Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1177/00031348261421661
Mary Matecki, Maximilian P Forssten, Yang Cao, Babak Sarani, Shahin Mohseni
BackgroundMost studies demonstrating efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) are in patients with isolated severe chest wall injury. Recent evidence suggests SSRF may reduce mortality in polytrauma patients. The present study examines SSRF outcomes in severe polytrauma patients.MethodsThe 2013-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Project database was used to identify severe polytrauma patients, defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥15 and abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥2 in 2 or more regions, with rib fractures. Exclusion criteria included AIS 6 in any region, death ≤72 hours, or SSRF >72 hours after admission. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and length of mechanical ventilation. Adjustment for confounding was achieved using inverse probability of treatment weighting, Poisson regression models and quantile regression models.ResultsA total of 388 091 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 1.3% (N = 5020) underwent SSRF. SSRF was associated with a 57% decreased risk of mortality (P < 0.001) and 53% lower risk of ARDS (P < 0.001). Patients who underwent SSRF also required approximately 1 day less of mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001). Patients with ISS 15-19 exhibited an association between SSRF and a 55% (P = 0.023) lower rate of pneumonia.ConclusionSSRF within 72 hours of admission in severe polytrauma patients is associated with a lower rate of mortality and acute respiratory distress syndrome, along with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. A reduction in the rate of pneumonia was only observed among patients with ISS 15-19.
{"title":"Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in Severe Polytrauma: A Potential Indication.","authors":"Mary Matecki, Maximilian P Forssten, Yang Cao, Babak Sarani, Shahin Mohseni","doi":"10.1177/00031348261421661","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261421661","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMost studies demonstrating efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) are in patients with isolated severe chest wall injury. Recent evidence suggests SSRF may reduce mortality in polytrauma patients. The present study examines SSRF outcomes in severe polytrauma patients.MethodsThe 2013-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Project database was used to identify severe polytrauma patients, defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥15 and abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥2 in 2 or more regions, with rib fractures. Exclusion criteria included AIS 6 in any region, death ≤72 hours, or SSRF >72 hours after admission. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and length of mechanical ventilation. Adjustment for confounding was achieved using inverse probability of treatment weighting, Poisson regression models and quantile regression models.ResultsA total of 388 091 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 1.3% (N = 5020) underwent SSRF. SSRF was associated with a 57% decreased risk of mortality (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and 53% lower risk of ARDS (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients who underwent SSRF also required approximately 1 day less of mechanical ventilation (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients with ISS 15-19 exhibited an association between SSRF and a 55% (<i>P</i> = 0.023) lower rate of pneumonia.ConclusionSSRF within 72 hours of admission in severe polytrauma patients is associated with a lower rate of mortality and acute respiratory distress syndrome, along with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. A reduction in the rate of pneumonia was only observed among patients with ISS 15-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261421661"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146155843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1177/00031348261423922
Jeff Conner, Andrew M Nunn, Martin Avery, Carma Goldstein, Hannah Carroll, Mary Alyce McCullough, Nathan Mowery, Jason Hoth, Gregory R Stettler
BackgroundDefinitions of massive transfusion following injury help identify patients at the greatest risk of death. However, these definitions primarily use blood component therapy. The use of whole blood (WB) transfusion protocols has seen a resurgence, with evidence of improved outcomes compared to component therapy. Therefore, our aim was to define and stratify patients into low, intermediate, and high risk for death based on volume of blood products transfused utilizing a WB-first resuscitation strategy.MethodsPatients that received at least 1 unit of whole blood following injury between January 2016 and November 2021 were identified. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to predict death based on volume of blood products transfused were constructed. Patients were stratified to low, intermediate, and high risk of death based on positive likelihood ratios.ResultsThere were 785 patients identified to have received at least 1 unit of WB following injury during the study period. Based on ROC curve analysis, the best predictor of death was volume of whole blood plus packed red blood cells (PRBC) in the first hour (AUC 0.66, P < 0.001). Low risk of mortality was defined as WB + PRBC volume <3400 cc in the first hour (14.9% mortality), intermediate risk 3400-5100 cc in the first hour (39.1% mortality), and high risk >5100 mL in the first hour (66.7% mortality).DiscussionThe combination of WB + PRBC volume within the first hour following injury is the best predictor of death. Further, volumes of WB + PRBC transfused within the first hour can be used to stratify patients' risk of death.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.Study TypePrognostic and Epidemiological.
{"title":"Stratifying Early Risk of Death From Hemorrhage in the Era of Whole Blood.","authors":"Jeff Conner, Andrew M Nunn, Martin Avery, Carma Goldstein, Hannah Carroll, Mary Alyce McCullough, Nathan Mowery, Jason Hoth, Gregory R Stettler","doi":"10.1177/00031348261423922","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261423922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDefinitions of massive transfusion following injury help identify patients at the greatest risk of death. However, these definitions primarily use blood component therapy. The use of whole blood (WB) transfusion protocols has seen a resurgence, with evidence of improved outcomes compared to component therapy. Therefore, our aim was to define and stratify patients into low, intermediate, and high risk for death based on volume of blood products transfused utilizing a WB-first resuscitation strategy.MethodsPatients that received at least 1 unit of whole blood following injury between January 2016 and November 2021 were identified. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to predict death based on volume of blood products transfused were constructed. Patients were stratified to low, intermediate, and high risk of death based on positive likelihood ratios.ResultsThere were 785 patients identified to have received at least 1 unit of WB following injury during the study period. Based on ROC curve analysis, the best predictor of death was volume of whole blood plus packed red blood cells (PRBC) in the first hour (AUC 0.66, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Low risk of mortality was defined as WB + PRBC volume <3400 cc in the first hour (14.9% mortality), intermediate risk 3400-5100 cc in the first hour (39.1% mortality), and high risk >5100 mL in the first hour (66.7% mortality).DiscussionThe combination of WB + PRBC volume within the first hour following injury is the best predictor of death. Further, volumes of WB + PRBC transfused within the first hour can be used to stratify patients' risk of death.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.Study TypePrognostic and Epidemiological.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261423922"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146155836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1177/00031348261424392
Rebecca E Glavin, Brian P Scannell, Benjamin P Shore, Peter M Waters
IntroductionPersonality assessments have been widely used in business to identify leadership potential and enhance team performance; however, their integration into surgical education remains limited. This study evaluated surgeons' personality profiles using the PRISM assessment and compared them with those of other health care professionals to guide the design of leadership development curricula for surgical training.MethodsA total of 199 surgeons (residents, fellows, and faculty) across multiple academic medical centers completed the PRISM personality assessment as part of structured leadership development programs. Data were compared with a normative cohort of 5887 health care professionals from the SurePeople database. Primary and under-pressure personality profiles were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, with significance set at P < .05.ResultsNo significant differences were found between surgeons and other health care professionals in primary personality distributions. Under-pressure profiles, however, revealed a greater proportion of surgeons classified as the Navigator type (22% vs 14%; P = .05), reflecting tendency towards higher decisiveness and structure in stressful conditions. Personality distributions were similar across residents, fellows, and attending surgeons.DiscussionAlthough surgeons' baseline personalities mirror those of other health care professionals, their stress-related behavioral tendencies demonstrate a unique shift toward structured, action-oriented responses. Incorporating personality assessments such as PRISM into leadership curricula may enhance self-awareness, emotional intelligence, and team performance.ConclusionIntegrating structured personality assessment into surgical leadership education provides valuable insight into behavioral responses under stress and supports the development of adaptive, emotionally intelligent leaders who foster effective and collaborative surgical teams.
{"title":"Personality Profiles and Under-Pressure Behavioral Patterns in Surgical Trainees and Faculty: Implications for Leadership Curriculum Design.","authors":"Rebecca E Glavin, Brian P Scannell, Benjamin P Shore, Peter M Waters","doi":"10.1177/00031348261424392","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261424392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPersonality assessments have been widely used in business to identify leadership potential and enhance team performance; however, their integration into surgical education remains limited. This study evaluated surgeons' personality profiles using the PRISM assessment and compared them with those of other health care professionals to guide the design of leadership development curricula for surgical training.MethodsA total of 199 surgeons (residents, fellows, and faculty) across multiple academic medical centers completed the PRISM personality assessment as part of structured leadership development programs. Data were compared with a normative cohort of 5887 health care professionals from the SurePeople database. Primary and under-pressure personality profiles were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, with significance set at <i>P</i> < .05.ResultsNo significant differences were found between surgeons and other health care professionals in primary personality distributions. Under-pressure profiles, however, revealed a greater proportion of surgeons classified as the <i>Navigator</i> type (22% vs 14%; <i>P</i> = .05), reflecting tendency towards higher decisiveness and structure in stressful conditions. Personality distributions were similar across residents, fellows, and attending surgeons.DiscussionAlthough surgeons' baseline personalities mirror those of other health care professionals, their stress-related behavioral tendencies demonstrate a unique shift toward structured, action-oriented responses. Incorporating personality assessments such as PRISM into leadership curricula may enhance self-awareness, emotional intelligence, and team performance.ConclusionIntegrating structured personality assessment into surgical leadership education provides valuable insight into behavioral responses under stress and supports the development of adaptive, emotionally intelligent leaders who foster effective and collaborative surgical teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261424392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146148697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1177/00031348261425179
Ergin Erginöz, Muratcan Fırat, Kevser Sak, Sefa Ergün, Kağan Zengin, Şebnem Batur, Nuray Kepil, Mehmet Sinan Çarkman
IntroductionThe prognostic significance of high-risk features (HRFs) in stage II colon cancer is established, but the cumulative impact of multiple HRFs and their relation to stage III disease remain unclear. This study evaluated whether patients with stage II colon adenocarcinomas with ≥3 HRFs demonstrate survival outcomes comparable to stage III disease.MethodsA retrospective analysis included 377 patients who underwent curative resection for colon adenocarcinoma between 2016 and 2022. Patients were classified as stage II <3 HRFs (n = 102), stage II ≥3 HRFs (n = 88), and stage III (n = 187). Clinicopathologic variables were compared, and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.ResultsPatients with stage II ≥3 HRFs demonstrated 5-year OS and DFS rates of 58.9% and 57.8%, significantly worse than stage II <3 HRFs (79.4% and 74.5%) and comparable to stage III (71.2% and 61.3%) (P = .037, P = .040). Subgroup analysis confirmed that stage II ≥3 HRFs had worse OS and DFS than <3 HRFs (P = .010, P = .017), but outcomes were comparable to stage III (P = .126, P = .600). On multivariate analysis, predictors of worse OS included age ≥65, stoma formation, <12 lymph nodes, and elevated CEA, while DFS was adversely influenced by age ≥65, stoma formation, tumor volume >30 cm3, <12 lymph nodes, elevated CEA, and stage III disease.ConclusionStage II colon cancers with ≥3 HRFs demonstrate survival outcomes comparable to stage III, emphasizing the cumulative prognostic impact of multiple risk factors. These findings reinforce adjuvant chemotherapy consideration and highlight the need for refined risk stratification.
高危特征(hrf)在II期结肠癌中的预后意义已经确立,但多个hrf的累积影响及其与III期疾病的关系尚不清楚。该研究评估了hrf≥3的II期结肠癌患者是否表现出与III期疾病相当的生存结果。方法回顾性分析2016年至2022年377例接受根治性结肠腺癌切除术的患者。患者分为II期(P = 0.037, P = 0.040)。亚组分析证实,II期≥3 HRFs的OS和DFS较P = 0.010 (P = 0.017)差,但结果与III期相当(P = 0.126, P = 0.600)。多因素分析显示,不良OS的预测因素包括年龄≥65岁、造口形成、30 cm3、
{"title":"Prognostic Significance of Multiple High-Risk Features in Stage II Colon Adenocarcinomas Compared With Stage III Disease.","authors":"Ergin Erginöz, Muratcan Fırat, Kevser Sak, Sefa Ergün, Kağan Zengin, Şebnem Batur, Nuray Kepil, Mehmet Sinan Çarkman","doi":"10.1177/00031348261425179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261425179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe prognostic significance of high-risk features (HRFs) in stage II colon cancer is established, but the cumulative impact of multiple HRFs and their relation to stage III disease remain unclear. This study evaluated whether patients with stage II colon adenocarcinomas with ≥3 HRFs demonstrate survival outcomes comparable to stage III disease.MethodsA retrospective analysis included 377 patients who underwent curative resection for colon adenocarcinoma between 2016 and 2022. Patients were classified as stage II <3 HRFs (n = 102), stage II ≥3 HRFs (n = 88), and stage III (n = 187). Clinicopathologic variables were compared, and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.ResultsPatients with stage II ≥3 HRFs demonstrated 5-year OS and DFS rates of 58.9% and 57.8%, significantly worse than stage II <3 HRFs (79.4% and 74.5%) and comparable to stage III (71.2% and 61.3%) (<i>P</i> = .037, <i>P</i> = .040). Subgroup analysis confirmed that stage II ≥3 HRFs had worse OS and DFS than <3 HRFs (<i>P</i> = .010, <i>P</i> = .017), but outcomes were comparable to stage III (<i>P</i> = .126, <i>P</i> = .600). On multivariate analysis, predictors of worse OS included age ≥65, stoma formation, <12 lymph nodes, and elevated CEA, while DFS was adversely influenced by age ≥65, stoma formation, tumor volume >30 cm<sup>3</sup>, <12 lymph nodes, elevated CEA, and stage III disease.ConclusionStage II colon cancers with ≥3 HRFs demonstrate survival outcomes comparable to stage III, emphasizing the cumulative prognostic impact of multiple risk factors. These findings reinforce adjuvant chemotherapy consideration and highlight the need for refined risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261425179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146148765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wound contraction is a pivotal component of the wound healing cascade, and contractions of moderate intensity and duration can exert a facilitative effect on the healing process to a certain extent. Accumulating evidence indicates that α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)-positive myofibroblasts act as the primary functional effector cells mediating wound contraction, whose regulatory role in this process depends on their cellular abundance and functional activity, thereby exerting a profound impact on wound healing outcomes. Recent advances in research pertaining to wound contraction and healing have deepened the mechanistic insights into these intertwined biological processes. Against this backdrop, the present review synthesizes current literature on the multifaceted roles of myofibroblasts in wound contraction and healing, with a particular focus on establishing explicit connections to clinical decision-making in surgical practice. It is anticipated that this work will provide valuable insights to advance both basic research and clinical translation in this field.
{"title":"Advances in the Mechanism of Myofibroblasts in Wound Contraction: Clinical Implications for Surgical Practice.","authors":"Shenzhen Gao, Liying Tu, ZengYang Feng, He Chen, Jinde Lin, Weicheng Gao","doi":"10.1177/00031348261423914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261423914","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wound contraction is a pivotal component of the wound healing cascade, and contractions of moderate intensity and duration can exert a facilitative effect on the healing process to a certain extent. Accumulating evidence indicates that α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)-positive myofibroblasts act as the primary functional effector cells mediating wound contraction, whose regulatory role in this process depends on their cellular abundance and functional activity, thereby exerting a profound impact on wound healing outcomes. Recent advances in research pertaining to wound contraction and healing have deepened the mechanistic insights into these intertwined biological processes. Against this backdrop, the present review synthesizes current literature on the multifaceted roles of myofibroblasts in wound contraction and healing, with a particular focus on establishing explicit connections to clinical decision-making in surgical practice. It is anticipated that this work will provide valuable insights to advance both basic research and clinical translation in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261423914"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146140931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-07DOI: 10.1177/00031348261423919
Jessica Biller, Alba Zevallos, Oscar Tuesta, Adrian Riva, Nina Entcheva, Gina Adrales, Christina Li, Michael Schweitzer, Raul Sebastian
BackgroundHypoalbuminemia is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, but data is limited in the bariatric population. Patients with BMI ≥50 may represent a higher-risk group for malnutrition.MethodsWe analyzed MBSAQIP data (2015-2022) for patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Propensity score matching was used to control for 22 preoperative variables. We compared 30-day outcomes and bariatric-specific complications in patients with albumin <3.5 g/dL vs ≥3.5 g/dL across four groups: SG with BMI ≥50 (analysis 1), RYGB with BMI ≥50 (analysis 2), SG with BMI <50 (analysis 3), and RYGB with BMI <50 (analysis 4).ResultsAmong 728,915 patients, matched cohorts in analyses 1 (n = 17,548), 2 (n = 9459), 3 (n = 16,025), and 4 (n = 6787) had similar preoperative characteristics. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with increased complications across all groups. In patients with BMI ≥50, hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with increased mortality (SG 0.2% vs 0.1%, P = 0.011; RYGB 0.3% vs 0.1%, P < 0.001), unplanned ICU admission (SG 1.0% vs 0.7%, P = 0.020; RYGB 1.6% vs 1.2%, P = 0.034), and non-home discharge (SG 0.8% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001; RYGB 0.9% vs 0.6%, P = 0.009). These mortality differences were not observed in patients with BMI <50.ConclusionHypoalbuminemia is associated with higher complications rates after bariatric surgery and increased mortality in patients with BMI ≥50. Preoperative nutritional optimization is strongly recommended in this high-risk group.
背景:低白蛋白血症与较差的术后预后相关,但在肥胖人群中的数据有限。BMI≥50的患者可能是营养不良的高危人群。方法分析2015-2022年接受袖式胃切除术(SG)或Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)患者的MBSAQIP数据。倾向评分匹配用于控制22个术前变量。我们比较了白蛋白患者的30天结局和肥胖特异性并发症P = 0.011;RYGB 0.3% vs 0.1%, P < 0.001)、计划外ICU入院(SG 1.0% vs 0.7%, P = 0.020; RYGB 1.6% vs 1.2%, P = 0.034)和非居家出院(SG 0.8% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001; RYGB 0.9% vs 0.6%, P = 0.009)。这些死亡率差异在BMI患者中没有观察到
{"title":"Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia is Associated With an Increased Risk of Mortality in Patients With BMI ≥50 Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using the 2015-2022 MBSAQIP Database.","authors":"Jessica Biller, Alba Zevallos, Oscar Tuesta, Adrian Riva, Nina Entcheva, Gina Adrales, Christina Li, Michael Schweitzer, Raul Sebastian","doi":"10.1177/00031348261423919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261423919","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHypoalbuminemia is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, but data is limited in the bariatric population. Patients with BMI ≥50 may represent a higher-risk group for malnutrition.MethodsWe analyzed MBSAQIP data (2015-2022) for patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Propensity score matching was used to control for 22 preoperative variables. We compared 30-day outcomes and bariatric-specific complications in patients with albumin <3.5 g/dL vs ≥3.5 g/dL across four groups: SG with BMI ≥50 (analysis 1), RYGB with BMI ≥50 (analysis 2), SG with BMI <50 (analysis 3), and RYGB with BMI <50 (analysis 4).ResultsAmong 728,915 patients, matched cohorts in analyses 1 (n = 17,548), 2 (n = 9459), 3 (n = 16,025), and 4 (n = 6787) had similar preoperative characteristics. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with increased complications across all groups. In patients with BMI ≥50, hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with increased mortality (SG 0.2% vs 0.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.011; RYGB 0.3% vs 0.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), unplanned ICU admission (SG 1.0% vs 0.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.020; RYGB 1.6% vs 1.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.034), and non-home discharge (SG 0.8% vs 0.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001; RYGB 0.9% vs 0.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.009). These mortality differences were not observed in patients with BMI <50.ConclusionHypoalbuminemia is associated with higher complications rates after bariatric surgery and increased mortality in patients with BMI ≥50. Preoperative nutritional optimization is strongly recommended in this high-risk group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261423919"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146130965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-07DOI: 10.1177/00031348261419758
Kelly Hewitt, Hugh Shoff, James Watkins, S Rob Todd, Wendy R Greene
{"title":"Impact of Federal Health-Care Cuts on Rural Surgery: Report From the SESC Rural Surgeons Webinar.","authors":"Kelly Hewitt, Hugh Shoff, James Watkins, S Rob Todd, Wendy R Greene","doi":"10.1177/00031348261419758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261419758","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261419758"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146130995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults. However, the optimal contrast protocol remains debated, balancing diagnostic accuracy, operational efficiency, and patient safety.ObjectiveTo systematically compare the diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency of different CT contrast protocols-oral, intravenous (IV), combined oral + IV, and non-contrast-in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis.MethodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies compared CT contrast protocols in adults (≥18 years) and reported diagnostic or operational outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value; secondary outcomes included time to CT completion and emergency department (ED) length of stay.ResultsSeventeen studies involving 5033 patients met inclusion criteria. Non-contrast CT demonstrated sensitivity of 82.4-90.5% and specificity of 75-100%. Oral contrast-only protocols showed sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 80%. Combined oral + IV protocols achieved sensitivity of 89.4-100% and specificity of 54.5-98.5%. IV-only protocols provided sensitivity of 77.8-100% and specificity of 87-100%. Across studies, eliminating oral contrast reduced ED length of stay by 29-91 minutes without compromising diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionsIV-only or non-contrast CT protocols offer comparable diagnostic accuracy to oral contrast approaches while significantly improving workflow efficiency. Protocol selection should consider clinical setting and patient factors, reserving oral contrast for select groups such as oncology patients or those with prior abdominal surgery.
背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)是诊断成人急性阑尾炎的首选成像方式。然而,最佳对比方案仍然存在争议,平衡诊断准确性,操作效率和患者安全。目的系统比较口服、静脉(IV)、口服+ IV联合、非对比CT造影剂对成人疑似急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性和操作效率。方法综合检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science自成立至2025年4月。符合条件的研究比较了成人(≥18岁)的CT对比方案,并报告了诊断或手术结果。两名独立审稿人筛选文章,提取数据,并使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险。主要结局为敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值;次要结果包括CT完成时间和急诊科(ED)住院时间。结果17项研究5033例患者符合纳入标准。CT平扫敏感度为82.4 ~ 90.5%,特异度为75 ~ 100%。仅口服对比方案的敏感性为73.5%,特异性为80%。口服+静脉注射方案的敏感性为89.4-100%,特异性为54.5-98.5%。仅iv方案的敏感性为77.8-100%,特异性为87-100%。在所有研究中,消除口腔造影剂可在不影响诊断准确性的情况下将ED的住院时间缩短29-91分钟。结论单纯或非对比CT方案的诊断准确性与口腔对比方法相当,同时显著提高了工作流程效率。方案选择应考虑临床环境和患者因素,为肿瘤患者或既往腹部手术患者等特定组保留口服对比剂。
{"title":"Comparison of CT Protocols in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Operational Efficiency.","authors":"Fahim Kanani, Nuha Riyad, Osama Ewidat, Mohammad Maraqah, Fadi Bder, Anastasiia Iserlis, Narmin Zoabi, Nir Messer, Rina Neeman","doi":"10.1177/00031348261423912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261423912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults. However, the optimal contrast protocol remains debated, balancing diagnostic accuracy, operational efficiency, and patient safety.ObjectiveTo systematically compare the diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiency of different CT contrast protocols-oral, intravenous (IV), combined oral + IV, and non-contrast-in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis.MethodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies compared CT contrast protocols in adults (≥18 years) and reported diagnostic or operational outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value; secondary outcomes included time to CT completion and emergency department (ED) length of stay.ResultsSeventeen studies involving 5033 patients met inclusion criteria. Non-contrast CT demonstrated sensitivity of 82.4-90.5% and specificity of 75-100%. Oral contrast-only protocols showed sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 80%. Combined oral + IV protocols achieved sensitivity of 89.4-100% and specificity of 54.5-98.5%. IV-only protocols provided sensitivity of 77.8-100% and specificity of 87-100%. Across studies, eliminating oral contrast reduced ED length of stay by 29-91 minutes without compromising diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionsIV-only or non-contrast CT protocols offer comparable diagnostic accuracy to oral contrast approaches while significantly improving workflow efficiency. Protocol selection should consider clinical setting and patient factors, reserving oral contrast for select groups such as oncology patients or those with prior abdominal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261423912"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1177/00031348261423921
David Ray Velez, Jared Griffard, Odessa R Pulido, Allison McNickle
IntroductionA "smoker's paradox" has been described in rib fractures for which smokers have demonstrated increased complications but decreased mortality. Alcohol has shown increased mortality risk but the effect of substance use has not been well evaluated. Given the paucity of data surrounding these outcomes, we evaluated the impact of alcohol use, smoking, and substance use disorders on outcomes after traumatic rib fracture.MethodsWe performed a five-year retrospective review for all adult patients admitted to our level 1 trauma center with rib fractures. Each outcome was evaluated independently in a stepwise backward regression model for potential confounding factors. We then performed multivariable linear and logistic regression to examine the relationship between alcohol, smoking, and substance use to outcomes.ResultsIn total, 3,327 patients were included for review. Smoking was associated with increased morbidity but a paradoxical decreased risk of respiratory failure and a 56% decreased risk of mortality. Substance use disorder had increased risk of respiratory failure and complications but a paradoxical 66% decreased risk of mortality. Alcohol use disorder was associated with increased morbidity with no change in mortality and no paradoxical beneficial outcomes. Both alcohol and substance use disorders were associated with significantly prolonged hospital length of stay.ConclusionDespite increased morbidity, both smoking and substance use disorder demonstrated significantly decreased mortality. These findings could support the expansion to a "smoker's and substance use paradox" in traumatic rib fracture although further study is warranted.
{"title":"Differential Associations of Smoking, Alcohol, and Substance Use Disorders With Morbidity and Mortality After Traumatic Rib Fracture.","authors":"David Ray Velez, Jared Griffard, Odessa R Pulido, Allison McNickle","doi":"10.1177/00031348261423921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261423921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionA \"smoker's paradox\" has been described in rib fractures for which smokers have demonstrated increased complications but decreased mortality. Alcohol has shown increased mortality risk but the effect of substance use has not been well evaluated. Given the paucity of data surrounding these outcomes, we evaluated the impact of alcohol use, smoking, and substance use disorders on outcomes after traumatic rib fracture.MethodsWe performed a five-year retrospective review for all adult patients admitted to our level 1 trauma center with rib fractures. Each outcome was evaluated independently in a stepwise backward regression model for potential confounding factors. We then performed multivariable linear and logistic regression to examine the relationship between alcohol, smoking, and substance use to outcomes.ResultsIn total, 3,327 patients were included for review. Smoking was associated with increased morbidity but a paradoxical decreased risk of respiratory failure and a 56% decreased risk of mortality. Substance use disorder had increased risk of respiratory failure and complications but a paradoxical 66% decreased risk of mortality. Alcohol use disorder was associated with increased morbidity with no change in mortality and no paradoxical beneficial outcomes. Both alcohol and substance use disorders were associated with significantly prolonged hospital length of stay.ConclusionDespite increased morbidity, both smoking and substance use disorder demonstrated significantly decreased mortality. These findings could support the expansion to a \"smoker's and substance use paradox\" in traumatic rib fracture although further study is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261423921"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146117529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}