Since the first paravertebral blockade was carried out by Sellheim in 1905, this method has proved effective for the isolated blockade of spinal nerves. The efficacy of preoperative intercostal blockade (ICB) in combination with neuroleptanalgesia (NLA) or Pentothal-pentazocine-N2O anesthesia (Pe-Pz) was studied (unilateral analgesia for cholecystectomy). Group 1: NLA; group 2: NLA with ICB; group 3: Pe-Pz; group 4: Pe-Pz with ICB. The analgesic requirement differed significantly between groups 1 (0.33 mg fentanyl) and 2 (0.15 mg fentanyl) and groups 3 (63.5 mg pentazocine) and 4 (31.5 mg pentazocine). There were also significant differences in circulatory responses. The maximum deviation from the initial value at the beginning of the operation in group 1 compared to group 2 was pulse rate + 28.7% vs + 2.4%, mean arterial pressure (Part) + 24.6% vs + 3.1%, and systolic pressure (Psyst) + 33% vs +/- 0%; group 3 compared to group 4: pulse rate + 16.4% vs + 3.2%, Part + 24.5% vs 0.0%, and Psyst + 26.5% vs + 196. The times of action of ICB extended from 7.54 h to 11.33 h for partial analgeisa, time to the first dose of analgesic from 12.3 h to 16.9 h (etidocaine 0.5% and 1% respectively without and with epinephrine). The mean blood levels after 100 mg bupivacaine-CO2 rose to 1.16 micrograms/ml after 5 min and reached a maximum after 15 min (1.29 micrograms/ml) as compared to 0.98 micrograms/ml after addition of ornithine-vasopressin. These values are very much higher than those after the use of bupivacaine-HCl solution. Etidocaine and bupivacaine-HCl have comparable durations of analgesia. Toxicologically, both substances can be applied safely with consideration of all pharmacological data for ICB. Of a total of 3,485 intercostal blockades, 2,775 were applied perioperatively (pre- and postoperatively); 265 were carried out for trauma patients (rib fractures) and 445 for therapeutic indications (herpes zoster neuralgia, tumor pain, costovertebral pain). In 8 blocks 10% ammonium sulfate, in 4 blocks absolute alcohol, and in 19 blocks 5% phenol were used for neurolysis. In 2 cases a marginal pneumothorax was seen, which was resorbed spontaneously (0.06%). Altogether 16,270 single intercostal nerves were blocked. Single-session intercostal blockade can be combined as unilateral analgesia with general anesthesia. This combination is characterized by stable circulatory conditions with avoidance of hypertensive reactions. The long-lasting analgesia allows early mobilization and physiotherapy both postoperatively and posttraumatically in patients with unilateral thoracic and abdominal pain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
自1905年Sellheim首次进行椎旁阻断以来,这种方法已被证明对孤立的脊神经阻断是有效的。研究术前肋间阻滞(ICB)联合神经轻镇痛(NLA)或戊二酮-戊氮唑-二氮麻醉(Pe-Pz)(单侧胆囊切除术镇痛)的疗效。第一组:NLA;第二组:NLA合并ICB;第三组:Pe-Pz;第4组:含ICB的Pe-Pz。组1 (0.33 mg芬太尼)、组2 (0.15 mg芬太尼)和组3 (63.5 mg戊唑嗪)、组4 (31.5 mg戊唑嗪)镇痛需求差异显著。两组在循环反应方面也有显著差异。与2组相比,1组与手术开始时初始值的最大偏差为脉搏率+ 28.7% vs + 2.4%,平均动脉压(Part) + 24.6% vs + 3.1%,收缩压(Psyst) + 33% vs +/- 0%;第3组与第4组比较:脉搏率+ 16.4% vs + 3.2%, Part + 24.5% vs 0.0%, Psyst + 26.5% vs + 196。局部镇痛时,ICB的作用时间从7.54 h延长至11.33 h,到第一次镇痛时间从12.3 h延长至16.9 h(分别为0.5%艾蒂多卡因和1%艾蒂多卡因,不加肾上腺素和加肾上腺素)。加100mg布比卡因- co2后,5分钟后平均血药浓度上升到1.16微克/毫升,15分钟后达到最高值(1.29微克/毫升),而加鸟氨酸-加压素后,平均血药浓度为0.98微克/毫升。这些值比使用盐酸布比卡因溶液后的值要高得多。艾蒂多卡因和盐酸布比卡因的镇痛持续时间相当。从毒理学上讲,考虑到ICB的所有药理学数据,这两种物质都可以安全使用。在总共3,485例肋间阻滞中,2,775例围手术期(术前和术后)应用;265例为外伤患者(肋骨骨折),445例为治疗指征(带状疱疹神经痛、肿瘤痛、脊柱痛)。8组使用10%硫酸铵,4组使用无水乙醇,19组使用5%苯酚进行神经松解。2例有边缘性气胸,可自发吸收(0.06%)。共有16270条肋间神经被阻断。单次肋间阻滞可作为单侧镇痛与全身麻醉联合应用。这种组合的特点是稳定的循环条件,避免高血压反应。长效镇痛使单侧胸腹疼痛患者术后和创伤后早期活动和物理治疗成为可能。(摘要删节为400字)
{"title":"[The single intercostal block--surgical and therapeutic indications].","authors":"H C Niesel, L Klimpel, H Kaiser, S al-Rafai","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the first paravertebral blockade was carried out by Sellheim in 1905, this method has proved effective for the isolated blockade of spinal nerves. The efficacy of preoperative intercostal blockade (ICB) in combination with neuroleptanalgesia (NLA) or Pentothal-pentazocine-N2O anesthesia (Pe-Pz) was studied (unilateral analgesia for cholecystectomy). Group 1: NLA; group 2: NLA with ICB; group 3: Pe-Pz; group 4: Pe-Pz with ICB. The analgesic requirement differed significantly between groups 1 (0.33 mg fentanyl) and 2 (0.15 mg fentanyl) and groups 3 (63.5 mg pentazocine) and 4 (31.5 mg pentazocine). There were also significant differences in circulatory responses. The maximum deviation from the initial value at the beginning of the operation in group 1 compared to group 2 was pulse rate + 28.7% vs + 2.4%, mean arterial pressure (Part) + 24.6% vs + 3.1%, and systolic pressure (Psyst) + 33% vs +/- 0%; group 3 compared to group 4: pulse rate + 16.4% vs + 3.2%, Part + 24.5% vs 0.0%, and Psyst + 26.5% vs + 196. The times of action of ICB extended from 7.54 h to 11.33 h for partial analgeisa, time to the first dose of analgesic from 12.3 h to 16.9 h (etidocaine 0.5% and 1% respectively without and with epinephrine). The mean blood levels after 100 mg bupivacaine-CO2 rose to 1.16 micrograms/ml after 5 min and reached a maximum after 15 min (1.29 micrograms/ml) as compared to 0.98 micrograms/ml after addition of ornithine-vasopressin. These values are very much higher than those after the use of bupivacaine-HCl solution. Etidocaine and bupivacaine-HCl have comparable durations of analgesia. Toxicologically, both substances can be applied safely with consideration of all pharmacological data for ICB. Of a total of 3,485 intercostal blockades, 2,775 were applied perioperatively (pre- and postoperatively); 265 were carried out for trauma patients (rib fractures) and 445 for therapeutic indications (herpes zoster neuralgia, tumor pain, costovertebral pain). In 8 blocks 10% ammonium sulfate, in 4 blocks absolute alcohol, and in 19 blocks 5% phenol were used for neurolysis. In 2 cases a marginal pneumothorax was seen, which was resorbed spontaneously (0.06%). Altogether 16,270 single intercostal nerves were blocked. Single-session intercostal blockade can be combined as unilateral analgesia with general anesthesia. This combination is characterized by stable circulatory conditions with avoidance of hypertensive reactions. The long-lasting analgesia allows early mobilization and physiotherapy both postoperatively and posttraumatically in patients with unilateral thoracic and abdominal pain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13786787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Success rates and complications were studied in 178 patients scheduled for brachial block. METHODS. Patients of both sexes aged 9 to 79 years received axillary blocks in order to permit typical surgical procedures of the hand an forearm. The block was performed using the transarterial method described be Dejong. Half of the local anesthetic was administered anterior to and half posterior to the axillary artery. The incidence of successful blocks, latency time, and systemic complications were investigated; 14 days after the blocks, motor function and sensation were examined in order to evaluate the local neurological status. RESULTS. The rate of successful blocks averaged 79% using 40 ml 1% mepivacaine after 12 min latency; this rate was increased to 89% by administering a further 20 ml 1% mepivacaine. Disagreeable sensations from the operative field occurred in 5% and mild symptoms of cerebral toxicity in 2.8% of cases; 1.6% of patients had cardiovascular disturbances such as hypotension or arrhythmias. Local complications such as hematomas were found in 17.5% local pain in the axillary region in 15%, and long-lasting paresthesias in 12% of cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The 90% rate of successful blocks is comparable to the range of 86-98% presented in the literature. The success rate depends on the definition of successful block, the experience of the anesthetist, and the volume and concentration of the anesthetic solution administered. The incidence of systemic cardiovascular complications was similar to that in the literature, but we observed fewer symptoms of cerebral toxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对178例臂丛阻滞患者的成功率和并发症进行了研究。方法。9至79岁的男女患者均接受腋窝阻滞,以便进行典型的手部和前臂手术。采用Dejong经动脉方法进行阻滞。局部麻醉一半在腋窝动脉前,一半在腋窝动脉后。研究成功阻滞的发生率、潜伏期和全身并发症;阻滞14天后,检查运动功能和感觉,以评估局部神经系统状况。结果。使用40 ml 1%甲哌卡因12 min后阻滞成功率平均为79%;再注射20毫升1%甲哌卡因,这一比率增加到89%。术野不良感觉发生率为5%,轻度脑毒性症状发生率为2.8%;1.6%的患者有心血管疾病,如低血压或心律失常。局部并发症如血肿占17.5%,腋窝区局部疼痛占15%,持久的感觉异常占12%。讨论和结论。90%的区块成功率与文献报道的86-98%的范围相当。成功率取决于成功阻滞的定义,麻醉师的经验,以及麻醉溶液的体积和浓度。系统性心血管并发症的发生率与文献相似,但我们观察到较少的脑毒性症状。(摘要删节250字)
{"title":"[The axillary brachial plexus block. A study of 178 patients].","authors":"H J Hartung, A Rupprecht","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Success rates and complications were studied in 178 patients scheduled for brachial block. METHODS. Patients of both sexes aged 9 to 79 years received axillary blocks in order to permit typical surgical procedures of the hand an forearm. The block was performed using the transarterial method described be Dejong. Half of the local anesthetic was administered anterior to and half posterior to the axillary artery. The incidence of successful blocks, latency time, and systemic complications were investigated; 14 days after the blocks, motor function and sensation were examined in order to evaluate the local neurological status. RESULTS. The rate of successful blocks averaged 79% using 40 ml 1% mepivacaine after 12 min latency; this rate was increased to 89% by administering a further 20 ml 1% mepivacaine. Disagreeable sensations from the operative field occurred in 5% and mild symptoms of cerebral toxicity in 2.8% of cases; 1.6% of patients had cardiovascular disturbances such as hypotension or arrhythmias. Local complications such as hematomas were found in 17.5% local pain in the axillary region in 15%, and long-lasting paresthesias in 12% of cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The 90% rate of successful blocks is comparable to the range of 86-98% presented in the literature. The success rate depends on the definition of successful block, the experience of the anesthetist, and the volume and concentration of the anesthetic solution administered. The incidence of systemic cardiovascular complications was similar to that in the literature, but we observed fewer symptoms of cerebral toxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14056053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia has frequently proved advantageous because of its long and safe analgesia, good motor blockade and low incidence of side-effects. Significant prolongation of analgesia is possible with an epinephrine concentration of as low as 1:200,000 added to bupivacain 0.5%, while optimal prolongation can be achieved by a concentration of 1:100,000. The addition of 1:50,000 epinephrine, however, does not induce any further enhancement. These results are contrary to those of Chambers and Scott, whose short durations of action were possibly due to relative overdosage of epinephrine with a paradoxical reduction of action. The latency period until complete blockade is achieved can be reduced by high epinephrine concentrations (beginning with 1:50,000), a fact which is possibly due to a direct, receptor-induced mechanism of epinephrine. The motor blockade of ankle and toe joints beginning from a concentration of 1:100,000 epinephrine is also prolonged significantly. With all epinephrine concentrations, the overall duration of analgesia could be prolonged significantly, in contrast to the overall duration of motor blockade. Only with free bupivacaine solution did motor and sensory function return at more or less the same time. The period between the beginning and the end of regression for both sensation and motor function was influenced only by the highest epinephrine concentration (1:50,000).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
{"title":"[Epinephrine in spinal anesthesia].","authors":"H Nolte, A Kraus","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia has frequently proved advantageous because of its long and safe analgesia, good motor blockade and low incidence of side-effects. Significant prolongation of analgesia is possible with an epinephrine concentration of as low as 1:200,000 added to bupivacain 0.5%, while optimal prolongation can be achieved by a concentration of 1:100,000. The addition of 1:50,000 epinephrine, however, does not induce any further enhancement. These results are contrary to those of Chambers and Scott, whose short durations of action were possibly due to relative overdosage of epinephrine with a paradoxical reduction of action. The latency period until complete blockade is achieved can be reduced by high epinephrine concentrations (beginning with 1:50,000), a fact which is possibly due to a direct, receptor-induced mechanism of epinephrine. The motor blockade of ankle and toe joints beginning from a concentration of 1:100,000 epinephrine is also prolonged significantly. With all epinephrine concentrations, the overall duration of analgesia could be prolonged significantly, in contrast to the overall duration of motor blockade. Only with free bupivacaine solution did motor and sensory function return at more or less the same time. The period between the beginning and the end of regression for both sensation and motor function was influenced only by the highest epinephrine concentration (1:50,000).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14351586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Unlabelled: The efficacy of conduction anesthesia depends to a great extent on accurate application of the local anesthetic solution (LA) in close proximity to the nerve trunk. The problem with most peripheral nerve stimulators available in the past was that they did not provide a small enough electrical stimulus. Correct positioning of the needle could not be guaranteed if muscle contractions occurred. New current-controlled stimulators have recently been developed with low currents from 0.1 mA upwards. We studied the intensity of stimulus currents eliciting just-visible muscle contractions in the lower leg (m. triceps surae) to see how this influenced the latency and success rate of sciatic nerve block.
Method: In a randomized study, 35 patients (18-68 years, ASA I and II) undergoing elective surgery were investigated. The block was performed by posterior approach using 30 ml 1% prilocaine. The stimulator was switched on with a frequency of 1 impulse/s and a stimulus current of 1 mA when the insulated needle was at a depth of 4 cm. In group 1 (n = 5) LA was injected when the first visible muscle contractions occurred at a current of 1.0 mA, but vanished if the current was diminished. In group 2 (n = 10) the needle was placed if a minimum current of 0.5 mA just triggered a muscular response. In group 3 (n = 10) the threshold current was 0.3 mA and in group 4 (n = 10) 0.1 mA. In all cases direct contact between the needle tip and the nerve was avoided.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
{"title":"[Influence of minimum current for peripheral nerve stimulation on the latency and success rate of sciatic blockade].","authors":"H Kaiser, H C Niesel, L Klimpel","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The efficacy of conduction anesthesia depends to a great extent on accurate application of the local anesthetic solution (LA) in close proximity to the nerve trunk. The problem with most peripheral nerve stimulators available in the past was that they did not provide a small enough electrical stimulus. Correct positioning of the needle could not be guaranteed if muscle contractions occurred. New current-controlled stimulators have recently been developed with low currents from 0.1 mA upwards. We studied the intensity of stimulus currents eliciting just-visible muscle contractions in the lower leg (m. triceps surae) to see how this influenced the latency and success rate of sciatic nerve block.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a randomized study, 35 patients (18-68 years, ASA I and II) undergoing elective surgery were investigated. The block was performed by posterior approach using 30 ml 1% prilocaine. The stimulator was switched on with a frequency of 1 impulse/s and a stimulus current of 1 mA when the insulated needle was at a depth of 4 cm. In group 1 (n = 5) LA was injected when the first visible muscle contractions occurred at a current of 1.0 mA, but vanished if the current was diminished. In group 2 (n = 10) the needle was placed if a minimum current of 0.5 mA just triggered a muscular response. In group 3 (n = 10) the threshold current was 0.3 mA and in group 4 (n = 10) 0.1 mA. In all cases direct contact between the needle tip and the nerve was avoided.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14351585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Unlabelled: Propofol was compared to midazolam with regard to its quality as a sedative in regional anesthesia. 81 patients undergoing varicose-vein stripping under epidural anesthesia were divided into two groups: 39 were given propofol and 42 were given midazolam. Both groups were then subdivided into 3 subgroups. 30 min after epidural block, a bolus of propofol 1 mg/kg or midazolam 0.03 mg/kg was given followed by infusion of equipotent solutions: propofol 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0 mg/kg/h or midazolam 0.03, 0.045, 0.06 mg/kg/h. Continuous registration of blood pressure, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pCO2 was carried out and blood gas analysis was performed every 30 min.
Results: Clinically unimportant changes of circulatory and respiratory parameters were seen. Blood gas analyses showed hypercapnia greater than 50 mmHg in some patients. Brief apnea occurred after bolus propofol in 7.7% of cases and pain during injection in 66.6%. Restlessness: propofol 28.2%, midazolam 9.5%. Upper airway obstruction: propofol 30.8%, midazolam 57.1%. Recovery time after infusion ranged from 130 s with propofol to 26 min with midazolam. Postoperative evaluation included the following questions and responses: Sedation pleasant? propofol 97.5%, midazolam 100%. Sleep during surgery? propofol 94.8%, midazolam 83.5%. Prolonged tiredness? propofol 25.6%, midazolam 69%. Postoperative nausea? propofol 38.5%, midazolam 14.2%. Vomiting? propofol 17.9%, midazolam 11.9%. Our study showed that propofol is highly suitable as a sedative for regional anesthesia in spite of injection pain and frequent postoperative nausea. It is superior to midazolam because of the significantly shorter recovery time, providing improved control-lability and reduced posthypnotic sleep.
{"title":"[Continuous sedation for regional anesthesia with propofol (Disoprivan) and midazolam (Dormicum). A comparative study].","authors":"R Dertwinkel, H Nolte","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Propofol was compared to midazolam with regard to its quality as a sedative in regional anesthesia. 81 patients undergoing varicose-vein stripping under epidural anesthesia were divided into two groups: 39 were given propofol and 42 were given midazolam. Both groups were then subdivided into 3 subgroups. 30 min after epidural block, a bolus of propofol 1 mg/kg or midazolam 0.03 mg/kg was given followed by infusion of equipotent solutions: propofol 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0 mg/kg/h or midazolam 0.03, 0.045, 0.06 mg/kg/h. Continuous registration of blood pressure, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pCO2 was carried out and blood gas analysis was performed every 30 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinically unimportant changes of circulatory and respiratory parameters were seen. Blood gas analyses showed hypercapnia greater than 50 mmHg in some patients. Brief apnea occurred after bolus propofol in 7.7% of cases and pain during injection in 66.6%. Restlessness: propofol 28.2%, midazolam 9.5%. Upper airway obstruction: propofol 30.8%, midazolam 57.1%. Recovery time after infusion ranged from 130 s with propofol to 26 min with midazolam. Postoperative evaluation included the following questions and responses: Sedation pleasant? propofol 97.5%, midazolam 100%. Sleep during surgery? propofol 94.8%, midazolam 83.5%. Prolonged tiredness? propofol 25.6%, midazolam 69%. Postoperative nausea? propofol 38.5%, midazolam 14.2%. Vomiting? propofol 17.9%, midazolam 11.9%. Our study showed that propofol is highly suitable as a sedative for regional anesthesia in spite of injection pain and frequent postoperative nausea. It is superior to midazolam because of the significantly shorter recovery time, providing improved control-lability and reduced posthypnotic sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14393829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"7th annual meeting of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia. Mainz, 12-15 October 1988. Abstracts.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14351584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Variations in skin resistance are an indicator of a patient's sympathetic nerve activity. To record these variations, a mobile measuring system was developed. Even if this method is not yet used as a clinical routine, it could be helpful in studying the effects of nerve blocks in anesthesia. It seems to be advantageous for estimating the effectiveness of a block, the stress of the patient, and for recognizing very early reactions of a patient's sympathetic system. METHOD. An objective sign of a successful and sufficient block should be diminishing and finally the total lack of skin reaction amplitudes if the block is total. This was measured in a patient (male, 30 years old, nonsmoker, calm type) who suffered from a sudden loss of hearing on the left for four consecutive days when his left stellate ganglion was blocked. The effectiveness of the block was estimated from a two-channel measurement of skin reactions. On one channel the skin resistance of the blocked left side was recorded and on the other, unblocked skin areas of the right side were measured simultaneously. RESULTS. Although all four blocks were successful, which was evidenced by a Horner syndrome as well as elevated skin temperature 1-2 min after the injection of 7 ml bupivacaine (C6/C7), in all four cases residual sympathetic activity could be measured. In Fig. 1, the diminishing amplitudes of channel A as compared with channel B demonstrate this finding after the onset of a block at 2:03 p.m. An interpretation of skin reactions generated by a series of action potentials is given.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
{"title":"[The monitoring of sympathetic activity following stellate ganglion block].","authors":"A Janitzki, A Götte, H Nolte, M Meyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variations in skin resistance are an indicator of a patient's sympathetic nerve activity. To record these variations, a mobile measuring system was developed. Even if this method is not yet used as a clinical routine, it could be helpful in studying the effects of nerve blocks in anesthesia. It seems to be advantageous for estimating the effectiveness of a block, the stress of the patient, and for recognizing very early reactions of a patient's sympathetic system. METHOD. An objective sign of a successful and sufficient block should be diminishing and finally the total lack of skin reaction amplitudes if the block is total. This was measured in a patient (male, 30 years old, nonsmoker, calm type) who suffered from a sudden loss of hearing on the left for four consecutive days when his left stellate ganglion was blocked. The effectiveness of the block was estimated from a two-channel measurement of skin reactions. On one channel the skin resistance of the blocked left side was recorded and on the other, unblocked skin areas of the right side were measured simultaneously. RESULTS. Although all four blocks were successful, which was evidenced by a Horner syndrome as well as elevated skin temperature 1-2 min after the injection of 7 ml bupivacaine (C6/C7), in all four cases residual sympathetic activity could be measured. In Fig. 1, the diminishing amplitudes of channel A as compared with channel B demonstrate this finding after the onset of a block at 2:03 p.m. An interpretation of skin reactions generated by a series of action potentials is given.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14537670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrostimulation is a common method of nerve localization. To improve the nerve-stimulating needle, we developed a new bipolar nerve-stimulating electrode with a more convenient extension of its electric field. Figure 1a shows the new nerve-stimulating needle; in Fig. 1b a longitudinal section is depicted. A hollow cannula (1) is surrounded by an isolator (5) that separates the internal electrode (1) from the external electrode (6). The surface of the latter is also covered by an isolator (8). Two cables, (2) and (7), connect the electrodes to a nerve stimulator. Syringes and tubes can be connected to the needle by using the attached part (4). Figs. 2a and b show top- and side views of the needle's sharp end. Except for small parts of the internal (1) and external electrode (2), both electrodes are covered by isolation (3). This arrangement leads to the radially asymmetric extension of the electric field. Studies with animal nerve-muscle preparations showed that the density of the electric field is higher, and thus electrostimulation can be carried out with up to 75% lower impulse amplitude as compared with insulated monopolar electrodes. The main advantage of the new arrangement of electrodes, however, is the dependency between revolution of the nerve-stimulating needle on its axis and the evoked muscle response. Muscle potentials measured by electromyography and respective degrees of needle torsion are shown in Fig. 3 (black circles: bipolar radially asymmetric electrode, white circles: insulated monopolar electrode).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
{"title":"[A bipolar electrode with a radial asymmetrically aligned electric field. A new principle of nerve localization in regional anesthesia and pain therapy].","authors":"N Kübler, D Theiss, T Gaertner","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrostimulation is a common method of nerve localization. To improve the nerve-stimulating needle, we developed a new bipolar nerve-stimulating electrode with a more convenient extension of its electric field. Figure 1a shows the new nerve-stimulating needle; in Fig. 1b a longitudinal section is depicted. A hollow cannula (1) is surrounded by an isolator (5) that separates the internal electrode (1) from the external electrode (6). The surface of the latter is also covered by an isolator (8). Two cables, (2) and (7), connect the electrodes to a nerve stimulator. Syringes and tubes can be connected to the needle by using the attached part (4). Figs. 2a and b show top- and side views of the needle's sharp end. Except for small parts of the internal (1) and external electrode (2), both electrodes are covered by isolation (3). This arrangement leads to the radially asymmetric extension of the electric field. Studies with animal nerve-muscle preparations showed that the density of the electric field is higher, and thus electrostimulation can be carried out with up to 75% lower impulse amplitude as compared with insulated monopolar electrodes. The main advantage of the new arrangement of electrodes, however, is the dependency between revolution of the nerve-stimulating needle on its axis and the evoked muscle response. Muscle potentials measured by electromyography and respective degrees of needle torsion are shown in Fig. 3 (black circles: bipolar radially asymmetric electrode, white circles: insulated monopolar electrode).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14537671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuous spinal anesthesia has not yet found general acceptance, although it is a simple and efficient method. Its main advantage is allowing a reliable block to be built up step by step while carefully monitoring the cardiovascular changes. Postspinal headache can be avoided by restricting the use of elderly patients. At our institution, continuous spinal anesthesia has been administered to geriatric high-risk patients for more than 6 years. We report our experience from the year 1986. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Over a 1-year period continuous spinal anesthesia was used for 157 patients with a mean age of 80.4 years (Fig. 1). Of these patients 111 (70.7%) were classified as ASA 3-5 (Fig. 2). In 2 cases a myocardial infarction dated back only 4 and 11 days. The most common indications for surgery were hip fractures (97, 61.8%) and vascular occlusions (37, 23.6%). An 18G Tuohy needle was used for lumbar puncture. The catheter (Portex minipack) was advanced 3-6 cm into the subarachnoid space. Plain bupivacaine 0.5% was injected in small increments until the desired block level was achieved. The catheters were removed immediately after surgery. RESULTS. In 155 of 157 cases surgery was completed under regional anesthesia. Two patients had to be intubated intraoperatively (1 unexpected laparatomy during vascular surgery, 1 with insufficient block for lumbar sympathectomy). The main technical problem was impossibility to advance the catheter into the subarachnoid space despite free flow of CSF (5 cases). For these patients single-shot spinal (4 cases) or epidural anesthesia (1 case) was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
{"title":"[Continuous spinal anesthesia using bupivacaine. Report of experiences].","authors":"M Jöhr","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous spinal anesthesia has not yet found general acceptance, although it is a simple and efficient method. Its main advantage is allowing a reliable block to be built up step by step while carefully monitoring the cardiovascular changes. Postspinal headache can be avoided by restricting the use of elderly patients. At our institution, continuous spinal anesthesia has been administered to geriatric high-risk patients for more than 6 years. We report our experience from the year 1986. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Over a 1-year period continuous spinal anesthesia was used for 157 patients with a mean age of 80.4 years (Fig. 1). Of these patients 111 (70.7%) were classified as ASA 3-5 (Fig. 2). In 2 cases a myocardial infarction dated back only 4 and 11 days. The most common indications for surgery were hip fractures (97, 61.8%) and vascular occlusions (37, 23.6%). An 18G Tuohy needle was used for lumbar puncture. The catheter (Portex minipack) was advanced 3-6 cm into the subarachnoid space. Plain bupivacaine 0.5% was injected in small increments until the desired block level was achieved. The catheters were removed immediately after surgery. RESULTS. In 155 of 157 cases surgery was completed under regional anesthesia. Two patients had to be intubated intraoperatively (1 unexpected laparatomy during vascular surgery, 1 with insufficient block for lumbar sympathectomy). The main technical problem was impossibility to advance the catheter into the subarachnoid space despite free flow of CSF (5 cases). For these patients single-shot spinal (4 cases) or epidural anesthesia (1 case) was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14537669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In a randomized, double-blind study, the efficacy of prilocaine 1% (group 1, 30 patients) was compared to mepivacaine 1% (group 2, 30 patients). All patients had a combined sciatic/femoral block for surgery of the lower extremities; a tourniquet was applied in each case. In each patient the block was done using 50 ml of a 1% solution of local anesthetic: 20 ml for the sciatic and 30 ml for the 3-in-1 block. The time to onset of sensory block was approx. 4 min in both groups; the onset of motor blockade averaged 6 min and after 10-12 and 15 min sensory and motor blockades, respectively, were complete. On the average, patients were pain-free for 254 min with prilocaine and 267 min with mepivacaine. Four of 30 patients (= 13%) in group 1 an 6 of 30 patients (= 20%) in group 2 had an unsatisfactory blockade and had to be supplemented by analgesics or general anesthesia. The finding of a significant correlation between the voltage necessary for stimulation and the efficacy of the blockade underlines the importance of correct stimulation when identifying the nerves.
{"title":"[Combined sciatic/3-in-1 block. III. Prilocaine 1% versus mepivacaine 1%].","authors":"F Wagner, L Taeger","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a randomized, double-blind study, the efficacy of prilocaine 1% (group 1, 30 patients) was compared to mepivacaine 1% (group 2, 30 patients). All patients had a combined sciatic/femoral block for surgery of the lower extremities; a tourniquet was applied in each case. In each patient the block was done using 50 ml of a 1% solution of local anesthetic: 20 ml for the sciatic and 30 ml for the 3-in-1 block. The time to onset of sensory block was approx. 4 min in both groups; the onset of motor blockade averaged 6 min and after 10-12 and 15 min sensory and motor blockades, respectively, were complete. On the average, patients were pain-free for 254 min with prilocaine and 267 min with mepivacaine. Four of 30 patients (= 13%) in group 1 an 6 of 30 patients (= 20%) in group 2 had an unsatisfactory blockade and had to be supplemented by analgesics or general anesthesia. The finding of a significant correlation between the voltage necessary for stimulation and the efficacy of the blockade underlines the importance of correct stimulation when identifying the nerves.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"14178023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}