Stephen Gregg, Jeffrey S. Strock, Russ W. Gesch, Jeffrey A. Coulter, Axel Garcia y Garcia
Winter camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is a potential third crop to diversify maize (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotations in the upper Midwest. Although generally considered a low-input crop, empirical evidence suggests that it responds to added nitrogen (N) fertilization. However, optimum agronomic N rates have not been extensively studied in the region. A study was conducted from fall 2018 to fall 2020 at three locations to assess the effects of N fertilizer application time (all N-rate applied in spring and N-rate split applied in fall and spring) and rates on biomass and seed yield, and quality of winter camelina. Nitrogen application time did not affect yields. Both biomass and seed yields were greatly affected by N rates at all locations. Nitrogen had minimal effects on the oil and protein content of seeds, although greater N rates were associated with a slight decrease in oil content and a slight increase in protein content. The number of branches and silicles per plant varied significantly with N rates in all locations. The seed-to-silicle ratio showed significant differences in two out of three locations. Residual soil N increased with increasing N rates. A fertilization rate of 67 kg ha−1 provided the highest camelina seed yield. While this study has determined the agronomic maximum rate for applied N, further economic analysis could provide comprehensive decision-making for farmers.
{"title":"Rate and time of nitrogen fertilizer application for winter camelina","authors":"Stephen Gregg, Jeffrey S. Strock, Russ W. Gesch, Jeffrey A. Coulter, Axel Garcia y Garcia","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21610","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21610","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Winter camelina [<i>Camelina sativa</i> (L.) Crantz] is a potential third crop to diversify maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.)–soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotations in the upper Midwest. Although generally considered a low-input crop, empirical evidence suggests that it responds to added nitrogen (N) fertilization. However, optimum agronomic N rates have not been extensively studied in the region. A study was conducted from fall 2018 to fall 2020 at three locations to assess the effects of N fertilizer application time (all N-rate applied in spring and N-rate split applied in fall and spring) and rates on biomass and seed yield, and quality of winter camelina. Nitrogen application time did not affect yields. Both biomass and seed yields were greatly affected by N rates at all locations. Nitrogen had minimal effects on the oil and protein content of seeds, although greater N rates were associated with a slight decrease in oil content and a slight increase in protein content. The number of branches and silicles per plant varied significantly with N rates in all locations. The seed-to-silicle ratio showed significant differences in two out of three locations. Residual soil N increased with increasing N rates. A fertilization rate of 67 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> provided the highest camelina seed yield. While this study has determined the agronomic maximum rate for applied N, further economic analysis could provide comprehensive decision-making for farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21610","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141382022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Since the dawn of agriculture, food security was improved by replacing hunting with domesticated animals and gathering was replaced with planting seeds in the soil. In many areas, agricultural practices resulted in ecological systems being replaced with domesticated plants and animals. This fundamental process created the food resources needed to build the Great Pyramid of Giza and the Hanging gardens of Babylon. However, these food production systems also contributed to the Irish potato famine, the North America Great Plains dust bowl, and the extinction of many animals. From these spectacular successes and failures, we learned that food and environmental security requires a skilled workforce and that new innovations are often needed to solve complex problems. For example, during the transition from the European Middle Age to the 16th century, European farmers learned that food and economic security was improved by switching from a two-field rotation (one seeded and one fallow or resting) to the Norfolk rotation that consisted of wheat (Triticum aestivum), turnips (Brassica rapa), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and clover (Trifolium). This rotation increased productivity, improved diets, and provided the food needed for the industrial revolution.
Over time, we also learned that sustainable food production requires careful attention to soil and environmental health. For example, a multiyear drought during the 1930's when combined with the plowing of the North America Great Plains led to the “Dust Bowl”. Based on these and other lessons, we hypothesize that to avoid future food and economic insecurity, we need a common vision that considers soil, ecosystem, human, and environmental health (D. E. Clay et al., 2012; Smart et al., 2015).
Building a unified vision is complicated by scientific disagreements, social differences, and a lack of consensus on the fundamental facts. For example, how much land is used to produce annual crops in the North America Great Plains? The answer to this question is complicated by different databases producing different answers (Lark et al., 2015, 2017; Reitsma et al., 2016; USDA, 2020; Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems, 2024) and by research papers that make unvalidated predictions. For example, Rashford et al. (2010) predicted that in the Prairie Pothole region of North America, approximately 12.1 million ha (30 million acres) of grasslands would be converted to cultivated crops by 2011 if the corn (Zea mays) selling price continued to increase. Subsequent analysis showed that even though prices increased, the predicted wide-scale land use changes never occurred (Joshi et al., 2019; Lark et al., 2015; Wright & Wimberly, 2013). The lack of change was attributed to farmers who valued multiple income streams and whose actions w
自从有了农业,人们用驯养的动物代替了狩猎,用在土壤中播种代替了采集,从而提高了粮食安全。在许多地区,农业实践导致生态系统被驯化的植物和动物所取代。这一基本过程创造了建造吉萨大金字塔和巴比伦悬空花园所需的食物资源。然而,这些食物生产系统也导致了爱尔兰马铃薯饥荒、北美大平原沙尘暴以及许多动物的灭绝。从这些辉煌的成功和失败中,我们认识到,粮食和环境安全需要一支熟练的劳动力队伍,解决复杂的问题往往需要新的创新。例如,在欧洲中世纪向 16 世纪过渡期间,欧洲农民了解到,从两块田轮作(一块播种,一块休耕或静养)到诺福克轮作(由小麦(Triticum aestivum)、芜菁(Brassica rapa)、大麦(Hordeum vulgare)和苜蓿(Trifolium)组成),粮食和经济安全得到了改善。随着时间的推移,我们也认识到,可持续的粮食生产需要仔细关注土壤和环境的健康。例如,20 世纪 30 年代的多年干旱加上北美大平原的耕地导致了 "沙尘暴"。基于上述及其他教训,我们假设,为了避免未来的粮食和经济不安全,我们需要一个考虑土壤、生态系统、人类和环境健康的共同愿景(D. E. Clay 等人,2012 年;Smart 等人,2015 年)。例如,北美大平原有多少土地用于生产一年生作物?不同的数据库得出了不同的答案(Lark 等人,2015 年,2017 年;Reitsma 等人,2016 年;美国农业部,2020 年;空间信息科学与系统中心,2024 年),而且一些研究论文的预测也未经验证,这使得这个问题的答案变得更加复杂。例如,Rashford 等人(2010 年)预测,如果玉米(Zea mays)的售价继续上涨,到 2011 年,北美草原洼地地区将有约 1210 万公顷(3000 万英亩)的草地转为种植作物。随后的分析表明,尽管价格上涨,但预测的大规模土地利用变化从未发生(Joshi 等人,2019 年;Lark 等人,2015 年;Wright & Wimberly,2013 年)。没有发生变化的原因是农民重视多种收入来源,他们的行为受到代代相传的家庭故事的影响(Joshi 等人,2019 年)。例如,经济学家可能会将 "边际 "定义为生产利润潜力低的土地,而土壤学家可能会将 "边际 "定义为侵蚀潜力高的土地。这意味着,"边际 "对不同的人有不同的含义,因此,它可能不是一个很好的比较基准(Csikós & Tóth, 2023)。一种分析方法被称为生命周期分析(LCA)(Sieverding 等人,2020 年)。在生命周期分析中,产品从摇篮到坟墓的生产过程中对温室气体的直接和间接影响相加得出一个分数。直接影响与生产特定产品的方法直接相关。例如,施肥排放了多少一氧化二氮或二氧化碳?而间接影响与产品的生产没有直接联系。这种分析方法存在的问题是,不同的模型会得出不同的分数,环境和生态健康可能没有被考虑在内,而且对于在生命周期评估计算中应包括哪些间接影响也没有达成共识。此外,生命周期评估模型可能不会考虑最新的科学发现(S. A. Clay 等人,2024 年),也不会考虑土壤和环境健康的变化。评估土壤侵蚀潜在影响的一种方法是美国农业部的土地能力分类(LCC)系统(Soil Conservation Service-USDA, 1961 年)。土地能力分类系统将土地分为八类,从 I 到 VIII 不等。I 类土地没有限制,而 LCC 值 II 至 VIII 可确定为与侵蚀 (e)、湿度 (w)、土壤 (s) 和气候 (c) 有关的限制。LCC 系统已被用于识别长期可持续性风险(Joshi 等人,2019 年;Lark 等人,2015 年;Rashford 等人,2010 年;Wright & Wimberly,2013 年)。
{"title":"Can the agricultural and environmental community agree on a pathway to food and environmental security?","authors":"David E. Clay, Nicholas J. Goeser, Jack Cornell","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21599","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21599","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since the dawn of agriculture, food security was improved by replacing hunting with domesticated animals and gathering was replaced with planting seeds in the soil. In many areas, agricultural practices resulted in ecological systems being replaced with domesticated plants and animals. This fundamental process created the food resources needed to build the Great Pyramid of Giza and the Hanging gardens of Babylon. However, these food production systems also contributed to the Irish potato famine, the North America Great Plains dust bowl, and the extinction of many animals. From these spectacular successes and failures, we learned that food and environmental security requires a skilled workforce and that new innovations are often needed to solve complex problems. For example, during the transition from the European Middle Age to the 16th century, European farmers learned that food and economic security was improved by switching from a two-field rotation (one seeded and one fallow or resting) to the Norfolk rotation that consisted of wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>), turnips (<i>Brassica rapa</i>), barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i>), and clover <i>(Trifolium</i>). This rotation increased productivity, improved diets, and provided the food needed for the industrial revolution.</p><p>Over time, we also learned that sustainable food production requires careful attention to soil and environmental health. For example, a multiyear drought during the 1930's when combined with the plowing of the North America Great Plains led to the “Dust Bowl”. Based on these and other lessons, we hypothesize that to avoid future food and economic insecurity, we need a common vision that considers soil, ecosystem, human, and environmental health (D. E. Clay et al., <span>2012</span>; Smart et al., <span>2015</span>).</p><p>Building a unified vision is complicated by scientific disagreements, social differences, and a lack of consensus on the fundamental facts. For example, how much land is used to produce annual crops in the North America Great Plains? The answer to this question is complicated by different databases producing different answers (Lark et al., <span>2015, 2017</span>; Reitsma et al., <span>2016</span>; USDA, <span>2020</span>; Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems, <span>2024</span>) and by research papers that make unvalidated predictions. For example, Rashford et al. (<span>2010</span>) predicted that in the Prairie Pothole region of North America, approximately 12.1 million ha (30 million acres) of grasslands would be converted to cultivated crops by 2011 if the corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) selling price continued to increase. Subsequent analysis showed that even though prices increased, the predicted wide-scale land use changes never occurred (Joshi et al., <span>2019</span>; Lark et al., <span>2015</span>; Wright & Wimberly, <span>2013</span>). The lack of change was attributed to farmers who valued multiple income streams and whose actions w","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21599","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141388193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tauana F. Almeida, Emily Robinson, Rashelle Matthiesen-Anderson, Alison E. Robertson, Andrea Basche
Later spring termination of fall-planted cover crops can result in more biomass production, which has the potential to improve environmental benefits. However, later cover crop termination can also have the potential to harm cash crops, such as through increases in corn seedling disease. With the objective of better understanding such potential competing interactions, we evaluated the impact of early and late termination timing of two cover crops—cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.)—on growth, seedling disease, and grain yield of corn in 2021 and 2022 in Nebraska. The total biomass production varied among treatments. Hairy vetch biomass was lower than cereal rye biomass at both termination times in 2021, but not different from cereal rye terminated early in 2022. Radicle root rot severity, a symptom of corn seedling disease, was not affected by cover crops in 2021. In 2022, however, radicle root rot was most severe in cereal rye terminated late treatments. Hairy vetch did not affect radicle root rot severity, regardless of termination time. Late termination of cereal rye resulted in a reduction in corn yield of 15.3% in 2021 and 76.1% in 2022 compared to no cover crop. Corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield was not affected following hairy vetch at either termination timing. Our results suggest that corn planted following late-terminated cereal rye can increase the severity of root rot and decrease corn grain yield; however, planting green into hairy vetch can be a successful option to increase biomass without increasing corn seedling disease or decreasing corn yield.
{"title":"Effect of cover crop species and termination timing on corn growth and seedling disease","authors":"Tauana F. Almeida, Emily Robinson, Rashelle Matthiesen-Anderson, Alison E. Robertson, Andrea Basche","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21601","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21601","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Later spring termination of fall-planted cover crops can result in more biomass production, which has the potential to improve environmental benefits. However, later cover crop termination can also have the potential to harm cash crops, such as through increases in corn seedling disease. With the objective of better understanding such potential competing interactions, we evaluated the impact of early and late termination timing of two cover crops—cereal rye (<i>Secale cereale</i> L.) and hairy vetch (<i>Vicia villosa</i> Roth.)—on growth, seedling disease, and grain yield of corn in 2021 and 2022 in Nebraska. The total biomass production varied among treatments. Hairy vetch biomass was lower than cereal rye biomass at both termination times in 2021, but not different from cereal rye terminated early in 2022. Radicle root rot severity, a symptom of corn seedling disease, was not affected by cover crops in 2021. In 2022, however, radicle root rot was most severe in cereal rye terminated late treatments. Hairy vetch did not affect radicle root rot severity, regardless of termination time. Late termination of cereal rye resulted in a reduction in corn yield of 15.3% in 2021 and 76.1% in 2022 compared to no cover crop. Corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) grain yield was not affected following hairy vetch at either termination timing. Our results suggest that corn planted following late-terminated cereal rye can increase the severity of root rot and decrease corn grain yield; however, planting green into hairy vetch can be a successful option to increase biomass without increasing corn seedling disease or decreasing corn yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21601","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141195956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ashley B. Jernigan, Jenny Kao-Kniffin, Sarah Pethybridge, Kyle Wickings
Soil biological processes are important drivers of crop productivity in agroecosystems. Soil microarthropods play key roles in nutrient cycling and plant nutrient acquisition, though little is known about how these effects manifest in crop production under different organic fertilizer amendments. We explored the interactive effects of microarthropods and fertilizers on crop productivity in two greenhouse experiments: experiment one involved a single Collembola species, and experiment two involved diverse microarthropod communities. Oats were grown as a model crop in both experiments under one of three initial fauna abundance levels (none, low, and high). In both experiments, four organic fertilization treatments were compared: alfalfa green manure, Kreher's Poultry Litter Compost, Chilean nitrate, and a nonamended control. Oat growth and development were evaluated weekly. During each experiment, 48 pots were selected randomly for destructive harvest at two separate times to mimic forage and grain harvest stages. At each harvest, multiple soil metrics (microarthropods, microbial biomass, microbial enzymes, and soil carbon and nitrogen) and plant metrics (biomass, reproduction, and tissue carbon and nitrogen content) were evaluated. Our findings indicated that microarthropods, both single species and diverse communities, stimulated nitrogen cycling and enhanced crop nutrient status. As microarthropod abundance and diversity increased, microarthropods exerted more effects on soil microbial activity. The effects of the microarthropods enhance the breakdown of fertilizers, ultimately making fertilizer choice less important for soil processes and plant nutrient availability. Our findings suggest that microarthropods drove oat production yields primarily through their effects on soil biological processes.
{"title":"Microarthropods improve oat nutritional quality and mediate fertilizer effects on soil biological activity","authors":"Ashley B. Jernigan, Jenny Kao-Kniffin, Sarah Pethybridge, Kyle Wickings","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21597","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21597","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil biological processes are important drivers of crop productivity in agroecosystems. Soil microarthropods play key roles in nutrient cycling and plant nutrient acquisition, though little is known about how these effects manifest in crop production under different organic fertilizer amendments. We explored the interactive effects of microarthropods and fertilizers on crop productivity in two greenhouse experiments: experiment one involved a single Collembola species, and experiment two involved diverse microarthropod communities. Oats were grown as a model crop in both experiments under one of three initial fauna abundance levels (none, low, and high). In both experiments, four organic fertilization treatments were compared: alfalfa green manure, Kreher's Poultry Litter Compost, Chilean nitrate, and a nonamended control. Oat growth and development were evaluated weekly. During each experiment, 48 pots were selected randomly for destructive harvest at two separate times to mimic forage and grain harvest stages. At each harvest, multiple soil metrics (microarthropods, microbial biomass, microbial enzymes, and soil carbon and nitrogen) and plant metrics (biomass, reproduction, and tissue carbon and nitrogen content) were evaluated. Our findings indicated that microarthropods, both single species and diverse communities, stimulated nitrogen cycling and enhanced crop nutrient status. As microarthropod abundance and diversity increased, microarthropods exerted more effects on soil microbial activity. The effects of the microarthropods enhance the breakdown of fertilizers, ultimately making fertilizer choice less important for soil processes and plant nutrient availability. Our findings suggest that microarthropods drove oat production yields primarily through their effects on soil biological processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21597","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141172245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Crop models are valuable tools for simulating and assessing genotype-by-environment interactions. In most studies, these models are parameterized based on crop data from a few sites and years, which often limits their applicability to a broader geographic context. Therefore, we utilize countrywide multi-environment variety trial data in this study to implement a genotype-specific model parameterization for winter rye (Secale cereale L.) in Germany. We use the Crop and Environment REsource Synthesis (CERES) model originally used for wheat available in the decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) framework and adapt and evaluate it for rye. Calibration and evaluation involved a comprehensive agronomic trial datasets for the rye cultivar Palazzo, encompassing 194 site-years of experiments covering various cereal production regions in Germany. The parameterization followed a structured approach, encompassing phenology, growth, and yield-specific coefficients. The parameterized CSM-CERES-Rye (where CSM is cropping system model) demonstrated reasonable accuracy in simulating critical crop parameters, including aboveground biomass, leaf area index, tiller, grain number, unit seed weight, and grain yield. The model is available for diverse model-based assessments of rye cultivation, including evaluating crop management, analyzing crop rotations, and assessing rye's suitability across varied environments, making it valuable for sustainable agriculture and decision-making.
{"title":"Comprehensive evaluation of the DSSAT-CSM-CERES-Wheat for simulating winter rye against multi-environment data in Germany","authors":"Ashifur Rahman Shawon, Emir Memic, Lorenz Kottmann, Ralf Uptmoor, Bernd Hackauf, Til Feike","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21590","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21590","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crop models are valuable tools for simulating and assessing genotype-by-environment interactions. In most studies, these models are parameterized based on crop data from a few sites and years, which often limits their applicability to a broader geographic context. Therefore, we utilize countrywide multi-environment variety trial data in this study to implement a genotype-specific model parameterization for winter rye (<i>Secale cereale</i> L.) in Germany. We use the Crop and Environment REsource Synthesis (CERES) model originally used for wheat available in the decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) framework and adapt and evaluate it for rye. Calibration and evaluation involved a comprehensive agronomic trial datasets for the rye cultivar Palazzo, encompassing 194 site-years of experiments covering various cereal production regions in Germany. The parameterization followed a structured approach, encompassing phenology, growth, and yield-specific coefficients. The parameterized CSM-CERES-Rye (where CSM is cropping system model) demonstrated reasonable accuracy in simulating critical crop parameters, including aboveground biomass, leaf area index, tiller, grain number, unit seed weight, and grain yield. The model is available for diverse model-based assessments of rye cultivation, including evaluating crop management, analyzing crop rotations, and assessing rye's suitability across varied environments, making it valuable for sustainable agriculture and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21590","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141172224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eduardo Fávero Caires, Angelo Rafael Bini, Vanderson Modolon Duart, Kaynnã da Silva Ricardo, Lucas Maurício Alves
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is highly efficient in the biological N2 fixation (BNF) process through the association of bacteria of the genus Bradyrhizobium in the root nodules of the plants. However, there are still doubts about the need to complement soybean N demand through N fertilization in high-yield environments. In addition, the real impact of co-inoculation of soybean with Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium spp. is not yet clear in such environments. A field experiment was conducted from 2012 to 2021 with six soybean cropping seasons in a crop rotation scheme with black oat (Avena strigosa Schreb), maize (Zea mays L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under no-till (NT) in Southern Brazil. Soybean seeds were co-inoculated with A. brasilense (strains Ab-V5 and Ab-V6) shortly after inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum, and different levels of N fertilization were used in top dressing at the start of pod formation (R3). Soybean nutritional status and grain yield were not benefited by co-inoculation with A. brasilense. Since the increased inoculum rate of A. brasilense co-inoculated with rhizobia in soybean compromised both N nutrition and grain yield, this practice should not be encouraged. There was no need to complement soybean N demand through N fertilization during the reproductive stage. Soybean achieved grain yields of 5.0–5.7 Mg ha−1 and, even so, there was no need to complement N demand through N fertilization. The results suggest that soybean N demand in a high-yielding environment under NT could be satisfied exclusively through the optimization of BNF.
{"title":"Co-inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense and late nitrogen fertilization for no-till soybean production","authors":"Eduardo Fávero Caires, Angelo Rafael Bini, Vanderson Modolon Duart, Kaynnã da Silva Ricardo, Lucas Maurício Alves","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21602","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21602","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] is highly efficient in the biological N<sub>2</sub> fixation (BNF) process through the association of bacteria of the genus <i>Bradyrhizobium</i> in the root nodules of the plants. However, there are still doubts about the need to complement soybean N demand through N fertilization in high-yield environments. In addition, the real impact of co-inoculation of soybean with <i>Azospirillum brasilense</i> and <i>Bradyrhizobium</i> spp. is not yet clear in such environments. A field experiment was conducted from 2012 to 2021 with six soybean cropping seasons in a crop rotation scheme with black oat (<i>Avena strigosa</i> Schreb), maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) under no-till (NT) in Southern Brazil. Soybean seeds were co-inoculated with <i>A. brasilense</i> (strains Ab-V5 and Ab-V6) shortly after inoculation with <i>B</i>radyrhizobium <i>japonicum</i>, and different levels of N fertilization were used in top dressing at the start of pod formation (R<sub>3</sub>). Soybean nutritional status and grain yield were not benefited by co-inoculation with <i>A. brasilense</i>. Since the increased inoculum rate of <i>A. brasilense</i> co-inoculated with rhizobia in soybean compromised both N nutrition and grain yield, this practice should not be encouraged. There was no need to complement soybean N demand through N fertilization during the reproductive stage. Soybean achieved grain yields of 5.0–5.7 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> and, even so, there was no need to complement N demand through N fertilization. The results suggest that soybean N demand in a high-yielding environment under NT could be satisfied exclusively through the optimization of BNF.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141099350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Raquel Balbo, Mónica Balzarini, Julia Carreras, María José Allende, Roxana Aguilar, Mercedes Silva, Marcos Karlin, Carolina Alvarez, María José Martínez
The environment to which a crop is exposed during the growing season has a significant impact on seed composition. The objectives of this study were to (1) estimate the contribution of genotype (G), environment (E), and their interaction (G × E) to the agronomic features and seed quality of chickpea and (2) identify climatic variables that significantly affect chickpea nutritional composition. A total of 10 pre-commercial and commercial cultivars of Cicer arietinum L. were evaluated in 15 environments in Argentina. Average plant height ranged between 44.7 and 55.2 cm, 100-seed weight was 38 and 27 g, and grain yield was 750 and 1500 kg ha−1 for kabuli and desi chickpea, respectively. The results obtained from the variance component analysis showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) contributions of the effects of G, E, and G × E interaction on the nutritional quality of chickpea seeds. Protein, carbohydrates, and mineral content were mostly affected by E, whereas oil content was G-dependent. Only tocopherols were affected by G × E interaction. The total phenotypic variance is mostly composed of environmental effects captured during the seed filling period. High mean daily air temperature had a negative effect on carbohydrates and increased protein and mineral content. The fatty acid profile and gamma tocopherol contents were affected by accumulated precipitation and evapotranspiration. Air humidity was negatively correlated with protein content and iodine value. Results from this research are useful for breeders to broaden the genetic background of chickpea genotypes and for farmers to identify climatic conditions that impact grain quality.
作物在生长季节所处的环境对种子成分有重大影响。本研究的目的是:(1) 评估基因型(G)、环境(E)及其交互作用(G × E)对鹰嘴豆农艺特征和种子质量的贡献;(2) 确定对鹰嘴豆营养成分有显著影响的气候变量。在阿根廷的 15 种环境中,共对 10 个 Cicer arietinum L. 的商品前和商品栽培品种进行了评估。卡布利鹰嘴豆和德西鹰嘴豆的平均株高介于 44.7 厘米和 55.2 厘米之间,百粒重分别为 38 克和 27 克,每公顷谷物产量分别为 750 千克和 1500 千克。变异成分分析结果表明,G、E 和 G × E 交互作用对鹰嘴豆种子营养质量的影响具有显著的统计学意义(p < 0.05)。蛋白质、碳水化合物和矿物质含量主要受 E 的影响,而油含量则取决于 G。只有生育酚受 G × E 相互作用的影响。总的表型变异主要由种子灌浆期的环境影响组成。日平均气温高对碳水化合物有负面影响,而蛋白质和矿物质含量则有所增加。脂肪酸和γ生育酚含量受累积降水量和蒸散量的影响。空气湿度与蛋白质含量和碘值呈负相关。这项研究的结果有助于育种者扩大鹰嘴豆基因型的遗传背景,也有助于农民确定影响谷物品质的气候条件。
{"title":"Nutritional quality of kabuli and desi chickpea in Argentina: Effects of environment","authors":"Raquel Balbo, Mónica Balzarini, Julia Carreras, María José Allende, Roxana Aguilar, Mercedes Silva, Marcos Karlin, Carolina Alvarez, María José Martínez","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21580","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21580","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The environment to which a crop is exposed during the growing season has a significant impact on seed composition. The objectives of this study were to (1) estimate the contribution of genotype (G), environment (E), and their interaction (G × E) to the agronomic features and seed quality of chickpea and (2) identify climatic variables that significantly affect chickpea nutritional composition. A total of 10 pre-commercial and commercial cultivars of <i>Cicer arietinum</i> L. were evaluated in 15 environments in Argentina. Average plant height ranged between 44.7 and 55.2 cm, 100-seed weight was 38 and 27 g, and grain yield was 750 and 1500 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for kabuli and desi chickpea, respectively. The results obtained from the variance component analysis showed statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) contributions of the effects of G, E, and G × E interaction on the nutritional quality of chickpea seeds. Protein, carbohydrates, and mineral content were mostly affected by E, whereas oil content was G-dependent. Only tocopherols were affected by G × E interaction. The total phenotypic variance is mostly composed of environmental effects captured during the seed filling period. High mean daily air temperature had a negative effect on carbohydrates and increased protein and mineral content. The fatty acid profile and gamma tocopherol contents were affected by accumulated precipitation and evapotranspiration. Air humidity was negatively correlated with protein content and iodine value. Results from this research are useful for breeders to broaden the genetic background of chickpea genotypes and for farmers to identify climatic conditions that impact grain quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141103320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Caitlyn B. Lawton, John L. Snider, Peng W. Chee, Sarah T. Hobby, Phillip M. Roberts, Amrit Pokhrel, Joshua M. Lee, Gurpreet K. Virk, Lavesta C. Hand
This study quantifies the effects of wide row spacing on lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). An experiment was conducted in Tifton, GA in 2021 and 2022, where cotton was planted in six replications of 91-, 122-, 152-, and 183-cm row spacings. Following defoliation, 1.8 m was hand harvested from each plot, and boll density plant−1 and density ha−1 were determined for sympodial and monopodial branches. Additional measurements included fruit and lint yield distribution assessments and intra-boll yield components including seed cotton weight boll−1, seed index, seed boll−1, lint weight seed−1, seed surface area (SSA), fiber density, and single fiber weight. Lint yield was reduced 20% in the 183-cm row spacing compared to the 91-cm row spacing. The 91-cm rows had the lowest number of sympodial bolls plant−1 with 152- and 183-cm rows demonstrating a 24%–28% increase in sympodial bolls plant−1. Sympodial bolls ha−1 were reduced 22% in the 183-cm row spacing compared to the 91-cm row spacing. There were no differences in bolls ha−1 or lint yield ha−1 with respect to monopodial growth. There were no differences in seed cotton weight boll−1, seeds boll−1, fiber density, single fiber weight, or turnout. Seed index and SSA were increased in the 183-cm row spacing. Lint weight seed−1 was reduced in the 91-cm row spacing.
{"title":"Impacts of wide row spacings on yield and yield components of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)","authors":"Caitlyn B. Lawton, John L. Snider, Peng W. Chee, Sarah T. Hobby, Phillip M. Roberts, Amrit Pokhrel, Joshua M. Lee, Gurpreet K. Virk, Lavesta C. Hand","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21579","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21579","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study quantifies the effects of wide row spacing on lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality of upland cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.). An experiment was conducted in Tifton, GA in 2021 and 2022, where cotton was planted in six replications of 91-, 122-, 152-, and 183-cm row spacings. Following defoliation, 1.8 m was hand harvested from each plot, and boll density plant<sup>−1</sup> and density ha<sup>−1</sup> were determined for sympodial and monopodial branches. Additional measurements included fruit and lint yield distribution assessments and intra-boll yield components including seed cotton weight boll<sup>−1</sup>, seed index, seed boll<sup>−1</sup>, lint weight seed<sup>−1</sup>, seed surface area (SSA), fiber density, and single fiber weight. Lint yield was reduced 20% in the 183-cm row spacing compared to the 91-cm row spacing. The 91-cm rows had the lowest number of sympodial bolls plant<sup>−1</sup> with 152- and 183-cm rows demonstrating a 24%–28% increase in sympodial bolls plant<sup>−1</sup>. Sympodial bolls ha<sup>−1</sup> were reduced 22% in the 183-cm row spacing compared to the 91-cm row spacing. There were no differences in bolls ha<sup>−1</sup> or lint yield ha<sup>−1</sup> with respect to monopodial growth. There were no differences in seed cotton weight boll<sup>−1</sup>, seeds boll<sup>−1</sup>, fiber density, single fiber weight, or turnout. Seed index and SSA were increased in the 183-cm row spacing. Lint weight seed<sup>−1</sup> was reduced in the 91-cm row spacing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21579","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141105878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Researchers have extensively studied and documented the effects of potassium (K) fertility on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Yet, additional research is needed to determine how interactions of K, cultivar, and harvest management influence the K needs of alfalfa. To explore these interactions, we conducted 5 years of field research at the University of Wyoming James C. Hageman Sustainable Agriculture Research and Extension Center in Lingle, WY. Treatments were (a) four K rates (0, 56, 112, and 168 kg K2O ha−1 year−1) applied before planting in the fall of 2016 and after the final harvest in the fall of 2017–2020, (b) two cultivars (Hi-Gest 360 and AFX 457), and (c) two harvest times (early harvest, late bud to early [10%] bloom, and late harvest, 7 days after early harvest), arranged in a 4 × 2 × 2 factorial under random complete blocks with four replications. At 168 kg K2O ha−1 year−1 and early harvest, a consistently significant (p < 0.05) higher yield response was observed. The same response was seen at 112 kg K2O ha−1 year−1 and late harvest. This occurred at a site with moderate-to-high soil K levels throughout the study period. There was a linear (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.66) and quadratic (p = 0.006, R2 = 0.61) response of forage accumulation to K rate at early and late harvest, respectively. Similar trends were also seen for stem count, relative water content, root uptake of K, and tissue K. Time of harvest showed immense potential for optimizing K's effect for a consistent high-yield response. However, fertilizing alfalfa with 112 kg K2O ha−1 year−1 gave the most profitable production under both harvest times. If K fertilizer prices drop over time, high profits could be attained with higher K fertilization rates. After 3 years of production, average forage accumulation increased under an early harvest system and decreased under a late harvest system. Growers in Wyoming and similar regions are encouraged to consider fertilizing alfalfa with moderate K rates (∼112 kg K2O ha−1 year−1) on soils testing moderate-to-high in soil test K, implement a late harvest system for the first 3 years after planting, and transition to an early harvest system after the initial 3 years to maximize alfalfa profits.
研究人员广泛研究并记录了钾(K)肥力对紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)的影响。然而,还需要更多的研究来确定钾、栽培品种和收获管理之间的相互作用如何影响紫花苜蓿对钾的需求。为了探索这些相互作用,我们在怀俄明州林格尔的怀俄明大学 James C. Hageman 可持续农业研究与推广中心进行了为期 5 年的实地研究。处理为:(a)2016 年秋季播种前和 2017-2020 年秋季最后收获后施用四种 K 率(0、56、112 和 168 kg K2O ha-1 year-1);(b)两种栽培品种(Hi-Gest 360 和 AFX 457);(c)两种收获时间(早期收获,花蕾晚期至开花初期 [10%] ;晚期收获,早期收获后 7 天),采用随机完全区组的 4 × 2 × 2 因式排列,四次重复。在 168 kg K2O ha-1 year-1 和早期收获条件下,观察到产量持续显著提高(p < 0.05)。在 112 kg K2O ha-1 year-1 和晚收条件下也出现了同样的反应。这发生在整个研究期间土壤钾含量处于中高水平的地点。在早期和晚期收获时,牧草累积量对钾含量分别有线性(p < 0.001,R2 = 0.66)和二次性(p = 0.006,R2 = 0.61)响应。茎杆数、相对含水量、根对钾的吸收和组织钾也呈现出类似的趋势。不过,在两个收获期,苜蓿每年每公顷施用 112 千克 K2O 肥料的收益最高。如果钾肥价格随着时间推移而下降,那么提高钾肥施用量就能获得高利润。经过 3 年的生产,早收系统下的平均牧草积蓄量增加,晚收系统下的平均牧草积蓄量减少。我们鼓励怀俄明州和类似地区的种植者考虑在土壤测试钾含量中等至偏高的土壤上以适度的钾肥施肥量(∼112 kg K2O ha-1 year-1)种植紫花苜蓿,在种植后的前 3 年采用晚收方式,并在最初的 3 年后过渡到早收方式,以实现紫花苜蓿的利润最大化。
{"title":"Potassium and harvest time interaction effect on alfalfa production and profitability","authors":"Michael M. Baidoo, M. Anowarul Islam","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21575","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21575","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Researchers have extensively studied and documented the effects of potassium (K) fertility on alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.). Yet, additional research is needed to determine how interactions of K, cultivar, and harvest management influence the K needs of alfalfa. To explore these interactions, we conducted 5 years of field research at the University of Wyoming James C. Hageman Sustainable Agriculture Research and Extension Center in Lingle, WY. Treatments were (a) four K rates (0, 56, 112, and 168 kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) applied before planting in the fall of 2016 and after the final harvest in the fall of 2017–2020, (b) two cultivars (Hi-Gest 360 and AFX 457), and (c) two harvest times (early harvest, late bud to early [10%] bloom, and late harvest, 7 days after early harvest), arranged in a 4 × 2 × 2 factorial under random complete blocks with four replications. At 168 kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> and early harvest, a consistently significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) higher yield response was observed. The same response was seen at 112 kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> and late harvest. This occurred at a site with moderate-to-high soil K levels throughout the study period. There was a linear (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.66) and quadratic (<i>p</i> = 0.006, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.61) response of forage accumulation to K rate at early and late harvest, respectively. Similar trends were also seen for stem count, relative water content, root uptake of K, and tissue K. Time of harvest showed immense potential for optimizing K's effect for a consistent high-yield response. However, fertilizing alfalfa with 112 kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> gave the most profitable production under both harvest times. If K fertilizer prices drop over time, high profits could be attained with higher K fertilization rates. After 3 years of production, average forage accumulation increased under an early harvest system and decreased under a late harvest system. Growers in Wyoming and similar regions are encouraged to consider fertilizing alfalfa with moderate K rates (∼112 kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) on soils testing moderate-to-high in soil test K, implement a late harvest system for the first 3 years after planting, and transition to an early harvest system after the initial 3 years to maximize alfalfa profits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141062032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
An additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model is used to explore the genotype × environment interaction (GEI) in complete multi-environmental trials. This model orders genotypes (G) according to their performance across environments (E) on a vectorial plane generated by the first two axes of a principal component analysis (AMMI-biplot). Alternatively, interaction terms can be regarded as random effects, which can be predicted from linear mixed models using a factor analytic (FA) covariance structure for the GEI terms. Here, an FA-biplot was obtained by plotting the G and E scores derived from the FA mixed model with complete and incomplete data. The aim of this work was to compare AMMI-biplot with FA-biplot for balanced data and then show the impact of the imbalance on the FA-biplot. The G ordinations were assessed in four scenarios generated using datasets of 3 consecutive years obtained from comparative wheat trials conducted under a complete random block design in different environments across the Argentine network of cultivar assessment. For each scenario, G with the lowest performance in the third year were deleted, one by one, from all sites to generate a scenario with missing G. Although we used different statistical procedures to obtain AMMI-biplot and FA-biplot, they showed the same interaction pattern in the case of up to 50% of G dropped from all E in the last year of the multiyear trials. We conclude that the FA-biplot yields a robust G ordination even when with incomplete datasets.
在完整的多环境试验中,采用加法主效应和乘法交互作用(AMMI)模型来探索基因型与环境的交互作用(GEI)。该模型根据基因型(G)在主成分分析(AMMI-biplot)前两个轴生成的矢量平面上不同环境(E)中的表现对基因型(G)进行排序。另外,交互作用项也可被视为随机效应,可通过线性混合模型使用因子分析(FA)协方差结构对 GEI 项进行预测。在这里,通过绘制完整和不完整数据的 FA 混合模型得出的 G 和 E 分数,得到了 FA 双曲线图。这项工作的目的是将 AMMI-biplot 与平衡数据的 FA-biplot 进行比较,然后显示不平衡对 FA-biplot 的影响。在阿根廷栽培品种评估网络的不同环境中,采用完全随机区组设计进行了小麦比较试验,利用连续 3 年获得的数据集生成了四种情景,对 G 排序进行了评估。虽然我们使用了不同的统计程序来获得 AMMI-双图和 FA-双图,但它们在多年试验的最后一年从所有 E 中删除多达 50%的 G 的情况下显示出相同的交互模式。我们的结论是,即使在数据集不完整的情况下,FA-biplot 也能得到可靠的 G 排序。
{"title":"Comparison of additive main effect–multiplicative interaction model and factor analytic model for genotypes ordination from multi-environment trials","authors":"Cecilia I. Bruno, Mónica Balzarini","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21591","DOIUrl":"10.1002/agj2.21591","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model is used to explore the genotype × environment interaction (GEI) in complete multi-environmental trials. This model orders genotypes (G) according to their performance across environments (E) on a vectorial plane generated by the first two axes of a principal component analysis (AMMI-biplot). Alternatively, interaction terms can be regarded as random effects, which can be predicted from linear mixed models using a factor analytic (FA) covariance structure for the GEI terms. Here, an FA-biplot was obtained by plotting the G and E scores derived from the FA mixed model with complete and incomplete data. The aim of this work was to compare AMMI-biplot with FA-biplot for balanced data and then show the impact of the imbalance on the FA-biplot. The G ordinations were assessed in four scenarios generated using datasets of 3 consecutive years obtained from comparative wheat trials conducted under a complete random block design in different environments across the Argentine network of cultivar assessment. For each scenario, G with the lowest performance in the third year were deleted, one by one, from all sites to generate a scenario with missing G. Although we used different statistical procedures to obtain AMMI-biplot and FA-biplot, they showed the same interaction pattern in the case of up to 50% of G dropped from all E in the last year of the multiyear trials. We conclude that the FA-biplot yields a robust G ordination even when with incomplete datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140967328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}