Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England最新文献

Introduction: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can treat spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease and pseudoarthrosis. This approach facilitates complete discectomy, disc space distraction, indirect decompression of neural foramina and placement of large interbody devices. Several intra- and postoperative complications can be attributed to the anterior approach: vascular/visceral injury, hypogastric plexus injury and urogenital consequences. Spine-specific complications include implant migration, graft failure, pseudoarthrosis and persistent symptomology.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patient demographics, medium-term outcomes and complication rates following ALIF surgery performed over a 5-year period. A total of 110 consecutive patients had undergone ALIF surgery at a single tertiary spinal centre. The database was reviewed with a primary outcome of identifying postoperative 90-day complications and whether a revision anterior operation was required after primary ALIF.

Results: No patients required revision anterior operation after their primary ALIF surgery by final follow-up. Out of 110 patients, 11 (10%) recorded a complication attributed to the anterior stage of their operation within 90 days.

Conclusions: Our 90-day complication rate of 10% lies within the 2.6% acute complication and 40% overall complications rates described in previous literature. The risk of vascular/visceral injury is significant (3%) and we recommend that ALIF be performed as a dual surgeon procedure with a vascular-trained access surgeon accompanying the spinal surgeon. ALIF is a valid revision surgical option for failed posterior approaches leading to complications such as pseudoarthrosis. In our sample, 89% of patients were managed with posterior fixation to augment the anterior fusion as, biomechanically, this is a proven construct.

Introduction: The National Health Service contributes 4%-5% of England and Wales' greenhouse gases and a quarter of all public sector waste. Between 20% and 33% of healthcare waste originates from a hospital's operating room, and up to 90% of waste is sent for costly and unneeded hazardous waste processing. The goal of this study was to quantify the amount and type of waste produced during a selection of common trauma and elective orthopaedic operations, and to calculate the carbon footprint of processing the waste.

Methods: Waste generated for both elective and trauma procedures was separated primarily into clean and contaminated, paper or plastic, and then weighed. The annual carbon footprint for each operation at each site was subsequently calculated.

Results: Elective procedures can generate up to 16.5kg of plastic waste per procedure. Practices such as double-draping the patient contribute to increasing the quantity of waste. Over the procedures analysed, the mean total plastic waste at the hospital sites varied from 6 to 12kg. One hospital site undertook a pilot of switching disposable gowns for reusable ones with a subsequent reduction of 66% in the carbon footprint and a cost saving of £13,483.89.

Conclusions: This study sheds new light on the environmental impact of waste produced during trauma and elective orthopaedic procedures. Mitigating the environmental impact of the operating room requires a collective drive for a culture change to sustainability and social responsibility. Each clinician can have an impact upon the carbon footprint of their operating theatre.

Introduction: Climate change is estimated to be the biggest global health threat of the 21^st century, and has prompted calls to move away from processes in healthcare associated with high energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission. In musculoskeletal medicine, splints are widely used for limb immobilisation. These have typically been made from single-use materials such as gypsum, although in recent years purportedly environmentally friendly splints have been designed. In this systematic review, we set out to assess the clinical effectiveness of all commercially available environmentally friendly splinting materials, including Woodcast^®.

Methods: The AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), CINAHL^® (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase^®, Emcare^® and MEDLINE^® databases were searched to identify studies assessing the clinical effectiveness of biodegradable and environmentally friendly splints prior to paper review and data extraction. Formal quantitative synthesis was not possible owing to the substantial heterogeneity in the study designs and outcome measures.

Results: Six papers met the inclusion criteria, all investigating one particular splint material (Woodcast^®). One was a case series, two were cohort studies and three were randomised controlled trials. Primary outcome measures were heterogeneous but the environmentally friendly splints were generally equivalent to traditional splint materials. Studies were mostly at a high risk of bias.

Conclusions: There is limited research assessing 'green' splints in practice although the data suggest similarity with existing materials and no substantial safety concerns. Further scrutiny of the clinical effectiveness and environmental credentials of such splints is also required.

Introduction: Surgery represents a major source of carbon emissions, with numerous initiatives promoting more sustainable practices. Healthcare innovation and the development of a digitally capable workforce are fundamental in leveraging technologies to tackle challenges, including sustainability in surgery.

Methods: A surgical hackathon was organised with three major themes: (1) how to make surgery greener, (2) the future of plastic surgery in 10 years, and (3) improving healthcare outcomes using machine learning. Lectures were given on sustainability and innovation using the problem, innovation, market size, strategy and team (PIMST) framework to support their presentations, as well as technological support to translate ideas into simulations or minimum viable products. Pre- and post-event questionnaires were circulated to participants.

Results: Most attendees were medical students (65%), although doctors and engineers were also present. There was a significant increase in delegates' confidence in approaching innovation in surgery (+20%, p < 0.001). Reducing waste packaging (70%), promoting recyclable material usage (56%) and the social media dimension of public perceptions towards plastic surgery (40%) were reported as the most important issues arising from the hackathon. The top three prizes went to initiatives promoting an artificial intelligence-enhanced operative pathway, instrument sterilisation and an educational platform to teach students research and innovation skills.

Conclusions: Surgical hackathons can result in significant improvements in confidence in approaching innovation, as well as raising awareness of important healthcare challenges. Future innovation events may build on this to continue to empower the future workforce to leverage technologies to tackle healthcare challenges such as sustainability.

Introduction: Boerhaave syndrome is a rare clinical entity associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Early recognition of the symptoms, and identification of the site and extension of the injury are key in improving the prognosis.

Methods: This study presents data on the mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome. The data were retrieved from a prospectively collected database in a single surgical unit between 2012 and 2022. The study makes a comparison with the surgical outcomes of the previous decade.

Results: Some 33 patients were diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome and were treated surgically between 2012 and 2022 in a specialist upper gastrointestinal surgical unit. All patients underwent standard surgical repair (in-theatre diagnostic endoscopy, T-tube placement through thoracotomy and feeding jejunostomy through laparotomy). The mean size of the defects in the oesophageal lumen was 3.3cm. Delayed presentation was noted for 13 patients (39%); 8 patients (24%) died in hospital, and 19 patients (58%) developed postoperative complications. Mortality was similar to the rate recorded for the 20 patients from the previous decade (24% vs 20%, respectively). The mean length of hospital stay was 41 days, and was comparable to the 35.7 days reported between 1997 and 2011.

Conclusions: Early and aggressive management of spontaneous oesophageal rupture ameliorates the postoperative recovery and prognosis. The surgical results of our unit were found comparable to the previous decade in the population of patients who were treated surgically.

Introduction: The initial assessment of pregnant women presenting with significant injuries is more complicated than that of non-pregnant women because of physiological and anatomical changes, and the presence of the fetus. The aim of this study was to determine whether guidelines for the early management of severely injured pregnant women exist, which aspects of assessment/management they cover and to what extent there is national consistency.

Methods: A freedom of information request was submitted to 125 acute National Health Service trusts in England and six in Wales. The trusts were asked to confirm whether they have a guideline for the management of major trauma in pregnant women presenting to the emergency department and what the guidelines were.

Results: In total, 96.2% of trusts responded, of which 19% have a specific guideline and 7.9% have a generic guideline for assessing pregnant women in the emergency department, irrespective of injury severity. Of the responding trusts, 19.8% have a protocol that specifies when an obstetric trauma call should be put out by the emergency department and when a pregnant woman should be transferred to a major trauma centre for definitive management. Our results found that 69.8% routinely call obstetrics or gynaecology to the trauma call compared with 36.5% calling paediatrics.

Conclusions: The heterogeneity evident across trusts necessitates the establishment of national guidelines for the assessment of pregnant women with major trauma to standardise communication and delivery of care.

Introduction: Timely preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans are important for patients requiring emergency laparotomy. United Kingdom guidelines state that a CT scan should be reported within 1h for 'critical' patients (will alter management at the time) and within 12h for 'urgent' patients (will alter management but not necessarily that day).

Methods: An observational study included patients who were added to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) at a National Health Service trust from 2014 to 2021. The association of compliance with timings guidance and mortality was investigated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio of adherence to guidelines according to age, gender, night time admission, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, NELA mortality risk and category of scan. Further models determined the influence of adherence to guidelines on mortality, also adjusted for these variables.

Results: There were 1,299 patients (48% 'critical' and 52% 'urgent' CT scans). Only 360/1,299 (28%) of scans were undertaken with adherence to the timing guidelines. Critical scans were less likely to adhere to guidelines. Although univariable analysis suggested that adherence to guidelines was associated with reduced mortality, this was not the case in the multivariable model: only age, ASA and NELA mortality risk remained significantly associated with mortality.

Conclusions: A minority of patients met the recommended preoperative CT report timings, and this was less likely for scans designated 'critical'. This did not appear to affect mortality when adjusted for key variables of risk. This illustrates the phenomenon of guideline adherence appearing to affect patient outcomes as a product of selection bias rather than causality.