American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine最新文献

Rationale: Diaphragm muscle weakness might underlie persistent exertional dyspnea, despite normal lung and cardiac function in individuals who were previously hospitalized for acute coronavirus disease (COVID-19) illness. Objectives: The authors sought, first, to determine the persistence and pathophysiological nature of diaphragm muscle weakness and its association with exertional dyspnea 2 years after hospitalization for COVID-19 and, second, to investigate the impact of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on diaphragm and inspiratory muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea in individuals with long COVID. Methods: Approximately 2 years after hospitalization for COVID-19, 30 individuals (11 women, 19 men; median age, 58 years; interquartile range [IQR] = 51-63) underwent comprehensive (invasive) respiratory muscle assessment and evaluation of dyspnea. Eighteen with persistent diaphragm muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea were randomized to 6 weeks of IMT or sham training; assessments were repeated immediately after and 6 weeks after IMT completion. The primary endpoint was change in inspiratory muscle fatiguability immediately after IMT. Measurements and Main Results: At a median of 31 months (IQR = 23-32) after hospitalization, 21 of 30 individuals reported relevant persistent exertional dyspnea. Diaphragm muscle weakness on exertion and reduced diaphragm cortical activation were potentially related to exertional dyspnea. Compared with sham control, IMT improved diaphragm and inspiratory muscle function (sniff transdiaphragmatic pressure, 83 cm H₂O [IQR = 75-91] vs. 100 cm H₂O [IQR = 81-113], P = 0.02), inspiratory muscle fatiguability (time to task failure, 365 s [IQR = 284-701] vs. 983 s [IQR = 551-1,494], P = 0.05), diaphragm voluntary activation index (79% [IQR = 63-92] vs. 89% [IQR = 75-94], P = 0.03), and dyspnea (Borg score, 7 [IQR = 5.5-8] vs. 6 [IQR = 4-7], P = 0.03). Improvements persisted for 6 weeks after IMT completion. Conclusions: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to identify a potential treatment for persisting exertional dyspnea in long COVID and provide a possible pathophysiological explanation for the treatment benefit. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04854863, NCT05582642).

Rationale: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary events. In the Phase III, 52-week ETHOS trial (NCT02465567), triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) reduced rates of moderate/severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality versus dual therapy with glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) or budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF). However, the effect of BGF on cardiovascular events versus GFF remains unevaluated. Further, the effect of BGF on time to first severe exacerbation has not been reported. Objective: Assess the effects of BGF 320/18/9.6 μg (BGF 320) and other ICS-containing arms on cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary endpoints versus GFF in patients with COPD from ETHOS. Methods: Patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and a history of exacerbations were randomized to twice-daily BGF 320, BGF 160/18/9.6 μg, BFF 320/9.6 μg, or GFF 18/9.6 µg (GFF). Time to first severe COPD exacerbation was a pre-specified endpoint; post-hoc cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary endpoints included time to first major adverse cardiac event (MACE), time to first cardiovascular adverse event (AE) of special interest (CVAESI), time to first cardiac AE, and time to the composite endpoint of first severe cardiopulmonary event. Measurements and Main Results: BGF 320 reduced the rate of first occurrence (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) of cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary events versus GFF, including for CVAESI (0.63 [0.48, 0.82]), cardiac AE (0.60 [0.48, 0.76]), and severe cardiopulmonary event (0.80 [0.67, 0.95]). Conclusions: BGF had a benefit on cardiovascular endpoints and severe cardiopulmonary events versus GFF in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.