首页 > 最新文献

American Surgeon最新文献

英文 中文
Bundling Procedures in Critically Ill Trauma Patients: Should It Be Done?
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251314154
Hannah Shin, Amy Young, Madison E Morgan, Hanna Kim, Catherine T Brown, Katherine Moore, James J Lamberg, Lindsey L Perea

Background: The precautions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic led to the growing practice of bundling lines in patients requiring intubation. Our study aims to examine the effect of immediate bundled lines (IBL) on traumatic injuries. We hypothesized that severely injured patients may benefit from IBL.

Methods: A retrospective review of all intubated trauma patients (1/2015-12/2020) at a Level I Trauma Center was conducted. Patients ≤18 years and those who died or were transferred prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission were excluded. IBL was defined as placement of central venous catheter (CVC) and arterial line (AL) ≤4 hours after intubation. Delayed lines were any lines placed >4 hours after intubation. Primary outcome was time from intubation to CVC and AL.

Results: 728 patients were included. The majority received CVC and/or AL with 17.7% in a delayed fashion. Severe head injury (AIS ≥3) most often had immediate AL or delayed bundled lines (P < 0.001). IBL were more common with gunshot wounds (GSW) (P < 0.001) and blood transfusions (P < 0.001). IBL were associated with significantly lower GCS (P = 0.018) and higher median ISS. Multivariate logistic regression revealed severe/profound ISS, GSW, and pedestrian struck were predictive of IBL.

Discussion: Intubated trauma patients who presented with certain mechanisms (GSW, pedestrian struck), received blood transfusions, or exhibited severe/profound ISS may be more likely to receive IBL. IBL is not superior to either immediate AL or to no lines in terms of mortality. No lines had a significant effect on ICU LOS or hospital LOS, except in the setting of severe head injury.

{"title":"Bundling Procedures in Critically Ill Trauma Patients: Should It Be Done?","authors":"Hannah Shin, Amy Young, Madison E Morgan, Hanna Kim, Catherine T Brown, Katherine Moore, James J Lamberg, Lindsey L Perea","doi":"10.1177/00031348251314154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251314154","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The precautions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic led to the growing practice of bundling lines in patients requiring intubation. Our study aims to examine the effect of immediate bundled lines (IBL) on traumatic injuries. We hypothesized that severely injured patients may benefit from IBL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all intubated trauma patients (1/2015-12/2020) at a Level I Trauma Center was conducted. Patients ≤18 years and those who died or were transferred prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission were excluded. IBL was defined as placement of central venous catheter (CVC) and arterial line (AL) ≤4 hours after intubation. Delayed lines were any lines placed >4 hours after intubation. Primary outcome was time from intubation to CVC and AL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>728 patients were included. The majority received CVC and/or AL with 17.7% in a delayed fashion. Severe head injury (AIS ≥3) most often had immediate AL or delayed bundled lines (<i>P</i> < 0.001). IBL were more common with gunshot wounds (GSW) (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and blood transfusions (<i>P</i> < 0.001). IBL were associated with significantly lower GCS (<i>P</i> = 0.018) and higher median ISS. Multivariate logistic regression revealed severe/profound ISS, GSW, and pedestrian struck were predictive of IBL.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Intubated trauma patients who presented with certain mechanisms (GSW, pedestrian struck), received blood transfusions, or exhibited severe/profound ISS may be more likely to receive IBL. IBL is not superior to either immediate AL or to no lines in terms of mortality. No lines had a significant effect on ICU LOS or hospital LOS, except in the setting of severe head injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251314154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143063199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inpatient Cost of Trauma Care Versus Repair of Elective Open Inguinal Hernias: Nationwide Trends Over Nearly a Decade. 创伤护理与选择性开放式腹股沟疝修补的住院费用:近十年来全国趋势。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251313995
Anushka Paladugu, Megan Donnelly, Areg Grigorian, Lourdes Swentek, Catherine Kuza, Kurt Yamamoto, Jonathan Shipley, Ninh Nguyen, Jeffry Nahmias

Purpose: Concerns exist regarding increased trauma activation fees at the expense of vulnerable patients. In contrast, elective open inguinal hernia repair (E-OIHR) has remained relatively fixed in terms of technique. This study aimed to examine health care costs for E-OIHR and trauma patients, hypothesizing trauma cost would increase from 2010 to 2018, while E-OIHR cost would remain unchanged. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried (2010-2018) for admitted patients undergoing unilateral E-OIHR or trauma-related admission. Health care costs per admission, total annual costs, and trends of E-OIHR and trauma admissions were also examined. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association of individual- and hospital-level variables with total costs. Results: Unilateral E-OIHR admission cost more than doubled per case in 2018. Trauma cost per admission also increased, however, only by 34%. Total costs for all E-OIHR admissions increased 26%, whereas trauma admission costs increased 32%. Both trauma admissions and unilateral E-OIHR admissions decreased; however, E-OIHR admissions decreased more. Multiple linear regression demonstrated compared to the cost of E-OIHR, trauma care decreased when adjusting for year, age, severity, hospital type, and length of stay (P < .001). Conclusion: The rate of increase in cost per unilateral E-OIHR admission exceeded that of trauma. However, the total economic burden for trauma care increased by billions of dollars due to a steady increase in per incidence cost and only slightly lower rates of trauma admissions. Increased focus on high-value care to curtail increasing costs of E-OIHR and especially trauma appears warranted.

目的:人们担心创伤激活费用的增加会损害弱势患者的利益。相比之下,选择性开放式腹股沟疝修补术(E-OIHR)在技术方面仍然相对固定。本研究旨在检验E-OIHR和创伤患者的医疗保健成本,假设2010年至2018年创伤成本增加,而E-OIHR成本保持不变。方法:查询全国住院患者样本数据库(2010-2018),查询单侧E-OIHR或创伤相关住院的患者。每次入院的卫生保健费用、年度总费用以及E-OIHR和创伤入院的趋势也进行了检查。多元线性回归用于估计个人和医院水平变量与总成本的关联。结果:2018年单侧E-OIHR入院费用每例增加一倍以上。然而,每次入院的创伤费用也只增加了34%。所有E-OIHR入院的总费用增加了26%,而创伤住院费用增加了32%。创伤入院率和单侧E-OIHR入院率均下降;然而,E-OIHR入院率下降更多。多元线性回归显示,与E-OIHR费用相比,在调整了年份、年龄、严重程度、医院类型和住院时间后,创伤护理费用下降(P < 0.001)。结论:单侧E-OIHR住院费用的增长速度超过创伤。然而,创伤护理的总经济负担增加了数十亿美元,这是由于每次发病率的稳定增长和创伤入院率的轻微下降。似乎有必要加强对高价值护理的关注,以遏制电子《国际卫生条例》,特别是创伤方面日益增加的费用。
{"title":"Inpatient Cost of Trauma Care Versus Repair of Elective Open Inguinal Hernias: Nationwide Trends Over Nearly a Decade.","authors":"Anushka Paladugu, Megan Donnelly, Areg Grigorian, Lourdes Swentek, Catherine Kuza, Kurt Yamamoto, Jonathan Shipley, Ninh Nguyen, Jeffry Nahmias","doi":"10.1177/00031348251313995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251313995","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Concerns exist regarding increased trauma activation fees at the expense of vulnerable patients. In contrast, elective open inguinal hernia repair (E-OIHR) has remained relatively fixed in terms of technique. This study aimed to examine health care costs for E-OIHR and trauma patients, hypothesizing trauma cost would increase from 2010 to 2018, while E-OIHR cost would remain unchanged. <b>Methods:</b> The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried (2010-2018) for admitted patients undergoing unilateral E-OIHR or trauma-related admission. Health care costs per admission, total annual costs, and trends of E-OIHR and trauma admissions were also examined. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association of individual- and hospital-level variables with total costs. <b>Results:</b> Unilateral E-OIHR admission cost more than doubled per case in 2018. Trauma cost per admission also increased, however, only by 34%. Total costs for all E-OIHR admissions increased 26%, whereas trauma admission costs increased 32%. Both trauma admissions and unilateral E-OIHR admissions decreased; however, E-OIHR admissions decreased more. Multiple linear regression demonstrated compared to the cost of E-OIHR, trauma care decreased when adjusting for year, age, severity, hospital type, and length of stay (<i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> The rate of increase in cost per unilateral E-OIHR admission exceeded that of trauma. However, the total economic burden for trauma care increased by billions of dollars due to a steady increase in per incidence cost and only slightly lower rates of trauma admissions. Increased focus on high-value care to curtail increasing costs of E-OIHR and especially trauma appears warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251313995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142998770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Axilla Management in Breast Cancer Surgery: Brief Review and Current Practice Recommendations. 乳腺癌手术中的腋窝管理:简要回顾和当前的实践建议。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251313529
Karla Lužaić, Konstantinos Lachanas, Konstantinos-Odysseas Vamvakopoulos, Andreas Sidiropoulos, Dimitra Vamvakopoulou, Iakovos Nomikos

The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the axilla in breast cancer patients has changed significantly over the past 30 years, with the replacement of complete axillary lymph node dissection practices by less invasive approaches. Reference is made to clinical findings that have led to practical treatment recommendations and are paving the way to new levels of de-escalation in breast cancer surgery.

在过去的30年里,乳腺癌患者腋窝的诊断和治疗方法发生了重大变化,完全腋窝淋巴结清扫被侵入性较小的方法所取代。参考临床发现,这些发现导致了实际的治疗建议,并为乳腺癌手术的新水平的降低铺平了道路。
{"title":"Axilla Management in Breast Cancer Surgery: Brief Review and Current Practice Recommendations.","authors":"Karla Lužaić, Konstantinos Lachanas, Konstantinos-Odysseas Vamvakopoulos, Andreas Sidiropoulos, Dimitra Vamvakopoulou, Iakovos Nomikos","doi":"10.1177/00031348251313529","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251313529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the axilla in breast cancer patients has changed significantly over the past 30 years, with the replacement of complete axillary lymph node dissection practices by less invasive approaches. Reference is made to clinical findings that have led to practical treatment recommendations and are paving the way to new levels of de-escalation in breast cancer surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251313529"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142998766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Paramedic Judgment as a Basis for Trauma Triage: Is it an Effective Strategy? 护理人员判断作为创伤分诊的基础:这是一个有效的策略吗?
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241312123
Matthew P Schaefer, Chrisnel Lamy, Dalier Mederos-Rodriguez, John D Berne

Introduction: American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) defines minimum Standard Criteria (SC) for Level 1 trauma. In our hospital, discretion of prehospital personnel ("Paramedic Judgment" [PJ]) can initiate Full Trauma Triage Activation (FTTA) in the absence of ACS-COT criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate overtriage and undertriage for PJ vs SC.

Methods: 1846 patients met criteria from 1/1/19 to 1/5/23. This study utilized the Cribari Matrix to define under, over, and appropriate triage, and utilizes Chi-Squared Test to determine significance. We performed an adjusted binomial logistic regression comparing overtriage and undertriage for PJ vs SC. We analyzed the Need for Emergent Intervention-6 (NEI-6) model to see if it could be a way to accurately assess triage.

Results: Overtriage for the PJ group was 68.9%, compared to 54.8% for SC, with a P-value ≤.05, and undertriage for the PJ group was 1.23% compared to 0.13%. After adjusting for confounders, the risk of overtriage by the PJ group was 2.04 times as likely compared to the SC group (OR 2.04; P < .01). The OR for undertriage was not calculated due to lack of power. The odds of needing a blood transfusion for the PJ patients compared to the SC patients is approximately one-third (OR 0.33; P < .01). The other variables were lacking in power.

Conclusion: The aim of this study is to evaluate over and undertriage for PJ and SC at our large urban center. We found that overtriage was 2 times as likely when using PJ compared with the SC.

简介:美国外科医师学会创伤委员会(ACS-COT)定义了1级创伤的最低标准标准(SC)。在我们医院,院前人员的自由裁量权(“护理人员判断”[PJ])可以在没有ACS-COT标准的情况下启动完全创伤分类激活(FTTA)。本研究的目的是评估PJ与sc的过度分诊和不足分诊。方法:1846例符合1/1/19至1/5/23标准的患者。本研究使用Cribari矩阵来定义下、上和适当的分流,并使用卡方检验来确定显著性。我们对PJ和SC的过度分诊和不足分诊进行了调整后的二项逻辑回归比较。我们分析了紧急干预需求-6 (NEI-6)模型,看看它是否可以准确评估分诊。结果:PJ组过度分诊率为68.9%,SC组为54.8%,p值≤。PJ组的分流率为1.23%,而PJ组为0.13%。在调整混杂因素后,PJ组过度分诊的风险是SC组的2.04倍(OR 2.04;P < 0.01)。由于功率不足,没有计算漏电的OR。与SC患者相比,PJ患者需要输血的几率约为三分之一(OR 0.33;P < 0.01)。其他变量的功率不足。结论:本研究的目的是评估我国大型城市中心的PJ和SC的过度和不足。我们发现,当使用PJ时,与SC相比,过度分类的可能性是2倍。
{"title":"Paramedic Judgment as a Basis for Trauma Triage: Is it an Effective Strategy?","authors":"Matthew P Schaefer, Chrisnel Lamy, Dalier Mederos-Rodriguez, John D Berne","doi":"10.1177/00031348241312123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241312123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) defines minimum Standard Criteria (SC) for Level 1 trauma. In our hospital, discretion of prehospital personnel (\"Paramedic Judgment\" [PJ]) can initiate Full Trauma Triage Activation (FTTA) in the absence of ACS-COT criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate overtriage and undertriage for PJ vs SC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1846 patients met criteria from 1/1/19 to 1/5/23. This study utilized the Cribari Matrix to define under, over, and appropriate triage, and utilizes Chi-Squared Test to determine significance. We performed an adjusted binomial logistic regression comparing overtriage and undertriage for PJ vs SC. We analyzed the Need for Emergent Intervention-6 (NEI-6) model to see if it could be a way to accurately assess triage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overtriage for the PJ group was 68.9%, compared to 54.8% for SC, with a <i>P</i>-value ≤.05, and undertriage for the PJ group was 1.23% compared to 0.13%. After adjusting for confounders, the risk of overtriage by the PJ group was 2.04 times as likely compared to the SC group (OR 2.04; <i>P</i> < .01). The OR for undertriage was not calculated due to lack of power. The odds of needing a blood transfusion for the PJ patients compared to the SC patients is approximately one-third (OR 0.33; <i>P</i> < .01). The other variables were lacking in power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate over and undertriage for PJ and SC at our large urban center. We found that overtriage was 2 times as likely when using PJ compared with the SC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348241312123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142998773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental Practice, Visualization, and Mental Imagery in Surgery: a Systematic Review. 外科手术中的心理练习、可视化和心理意象:系统综述。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251314152
James D Schmidt, Kie Shidara, Andrew Roos, Yoshihiro Katsuura

Physicians face constant pressures to learn and adapt to new knowledge, techniques, and technology. Mental practice-the process of rehearsing a task without the physical action of performing it-is a cognitive tool that is used by many professions to hone abilities and prepare for difficult undertakings. Mental practice can help optimize physician performance but there is minimal research on its application in practice. In this systematic review we assessed the usefulness of mental practice for surgeons to aid in skill acquisition. Using PRISMA guidelines, 12 studies were selected for evaluation. The results of these studies show clear advantages to using mental practice to improve overall surgical performance. Here, we discuss mental practice, the evidence for its use, and how it can be learned and performed.

医生面临着不断学习和适应新知识、新技术和新技术的压力。心理练习——在没有实际行动的情况下对任务进行预演的过程——是一种认知工具,被许多专业人士用来磨练能力和为困难的任务做准备。心理练习可以帮助优化医生的表现,但关于其在实践中的应用的研究很少。在这篇系统综述中,我们评估了心理练习对外科医生技能习得的帮助。根据PRISMA指南,选择了12项研究进行评估。这些研究的结果表明,使用心理练习来提高整体手术效果有明显的优势。在这里,我们讨论心理练习,其使用的证据,以及如何学习和执行。
{"title":"Mental Practice, Visualization, and Mental Imagery in Surgery: a Systematic Review.","authors":"James D Schmidt, Kie Shidara, Andrew Roos, Yoshihiro Katsuura","doi":"10.1177/00031348251314152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251314152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians face constant pressures to learn and adapt to new knowledge, techniques, and technology. Mental practice-the process of rehearsing a task without the physical action of performing it-is a cognitive tool that is used by many professions to hone abilities and prepare for difficult undertakings. Mental practice can help optimize physician performance but there is minimal research on its application in practice. In this systematic review we assessed the usefulness of mental practice for surgeons to aid in skill acquisition. Using PRISMA guidelines, 12 studies were selected for evaluation. The results of these studies show clear advantages to using mental practice to improve overall surgical performance. Here, we discuss mental practice, the evidence for its use, and how it can be learned and performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251314152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142982506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effectiveness and Safety of Beta Antagonists in Patients With Burns: An Updated Meta-Analysis. -拮抗剂在烧伤患者中的有效性和安全性:一项最新的荟萃分析。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251313991
Aribah Bhatti, Sanaullah Shah, Muhammad Shahzaib, Muhamad Amaan Nadeem, Asim Shaikh, Habib Ur Rehman, Syed Saaid Rizvi, Maimoona Khan, Jasninder Dhaliwal Singh, Faisal Mahfooz, Rameel Muhammad Aftab, Dua Fatima Zaheer Rao, Muhammad Azhar Chachar

Aims: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the safety and effectiveness of beta antagonists for improving clinical care in burn patients, compared to placebo.

Methods: Articles from randomized-controlled trials were identified by a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane. We included relevant trials involving patients with burn. Trials were eligible if they evaluated propranolol and compared to usual care or placebo. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 2114 patients were included from 14 RCTs. Beta-blocker-treated patients had decreased heart rates (WMD = -14.73, 95% CIs = [-19.14, -10.32]), mean arterial pressure (WMD = -2.76, 95% CIs = [-3.81, -1.70]), rate pressure product (WMD = -1.13, 95% CIs = [-1.56, -0.71]), reduced time for wound healing (WMD = -5.08, 95% CIs [-8.97, -1.18]), and lower resting energy expenditure (WMD = -168.83, 95% CIs [-232.03, -105.63]). However, use of beta-blockers did not reduce mortality rate (WMD = 0.98, 95% CIs [0.68, 1.41]), incidence of sepsis (RR = 0.82, 95% CIs = [0.50, 1.35]), or length of stay in hospital (WMD = -1.50, 95% CIs [-4.76, 1.77]) compared with placebo.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the administration of propranolol to burned patients does not contribute to increased mortality rates, reduced length of hospital stays, or heightened sepsis occurrence. It demonstrates a protective effect on heart function by reducing heart rate, resting energy expenditure, rate pressure product, and wound healing. More randomized-controlled and multi-center studies are needed to effectively establish the use of beta antagonists in burn patients.

目的:本系统综述的目的是评估与安慰剂相比-拮抗剂改善烧伤患者临床护理的安全性和有效性。方法:通过PubMed和Cochrane的文献检索来确定来自随机对照试验的文章。我们纳入了涉及烧伤患者的相关试验。如果对心得安进行评估,并与常规治疗或安慰剂进行比较,则试验是合格的。我们使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。结果:14项随机对照试验共纳入2114例患者。β受体阻断剂治疗的患者心率降低(WMD = -14.73, 95% ci =[-19.14, -10.32]),平均动脉压(WMD = -2.76, 95% ci =[-3.81, -1.70]),心率压差(WMD = -1.13, 95% ci =[-1.56, -0.71]),伤口愈合时间缩短(WMD = -5.08, 95% ci[-8.97, -1.18]),静息能量消耗降低(WMD = -168.83, 95% ci[-232.03, -105.63])。然而,与安慰剂相比,使用β受体阻滞剂并没有降低死亡率(WMD = 0.98, 95% ci[0.68, 1.41])、败血症发生率(RR = 0.82, 95% ci =[0.50, 1.35])或住院时间(WMD = -1.50, 95% ci[-4.76, 1.77])。结论:我们的研究结果表明,对烧伤患者给予心得安不会增加死亡率、缩短住院时间或增加败血症的发生。它通过降低心率、静息能量消耗、心率压积和伤口愈合对心脏功能有保护作用。需要更多的随机对照和多中心研究来有效地确定-拮抗剂在烧伤患者中的应用。
{"title":"The Effectiveness and Safety of Beta Antagonists in Patients With Burns: An Updated Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Aribah Bhatti, Sanaullah Shah, Muhammad Shahzaib, Muhamad Amaan Nadeem, Asim Shaikh, Habib Ur Rehman, Syed Saaid Rizvi, Maimoona Khan, Jasninder Dhaliwal Singh, Faisal Mahfooz, Rameel Muhammad Aftab, Dua Fatima Zaheer Rao, Muhammad Azhar Chachar","doi":"10.1177/00031348251313991","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251313991","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the safety and effectiveness of beta antagonists for improving clinical care in burn patients, compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles from randomized-controlled trials were identified by a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane. We included relevant trials involving patients with burn. Trials were eligible if they evaluated propranolol and compared to usual care or placebo. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2114 patients were included from 14 RCTs. Beta-blocker-treated patients had decreased heart rates (WMD = -14.73, 95% CIs = [-19.14, -10.32]), mean arterial pressure (WMD = -2.76, 95% CIs = [-3.81, -1.70]), rate pressure product (WMD = -1.13, 95% CIs = [-1.56, -0.71]), reduced time for wound healing (WMD = -5.08, 95% CIs [-8.97, -1.18]), and lower resting energy expenditure (WMD = -168.83, 95% CIs [-232.03, -105.63]). However, use of beta-blockers did not reduce mortality rate (WMD = 0.98, 95% CIs [0.68, 1.41]), incidence of sepsis (RR = 0.82, 95% CIs = [0.50, 1.35]), or length of stay in hospital (WMD = -1.50, 95% CIs [-4.76, 1.77]) compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that the administration of propranolol to burned patients does not contribute to increased mortality rates, reduced length of hospital stays, or heightened sepsis occurrence. It demonstrates a protective effect on heart function by reducing heart rate, resting energy expenditure, rate pressure product, and wound healing. More randomized-controlled and multi-center studies are needed to effectively establish the use of beta antagonists in burn patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251313991"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142962066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expression of Concern. 表达关心。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241305412
{"title":"Expression of Concern.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/00031348241305412","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348241305412","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348241305412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142941555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter re: Volvulus in Eastern Anatolia. 字母re:安纳托利亚东部的扭转。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251314153
Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp, Rifat Peksoz, Esra Disci
{"title":"Letter re: Volvulus in Eastern Anatolia.","authors":"Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp, Rifat Peksoz, Esra Disci","doi":"10.1177/00031348251314153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251314153","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251314153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142963547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 经验性抗真菌治疗在穿孔性消化性溃疡患者中的作用:一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251313528
Dimitrios Giannis, Weiying Lu, Salim El Hadwe, Georgios Geropoulos, Martine A Louis, Nageswara Rao Mandava, Galinos Barmparas

Fungal growth is common in intraoperative cultures of patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) leading to the common use of empiric antifungal therapy, with current evidence not clearly supporting this practice. The goal of this updated systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the effect of empiric antifungals in patients with PPU. Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases, following the PRISMA 2020 statement. A total of eight studies were identified reporting on 1802 patients. The population consisted of 67.3% males (n = 121/1802), with a mean age of 59.1 ± 13.2 years. Most of the population underwent surgery (n = 1763/1802, 97.8%), which was most frequently omental patch (n = 1169/1411, 82.8%), while 12.8% (n = 140/1096) underwent laparoscopic repair. Intraoperative cultures were obtained in 73.7% (n = 1262/1713); blood cultures were obtained in 54.5% (n = 467/857) and were positive for fungus in 44.1% (n = 558/1262) and in 5.6% (n = 26/467), respectively. Empiric antifungal treatment was administered in 19.6% (n = 353/1802). The most common agent was fluconazole reported in 6 studies. At a mean follow-up of 34.4 ± 9.9 days, 191/1787 (10.7%) patients died. Patients with fungus-positive intraoperative cultures had significantly increased odds of having diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.05-2.30), history of malignancy (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.22-6.45), being on steroids (OR: 5.13; 95% CI: 1.37-19.3), and increased mortality (OR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.67-3.70). Empiric antifungal therapy did not significantly decrease the odds for death (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 0.33-6.41). The presence of fungi in the peritoneal fluid is associated with increased risk of death, that is not affected by administration of empiric antifungal therapy.

真菌生长在穿孔性消化性溃疡(PPU)患者的术中培养中很常见,导致经验性抗真菌治疗的普遍使用,目前的证据并不明确支持这种做法。这项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是综合经验性抗真菌药物对PPU患者的影响。根据PRISMA 2020声明,通过MEDLINE (PubMed)和EMBASE数据库的综合文献检索确定了符合条件的研究。共有8项研究报告了1802例患者。男性占67.3% (n = 121/1802),平均年龄59.1±13.2岁。大多数人群选择手术(n = 1763/1802, 97.8%),其中以网膜补片(n = 1169/1411, 82.8%)最为常见,12.8% (n = 140/1096)选择腹腔镜修补。术中培养占73.7% (n = 1262/1713);血培养阳性率为54.5% (n = 467/857),真菌阳性率为44.1% (n = 558/1262)和5.6% (n = 26/467)。经验性抗真菌治疗占19.6% (n = 353/1802)。最常见的药物是氟康唑,有6项研究报道。平均随访34.4±9.9天,191/1787例(10.7%)患者死亡。术中真菌培养阳性的患者患糖尿病的几率显著增加(OR: 1.55;95% CI: 1.05-2.30),恶性肿瘤史(OR: 2.80;95% CI: 1.22-6.45),服用类固醇(OR: 5.13;95% CI: 1.37-19.3),死亡率增加(OR: 2.49;95% ci: 1.67-3.70)。经验性抗真菌治疗并未显著降低死亡几率(OR: 1.45;95% ci: 0.33-6.41)。腹膜液中真菌的存在与死亡风险增加有关,这不受经验性抗真菌治疗的影响。
{"title":"The Role of Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dimitrios Giannis, Weiying Lu, Salim El Hadwe, Georgios Geropoulos, Martine A Louis, Nageswara Rao Mandava, Galinos Barmparas","doi":"10.1177/00031348251313528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251313528","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fungal growth is common in intraoperative cultures of patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) leading to the common use of empiric antifungal therapy, with current evidence not clearly supporting this practice. The goal of this updated systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the effect of empiric antifungals in patients with PPU. Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases, following the PRISMA 2020 statement. A total of eight studies were identified reporting on 1802 patients. The population consisted of 67.3% males (n = 121/1802), with a mean age of 59.1 ± 13.2 years. Most of the population underwent surgery (n = 1763/1802, 97.8%), which was most frequently omental patch (n = 1169/1411, 82.8%), while 12.8% (n = 140/1096) underwent laparoscopic repair. Intraoperative cultures were obtained in 73.7% (n = 1262/1713); blood cultures were obtained in 54.5% (n = 467/857) and were positive for fungus in 44.1% (n = 558/1262) and in 5.6% (n = 26/467), respectively. Empiric antifungal treatment was administered in 19.6% (n = 353/1802). The most common agent was fluconazole reported in 6 studies. At a mean follow-up of 34.4 ± 9.9 days, 191/1787 (10.7%) patients died. Patients with fungus-positive intraoperative cultures had significantly increased odds of having diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.05-2.30), history of malignancy (OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.22-6.45), being on steroids (OR: 5.13; 95% CI: 1.37-19.3), and increased mortality (OR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.67-3.70). Empiric antifungal therapy did not significantly decrease the odds for death (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 0.33-6.41). The presence of fungi in the peritoneal fluid is associated with increased risk of death, that is not affected by administration of empiric antifungal therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251313528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142942742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of the Inflammatory Burden Index on Prognosis After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis. 炎症负担指数对结直肠癌肝转移肝切除术后预后的影响。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251313993
Hironari Kawai, Kenei Furukawa, Masashi Tsunematsu, Yoshihiro Shirai, Shinji Onda, Koichiro Haruki, Michinori Matsumoto, Norimitsu Okui, Tomohiko Taniai, Toru Ikegami

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the inflammatory burden index (IBI), a novel inflammation-based biomarker, in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after hepatic resection.

Patients and methods: One hundred fifty patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The IBI was defined as C-reactive protein × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count. The relationship of the IBI with overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Seventy-three (49%) patients had a high IBI (>3.45). In univariate analysis, overall survival was significantly worse in patients with lymph node metastases (P = 0.048), high NLR (P = 0.03), and high IBI (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, high IBI (P = 0.048) was an independent and significant predictor of overall survival. Patients with a high IBI had more postoperative complications compared with those with a low IBI (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: The IBI was a strong predictor for both short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection for CRLM.

背景/目的:本研究的目的是研究炎症负担指数(IBI),一种新的基于炎症的生物标志物,在肝切除术后结肠直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者中的预后影响。患者和方法:对150例行肝切除术的CRLM患者进行回顾性分析。IBI定义为c反应蛋白×中性粒细胞计数/淋巴细胞计数。通过单因素和多因素分析研究IBI与总生存率的关系。结果:73例(49%)患者IBI高(bbb3.45)。在单因素分析中,淋巴结转移患者(P = 0.048)、高NLR (P = 0.03)和高IBI (P < 0.01)患者的总生存率明显较差。在多变量分析中,高IBI (P = 0.048)是总生存的独立且显著的预测因子。高IBI患者术后并发症发生率高于低IBI患者(P < 0.01)。结论:对于接受肝切除术的CRLM患者,IBI是短期和长期预后的一个强有力的预测指标。
{"title":"Impact of the Inflammatory Burden Index on Prognosis After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.","authors":"Hironari Kawai, Kenei Furukawa, Masashi Tsunematsu, Yoshihiro Shirai, Shinji Onda, Koichiro Haruki, Michinori Matsumoto, Norimitsu Okui, Tomohiko Taniai, Toru Ikegami","doi":"10.1177/00031348251313993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251313993","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the inflammatory burden index (IBI), a novel inflammation-based biomarker, in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after hepatic resection.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>One hundred fifty patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The IBI was defined as C-reactive protein × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count. The relationship of the IBI with overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three (49%) patients had a high IBI (>3.45). In univariate analysis, overall survival was significantly worse in patients with lymph node metastases (<i>P</i> = 0.048), high NLR (<i>P</i> = 0.03), and high IBI (<i>P</i> < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, high IBI (<i>P</i> = 0.048) was an independent and significant predictor of overall survival. Patients with a high IBI had more postoperative complications compared with those with a low IBI (<i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IBI was a strong predictor for both short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection for CRLM.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251313993"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142942599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Surgeon
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1