biomarkers have been used to determine the amyloid status of individuals when characterising AD. While these measures have largely correlated with each other, it is also suggested that there could be patients who can have discordant results. However, it is still unclear what proportion of AD subjects demonstrate the discordance. Additionally, whether these changes are associated with different pathological and clinical characteristics of the patients. Here, we investigated the discordance between CSF Aβ42:40 and amyloid status and evaluated whether there are any significant changes in their levels of tau aggregation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>313 participants’ data were selected from the ADNI database. The cutoff for Aβ42:40 was then calculated using the Youden Index resulting from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The formula used was <i>J</i> = max<i>c</i> {Se (<i>c</i>) + Sp (<i>c</i>) − 1}, resulting in a maximum cutoff of <i>J</i> = 0.057 for Aβ42:40. This cutoff produced a discordance rate of 10.5%, with <i>n</i> = 33 of 313 patients being discordant. We then performed t-tests to investigate the potential clinical differences between concordant and discordant patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Result</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Independent samples t-tests indicated that levels of pTau181 and total Tau significantly differed between the concordant and discordant groups. pTau181 was significantly lower in the discordant group (t(71.2)=-3.166, <i>p</i> = .002), as was Tau (t(53.9)=-2.046, <i>p</i> = .046). Further data is found in Figure 1.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Demonstration of different levels of tau deposition in the discordant groups implies there may be other pathological processes influencing neurodegeneration in these subjects. A discordance of 10% between CSF amyloid and PET amyloid implies that we should evaluate these subjects in greater detail before enrolling them in intervention studies.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p><b>References</b></p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>1. Hansson, O. et al. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0485-0</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>2. Pyun, JM. et al. (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02766-6</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826532/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146027834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Data sharing practices and experiences among Alzheimer's disease and related dementia researchers 阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症研究人员之间的数据共享实践和经验
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71046
Jalayne J. Arias, Karen E. Nielsen, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Luke W Bonham, Eric G. Campbell, James J. Lah, Margaret A. Manchester, Catherine E. A. Scipion, Yufei Wang, Leslie E. Wolf, Michelle M. Mello, Jennifer S. Yokoyama

INTRODUCTION

Data sharing among investigators of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) allows for representative datasets, supports reproducibility, and increases rigor. Yet limited evidence on investigators’ practices and experiences precludes solutions that promote optimal practices.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of US-based ADRD investigators with National Institutes of Health awards funded between 2016 and 2019.

RESULTS

Among 585 respondents (response rate of 64.5%), 62.9% were engaged in data sharing in the previous 5 years. Among data requesters, 61.8% reported that all requests were fulfilled within 6 months. Among those who received requests, 85.1% reported fulfilling all requests. Reasons for declining requests included existing data use agreement requirements, Institutional Review Board standards, and resource limitations. Respondents who shared data reported positive consequences (e.g., developing collaborations) more often than negative (e.g., being “scooped”).

DISCUSSION

Data sharing behaviors among ADRD researchers are encouraging. Nevertheless, addressing remaining barriers could help avoid the negative consequences of data requests not being fulfilled.

Highlights

  • Data sharing is critical to advancing research in ADRD.
  • Investigators are engaged in data sharing through initiating or receiving requests.
  • Most data requests initiated or received by ADRD investigators are fulfilled.
  • Investigators who fulfill requests report positive experiences with sharing data.
  • Delay or decline of requests can result in consequences that impede research.
阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)研究人员之间的数据共享允许有代表性的数据集,支持可重复性,并增加严谨性。然而,关于调查人员实践和经验的有限证据排除了促进最佳实践的解决方案。
{"title":"Data sharing practices and experiences among Alzheimer's disease and related dementia researchers","authors":"Jalayne J. Arias,&nbsp;Karen E. Nielsen,&nbsp;Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic,&nbsp;Luke W Bonham,&nbsp;Eric G. Campbell,&nbsp;James J. Lah,&nbsp;Margaret A. Manchester,&nbsp;Catherine E. A. Scipion,&nbsp;Yufei Wang,&nbsp;Leslie E. Wolf,&nbsp;Michelle M. Mello,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Yokoyama","doi":"10.1002/alz.71046","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71046","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data sharing among investigators of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) allows for representative datasets, supports reproducibility, and increases rigor. Yet limited evidence on investigators’ practices and experiences precludes solutions that promote optimal practices.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A cross-sectional survey of US-based ADRD investigators with National Institutes of Health awards funded between 2016 and 2019.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 585 respondents (response rate of 64.5%), 62.9% were engaged in data sharing in the previous 5 years. Among data requesters, 61.8% reported that all requests were fulfilled within 6 months. Among those who received requests, 85.1% reported fulfilling all requests. Reasons for declining requests included existing data use agreement requirements, Institutional Review Board standards, and resource limitations. Respondents who shared data reported positive consequences (e.g., developing collaborations) more often than negative (e.g., being “scooped”).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data sharing behaviors among ADRD researchers are encouraging. Nevertheless, addressing remaining barriers could help avoid the negative consequences of data requests not being fulfilled.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Data sharing is critical to advancing research in ADRD.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Investigators are engaged in data sharing through initiating or receiving requests.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Most data requests initiated or received by ADRD investigators are fulfilled.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Investigators who fulfill requests report positive experiences with sharing data.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Delay or decline of requests can result in consequences that impede research.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71046","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “A blood based mitochondrial functional index biomarker for Alzheimer's disease” 更正“基于血液的阿尔茨海默病线粒体功能指数生物标志物”。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71171

Hauger BM, Kemna RE, Kueck PJ, et al. A blood based mitochondrial functional index biomarker for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(12):e71061. doi:10.1002/alz.71061.

Figure order. Figure 1 should be Figure 2 and vice versa.

We apologize for this error.

hager BM, Kemna RE, Kueck PJ,等。阿尔茨海默病基于血液的线粒体功能指数生物标志物。阿尔茨海默病。2025;21(12):e71061。doi: 10.1002 / alz.71061。图顺序。图1应该是图2,反之亦然。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “A blood based mitochondrial functional index biomarker for Alzheimer's disease”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/alz.71171","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71171","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hauger BM, Kemna RE, Kueck PJ, et al. A blood based mitochondrial functional index biomarker for Alzheimer's disease. <i>Alzheimers Dement</i>. 2025;21(12):e71061. doi:10.1002/alz.71061.</p><p>Figure order. Figure 1 should be Figure 2 and vice versa.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823767/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plasma extracellular vesicles from APOE3 Christchurch carriers display a protective phenotype in early stages of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease APOE3克赖斯特彻奇携带者的血浆细胞外囊泡在常染色体显性阿尔茨海默病的早期阶段显示出保护性表型。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71148
Lina Pineda-Lopez, David Aguillon, Juan Villar-Vesga, Pablo Valderrama-Carmona, Alejandro Guerrero, Anil Upreti, Said Arevalo-Alquichire, Laura Correa, Karin Mendez-Castellanos, Diana Castaño, Gloria P. Cardona-Gomez, Geysson J. Fernandez, Leo A. Kim, Joseph F. Arboleda-Velasquez, Rafael Posada-Duque

INTRODUCTION

The PSEN1E280A mutation causes autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) with predictable onset, enabling presymptomatic studies. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging biomarkers of cognitive decline, but their role in early ADAD is unclear. The rare apolipoprotein E (APOE3) Christchurch (APOE3Ch) variant delays disease onset, yet its effect on EVs is unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed plasma EVs from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and non-MCI PSEN1E280A-APOE3 carriers and non-MCI PSEN1E280A-APOE3Ch carriers using flow cytometry, proteomics, and co-culture assays.

RESULTS

APOE3Ch-EVs showed reduced vascular activation and inflammatory cargo linked to β-catenin signaling, higher apoE levels, and enrichment in lipid-loaded EVs. They mimicked the protective effect of recombinant ApoE3Ch on endothelial integrity by restoring β-catenin nuclear localization. In contrast, EVs from non-MCI PSEN1E280A-APOE3 carriers displayed vascular and inflammatory signatures associated with poorer cognition and detrimental astrocyte–endothelium effects. These findings highlight APOE3Ch-EVs as modulators of vascular and inflammatory pathways with biomarker and therapeutic potential in ADAD.

简介:PSEN1E280A突变导致常染色体显性阿尔茨海默病(ADAD),具有可预测的发病,使症状前研究成为可能。细胞外囊泡(EVs)是认知能力下降的新兴生物标志物,但它们在早期ADAD中的作用尚不清楚。罕见的载脂蛋白E (APOE3)克赖斯特彻奇(APOE3Ch)变异延缓了疾病的发病,但其对ev的影响尚不清楚。方法:采用流式细胞术、蛋白质组学和共培养方法分析轻度认知障碍(MCI)和非MCI PSEN1E280A-APOE3携带者和非MCI PSEN1E280A-APOE3Ch携带者的血浆ev。结果:APOE3Ch-EVs显示血管激活和与β-catenin信号相关的炎症货物减少,apoE水平升高,并且在脂载EVs中富集。他们通过恢复β-连环蛋白的核定位,模拟了重组ApoE3Ch对内皮完整性的保护作用。相比之下,来自非mci PSEN1E280A-APOE3携带者的ev显示出与较差的认知和有害的星形胶质细胞内皮效应相关的血管和炎症特征。这些发现强调了apoe3ch - ev作为血管和炎症通路的调节剂,在ADAD中具有生物标志物和治疗潜力。
{"title":"Plasma extracellular vesicles from APOE3 Christchurch carriers display a protective phenotype in early stages of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease","authors":"Lina Pineda-Lopez,&nbsp;David Aguillon,&nbsp;Juan Villar-Vesga,&nbsp;Pablo Valderrama-Carmona,&nbsp;Alejandro Guerrero,&nbsp;Anil Upreti,&nbsp;Said Arevalo-Alquichire,&nbsp;Laura Correa,&nbsp;Karin Mendez-Castellanos,&nbsp;Diana Castaño,&nbsp;Gloria P. Cardona-Gomez,&nbsp;Geysson J. Fernandez,&nbsp;Leo A. Kim,&nbsp;Joseph F. Arboleda-Velasquez,&nbsp;Rafael Posada-Duque","doi":"10.1002/alz.71148","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71148","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The <i>PSEN1<sup>E280A</sup></i> mutation causes autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) with predictable onset, enabling presymptomatic studies. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging biomarkers of cognitive decline, but their role in early ADAD is unclear. The rare apolipoprotein E (<i>APOE3</i>) Christchurch (<i>APOE3<sup>Ch</sup></i>) variant delays disease onset, yet its effect on EVs is unknown.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We analyzed plasma EVs from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and non-MCI <i>PSEN1<sup>E280A</sup></i>-<i>APOE3</i> carriers and non-MCI <i>PSEN1<sup>E280A</sup></i>-<i>APOE3<sup>Ch</sup></i> carriers using flow cytometry, proteomics, and co-culture assays.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p><i>APOE3<sup>Ch</sup></i>-EVs showed reduced vascular activation and inflammatory cargo linked to β-catenin signaling, higher apoE levels, and enrichment in lipid-loaded EVs. They mimicked the protective effect of recombinant ApoE3Ch on endothelial integrity by restoring β-catenin nuclear localization. In contrast, EVs from non-MCI <i>PSEN1<sup>E280A</sup></i>-<i>APOE3</i> carriers displayed vascular and inflammatory signatures associated with poorer cognition and detrimental astrocyte–endothelium effects. These findings highlight <i>APOE3<sup>Ch</sup></i>-EVs as modulators of vascular and inflammatory pathways with biomarker and therapeutic potential in ADAD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of a 24-week resistance exercise intervention on cognitive function in cognitively normal older adults: The AGUEDA randomized controlled trial 24周抗阻运动干预对认知正常老年人认知功能的影响:AGUEDA随机对照试验
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71019
Beatriz Fernandez-Gamez, Patricio Solis-Urra, Andrea Coca-Pulido, Cristina Molina-Hidalgo, Marcos Olvera-Rojas, Esmée A. Bakker, Darío Bellón, Alessandro Sclafani, Jose Mora-Gonzalez, Javier Fernández-Ortega, Lucía Sánchez-Aranda, Isabel Martín-Fuentes, Angel Toval, Javier Sanchez-Martinez, Lu Wan, Manuel Gomez-Rio, Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Kirk I. Erickson, Francisco B. Ortega, Irene Esteban-Cornejo
<div> <section> <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3> <p>The Active Gains in Brain Using Exercise During Aging (AGUEDA) trial examined the effects of a 24 week resistance exercise (RE) intervention on executive function (EF) and other cognitive domains in cognitively normal older adults.</p> </section> <section> <h3> METHODS</h3> <p>Ninety participants (mean age, 71.8 years; 57.8% female) were randomized to an RE or control group. At baseline and 24 weeks, EF and other cognitive domains were assessed.</p> </section> <section> <h3> RESULTS</h3> <p>The RE group showed significant improvements in overall EF (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval = 0.14, 0.65), with no significant between-group difference (SMD = 0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.37). The RE group showed a significant improvement in attentional/inhibitory control (SMD = 0.43, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to the control group, while no effects were observed in other domains (all <i>p</i> > 0.12). Moderation by age, education, and subjective cognitive decline was observed.</p> </section> <section> <h3> DISCUSSION</h3> <p>Although no overall EF benefit was observed, RE improved attentional/inhibitory control in cognitively normal older adults. RE may yield greater benefits in vulnerable subgroups.</p> </section> <section> <h3> CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION</h3> <p>The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05186090).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Highlights</h3> <div> <ul> <li>Cognitive effects of resistance exercise (RE) may vary across different cognitive domains in cognitively healthy older adults.</li> <li>Twenty-four week RE produced selective improvements in attention/inhibitory control.</li> <li>RE did not improve executive function (EF), or other cognitive domains (episodic memory, processing speed, visuospatial processing, and working memory).</li> <li>RE improved muscular strength, which were associated with gains in EF, episodic memory and working memory.</li> <li>There is value in personalized exercise interventions tailored to individual risk populations, such as those with higher subjective cognitive decline
衰老过程中大脑运动的积极增益(AGUEDA)试验研究了24周抗阻运动(RE)干预对认知正常老年人执行功能(EF)和其他认知领域的影响。
{"title":"Effect of a 24-week resistance exercise intervention on cognitive function in cognitively normal older adults: The AGUEDA randomized controlled trial","authors":"Beatriz Fernandez-Gamez,&nbsp;Patricio Solis-Urra,&nbsp;Andrea Coca-Pulido,&nbsp;Cristina Molina-Hidalgo,&nbsp;Marcos Olvera-Rojas,&nbsp;Esmée A. Bakker,&nbsp;Darío Bellón,&nbsp;Alessandro Sclafani,&nbsp;Jose Mora-Gonzalez,&nbsp;Javier Fernández-Ortega,&nbsp;Lucía Sánchez-Aranda,&nbsp;Isabel Martín-Fuentes,&nbsp;Angel Toval,&nbsp;Javier Sanchez-Martinez,&nbsp;Lu Wan,&nbsp;Manuel Gomez-Rio,&nbsp;Teresa Liu-Ambrose,&nbsp;Kirk I. Erickson,&nbsp;Francisco B. Ortega,&nbsp;Irene Esteban-Cornejo","doi":"10.1002/alz.71019","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71019","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; INTRODUCTION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The Active Gains in Brain Using Exercise During Aging (AGUEDA) trial examined the effects of a 24 week resistance exercise (RE) intervention on executive function (EF) and other cognitive domains in cognitively normal older adults.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Ninety participants (mean age, 71.8 years; 57.8% female) were randomized to an RE or control group. At baseline and 24 weeks, EF and other cognitive domains were assessed.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; RESULTS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The RE group showed significant improvements in overall EF (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval = 0.14, 0.65), with no significant between-group difference (SMD = 0.13, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.37). The RE group showed a significant improvement in attentional/inhibitory control (SMD = 0.43, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001) compared to the control group, while no effects were observed in other domains (all &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &gt; 0.12). Moderation by age, education, and subjective cognitive decline was observed.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; DISCUSSION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Although no overall EF benefit was observed, RE improved attentional/inhibitory control in cognitively normal older adults. RE may yield greater benefits in vulnerable subgroups.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05186090).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Highlights&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Cognitive effects of resistance exercise (RE) may vary across different cognitive domains in cognitively healthy older adults.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Twenty-four week RE produced selective improvements in attention/inhibitory control.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;RE did not improve executive function (EF), or other cognitive domains (episodic memory, processing speed, visuospatial processing, and working memory).&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;RE improved muscular strength, which were associated with gains in EF, episodic memory and working memory.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;There is value in personalized exercise interventions tailored to individual risk populations, such as those with higher subjective cognitive decline","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146005904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1