首页 > 最新文献

American Surgeon最新文献

英文 中文
Early Resuscitation of Patients With Non-exsanguinating Trauma Using Packed Red Blood Cells Versus Low-Volume Crystalloids: Have We Gone Too Far? 非失血创伤患者早期复苏使用填充红细胞与小体积晶体:我们走得太远了吗?
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251371192
Corrado P Marini, Patrizio Petrone, John McNelis

The early resuscitation of patients with mild to moderate non-exsanguinating trauma has shifted from the conventional use of one to two liters of crystalloids to the use of one to two units of PRBC. This evolution assumes that the transfusion of PRBC is superior to the administration of any volume of crystalloids because of the propensity of crystalloids to migrate from the intravascular to the interstitial space leading to organ dysfunction, organ failure, and worse outcomes. However, the premise of the fluid migration relies on Starling original model of fluid exchange between the hydrostatic and oncotic pressure without considering whether the endothelial surface glycocalyx (ESG) is affected by the degree of traumatic insult and by the duration and depth of hypotension. It fails to account for the changes that occur to the PRBC during storage from the standpoint of off-loading of oxygen and the ability to negotiate the microcirculation. This review explores the impact of the burden of trauma and hemorrhage on the ESG, the changes to the RBCs that occur during storage, particularly their diminished capacity to offload oxygen and to negotiate low-shear microvascular districts, leading to failure to improve oxygen consumption despite the increase in oxygen delivery. We argue that the recent trend toward early resuscitation with one to two units of PRBC rather that low-volume crystalloids, in patients with non-exsanguinating mild to moderate trauma lacks sufficient justification.

轻度至中度非失血创伤患者的早期复苏已从传统的使用1至2升晶体剂转变为使用1至2单位的PRBC。这种进化假设输血PRBC优于任何体积的晶体,因为晶体倾向于从血管内迁移到间质空间,导致器官功能障碍、器官衰竭和更糟糕的结果。然而,液体迁移的前提依赖于Starling原始的流体静压与肿瘤压力之间的流体交换模型,而没有考虑内皮表面糖萼(ESG)是否受创伤损伤程度、低血压持续时间和深度的影响。它不能解释在储存过程中发生的变化,从氧的卸载和微循环协商能力的角度来看。这篇综述探讨了创伤和出血负担对ESG的影响,红细胞在储存过程中发生的变化,特别是它们卸载氧气和通过低剪切微血管区域的能力下降,导致尽管氧气输送增加,但未能改善氧气消耗。我们认为,对于非失血的轻中度创伤患者,最近倾向于使用1 - 2单位的PRBC而不是小体积晶体物进行早期复苏的趋势缺乏充分的理由。
{"title":"Early Resuscitation of Patients With Non-exsanguinating Trauma Using Packed Red Blood Cells Versus Low-Volume Crystalloids: Have We Gone Too Far?","authors":"Corrado P Marini, Patrizio Petrone, John McNelis","doi":"10.1177/00031348251371192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251371192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The early resuscitation of patients with mild to moderate non-exsanguinating trauma has shifted from the conventional use of one to two liters of crystalloids to the use of one to two units of PRBC. This evolution assumes that the transfusion of PRBC is superior to the administration of any volume of crystalloids because of the propensity of crystalloids to migrate from the intravascular to the interstitial space leading to organ dysfunction, organ failure, and worse outcomes. However, the premise of the fluid migration relies on Starling original model of fluid exchange between the hydrostatic and oncotic pressure without considering whether the endothelial surface glycocalyx (ESG) is affected by the degree of traumatic insult and by the duration and depth of hypotension. It fails to account for the changes that occur to the PRBC during storage from the standpoint of off-loading of oxygen and the ability to negotiate the microcirculation. This review explores the impact of the burden of trauma and hemorrhage on the ESG, the changes to the RBCs that occur during storage, particularly their diminished capacity to offload oxygen and to negotiate low-shear microvascular districts, leading to failure to improve oxygen consumption despite the increase in oxygen delivery. We argue that the recent trend toward early resuscitation with one to two units of PRBC rather that low-volume crystalloids, in patients with non-exsanguinating mild to moderate trauma lacks sufficient justification.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":"92 2","pages":"568-575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic Review of Ischiatic Hernia: Diagnostic Challenges, Surgical Evolution, and Outcomes. 坐骨疝的系统回顾:诊断挑战、手术进展和结果。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251378904
Fahim Kanani, Khaled Otman, Alaa Zahalka, Naheel Mahajna, Narmin Zoabi, Katia Dayan, Nir Messer

IntroductionIschiatic (sciatic) hernias represent one of the rarest forms of pelvic floor herniation, with fewer than 100 documented cases worldwide since first described by Papen in 1750. Their rarity, combined with often-cryptic clinical presentation, contributes to significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 1947 to 2024, identifying 68 relevant articles. Our search strategy combined terms related to ischiatic/sciatic hernias with various publication types. Data extraction focused on patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, hernia contents, surgical approaches, and outcomes.ResultsOur analysis revealed striking female predominance (98.5%), particularly among elderly patients (mean age 71 ± 12.8 years). Ureter was the most commonly herniated structure (58.8%), followed by small intestine (20.6%). Most patients (80.9%) lacked an external gluteal bulge, contributing to diagnostic delays. CT emerged as the primary diagnostic modality (63.2%), with the pathognomonic "curlicue sign" representing a key feature in ureterosciatic herniation. Management approaches were evenly distributed between minimally invasive techniques (35.3%), open surgery (35.3%), and conservative management with ureteral stenting (29.4%). Laparoscopic and robotic approaches demonstrated shorter hospital stays (1-2 days vs 5-14 days for open repairs) and reduced postoperative pain, despite slightly longer operative times. Complication rates were low (5.9% surgical site infections), with no reported mortality.ConclusionIschiatic hernias require a high index of clinical suspicion for timely diagnosis, particularly in elderly females presenting with unexplained pelvic or sciatic pain. The evolution from open to minimally invasive surgical approaches has significantly transformed management outcomes, while ureteral stenting offers an alternative for high-risk patients with ureterosciatic hernias. The optimal approach remains individualized based on patient characteristics, hernia contents, and available surgical expertise.

坐骨(坐骨)疝是骨盆底疝最罕见的形式之一,自1750年Papen首次描述以来,全世界记录的病例不到100例。它们的罕见性,加上临床表现往往模糊不清,给诊断和治疗带来了重大挑战。方法遵循PRISMA指南,系统检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane数据库,从1947年到2024年,确定了68篇相关文章。我们的搜索策略将与坐骨/坐骨疝相关的术语与各种出版物类型相结合。数据提取的重点是患者人口统计学、临床表现、诊断方法、疝内容物、手术入路和结果。结果我们的分析显示明显的女性优势(98.5%),特别是在老年患者中(平均年龄71±12.8岁)。输尿管是最常见的疝出部位(58.8%),其次是小肠(20.6%)。大多数患者(80.9%)缺乏臀外隆起,导致诊断延迟。CT是输尿管神经疝的主要诊断方式(63.2%),典型的“曲线征”是输尿管神经神经疝的主要特征。治疗方法平均分布在微创技术(35.3%)、开放手术(35.3%)和输尿管支架置入术(29.4%)。腹腔镜和机器人入路的住院时间较短(1-2天,而开放修复为5-14天),尽管手术时间稍长,但术后疼痛减轻。并发症发生率低(手术部位感染5.9%),无死亡报告。结论坐骨疝需要高度的临床怀疑才能及时诊断,特别是老年女性出现不明原因的骨盆或坐骨疼痛。从开放手术到微创手术的发展已经显著地改变了治疗结果,而输尿管支架置入术为输尿管坐骨疝高危患者提供了另一种选择。最佳的方法仍然是根据患者的特点、疝内容物和可用的外科专业知识进行个体化治疗。
{"title":"Systematic Review of Ischiatic Hernia: Diagnostic Challenges, Surgical Evolution, and Outcomes.","authors":"Fahim Kanani, Khaled Otman, Alaa Zahalka, Naheel Mahajna, Narmin Zoabi, Katia Dayan, Nir Messer","doi":"10.1177/00031348251378904","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251378904","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionIschiatic (sciatic) hernias represent one of the rarest forms of pelvic floor herniation, with fewer than 100 documented cases worldwide since first described by Papen in 1750. Their rarity, combined with often-cryptic clinical presentation, contributes to significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 1947 to 2024, identifying 68 relevant articles. Our search strategy combined terms related to ischiatic/sciatic hernias with various publication types. Data extraction focused on patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, hernia contents, surgical approaches, and outcomes.ResultsOur analysis revealed striking female predominance (98.5%), particularly among elderly patients (mean age 71 ± 12.8 years). Ureter was the most commonly herniated structure (58.8%), followed by small intestine (20.6%). Most patients (80.9%) lacked an external gluteal bulge, contributing to diagnostic delays. CT emerged as the primary diagnostic modality (63.2%), with the pathognomonic \"curlicue sign\" representing a key feature in ureterosciatic herniation. Management approaches were evenly distributed between minimally invasive techniques (35.3%), open surgery (35.3%), and conservative management with ureteral stenting (29.4%). Laparoscopic and robotic approaches demonstrated shorter hospital stays (1-2 days vs 5-14 days for open repairs) and reduced postoperative pain, despite slightly longer operative times. Complication rates were low (5.9% surgical site infections), with no reported mortality.ConclusionIschiatic hernias require a high index of clinical suspicion for timely diagnosis, particularly in elderly females presenting with unexplained pelvic or sciatic pain. The evolution from open to minimally invasive surgical approaches has significantly transformed management outcomes, while ureteral stenting offers an alternative for high-risk patients with ureterosciatic hernias. The optimal approach remains individualized based on patient characteristics, hernia contents, and available surgical expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"609-618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145090861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-Incision versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Superior Long-Term Weight Maintenance in a 7-Year Matched Cohort Study. 单切口与传统腹腔镜袖胃切除术:7年匹配队列研究的长期体重维持优势。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251378955
Fahim Kanani, Chaled Alnakib, Shani Shelly, Shachar Laks, Eyal Leibovitz, Firas Abu Akar, Moshe Kamar, Mohamad Jazmawi, Mordechai Shimonov

BackgroundLong-term weight regain affects 20%-30% of patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We investigated whether single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS) provides superior weight maintenance compared to conventional multi-port LSG.MethodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data comparing 54 propensity-matched patients (27 SILS and 27 conventional LSG) operated between 2010 and 2017. Primary outcome was weight maintenance at 7 years. Secondary outcomes included safety profile, complications, quality of life, and patient satisfaction.ResultsGroups were comparable except baseline BMI (SILS: 40.17 ± 3.23 vs conventional: 43.71 ± 5.36 kg/m2, P = .005). Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy demonstrated safety non-inferiority with no conversions, leaks, or reoperations in either group. Overall complications: 11.1% SILS vs 3.7% conventional (P = .308). At 7 years, SILS patients maintained significantly lower absolute weight (75.56 ± 13.24 vs 85.26 ± 19.78 kg, P = .039) despite similar %EWL (85.2% vs 92.6%, P = .396). Weight regain from nadir was 11.26 ± 9.24 vs 15.04 ± 14.10 kg (P = .250). Enhanced patient satisfaction scores in SILS (9.56 ± 0.93 vs 8.07 ± 1.90, P = 0.001) suggest a potential mediating mechanism.ConclusionsSingle-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy achieves superior long-term weight maintenance while demonstrating safety non-inferiority compared to conventional LSG. The technique resulted in 10 kg lower absolute weight at 7 years without increased complications. For appropriately selected patients, SILS offers a safe alternative with improved long-term metabolic outcomes.

背景:20%-30%的腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)后患者出现长期体重恢复。我们研究了单切口腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(SILS)是否比传统的多切口胃切除术(LSG)提供更好的体重维持。方法回顾性分析2010年至2017年54例倾向匹配患者(27例SILS和27例常规LSG)的前瞻性数据。主要终点是7年时的体重维持情况。次要结局包括安全性、并发症、生活质量和患者满意度。结果各组间除基线BMI (SILS: 40.17±3.23 vs常规:43.71±5.36 kg/m2, P = 0.005)具有可比性。单切口腹腔镜袖式胃切除术安全性好,无任何组的转换、漏或再手术。总体并发症:11.1% SILS vs 3.7%常规(P = .308)。7年时,尽管%EWL相似(85.2% vs 92.6%, P = 0.396),但SILS患者的绝对体重仍显著降低(75.56±13.24 vs 85.26±19.78 kg, P = 0.039)。体重从最低点恢复为11.26±9.24 vs 15.04±14.10 kg (P = 0.250)。SILS患者满意度得分的提高(9.56±0.93 vs 8.07±1.90,P = 0.001)提示可能的中介机制。结论单切口腹腔镜袖式胃切除术与常规胃切除术相比,长期体重维持效果较好,且安全性较好。该技术在7年内使绝对体重降低了10公斤,没有增加并发症。对于适当选择的患者,SILS提供了一种安全的替代方案,改善了长期代谢结果。
{"title":"Single-Incision versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Superior Long-Term Weight Maintenance in a 7-Year Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Fahim Kanani, Chaled Alnakib, Shani Shelly, Shachar Laks, Eyal Leibovitz, Firas Abu Akar, Moshe Kamar, Mohamad Jazmawi, Mordechai Shimonov","doi":"10.1177/00031348251378955","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251378955","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLong-term weight regain affects 20%-30% of patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We investigated whether single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS) provides superior weight maintenance compared to conventional multi-port LSG.MethodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data comparing 54 propensity-matched patients (27 SILS and 27 conventional LSG) operated between 2010 and 2017. Primary outcome was weight maintenance at 7 years. Secondary outcomes included safety profile, complications, quality of life, and patient satisfaction.ResultsGroups were comparable except baseline BMI (SILS: 40.17 ± 3.23 vs conventional: 43.71 ± 5.36 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = .005). Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy demonstrated safety non-inferiority with no conversions, leaks, or reoperations in either group. Overall complications: 11.1% SILS vs 3.7% conventional (<i>P</i> = .308). At 7 years, SILS patients maintained significantly lower absolute weight (75.56 ± 13.24 vs 85.26 ± 19.78 kg, <i>P</i> = .039) despite similar %EWL (85.2% vs 92.6%, <i>P</i> = .396). Weight regain from nadir was 11.26 ± 9.24 vs 15.04 ± 14.10 kg (<i>P</i> = .250). Enhanced patient satisfaction scores in SILS (9.56 ± 0.93 vs 8.07 ± 1.90, <i>P</i> = 0.001) suggest a potential mediating mechanism.ConclusionsSingle-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy achieves superior long-term weight maintenance while demonstrating safety non-inferiority compared to conventional LSG. The technique resulted in 10 kg lower absolute weight at 7 years without increased complications. For appropriately selected patients, SILS offers a safe alternative with improved long-term metabolic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"509-520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145051588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ICG Fluorescence Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Transductal Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients With Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis. ICG荧光胆管造影在既往上腹部手术患者的腹腔镜转导胆总管探查中的应用:倾向评分匹配分析。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-11 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251378916
Wan Zhen, Wu Lei, Wang Xuzhen

Background: Previous upper abdominal surgeries (PUAS) hamper the identification and dissection of the common bile duct (CBD) during laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence cholangiography enables the real-time identification of extrahepatic bile ducts. However, the tissue penetration of ICG fluorescence is limited. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of ICG fluorescence-guided LCBDE in patients with PUAS.

Methods: A total of 176 patients who underwent either conventional LCBDE (n = 99) or ICG-guided LCBDE (n = 77) were enrolled in the study. A 1:1 matched, propensity score-matched analysis was performed using the following factors: gender, age, BMI, ASA score, CBD diameter, number of CBD stones, and previous surgical approach. The surgical outcomes of the two groups were compared.

Results: A well-balanced cohort of 122 patients was analyzed (n = 61 in the conventional group and n = 61 in the ICG group). The incidence of positive fluorescence in patients with PUAS was 88.5%. Time of CBD identification and total surgical duration were shorter in the ICG group with less intraoperative blood loss compared to the conventional group. There was no significant difference in the time of drainage tube extraction, conversion rate to open surgery, and intraoperative complication incidence between the two groups. Patients in the ICG group exhibited faster postoperative recovery, milder inflammatory responses, and reduced overall postoperative complication rate.

Conclusions: ICG fluorescence cholangiography contributes to faster identification of CBD, improved postoperative recovery, and fewer postoperative complications in patients with PUAS.

背景:以往的上腹部手术(PUAS)阻碍了腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)时对胆总管(CBD)的识别和剥离。吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光胆管造影能够实时识别肝外胆管。然而,ICG荧光的组织穿透是有限的。本研究的目的是评估ICG荧光引导下LCBDE治疗PUAS患者的可行性和有效性。方法:共有176例患者接受了常规LCBDE (n = 99)或icg引导下的LCBDE (n = 77)。使用以下因素进行1:1匹配,倾向评分匹配分析:性别,年龄,BMI, ASA评分,CBD直径,CBD结石数量和既往手术入路。比较两组手术效果。结果:对122例患者进行了均衡的队列分析(常规组n = 61, ICG组n = 61)。PUAS患者荧光阳性发生率为88.5%。ICG组CBD识别时间和总手术时间较常规组短,术中出血量较少。两组患者引流管拔管时间、中转开腹率、术中并发症发生率均无显著差异。ICG组患者术后恢复较快,炎症反应较轻,术后总并发症发生率较低。结论:ICG荧光胆管造影有助于更快识别CBD,改善PUAS患者术后恢复,减少术后并发症。
{"title":"ICG Fluorescence Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Transductal Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients With Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.","authors":"Wan Zhen, Wu Lei, Wang Xuzhen","doi":"10.1177/00031348251378916","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251378916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous upper abdominal surgeries (PUAS) hamper the identification and dissection of the common bile duct (CBD) during laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence cholangiography enables the real-time identification of extrahepatic bile ducts. However, the tissue penetration of ICG fluorescence is limited. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of ICG fluorescence-guided LCBDE in patients with PUAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 176 patients who underwent either conventional LCBDE (n = 99) or ICG-guided LCBDE (n = 77) were enrolled in the study. A 1:1 matched, propensity score-matched analysis was performed using the following factors: gender, age, BMI, ASA score, CBD diameter, number of CBD stones, and previous surgical approach. The surgical outcomes of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A well-balanced cohort of 122 patients was analyzed (n = 61 in the conventional group and n = 61 in the ICG group). The incidence of positive fluorescence in patients with PUAS was 88.5%. Time of CBD identification and total surgical duration were shorter in the ICG group with less intraoperative blood loss compared to the conventional group. There was no significant difference in the time of drainage tube extraction, conversion rate to open surgery, and intraoperative complication incidence between the two groups. Patients in the ICG group exhibited faster postoperative recovery, milder inflammatory responses, and reduced overall postoperative complication rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG fluorescence cholangiography contributes to faster identification of CBD, improved postoperative recovery, and fewer postoperative complications in patients with PUAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"500-508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Utility of Early versus Delayed CXR After Chest Tube Removal. 胸管拔除后早期与延迟CXR的应用。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251372428
Emily H Johnson, Nathan H Schmoekel, Janet S Lee, Valerie Brockman, Thomas J Schroeppel

BackgroundPost-pull chest X-rays (ppCXR) are routinely performed after chest tube (CT) removal despite questionable utility. Prior studies suggest that ppCXR rarely alter management, but the impact of timing remains unknown. This study compares early vs delayed ppCXR on radiographic changes and clinical management in asymptomatic trauma patients. We hypothesized ppCXR timing may influence radiographic findings, but not reintervention rates.MethodsA retrospective study of trauma patients undergoing CT placement and removal at a level 1 trauma center from 2019 to 2022. Each ppCXR was classified as early (≤4 h) or delayed (>4 h). Primary outcome was reintervention after CT removal (CT replacement, VATS, or thoracotomy). Secondary outcomes included radiographic changes, unplanned ICU transfer, hospital and ICU LOS, and total CXRs.Results318 patients were included with a mean age of 47.2 years, 25.2% female, and 77.4% with blunt mechanism. Most had delayed ppCXR (78.3%) with mean delay of 7.2 h (2.3 vs 9.5 h, P < .001). No differences were found in radiographic changes (26.1 vs 29.3%, P = .708) or reintervention (4.3 vs 5.6%, P = .999) between groups. Radiographic changes occurred in 28.6% of ppCXR, but these findings display poor sensitivity (65.0%) and specificity (73.4%) for reintervention. Delayed ppCXR had more ICU transfers (0 vs 5.6%, P = .046), but no differences in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or total CXRs.DiscussionThe timing of ppCXR did not affect detection of radiographic changes or reintervention rates. Our findings support growing evidence questioning routine ppCXR in asymptomatic trauma patients. Future multicenter studies are warranted to establish standardized protocols and reduce unnecessary imaging in trauma care.

拔胸后x光检查(ppCXR)是胸管(CT)摘除后的常规检查,尽管其实用性存在疑问。先前的研究表明ppCXR很少改变管理,但时间的影响尚不清楚。本研究比较了早期和延迟ppCXR对无症状创伤患者的影像学改变和临床处理。我们假设ppCXR的时间可能会影响x线表现,但不会影响再干预率。方法回顾性分析2019年至2022年在某一级创伤中心接受CT置放和移除手术的创伤患者。每个ppCXR分为早期(≤4h)和延迟(≤4h)。主要结局是CT切除后的再干预(CT置换术、VATS或开胸术)。次要结局包括影像学改变、计划外ICU转院、医院和ICU LOS以及总cxr。结果318例患者,平均年龄47.2岁,女性25.2%,钝性机制77.4%。大多数ppCXR延迟(78.3%),平均延迟7.2 h (2.3 vs 9.5 h, P < 0.001)。两组间放射学变化(26.1 vs 29.3%, P = 0.708)或再干预(4.3 vs 5.6%, P = 0.999)无差异。28.6%的ppCXR发生影像学改变,但这些结果显示再干预的敏感性(65.0%)和特异性(73.4%)较差。延迟ppCXR有更多的ICU转院(0比5.6%,P = 0.046),但在医院LOS、ICU LOS或总cxr方面没有差异。ppCXR的时机不影响影像学改变的检测或再干预率。我们的发现支持越来越多的证据质疑常规ppCXR在无症状创伤患者。未来的多中心研究有必要建立标准化的协议,减少创伤护理中不必要的影像。
{"title":"The Utility of Early versus Delayed CXR After Chest Tube Removal.","authors":"Emily H Johnson, Nathan H Schmoekel, Janet S Lee, Valerie Brockman, Thomas J Schroeppel","doi":"10.1177/00031348251372428","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251372428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPost-pull chest X-rays (ppCXR) are routinely performed after chest tube (CT) removal despite questionable utility. Prior studies suggest that ppCXR rarely alter management, but the impact of timing remains unknown. This study compares early vs delayed ppCXR on radiographic changes and clinical management in asymptomatic trauma patients. We hypothesized ppCXR timing may influence radiographic findings, but not reintervention rates.MethodsA retrospective study of trauma patients undergoing CT placement and removal at a level 1 trauma center from 2019 to 2022. Each ppCXR was classified as early (≤4 h) or delayed (>4 h). Primary outcome was reintervention after CT removal (CT replacement, VATS, or thoracotomy). Secondary outcomes included radiographic changes, unplanned ICU transfer, hospital and ICU LOS, and total CXRs.Results318 patients were included with a mean age of 47.2 years, 25.2% female, and 77.4% with blunt mechanism. Most had delayed ppCXR (78.3%) with mean delay of 7.2 h (2.3 vs 9.5 h, <i>P</i> < .001). No differences were found in radiographic changes (26.1 vs 29.3%, <i>P</i> = .708) or reintervention (4.3 vs 5.6%, <i>P</i> = .999) between groups. Radiographic changes occurred in 28.6% of ppCXR, but these findings display poor sensitivity (65.0%) and specificity (73.4%) for reintervention. Delayed ppCXR had more ICU transfers (0 vs 5.6%, <i>P</i> = .046), but no differences in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or total CXRs.DiscussionThe timing of ppCXR did not affect detection of radiographic changes or reintervention rates. Our findings support growing evidence questioning routine ppCXR in asymptomatic trauma patients. Future multicenter studies are warranted to establish standardized protocols and reduce unnecessary imaging in trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"429-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diversity and Expertise Among Authors of U.S. Surgical Society Clinical Guidelines. 美国外科学会临床指南作者的多样性和专业知识。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251367049
Alexander Berg, Kaustav Chattopadhyay, Youvin Chung, Kayen Tang, Nam Yong Cho, Lakshika Tennakoon, David A Spain, Jeff Choi

BackgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) shape surgical care and outcomes, but concerns persist regarding the diversity and expertise of their authors. Whether U.S. surgical society guidelines reflect inclusive and expert-driven authorship remains unknown.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 213 CPGs published by 11 national U.S. surgical societies between 2015 and 2024. We assessed author gender, race/ethnicity, and prior publication history using validated name-based algorithms and PubMed queries. Authors were classified as underrepresented in medicine (URiM) if identified as Black and Hispanic/Latino. Trends over time were analyzed using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test.ResultsAmong 2185 authors, 557 (25.5%) were women and 111 (5.1%) were URiM. Over half of guidelines (52.1%) had no URiM authors, and 21.6% had no female authors. Female representation increased over time (P = 0.02), while URiM representation remained unchanged (P = 0.32). Representation varied widely across societies. Among first and corresponding authors, 45% had fewer than 5 topic-specific publications. Additionally, 486 (14.7%) of all authors had no prior guideline authorship experience.DiscussionCPGs published by U.S. surgical societies from 2015 to 2024 demonstrated persistent gaps in gender and racial/ethnic diversity, as well as inconsistent subject-matter expertise among authors. These findings raise concerns about the representativeness and rigor of current guideline development practices. Surgical societies should consider reforms to authorship selection processes to promote more inclusive and expert-driven guidance reflective of the populations they serve.

临床实践指南(cpg)影响手术护理和结果,但对其作者的多样性和专业知识的关注仍然存在。美国外科学会指南是否反映了包容性和专家驱动的作者仍然未知。方法对2015年至2024年美国11个国家外科学会发表的213份cpg进行了横断面分析。我们使用经过验证的基于姓名的算法和PubMed查询来评估作者的性别、种族/民族和先前的出版历史。如果确定作者为黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔,则将其归类为医学代表性不足(URiM)。使用Jonckheere-Terpstra测试分析随时间变化的趋势。结果2185名作者中,女性557人(25.5%),女性111人(5.1%)。超过一半(52.1%)的指南没有URiM作者,21.6%的指南没有女性作者。女性代表人数随着时间的推移而增加(P = 0.02),而男性代表人数保持不变(P = 0.32)。不同社会的代表性差异很大。在第一作者和通讯作者中,45%的人发表的特定主题论文少于5篇。此外,486位(14.7%)作者之前没有撰写指南的经验。美国外科学会从2015年到2024年出版的cpg显示出性别和种族/民族多样性的持续差距,以及作者之间主题专业知识的不一致。这些发现引起了对当前指南制定实践的代表性和严谨性的关注。外科学会应考虑对作者选择过程进行改革,以促进更具包容性和专家驱动的指导,反映他们所服务的人群。
{"title":"Diversity and Expertise Among Authors of U.S. Surgical Society Clinical Guidelines.","authors":"Alexander Berg, Kaustav Chattopadhyay, Youvin Chung, Kayen Tang, Nam Yong Cho, Lakshika Tennakoon, David A Spain, Jeff Choi","doi":"10.1177/00031348251367049","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251367049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) shape surgical care and outcomes, but concerns persist regarding the diversity and expertise of their authors. Whether U.S. surgical society guidelines reflect inclusive and expert-driven authorship remains unknown.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 213 CPGs published by 11 national U.S. surgical societies between 2015 and 2024. We assessed author gender, race/ethnicity, and prior publication history using validated name-based algorithms and PubMed queries. Authors were classified as underrepresented in medicine (URiM) if identified as Black and Hispanic/Latino. Trends over time were analyzed using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test.ResultsAmong 2185 authors, 557 (25.5%) were women and 111 (5.1%) were URiM. Over half of guidelines (52.1%) had no URiM authors, and 21.6% had no female authors. Female representation increased over time (<i>P</i> = 0.02), while URiM representation remained unchanged (<i>P</i> = 0.32). Representation varied widely across societies. Among first and corresponding authors, 45% had fewer than 5 topic-specific publications. Additionally, 486 (14.7%) of all authors had no prior guideline authorship experience.DiscussionCPGs published by U.S. surgical societies from 2015 to 2024 demonstrated persistent gaps in gender and racial/ethnic diversity, as well as inconsistent subject-matter expertise among authors. These findings raise concerns about the representativeness and rigor of current guideline development practices. Surgical societies should consider reforms to authorship selection processes to promote more inclusive and expert-driven guidance reflective of the populations they serve.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"369-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144788077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complementary Computed Tomography to Inconclusive Ultrasonography in Children with Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 疑似急性阑尾炎儿童的辅助计算机断层扫描与不确定的超声检查:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251371186
Vinícius Diniz Cedro Araújo, Bianca Cardoso Lopes, Andy Petroianu, Iure Kalinine Ferraz Souza

IntroductionThe optimal diagnostic pathway for pediatric acute appendicitis (AA) following an inconclusive or negative ultrasonography (US) is poorly defined, leading to debate over subsequent computed tomography (CT) use. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared negative appendectomy rates in children managed with a US-only pathway vs a pathway involving CT after a non-diagnostic initial US.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024568560), we systematically searched 6 databases, including PubMed and Embase, through July 2024 for longitudinal studies comparing the 2 diagnostic pathways. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsThe pooled analysis demonstrated that a US-only pathway was associated with significantly lower odds of negative appendectomy compared to the US-followed-by-CT pathway (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.90; P = 0.02). This protective association was even more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with an initial inconclusive US (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.89; P = 0.03).ConclusionIn children with suspected AA after a non-diagnostic US, a US-only pathway is associated with a significantly lower rate of negative appendectomy. These findings support strategies that prioritize clinical re-evaluation and repeat US to reduce unnecessary surgeries and radiation exposure. However, given the low certainty of evidence, clinical judgment remains paramount.

儿童急性阑尾炎(AA)在超声检查不确定或阴性(US)后的最佳诊断途径尚不明确,导致后续计算机断层扫描(CT)使用的争论。本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了在非诊断性初始超声检查后仅行超声检查的儿童阑尾切除术阴性率与行CT检查的儿童阑尾切除术阴性率。方法遵循PRISMA指南(PROSPERO: CRD42024568560),到2024年7月,我们系统地检索了包括PubMed和Embase在内的6个数据库,比较两种诊断途径的纵向研究。两位审稿人独立选择研究并提取数据。纳入研究的偏倚风险采用ROBINS-I和Newcastle-Ottawa量表进行评估,证据的确定性采用GRADE框架进行评估。采用固定效应荟萃分析计算95%置信区间(ci)的合并优势比(ORs)。结果合并分析显示,与us -随访- ct途径相比,单纯us途径与阑尾切除术阴性的几率显著降低(OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.90; P = 0.02)。这种保护性关联在初始US不确定的患者亚组中更为明显(OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.89; P = 0.03)。结论:在非诊断性US后疑似AA的儿童中,仅US通路与阑尾切除术阴性率显著降低相关。这些发现支持优先考虑临床重新评估和重复US以减少不必要的手术和辐射暴露的策略。然而,鉴于证据的低确定性,临床判断仍然是最重要的。
{"title":"Complementary Computed Tomography to Inconclusive Ultrasonography in Children with Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Vinícius Diniz Cedro Araújo, Bianca Cardoso Lopes, Andy Petroianu, Iure Kalinine Ferraz Souza","doi":"10.1177/00031348251371186","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251371186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe optimal diagnostic pathway for pediatric acute appendicitis (AA) following an inconclusive or negative ultrasonography (US) is poorly defined, leading to debate over subsequent computed tomography (CT) use. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared negative appendectomy rates in children managed with a US-only pathway vs a pathway involving CT after a non-diagnostic initial US.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024568560), we systematically searched 6 databases, including PubMed and Embase, through July 2024 for longitudinal studies comparing the 2 diagnostic pathways. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsThe pooled analysis demonstrated that a US-only pathway was associated with significantly lower odds of negative appendectomy compared to the US-followed-by-CT pathway (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.90; <i>P</i> = 0.02). This protective association was even more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with an initial inconclusive US (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.89; <i>P</i> = 0.03).ConclusionIn children with suspected AA after a non-diagnostic US, a US-only pathway is associated with a significantly lower rate of negative appendectomy. These findings support strategies that prioritize clinical re-evaluation and repeat US to reduce unnecessary surgeries and radiation exposure. However, given the low certainty of evidence, clinical judgment remains paramount.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"576-589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145032513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Automated 3D Computed Tomography Bronchography and Angiography as a Useful Tool for the Clinical Medicine Education of Lung Segmentectomy. 自动三维计算机断层支气管造影和血管造影在肺段切除术临床医学教育中的应用。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-03 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251363512
Yuan Zhao, Fei Yuan, Wen Liu, Jianhui Zuo, Renquan Zhang

ObjectiveAs pulmonary segmentectomy becomes increasingly common in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer, providing relevant clinical training for residents is essential. However, understanding pulmonary segment anatomy can be challenging due to its complex and variable structures. This study aimed to evaluate the value of automated three-dimensional CT bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) technology in training surgical residents for segmentectomy.MethodsFifty-two surgical residents were randomized into 2 groups: the 3D-CTBA group and the control group. The 3D-CTBA group utilized automated 3D-CTBA technology alongside specific case for segmentectomy training, while the control group relied on traditional teaching methods. After the training sessions, all participants completed a post-training assessment and questionnaires. Additionally, we collected feedback from instructors regarding the residents' performance through a separate questionnaire.ResultsResidents in the 3D-CTBA group achieved significantly higher scores on the post-training assessments than those in the control group (83.46 ± 6.75 vs 68.27 ± 8.12, P < 0.001). Subjective survey results indicated that automated 3D-CTBA technology greatly benefited residents in preoperatively identifying tumor locations, recognizing anatomical variations during surgery, and mastering relevant surgical techniques. Feedback from instructors indicated that residents in the 3D-CTBA group performed better intraoperatively than those in the control group. Furthermore, residents in the 3D-CTBA group expressed greater interest in learning and higher satisfaction with the course.ConclusionsAutomated 3D-CTBA technology significantly improved residents' comprehension of the complex and variable anatomy of pulmonary segments, thereby enhancing their related surgical skills.

目的随着肺段切除术在早期肺癌治疗中的应用越来越普遍,为住院医师提供相关的临床培训是必不可少的。然而,由于肺段结构复杂多变,理解其解剖结构具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估自动三维CT支气管造影和血管造影(3D-CTBA)技术在培训外科住院医师进行节段切除术中的价值。方法将52例住院医师随机分为两组:3D-CTBA组和对照组。3D-CTBA组采用3D-CTBA自动化技术结合具体病例进行节段切除培训,对照组采用传统教学方法。培训结束后,所有参与者完成了培训后评估和问卷调查。此外,我们通过一份单独的问卷收集了教师对住院医生表现的反馈。结果3D-CTBA组住院医师训练后评估得分显著高于对照组(83.46±6.75 vs 68.27±8.12,P < 0.001)。主观调查结果显示,3D-CTBA自动化技术在术前识别肿瘤位置、术中识别解剖变异、掌握相关手术技术等方面对住院医师有很大帮助。指导员的反馈表明,3D-CTBA组住院医师术中表现优于对照组。此外,3D-CTBA组的住院医师表现出更大的学习兴趣和更高的课程满意度。结论自动化3D-CTBA技术显著提高住院医师对肺段复杂多变解剖结构的理解,从而提高其相关手术技能。
{"title":"Automated 3D Computed Tomography Bronchography and Angiography as a Useful Tool for the Clinical Medicine Education of Lung Segmentectomy.","authors":"Yuan Zhao, Fei Yuan, Wen Liu, Jianhui Zuo, Renquan Zhang","doi":"10.1177/00031348251363512","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251363512","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveAs pulmonary segmentectomy becomes increasingly common in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer, providing relevant clinical training for residents is essential. However, understanding pulmonary segment anatomy can be challenging due to its complex and variable structures. This study aimed to evaluate the value of automated three-dimensional CT bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) technology in training surgical residents for segmentectomy.MethodsFifty-two surgical residents were randomized into 2 groups: the 3D-CTBA group and the control group. The 3D-CTBA group utilized automated 3D-CTBA technology alongside specific case for segmentectomy training, while the control group relied on traditional teaching methods. After the training sessions, all participants completed a post-training assessment and questionnaires. Additionally, we collected feedback from instructors regarding the residents' performance through a separate questionnaire.ResultsResidents in the 3D-CTBA group achieved significantly higher scores on the post-training assessments than those in the control group (83.46 ± 6.75 vs 68.27 ± 8.12, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Subjective survey results indicated that automated 3D-CTBA technology greatly benefited residents in preoperatively identifying tumor locations, recognizing anatomical variations during surgery, and mastering relevant surgical techniques. Feedback from instructors indicated that residents in the 3D-CTBA group performed better intraoperatively than those in the control group. Furthermore, residents in the 3D-CTBA group expressed greater interest in learning and higher satisfaction with the course.ConclusionsAutomated 3D-CTBA technology significantly improved residents' comprehension of the complex and variable anatomy of pulmonary segments, thereby enhancing their related surgical skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"360-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144774529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Stratification of Smokers Undergoing Colorectal Surgery. 结直肠手术吸烟者的风险分层。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251371209
Fatima Choudhary, Amrita Ladwa, Marietta Kocher, Sofia Lopez, Charles Friel, Traci Hedrick, Sook Hoang

BackgroundSmoking is an established risk factor for postoperative complications. There is limited data on characteristics of smokers that increase risk beyond pack-years. This study aims to assess the effect of preoperative smoking duration and intensity, periods of cessation, and concurrent smokeless product use on colorectal surgery outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess operative details, demographic and smoking factors, and postoperative complications in smokers. The cohort included 239 current and former smokers who underwent colorectal surgery from 2012 to 2022. The primary endpoint was major adverse events 30-days postoperatively, defined as incidence of major bleeding, venous-thromboembolism, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, acute respiratory distress syndrome, stroke, infection, mortality, or readmission.ResultsThe most common procedure was colon resection. Average age at procedure was 63.9 ± 0.85 years, smoking duration was 27.0 ± 1.0 years, packs-per-day was 0.94 ± 0.04 packs, and pack-years was 26.0 ± 1.7. It was found that 11% of the patients concurrently used smokeless products (chew, dip, and/or vape). Half of the patients quit smoking prior to surgery. During the follow-up period, 28% had any major adverse event. Independent predictors of increased complications were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .01), pack-years (P = .02), and concurrent vape use (P = .01). Years of smoking (P = .01) was an independent predictor of complications, whereas packs-per-day (P = .33) was not. Former smokers (P = .03) had fewer complications than current smokers.DiscussionColorectal surgery patients with significant duration of smoking and/or concurrent vape use should be counseled regarding their increased risk of major postoperative complications.

吸烟是术后并发症的一个确定的危险因素。关于吸烟者在超过包年之后增加风险的特征的数据有限。本研究旨在评估术前吸烟持续时间和强度、戒烟时间以及同时使用无烟产品对结直肠手术结果的影响。方法采用回顾性队列研究,对吸烟者的手术细节、人口学、吸烟因素及术后并发症进行评估。该队列包括239名在2012年至2022年间接受结直肠手术的吸烟者。主要终点是术后30天的主要不良事件,定义为大出血、静脉血栓栓塞、急性肾损伤、心肌梗死、急性呼吸窘迫综合征、中风、感染、死亡率或再入院的发生率。结果结肠切除术是最常见的手术方式。手术时平均年龄63.9±0.85岁,吸烟时间27.0±1.0年,每日包数0.94±0.04包,包年26.0±1.7包。研究发现,11%的患者同时使用无烟产品(咀嚼、浸吸和/或vape)。一半的病人在手术前戒烟。在随访期间,28%的患者出现了重大不良事件。并发症增加的独立预测因子是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(P = 0.01)、包年(P = 0.02)和同时使用电子烟(P = 0.01)。吸烟年数(P = 0.01)是并发症的独立预测因子,而每日吸烟包数(P = 0.33)则不是。既往吸烟者(P = .03)并发症发生率低于当前吸烟者。对于长期吸烟和/或同时使用电子烟的结直肠手术患者,应告知其术后主要并发症的风险增加。
{"title":"Risk Stratification of Smokers Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.","authors":"Fatima Choudhary, Amrita Ladwa, Marietta Kocher, Sofia Lopez, Charles Friel, Traci Hedrick, Sook Hoang","doi":"10.1177/00031348251371209","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251371209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSmoking is an established risk factor for postoperative complications. There is limited data on characteristics of smokers that increase risk beyond pack-years. This study aims to assess the effect of preoperative smoking duration and intensity, periods of cessation, and concurrent smokeless product use on colorectal surgery outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess operative details, demographic and smoking factors, and postoperative complications in smokers. The cohort included 239 current and former smokers who underwent colorectal surgery from 2012 to 2022. The primary endpoint was major adverse events 30-days postoperatively, defined as incidence of major bleeding, venous-thromboembolism, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, acute respiratory distress syndrome, stroke, infection, mortality, or readmission.ResultsThe most common procedure was colon resection. Average age at procedure was 63.9 ± 0.85 years, smoking duration was 27.0 ± 1.0 years, packs-per-day was 0.94 ± 0.04 packs, and pack-years was 26.0 ± 1.7. It was found that 11% of the patients concurrently used smokeless products (chew, dip, and/or vape). Half of the patients quit smoking prior to surgery. During the follow-up period, 28% had any major adverse event. Independent predictors of increased complications were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (<i>P</i> = .01), pack-years (<i>P</i> = .02), and concurrent vape use (<i>P</i> = .01). Years of smoking (<i>P</i> = .01) was an independent predictor of complications, whereas packs-per-day (<i>P</i> = .33) was not. Former smokers (<i>P</i> = .03) had fewer complications than current smokers.DiscussionColorectal surgery patients with significant duration of smoking and/or concurrent vape use should be counseled regarding their increased risk of major postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"414-420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Does Not Improve Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Resection for Upper Rectal Cancer: A US Rectal Cancer Consortium Analysis. 美国直肠癌协会分析:新辅助放化疗不能改善上直肠癌切除术患者的预后。
IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1177/00031348251371207
Caroline R Goel, Christina M Gozza, Adriana C Gamboa, Emilie K Warren, Scott E Regenbogen, Samantha Hendren, Jennifer Holder-Murray, Matthew Kalady, Aslam Ejaz, Alexander T Hawkins, Matthew L Silviera, Shishir K Maithel, Glen C Balch, Seth A Rosen

Background: The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) for upper rectal cancer remains controversial. Our aim was to determine whether NCRT was associated with improved outcomes. Methods: The US Rectal Cancer Consortium was queried for patients who underwent resection of nonmetastatic upper rectal cancer (≥12 cm from anal verge) from 2007-2017. Primary outcomes were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. Results: 193 pts met inclusion criteria; 100 (52%) did not receive NCRT and 93 (48%) did. Patients in each group had similar age, gender, and pathological stage (non-NCRT: 22% stage I, 32% stage II, 36% stage III; NCRT: 21% stage I, 23% stage II, 33% stage III; P = 0.143). Median follow-up was 31 months (non-NCRT) and 34 months (NCRT). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, NCRT was not associated with improved RFS compared to non-NCRT (3-year RFS 85% vs 80%; P = 0.34) or OS (3-year OS 88% vs 90%; P = 0.49). This finding persisted on multivariable cox regression. R0 resection rate was similar between groups at 99% (non-NCRT) and 97% (NCRT; P = 0.27). Anastomotic leak occurred in 11% of both cohorts. Creation of a diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) was nearly 3 times higher in NCRT (82%) vs non-NCRT patients (29%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients with nonmetastatic upper rectal cancer, NCRT did not improve survival or recurrence rates, but was associated with a nearly 3-fold higher DLI rate. Although NCRT is a mainstay of treatment for lower rectal cancer, our results do not support its use in upper rectal cancer.

背景:上直肠癌的新辅助放化疗(NCRT)的使用仍然存在争议。我们的目的是确定NCRT是否与改善预后有关。方法:对2007-2017年接受非转移性上直肠癌(距肛缘≥12 cm)切除术的患者进行美国直肠癌协会的查询。主要结局为无复发(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要结局为术后并发症。结果:193例患者符合纳入标准;未接受NCRT者100例(52%),接受NCRT者93例(48%)。各组患者年龄、性别、病理分期相似(non-NCRT: 22% I期,32% II期,36% III期;NCRT: 21% I期,23% II期,33% III期,P = 0.143)。中位随访时间为31个月(非NCRT)和34个月(NCRT)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与非NCRT(3年RFS 85% vs 80%, P = 0.34)或OS(3年OS 88% vs 90%, P = 0.49)相比,NCRT与改善的RFS无关。这一发现在多变量cox回归中仍然存在。R0切除率在99%(非NCRT)和97% (NCRT; P = 0.27)组间相似。两组患者吻合口漏发生率均为11%。NCRT患者(82%)比非NCRT患者(29%,P < 0.001)创建转流袢回肠造口(DLI)几乎高出3倍。结论:在非转移性上直肠癌患者中,NCRT并没有提高生存率或复发率,但与DLI率升高近3倍相关。虽然NCRT是下段直肠癌的主要治疗方法,但我们的研究结果并不支持其在上段直肠癌中的应用。
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Does Not Improve Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Resection for Upper Rectal Cancer: A US Rectal Cancer Consortium Analysis.","authors":"Caroline R Goel, Christina M Gozza, Adriana C Gamboa, Emilie K Warren, Scott E Regenbogen, Samantha Hendren, Jennifer Holder-Murray, Matthew Kalady, Aslam Ejaz, Alexander T Hawkins, Matthew L Silviera, Shishir K Maithel, Glen C Balch, Seth A Rosen","doi":"10.1177/00031348251371207","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251371207","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) for upper rectal cancer remains controversial. Our aim was to determine whether NCRT was associated with improved outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> The US Rectal Cancer Consortium was queried for patients who underwent resection of nonmetastatic upper rectal cancer (≥12 cm from anal verge) from 2007-2017. Primary outcomes were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. <b>Results:</b> 193 pts met inclusion criteria; 100 (52%) did not receive NCRT and 93 (48%) did. Patients in each group had similar age, gender, and pathological stage (non-NCRT: 22% stage I, 32% stage II, 36% stage III; NCRT: 21% stage I, 23% stage II, 33% stage III; <i>P</i> = 0.143). Median follow-up was 31 months (non-NCRT) and 34 months (NCRT). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, NCRT was not associated with improved RFS compared to non-NCRT (3-year RFS 85% vs 80%; <i>P</i> = 0.34) or OS (3-year OS 88% vs 90%; <i>P</i> = 0.49). This finding persisted on multivariable cox regression. R0 resection rate was similar between groups at 99% (non-NCRT) and 97% (NCRT; <i>P</i> = 0.27). Anastomotic leak occurred in 11% of both cohorts. Creation of a diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) was nearly 3 times higher in NCRT (82%) vs non-NCRT patients (29%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Among patients with nonmetastatic upper rectal cancer, NCRT did not improve survival or recurrence rates, but was associated with a nearly 3-fold higher DLI rate. Although NCRT is a mainstay of treatment for lower rectal cancer, our results do not support its use in upper rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"457-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Surgeon
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1