Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-11DOI: 10.1177/00031348251367042
Samer Ganam, Ryan Tang, Joseph Sujka, Rahul Mhaskar, Christopher DuCoin
BackgroundGastrocardiac syndrome is a condition where digestive issues, particularly in the upper gastrointestinal tract, are linked to heart-related symptoms. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia (HH) are notable causes. The release of cytokines near the damaged esophagus may promote atrial fibrillation (AF). Hiatal hernia may lead to anatomical block and arrhythmias. Our systematic review aims to investigate the relationship between treatment of GERD/HH and improvement/resolution of arrhythmias.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from January 2005 to February 2024 using specific terms. Two co-authors screened and reviewed records. Exclusion criteria included cases without post-treatment information and conference abstracts. All study types discussing the relationship between GERD/ HH and arrhythmias were included. Data on patient characteristics, arrhythmia types, treatments, and outcomes were extracted. Murad checklist was utilized for quality assessment.Results13 studies in the review included 11 case reports, 1 case series, and 1 pilot study. Hiatal hernia repair (HHR) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) resolved arrhythmias in case reports and the case series. Proton pump inhibitor treatment for reflux esophagitis reduced AF symptoms in the pilot study. Arrhythmia resolution usually occurred shortly after treatment began. Patients were mostly around 59-62 years old, with more males. Hypertension and esophagitis were common comorbidities. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was the most frequent arrhythmia type. Antiarrhythmic medication was stopped in some cases, and anticoagulation varied.ConclusionHiatal hernia and GERD may contribute to arrhythmias, and early management with surgery and PPIs shows promise in resolving symptoms and reducing medication reliance.
{"title":"Exploring the Link-Hiatal Hernia Repair and GERD Treatments for Managing Arrhythmias: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Samer Ganam, Ryan Tang, Joseph Sujka, Rahul Mhaskar, Christopher DuCoin","doi":"10.1177/00031348251367042","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251367042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGastrocardiac syndrome is a condition where digestive issues, particularly in the upper gastrointestinal tract, are linked to heart-related symptoms. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia (HH) are notable causes. The release of cytokines near the damaged esophagus may promote atrial fibrillation (AF). Hiatal hernia may lead to anatomical block and arrhythmias. Our systematic review aims to investigate the relationship between treatment of GERD/HH and improvement/resolution of arrhythmias.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from January 2005 to February 2024 using specific terms. Two co-authors screened and reviewed records. Exclusion criteria included cases without post-treatment information and conference abstracts. All study types discussing the relationship between GERD/ HH and arrhythmias were included. Data on patient characteristics, arrhythmia types, treatments, and outcomes were extracted. Murad checklist was utilized for quality assessment.Results13 studies in the review included 11 case reports, 1 case series, and 1 pilot study. Hiatal hernia repair (HHR) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) resolved arrhythmias in case reports and the case series. Proton pump inhibitor treatment for reflux esophagitis reduced AF symptoms in the pilot study. Arrhythmia resolution usually occurred shortly after treatment began. Patients were mostly around 59-62 years old, with more males. Hypertension and esophagitis were common comorbidities. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was the most frequent arrhythmia type. Antiarrhythmic medication was stopped in some cases, and anticoagulation varied.ConclusionHiatal hernia and GERD may contribute to arrhythmias, and early management with surgery and PPIs shows promise in resolving symptoms and reducing medication reliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"404-413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144820392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1177/00031348251371206
Nathan Walter, Taylor L Wilkinson, Nicole Nuñez, Mekaea Spaulding, Glendon A Hyde
Chordomas are a rare malignancy of the axial spine arising from primitive notochordal cells. Optimal management entails en bloc resection with negative margins, with some evidence to support adjuvant radiotherapy. Failure to achieve adequate margins has been shown to result in a higher rate of recurrence. Frequent involvement of major pelvic structures further complicates their surgical management, and multidisciplinary teams are best suited to perform these resections. Here, we present a patient with a large, locally invasive sacral chordoma and review recent literature surrounding the current management of such chordomas. A 52-year-old male was found to have an infiltrating mass after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate for rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Computerized tomography (CT)-guided biopsy confirmed diagnosis of sacral chordoma, and the patient underwent excision with a two-stage operation utilizing a combined anterior-posterior approach. After a 49-day hospitalization complicated by small bowel obstruction (SBO), he was discharged to inpatient rehab (IPR), with subsequent receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy and no recurrence at 1 year of follow-up. A narrative review of pertinent literature over the last 20 years (2005-2025) was completed. Our search strategy identified 68 articles, allowing in-depth discussion of topics including tumor workup, surgical approach, emerging operative technologies, prognostic factors contributing to recurrence and survival rates, and the benefit of excision at high-volume centers.
{"title":"Two-Stage Excision of Advanced, Infiltrative Sacral Chordoma.","authors":"Nathan Walter, Taylor L Wilkinson, Nicole Nuñez, Mekaea Spaulding, Glendon A Hyde","doi":"10.1177/00031348251371206","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251371206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chordomas are a rare malignancy of the axial spine arising from primitive notochordal cells. Optimal management entails en bloc resection with negative margins, with some evidence to support adjuvant radiotherapy. Failure to achieve adequate margins has been shown to result in a higher rate of recurrence. Frequent involvement of major pelvic structures further complicates their surgical management, and multidisciplinary teams are best suited to perform these resections. Here, we present a patient with a large, locally invasive sacral chordoma and review recent literature surrounding the current management of such chordomas. A 52-year-old male was found to have an infiltrating mass after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate for rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Computerized tomography (CT)-guided biopsy confirmed diagnosis of sacral chordoma, and the patient underwent excision with a two-stage operation utilizing a combined anterior-posterior approach. After a 49-day hospitalization complicated by small bowel obstruction (SBO), he was discharged to inpatient rehab (IPR), with subsequent receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy and no recurrence at 1 year of follow-up. A narrative review of pertinent literature over the last 20 years (2005-2025) was completed. Our search strategy identified 68 articles, allowing in-depth discussion of topics including tumor workup, surgical approach, emerging operative technologies, prognostic factors contributing to recurrence and survival rates, and the benefit of excision at high-volume centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"560-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1177/00031348241268016
Andrew M Loudon, Hunter J Landwehr, Jared B Hinton, Joseph A Posluszny, Brandon S Radow, Matthew L Moorman
High-energy, blunt force trauma to the abdomen results in an abdominal wall injury (AWI) in up to 9% of patients. In 1% of blunt abdominal trauma, they result in a traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH). Optimal management of these injuries remains unclear. Because they are the result of a high-energy mechanism, concomitant serious abdominal organ injuries are common. This has prompted some to advocate that the presence of a TAWH on physical exam mandates exploratory laparotomy. However, delayed repairs have better outcomes and nontherapeutic celiotomy should be avoided. Similarly debated is the expanding use of minimally invasive techniques and the use of mesh for hernia repairs. Overall, the presence of a TAWH is likely not an absolute indication for emergency surgery. Rather, it is an indicator of high-energy impact and associated with a high rate of visceral injury. These patients require a close observation for clinical decline and development of typical indicators for laparotomy.
{"title":"Optimal Management of Traumatic Abdominal Wall Hernias Remains Unclear.","authors":"Andrew M Loudon, Hunter J Landwehr, Jared B Hinton, Joseph A Posluszny, Brandon S Radow, Matthew L Moorman","doi":"10.1177/00031348241268016","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348241268016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-energy, blunt force trauma to the abdomen results in an abdominal wall injury (AWI) in up to 9% of patients. In 1% of blunt abdominal trauma, they result in a traumatic abdominal wall hernia (TAWH). Optimal management of these injuries remains unclear. Because they are the result of a high-energy mechanism, concomitant serious abdominal organ injuries are common. This has prompted some to advocate that the presence of a TAWH on physical exam mandates exploratory laparotomy. However, delayed repairs have better outcomes and nontherapeutic celiotomy should be avoided. Similarly debated is the expanding use of minimally invasive techniques and the use of mesh for hernia repairs. Overall, the presence of a TAWH is likely not an absolute indication for emergency surgery. Rather, it is an indicator of high-energy impact and associated with a high rate of visceral injury. These patients require a close observation for clinical decline and development of typical indicators for laparotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"605-608"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1177/00031348251376683
Claire Perez, Lucas Weiser, Kellie Knabe, Charles Fuller, Sevannah Soukiasian, Hrag Bairamian, Bryan Navarro, Raffaele Rocco, Philicia Moonsamy, Harmik J Soukiasian, Andrew R Brownlee
IntroductionIntegrated cardiothoracic surgery residency programs were introduced in 2008 in response to a decline in cardiothoracic surgery trainees. Since their inception, the number of integrated programs has grown, while the availability of independent fellowships has diminished. We hypothesize that the rise in integrated residencies will adversely affect the number of general thoracic surgery graduates.MethodsWe reviewed websites and social media pages of all accredited integrated cardiothoracic surgery residency programs and independent fellowships from 2020 to 2024. Programs without graduates or publicly available graduate data during this period were excluded. Data on each graduate's first position after residency was obtained.ResultsSince 2008, the number of traditional cardiothoracic surgery fellowship positions has decreased by 29.2% (130 to 92), while integrated positions have increased 16-fold (3 to 48). Of the 479 alumni, 330 pursued cardiac surgery and 149 pursued thoracic surgery. Among cardiac surgeons, 30.6% (101) completed additional training post-residency, compared to 6.7% (10) of thoracic surgeons. Graduates from 2021 and 2022 were significantly less likely to pursue thoracic surgery compared to 2020 (OR 0.485, 95% CI 0.241-0.974, P = .042; OR 0.491, 95% CI 0.244-0.988, P = .046). Only 5.4% (8) of integrated program alumni entered thoracic surgery, with these graduates having 86.3% lower odds of pursuing thoracic surgery than those from independent fellowships (OR 0.137, 95% CI 0.0610-0.310, P < .001). Program leadership specialty did not significantly impact outcomes.ConclusionThe increasing number of integrated cardiothoracic residency positions and decreasing independent fellowship opportunities contribute to a shrinking general thoracic surgery workforce, as most integrated program graduates enter cardiac surgery.
综合心胸外科住院医师计划于2008年推出,以应对心胸外科培训生的下降。自成立以来,综合项目的数量不断增加,而独立奖学金的数量却在减少。我们假设综合住院医师的增加将对普通胸外科毕业生的数量产生不利影响。方法回顾2020 - 2024年所有经认证的心胸外科综合住院医师项目和独立奖学金项目的网站和社交媒体页面。在此期间没有毕业生或公开毕业生数据的项目被排除在外。获得了每位毕业生在实习期结束后的第一份工作的数据。结果2008年以来,传统心胸外科医师职位从130个减少到92个,减少了29.2%,而综合职位从3个增加到48个,增加了16倍。在479名校友中,330人从事心脏外科,149人从事胸外科。在心脏外科医生中,30.6%(101)在住院后完成了额外的培训,相比之下,6.7%(10)的胸外科医生完成了额外的培训。与2020年的毕业生相比,2021年和2022年的毕业生选择胸外科的可能性显著降低(OR 0.485, 95% CI 0.241-0.974, P = 0.042; OR 0.491, 95% CI 0.244-0.988, P = 0.046)。只有5.4%(8)的综合项目毕业生进入胸外科,这些毕业生从事胸外科工作的几率比独立项目毕业生低86.3% (OR 0.137, 95% CI 0.0610-0.310, P < .001)。项目领导专长对结果没有显著影响。综合胸外科住院医师职位的增加和独立研究员机会的减少导致了普通胸外科劳动力的萎缩,因为大多数综合项目的毕业生都进入了心脏外科。
{"title":"Integrated Cardiothoracic Surgery Residency Programs Largely Produce Cardiac Surgeons-Is the General Thoracic Surgeon an Endangered Species?","authors":"Claire Perez, Lucas Weiser, Kellie Knabe, Charles Fuller, Sevannah Soukiasian, Hrag Bairamian, Bryan Navarro, Raffaele Rocco, Philicia Moonsamy, Harmik J Soukiasian, Andrew R Brownlee","doi":"10.1177/00031348251376683","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251376683","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionIntegrated cardiothoracic surgery residency programs were introduced in 2008 in response to a decline in cardiothoracic surgery trainees. Since their inception, the number of integrated programs has grown, while the availability of independent fellowships has diminished. We hypothesize that the rise in integrated residencies will adversely affect the number of general thoracic surgery graduates.MethodsWe reviewed websites and social media pages of all accredited integrated cardiothoracic surgery residency programs and independent fellowships from 2020 to 2024. Programs without graduates or publicly available graduate data during this period were excluded. Data on each graduate's first position after residency was obtained.ResultsSince 2008, the number of traditional cardiothoracic surgery fellowship positions has decreased by 29.2% (130 to 92), while integrated positions have increased 16-fold (3 to 48). Of the 479 alumni, 330 pursued cardiac surgery and 149 pursued thoracic surgery. Among cardiac surgeons, 30.6% (101) completed additional training post-residency, compared to 6.7% (10) of thoracic surgeons. Graduates from 2021 and 2022 were significantly less likely to pursue thoracic surgery compared to 2020 (OR 0.485, 95% CI 0.241-0.974, <i>P</i> = .042; OR 0.491, 95% CI 0.244-0.988, <i>P</i> = .046). Only 5.4% (8) of integrated program alumni entered thoracic surgery, with these graduates having 86.3% lower odds of pursuing thoracic surgery than those from independent fellowships (OR 0.137, 95% CI 0.0610-0.310, <i>P</i> < .001). Program leadership specialty did not significantly impact outcomes.ConclusionThe increasing number of integrated cardiothoracic residency positions and decreasing independent fellowship opportunities contribute to a shrinking general thoracic surgery workforce, as most integrated program graduates enter cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"467-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Incarcerated or threatened bowel obstruction with suspected intestinal ischemia requires prompt surgical intervention. This retrospective case series, involving 8 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, evaluated the feasibility of combining indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence and Doppler ultrasound for intraoperative bowel viability assessment. Indocyanine green was injected intravenously. Doppler assessment was performed using a high-frequency linear probe along the antimesenteric border. No patients required bowel resection. In 2 cases, initial ICG findings suggested non-viability, but Doppler ultrasound demonstrated preserved arterial flow. A second ICG injection showed fine granular fluorescence, allowing bowel preservation. The combination of modalities helped avoid unnecessary resections. Indocyanine green is safe and repeatable but limited by reduced signal in edematous tissue and subjectivity. Doppler ultrasound offers objective flow confirmation and may guide delayed reassessment. Despite a small sample size and selection bias, these findings support cautious, stepwise approaches in borderline cases and the need for multicenter prospective trials in emergency surgical settings.
{"title":"Intraoperative Assessment of Bowel Viability Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence and Doppler Ultrasound in Incarcerated or Threatened Bowel Obstruction.","authors":"Yusuke Matsune, Takeshi Aoki, Yoshihiko Tashiro, Kimiyasu Yamazaki, Yukari Shinohara, Shodai Nagaishi, Ryo Katayama, Kodai Tomioka, Tetsuya Kitajima, Kazuhiro Matsuda, Tomokazu Kusano, Hiromi Date, Ryohei Watanabe, Makoto Watanabe, Hiroki Yamaue","doi":"10.1177/00031348251378905","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251378905","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incarcerated or threatened bowel obstruction with suspected intestinal ischemia requires prompt surgical intervention. This retrospective case series, involving 8 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, evaluated the feasibility of combining indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence and Doppler ultrasound for intraoperative bowel viability assessment. Indocyanine green was injected intravenously. Doppler assessment was performed using a high-frequency linear probe along the antimesenteric border. No patients required bowel resection. In 2 cases, initial ICG findings suggested non-viability, but Doppler ultrasound demonstrated preserved arterial flow. A second ICG injection showed fine granular fluorescence, allowing bowel preservation. The combination of modalities helped avoid unnecessary resections. Indocyanine green is safe and repeatable but limited by reduced signal in edematous tissue and subjectivity. Doppler ultrasound offers objective flow confirmation and may guide delayed reassessment. Despite a small sample size and selection bias, these findings support cautious, stepwise approaches in borderline cases and the need for multicenter prospective trials in emergency surgical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"619-621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145028746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1177/00031348251372416
Camille Meschia, Andrew Manhan, Daniel Weigle, Rachel Warner, Jeanette Zhang, Marie Crandall, Leon Haley, David Skarupa
IntroductionCritical care is a core component of resident education across multiple specialties. At this institution, nighttime supervision was previously provided by the on-call acute care surgeon. The CCRI model is a multidisciplinary team of fellowship trained intensivists who provide in-house overnight coverage. A prior study looked at the perceptions of general surgery residents on the impact of the CCRI model on education and patient care. This study expands our inquiry to compare the experience of residents across multiple specialties.MethodsAnonymous surveys were sent to anesthesiology (AN), emergency medicine (EM), internal medicine (IM), and general surgery (GS) residents using the Qualtrics platform. Demographic information included postgraduate year (PGY), specialty, and relationship to implementation of CCRI. 4-Point Likert Scale and free text questions were included.ResultsOf 138 total residents (16 AN, 46 EM, 51 IM, and 25 GS), 82 completed the survey (59.4%). Respondent stratification included 31 PGY-1 (38%), 22 PGY-2 (27%), 17 PGY-3 (21%), 6 PGY-4 (7%), 6 PGY-5 (7%); 11 AN (14%), 18 EM (22%), 29 IM (35%), and 24 GS (29%). Composites of strongly agree/agree show positive perception of attending availability (95%), improved patient care (98%), education (87%), and procedural skill (78%) and disagree/strongly disagree show negative perception of limiting autonomy (79%) or detracting from education (83%).ConclusionsThe CCRI model was implemented to enhance educational and clinical support of residents in the ICU overnight. Across multiple disciplines and training years, residents have indicated a favorable impact of the CCRI on education, clinical support, and procedural skill with no significant impairment to autonomy.
{"title":"The Impact of Overnight In-House Critical Care Resource Intensivist (CCRI) on Multidisciplinary Resident Education.","authors":"Camille Meschia, Andrew Manhan, Daniel Weigle, Rachel Warner, Jeanette Zhang, Marie Crandall, Leon Haley, David Skarupa","doi":"10.1177/00031348251372416","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251372416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionCritical care is a core component of resident education across multiple specialties. At this institution, nighttime supervision was previously provided by the on-call acute care surgeon. The CCRI model is a multidisciplinary team of fellowship trained intensivists who provide in-house overnight coverage. A prior study looked at the perceptions of general surgery residents on the impact of the CCRI model on education and patient care. This study expands our inquiry to compare the experience of residents across multiple specialties.MethodsAnonymous surveys were sent to anesthesiology (AN), emergency medicine (EM), internal medicine (IM), and general surgery (GS) residents using the Qualtrics platform. Demographic information included postgraduate year (PGY), specialty, and relationship to implementation of CCRI. 4-Point Likert Scale and free text questions were included.ResultsOf 138 total residents (16 AN, 46 EM, 51 IM, and 25 GS), 82 completed the survey (59.4%). Respondent stratification included 31 PGY-1 (38%), 22 PGY-2 (27%), 17 PGY-3 (21%), 6 PGY-4 (7%), 6 PGY-5 (7%); 11 AN (14%), 18 EM (22%), 29 IM (35%), and 24 GS (29%). Composites of strongly agree/agree show positive perception of attending availability (95%), improved patient care (98%), education (87%), and procedural skill (78%) and disagree/strongly disagree show negative perception of limiting autonomy (79%) or detracting from education (83%).ConclusionsThe CCRI model was implemented to enhance educational and clinical support of residents in the ICU overnight. Across multiple disciplines and training years, residents have indicated a favorable impact of the CCRI on education, clinical support, and procedural skill with no significant impairment to autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"521-526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145068871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1177/00031348251371195
Steven A Medeiros, Dylan J Carmichael, Summre N Blakely, Tiffany Tse, Conor M Eufemio, Matthew S Factor
BackgroundWhile numerous studies regarding the need for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of suspected blunt cervical spine injury (BCSI) exist, the resulting recommendations are often conflicting and are less reliably applicable to non-examinable or National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS)-positive patients. This study sought to identify the utility of MRI in characterizing BCSI in such patients who had already undergone computed tomography (CT) imaging of the cervical spine.MethodsRecords from 402 unique patients presenting to a Level 1 trauma center were analyzed. Incidence of positive MRI in the setting of negative CT, unstable BCSI on either modality, need for surgical intervention, time in a cervical collar, and hospital readmission rates were calculated.ResultsNon-examinable or NEXUS-positive patients with BCSI identified on both CT and MRI were less likely to have a stable BCSI compared to CT-positive alone (53% vs 88%, P = 0.001). Out of 189 CT-negative patients, 53 (28%) were found to have BCSI on MRI, with 13 (6.8% overall) requiring operative intervention. Out of 100 BCSIs read as "stable" on CT, 28 (23.1%) were deemed "unstable" on subsequent MRI. Patients with negative MRI findings spent less time in a cervical collar than patients with positive findings (median 2 days vs 57 days, P < 0.001) and had lower 180-day readmission rates (12 patients [7.5%] vs 35 [15%], P = 0.031).ConclusionWhile CT remains vital for diagnosing BCSI, non-examinable or NEXUS-positive patients with negative CT should undergo confirmatory MRI prior to cervical collar removal.
背景:虽然存在大量关于需要磁共振成像(MRI)来评估疑似钝性颈椎损伤(BCSI)的研究,但得出的建议往往是相互矛盾的,并且不太可靠地适用于未检查或国家紧急x线摄影应用研究(NEXUS)阳性的患者。本研究旨在确定MRI在已接受颈椎计算机断层扫描(CT)成像的BCSI患者中的应用。方法对402例到某一级创伤中心就诊的特殊患者的资料进行分析。计算CT阴性背景下MRI阳性的发生率、两种模式下BCSI不稳定的发生率、手术干预的需要、颈套时间和再入院率。结果CT和MRI均发现BCSI的未检查或nexus阳性患者与单独CT阳性患者相比,BCSI稳定的可能性更小(53% vs 88%, P = 0.001)。189例ct阴性患者中,53例(28%)在MRI上发现BCSI, 13例(总体6.8%)需要手术干预。在100例bcsi中,CT显示为“稳定”的,随后的MRI显示为“不稳定”的有28例(23.1%)。MRI阴性患者比阳性患者在颈套内停留的时间更短(中位2天vs 57天,P < 0.001), 180天再入院率更低(12例[7.5%]vs 35例[15%],P = 0.031)。结论CT对于BCSI的诊断仍然至关重要,CT阴性的未检查或nexus阳性患者应在取下颈套前进行确认性MRI检查。
{"title":"The Utility of Cervical Spine MRI in Non-Examinable or NEXUS-Positive Patients With Suspected Blunt Cervical Spine Trauma.","authors":"Steven A Medeiros, Dylan J Carmichael, Summre N Blakely, Tiffany Tse, Conor M Eufemio, Matthew S Factor","doi":"10.1177/00031348251371195","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251371195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhile numerous studies regarding the need for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of suspected blunt cervical spine injury (BCSI) exist, the resulting recommendations are often conflicting and are less reliably applicable to non-examinable or National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS)-positive patients. This study sought to identify the utility of MRI in characterizing BCSI in such patients who had already undergone computed tomography (CT) imaging of the cervical spine.MethodsRecords from 402 unique patients presenting to a Level 1 trauma center were analyzed. Incidence of positive MRI in the setting of negative CT, unstable BCSI on either modality, need for surgical intervention, time in a cervical collar, and hospital readmission rates were calculated.ResultsNon-examinable or NEXUS-positive patients with BCSI identified on both CT and MRI were less likely to have a stable BCSI compared to CT-positive alone (53% vs 88%, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Out of 189 CT-negative patients, 53 (28%) were found to have BCSI on MRI, with 13 (6.8% overall) requiring operative intervention. Out of 100 BCSIs read as \"stable\" on CT, 28 (23.1%) were deemed \"unstable\" on subsequent MRI. Patients with negative MRI findings spent less time in a cervical collar than patients with positive findings (median 2 days vs 57 days, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and had lower 180-day readmission rates (12 patients [7.5%] vs 35 [15%], <i>P</i> = 0.031).ConclusionWhile CT remains vital for diagnosing BCSI, non-examinable or NEXUS-positive patients with negative CT should undergo confirmatory MRI prior to cervical collar removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"421-428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BackgroundRecently, the number of older esophageal cancer patients has increased. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy, a minimally invasive surgery, is expected to improve surgical and clinical outcomes. But its outcome in older adults remains unclear. We aim to investigate the feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in older patients.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 132 thoracic esophageal cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy between January 2014 and January 2024. The patients were divided into 2 groups: non-older (<75 years) and older (≥75 years). A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was conducted based on sex, clinical T stage, and clinical N stage, resulting in 30 matched pairs. Patient characteristics, surgical procedures, postoperative complications, changes in nutritional status, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsPreoperative serum albumin levels were found to be lower in the older group compared to the non-older group (P <.05); nonetheless, the nutritional status of 6 months after esophagectomy was similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant intergroup differences in the incidences of recurrent nerve palsy, pneumonia, and anastomotic leakage (older vs non-older group: 13.3% vs 13.3%, P = 1.0; 16.6% vs 20.0%, P = 0.73; and 13.3% vs 13.3%, P = 1.0, respectively). The in-hospital mortality rate for the older group was 2.9%, showing no significant difference compared with the non-older group (P = 0.14). Overall, the OS was poor in the older group (P <.05); however, it was similar between the 2 groups after PSM (P = 0.36).DiscussionFor older patients, minimally invasive esophageal surgery is a feasible and safe option, offering acceptable short- and long-term outcomes.
近年来,老年食管癌患者的数量有所增加。胸腔镜食管切除术是一种微创手术,有望改善手术和临床效果。但它对老年人的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是探讨胸腔镜食管切除术在老年患者中的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2024年1月期间行胸腔镜食管切除术的132例胸段食管癌患者。将患者分为两组:非老年组(P P = 1.0;16.6% vs 20.0%, P = 0.73;13.3% vs 13.3%, P = 1.0)。老年组住院死亡率为2.9%,与非老年组比较差异无统计学意义(P = 0.14)。总体而言,老年组的OS较差(P P = 0.36)。对于老年患者,微创食管手术是一种可行且安全的选择,可提供可接受的短期和长期结果。
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery for Older Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score-matched Study.","authors":"Katsushi Takebayashi, Sachiko Kaida, Reiko Otake, Asuka Fukuo, Toru Miyake, Masatsugu Kojima, Soichiro Tani, Hiromitsu Maehira, Nobuhito Nitta, Hajime Ishikawa, Masaji Tani","doi":"10.1177/00031348251363503","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251363503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRecently, the number of older esophageal cancer patients has increased. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy, a minimally invasive surgery, is expected to improve surgical and clinical outcomes. But its outcome in older adults remains unclear. We aim to investigate the feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in older patients.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 132 thoracic esophageal cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy between January 2014 and January 2024. The patients were divided into 2 groups: non-older (<75 years) and older (≥75 years). A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was conducted based on sex, clinical T stage, and clinical N stage, resulting in 30 matched pairs. Patient characteristics, surgical procedures, postoperative complications, changes in nutritional status, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsPreoperative serum albumin levels were found to be lower in the older group compared to the non-older group (<i>P</i> <.05); nonetheless, the nutritional status of 6 months after esophagectomy was similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant intergroup differences in the incidences of recurrent nerve palsy, pneumonia, and anastomotic leakage (older vs non-older group: 13.3% vs 13.3%, <i>P</i> = 1.0; 16.6% vs 20.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.73; and 13.3% vs 13.3%, <i>P</i> = 1.0, respectively). The in-hospital mortality rate for the older group was 2.9%, showing no significant difference compared with the non-older group (<i>P</i> = 0.14). Overall, the OS was poor in the older group (<i>P</i> <.05); however, it was similar between the 2 groups after PSM (<i>P</i> = 0.36).DiscussionFor older patients, minimally invasive esophageal surgery is a feasible and safe option, offering acceptable short- and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"329-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144740973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-10DOI: 10.1177/00031348251378907
Herbert Downton-Ramos, Aulon Jerliu, Emma Danes, Mathew Lissauer, Daniel Ricaurte
BackgroundResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is increasingly used for hemorrhage control in trauma patients, yet its role in blunt pelvic trauma remains controversial. This study evaluates outcomes in hypotensive patients with blunt pelvic trauma undergoing hemorrhage control surgery, comparing those who received zone 3 REBOA to those who did not.MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the ACS Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use File (TQP-PUF) from 2016 to 2019. Adult patients (≥18 years) with hypotension (SBP <100 mmHg) and blunt pelvic trauma who underwent surgical hemorrhage control were included. Exclusion criteria included traumatic brain injury, preperitoneal packing, resuscitative thoracotomy/sternotomy, and bleeding diatheses. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to compare patients who received zone 3 REBOA versus those who did not. Primary outcomes were 24-hour and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, acute kidney injury (AKI), and lower extremity amputation.ResultsOf 4453 patients, 139 underwent REBOA. After matching, 121 patients remained per group. REBOA patients had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (50.5% vs 25.0%, P < 0.001) and 24-hour mortality (31.0% vs 14.3%, P = 0.002). The median PRBC transfusion was greater at 4 hours (4000 mL vs 1750 mL) and 24 hours (5600 mL vs 2800 mL) in the REBOA group (both P < 0.001). Acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in REBOA patients (15.7% vs 6.6%, P = 0.025).ConclusionsZone 3 REBOA in hypotensive blunt pelvic trauma was associated with higher mortality and transfusion needs. These findings highlight the need for cautious use and further prospective investigation.
背景:复苏血管内球囊阻断主动脉(REBOA)越来越多地用于创伤患者的出血控制,但其在钝性骨盆创伤中的作用仍存在争议。本研究评估了钝性骨盆创伤的低血压患者接受出血控制手术的结果,比较了接受3区REBOA和未接受REBOA的患者。方法采用2016 - 2019年ACS创伤质量项目参与者使用档案(TQP-PUF)进行回顾性队列分析。成人患者(≥18岁)伴有低血压(收缩压P < 0.001)和24小时死亡率(31.0% vs 14.3%, P = 0.002)。REBOA组中位PRBC输注在4小时(4000 mL vs 1750 mL)和24小时(5600 mL vs 2800 mL)时更高(P均< 0.001)。REBOA患者发生急性肾损伤的频率更高(15.7% vs 6.6%, P = 0.025)。结论低血压钝性骨盆外伤患者的3区REBOA与较高的死亡率和输血需求相关。这些发现强调了谨慎使用和进一步前瞻性研究的必要性。
{"title":"Zone 3 REBOA Use in Hypotensive Patients With Blunt Pelvic Trauma Requiring Hemorrhage Control Surgery: A National Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Herbert Downton-Ramos, Aulon Jerliu, Emma Danes, Mathew Lissauer, Daniel Ricaurte","doi":"10.1177/00031348251378907","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251378907","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is increasingly used for hemorrhage control in trauma patients, yet its role in blunt pelvic trauma remains controversial. This study evaluates outcomes in hypotensive patients with blunt pelvic trauma undergoing hemorrhage control surgery, comparing those who received zone 3 REBOA to those who did not.MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the ACS Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use File (TQP-PUF) from 2016 to 2019. Adult patients (≥18 years) with hypotension (SBP <100 mmHg) and blunt pelvic trauma who underwent surgical hemorrhage control were included. Exclusion criteria included traumatic brain injury, preperitoneal packing, resuscitative thoracotomy/sternotomy, and bleeding diatheses. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to compare patients who received zone 3 REBOA versus those who did not. Primary outcomes were 24-hour and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, acute kidney injury (AKI), and lower extremity amputation.ResultsOf 4453 patients, 139 underwent REBOA. After matching, 121 patients remained per group. REBOA patients had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (50.5% vs 25.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 24-hour mortality (31.0% vs 14.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The median PRBC transfusion was greater at 4 hours (4000 mL vs 1750 mL) and 24 hours (5600 mL vs 2800 mL) in the REBOA group (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). Acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in REBOA patients (15.7% vs 6.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.025).ConclusionsZone 3 REBOA in hypotensive blunt pelvic trauma was associated with higher mortality and transfusion needs. These findings highlight the need for cautious use and further prospective investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"484-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145032593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-13DOI: 10.1177/00031348251378910
Shachi Srivatsa, Mehak Chawla, Marlene Hernandez, Grace Mallampalli, Angela Duff, Ghee Rye Lee, Emily Frucci, Daniel S Eiferman
BackgroundHelicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) provide rapid transport for trauma patients to specialized centers, potentially improving outcomes in life-threatening situations. However, HEMS is costly and often overutilized, with limited benefit in low-acuity cases. This study re-evaluates HEMS utilization at our Level I trauma center to assess current appropriateness based on clinical need and validated triage criteria.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all trauma patients transported to our institution by helicopter from January 2018-December 2021. Patients were categorized into trauma activation criteria and if any procedural intervention was performed within 1 hour of transport. Of the patients that received a procedure during admission, type of procedure and specialty that performed the procedure were evaluated. Disposition from trauma bay was collected.Results1419 helicopter transports met inclusion criteria during our analyzed time frame. 37.8% (n = 536) required a procedural intervention during their admission. Only 1.5% of patients (n = 21) who received an intervention were treated within 1 hour of arrival. Less than 30% of patients met criteria for helicopter transport when evaluated with current established national guidelines for prehospital triage. 35% of patients required ICU admission, while 8% were discharged to home within 24 hours. 36.3% (n = 515) of patients were activated as a Level I trauma alert upon arrival.ConclusionsMost helicopter transports were not clinically justified based on urgency or national triage guidelines. These findings highlight persistent overuse of HEMS and reinforce the need for standardized, evidence-based criteria to guide both scene and interfacility helicopter transport decisions in trauma care.
{"title":"Helicopter Transport of Trauma Patients Continues to be Overutilized: A Call for Universal Transport Criterion.","authors":"Shachi Srivatsa, Mehak Chawla, Marlene Hernandez, Grace Mallampalli, Angela Duff, Ghee Rye Lee, Emily Frucci, Daniel S Eiferman","doi":"10.1177/00031348251378910","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251378910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHelicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) provide rapid transport for trauma patients to specialized centers, potentially improving outcomes in life-threatening situations. However, HEMS is costly and often overutilized, with limited benefit in low-acuity cases. This study re-evaluates HEMS utilization at our Level I trauma center to assess current appropriateness based on clinical need and validated triage criteria.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all trauma patients transported to our institution by helicopter from January 2018-December 2021. Patients were categorized into trauma activation criteria and if any procedural intervention was performed within 1 hour of transport. Of the patients that received a procedure during admission, type of procedure and specialty that performed the procedure were evaluated. Disposition from trauma bay was collected.Results1419 helicopter transports met inclusion criteria during our analyzed time frame. 37.8% (n = 536) required a procedural intervention during their admission. Only 1.5% of patients (n = 21) who received an intervention were treated within 1 hour of arrival. Less than 30% of patients met criteria for helicopter transport when evaluated with current established national guidelines for prehospital triage. 35% of patients required ICU admission, while 8% were discharged to home within 24 hours. 36.3% (n = 515) of patients were activated as a Level I trauma alert upon arrival.ConclusionsMost helicopter transports were not clinically justified based on urgency or national triage guidelines. These findings highlight persistent overuse of HEMS and reinforce the need for standardized, evidence-based criteria to guide both scene and interfacility helicopter transport decisions in trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"543-549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145051585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}