Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1177/00031348251383479
Forrest Bohler, Kongkrit Chaiyasate
This perspective examines recent legislation in multiple U.S. states that allows foreign-trained physicians (FTPs) to obtain medical licensure without completing an ACGME-accredited residency or fellowship. While these laws aim to address physician shortages, they raise important concerns for surgical education and patient care. The article outlines how current licensure pathways lack mechanisms to verify equivalence of international training and may disrupt residency and fellowship training. Moreover, although the policies are framed as rural workforce solutions, most provisional license placements occur in urban academic centers, with no mandate for rural service. Further, the article highlights risks to informed consent, noting that patients may unknowingly receive surgical care from providers who did not complete U.S.-based training, a fact not currently subject to mandatory disclosure. Ultimately, the article calls for greater oversight, transparency, and alignment of these policies with educational and ethical standards to ensure they do not compromise the quality of surgical care.
{"title":"Foreign-Trained Surgeons and State Residency Bypass Laws.","authors":"Forrest Bohler, Kongkrit Chaiyasate","doi":"10.1177/00031348251383479","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251383479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This perspective examines recent legislation in multiple U.S. states that allows foreign-trained physicians (FTPs) to obtain medical licensure without completing an ACGME-accredited residency or fellowship. While these laws aim to address physician shortages, they raise important concerns for surgical education and patient care. The article outlines how current licensure pathways lack mechanisms to verify equivalence of international training and may disrupt residency and fellowship training. Moreover, although the policies are framed as rural workforce solutions, most provisional license placements occur in urban academic centers, with no mandate for rural service. Further, the article highlights risks to informed consent, noting that patients may unknowingly receive surgical care from providers who did not complete U.S.-based training, a fact not currently subject to mandatory disclosure. Ultimately, the article calls for greater oversight, transparency, and alignment of these policies with educational and ethical standards to ensure they do not compromise the quality of surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1043-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145147500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-04DOI: 10.1177/00031348251387151
Arjun Chaturvedi, Oh Jin Kwon, Nam Yong Cho, Nguyen Le, Dariush Yalzadeh, Daniel Tabibian, Barzin Badiee, Ashkan Moazzez, Peyman Benharash
BackgroundComponent separation technique (CST) has emerged as a novel surgical strategy in the management of large and complex hernia defects. Although prior work has associated CST with decreased hernia recurrence and improved clinical outcomes, the impact of hospital-level variation in component separation utilization remains understudied.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study investigated the impact of operative volume on outcomes in patients undergoing CST. All adult (≥18 years) records for elective CST procedures were tabulated using the 2016-2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hospitals ranked in the top quartile of annual CST volume were defined as high-volume hospitals (HVH; others LVH, MVH, and MHVH). Multivariable regression models were developed to characterize the association between HVH status and outcomes of interest.ResultsOf an estimated 12 720 patients undergoing component separation, 3359 (26.3%) underwent treatment at HVH. Although CST utilization increased significantly over the study period, the total number of high-volume centers remained relatively stable. Additionally, Medicaid recipient status, lowest income quartile, and treatment at rural hospitals were all associated with lower odds of component separation use. Following comprehensive risk adjustment, HVH status was associated with decreased odds of major adverse events (AOR [adjusted odds ratio] 0.75, 95% CI [0.61, 0.91], P = 0.003). However, the HVH cohort had similar resource utilization compared to their LVH, MVH, and MHVH counterparts.DiscussionHigher CST hospital volume was linked with improved clinical outcomes without increased resource utilization. Persistent disparities in component separation utilization highlight the need for protocol standardization and expanded access to specialized surgical care nationally.
背景成分分离技术(CST)已成为一种新的手术策略,用于治疗大而复杂的疝缺损。尽管先前的研究已将CST与减少疝复发和改善临床结果联系起来,但医院水平差异对组分分离利用的影响仍未得到充分研究。方法本回顾性队列研究探讨手术体积对CST患者预后的影响。所有选择性CST手术的成人(≥18岁)记录使用2016-2021年全国再入院数据库制成表格。年度CST业务量排名前四分之一的医院被定义为高业务量医院(HVH;其他为LVH、MVH和MHVH)。建立了多变量回归模型来描述HVH状态与相关结果之间的关系。结果在12720例接受成分分离的患者中,3359例(26.3%)在HVH接受了治疗。尽管在研究期间,CST的利用率显著增加,但高容量中心的总数保持相对稳定。此外,医疗补助接受者状态、最低收入四分位数和在农村医院的治疗都与较低的成分分离使用几率相关。综合风险调整后,HVH状态与主要不良事件发生率降低相关(AOR[校正优势比]0.75,95% CI [0.61, 0.91], P = 0.003)。然而,与LVH、MVH和MHVH组相比,HVH组的资源利用率相似。在不增加资源利用率的情况下,较高的CST医院容量与改善的临床结果相关。组分分离利用的持续差异突出了协议标准化和扩大全国专科外科护理的必要性。
{"title":"Impact of Operative Volume on Outcomes of Component Separation in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.","authors":"Arjun Chaturvedi, Oh Jin Kwon, Nam Yong Cho, Nguyen Le, Dariush Yalzadeh, Daniel Tabibian, Barzin Badiee, Ashkan Moazzez, Peyman Benharash","doi":"10.1177/00031348251387151","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251387151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundComponent separation technique (CST) has emerged as a novel surgical strategy in the management of large and complex hernia defects. Although prior work has associated CST with decreased hernia recurrence and improved clinical outcomes, the impact of hospital-level variation in component separation utilization remains understudied.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study investigated the impact of operative volume on outcomes in patients undergoing CST. All adult (≥18 years) records for elective CST procedures were tabulated using the 2016-2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hospitals ranked in the top quartile of annual CST volume were defined as high-volume hospitals (HVH; others LVH, MVH, and MHVH). Multivariable regression models were developed to characterize the association between HVH status and outcomes of interest.ResultsOf an estimated 12 720 patients undergoing component separation, 3359 (26.3%) underwent treatment at HVH. Although CST utilization increased significantly over the study period, the total number of high-volume centers remained relatively stable. Additionally, Medicaid recipient status, lowest income quartile, and treatment at rural hospitals were all associated with lower odds of component separation use. Following comprehensive risk adjustment, HVH status was associated with decreased odds of major adverse events (AOR [adjusted odds ratio] 0.75, 95% CI [0.61, 0.91], <i>P</i> = 0.003). However, the HVH cohort had similar resource utilization compared to their LVH, MVH, and MHVH counterparts.DiscussionHigher CST hospital volume was linked with improved clinical outcomes without increased resource utilization. Persistent disparities in component separation utilization highlight the need for protocol standardization and expanded access to specialized surgical care nationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"898-906"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145224852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1177/00031348251387153
Zoha Asghar, Zubaid Moazzam Sheikh, Kanza Sharaf, Muhammad Amaan Nadeem, Sheraz Ali, Luciano Mignini, Khalid S Khan
Background: Primary surgery in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been a subject of debate in part due to the heterogeneity of the results of individual studies. We synthesized evidence from the existing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of primary surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in MBC. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov and gray literature till January 2025. Included were RCTs among patients with MBC for whom outcome data on HRQOL was reported. Results: Of the 1019 records screened, four RCTs (961 patients) were included. The risk of bias was high in one RCT and moderate in three. Four HRQoL tools were deployed. Three moderate-quality RCTs measured HRQoL specifically at 18 months: One was in favor of surgery (BR23 18.7 vs. 10.0, P = 0.009), one showed no difference (BR23 10.4 vs. 12.0, P = 0.45), and one was in favor of avoiding surgery (FACT-B 74.2 vs. 68.0, P = 0.005). Two moderate-quality RCTs measured HRQoL generically at 18 months: None showed any difference (C30 64.7 vs. 60.0, P = 0.3 and C30 63.5 vs 68.7, P = 0.2). One low-quality RCT measured HRQoL generically at 36 months: It showed no difference (SF-12 40.8 vs. 43.4, P = 0.34). Primary surgery improved specific HRQoL at 18 months in one study and deteriorated in another, compared to non-surgical treatment, among moderate-quality trials. Conclusion: The pros and cons of surgery as a palliative option should be considered in shared decision-making for improving life quality among individual patients.
背景:转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的原发性手术一直是一个有争议的话题,部分原因是由于个体研究结果的异质性。我们综合了现有随机临床试验(RCTs)的证据来评估原发性手术对MBC患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。方法:我们检索PubMed, Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(Central),谷歌Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov和灰色文献,直到2025年1月。纳入了报道了HRQOL结果数据的MBC患者的随机对照试验。结果:在筛选的1019条记录中,纳入了4项rct(961例患者)。一项RCT的偏倚风险高,三项的偏倚风险中等。部署了四个HRQoL工具。三个中等质量的随机对照试验在18个月时特别测量了HRQoL:一个赞成手术(BR23 18.7比10.0,P = 0.009),一个没有显示差异(BR23 10.4比12.0,P = 0.45),一个赞成避免手术(FACT-B 74.2比68.0,P = 0.005)。两个中等质量的rct在18个月时一般测量HRQoL:没有显示任何差异(C30 64.7 vs 60.0, P = 0.3和C30 63.5 vs 68.7, P = 0.2)。一项低质量的RCT一般在36个月时测量HRQoL:结果没有差异(SF-12 40.8 vs. 43.4, P = 0.34)。在中等质量的试验中,与非手术治疗相比,在一项研究中,初级手术改善了18个月时的特定HRQoL,而在另一项研究中则恶化了。结论:在共同决策时应考虑手术作为姑息手段的利弊,以提高个体患者的生活质量。
{"title":"Effect of Primary Surgery on Health-Related Quality of Life in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of RCT's.","authors":"Zoha Asghar, Zubaid Moazzam Sheikh, Kanza Sharaf, Muhammad Amaan Nadeem, Sheraz Ali, Luciano Mignini, Khalid S Khan","doi":"10.1177/00031348251387153","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251387153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Primary surgery in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been a subject of debate in part due to the heterogeneity of the results of individual studies. We synthesized evidence from the existing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of primary surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in MBC. <b>Methods:</b> We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov and gray literature till January 2025. Included were RCTs among patients with MBC for whom outcome data on HRQOL was reported. <b>Results:</b> Of the 1019 records screened, four RCTs (961 patients) were included. The risk of bias was high in one RCT and moderate in three. Four HRQoL tools were deployed. Three moderate-quality RCTs measured HRQoL specifically at 18 months: One was in favor of surgery (BR23 18.7 vs. 10.0, <i>P</i> = 0.009), one showed no difference (BR23 10.4 vs. 12.0, <i>P</i> = 0.45), and one was in favor of avoiding surgery (FACT-B 74.2 vs. 68.0, <i>P</i> = 0.005). Two moderate-quality RCTs measured HRQoL generically at 18 months: None showed any difference (C30 64.7 vs. 60.0, <i>P</i> = 0.3 and C30 63.5 vs 68.7, <i>P</i> = 0.2). One low-quality RCT measured HRQoL generically at 36 months: It showed no difference (SF-12 40.8 vs. 43.4, <i>P</i> = 0.34). Primary surgery improved specific HRQoL at 18 months in one study and deteriorated in another, compared to non-surgical treatment, among moderate-quality trials. <b>Conclusion:</b> The pros and cons of surgery as a palliative option should be considered in shared decision-making for improving life quality among individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"962-970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145257155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-03DOI: 10.1177/00031348251405197
Don K Nakayama
The American Surgeon, as the official journal of the Southeastern Surgical Congress (SESC), serves as a central component of the society's educational mission to support the development of surgeons, trainees, and clinical educators across the southeastern United States. Historically, manuscripts originating from annual meeting presentations were reviewed by publication committees rather than through formal peer review. As the journal matured and its citation record and Impact Factor grew in importance, The American Surgeon adopted a uniform policy requiring that all submissions-whether meeting-derived or independently submitted-undergo full anonymized peer review. This transition heightened expectations for scholarly rigor and placed new demands on trainees and clinical faculty whose primary responsibilities often center on education and patient care rather than research.To meet this challenge while preserving the society's educational ethos, the journal introduced a structured Pre-Peer Review (Pre-PR) process grounded in four evaluative elements: Suitability Assessment, Editorial Domain Alignment, Readability and Language Assessment, and Positioning, Contextualization, and Currency. Together, these components provide a pedagogically oriented framework that improves manuscript clarity, coherence, and relevance prior to peer review. Authors receive a concrete revision plan and a concise coaching note that identifies actionable steps for strengthening their work. This approach transforms what might otherwise be a discouraging editorial barrier into a formative experience that enhances the quality of submissions and fosters scholarly growth. By integrating structured coaching with transparent editorial standards, The American Surgeon advances both its mission as a peer-reviewed journal and its longstanding commitment to the educational objectives of the SESC.
{"title":"Peer Review and the Educational Mission of <i>The American Surgeon</i>.","authors":"Don K Nakayama","doi":"10.1177/00031348251405197","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251405197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>The American Surgeon</i>, as the official journal of the Southeastern Surgical Congress (SESC), serves as a central component of the society's educational mission to support the development of surgeons, trainees, and clinical educators across the southeastern United States. Historically, manuscripts originating from annual meeting presentations were reviewed by publication committees rather than through formal peer review. As the journal matured and its citation record and Impact Factor grew in importance, <i>The American Surgeon</i> adopted a uniform policy requiring that all submissions-whether meeting-derived or independently submitted-undergo full anonymized peer review. This transition heightened expectations for scholarly rigor and placed new demands on trainees and clinical faculty whose primary responsibilities often center on education and patient care rather than research.To meet this challenge while preserving the society's educational ethos, the journal introduced a structured Pre-Peer Review (Pre-PR) process grounded in four evaluative elements: Suitability Assessment, Editorial Domain Alignment, Readability and Language Assessment, and Positioning, Contextualization, and Currency. Together, these components provide a pedagogically oriented framework that improves manuscript clarity, coherence, and relevance prior to peer review. Authors receive a concrete revision plan and a concise coaching note that identifies actionable steps for strengthening their work. This approach transforms what might otherwise be a discouraging editorial barrier into a formative experience that enhances the quality of submissions and fosters scholarly growth. By integrating structured coaching with transparent editorial standards, <i>The American Surgeon</i> advances both its mission as a peer-reviewed journal and its longstanding commitment to the educational objectives of the SESC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"647-651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145666871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-18DOI: 10.1177/00031348251381654
Jiantao Zhang, Xiaonu Peng, Zheng Zhang
BackgroundPulmonary benign metastasizing leiomyoma (PBML), characterized by histologically benign lung metastases from uterine leiomyomas, represents a rare hormone-dependent entity with enigmatic pathogenesis. The aim of the study was to define the clinical-radiological features and therapeutic management of pulmonary benign metastasizing leiomyoma.MethodsA total of 115 cases of PBML in women were reviewed, including 105 cases selected from PubMed and 10 cases treated at our institution from 2014 to 2025. Data encompassed clinical history, imaging findings, pathological diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up outcomes. A comprehensive literature review was undertaken. No prospective interventions were performed.ResultsA systematic review identified 105 published PBML cases. Combined with our institutional cohort (n = 10), analysis of 115 patients revealed a median age of 46 years, with bilateral pulmonary nodules present in 68.7% of cases and a history of uterine surgery in 92.1%. Immunohistochemistry consistently showed positivity for smooth muscle markers (90%), estrogen receptor (86.3%), and progesterone receptor (88.2%). Surgical resection of pulmonary lesions was performed in 42.6% (49/115) of patients and was associated with a favorable prognosis, with 85.2% (41/48) of surgically managed patients achieving disease-free status during follow-up.ConclusionPulmonary benign metastasizing leiomyoma is a rare hormone-dependent neoplasm linked to uterine leiomyoma. Pathological verification remains essential for diagnosis. Surgical resection may correlate with favorable outcomes, necessitating long-term recurrence surveillance.
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Diagnostic-Therapeutic Analysis of Pulmonary Benign Metastasizing Leiomyoma: A 10-Case Retrospective Study and Systematic Review.","authors":"Jiantao Zhang, Xiaonu Peng, Zheng Zhang","doi":"10.1177/00031348251381654","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251381654","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPulmonary benign metastasizing leiomyoma (PBML), characterized by histologically benign lung metastases from uterine leiomyomas, represents a rare hormone-dependent entity with enigmatic pathogenesis. The aim of the study was to define the clinical-radiological features and therapeutic management of pulmonary benign metastasizing leiomyoma.MethodsA total of 115 cases of PBML in women were reviewed, including 105 cases selected from PubMed and 10 cases treated at our institution from 2014 to 2025. Data encompassed clinical history, imaging findings, pathological diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up outcomes. A comprehensive literature review was undertaken. No prospective interventions were performed.ResultsA systematic review identified 105 published PBML cases. Combined with our institutional cohort (n = 10), analysis of 115 patients revealed a median age of 46 years, with bilateral pulmonary nodules present in 68.7% of cases and a history of uterine surgery in 92.1%. Immunohistochemistry consistently showed positivity for smooth muscle markers (90%), estrogen receptor (86.3%), and progesterone receptor (88.2%). Surgical resection of pulmonary lesions was performed in 42.6% (49/115) of patients and was associated with a favorable prognosis, with 85.2% (41/48) of surgically managed patients achieving disease-free status during follow-up.ConclusionPulmonary benign metastasizing leiomyoma is a rare hormone-dependent neoplasm linked to uterine leiomyoma. Pathological verification remains essential for diagnosis. Surgical resection may correlate with favorable outcomes, necessitating long-term recurrence surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"730-739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145084956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1177/00031348251378900
Shengxiang Hou, Yunrong Liu, Yichen Fan, Xueying Zhou, Yang Du
Objectiveto compare the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery and traditional open surgery in living donor liver hepatectomy.MethodsThis meta-analysis included 9 retrospective studies involving a total of 3379 patients, evaluating the primary and secondary outcomes of robotic surgery versus open surgery in donors and recipients. Binary variables were analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while continuous variables were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CI.ResultsRobotic donor hepatectomy demonstrated significantly longer operative time (SMD = 1.26, 95% CI 0.75-1.76, I2 = 90.1%) and warm ischemia time (SMD = 2.24, 95% CI 0.94-3.53, I2 = 97.4%) compared to open surgery, both with moderate certainty. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -0.61, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.07), postoperative hospital stay (SMD = -0.36, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.07), overall Clavien-Dindo grades 1-2 complications (OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.15), grades 3-4 complications (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.44-3.99), or bile leakage incidence (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.28-2.47) for donors. For recipients, robotic surgery significantly reduced both grades 1-2 (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.94) and grades 3-4 complications (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.84), while showing comparable perioperative mortality (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.84-2.19), hepatic artery thrombosis (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.64-2.21), and biliary complications (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.52-1.97).ConclusionRobotic living donor right hepatectomy demonstrates comparable donor safety and superior effectiveness in reducing recipient complications.
目的比较机器人手术与传统开放手术在活体肝切除术中的安全性和有效性。方法本荟萃分析纳入9项回顾性研究,共涉及3379例患者,评估机器人手术与开放手术在供体和受体中的主要和次要结局。二元变量采用优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)进行分析,而连续变量采用标准化平均差(SMDs)和95% CI进行分析。结果与开放手术相比,机器人供肝切除术的手术时间(SMD = 1.26, 95% CI 0.75 ~ 1.76, I2 = 90.1%)和热缺血时间(SMD = 2.24, 95% CI 0.94 ~ 3.53, I2 = 97.4%)均有中等确定性。相反,在供者术中出血量(SMD = -0.61, 95% CI -1.29至-0.07)、术后住院时间(SMD = -0.36, 95% CI -0.78至0.07)、Clavien-Dindo总1-2级并发症(OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.15)、3-4级并发症(OR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.44-3.99)或胆漏发生率(OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.28-2.47)方面均无显著差异。对于接受者,机器人手术显著减少了1-2级(OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.94)和3-4级并发症(OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.84),同时显示出相当的围手术期死亡率(OR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.84-2.19)、肝动脉血栓形成(OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.64-2.21)和胆道并发症(OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.52-1.97)。结论机器人活体右肝切除术在减少受体并发症方面具有相当的安全性和优越性。
{"title":"Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Open and Robotic Surgery in Living Right-Donor Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shengxiang Hou, Yunrong Liu, Yichen Fan, Xueying Zhou, Yang Du","doi":"10.1177/00031348251378900","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251378900","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectiveto compare the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery and traditional open surgery in living donor liver hepatectomy.MethodsThis meta-analysis included 9 retrospective studies involving a total of 3379 patients, evaluating the primary and secondary outcomes of robotic surgery versus open surgery in donors and recipients. Binary variables were analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while continuous variables were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CI.ResultsRobotic donor hepatectomy demonstrated significantly longer operative time (SMD = 1.26, 95% CI 0.75-1.76, I<sup>2</sup> = 90.1%) and warm ischemia time (SMD = 2.24, 95% CI 0.94-3.53, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.4%) compared to open surgery, both with moderate certainty. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -0.61, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.07), postoperative hospital stay (SMD = -0.36, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.07), overall Clavien-Dindo grades 1-2 complications (OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.15), grades 3-4 complications (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.44-3.99), or bile leakage incidence (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.28-2.47) for donors. For recipients, robotic surgery significantly reduced both grades 1-2 (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.94) and grades 3-4 complications (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.84), while showing comparable perioperative mortality (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.84-2.19), hepatic artery thrombosis (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.64-2.21), and biliary complications (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.52-1.97).ConclusionRobotic living donor right hepatectomy demonstrates comparable donor safety and superior effectiveness in reducing recipient complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"833-839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/00031348251385114
Andrew Shin, Stephanie Mueller, William R Boysen, Alex S Keuroghlian
This article argues for universal adoption of gender-inclusive language in surgical care as a cornerstone of patient-centered practice. Despite evidence of mental health benefits from gender-affirming care, affirming language remains inconsistent, limited by inadequate training, rushed perioperative encounters, and absent institutional protocols. We present a practical framework for integrating inclusive language, including neutral greetings and de-gendered anatomical terms. These practices reduce misgendering and strengthen patient-provider rapport across all patients. We further call for systemic reforms in residency training, education, and institutional accountability. These changes are critical to upholding standards of equitable surgical practice amid current legislative threats to gender-affirming care.
{"title":"Applying Gender-Inclusive Language in Surgical Care.","authors":"Andrew Shin, Stephanie Mueller, William R Boysen, Alex S Keuroghlian","doi":"10.1177/00031348251385114","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251385114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article argues for universal adoption of gender-inclusive language in surgical care as a cornerstone of patient-centered practice. Despite evidence of mental health benefits from gender-affirming care, affirming language remains inconsistent, limited by inadequate training, rushed perioperative encounters, and absent institutional protocols. We present a practical framework for integrating inclusive language, including neutral greetings and de-gendered anatomical terms. These practices reduce misgendering and strengthen patient-provider rapport across all patients. We further call for systemic reforms in residency training, education, and institutional accountability. These changes are critical to upholding standards of equitable surgical practice amid current legislative threats to gender-affirming care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1046-1049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145197882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1177/00031348251387157
Victoria Morgan, Luke Bauerle, Noah Nawabi, Thomas Eckert, Rishishankar Suresh, Tyler Vasas, Habib Emil Rafka, Brian Saway, Kaitlyn Boggs, Stephen Kalhorn
BackgroundDespite the reported rise in both golf cart (GC) usage and associated trauma in the United States, epidemiologic data describing their neurological impact is scarce. This study aims to describe the incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of GC-associated head trauma in patients requiring neurosurgical consultation.MethodsPatients at a single institution admitted for GC-related head trauma requiring neurosurgical consultation between November 2013 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and described.ResultsA total of 97 patients were identified. Most patients presented with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission of 13 to 15 (93.81%) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 (91.75%). The most common reported mechanism of injury was fall or jump from a moving GC (73.20%) and the most common diagnosis was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (57.73%). Five total patients (5.15%) required neurosurgical intervention with only one patient (1.03%) expiring secondary to their trauma. 94.85% of patients (n = 92) were discharged with mRS scores ranging from 0 to 2. Univariate linear regression analyses demonstrated that patient age, presenting GCS, admission mRS score of 3-6, alcohol intoxication, presence of intracranial bleed, and LOC were predictors of hospital LOS. Necessitation of neurosurgical intervention was significantly associated only with admission mRS between 3 and 6.DiscussionGC-related neurotrauma poses a serious yet potentially preventable health concern to drivers and bystanders alike. Policies regarding seatbelt usage and safety measures for GCs continue to vary widely state-to-state and require data to inform decisions. This is the largest study to-date evaluating the incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of GC-associated neurotrauma.
{"title":"Incidence, Mechanisms of Injury, and Outcomes of Golf Cart-Related Head Trauma: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Victoria Morgan, Luke Bauerle, Noah Nawabi, Thomas Eckert, Rishishankar Suresh, Tyler Vasas, Habib Emil Rafka, Brian Saway, Kaitlyn Boggs, Stephen Kalhorn","doi":"10.1177/00031348251387157","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251387157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDespite the reported rise in both golf cart (GC) usage and associated trauma in the United States, epidemiologic data describing their neurological impact is scarce. This study aims to describe the incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of GC-associated head trauma in patients requiring neurosurgical consultation.MethodsPatients at a single institution admitted for GC-related head trauma requiring neurosurgical consultation between November 2013 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and described.ResultsA total of 97 patients were identified. Most patients presented with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission of 13 to 15 (93.81%) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 (91.75%). The most common reported mechanism of injury was fall or jump from a moving GC (73.20%) and the most common diagnosis was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (57.73%). Five total patients (5.15%) required neurosurgical intervention with only one patient (1.03%) expiring secondary to their trauma. 94.85% of patients (n = 92) were discharged with mRS scores ranging from 0 to 2. Univariate linear regression analyses demonstrated that patient age, presenting GCS, admission mRS score of 3<i>-</i>6, alcohol intoxication, presence of intracranial bleed, and LOC were predictors of hospital LOS. Necessitation of neurosurgical intervention was significantly associated only with admission mRS between 3 and 6.DiscussionGC-related neurotrauma poses a serious yet potentially preventable health concern to drivers and bystanders alike. Policies regarding seatbelt usage and safety measures for GCs continue to vary widely state-to-state and require data to inform decisions. This is the largest study to-date evaluating the incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of GC-associated neurotrauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"891-897"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1177/00031348251391849
Melissa E Chen, Emmanouil Giorgakis, Esteban Calderon, Sorabh Kapoor, Alexander H Toledo, Chirag S Desai
Despite a record number of solid organs transplanted in 2023, ongoing issues with donor shortages leave thousands of people in the United States waiting. Increased utilization of donors after circulatory death (DCD) has been the primary driver of the increase in total transplants. Availability of newer technologies including normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), and hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) have been shown to attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury and allow for graft viability assessment prior to implantation. Outcomes across all solid organs, especially in higher risk donors, have improved using machine perfusion to decrease rates of primary non-function and damage related to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Here, we present an overview of deceased donation practices across all solid organs.
{"title":"Deceased Donor Organ Donation in the United States: A Review of Current Practices and Future Directions.","authors":"Melissa E Chen, Emmanouil Giorgakis, Esteban Calderon, Sorabh Kapoor, Alexander H Toledo, Chirag S Desai","doi":"10.1177/00031348251391849","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251391849","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a record number of solid organs transplanted in 2023, ongoing issues with donor shortages leave thousands of people in the United States waiting. Increased utilization of donors after circulatory death (DCD) has been the primary driver of the increase in total transplants. Availability of newer technologies including normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), and hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) have been shown to attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury and allow for graft viability assessment prior to implantation. Outcomes across all solid organs, especially in higher risk donors, have improved using machine perfusion to decrease rates of primary non-function and damage related to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Here, we present an overview of deceased donation practices across all solid organs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"982-990"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145342798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1177/00031348251397597
Niruktha Raghavan, Prem C Patel, David Limon, Miranda X Morris, Jason W Kempenich, Aashish Rajesh
In the rapidly advancing landscape of surgical education, the traditional apprenticeship model is being increasingly complemented by individualized learning, competency-based assessment, and data-driven feedback. Work-hour restrictions, administrative burdens, and limited operative exposure have intensified the need for innovative solutions to supplement faculty-led training. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising adjunct, offering scalable platforms for technical skill acquisition, personalized feedback, and structured progress tracking. Early applications include AI-guided simulation, feedback, natural language processing for resident evaluation, and advanced applicant-screening systems, which hold the potential to streamline holistic review while reducing faculty workload. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, including bias mitigation, ethical data governance, and the need for rigorous outcome-based validation. The greatest promise lies in hybrid models, where AI augments rather than replaces mentorship, freeing faculty for complex, context-dependent teaching. With careful implementation, AI is poised to meaningfully transform surgical education worldwide.
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Education: A 2025 Update on Adaptive Training, Feedback, and Competency-Based Education.","authors":"Niruktha Raghavan, Prem C Patel, David Limon, Miranda X Morris, Jason W Kempenich, Aashish Rajesh","doi":"10.1177/00031348251397597","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251397597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the rapidly advancing landscape of surgical education, the traditional apprenticeship model is being increasingly complemented by individualized learning, competency-based assessment, and data-driven feedback. Work-hour restrictions, administrative burdens, and limited operative exposure have intensified the need for innovative solutions to supplement faculty-led training. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising adjunct, offering scalable platforms for technical skill acquisition, personalized feedback, and structured progress tracking. Early applications include AI-guided simulation, feedback, natural language processing for resident evaluation, and advanced applicant-screening systems, which hold the potential to streamline holistic review while reducing faculty workload. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, including bias mitigation, ethical data governance, and the need for rigorous outcome-based validation. The greatest promise lies in hybrid models, where AI augments rather than replaces mentorship, freeing faculty for complex, context-dependent teaching. With careful implementation, AI is poised to meaningfully transform surgical education worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"675-686"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145487405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}