Anesthesiology最新文献

Background: The objective of this study was to examine insurance-based disparities in mortality, nonhome discharges, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Methods: Using a national database of U.S. academic medical centers and their affiliated hospitals, the risk-adjusted association between mortality, nonhome discharge, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization and (1) the type of insurance coverage (private insurance, Medicare, dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid, and no insurance) and (2) the weekly hospital COVID-19 burden (0 to 5.0%; 5.1 to 10%, 10.1 to 20%, 20.1 to 30%, and 30.1% and greater) was evaluated. Modeling was expanded to include an interaction between payer status and the weekly hospital COVID-19 burden to examine whether the lack of private insurance was associated with increases in disparities as the COVID-19 burden increased.

Results: Among 760,846 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 214,992 had private insurance, 318,624 had Medicare, 96,192 were dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 107,548 had Medicaid, and 23,560 had no insurance. Overall, 76,250 died, 211,702 had nonhome discharges, 75,703 were mechanically ventilated, and 2,642 underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The adjusted odds of death were higher in patients with Medicare (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.35]; P < 0.0005), dually enrolled (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.30 to 1.50]; P < 0.0005), Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.20 to 1.36]; P < 0.0005), and no insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.26 to 1.62]; P < 0.0005) compared to patients with private insurance. Patients with Medicare (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47; [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.58]; P < 0.0005), dually enrolled (adjusted odds ratio, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.43]; P < 0.0005), Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.79]; P < 0.0005), and no insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.56]; P < 0.001) were less likely to be placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than patients with private insurance. Mortality, nonhome discharges, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization did not change significantly more in patients with private insurance compared to patients without private insurance as the COVID-19 burden increased.

Conclusions: Among patients with COVID-19, insurance-based disparities in mortality, nonhome discharges, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation utilization were substantial, but these disparities did not increase as the hospital COVID-19 burden increased.

Editor’s perspective:

Background: Although it has been established that elevated blood pressure and its variability worsen outcomes in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, antihypertensives use during the acute phase still lacks robust evidence. A blood pressure-lowering regimen using remifentanil and dexmedetomidine might be a reasonable therapeutic option given their analgesic and antisympathetic effects. The objective of this superiority trial was to validate the efficacy and safety of this blood pressure-lowering strategy that uses remifentanil and dexmedetomidine in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage.

Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, single-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial, patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and systolic blood pressure (SBP) 150 mmHg or greater were randomly allocated to the intervention group (a preset protocol with a standard guideline management using remifentanil and dexmedetomidine) or the control group (standard guideline-based management) to receive blood pressure-lowering treatment. The primary outcome was the SBP control rate (less than 140 mmHg) at 1 h posttreatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure variability, neurologic function, and clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 338 patients were allocated to the intervention (n = 167) or control group (n = 171). The SBP control rate at 1 h posttreatment initiation in the intervention group was higher than that in controls (101 of 161, 62.7% vs. 66 of 166, 39.8%; difference, 23.2%; 95% CI, 12.4 to 34.1%; P < 0.001). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated that patients in the intervention group could effectively reduce agitation while achieving lighter sedation, but no improvement in clinical outcomes was observed. Regarding safety, the incidence of bradycardia and respiratory depression was higher in the intervention group.

Conclusions: Among intracerebral hemorrhage patients with a SBP 150 mmHg or greater, a preset protocol using a remifentanil and dexmedetomidine-based standard guideline management significantly increased the SBP control rate at 1 h posttreatment compared with the standard guideline-based management.

Editor’s perspective:

Background: Little is known about the pharmacodynamic characteristics of liposomal bupivacaine. Hypothesizing that they would not identify pharmacodynamic differences from plain bupivacaine during the initial period after administration, but would find better long-term pharmacodynamic characteristics, the authors designed a randomized, controlled, triple-blinded, single-center study in volunteers.

Methods: Volunteers aged 18 to 55 yr (body mass index, 18 to 35 kg/m2) received two ulnar nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance. Using a crossover design with a washout phase of 36 days or more, one block was performed with liposomal and one with plain bupivacaine. Which came first was determined by randomization. Sensory data were collected by pinprick testing and motor data by thumb adduction, either way in comparison with the contralateral arm. Endpoints included success, time to onset, and duration of blockade. Residual efficacy was assessed by the volunteers keeping a diary. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank and exact McNemar's tests, as well as a generalized estimation equation model.

Results: Successful sensory blockade was noted in 8 of 25 volunteers (32%) after liposomal and in 25 of 25 (100%) after plain bupivacaine (P < 0.0001). Significant differences emerged for time to onset, defined as 0% response to pinpricking in four of five hypothenar supply areas (P < 0.0001), and for time from onset to 80% or 20% in one of five areas (P < 0.001; P < 0.001). Carryover effects due to the randomized sequencing were unlikely (estimate, -0.6286; sequence effect, 0.8772; P = 0.474). Self-assessment greater than 3.5 days did reveal, for liposomal bupivacaine only, intermittent but unpredictable episodes of residual sensory blockade.

Conclusions: The results show that liposomal bupivacaine is not a suitable "sole" drug for intraoperative regional anesthesia. Findings of its limited long-term efficacy add to existing evidence that a moderate effect, at best, should be expected on postoperative pain therapy.

Editor’s perspective:

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with a high risk of bleeding complications. The specific impact of ECMO on fibrinolysis remains unexplored. The objective of the current pilot observational prospective study was to investigate the longitudinal dynamics of fibrinolytic markers-i.e., changes over time-in the context of bleeding events in patients on ECMO.

Methods: Longitudinal dynamics of contact phase components (kininogen and bradykinin) and fibrinolysis markers (tissue plasminogen activator [tPA], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1], their complexes [tPA•PAI-1], plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, plasminogen, and D-dimer) were measured in patients undergoing venovenous and venoarterial ECMO, before implantation, at 0, 6, and 12 h after implantation, and daily thereafter.

Results: The cohort consisted of 30 patients (214 ECMO days). The concentrations of tPA, D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, PAI-1, and tPA•PAI-1 complexes were increased, whereas plasminogen decreased compared to normal values. A noteworthy divergence was observed between hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic patients: in bleeding patients, D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin, tPA, PAI-1, and tPA•PAI-1 followed an increasing kinetics before hemorrhage and then decreased to their baseline level; conversely, nonbleeding patients showed a decreasing kinetics in these markers. Also, D-dimer and tPA followed an increasing kinetics in bleeding patients compared to nonbleeding patients (median values for D-dimer dynamics: 1,080 vs. -440 ng/ml, P = 0.05; tPA dynamics: 0.130 vs. 0.100 nM, P = 0.038), and both markers significantly increased the day before hemorrhage. A tPA concentration above 0.304 nM was associated with bleeding events (odds ratio, 4.92; 95% CI, 1.01 to 24.08; P = 0.049).

Conclusions: Contact activation induces fibrinolysis in ECMO patients, especially in patients experiencing bleeding. This finding supports the role of this mechanism as a possible causal factor for hemorrhages during ECMO and open new avenues for novel therapeutic perspectives.

Editor’s perspective:

Background: High-dose corticosteroids have been used to attenuate the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass, but patient outcome benefits remain unclear. Our primary aim was to determine whether using dexamethasone was superior to not using dexamethasone to increase the number of home days in the first 30 days after cardiac surgery. Our secondary aim was to evaluate efficiency, value and impact of the novel trial design.

Methods: This pragmatic, international trial incorporating a prerandomized consent design favoring local practice enrolled patients undergoing cardiac surgery across 7 hospitals in Australia and The Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned to dexamethasone, 1 mg/kg, or not (control). The primary outcome was the number of days alive and at home up to 30 days after surgery ("home days"). Secondary outcomes included prolonged mechanical ventilation (>48 h), sepsis, renal failure, myocardial infarction, stroke and death.

Results: Of 2093 patients assessed for eligibility, 1951 were randomized (median age 63 years, 80% male). The median number of home days was 23.0 (IQR, 20.1 to 24.1) in the dexamethasone group and 23.1 (IQR, 20.1 to 24.6) in the no dexamethasone group; median difference 0.1 (95% CI, -0.3 to 0.5), P=0.66. The rates of prolonged mechanical ventilation, RR 0.72 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.08), sepsis, RR 1.02 (95% CI, 0.57 to 1.82), renal failure, RR 0.94 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.12), myocardial infarction, RR 1.20 (95% CI, 0.30 to 4.82), stroke, RR 1.06 (95% CI, 0.54 to 2.08), and death, RR 0.72 (95% CI, 0.22 to 2.35), were comparable between groups (all P>0.10). Dexamethasone reduced intensive care unit stay, median 29 (IQR, 22 to 50) h vs. 43 (24 to 72) h, P=0.004. Our novel trial design was highly efficient (89.3% enrolment).

Conclusions: Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, high-dose dexamethasone decreased intensive care unit stay but did not increase the number of home days after surgery.