Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-21DOI: 10.1177/00031348251355165
Don K Nakayama
The rise of England as a global empire in the Seven Years' War (1756-1763) depended on the health of the seamen in the Royal Navy. Under constant danger from combat and manning a sailing battleship in open water, their greatest risk were contagious disease and dietary deficiencies, notably scurvy. During the conflict disease and desertion resulted in nearly 100 times the deaths from direct contact with the enemy. Tasked with the treatment of grievous injuries far from land, ship's surgeons had the greater responsibility of maintaining the general health and nutrition of the crew. Reformists like James Lind, Sir Gilbert Blane, and Thomas Trotter led to improvements in nutrition, especially the general issue of antiscorbutic fruit, fruit juice, and fresh vegetables; smallpox vaccination; and improved cleanliness of clothing and berths. The better overall health of its seamen was an important factor in the Royal Navy's decisive victory over France at the Battle of Trafalgar (1805).
英国在七年战争(1756-1763)中崛起为全球帝国,依靠的是皇家海军海员的健康。在战斗和在开阔水域的航行战舰上,他们面临着不断的危险,最大的风险是传染病和饮食不足,尤其是坏血病。在冲突期间,疾病和逃兵造成的死亡人数几乎是与敌人直接接触造成的死亡人数的100倍。船上的外科医生的任务是在远离陆地的地方治疗严重的伤病,他们有更大的责任来维持船员的总体健康和营养。像詹姆斯·林德、吉尔伯特·布莱恩爵士和托马斯·特罗特这样的改革家改善了营养,特别是抗坏血病水果、果汁和新鲜蔬菜的普遍问题;天花疫苗接种;改善了衣服和铺位的清洁度。1805年,英国皇家海军在特拉法加海战(Battle of Trafalgar, 1805)中对法国取得了决定性的胜利,海员的整体健康状况较好是一个重要因素。
{"title":"Ships Surgeons as Physicians and Hygienists: Health at Sea During the Seven Years' War and Napoleonic Wars.","authors":"Don K Nakayama","doi":"10.1177/00031348251355165","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251355165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rise of England as a global empire in the Seven Years' War (1756-1763) depended on the health of the seamen in the Royal Navy. Under constant danger from combat and manning a sailing battleship in open water, their greatest risk were contagious disease and dietary deficiencies, notably scurvy. During the conflict disease and desertion resulted in nearly 100 times the deaths from direct contact with the enemy. Tasked with the treatment of grievous injuries far from land, ship's surgeons had the greater responsibility of maintaining the general health and nutrition of the crew. Reformists like James Lind, Sir Gilbert Blane, and Thomas Trotter led to improvements in nutrition, especially the general issue of antiscorbutic fruit, fruit juice, and fresh vegetables; smallpox vaccination; and improved cleanliness of clothing and berths. The better overall health of its seamen was an important factor in the Royal Navy's decisive victory over France at the Battle of Trafalgar (1805).</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"304-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144339843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.1177/00031348251358438
Kevin J Lang, Dina M Filiberto, Rachel M Landisch, Regan F Williams, Saskya E Byerly
Background: Adolescent trauma patients (ATPs) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are a population with challenges to standardizing treatment practices and optimizing outcomes. Adult trauma centers (ATCs) and pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) may have different care practices and outcomes for ATPs with severe TBI. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed querying the 2020-2022 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, observing treatments and outcomes for ATPs aged 10-19 years old with head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 3-5 and TBI diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed for tracheostomy, neurosurgical interventions, and mortality. Results: 28,527 ATPs were included in the study. 3,744 (13%) and 24,783 (87%) were treated at PTCs and ATCs, respectively. Most patients (73%) were male and had a blunt mechanism (89%). Patients at ATCs had lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (p<.0001), higher head AIS scores (p<.0001), and higher mortality (10% vs 6%, p<.0001). Pediatric trauma centers utilized less venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (32% vs 15%, p<.0001), which was evident across all ages 10-19, and had fewer VTE events (p=.001). Adult trauma centers were more likely to perform intracranial pressure monitoring, tracheostomy, long-term enteral access device (LTEAD), and craniotomy (all p<0.0001). Adult trauma centers had shorter median times to tracheostomy and LTEAD. Multivariable logistic regression for tracheostomy and neurosurgical interventions were associated with ATCs, after controlling for severity of TBI and other covariates. Both tracheostomy and neurosurgical interventions were less likely in the uninsured (p<.0001). Discussion: Care for ATPs with severe TBI varies between ATCs and PTCs. Pathways are needed to optimize outcomes for all ATPs with TBI.
{"title":"Differences in Care Practices and Outcomes for Adolescents With Severe TBI: Adult vs Pediatric Trauma Centers.","authors":"Kevin J Lang, Dina M Filiberto, Rachel M Landisch, Regan F Williams, Saskya E Byerly","doi":"10.1177/00031348251358438","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251358438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Adolescent trauma patients (ATPs) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are a population with challenges to standardizing treatment practices and optimizing outcomes. Adult trauma centers (ATCs) and pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) may have different care practices and outcomes for ATPs with severe TBI. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was performed querying the 2020-2022 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, observing treatments and outcomes for ATPs aged 10-19 years old with head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 3-5 and TBI diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed for tracheostomy, neurosurgical interventions, and mortality. <b>Results:</b> 28,527 ATPs were included in the study. 3,744 (13%) and 24,783 (87%) were treated at PTCs and ATCs, respectively. Most patients (73%) were male and had a blunt mechanism (89%). Patients at ATCs had lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (p<.0001), higher head AIS scores (p<.0001), and higher mortality (10% vs 6%, p<.0001). Pediatric trauma centers utilized less venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (32% vs 15%, p<.0001), which was evident across all ages 10-19, and had fewer VTE events (p=.001). Adult trauma centers were more likely to perform intracranial pressure monitoring, tracheostomy, long-term enteral access device (LTEAD), and craniotomy (all p<0.0001). Adult trauma centers had shorter median times to tracheostomy and LTEAD. Multivariable logistic regression for tracheostomy and neurosurgical interventions were associated with ATCs, after controlling for severity of TBI and other covariates. Both tracheostomy and neurosurgical interventions were less likely in the uninsured (p<.0001). <b>Discussion:</b> Care for ATPs with severe TBI varies between ATCs and PTCs. Pathways are needed to optimize outcomes for all ATPs with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144551701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-09DOI: 10.1177/00031348251358435
Song Xu, Ming Xu
ObjectiveTo study the effectiveness of primary sutures after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in treating elderly patients with gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 127 elderly patients with common bile duct stones who were enrolled between January 2019 and December 2023. Based on the suture method of the common bile duct, the patients were divided into the primary suture and T-tube drainage groups. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative recovery rates of the 2 groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThere were 67 and 60 patients in the primary and T-tube drainage groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative data between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, the operation time, postoperative drainage time, first exhaust time, time to get out of bed, hospital stay, and hospital costs in the primary suture group were significantly shorter than those in the T-tube drainage group (P < 0.05). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative liver function, or total postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionLC + LCBDE + primary suture is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones. It may promote recovery, but further research is needed to confirm its superiority over T-tube drainage.
{"title":"Clinical Effect of Primary Suture After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Elderly Patients With Gallbladder Stones and Common Bile Duct Stones.","authors":"Song Xu, Ming Xu","doi":"10.1177/00031348251358435","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251358435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo study the effectiveness of primary sutures after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in treating elderly patients with gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 127 elderly patients with common bile duct stones who were enrolled between January 2019 and December 2023. Based on the suture method of the common bile duct, the patients were divided into the primary suture and T-tube drainage groups. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative recovery rates of the 2 groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThere were 67 and 60 patients in the primary and T-tube drainage groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative data between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Moreover, the operation time, postoperative drainage time, first exhaust time, time to get out of bed, hospital stay, and hospital costs in the primary suture group were significantly shorter than those in the T-tube drainage group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative liver function, or total postoperative complications between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).ConclusionLC + LCBDE + primary suture is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones. It may promote recovery, but further research is needed to confirm its superiority over T-tube drainage.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"201-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144590286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-26DOI: 10.1177/00031348251346546
Gordana Rasic, Andrea Alonso, Loreski Collado, Anand K Devaiah, Tony E Godfrey
BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been proposed as a surrogate for solid tumor tissue biopsies. Our study evaluated trends of clinical trials that assess the role of ctDNA in surgical oncology.MethodsThe ClinicalTrials.gov database was queried for clinical trial that evaluated the use of ctDNA in the management of patients who underwent curative resections for solid tumor malignancies. Studies were categorized based on the phase of operative care were ctDNA was assessed and further stratified based on surgical application. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe trends of included trials.ResultsOf 382,298 clinical trials, our study identified 68 trials (2014-2021). The majority of these trials were phase 2 (82.4%) and actively recruiting (63.2%). The most commonly studied malignancies were breast (20.0%), colon (17.1%) and lung (14.3%) cancers. Majority of trials assessed ctDNA utility in preoperative prognostication (52.9%) and in postoperative adjuvant therapy candidacy (16.2%).DiscussionThere have been significant strides in the use of ctDNA in surgical oncology including preoperative prognostication, postoperative surveillance, and risk stratification for adjuvant therapy. In recognizing the dynamic landscape of clinical trials, multidisciplinary oncology teams can be better informed to anticipate the clinical implications of ctDNA within their practice.
{"title":"Circulating Tumor DNA in the Surgical Management of Cancer: A Review of Clinical Trials to Understand Future Impact on Multidisciplinary Practice.","authors":"Gordana Rasic, Andrea Alonso, Loreski Collado, Anand K Devaiah, Tony E Godfrey","doi":"10.1177/00031348251346546","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251346546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been proposed as a surrogate for solid tumor tissue biopsies. Our study evaluated trends of clinical trials that assess the role of ctDNA in surgical oncology.MethodsThe ClinicalTrials.gov database was queried for clinical trial that evaluated the use of ctDNA in the management of patients who underwent curative resections for solid tumor malignancies. Studies were categorized based on the phase of operative care were ctDNA was assessed and further stratified based on surgical application. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe trends of included trials.ResultsOf 382,298 clinical trials, our study identified 68 trials (2014-2021). The majority of these trials were phase 2 (82.4%) and actively recruiting (63.2%). The most commonly studied malignancies were breast (20.0%), colon (17.1%) and lung (14.3%) cancers. Majority of trials assessed ctDNA utility in preoperative prognostication (52.9%) and in postoperative adjuvant therapy candidacy (16.2%).DiscussionThere have been significant strides in the use of ctDNA in surgical oncology including preoperative prognostication, postoperative surveillance, and risk stratification for adjuvant therapy. In recognizing the dynamic landscape of clinical trials, multidisciplinary oncology teams can be better informed to anticipate the clinical implications of ctDNA within their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"39-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144148854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-05DOI: 10.1177/00031348251385107
Anthony J Duncan, Grayson H Baden, Sandi Zukanovic, Hilla I Sang, Joclyn Seiler Hall
BackgroundColorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States Hesitancy toward colonoscopy and long wait times have led to increased interest in DNA stool-based testing. Access to timely colonoscopy after positive stool-based tests may be challenging, particularly for rural populations. This study aimed to evaluate the timeliness of diagnostic colonoscopies following positive stool-based tests in rural and non-rural patients.MethodsThis was an observational case-control study of patients aged ≥18 years who had a positive DNA-based stool test and underwent diagnostic colonoscopy between January 2018 and December 2023. Participants were classified as rural or non-rural based on Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. The primary outcome was the number of days from a positive stool test to diagnostic colonoscopy. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Pearson's Chi-squared tests.ResultsOf 1316 patients, 668 (50.8%) were from rural areas. The median time to colonoscopy was 35 days for rural patients and 37 days for non-rural patients (P = .6). There was no significant difference in follow-up times. Rural patients were more likely to undergo colonoscopy at an external facility (25% vs 3.1%, P < .001).ConclusionBoth rural and non-rural patients received timely follow-up colonoscopies after positive stool-based tests, indicating that stool-based testing is an effective and accessible method for CRC screening. This supports the continued use of stool-based DNA testing in reducing the burden on health care systems and enhancing screening accessibility for all patients.
在美国,结直肠癌是癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一,结肠镜检查的犹豫和漫长的等待时间导致人们对粪便DNA检测的兴趣增加。在粪便检测呈阳性后,获得及时结肠镜检查可能具有挑战性,特别是对农村人口而言。本研究旨在评估农村和非农村患者粪便检测阳性后诊断性结肠镜检查的及时性。方法:这是一项观察性病例对照研究,患者年龄≥18岁,在2018年1月至2023年12月期间进行了基于dna的粪便检测阳性并进行了诊断性结肠镜检查。根据城乡通勤区(RUCA)代码将参与者分为农村和非农村。主要结果是从粪便试验阳性到结肠镜诊断的天数。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Pearson卡方检验进行统计分析。结果1316例患者中,农村668例(50.8%);农村患者到结肠镜检查的中位时间为35天,非农村患者为37天(P = .6)。随访时间差异无统计学意义。农村患者更有可能在外部机构接受结肠镜检查(25% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001)。结论农村和非农村患者在粪便检查阳性后均能及时随访结肠镜检查,表明粪便检查是一种有效且可及的CRC筛查方法。这支持继续使用基于粪便的DNA检测,以减轻卫生保健系统的负担,并提高对所有患者的筛查可及性。
{"title":"Timely Follow-Up After Positive Stool-Based Testing: Evaluating Diagnostic Colonoscopy Delays in Rural and Non-Rural Populations.","authors":"Anthony J Duncan, Grayson H Baden, Sandi Zukanovic, Hilla I Sang, Joclyn Seiler Hall","doi":"10.1177/00031348251385107","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251385107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundColorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States Hesitancy toward colonoscopy and long wait times have led to increased interest in DNA stool-based testing. Access to timely colonoscopy after positive stool-based tests may be challenging, particularly for rural populations. This study aimed to evaluate the timeliness of diagnostic colonoscopies following positive stool-based tests in rural and non-rural patients.MethodsThis was an observational case-control study of patients aged ≥18 years who had a positive DNA-based stool test and underwent diagnostic colonoscopy between January 2018 and December 2023. Participants were classified as rural or non-rural based on Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. The primary outcome was the number of days from a positive stool test to diagnostic colonoscopy. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Pearson's Chi-squared tests.ResultsOf 1316 patients, 668 (50.8%) were from rural areas. The median time to colonoscopy was 35 days for rural patients and 37 days for non-rural patients (<i>P</i> = .6). There was no significant difference in follow-up times. Rural patients were more likely to undergo colonoscopy at an external facility (25% vs 3.1%, <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionBoth rural and non-rural patients received timely follow-up colonoscopies after positive stool-based tests, indicating that stool-based testing is an effective and accessible method for CRC screening. This supports the continued use of stool-based DNA testing in reducing the burden on health care systems and enhancing screening accessibility for all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"22-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-21DOI: 10.1177/00031348251350993
Caleb Graham, Kelsey Melinosky, Bingchun Wan, Lauren Lym, Jessica McConahey, Heba Zakaria, Thomas Shoultz, Stephen Shang-Yan Luk, Susan Carol Hambrick, Jalen Harvey, Caroline Park
IntroductionTraditionally peritoneal dialysis (PD) is initiated >3 weeks post-placement for tract maturation. The pandemic spurred a need for earlier initiation. We hypothesized that there is no significant difference between outcomes of early start (<2 weeks) vs standard (>2 weeks).MethodsA retrospective review was conducted between 2020 to 2022 at a safety-net hospital and included patients who received a PD catheter ("PDC"). Demographics, technique, dialysate volume, and outcomes were analyzed.Results83 patients met criteria. 47/83 (56.6%) were male, the average age was 49.9 [41-60] years, and average BMI was 30.7 [26-34.6]. Average dialysate volume was 2.13 L (±1.31). There were no significant differences in readmissions, reoperations, or catheter issues between the two groups. Patients with higher BMI and catheter-related issues were more likely to be readmitted (P = 0.0003) and undergo reoperation (P = 0.0021).ConclusionsEarly initiation of PD was not associated with significant differences in complications compared to standard start. Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of early PD initiation.
{"title":"Safety and Feasibility of Early Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis at a Safety-Net Hospital.","authors":"Caleb Graham, Kelsey Melinosky, Bingchun Wan, Lauren Lym, Jessica McConahey, Heba Zakaria, Thomas Shoultz, Stephen Shang-Yan Luk, Susan Carol Hambrick, Jalen Harvey, Caroline Park","doi":"10.1177/00031348251350993","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251350993","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionTraditionally peritoneal dialysis (PD) is initiated >3 weeks post-placement for tract maturation. The pandemic spurred a need for earlier initiation. We hypothesized that there is no significant difference between outcomes of early start (<2 weeks) vs standard (>2 weeks).MethodsA retrospective review was conducted between 2020 to 2022 at a safety-net hospital and included patients who received a PD catheter (\"PDC\"). Demographics, technique, dialysate volume, and outcomes were analyzed.Results83 patients met criteria. 47/83 (56.6%) were male, the average age was 49.9 [41-60] years, and average BMI was 30.7 [26-34.6]. Average dialysate volume was 2.13 L (±1.31). There were no significant differences in readmissions, reoperations, or catheter issues between the two groups. Patients with higher BMI and catheter-related issues were more likely to be readmitted (<i>P</i> = 0.0003) and undergo reoperation (<i>P</i> = 0.0021).ConclusionsEarly initiation of PD was not associated with significant differences in complications compared to standard start. Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of early PD initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144339842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BackgroundRectal cancer (RC) represents approximately one-third of all colorectal cancer, and its incidence has been increasing worldwide. Nectin-4 has demonstrated oncological effects on several human cancers and has attracted attention as a novel therapeutic target molecule. However, the clinical significance and underlying mechanism in RC remain largely unknown.MethodsTo investigate the prognostic impact of Nectin-4 in localized advanced RC, we first evaluated Nectin-4 expression in 135 tissues from patients with Stage II/III RC using immunohistochemistry. Patients were then categorized into 2 groups according to Nectin-4 status. Subsequently, we evaluated the clinical impact of Nectin-4 on oncological outcomes using survival calculations and uni-/multivariate analysis. Furthermore, we performed in-vitro assays to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of Nectin-4 in cell proliferation.ResultsPatients with high Nectin-4 expression exhibited worse postoperative prognosis than those with low (OS: P = 0.002, RFS: P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that Nectin-4 expression was a significant independent prognostic factor in RC (OS: P = 0.002, RFS: P = 0.002). In addition, the Nectin-4 status stratified post-recurrence survival in patients who received chemotherapy for postoperative relapse (P = 0.023). Nectin-4 silencing by siRNA significantly inhibited RC cell proliferation, furthermore, the combination of Nectin-4 silencing and 5-FU resulted in a synergistic antitumor effect.DiscussionWe have showcased the clinical impact and biological value of Nectin-4 in RC. Our findings could provide a guidepost for further clinical trials to establish individualized treatment for RC and act as a key to opening the door to genome-based precision medicine.
直肠癌(RC)约占所有结直肠癌的三分之一,其发病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势。Nectin-4已被证实对多种人类癌症具有肿瘤作用,并作为一种新的治疗靶分子而受到关注。然而,在RC的临床意义和潜在的机制仍然很大程度上是未知的。方法为了研究Nectin-4在局部晚期RC中的预后影响,我们首先使用免疫组织化学方法评估了135例II/III期RC患者组织中Nectin-4的表达。然后根据Nectin-4状态将患者分为两组。随后,我们使用生存计算和单/多变量分析评估了Nectin-4对肿瘤预后的临床影响。此外,我们进行了体外实验来阐明Nectin-4在细胞增殖中的潜在机制。结果Nectin-4高表达患者术后预后较低表达患者差(OS: P = 0.002, RFS: P = 0.002)。多因素分析显示,Nectin-4表达是RC中重要的独立预后因素(OS: P = 0.002, RFS: P = 0.002)。此外,在术后复发接受化疗的患者中,Nectin-4状态对复发后生存率进行分层(P = 0.023)。通过siRNA沉默Nectin-4可显著抑制RC细胞的增殖,并且,沉默Nectin-4与5-FU联合可产生协同抗肿瘤作用。我们已经展示了Nectin-4在RC中的临床影响和生物学价值。我们的研究结果可以为进一步的临床试验提供指导,以建立针对RC的个体化治疗,并作为打开基因组精准医学大门的钥匙。
{"title":"Nectin-4 Tumor Expression as a Prognostic Factor and Potential Therapeutic Target in Stage II/III Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Takeshi Takei, Satoshi Nishiwada, Fumikazu Koyama, Hiroyuki Kuge, Yosuke Iwasa, Tadataka Takagi, Kosuke Fujimoto, Takashi Tamura, Masayuki Sho","doi":"10.1177/00031348251354854","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251354854","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRectal cancer (RC) represents approximately one-third of all colorectal cancer, and its incidence has been increasing worldwide. Nectin-4 has demonstrated oncological effects on several human cancers and has attracted attention as a novel therapeutic target molecule. However, the clinical significance and underlying mechanism in RC remain largely unknown.MethodsTo investigate the prognostic impact of Nectin-4 in localized advanced RC, we first evaluated Nectin-4 expression in 135 tissues from patients with Stage II/III RC using immunohistochemistry. Patients were then categorized into 2 groups according to Nectin-4 status. Subsequently, we evaluated the clinical impact of Nectin-4 on oncological outcomes using survival calculations and uni-/multivariate analysis. Furthermore, we performed in-vitro assays to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of Nectin-4 in cell proliferation.ResultsPatients with high Nectin-4 expression exhibited worse postoperative prognosis than those with low (OS: <i>P</i> = 0.002, RFS: <i>P</i> = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that Nectin-4 expression was a significant independent prognostic factor in RC (OS: <i>P</i> = 0.002, RFS: <i>P</i> = 0.002). In addition, the Nectin-4 status stratified post-recurrence survival in patients who received chemotherapy for postoperative relapse (<i>P</i> = 0.023). Nectin-4 silencing by siRNA significantly inhibited RC cell proliferation, furthermore, the combination of Nectin-4 silencing and 5-FU resulted in a synergistic antitumor effect.DiscussionWe have showcased the clinical impact and biological value of Nectin-4 in RC. Our findings could provide a guidepost for further clinical trials to establish individualized treatment for RC and act as a key to opening the door to genome-based precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"82-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144339840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-27DOI: 10.1177/00031348251363515
Jiabao Nie, Areg Grigorian, Negaar Aryan, Nicholas Truong, Catherine Kuza, Sigrid Burrus, Jeffry Nahmias
BackgroundOlder adult (OA) abuse affects the health and welfare of people ages 65 and older. Although previous research has shown that OA abuse impacts their well-being, there is limited understanding of the injury profiles and outcomes for OAs with or without reported abuse. This study compared OAs who reported abuse ((+)RA) to those who did not ((-)RA), hypothesizing OAs with (+)RA have increased mortality.MethodsThe 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) was queried for all OAs ages 65 and older. The primary outcome was mortality. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare OAs with (+)RA and (-)RA. Separate multivariable analyses were performed to determine if (+)RA was associated with risk of complications or mortality.ResultsOut of 937 465 OAs, 1552 (0.2%) had (+)RA. OAs with (+)RA had increased rates of gunshot wounds (5.7% vs 0.7%, P < .001) and stab wounds (1.9% vs 0.4%, P < .001) compared to (-)RA patients. (+)RA patients also had increased mortality (6.7% vs 4.2%, P < .001), hospital LOS (5 vs 5, P < .001), and more often underwent surgical interventions (19.0% vs 14.3%, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, OAs with (+)RA had an increased associated risk of complications (OR 1.41, CI 1.16-1.71, P < .001) and mortality (OR 1.35, CI 1.06-1.70, P = .012) compared to OAs with (-)RA.DiscussionThis national analysis demonstrated that OAs with (+)RA had increased rates of penetrating trauma, surgical interventions, ventilator days, and death compared to (-)RA patients. Future prospective studies are needed to ascertain if primary prevention efforts can mitigate the increased morbidity and mortality seen in this vulnerable population.
背景虐待老年人影响65岁及以上老年人的健康和福利。虽然以前的研究表明OA滥用会影响他们的健康,但对OA的伤害概况和结果的了解有限,无论是否报告虐待。本研究比较了报告滥用(+)类风湿性关节炎的oa与未报告滥用(-)类风湿性关节炎的oa,假设(+)类风湿性关节炎的oa死亡率增加。方法对所有65岁及以上的oa患者进行2017-2019年创伤质量改善计划(TQIP)查询。主要结局是死亡率。采用双变量分析比较oa与(+)RA和(-)RA。进行单独的多变量分析以确定(+)RA是否与并发症或死亡率风险相关。结果937465例OAs中,1552例(0.2%)有(+)RA。与(-)RA患者相比,(+)RA的oa患者枪伤(5.7% vs 0.7%, P < 0.001)和刺伤(1.9% vs 0.4%, P < 0.001)的发生率增加。(+)RA患者的死亡率(6.7% vs 4.2%, P < .001)、医院LOS (5 vs 5, P < .001)和更频繁地接受手术干预(19.0% vs 14.3%, P < .001)。在多变量分析中,与(-)RA的OAs相比,(+)RA的OAs并发症的相关风险(OR 1.41, CI 1.16-1.71, P < 0.001)和死亡率(OR 1.35, CI 1.06-1.70, P = 0.012)增加。这一全国性分析表明,与(+)类RA患者相比,(+)类RA患者的穿透性创伤、手术干预、呼吸机天数和死亡率都有所增加。未来的前瞻性研究需要确定初级预防工作是否可以减轻这一脆弱人群中发病率和死亡率的增加。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Profiles and Outcomes for Elderly Patients with or without Reported Abuse.","authors":"Jiabao Nie, Areg Grigorian, Negaar Aryan, Nicholas Truong, Catherine Kuza, Sigrid Burrus, Jeffry Nahmias","doi":"10.1177/00031348251363515","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251363515","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOlder adult (OA) abuse affects the health and welfare of people ages 65 and older. Although previous research has shown that OA abuse impacts their well-being, there is limited understanding of the injury profiles and outcomes for OAs with or without reported abuse. This study compared OAs who reported abuse ((+)RA) to those who did not ((-)RA), hypothesizing OAs with (+)RA have increased mortality.MethodsThe 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) was queried for all OAs ages 65 and older. The primary outcome was mortality. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare OAs with (+)RA and (-)RA. Separate multivariable analyses were performed to determine if (+)RA was associated with risk of complications or mortality.ResultsOut of 937 465 OAs, 1552 (0.2%) had (+)RA. OAs with (+)RA had increased rates of gunshot wounds (5.7% vs 0.7%, <i>P</i> < .001) and stab wounds (1.9% vs 0.4%, <i>P</i> < .001) compared to (-)RA patients. (+)RA patients also had increased mortality (6.7% vs 4.2%, <i>P</i> < .001), hospital LOS (5 vs 5, <i>P</i> < .001), and more often underwent surgical interventions (19.0% vs 14.3%, <i>P</i> < .001). On multivariable analysis, OAs with (+)RA had an increased associated risk of complications (OR 1.41, CI 1.16-1.71, <i>P</i> < .001) and mortality (OR 1.35, CI 1.06-1.70, <i>P</i> = .012) compared to OAs with (-)RA.DiscussionThis national analysis demonstrated that OAs with (+)RA had increased rates of penetrating trauma, surgical interventions, ventilator days, and death compared to (-)RA patients. Future prospective studies are needed to ascertain if primary prevention efforts can mitigate the increased morbidity and mortality seen in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"231-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144726495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-24DOI: 10.1177/00031348251371212
Hongnan Ye
{"title":"Letter re: Enhancing Surgical Education Through Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Digital Surgery.","authors":"Hongnan Ye","doi":"10.1177/00031348251371212","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251371212","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-17DOI: 10.1177/00031348251358443
Muhammad Nadeem Ahmad, Zahra Fatima Rahmatullah, Muhammad Masood Alam, Fatima Bhojani, Mallick Muhammad Zohaib Uddin, Shahzeb Ali, Naila Nadeem, Muhammad Salman Khan, Uffan Zafar
PurposeBomb blast injuries in non-combat settings have seen a surge in the last two to three decades. Third-world countries like Pakistan have been at the receiving end of these attacks. However, the extent of the damage inflicted in these regions is not fully understood due to gross underreporting. We aim to assist radiologists in identifying common abdominopelvic injuries in bomb blast victims and highlighting specific injury patterns to guide more effective management.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study designed to analyze abdominopelvic injuries among bomb blast victims treated at our institution. Data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic health records and included demographic information (age and sex), injury classification, imaging results, treatment received, and clinical outcomes.ResultsChi-square and t-tests showed no statistically significant difference in the gender or mean age distribution between patients who underwent abdominopelvic surgery and those who did not. The most common single injury category among the patients analyzed was secondary injury, while the most common combination of injuries observed was a combination of secondary and tertiary injuries. CT was the most frequently requested first-line radiological investigation, while US was most frequently requested as a second-line modality. Injuries to the liver were the most frequently observed solid-organ injury.ConclusionEfficient practices are essential in radiology departments to manage the surge in patient numbers seen after bomb blast incidents. Our study emphasizes the role of radiology scans and details the types of abdominopelvic injury patterns observed in bomb blast victims.
{"title":"Approach and Management of Multiple Victims of Civilian Bombing Events With Abdominopelvic Injuries: A 20-Year Institutional Experience in Pakistan.","authors":"Muhammad Nadeem Ahmad, Zahra Fatima Rahmatullah, Muhammad Masood Alam, Fatima Bhojani, Mallick Muhammad Zohaib Uddin, Shahzeb Ali, Naila Nadeem, Muhammad Salman Khan, Uffan Zafar","doi":"10.1177/00031348251358443","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00031348251358443","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeBomb blast injuries in non-combat settings have seen a surge in the last two to three decades. Third-world countries like Pakistan have been at the receiving end of these attacks. However, the extent of the damage inflicted in these regions is not fully understood due to gross underreporting. We aim to assist radiologists in identifying common abdominopelvic injuries in bomb blast victims and highlighting specific injury patterns to guide more effective management.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study designed to analyze abdominopelvic injuries among bomb blast victims treated at our institution. Data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic health records and included demographic information (age and sex), injury classification, imaging results, treatment received, and clinical outcomes.ResultsChi-square and t-tests showed no statistically significant difference in the gender or mean age distribution between patients who underwent abdominopelvic surgery and those who did not. The most common single injury category among the patients analyzed was secondary injury, while the most common combination of injuries observed was a combination of secondary and tertiary injuries. CT was the most frequently requested first-line radiological investigation, while US was most frequently requested as a second-line modality. Injuries to the liver were the most frequently observed solid-organ injury.ConclusionEfficient practices are essential in radiology departments to manage the surge in patient numbers seen after bomb blast incidents. Our study emphasizes the role of radiology scans and details the types of abdominopelvic injury patterns observed in bomb blast victims.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"246-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144648349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}