Annales de biologie clinique最新文献

Nutritional status is an important protection factor against viral infections. Both undernutrition and malnutrition cause deficits in micronutrients, trace elements and vitamins necessary for various physiological functions and the appropriate functioning of the immune system. These deficiencies and infectious diseases often coexist, with complex interactions. An assessment of the micro-nutrient nutritional status of Covid-19 patients has not been at the center of priorities and recommendations, due to both the medical emergency and the absence of direct evidence and rapid effects of supplementation. Few recommendations have come from learned societies due to the lack of significant evidence of the effects of supplementation in positive patients and a need for robust studies. Essential trace elements and vitamins are necessary for the differentiation, activation and execution of many functions of immune cells, but their specific role has yet to be defined. This review article discusses in the context of Covid-19 the importance of micronutrients (selenium, copper, zinc, vitamins C, D, A and those of group B) in the host to tend towards an optimization of the immune response to infections. A nutritional balance remains the key word for achieving micronutrient homeostasis. Attention had to be paid to micronutrients in primary prevention, in the general population, in order to reduce the risk of impaired nutritional status in case of major health situations.

Introduction: Hematological disorders are the third cause of hypereosinophilia, after allergic and parasitic disease. The objective of our study is to show the epidemiological, clinical, biological and therapeutic characteristics of hematological hypereosinophilia.

Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study over a 4-year period (March 2017-March 2021) concerning 14 patients with hematological hypereosinophilia.

Results: Fourteen patients were included (9 women and 5 men). The median age at diagnosis was 55 years. Hematological hypereosinophilia was mainly of clonal etiology. Clinical manifestations were either specific to hypereosinophilia, such as organ damage, or related to the etiology of hypereosinophilia, such as hepato-splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. Moderate and severe forms were the most commonly reported. Several other quantitative and qualitative abnormalities of the blood picture were reported. Identification of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene by molecular biology (RT-PCR) was positive in two patients. Imatinib was the main treatment for clonal forms.

Conclusion: Hematological hypereosinophilia is a rare and complex pathology. Our study has confirmed this epidemiological, clinical, biological and therapeutic heterogeneity and has enabled us to realize the contribution of molecular biology in the diagnosis and the treatment of hypereosinophilia.

The French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC) set up a working group “Biochemical markers of Covid-19” whose main objective is to review, analyse and monitor biological prescriptions according to the patient’s care path. This study covers all public and private sectors of medical biology in metropolitan France and overseas and extends to the French-speaking world. We present a summary of feedbacks after 2 years of the pandemic. At the early stage of Covid-19, with regard to the regions surveyed, a common symptomatology with local zoonosis (dengue fever, zika, malaria, leptospirosis, etc.) complicates the diagnosis of Covid-19. At a more advanced stage, it is a question of managing an influx of patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome. In this case, the biology is then simpler and delocalized medical biology devices have proven their effectiveness. As a result, ICU clinicians can better manage the frequent comorbidities encountered in these regions: obesity, diabetes, chronic renal failure, cardiovascular diseases.

An adolescent girl consults a physician for abdominal pain attacks occurring regularly for 2 years. After eliminating gastroenterologic or gynecologic causes, an acute hepatic porphyria is suspected. The pink color of her urine seems consistent with the suspicion of porphyria; however, the urinary profile of porphyrins and its precursors is normal.

Background: To prevent the crisis-level shortage of beds in hospitals and for a more efficient support, it’s necessary to early identify coronavirus disease-19 (Covid-19) patients at risk to develop a severe form of the disease.

Objective: The goal of our study was to determine whether biological markers, including the serum ferritin, could predict the severity of the Covid-19.

Methods: One hundred and seventy-one patients, who were admitted to Caen University Hospital, were included retrospectively with a positive diagnosis of Covid-19 by RT-PCR. A serum ferritin measurement was performed for all patients. They were further classified either into a non-severe or a severe group based on their hospitalization in intense care unit (ICU) for mechanical ventilation or death.

Results: Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between increased serum ferritin and CRP levels, obesity, CT scan lesions, pathological respiratory rate, decreased PaO2/FiO2 ratio, the NEWS-2 score and the severe (n = 59) vs the non-severe (n = 112) outcome of Covid-19 patients. However, in a multivariate analysis, only CRP and obesity were associated with the severe form of Covid-19.

Conclusion: While pathological level of serum ferritin at admission is associated with severe form of Covid-19, combination of increased CRP level and obesity would better predict the severity of the disease.

Multiparametric toxicology research is mainly based on immunochromatography [IC] and chromatography methods. A new automated method using an immunoenzymatic (IE) assay based on a biochip array technology combines short turning around time and analytical performances close to chromatography in terms of positivity cut-off. The aim of our study was to compare IE versus IC and chromatography methods using urines samples from clinical cases. Seventy-two samples were analyzed by IC (amphetamines, opiates, benzodiazepines, THC, methadone, cocaine), IE and chromatography (previous classes plus opioids and cathinone). Immunochromatography results were read by at least 7 operators to assess reading subjectivity. Immunoenzymatic, IC, and chromatrography results were compared with each other. Chromatographic quantification was analyzed to understand discrepancies. Significant discrepancies (29-64%) were observed between IC and IE for most of the drug families investigated except for benzodiazepines, methadone and opiates. These discrepancies were not identified between IE and chromatography, except for some substances (28% to 67% discrepancies for buprenorphine, tramadol and oxycodone, 100% for cathinone). In contrast to IC, the performance of IE approached those of chromatography, except for some substances for which cross-reactions must be investigated. Reading discrepancies were frequent with IC (33% of samples) and made robust result output challenging. In conclusion, the Multistat® is an interesting method for first-line toxicological screening for laboratories without chromatography method.

A 14-year-old patient underwent liver transplant. Three months after transplantation, EBV associated lymphoma was suspected. EBV serologies before and after transplantation were particularly discrepant. Eighteen months before transplantation, the serological profile suggested a recent EBV primary-infection, four months before transplantation, we had isolated anti-EBNA IgG and five days after transplantation, the serological profile suggested a past infection. All EBV PCR performed on whole blood were negative. Retrospectively, immunoblots anti-EBV IgG were performed. Blots showed no anti-EBV IgG before and until the day of liver transplantation. Five days after transplantation, slight bands of both IgG anti-p18 (VCA) and anti-EBNA-1 were found, without any other serological marker. These were probably due to passive transfers of IgG during surgery. There was therefore no argument for an immunization against EBV before or after liver transplant for this patient.