American Surgeon最新文献

Background: Over the past several years, the liver transplant community has embraced the concept of fast-tracking patients to facilitate earlier postoperative recovery.

Aim: Derive and validate a novel "fast-track" risk score that captures the demographic and clinical characteristics of DDLT patients to predict the likelihood of early extubation after surgery.

Design: Adult patients who underwent non-fulminant DDLT between January 2014 and July 2019 were included. The cohort was divided in 2 groups: patients extubated within 4 hours of surgery vs extubated after 4 h. Logistic regression was performed to identify the independent predictors of early extubation. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to measure the ability of the risk score to predict early extubation. The score was validated by applying coefficients of the regression model to the validation cohort and calculating the AUC.

Results: A total of 290 DDLT patients were included, of which 175 (60%) were in the "delayed extubation" group and 115 (40%) were in the "fast-track" group. Patients with a MELD <29, transfused <4 units of pRBCs, and transfused <5 units of FFP during surgery were 2.30 times, 5.74 times, and 3.09 times more likely to be extubated early, respectively. A risk score with an integer point scale was derived and exhibited an AUC of .80. The proportion of patients who were extubated early increased from 2.78% at a score of 0 to 66.67% at a score of 4.

Conclusions: The proposed score provides a fast and easy method to help identify DDLT patients suitable for early extubation.

Background: Level 1 Trauma Centers alert hospital staff in advance of a trauma patient's arrival to allow time for trauma team assembly and preparedness. Excess staff wait times may result in reduced trauma center productivity and efficiency. The objective of this study was to explore the wait time expended by various hospital staff in anticipation of trauma patient arrivals and calculate cost and adequacy of preparation time.

Methods: This prospective observational study recorded a sample of wait times for trauma team staff members at an urban Level 1 Trauma Center for 12 months. We observed 288 trauma activations in total. We constructed a dataset of notification alerts, patient arrival times, staff arrival, and wait times, along with a qualitative staff assessment of time to prepare for the trauma patient's arrival. We applied detailed salary data to quantify the financial cost of Trauma Center staff wait time.

Results: When staff waited for a trauma patient's arrival, average wait times ranged from 4.27 to 10.67 minutes. This cost $139 791.65 during calendar year 2023 at our hospital. Staff had enough time to arrive at trauma incidents 99.1% of the time. In 4.2% of cases (n = 12), staff had no advance notification of an incoming trauma patient.

Discussion: We find that a longer duration between the issuance of alerts and the actual arrival of trauma patients represents a direct financial cost attributable to lost productivity in addition to indirect and cascading effects on operational efficiency and patient care.

This piece explores a personal path to becoming a surgeon, driven by a moment of helplessness at a beloved family member's bedside. Unable to alleviate their suffering, the sense of inadequacy and helplessness fueled a determination to pursue surgery, particularly trauma surgery. Through rigorous training, purpose was found in the ability to act decisively and compassionately in moments of crisis. This journey, shaped by personal loss, reflects how vulnerability can transform into a deep commitment to healing and service of those in need.

Background: The precautions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic led to the growing practice of bundling lines in patients requiring intubation. Our study aims to examine the effect of immediate bundled lines (IBL) on traumatic injuries. We hypothesized that severely injured patients may benefit from IBL.

Methods: A retrospective review of all intubated trauma patients (1/2015-12/2020) at a Level I Trauma Center was conducted. Patients ≤18 years and those who died or were transferred prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission were excluded. IBL was defined as placement of central venous catheter (CVC) and arterial line (AL) ≤4 hours after intubation. Delayed lines were any lines placed >4 hours after intubation. Primary outcome was time from intubation to CVC and AL.

Results: 728 patients were included. The majority received CVC and/or AL with 17.7% in a delayed fashion. Severe head injury (AIS ≥3) most often had immediate AL or delayed bundled lines (P < 0.001). IBL were more common with gunshot wounds (GSW) (P < 0.001) and blood transfusions (P < 0.001). IBL were associated with significantly lower GCS (P = 0.018) and higher median ISS. Multivariate logistic regression revealed severe/profound ISS, GSW, and pedestrian struck were predictive of IBL.

Discussion: Intubated trauma patients who presented with certain mechanisms (GSW, pedestrian struck), received blood transfusions, or exhibited severe/profound ISS may be more likely to receive IBL. IBL is not superior to either immediate AL or to no lines in terms of mortality. No lines had a significant effect on ICU LOS or hospital LOS, except in the setting of severe head injury.

Purpose: Concerns exist regarding increased trauma activation fees at the expense of vulnerable patients. In contrast, elective open inguinal hernia repair (E-OIHR) has remained relatively fixed in terms of technique. This study aimed to examine health care costs for E-OIHR and trauma patients, hypothesizing trauma cost would increase from 2010 to 2018, while E-OIHR cost would remain unchanged. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried (2010-2018) for admitted patients undergoing unilateral E-OIHR or trauma-related admission. Health care costs per admission, total annual costs, and trends of E-OIHR and trauma admissions were also examined. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association of individual- and hospital-level variables with total costs. Results: Unilateral E-OIHR admission cost more than doubled per case in 2018. Trauma cost per admission also increased, however, only by 34%. Total costs for all E-OIHR admissions increased 26%, whereas trauma admission costs increased 32%. Both trauma admissions and unilateral E-OIHR admissions decreased; however, E-OIHR admissions decreased more. Multiple linear regression demonstrated compared to the cost of E-OIHR, trauma care decreased when adjusting for year, age, severity, hospital type, and length of stay (P < .001). Conclusion: The rate of increase in cost per unilateral E-OIHR admission exceeded that of trauma. However, the total economic burden for trauma care increased by billions of dollars due to a steady increase in per incidence cost and only slightly lower rates of trauma admissions. Increased focus on high-value care to curtail increasing costs of E-OIHR and especially trauma appears warranted.

The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the axilla in breast cancer patients has changed significantly over the past 30 years, with the replacement of complete axillary lymph node dissection practices by less invasive approaches. Reference is made to clinical findings that have led to practical treatment recommendations and are paving the way to new levels of de-escalation in breast cancer surgery.

Introduction: American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) defines minimum Standard Criteria (SC) for Level 1 trauma. In our hospital, discretion of prehospital personnel ("Paramedic Judgment" [PJ]) can initiate Full Trauma Triage Activation (FTTA) in the absence of ACS-COT criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate overtriage and undertriage for PJ vs SC.

Methods: 1846 patients met criteria from 1/1/19 to 1/5/23. This study utilized the Cribari Matrix to define under, over, and appropriate triage, and utilizes Chi-Squared Test to determine significance. We performed an adjusted binomial logistic regression comparing overtriage and undertriage for PJ vs SC. We analyzed the Need for Emergent Intervention-6 (NEI-6) model to see if it could be a way to accurately assess triage.

Results: Overtriage for the PJ group was 68.9%, compared to 54.8% for SC, with a P-value ≤.05, and undertriage for the PJ group was 1.23% compared to 0.13%. After adjusting for confounders, the risk of overtriage by the PJ group was 2.04 times as likely compared to the SC group (OR 2.04; P < .01). The OR for undertriage was not calculated due to lack of power. The odds of needing a blood transfusion for the PJ patients compared to the SC patients is approximately one-third (OR 0.33; P < .01). The other variables were lacking in power.

Conclusion: The aim of this study is to evaluate over and undertriage for PJ and SC at our large urban center. We found that overtriage was 2 times as likely when using PJ compared with the SC.

Physicians face constant pressures to learn and adapt to new knowledge, techniques, and technology. Mental practice-the process of rehearsing a task without the physical action of performing it-is a cognitive tool that is used by many professions to hone abilities and prepare for difficult undertakings. Mental practice can help optimize physician performance but there is minimal research on its application in practice. In this systematic review we assessed the usefulness of mental practice for surgeons to aid in skill acquisition. Using PRISMA guidelines, 12 studies were selected for evaluation. The results of these studies show clear advantages to using mental practice to improve overall surgical performance. Here, we discuss mental practice, the evidence for its use, and how it can be learned and performed.

Aims: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the safety and effectiveness of beta antagonists for improving clinical care in burn patients, compared to placebo.

Methods: Articles from randomized-controlled trials were identified by a literature search on PubMed and Cochrane. We included relevant trials involving patients with burn. Trials were eligible if they evaluated propranolol and compared to usual care or placebo. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 2114 patients were included from 14 RCTs. Beta-blocker-treated patients had decreased heart rates (WMD = -14.73, 95% CIs = [-19.14, -10.32]), mean arterial pressure (WMD = -2.76, 95% CIs = [-3.81, -1.70]), rate pressure product (WMD = -1.13, 95% CIs = [-1.56, -0.71]), reduced time for wound healing (WMD = -5.08, 95% CIs [-8.97, -1.18]), and lower resting energy expenditure (WMD = -168.83, 95% CIs [-232.03, -105.63]). However, use of beta-blockers did not reduce mortality rate (WMD = 0.98, 95% CIs [0.68, 1.41]), incidence of sepsis (RR = 0.82, 95% CIs = [0.50, 1.35]), or length of stay in hospital (WMD = -1.50, 95% CIs [-4.76, 1.77]) compared with placebo.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the administration of propranolol to burned patients does not contribute to increased mortality rates, reduced length of hospital stays, or heightened sepsis occurrence. It demonstrates a protective effect on heart function by reducing heart rate, resting energy expenditure, rate pressure product, and wound healing. More randomized-controlled and multi-center studies are needed to effectively establish the use of beta antagonists in burn patients.