Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-06DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005773
Kayla Gaye, Emily Newton, Janet Zhang, Alexander S Doyal
{"title":"Severe Esophageal Food Impaction: A Silent Threat to the Airway.","authors":"Kayla Gaye, Emily Newton, Janet Zhang, Alexander S Doyal","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005773","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005773","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"154-155"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145450198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-10DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005782
Elena Ahrens, Nikolai Ratajczak, Maximilian S Schaefer
{"title":"Acetaminophen 5-HT 3 Antagonist Interaction: Reply.","authors":"Elena Ahrens, Nikolai Ratajczak, Maximilian S Schaefer","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005782","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005782","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"246-247"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145480655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005772
Annie Xin, Christopher Brasher, Martin W Dünser, Tobias Gauss
The practice of anesthesiology is both an art and a science. Despite the increasing emphasis on using scientific evidence to inform clinical decisions, the "art" of considering the contextual intricacies surrounding those decisions is equally important. This article borrows concepts from quantum mechanics and discuss how anesthesiology, too, is practiced and researched in complex systems with intrinsic uncertainty and unpredictability. The authors encourage the reader to reflect on the influence of contextual factors when appraising and applying scientific evidence to their own practice.
{"title":"Insights from Modern Physics.","authors":"Annie Xin, Christopher Brasher, Martin W Dünser, Tobias Gauss","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005772","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005772","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The practice of anesthesiology is both an art and a science. Despite the increasing emphasis on using scientific evidence to inform clinical decisions, the \"art\" of considering the contextual intricacies surrounding those decisions is equally important. This article borrows concepts from quantum mechanics and discuss how anesthesiology, too, is practiced and researched in complex systems with intrinsic uncertainty and unpredictability. The authors encourage the reader to reflect on the influence of contextual factors when appraising and applying scientific evidence to their own practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"144 1","pages":"17-18"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145706956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: General anesthesia induces both unconsciousness and respiratory depression, but whether these effects share a common neural substrate remains unclear. The parafacial zone, a γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABAergic) sleep-promoting region, has been proposed to modulate respiration. This study investigates whether parafacial zone GABAergic neurons function as a common neural node coordinating anesthetic-induced unconsciousness and respiratory suppression.
Methods: A total of 95 male mice (10 to 12 weeks old) were used. Chemogenetic and optogenetic methods targeted parafacial zone GABAergic neurons to assess anesthetic efficacy and respiratory changes. Immunostaining evaluated neuronal activation, and awake-state stimulation tested for anesthesia-like effects.
Results: Chemogenetic activation of parafacial zone GABAergic neurons enhanced anesthetic sensitivity, shifting the sevoflurane dose-response curve leftward (50% effective dose, 0.662%; 95% confidence interval, 0.624 to 0.699% vs . 1.569%; 95% confidence interval, 1.502 to 1.637%) and lowering the concentration required for loss of righting reflex (0.735 ± 0.027% vs . 1.601 ± 0.048%; P < 0.0001; n = 10). Induction was faster (48 ± 4 s vs . 112 ± 3 s; P < 0.0001; n = 8), and emergence was delayed (435 ± 12 s vs . 89 ± 12 s; P < 0.0001; n = 8). Electroencephalogram showed increased delta and decreased theta power. Respiratory rate declined significantly (183 ± 24 breaths/min vs . 471 ± 3 breaths/min; P < 0.0001; n = 8). During anesthesia, brief optogenetic activation of parafacial zone GABAergic neurons immediately elevated the burst suppression ratio (69.5 ± 5.1% vs . 32.5 ± 7.7%; P < 0.0001; n = 9) and reduced the respiratory rate (38 ± 13 breaths/min vs . 120 ± 21 breaths/min; P = 0.0016; n = 7), indicating concurrent modulation of cortical and respiratory function. Chemogenetic inhibition weakened anesthetic potency. Increased c-Fos expression in parafacial zone GABAergic neurons during sevoflurane anesthesia confirmed their recruitment. In awake mice, optogenetic activation alone induced a low-arousal state with several features of anesthesia, including hypoactivity, analgesia, respiratory depression, and cortical suppression without abolishing righting reflex.
Conclusions: The GABAergic parafacial zone is a shared critical node regulating both respiration and consciousness during sevoflurane anesthesia. Its activation suppresses both, helping explain anesthesia-related respiratory depression.
背景:全身麻醉诱导无意识和呼吸抑制,但这些作用是否有共同的神经基质尚不清楚。旁面区(PZ)是一个gaba能促进睡眠的区域,已被提出调节呼吸。本研究探讨PZ gaba能神经元是否作为一个共同的神经节点协调麻醉诱导的无意识和呼吸抑制。方法:选取10 ~ 12周龄雄性小鼠95只。化学遗传学和光遗传学方法针对PZ gaba能神经元评估麻醉效果和呼吸变化。免疫染色评估神经元激活,清醒状态刺激测试麻醉样效果。结果:化学发生激活PZ gaba能神经元增强麻醉敏感性,使七氟烷剂量反应曲线左移(ED50: 0.662%, 95% CI: 0.624-0.699% vs. 1.569%, 95% CI: 1.502-1.637%),降低翻正反射丧失所需的浓度(0.735±0.027% vs. 1.601±0.048%,P < 0.0001, n = 10)。诱导更快(48±4 s比112±3 s, P < 0.0001, n = 8),出现延迟(435±12 s比89±12 s, P < 0.0001, n = 8)。脑电图显示波能量增加,波能量减少。呼吸频率明显下降(183±24 bpm比471±3 bpm, P < 0.0001, n = 8)。在麻醉过程中,PZ gaba能神经元的短暂光遗传激活立即提高了爆发抑制率(69.5±5.1% vs. 32.5±7.7%,P < 0.0001, n = 9),降低了呼吸速率(38±13 bpm vs. 120±21 bpm, P = 0.0016, n = 7),表明皮质和呼吸功能同时调节。化学发生抑制减弱了麻醉效力。七氟醚麻醉时PZ gaba能神经元c-Fos表达增加证实了它们的募集。在清醒的小鼠中,光遗传激活单独诱导低觉醒状态,具有麻醉的几个特征,包括低活动、镇痛、呼吸抑制和皮层抑制,但不消除翻正反射。结论:七氟醚麻醉时,gaba能PZ是调节呼吸和意识的共享关键节点;它的激活抑制了两者,有助于解释麻醉相关的呼吸抑制。
{"title":"γ-Aminobutyric Acid-mediated Parafacial Zone: Integrating Consciousness and Respiratory Control in Sevoflurane Anesthesia.","authors":"Linlin Luo, Zaixun Qin, Mei Chen, Yuanli Pi, Ying Wang, Zongcheng Jiang, Zhimin Deng, Jia Li, Xuejiao Dou, Junli Jiang, Haiying Wang, Shouyang Yu, Tian Yu, Tianyuan Luo","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005735","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005735","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General anesthesia induces both unconsciousness and respiratory depression, but whether these effects share a common neural substrate remains unclear. The parafacial zone, a γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABAergic) sleep-promoting region, has been proposed to modulate respiration. This study investigates whether parafacial zone GABAergic neurons function as a common neural node coordinating anesthetic-induced unconsciousness and respiratory suppression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 male mice (10 to 12 weeks old) were used. Chemogenetic and optogenetic methods targeted parafacial zone GABAergic neurons to assess anesthetic efficacy and respiratory changes. Immunostaining evaluated neuronal activation, and awake-state stimulation tested for anesthesia-like effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chemogenetic activation of parafacial zone GABAergic neurons enhanced anesthetic sensitivity, shifting the sevoflurane dose-response curve leftward (50% effective dose, 0.662%; 95% confidence interval, 0.624 to 0.699% vs . 1.569%; 95% confidence interval, 1.502 to 1.637%) and lowering the concentration required for loss of righting reflex (0.735 ± 0.027% vs . 1.601 ± 0.048%; P < 0.0001; n = 10). Induction was faster (48 ± 4 s vs . 112 ± 3 s; P < 0.0001; n = 8), and emergence was delayed (435 ± 12 s vs . 89 ± 12 s; P < 0.0001; n = 8). Electroencephalogram showed increased delta and decreased theta power. Respiratory rate declined significantly (183 ± 24 breaths/min vs . 471 ± 3 breaths/min; P < 0.0001; n = 8). During anesthesia, brief optogenetic activation of parafacial zone GABAergic neurons immediately elevated the burst suppression ratio (69.5 ± 5.1% vs . 32.5 ± 7.7%; P < 0.0001; n = 9) and reduced the respiratory rate (38 ± 13 breaths/min vs . 120 ± 21 breaths/min; P = 0.0016; n = 7), indicating concurrent modulation of cortical and respiratory function. Chemogenetic inhibition weakened anesthetic potency. Increased c-Fos expression in parafacial zone GABAergic neurons during sevoflurane anesthesia confirmed their recruitment. In awake mice, optogenetic activation alone induced a low-arousal state with several features of anesthesia, including hypoactivity, analgesia, respiratory depression, and cortical suppression without abolishing righting reflex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GABAergic parafacial zone is a shared critical node regulating both respiration and consciousness during sevoflurane anesthesia. Its activation suppresses both, helping explain anesthesia-related respiratory depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"116-133"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12677344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-29DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005738
Joseph R Starnes, Wendi Welch, Christopher Henderson, Stephen Hudson, Briana McVean, Scott Risney, George T Nicholson, Thomas P Doyle, Dana Janssen, Bevan P Londergan, David A Parra, James C Slaughter, Muktar H Aliyu, John A Graves, Jonathan H Soslow
Background: Retrospective studies suggest that pulse oximetry overestimates saturation in children from races that may be associated with darker skin tone. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) relies on similar optical technology, but less is known about the effect of skin tone on NIRS. This study aimed to quantify the effect of skin tone on NIRS performance.
Methods: Consecutive patients under 21 yr old undergoing cardiac catheterization were enrolled (N = 110). Skin tone was measured using spectrophotometry. Regional oxygen saturation was recorded from a Medtronic (USA) INVOS 5100C NIRS device placed on the forehead and was compared to the mixed venous saturation. Multivariable linear regressions were used to determine the effect of skin tone measured by individual typology angle (ITA).
Results: Mean bias was larger for patients with darker skin in ITA categories 5 and 6 at -12.8% compared to ITA categories 3 and 4 at -2.5% with a difference of 10.3% (95% CI, 4.4 to 16.3; P < 0.001) and ITA categories 1 and 2 at 0.3% with a difference of 13.1% (95% CI, 7.5 to 18.7; P < 0.001). ITA was associated with NIRS bias in multivariable regression analysis (coefficient, 0.173; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Darker skin tone is associated with worse NIRS performance and lower NIRS values compared to mixed venous saturation for the INVOS 5100C system. This may lead to differences in care and contribute to inequities in outcomes. Better validation guidelines are needed to ensure equity in performance across varying skin tones.
{"title":"Near-infrared Spectroscopy and Skin Tone in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Joseph R Starnes, Wendi Welch, Christopher Henderson, Stephen Hudson, Briana McVean, Scott Risney, George T Nicholson, Thomas P Doyle, Dana Janssen, Bevan P Londergan, David A Parra, James C Slaughter, Muktar H Aliyu, John A Graves, Jonathan H Soslow","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005738","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005738","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrospective studies suggest that pulse oximetry overestimates saturation in children from races that may be associated with darker skin tone. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) relies on similar optical technology, but less is known about the effect of skin tone on NIRS. This study aimed to quantify the effect of skin tone on NIRS performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients under 21 yr old undergoing cardiac catheterization were enrolled (N = 110). Skin tone was measured using spectrophotometry. Regional oxygen saturation was recorded from a Medtronic (USA) INVOS 5100C NIRS device placed on the forehead and was compared to the mixed venous saturation. Multivariable linear regressions were used to determine the effect of skin tone measured by individual typology angle (ITA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean bias was larger for patients with darker skin in ITA categories 5 and 6 at -12.8% compared to ITA categories 3 and 4 at -2.5% with a difference of 10.3% (95% CI, 4.4 to 16.3; P < 0.001) and ITA categories 1 and 2 at 0.3% with a difference of 13.1% (95% CI, 7.5 to 18.7; P < 0.001). ITA was associated with NIRS bias in multivariable regression analysis (coefficient, 0.173; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Darker skin tone is associated with worse NIRS performance and lower NIRS values compared to mixed venous saturation for the INVOS 5100C system. This may lead to differences in care and contribute to inequities in outcomes. Better validation guidelines are needed to ensure equity in performance across varying skin tones.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"134-142"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520187/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005683
Lukas Gasteiger, Philipp Lirk, Peter Marhofer, Elisabeth Gasteiger, Markus W Hollmann, Ottokar Stundner
Mixtures of local anesthetics and adjuvants or mixtures of different local anesthetics are frequently used in regional anesthesia to accelerate the speed of onset and increase the effect and the length of action. Recent in vitro evidence revealed extensive crystallization in mixtures of local anesthetics or local anesthetic-adjuvant mixtures, including those previously deemed "safe"-like lidocaine plus sodium bicarbonate. Several guidelines recommend the use of local anesthetic-adjuvant or mixtures of local anesthetics. In this narrative review, the authors examine the chemical, pharmacologic, and clinical implications of local anesthetic mixture use, illustrate data on efficacy, and highlight critical limitations, including the risk of particle formation, lack of pharmacologic rationale, and unclear propensity for systemic toxicity. Moreover, the authors map out a practical risk versus benefit relationship with recommendations. In light of the unclear safety profile and equivocal clinical benefit of certain mixtures of local anesthetics and local anesthetic-adjuvant mixtures, the authors caution against the routine use of some mixtures at this point, especially for neuraxial techniques.
{"title":"Is It Time to Reassess Local Anesthetic and Adjuvant Mixtures? A Narrative Review of Practice, Evidence, and Risks.","authors":"Lukas Gasteiger, Philipp Lirk, Peter Marhofer, Elisabeth Gasteiger, Markus W Hollmann, Ottokar Stundner","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005683","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005683","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mixtures of local anesthetics and adjuvants or mixtures of different local anesthetics are frequently used in regional anesthesia to accelerate the speed of onset and increase the effect and the length of action. Recent in vitro evidence revealed extensive crystallization in mixtures of local anesthetics or local anesthetic-adjuvant mixtures, including those previously deemed \"safe\"-like lidocaine plus sodium bicarbonate. Several guidelines recommend the use of local anesthetic-adjuvant or mixtures of local anesthetics. In this narrative review, the authors examine the chemical, pharmacologic, and clinical implications of local anesthetic mixture use, illustrate data on efficacy, and highlight critical limitations, including the risk of particle formation, lack of pharmacologic rationale, and unclear propensity for systemic toxicity. Moreover, the authors map out a practical risk versus benefit relationship with recommendations. In light of the unclear safety profile and equivocal clinical benefit of certain mixtures of local anesthetics and local anesthetic-adjuvant mixtures, the authors caution against the routine use of some mixtures at this point, especially for neuraxial techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"144 1","pages":"177-190"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145706919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005787
Daniel I Sessler
{"title":"Outcomes Research Consortium: Thirty-five-year Anniversary.","authors":"Daniel I Sessler","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005787","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005787","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"144 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145706990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005925
Katrina R Hamilton, Chung Jung Mun, Eliot Sadik, Cecilia L Bergeria, Andrew S Huhn, Traci J Speed, Ryan Vandrey, Kelly E Dunn, Claudia M Campbell
Background: This within-subject, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to determine the acute analgesic and drug effects, and risk for extramedical use, of synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and hydromorphone, alone and in combination, in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Methods: Participants (N=21; 57% women; Mean age=63.4±6.4) with KOA received oral combinations of placebo, hydromorphone (2 mg), and dronabinol (10 mg): (1, initial session) hydromorphone+placebo, (remaining sessions randomized) (2) placebo+placebo, (3) dronabinol+placebo, and (4) hydromorphone+dronabinol. Clinical and experimentally induced pain (quantitative sensory testing; QST), physical and cognitive function, subjective drug ratings, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at baseline and 60-, 120-, 180-, 240-minutes post-dosing.
Results: Primary Outcomes: Hydromorphone produced greater pressure pain threshold analgesia than dronabinol, p=0.029, ηp 2 =0.074; greater capsaicin (p=0.045, ηp 2 =0.062) and non-capsaicin (p=0.017, ηp 2 =0.087) sensitized mechanical temporal summation analgesia than placebo. There were no significant drug-related differences for clinical pain severity ηp 2 =0.011, thermal threshold ηp 2 =-0.025 or tolerance ηp 2 =-0.008, temporal summation ηp 2 =0.009, cold pressor ηp 2 =0.056, conditioned pain modulation ηp 2 =0.038, capsaicin-induced thermal threshold ηp 2 =-0.030, central sensitization ηp 2 =0.006, general pain sensitivity ηp 2 =0.021, or physical functioning (2-minute walking distance ηp 2 =0.028, Timed Up and Go ηp 2 =-0.027, total stair climb time ηp 2 =-0.005); all ps>.05. Secondary Outcomes : Hydromorphone impaired working memory accuracy compared to all conditions and produced greater Good Effects than placebo, ps≤.005; Hydromorphone+dronabinol impaired working memory reaction time and produced greater High ratings compared to placebo, greater Drug Effects than placebo and hydromorphone, and higher Nausea than hydromorphone, ps<.05; and Dronabinol had greater High ratings than hydromorphone, p=0.001. There were no significant drug-related differences for fine motor movement, Bad Effects, drug liking, or AE occurrence or severity (ps>.05).
Conclusions: Opioid and cannabinoid medications failed to produce robust analgesia in experimentally induced pain among patients with KOA. In contrast to preclinical studies, there was no evidence of synergistic analgesic effects by combining hydromorphone and dronabinol.
背景:本研究是一项受试者内、随机、安慰剂对照的研究,旨在确定合成的德尔塔-9-四氢大麻酚和氢吗啡酮在膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者中单独或联合使用的急性镇痛和药物效应,以及医疗外使用的风险。方法:患有KOA的参与者(N=21; 57%为女性;平均年龄=63.4±6.4)接受安慰剂、氢吗啡酮(2mg)和曲大麻酚(10mg)的口服联合治疗:(1)初始疗程)氢吗啡酮+安慰剂,(其余疗程随机)(2)安慰剂+安慰剂,(3)曲大麻酚+安慰剂,(4)氢吗啡酮+曲大麻酚。在基线和给药后60、120、180、240分钟评估临床和实验诱导的疼痛(定量感觉测试;QST)、身体和认知功能、主观药物评分和不良事件(ae)。结果:主要结局:氢吗啡酮产生的压痛阈镇痛优于屈大麻酚,p=0.029, ηp2=0.074;辣椒素(p=0.045, ηp2=0.062)和非辣椒素(p=0.017, ηp2=0.087)对颞部机械性镇痛的致敏性高于安慰剂。临床疼痛严重程度ηp2=0.011,热阈值ηp2=-0.025或耐受力ηp2=-0.008,时间总和ηp2= 0.009,冷压力ηp2=0.056,条件疼痛调节ηp2=0.038,辣椒素诱导的热阈值ηp2=-0.030,中央致敏ηp2= 0.006,一般疼痛敏感性ηp2= 0.021,身体功能(2分钟步行距离ηp2=0.028, Timed Up and Go ηp2=-0.027,总爬楼梯时间ηp2=-0.005)无显著药物相关差异;所有ps > . 05。次要结局:与所有情况相比,氢吗啡酮损害了工作记忆的准确性,并比安慰剂产生更大的良好效果,ps≤0.005;氢吗啡酮+屈大麻酚损害了工作记忆反应时间,与安慰剂相比产生了更高的评分,比安慰剂和氢吗啡酮更大的药物效应,比氢吗啡酮更高的恶心,p .05)。结论:阿片类药物和大麻素药物不能对KOA患者实验性疼痛产生强有力的镇痛作用。与临床前研究相反,没有证据表明氢吗啡酮与屈大麻酚联合使用具有协同镇痛作用。
{"title":"Evaluating the Acute Effects of the Cannabinoid Dronabinol and the Opioid Hydromorphone Alone and in Combination: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Katrina R Hamilton, Chung Jung Mun, Eliot Sadik, Cecilia L Bergeria, Andrew S Huhn, Traci J Speed, Ryan Vandrey, Kelly E Dunn, Claudia M Campbell","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005925","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This within-subject, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to determine the acute analgesic and drug effects, and risk for extramedical use, of synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and hydromorphone, alone and in combination, in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N=21; 57% women; Mean age=63.4±6.4) with KOA received oral combinations of placebo, hydromorphone (2 mg), and dronabinol (10 mg): (1, initial session) hydromorphone+placebo, (remaining sessions randomized) (2) placebo+placebo, (3) dronabinol+placebo, and (4) hydromorphone+dronabinol. Clinical and experimentally induced pain (quantitative sensory testing; QST), physical and cognitive function, subjective drug ratings, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at baseline and 60-, 120-, 180-, 240-minutes post-dosing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary Outcomes: Hydromorphone produced greater pressure pain threshold analgesia than dronabinol, p=0.029, ηp 2 =0.074; greater capsaicin (p=0.045, ηp 2 =0.062) and non-capsaicin (p=0.017, ηp 2 =0.087) sensitized mechanical temporal summation analgesia than placebo. There were no significant drug-related differences for clinical pain severity ηp 2 =0.011, thermal threshold ηp 2 =-0.025 or tolerance ηp 2 =-0.008, temporal summation ηp 2 =0.009, cold pressor ηp 2 =0.056, conditioned pain modulation ηp 2 =0.038, capsaicin-induced thermal threshold ηp 2 =-0.030, central sensitization ηp 2 =0.006, general pain sensitivity ηp 2 =0.021, or physical functioning (2-minute walking distance ηp 2 =0.028, Timed Up and Go ηp 2 =-0.027, total stair climb time ηp 2 =-0.005); all ps>.05. Secondary Outcomes : Hydromorphone impaired working memory accuracy compared to all conditions and produced greater Good Effects than placebo, ps≤.005; Hydromorphone+dronabinol impaired working memory reaction time and produced greater High ratings compared to placebo, greater Drug Effects than placebo and hydromorphone, and higher Nausea than hydromorphone, ps<.05; and Dronabinol had greater High ratings than hydromorphone, p=0.001. There were no significant drug-related differences for fine motor movement, Bad Effects, drug liking, or AE occurrence or severity (ps>.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Opioid and cannabinoid medications failed to produce robust analgesia in experimentally induced pain among patients with KOA. In contrast to preclinical studies, there was no evidence of synergistic analgesic effects by combining hydromorphone and dronabinol.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Myocardial injury after hip fracture surgery is common and associated with increased mortality. Acute pain is an important risk factor, but whether peripheral nerve block (PNB) could reduce postoperative myocardial injury remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between single-injection PNB, administered as an adjunct to general or neuraxial anesthesia, and postoperative myocardial injury in high-risk cardiac older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged ≥65 years who underwent hip fracture surgery under general or neuraxial anesthesia between 2012 and 2023 were included. Based on medical records, patients who received a single-injection PNB as an adjunct were assigned to the PNB group; those who did not were assigned to the non-PNB group. The primary outcome was postoperative myocardial injury, defined as any postoperative cardiac troponin measurement exceeding the 99th percentile upper reference limit during the index hospitalization. Confounding effects were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on 27 baseline and intraoperative variables. A weighted logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio for PNB versus non-PNB groups. Missing data (24.3% of cases) were imputed using multiple imputation.
Results: Data from 1,467 patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative myocardial injury occurred in 12.0% (96/798) of patients in the PNB group and 21.5% (144/669) in the non-PNB group. The weighted logistic regression analysis showed that single-injection PNB was associated with a significantly lower odds of postoperative myocardial injury (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.82; P=0.002).
Conclusions: Single-injection PNB as an adjunct to general or neuraxial anesthesia was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative myocardial injury in high-risk cardiac older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, possibly through mitigating the link between pain and myocardial injury. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.
{"title":"Association of Peripheral Nerve Block with Postoperative Myocardial Injury in High-Risk Cardiac Older Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Two-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Hongye Zhang, Jinyu Wu, Dongmei Ni, Yanxia Sun, Yi Ren, Yongsheng Miao, Na Jia, Yuelun Zhang, Zongyang Qu, Dong-Xin Wang, Zhen Hua","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005921","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myocardial injury after hip fracture surgery is common and associated with increased mortality. Acute pain is an important risk factor, but whether peripheral nerve block (PNB) could reduce postoperative myocardial injury remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between single-injection PNB, administered as an adjunct to general or neuraxial anesthesia, and postoperative myocardial injury in high-risk cardiac older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged ≥65 years who underwent hip fracture surgery under general or neuraxial anesthesia between 2012 and 2023 were included. Based on medical records, patients who received a single-injection PNB as an adjunct were assigned to the PNB group; those who did not were assigned to the non-PNB group. The primary outcome was postoperative myocardial injury, defined as any postoperative cardiac troponin measurement exceeding the 99th percentile upper reference limit during the index hospitalization. Confounding effects were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on 27 baseline and intraoperative variables. A weighted logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio for PNB versus non-PNB groups. Missing data (24.3% of cases) were imputed using multiple imputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1,467 patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative myocardial injury occurred in 12.0% (96/798) of patients in the PNB group and 21.5% (144/669) in the non-PNB group. The weighted logistic regression analysis showed that single-injection PNB was associated with a significantly lower odds of postoperative myocardial injury (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.82; P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-injection PNB as an adjunct to general or neuraxial anesthesia was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative myocardial injury in high-risk cardiac older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, possibly through mitigating the link between pain and myocardial injury. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145888147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}