Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005738
Joseph R Starnes, Wendi Welch, Christopher Henderson, Stephen Hudson, Briana McVean, Scott Risney, George T Nicholson, Thomas P Doyle, Dana Janssen, Bevan P Londergan, David A Parra, James C Slaughter, Muktar H Aliyu, John A Graves, Jonathan H Soslow
Background: Retrospective studies suggest that pulse oximetry overestimates saturation in children from races that may be associated with darker skin tone. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) relies on similar optical technology, but less is known about the effect of skin tone on NIRS. This study aimed to quantify the effect of skin tone on NIRS performance.
Methods: Consecutive patients under 21 yr old undergoing cardiac catheterization were enrolled (N = 110). Skin tone was measured using spectrophotometry. Regional oxygen saturation was recorded from a Medtronic (USA) INVOS 5100C NIRS device placed on the forehead and was compared to the mixed venous saturation. Multivariable linear regressions were used to determine the effect of skin tone measured by individual typology angle (ITA).
Results: Mean bias was larger for patients with darker skin in ITA categories 5 and 6 at -12.8% compared to ITA categories 3 and 4 at -2.5% with a difference of 10.3% (95% CI, 4.4 to 16.3; P < 0.001) and ITA categories 1 and 2 at 0.3% with a difference of 13.1% (95% CI, 7.5 to 18.7; P < 0.001). ITA was associated with NIRS bias in multivariable regression analysis (coefficient, 0.173; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Darker skin tone is associated with worse NIRS performance and lower NIRS values compared to mixed venous saturation for the INVOS 5100C system. This may lead to differences in care and contribute to inequities in outcomes. Better validation guidelines are needed to ensure equity in performance across varying skin tones.
{"title":"Near-infrared Spectroscopy and Skin Tone in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Joseph R Starnes, Wendi Welch, Christopher Henderson, Stephen Hudson, Briana McVean, Scott Risney, George T Nicholson, Thomas P Doyle, Dana Janssen, Bevan P Londergan, David A Parra, James C Slaughter, Muktar H Aliyu, John A Graves, Jonathan H Soslow","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005738","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005738","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrospective studies suggest that pulse oximetry overestimates saturation in children from races that may be associated with darker skin tone. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) relies on similar optical technology, but less is known about the effect of skin tone on NIRS. This study aimed to quantify the effect of skin tone on NIRS performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients under 21 yr old undergoing cardiac catheterization were enrolled (N = 110). Skin tone was measured using spectrophotometry. Regional oxygen saturation was recorded from a Medtronic (USA) INVOS 5100C NIRS device placed on the forehead and was compared to the mixed venous saturation. Multivariable linear regressions were used to determine the effect of skin tone measured by individual typology angle (ITA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean bias was larger for patients with darker skin in ITA categories 5 and 6 at -12.8% compared to ITA categories 3 and 4 at -2.5% with a difference of 10.3% (95% CI, 4.4 to 16.3; P < 0.001) and ITA categories 1 and 2 at 0.3% with a difference of 13.1% (95% CI, 7.5 to 18.7; P < 0.001). ITA was associated with NIRS bias in multivariable regression analysis (coefficient, 0.173; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Darker skin tone is associated with worse NIRS performance and lower NIRS values compared to mixed venous saturation for the INVOS 5100C system. This may lead to differences in care and contribute to inequities in outcomes. Better validation guidelines are needed to ensure equity in performance across varying skin tones.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"134-142"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520187/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005683
Lukas Gasteiger, Philipp Lirk, Peter Marhofer, Elisabeth Gasteiger, Markus W Hollmann, Ottokar Stundner
Mixtures of local anesthetics and adjuvants or mixtures of different local anesthetics are frequently used in regional anesthesia to accelerate the speed of onset and increase the effect and the length of action. Recent in vitro evidence revealed extensive crystallization in mixtures of local anesthetics or local anesthetic-adjuvant mixtures, including those previously deemed "safe"-like lidocaine plus sodium bicarbonate. Several guidelines recommend the use of local anesthetic-adjuvant or mixtures of local anesthetics. In this narrative review, the authors examine the chemical, pharmacologic, and clinical implications of local anesthetic mixture use, illustrate data on efficacy, and highlight critical limitations, including the risk of particle formation, lack of pharmacologic rationale, and unclear propensity for systemic toxicity. Moreover, the authors map out a practical risk versus benefit relationship with recommendations. In light of the unclear safety profile and equivocal clinical benefit of certain mixtures of local anesthetics and local anesthetic-adjuvant mixtures, the authors caution against the routine use of some mixtures at this point, especially for neuraxial techniques.
{"title":"Is It Time to Reassess Local Anesthetic and Adjuvant Mixtures? A Narrative Review of Practice, Evidence, and Risks.","authors":"Lukas Gasteiger, Philipp Lirk, Peter Marhofer, Elisabeth Gasteiger, Markus W Hollmann, Ottokar Stundner","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005683","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005683","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mixtures of local anesthetics and adjuvants or mixtures of different local anesthetics are frequently used in regional anesthesia to accelerate the speed of onset and increase the effect and the length of action. Recent in vitro evidence revealed extensive crystallization in mixtures of local anesthetics or local anesthetic-adjuvant mixtures, including those previously deemed \"safe\"-like lidocaine plus sodium bicarbonate. Several guidelines recommend the use of local anesthetic-adjuvant or mixtures of local anesthetics. In this narrative review, the authors examine the chemical, pharmacologic, and clinical implications of local anesthetic mixture use, illustrate data on efficacy, and highlight critical limitations, including the risk of particle formation, lack of pharmacologic rationale, and unclear propensity for systemic toxicity. Moreover, the authors map out a practical risk versus benefit relationship with recommendations. In light of the unclear safety profile and equivocal clinical benefit of certain mixtures of local anesthetics and local anesthetic-adjuvant mixtures, the authors caution against the routine use of some mixtures at this point, especially for neuraxial techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"144 1","pages":"177-190"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145706919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005787
Daniel I Sessler
{"title":"Outcomes Research Consortium: Thirty-five-year Anniversary.","authors":"Daniel I Sessler","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005787","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005787","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"144 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145706990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005925
Katrina R Hamilton, Chung Jung Mun, Eliot Sadik, Cecilia L Bergeria, Andrew S Huhn, Traci J Speed, Ryan Vandrey, Kelly E Dunn, Claudia M Campbell
Background: This within-subject, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to determine the acute analgesic and drug effects, and risk for extramedical use, of synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and hydromorphone, alone and in combination, in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Methods: Participants (N=21; 57% women; Mean age=63.4±6.4) with KOA received oral combinations of placebo, hydromorphone (2 mg), and dronabinol (10 mg): (1, initial session) hydromorphone+placebo, (remaining sessions randomized) (2) placebo+placebo, (3) dronabinol+placebo, and (4) hydromorphone+dronabinol. Clinical and experimentally induced pain (quantitative sensory testing; QST), physical and cognitive function, subjective drug ratings, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at baseline and 60-, 120-, 180-, 240-minutes post-dosing.
Results: Primary Outcomes: Hydromorphone produced greater pressure pain threshold analgesia than dronabinol, p=0.029, ηp 2 =0.074; greater capsaicin (p=0.045, ηp 2 =0.062) and non-capsaicin (p=0.017, ηp 2 =0.087) sensitized mechanical temporal summation analgesia than placebo. There were no significant drug-related differences for clinical pain severity ηp 2 =0.011, thermal threshold ηp 2 =-0.025 or tolerance ηp 2 =-0.008, temporal summation ηp 2 =0.009, cold pressor ηp 2 =0.056, conditioned pain modulation ηp 2 =0.038, capsaicin-induced thermal threshold ηp 2 =-0.030, central sensitization ηp 2 =0.006, general pain sensitivity ηp 2 =0.021, or physical functioning (2-minute walking distance ηp 2 =0.028, Timed Up and Go ηp 2 =-0.027, total stair climb time ηp 2 =-0.005); all ps>.05. Secondary Outcomes : Hydromorphone impaired working memory accuracy compared to all conditions and produced greater Good Effects than placebo, ps≤.005; Hydromorphone+dronabinol impaired working memory reaction time and produced greater High ratings compared to placebo, greater Drug Effects than placebo and hydromorphone, and higher Nausea than hydromorphone, ps<.05; and Dronabinol had greater High ratings than hydromorphone, p=0.001. There were no significant drug-related differences for fine motor movement, Bad Effects, drug liking, or AE occurrence or severity (ps>.05).
Conclusions: Opioid and cannabinoid medications failed to produce robust analgesia in experimentally induced pain among patients with KOA. In contrast to preclinical studies, there was no evidence of synergistic analgesic effects by combining hydromorphone and dronabinol.
背景:本研究是一项受试者内、随机、安慰剂对照的研究,旨在确定合成的德尔塔-9-四氢大麻酚和氢吗啡酮在膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者中单独或联合使用的急性镇痛和药物效应,以及医疗外使用的风险。方法:患有KOA的参与者(N=21; 57%为女性;平均年龄=63.4±6.4)接受安慰剂、氢吗啡酮(2mg)和曲大麻酚(10mg)的口服联合治疗:(1)初始疗程)氢吗啡酮+安慰剂,(其余疗程随机)(2)安慰剂+安慰剂,(3)曲大麻酚+安慰剂,(4)氢吗啡酮+曲大麻酚。在基线和给药后60、120、180、240分钟评估临床和实验诱导的疼痛(定量感觉测试;QST)、身体和认知功能、主观药物评分和不良事件(ae)。结果:主要结局:氢吗啡酮产生的压痛阈镇痛优于屈大麻酚,p=0.029, ηp2=0.074;辣椒素(p=0.045, ηp2=0.062)和非辣椒素(p=0.017, ηp2=0.087)对颞部机械性镇痛的致敏性高于安慰剂。临床疼痛严重程度ηp2=0.011,热阈值ηp2=-0.025或耐受力ηp2=-0.008,时间总和ηp2= 0.009,冷压力ηp2=0.056,条件疼痛调节ηp2=0.038,辣椒素诱导的热阈值ηp2=-0.030,中央致敏ηp2= 0.006,一般疼痛敏感性ηp2= 0.021,身体功能(2分钟步行距离ηp2=0.028, Timed Up and Go ηp2=-0.027,总爬楼梯时间ηp2=-0.005)无显著药物相关差异;所有ps > . 05。次要结局:与所有情况相比,氢吗啡酮损害了工作记忆的准确性,并比安慰剂产生更大的良好效果,ps≤0.005;氢吗啡酮+屈大麻酚损害了工作记忆反应时间,与安慰剂相比产生了更高的评分,比安慰剂和氢吗啡酮更大的药物效应,比氢吗啡酮更高的恶心,p .05)。结论:阿片类药物和大麻素药物不能对KOA患者实验性疼痛产生强有力的镇痛作用。与临床前研究相反,没有证据表明氢吗啡酮与屈大麻酚联合使用具有协同镇痛作用。
{"title":"Evaluating the Acute Effects of the Cannabinoid Dronabinol and the Opioid Hydromorphone Alone and in Combination: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Katrina R Hamilton, Chung Jung Mun, Eliot Sadik, Cecilia L Bergeria, Andrew S Huhn, Traci J Speed, Ryan Vandrey, Kelly E Dunn, Claudia M Campbell","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005925","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This within-subject, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to determine the acute analgesic and drug effects, and risk for extramedical use, of synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and hydromorphone, alone and in combination, in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N=21; 57% women; Mean age=63.4±6.4) with KOA received oral combinations of placebo, hydromorphone (2 mg), and dronabinol (10 mg): (1, initial session) hydromorphone+placebo, (remaining sessions randomized) (2) placebo+placebo, (3) dronabinol+placebo, and (4) hydromorphone+dronabinol. Clinical and experimentally induced pain (quantitative sensory testing; QST), physical and cognitive function, subjective drug ratings, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at baseline and 60-, 120-, 180-, 240-minutes post-dosing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary Outcomes: Hydromorphone produced greater pressure pain threshold analgesia than dronabinol, p=0.029, ηp 2 =0.074; greater capsaicin (p=0.045, ηp 2 =0.062) and non-capsaicin (p=0.017, ηp 2 =0.087) sensitized mechanical temporal summation analgesia than placebo. There were no significant drug-related differences for clinical pain severity ηp 2 =0.011, thermal threshold ηp 2 =-0.025 or tolerance ηp 2 =-0.008, temporal summation ηp 2 =0.009, cold pressor ηp 2 =0.056, conditioned pain modulation ηp 2 =0.038, capsaicin-induced thermal threshold ηp 2 =-0.030, central sensitization ηp 2 =0.006, general pain sensitivity ηp 2 =0.021, or physical functioning (2-minute walking distance ηp 2 =0.028, Timed Up and Go ηp 2 =-0.027, total stair climb time ηp 2 =-0.005); all ps>.05. Secondary Outcomes : Hydromorphone impaired working memory accuracy compared to all conditions and produced greater Good Effects than placebo, ps≤.005; Hydromorphone+dronabinol impaired working memory reaction time and produced greater High ratings compared to placebo, greater Drug Effects than placebo and hydromorphone, and higher Nausea than hydromorphone, ps<.05; and Dronabinol had greater High ratings than hydromorphone, p=0.001. There were no significant drug-related differences for fine motor movement, Bad Effects, drug liking, or AE occurrence or severity (ps>.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Opioid and cannabinoid medications failed to produce robust analgesia in experimentally induced pain among patients with KOA. In contrast to preclinical studies, there was no evidence of synergistic analgesic effects by combining hydromorphone and dronabinol.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Myocardial injury after hip fracture surgery is common and associated with increased mortality. Acute pain is an important risk factor, but whether peripheral nerve block (PNB) could reduce postoperative myocardial injury remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between single-injection PNB, administered as an adjunct to general or neuraxial anesthesia, and postoperative myocardial injury in high-risk cardiac older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged ≥65 years who underwent hip fracture surgery under general or neuraxial anesthesia between 2012 and 2023 were included. Based on medical records, patients who received a single-injection PNB as an adjunct were assigned to the PNB group; those who did not were assigned to the non-PNB group. The primary outcome was postoperative myocardial injury, defined as any postoperative cardiac troponin measurement exceeding the 99th percentile upper reference limit during the index hospitalization. Confounding effects were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on 27 baseline and intraoperative variables. A weighted logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio for PNB versus non-PNB groups. Missing data (24.3% of cases) were imputed using multiple imputation.
Results: Data from 1,467 patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative myocardial injury occurred in 12.0% (96/798) of patients in the PNB group and 21.5% (144/669) in the non-PNB group. The weighted logistic regression analysis showed that single-injection PNB was associated with a significantly lower odds of postoperative myocardial injury (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.82; P=0.002).
Conclusions: Single-injection PNB as an adjunct to general or neuraxial anesthesia was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative myocardial injury in high-risk cardiac older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, possibly through mitigating the link between pain and myocardial injury. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.
{"title":"Association of Peripheral Nerve Block with Postoperative Myocardial Injury in High-Risk Cardiac Older Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Two-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Hongye Zhang, Jinyu Wu, Dongmei Ni, Yanxia Sun, Yi Ren, Yongsheng Miao, Na Jia, Yuelun Zhang, Zongyang Qu, Dong-Xin Wang, Zhen Hua","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005921","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myocardial injury after hip fracture surgery is common and associated with increased mortality. Acute pain is an important risk factor, but whether peripheral nerve block (PNB) could reduce postoperative myocardial injury remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between single-injection PNB, administered as an adjunct to general or neuraxial anesthesia, and postoperative myocardial injury in high-risk cardiac older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged ≥65 years who underwent hip fracture surgery under general or neuraxial anesthesia between 2012 and 2023 were included. Based on medical records, patients who received a single-injection PNB as an adjunct were assigned to the PNB group; those who did not were assigned to the non-PNB group. The primary outcome was postoperative myocardial injury, defined as any postoperative cardiac troponin measurement exceeding the 99th percentile upper reference limit during the index hospitalization. Confounding effects were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on 27 baseline and intraoperative variables. A weighted logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio for PNB versus non-PNB groups. Missing data (24.3% of cases) were imputed using multiple imputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,467 patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative myocardial injury occurred in 12.0% (96/798) of patients in the PNB group and 21.5% (144/669) in the non-PNB group. The weighted logistic regression analysis showed that single-injection PNB was associated with a significantly lower odds of postoperative myocardial injury (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.82; P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-injection PNB as an adjunct to general or neuraxial anesthesia was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative myocardial injury in high-risk cardiac older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, possibly through mitigating the link between pain and myocardial injury. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145888147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005834
Jordan William Talan,Brian Kaufman,Brendan A McGrath,Mark E Nunnally
{"title":"Management of Out-of-operating room Tracheostomy and Laryngectomy-related Emergencies.","authors":"Jordan William Talan,Brian Kaufman,Brendan A McGrath,Mark E Nunnally","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005834","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005834","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145847197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005919
Henrik Lynge Hovgaard,Simon Tilma Vistisen,Johannes Enevoldsen,Frank de Paoli,Rasmus Haarup Lie,Damir Salskov Obad,Peter Carøe Lind,Niels Katballe,Daniel Kjær,Martin R S Jørgensen,Zidryne Karaliunaite,Anni Nørgaard Jeppesen,Linda Riber,Thomas Tw Scheeren
BACKGROUNDOesophagectomy is a key treatment for oesophageal cancer but carries a high risk of postoperative complications, some potentially preventable through optimised haemodynamic management. Goal-directed fluid therapy individualises cardiac output targets but often applies fixed blood pressure thresholds and is discontinued before major postoperative fluid shifts occur. Extending goal-directed fluid therapy into the postoperative period with individualised blood pressure thresholds may address these limitations.METHODSIn this single-centre, prospective, blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients undergoing oesophagectomy were randomised 1:1 to either extended goal-directed fluid therapy or standard care. In the extended goal-directed fluid therapy group, cardiac output was optimised and mean arterial pressure threshold was the individual patient's night-time baseline. The protocol continued from tracheal intubation through to 07:00 the following morning. The primary outcome was total postoperative morbidity, measured by the Comprehensive Complication Index at day 30.RESULTSOf 100 patients (49 extended goal-directed fluid therapy group, 51 standard group), extended goal-directed fluid therapy was associated with a higher fluid balance (2,517 ± 1,194 mL vs 2,001 ± 1,114 mL, mean difference: 516 mL, 95% CI: 57 - 974, p = 0.028), increased norepinephrine use (median: 7,894 μg [IQR: 3,946-13,793] vs 4,611 μg [IQR: 2,138-7,296], p < 0.001), and higher mean arterial pressure (mean difference: 3 mmHg, 95% CI: 1-5, p = 0.011). At day 30, mean Comprehensive Complication Index did not differ between groups (39.0 ± 20.0 vs 39.2 ± 21.0; mean difference: -0.2; 95% CI: -8.6 to 8.1; p = 0.95).CONCLUSIONDespite achieving protocol-driven treatment differences, extended and individualised goal-directed fluid therapy did not reduce postoperative complications following oesophagectomy.
背景食管癌切除术是食管癌的关键治疗方法,但术后并发症的风险很高,一些可能通过优化血流动力学管理来预防。目标导向的液体治疗个体化心输出量目标,但通常采用固定的血压阈值,并在术后发生重大液体转移之前停止。将目标导向的液体治疗扩展到个体化血压阈值的术后期可以解决这些局限性。方法:在这项单中心、前瞻性、盲法、随机对照试验中,接受食管切除术的患者按1:1的比例随机分为延长目标导向液体治疗组或标准治疗组。在扩展目标定向液体治疗组,心输出量得到优化,平均动脉压阈值是个体患者的夜间基线。治疗方案从气管插管一直持续到第二天早上7点。主要终点是术后总发病率,用第30天的综合并发症指数来衡量。结果在100例患者中(扩展目标定向液体治疗组49例,标准组51例),扩展目标定向液体治疗与较高的体液平衡(2,517±1,194 mL vs 2,001±1,114 mL,平均差值:516 mL, 95% CI: 57 - 974, p = 0.028),去甲肾上腺素使用增加(中位数:7,894 μg [IQR: 3,946-13,793] vs 4,611 μg [IQR: 2,138-7,296], p < 0.001),较高的平均动脉压(平均差值:3 mmHg, 95% CI: 1-5, p = 0.011)相关。在第30天,两组患者的平均综合并发症指数无差异(39.0±20.0 vs 39.2±21.0;平均差异:-0.2;95% CI: -8.6 ~ 8.1; p = 0.95)。结论:尽管实现了方案驱动的治疗差异,但延长和个体化目标导向的液体治疗并没有减少食管切除术后的并发症。
{"title":"Individualised Perioperative Blood Pressure and Fluid Therapy in Oesophagectomy a prospective, single-blind randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Henrik Lynge Hovgaard,Simon Tilma Vistisen,Johannes Enevoldsen,Frank de Paoli,Rasmus Haarup Lie,Damir Salskov Obad,Peter Carøe Lind,Niels Katballe,Daniel Kjær,Martin R S Jørgensen,Zidryne Karaliunaite,Anni Nørgaard Jeppesen,Linda Riber,Thomas Tw Scheeren","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005919","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDOesophagectomy is a key treatment for oesophageal cancer but carries a high risk of postoperative complications, some potentially preventable through optimised haemodynamic management. Goal-directed fluid therapy individualises cardiac output targets but often applies fixed blood pressure thresholds and is discontinued before major postoperative fluid shifts occur. Extending goal-directed fluid therapy into the postoperative period with individualised blood pressure thresholds may address these limitations.METHODSIn this single-centre, prospective, blinded, randomised controlled trial, patients undergoing oesophagectomy were randomised 1:1 to either extended goal-directed fluid therapy or standard care. In the extended goal-directed fluid therapy group, cardiac output was optimised and mean arterial pressure threshold was the individual patient's night-time baseline. The protocol continued from tracheal intubation through to 07:00 the following morning. The primary outcome was total postoperative morbidity, measured by the Comprehensive Complication Index at day 30.RESULTSOf 100 patients (49 extended goal-directed fluid therapy group, 51 standard group), extended goal-directed fluid therapy was associated with a higher fluid balance (2,517 ± 1,194 mL vs 2,001 ± 1,114 mL, mean difference: 516 mL, 95% CI: 57 - 974, p = 0.028), increased norepinephrine use (median: 7,894 μg [IQR: 3,946-13,793] vs 4,611 μg [IQR: 2,138-7,296], p < 0.001), and higher mean arterial pressure (mean difference: 3 mmHg, 95% CI: 1-5, p = 0.011). At day 30, mean Comprehensive Complication Index did not differ between groups (39.0 ± 20.0 vs 39.2 ± 21.0; mean difference: -0.2; 95% CI: -8.6 to 8.1; p = 0.95).CONCLUSIONDespite achieving protocol-driven treatment differences, extended and individualised goal-directed fluid therapy did not reduce postoperative complications following oesophagectomy.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145830321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005920
Anne L Donovan,Ting Guo,Seyedeh Ala Mokhtabad Amrei,Joyce Chang,Jina Sinskey,Oana Maties,Rachel Schwartz
BACKGROUNDSince anesthesiologists report the highest intent to leave academic practice of all specialties, understanding the factors driving attrition is essential to maintaining a robust academic workforce. This study aims to explore how academic anesthesiology faculty at various stages of life define and navigate meaningful, sustainable careers in the context of growing clinical, academic, and personal demands and to identify individual-level strategies for long-term career satisfaction in academic anesthesiology.METHODSVirtual focus groups with faculty representing a range of clinical sub-specialties, academic interests, and career stages and practicing across six diverse clinical sites within an academic anesthesiology department were conducted. Six focus groups were stratified by both career stage and self-identified gender (early-career, mid-career, established-career men and women). Three additional focus groups involved participants who self-selected into one of the following groups: Underrepresented in Medicine, Parents, and Researchers. Due to scheduling constraints, two separate focus groups were held for the established-career men, whereas all other groups were conducted in a single session. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and de-identified prior to performing an inductive thematic analysis.RESULTSFive themes were identified: (1) Forming a Professional Identity Through Use of a "Purposeful Yes;" (2) Understanding One's Professional Motivators; (3) Integrating Work and Life; (4) Progressing Along a Career Arc; and (5) Overcoming Impostor Phenomenon. Each theme corresponds to one or more questions that can assist faculty members in defining their professional goals, priorities, and values. These questions form the basis of a conceptual framework offered as a practical tool for strategically shaping one's professional efforts, building a mentorship team, and periodically re-evaluating progress toward goals.CONCLUSIONSIn this study, five themes are synthesized into a series of guiding questions that form the basis of a conceptual framework for advancing career fulfillment and retention in academic anesthesiology. Use of a "Purposeful Yes" guided by personal values and motivations allows an individual to strategically shape his or her efforts toward a desirable and sustainable career pathway.
{"title":"Developing a Framework for Career Fulfillment in Academic Anesthesiology: Findings from a Single-Institution Focus Group Study.","authors":"Anne L Donovan,Ting Guo,Seyedeh Ala Mokhtabad Amrei,Joyce Chang,Jina Sinskey,Oana Maties,Rachel Schwartz","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005920","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDSince anesthesiologists report the highest intent to leave academic practice of all specialties, understanding the factors driving attrition is essential to maintaining a robust academic workforce. This study aims to explore how academic anesthesiology faculty at various stages of life define and navigate meaningful, sustainable careers in the context of growing clinical, academic, and personal demands and to identify individual-level strategies for long-term career satisfaction in academic anesthesiology.METHODSVirtual focus groups with faculty representing a range of clinical sub-specialties, academic interests, and career stages and practicing across six diverse clinical sites within an academic anesthesiology department were conducted. Six focus groups were stratified by both career stage and self-identified gender (early-career, mid-career, established-career men and women). Three additional focus groups involved participants who self-selected into one of the following groups: Underrepresented in Medicine, Parents, and Researchers. Due to scheduling constraints, two separate focus groups were held for the established-career men, whereas all other groups were conducted in a single session. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and de-identified prior to performing an inductive thematic analysis.RESULTSFive themes were identified: (1) Forming a Professional Identity Through Use of a \"Purposeful Yes;\" (2) Understanding One's Professional Motivators; (3) Integrating Work and Life; (4) Progressing Along a Career Arc; and (5) Overcoming Impostor Phenomenon. Each theme corresponds to one or more questions that can assist faculty members in defining their professional goals, priorities, and values. These questions form the basis of a conceptual framework offered as a practical tool for strategically shaping one's professional efforts, building a mentorship team, and periodically re-evaluating progress toward goals.CONCLUSIONSIn this study, five themes are synthesized into a series of guiding questions that form the basis of a conceptual framework for advancing career fulfillment and retention in academic anesthesiology. Use of a \"Purposeful Yes\" guided by personal values and motivations allows an individual to strategically shape his or her efforts toward a desirable and sustainable career pathway.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145830325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}