Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005249
Caroline L Ensor, Johnathan L Pregler, Amr Abouleish, Neal H Cohen, Thomas R Miller, Jonathan S Gal
{"title":"Highlighting Variability in Medicare Payments for Anesthesia Units: Rural Pass-through versus Medicare Anesthesia Conversion Factor.","authors":"Caroline L Ensor, Johnathan L Pregler, Amr Abouleish, Neal H Cohen, Thomas R Miller, Jonathan S Gal","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005249","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005249","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"142 1","pages":"238-240"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142799145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005248
Jessica R Ansari, Daniel J Conti, Guillermina Michel, Alla Yarmosh, Naida M Cole, Steven L Shafer
Background: Few studies have assessed the dose ratio of calcium gluconate to calcium chloride or defined the time course of change in serum ionized calcium concentration after intravenous injection.
Methods: In a bioequivalence (dose ratio) trial, parturients undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive calcium chloride (0.5 g) or calcium gluconate (1.5 or 2 g) by 10-min intravenous infusion. Venous serum ionized calcium concentration was measured before calcium infusion and approximately 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min after infusion start. These data were combined with serum ionized calcium concentration measurements in parturients who received 1 g calcium chloride or saline placebo in two recent clinical trials to define the pharmacokinetics of intravenous calcium over the first hour during and after drug administration.
Results: The bioequivalence study enrolled 34 participants, from whom were collected 181 serum ionized calcium concentration measurements. The dose ratio of calcium gluconate to calcium chloride was 3.11 (95% CI, 2.77 to 3.48). Population pharmacokinetics of calcium were determined using 311 serum ionized calcium concentration measurements from 70 parturients. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous calcium were described by a two-compartment model with systemic clearance of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.27) l/min, distributional clearance of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.56) l/min, central volume of 10.9 (95% CI, 9.3 to 12.6) l, and peripheral volume of 16.5 (95% CI, 12.5 to 24.7) l. After adjusting for the dose ratio, calcium gluconate and calcium chloride had identical time courses. A 1-g infusion of calcium chloride resulted in a peak increase in serum ionized calcium concentration of 0.39 (0.38 to 0.42 mM), which decreased by half (29 [23 to 40] min) after initiation of the 10-min infusion.
Conclusions: This study confirmed a 3:1 dose ratio of calcium gluconate to calcium chloride and estimated the pharmacokinetics over the first hour after intravenous delivery. These data inform clinical care and may guide future trials assessing calcium efficacy to reduce bleeding in obstetric patients.
{"title":"Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Calcium during Cesarean Delivery.","authors":"Jessica R Ansari, Daniel J Conti, Guillermina Michel, Alla Yarmosh, Naida M Cole, Steven L Shafer","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005248","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005248","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have assessed the dose ratio of calcium gluconate to calcium chloride or defined the time course of change in serum ionized calcium concentration after intravenous injection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a bioequivalence (dose ratio) trial, parturients undergoing cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive calcium chloride (0.5 g) or calcium gluconate (1.5 or 2 g) by 10-min intravenous infusion. Venous serum ionized calcium concentration was measured before calcium infusion and approximately 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min after infusion start. These data were combined with serum ionized calcium concentration measurements in parturients who received 1 g calcium chloride or saline placebo in two recent clinical trials to define the pharmacokinetics of intravenous calcium over the first hour during and after drug administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bioequivalence study enrolled 34 participants, from whom were collected 181 serum ionized calcium concentration measurements. The dose ratio of calcium gluconate to calcium chloride was 3.11 (95% CI, 2.77 to 3.48). Population pharmacokinetics of calcium were determined using 311 serum ionized calcium concentration measurements from 70 parturients. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous calcium were described by a two-compartment model with systemic clearance of 0.18 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.27) l/min, distributional clearance of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.56) l/min, central volume of 10.9 (95% CI, 9.3 to 12.6) l, and peripheral volume of 16.5 (95% CI, 12.5 to 24.7) l. After adjusting for the dose ratio, calcium gluconate and calcium chloride had identical time courses. A 1-g infusion of calcium chloride resulted in a peak increase in serum ionized calcium concentration of 0.39 (0.38 to 0.42 mM), which decreased by half (29 [23 to 40] min) after initiation of the 10-min infusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed a 3:1 dose ratio of calcium gluconate to calcium chloride and estimated the pharmacokinetics over the first hour after intravenous delivery. These data inform clinical care and may guide future trials assessing calcium efficacy to reduce bleeding in obstetric patients.</p><p><strong>Editor’s perspective: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"121-131"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142370796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: A brachial plexus block plays an important role in providing perioperative analgesia for shoulder surgery; however, the inherent risk of phrenic nerve block and resulting hemidiaphragmatic paralysis may limit its use in patients with compromised pulmonary function. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, maximum tolerated volume, and optimal biologic volume of 0.5% ropivacaine used in a single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Methods: In this seamless single-arm exploratory phase I/II trial, a novel Bayesian optimal interval design was used to guide volume escalation for determination of the maximum tolerated volume, followed by sequential volume expansion using Bayesian optimal phase 2 design to establish the optimal biologic volume. Fifty-four patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery received a single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.5% ropivacaine ranging from 15 to 40 ml. The primary outcomes were complete or partial hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in phase I, measured using ultrasound 30 min after block completion, and the block success in phase II, defined as achieving a total sensorimotor score 12 points or greater and the total sensory score 3 points or greater, measured through manual sensorimotor testing.
Results: The maximum tolerated volume for the single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block was determined to be 35 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine, with a hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate of 0.09 (95% credible interval, 0 to 0.29). The optimal biologic volume was found to be 25 ml, with a block success rate of 1.0 (95% credible interval, 0.95 to 1.0) and a negligible hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate of 0.01 (95% credible interval, 0 to 0.06).
Conclusions: A single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block using 25 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine produced consistent block success with a minimal hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate, suggesting the need for further studies to confirm this result in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
{"title":"Determination of the Optimal Volume of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Single-injection Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Phase I/II Trial.","authors":"Hongye Zhang, Jinyu Wu, Yongsheng Miao, Ying Yuan, Zongyang Qu, Yaonan Zhang, Zhen Hua","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005159","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A brachial plexus block plays an important role in providing perioperative analgesia for shoulder surgery; however, the inherent risk of phrenic nerve block and resulting hemidiaphragmatic paralysis may limit its use in patients with compromised pulmonary function. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, maximum tolerated volume, and optimal biologic volume of 0.5% ropivacaine used in a single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this seamless single-arm exploratory phase I/II trial, a novel Bayesian optimal interval design was used to guide volume escalation for determination of the maximum tolerated volume, followed by sequential volume expansion using Bayesian optimal phase 2 design to establish the optimal biologic volume. Fifty-four patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery received a single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.5% ropivacaine ranging from 15 to 40 ml. The primary outcomes were complete or partial hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in phase I, measured using ultrasound 30 min after block completion, and the block success in phase II, defined as achieving a total sensorimotor score 12 points or greater and the total sensory score 3 points or greater, measured through manual sensorimotor testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum tolerated volume for the single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block was determined to be 35 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine, with a hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate of 0.09 (95% credible interval, 0 to 0.29). The optimal biologic volume was found to be 25 ml, with a block success rate of 1.0 (95% credible interval, 0.95 to 1.0) and a negligible hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate of 0.01 (95% credible interval, 0 to 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block using 25 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine produced consistent block success with a minimal hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate, suggesting the need for further studies to confirm this result in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Editor’s perspective: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"155-165"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141632444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005172
Frederick Sieber, Daniel I McIsaac, Stacie Deiner, Tangwan Azefor, Miles Berger, Christopher Hughes, Jacqueline M Leung, John Maldon, Julie R McSwain, Mark D Neuman, Marcia M Russell, Victoria Tang, Elizabeth Whitlock, Robert Whittington, Anne M Marbella, Madhulika Agarkar, Stephanie Ramirez, Alexandre Dyer, Jaime Friel Blanck, Stacey Uhl, Mark D Grant, Karen B Domino
{"title":"2025 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Advisory for Perioperative Care of Older Adults Scheduled for Inpatient Surgery.","authors":"Frederick Sieber, Daniel I McIsaac, Stacie Deiner, Tangwan Azefor, Miles Berger, Christopher Hughes, Jacqueline M Leung, John Maldon, Julie R McSwain, Mark D Neuman, Marcia M Russell, Victoria Tang, Elizabeth Whitlock, Robert Whittington, Anne M Marbella, Madhulika Agarkar, Stephanie Ramirez, Alexandre Dyer, Jaime Friel Blanck, Stacey Uhl, Mark D Grant, Karen B Domino","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005172","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005172","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"142 1","pages":"22-51"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142799142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005354
Qirui Zhang,Xuyang Ye,Shuqing Shi,Songhua Zhou,Daqing Ma,Wen Ouyang,Jianbin Tong,Yuan Le
BACKGROUNDPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Pyridoxine has been recommended as a first-line drug to prevent and treat nausea and vomiting during pregnancy; however, its efficacy in preventing PONV remains unclear.METHODSPatients of 18 to 65 years old, who received elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into either the pyridoxine or control group. The pyridoxine group received 0.2g vitamin B6 before anesthesia induction, and the control group received normal saline intravenously. Both groups received a similar regimen of combined intravenous and inhalation general anesthesia. All patients received dexamethasone(intravenous) after anesthesia induction and ondansetron(intravenous) before surgery completion. PONV occurrence was recorded according to the patients' self-reported data. Other clinical data were collected from hospital system, and concentrations of blood interleukin-6 and substance P were measured by ELISA.RESULTSA total of 442 patients were screened and 240 patients were equally randomized to the pyridoxine or control group. The incidence of PONV was statistically significant lower in the pyridoxine group than in the control group (16.7% [20/120] vs. 35.8% [43/120]; relative risk (RR) = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.29, 0.74]; absolute risk reduction (ARR) = 0.20 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.30]; P = 0.001), and pyridoxine decreased the incidence of postoperative nausea (12.5% [15/120] vs. 35% [42/120]; RR = 0.36 [95% CI: 0.21, 0.61]; ARR = 0.23 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.33]; P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in postoperative vomiting, time to the first PONV occurrence, pain, serum interleukin-6 and substance P, and white blood cell and neutrophil counts.CONCLUSIONIn this single center randomized trial, pyridoxine plus dexamethasone and ondansetron reduced the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. These findings need to be validated in multicenter studies in diverse populations to ensure generalizability.
{"title":"Pyridoxine Prevents Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Qirui Zhang,Xuyang Ye,Shuqing Shi,Songhua Zhou,Daqing Ma,Wen Ouyang,Jianbin Tong,Yuan Le","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005354","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Pyridoxine has been recommended as a first-line drug to prevent and treat nausea and vomiting during pregnancy; however, its efficacy in preventing PONV remains unclear.METHODSPatients of 18 to 65 years old, who received elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into either the pyridoxine or control group. The pyridoxine group received 0.2g vitamin B6 before anesthesia induction, and the control group received normal saline intravenously. Both groups received a similar regimen of combined intravenous and inhalation general anesthesia. All patients received dexamethasone(intravenous) after anesthesia induction and ondansetron(intravenous) before surgery completion. PONV occurrence was recorded according to the patients' self-reported data. Other clinical data were collected from hospital system, and concentrations of blood interleukin-6 and substance P were measured by ELISA.RESULTSA total of 442 patients were screened and 240 patients were equally randomized to the pyridoxine or control group. The incidence of PONV was statistically significant lower in the pyridoxine group than in the control group (16.7% [20/120] vs. 35.8% [43/120]; relative risk (RR) = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.29, 0.74]; absolute risk reduction (ARR) = 0.20 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.30]; P = 0.001), and pyridoxine decreased the incidence of postoperative nausea (12.5% [15/120] vs. 35% [42/120]; RR = 0.36 [95% CI: 0.21, 0.61]; ARR = 0.23 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.33]; P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in postoperative vomiting, time to the first PONV occurrence, pain, serum interleukin-6 and substance P, and white blood cell and neutrophil counts.CONCLUSIONIn this single center randomized trial, pyridoxine plus dexamethasone and ondansetron reduced the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. These findings need to be validated in multicenter studies in diverse populations to ensure generalizability.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142887733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-26DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005351
Stefan Salzmann,Laura Kikker,Ellen Tosberg,Noah Becker,Markus Spies,Frank Euteneuer,Dirk Rüsch
BACKGROUNDPreoperative anxiety is common and most patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support to cope with their anxiety. Studies examining the effectiveness of information to reduce anxiety have been inconsistent. In addition, it is unclear whether results reported to be statistically significant are also clinically relevant. This study's primary objective was to test the hypothesis that a personalized and information-based intervention would reduce anesthesia-related anxiety.METHODSIn this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 122 adults awaiting elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive a personalized and information-based intervention in addition to standard preanesthetic consultation (intervention group) or standard preanesthetic consultation (control group) the day before surgery. Anxiety was assessed at two time points before and at four time points after randomization until induction of anesthesia to state their anxiety level using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (two items each for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, each item's score range: 1-5). Constrained linear mixed models were used to analyze the intervention effects. Patients' subjective changes in anxiety (reduced vs. not reduced) and associated numeric scores were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference.RESULTSThe intervention led to reduced anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety in the intervention group compared to the control group after randomization (indicated by significant two-way interactions for anesthesia-related anxiety (F(5, 96.291) = 7.449, p<.001) and surgery-related anxiety (F(5, 112.486) = 5.466, p<.001)). The minimal clinically important difference in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety scores was 1.03 and 1.13 points for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, respectively.CONCLUSIONSA personalized and information-based intervention can reduce anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety to a statistically significant and clinically relevant degree. Future studies should include an active control group to evaluate this intervention's specific effects which may be helpful only in patients seeking anxiety-reducing interventions.
{"title":"Impact of a personalized intervention on preoperative anxiety and determination of the minimal clinically important difference in anxiety levels - a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Stefan Salzmann,Laura Kikker,Ellen Tosberg,Noah Becker,Markus Spies,Frank Euteneuer,Dirk Rüsch","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005351","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDPreoperative anxiety is common and most patients experiencing preoperative anxiety would welcome support to cope with their anxiety. Studies examining the effectiveness of information to reduce anxiety have been inconsistent. In addition, it is unclear whether results reported to be statistically significant are also clinically relevant. This study's primary objective was to test the hypothesis that a personalized and information-based intervention would reduce anesthesia-related anxiety.METHODSIn this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 122 adults awaiting elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive a personalized and information-based intervention in addition to standard preanesthetic consultation (intervention group) or standard preanesthetic consultation (control group) the day before surgery. Anxiety was assessed at two time points before and at four time points after randomization until induction of anesthesia to state their anxiety level using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (two items each for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, each item's score range: 1-5). Constrained linear mixed models were used to analyze the intervention effects. Patients' subjective changes in anxiety (reduced vs. not reduced) and associated numeric scores were used to determine the minimal clinically important difference.RESULTSThe intervention led to reduced anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety in the intervention group compared to the control group after randomization (indicated by significant two-way interactions for anesthesia-related anxiety (F(5, 96.291) = 7.449, p<.001) and surgery-related anxiety (F(5, 112.486) = 5.466, p<.001)). The minimal clinically important difference in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale anxiety scores was 1.03 and 1.13 points for anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety, respectively.CONCLUSIONSA personalized and information-based intervention can reduce anesthesia- and surgery-related anxiety to a statistically significant and clinically relevant degree. Future studies should include an active control group to evaluate this intervention's specific effects which may be helpful only in patients seeking anxiety-reducing interventions.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142887739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005324
David P Obert, Gwi H Park, Kaitlyn Strong, David Schreier, Elizabeth Korn, Carla Troyas, Kathleen F Vincent, Ken Solt
Background: Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is widely used in anesthesiology, but its illicit use is rapidly increasing. At high doses fentanyl induces unconsciousness and muscle rigidity, the mechanisms of which are poorly understood. Since animal models are needed to study these effects, the aim of this study was to establish a rat model of fentanyl abuse and investigate the effects of repeated high-dose fentanyl injections on loss of righting reflex, heart rate, respiratory depression, muscle, and brain activity.
Methods: Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were studied (n=40). A bolus of 100µg/kg fentanyl was administered intravenously twice a week for five consecutive weeks. Time to return of righting reflex (RORR) after fentanyl injection and changes in EMG/EEG activity as well as heart rate were analyzed. Additionally, arterial blood gas analysis for evaluation of ventilation was performed. Mixed-effect models with Dunnet's test and effect sizes were used for statistical analysis.
Results: Repeated injections resulted in a U-shaped change in time to RORR with the longest latency after the first exposure (median: 50[1st-3rd quartile:36-56]min) and the shortest after the fifth exposure (16[13-33]min). Following fentanyl administration, heart rate dropped immediately by 225[95%CI: 179, 271]bpm (F=3952.16, p<.001), while EMG activity increased by 291[95%CI: 212, 370]% (F=27.51, p<0.001) and PaCO2 inclined by 49.4[95%CI: 40.6, 58.2]mmHg (F=75.97, p<0.001) within 5 minutes after injection. Additionally, pH decreased by 0.48[95%CI: 0.41, 0.54] (F=142.00, p<0.01), and PaO2 decreased by 50.4[40.8, 60.0]mmHg (F=57.90, p<0.001). Repeated fentanyl exposures did not significantly affect the extent of these changes (EMG: F=1.63, p=0.237; PaCO2: F=1.23, p=0.312; HR: F=1.05, p=0.400; pH: F=3.05, p=0.066; pO2: F=3.35, p=0.052). EEG analysis revealed that repeated fentanyl exposures elicited significantly higher absolute power in frequencies >20Hz as indicated by an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve >0.7.
Conclusion: We established a rodent model of repeated, high-dose fentanyl administration. Overall, significant evidence of tolerance was not observed after ten exposures of high-dose fentanyl for any of the analyzed parameters. These results suggest that tolerance does not develop for fentanyl-induced unconsciousness, muscle rigidity, or respiratory depression.
{"title":"Repeated, High-dose Fentanyl Administration in Rats Reveals Minimal Tolerance to Unconsciousness, Bradycardia, Muscle Rigidity and Respiratory Depression.","authors":"David P Obert, Gwi H Park, Kaitlyn Strong, David Schreier, Elizabeth Korn, Carla Troyas, Kathleen F Vincent, Ken Solt","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005324","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is widely used in anesthesiology, but its illicit use is rapidly increasing. At high doses fentanyl induces unconsciousness and muscle rigidity, the mechanisms of which are poorly understood. Since animal models are needed to study these effects, the aim of this study was to establish a rat model of fentanyl abuse and investigate the effects of repeated high-dose fentanyl injections on loss of righting reflex, heart rate, respiratory depression, muscle, and brain activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were studied (n=40). A bolus of 100µg/kg fentanyl was administered intravenously twice a week for five consecutive weeks. Time to return of righting reflex (RORR) after fentanyl injection and changes in EMG/EEG activity as well as heart rate were analyzed. Additionally, arterial blood gas analysis for evaluation of ventilation was performed. Mixed-effect models with Dunnet's test and effect sizes were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated injections resulted in a U-shaped change in time to RORR with the longest latency after the first exposure (median: 50[1st-3rd quartile:36-56]min) and the shortest after the fifth exposure (16[13-33]min). Following fentanyl administration, heart rate dropped immediately by 225[95%CI: 179, 271]bpm (F=3952.16, p<.001), while EMG activity increased by 291[95%CI: 212, 370]% (F=27.51, p<0.001) and PaCO2 inclined by 49.4[95%CI: 40.6, 58.2]mmHg (F=75.97, p<0.001) within 5 minutes after injection. Additionally, pH decreased by 0.48[95%CI: 0.41, 0.54] (F=142.00, p<0.01), and PaO2 decreased by 50.4[40.8, 60.0]mmHg (F=57.90, p<0.001). Repeated fentanyl exposures did not significantly affect the extent of these changes (EMG: F=1.63, p=0.237; PaCO2: F=1.23, p=0.312; HR: F=1.05, p=0.400; pH: F=3.05, p=0.066; pO2: F=3.35, p=0.052). EEG analysis revealed that repeated fentanyl exposures elicited significantly higher absolute power in frequencies >20Hz as indicated by an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve >0.7.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We established a rodent model of repeated, high-dose fentanyl administration. Overall, significant evidence of tolerance was not observed after ten exposures of high-dose fentanyl for any of the analyzed parameters. These results suggest that tolerance does not develop for fentanyl-induced unconsciousness, muscle rigidity, or respiratory depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}