Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-03-07DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac039
Byung K Lee, Brian B Park, Richard J Bower
Selective androgenic receptor modulators (SARMs) are extensively advertised as safer and more effective analogues to traditional androgenic anabolic steroids, yet there are increasing cases of hepatotoxicity secondary to their use. We present the case of a previously healthy young active duty Marine who presented with cholestatic liver injury secondary to SARM use. This is the first reported case in a service member and contributes to the growing amount of evidence regarding the potential detrimental effects of SARMs. It also illustrates the impact of SARMs on military members and overall mission readiness as his treatment course included hospitalization and placement in a non-deployable status until recovery from his liver injury. Additional steps should be taken to increase awareness in order to protect service members and sustain readiness.
{"title":"Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator-Induced Liver Injury in Active Duty Male.","authors":"Byung K Lee, Brian B Park, Richard J Bower","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac039","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selective androgenic receptor modulators (SARMs) are extensively advertised as safer and more effective analogues to traditional androgenic anabolic steroids, yet there are increasing cases of hepatotoxicity secondary to their use. We present the case of a previously healthy young active duty Marine who presented with cholestatic liver injury secondary to SARM use. This is the first reported case in a service member and contributes to the growing amount of evidence regarding the potential detrimental effects of SARMs. It also illustrates the impact of SARMs on military members and overall mission readiness as his treatment course included hospitalization and placement in a non-deployable status until recovery from his liver injury. Additional steps should be taken to increase awareness in order to protect service members and sustain readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43926332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-05-18DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac115
John S Murray, Joan Clifford, Stacey Larson, Jonathan K Lee, Gary L Sculli
Introduction: The number of deaths in the United States related to medical errors remains unacceptably high. Further complicating this situation is the problem of underreporting due to the fear of the consequences. In fact, the most commonly reported cause of underreporting worldwide is the fear of the negative consequences associated with reporting. As health care organizations along the journey to high-reliability strive to improve patient safety, a concerted effort needs to be focused on changing how medical errors are addressed. A paradigm shift is needed from immediately assigning blame and punishing individuals to one that is trusting and just. Staff must trust that when errors occur, organizations will respond in a manner that is fair and appropriate.
Materials and methods: An extensive review of the literature from 2017 until January 2022 was conducted for the most current evidence describing the principles and practices of "just culture" in health care organizations. Additionally, recommendations were sought on how health care organizations can go about implementing "just culture" principles.
Results: Twenty sources of evidence on "just culture' were retrieved and reviewed. The evidence was used to describe the concept and principles of "just culture" in health care organizations. Furthermore, five strategies for implementing "just culture" principles were identified.
Conclusions: Improving patient safety requires that high-reliability organizations strive to ensure that the culture of the organization is trusting and just. In a trusting and just culture, adverse events are recognized as valuable opportunities to understand contributing factors and learn rather than immediately assign blame. Moving away from a blame culture is a paradigm shift for many health care organizations yet critically important for improving patient safety.
{"title":"Implementing Just Culture to Improve Patient Safety.","authors":"John S Murray, Joan Clifford, Stacey Larson, Jonathan K Lee, Gary L Sculli","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac115","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of deaths in the United States related to medical errors remains unacceptably high. Further complicating this situation is the problem of underreporting due to the fear of the consequences. In fact, the most commonly reported cause of underreporting worldwide is the fear of the negative consequences associated with reporting. As health care organizations along the journey to high-reliability strive to improve patient safety, a concerted effort needs to be focused on changing how medical errors are addressed. A paradigm shift is needed from immediately assigning blame and punishing individuals to one that is trusting and just. Staff must trust that when errors occur, organizations will respond in a manner that is fair and appropriate.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An extensive review of the literature from 2017 until January 2022 was conducted for the most current evidence describing the principles and practices of \"just culture\" in health care organizations. Additionally, recommendations were sought on how health care organizations can go about implementing \"just culture\" principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty sources of evidence on \"just culture' were retrieved and reviewed. The evidence was used to describe the concept and principles of \"just culture\" in health care organizations. Furthermore, five strategies for implementing \"just culture\" principles were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving patient safety requires that high-reliability organizations strive to ensure that the culture of the organization is trusting and just. In a trusting and just culture, adverse events are recognized as valuable opportunities to understand contributing factors and learn rather than immediately assign blame. Moving away from a blame culture is a paradigm shift for many health care organizations yet critically important for improving patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45189499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-03-12DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac052
Derek T Larson, Evan C Ewers, Kia M Gallagher, Alexandra M Mahoney, Madison L Paul, Peter J Weina
Background: Evidence has emerged showing potential benefit of Remdesivir and dexamethasone in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but results from large randomized control trials are conflicting. While initial data for dexamethasone indicated a mortality benefit, the impact of Remdesivir was best demonstrated in decreased time to recovery. Despite extensive disease burden throughout the world efficacy data of individual interventions is lacking in part due to extensive concurrent use of confounding investigational therapeutics.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the impact of Remdesivir and dexamethasone on real-world outcomes in severe COVID-19. All patients admitted to our community hospital between March 2020 and December 31, 2020 were included, and all patients admitted before national guidelines endorsed Remdesivir and dexamethasone outside of clinical trials were treated with only supportive care and used as historical controls. No other investigational therapeutics were utilized. This study was reviewed and approved by the Fort Belvoir Community Hospital IRB.
Results: 58 hospitalized patients met criteria for severe COVID-19 as confirmed by RT-PCR, and 14 (25%) were used as historical controls. Baseline demographics and overall mortality rate (7.1%) did not significantly differ between the groups. The median length of stay was 7 days and 6 days in the historical control group and interventional group, respectively (P = 0.55).
Conclusions: We did not observe an appreciable impact on the duration of hospitalization when Remdesivir and dexamethasone were added to supportive care in a community hospital. This study was not sufficiently powered to detect the previously described mortality benefit of dexamethasone.
{"title":"Real World Impact of Remdesivir and Dexamethasone on Clinical Outcomes of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 in a Community Hospital.","authors":"Derek T Larson, Evan C Ewers, Kia M Gallagher, Alexandra M Mahoney, Madison L Paul, Peter J Weina","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac052","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence has emerged showing potential benefit of Remdesivir and dexamethasone in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but results from large randomized control trials are conflicting. While initial data for dexamethasone indicated a mortality benefit, the impact of Remdesivir was best demonstrated in decreased time to recovery. Despite extensive disease burden throughout the world efficacy data of individual interventions is lacking in part due to extensive concurrent use of confounding investigational therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the impact of Remdesivir and dexamethasone on real-world outcomes in severe COVID-19. All patients admitted to our community hospital between March 2020 and December 31, 2020 were included, and all patients admitted before national guidelines endorsed Remdesivir and dexamethasone outside of clinical trials were treated with only supportive care and used as historical controls. No other investigational therapeutics were utilized. This study was reviewed and approved by the Fort Belvoir Community Hospital IRB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 hospitalized patients met criteria for severe COVID-19 as confirmed by RT-PCR, and 14 (25%) were used as historical controls. Baseline demographics and overall mortality rate (7.1%) did not significantly differ between the groups. The median length of stay was 7 days and 6 days in the historical control group and interventional group, respectively (P = 0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not observe an appreciable impact on the duration of hospitalization when Remdesivir and dexamethasone were added to supportive care in a community hospital. This study was not sufficiently powered to detect the previously described mortality benefit of dexamethasone.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47420324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-04-13DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac102
B Carter Maj, M Speier Col, M Anderson Capt
Introduction: In modern conflicts, deployed members are more vulnerable to craniomaxillofacial (CMF) injury than in previous conflicts. Patients presenting with CMF trauma are susceptible to post-trauma dental malocclusion and may require lengthy rehabilitation to achieve pre-injury function. This study surveyed military health care professionals who are potential contributors to CMF trauma rehabilitation teams to evaluate the orthodontist's inclusion in treating to the final outcome.
Methods: Following approval from the Defense Health Agency Information Management Collections Office (Control Number: 9-DHA-1031-E) and the Air Force 59th Medical Wing Institutional Review Board (Reference Number: FWH20210061E), a survey study was conducted from April 2021 to July 2021. Volunteer participants were recruited from orthodontists, oral maxillofacial surgeons, medical specialists, and other dental specialists who have worked in military healthcare. Respondents reported their current practice treating CMF trauma, self-evaluated their knowledge of different aspects of the process, and submitted their perceptions on system and patient-limiting factors which affect outcomes. Descriptive statistics were conducted for ordinal data and chi-square tests for categorical data. Kruskal-Wallis analyses of variance compared cohorts with further Mann-Whitney U tests to distinguish the difference in cohorts.
Results: Valid responses were collected from 171 participants. The responses were mostly from active duty military (93%) and well distributed among orthodontists, oral maxillofacial surgeons, other dental specialists, and medical specialists. When reporting current CMF trauma treatment practices, the majority of dental specialists stated they most commonly participate in a multidisciplinary team that addresses any CMF trauma case (68.4%) whereas medical specialists most commonly act as solo independent provider practice (53.6%). Dental specialists reported follow-up with post-trauma patients greater than 1 year and medical specialists reported the shortest post-trauma follow-up time with a median of 0 to 3 months. The majority of participants selected at least one system factor limiting CMF trauma care (78.7%) and at least one patient factor limiting CMF trauma care (86.3%). When asked about orthodontic participation in multidisciplinary teams, the responses showed a great range with orthodontists never included in CMF trauma care 23.1% of the time and always consulted regarding trauma cases 10.7% of the time. Other survey data collected allows the investigators to draw conclusions regarding specific limitations to treatment and recommendations for improvement, along with qualitative responses from survey participants.
Conclusions: Orthodontics, while available in the military, is underutilized in treating post-warfare or other CMF trauma. There are both system- and patient-lim
{"title":"The Orthodontist's Role in Post-Battlefield Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruction.","authors":"B Carter Maj, M Speier Col, M Anderson Capt","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac102","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In modern conflicts, deployed members are more vulnerable to craniomaxillofacial (CMF) injury than in previous conflicts. Patients presenting with CMF trauma are susceptible to post-trauma dental malocclusion and may require lengthy rehabilitation to achieve pre-injury function. This study surveyed military health care professionals who are potential contributors to CMF trauma rehabilitation teams to evaluate the orthodontist's inclusion in treating to the final outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following approval from the Defense Health Agency Information Management Collections Office (Control Number: 9-DHA-1031-E) and the Air Force 59th Medical Wing Institutional Review Board (Reference Number: FWH20210061E), a survey study was conducted from April 2021 to July 2021. Volunteer participants were recruited from orthodontists, oral maxillofacial surgeons, medical specialists, and other dental specialists who have worked in military healthcare. Respondents reported their current practice treating CMF trauma, self-evaluated their knowledge of different aspects of the process, and submitted their perceptions on system and patient-limiting factors which affect outcomes. Descriptive statistics were conducted for ordinal data and chi-square tests for categorical data. Kruskal-Wallis analyses of variance compared cohorts with further Mann-Whitney U tests to distinguish the difference in cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Valid responses were collected from 171 participants. The responses were mostly from active duty military (93%) and well distributed among orthodontists, oral maxillofacial surgeons, other dental specialists, and medical specialists. When reporting current CMF trauma treatment practices, the majority of dental specialists stated they most commonly participate in a multidisciplinary team that addresses any CMF trauma case (68.4%) whereas medical specialists most commonly act as solo independent provider practice (53.6%). Dental specialists reported follow-up with post-trauma patients greater than 1 year and medical specialists reported the shortest post-trauma follow-up time with a median of 0 to 3 months. The majority of participants selected at least one system factor limiting CMF trauma care (78.7%) and at least one patient factor limiting CMF trauma care (86.3%). When asked about orthodontic participation in multidisciplinary teams, the responses showed a great range with orthodontists never included in CMF trauma care 23.1% of the time and always consulted regarding trauma cases 10.7% of the time. Other survey data collected allows the investigators to draw conclusions regarding specific limitations to treatment and recommendations for improvement, along with qualitative responses from survey participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Orthodontics, while available in the military, is underutilized in treating post-warfare or other CMF trauma. There are both system- and patient-lim","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44302968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-05-27DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac142
Daniel J Brown, Lane Frasier, F Eric Robinson, Mark Cheney, William T Davis, Ann Salvator, Mark Andresen, Melissa Proctor, Ryan Earnest, Timothy Pritts, Richard Strilka
Introduction: The Critical Care Air Transport Team (CCATT) Advanced course utilizes fully immersive high-fidelity simulations to train CCATT personnel and assess their readiness for deployment. This study aims to (1) determine whether these simulations correctly discriminate between students with previous deployment experience ("experienced") and no deployment experience ("novices") and (2) examine the effects of students' clinical practice environment on their performance during training simulations.
Materials and methods: Critical Care Air Transport Team Advanced student survey data and course status (pass/no pass) between March 2006 and April 2020 were analyzed. The data included students' specialty, previous exposure to the CCATT Advanced course, previous CCATT deployment experience, years in clinical practice (<5, 5-15, and >15 years), and daily practice of critical care (yes/no), as well as a description of the students' hospital to include the total number of hospital (<100, 100-200, 201-400, and >400) and intensive care unit (0, 1-10, 11-20, and >20) beds. Following descriptive analysis and comparative tests, multivariable regression was used to identify the predictors of passing the CCATT Advanced course.
Results: A total of 2,723 surveys were analyzed: 841 (31%) were physicians (MDs), 1,035 (38%) were registered nurses, and 847 (31%) were respiratory therapists (RTs); 641 (24%) of the students were repeating the course for sustainment training and 664 (24%) had previous deployment experience. Grouped by student specialty, the MDs', registered nurses', and RTs' pass rates were 92.7%, 90.6%, and 85.6%, respectively. Multivariable regression results demonstrated that deployment experience was a robust predictor of passing. In addition, the >15 years in practice group had a 47% decrease in the odds of passing as compared to the 5 to 15 years in practice group. Finally, using MDs as the reference, the RTs had a 61% decrease in their odds of passing. The daily practice of critical care provided a borderline but nonsignificant passing advantage, whereas previous CCATT course exposure had no effect.
Conclusion: Our primary result was that the CCATT Advanced simulations that are used to evaluate whether the students are mission ready successfully differentiated "novice" from "experienced" students; this is consistent with valid simulation constructs. Finally, novice CCATT students do not sustain their readiness skills during the period between mandated refresher training.
{"title":"Relevance of Deployment Experience and Clinical Practice Characteristics on Military Critical Care Air Transport Team Readiness: A Study of Simulation Construct Validity.","authors":"Daniel J Brown, Lane Frasier, F Eric Robinson, Mark Cheney, William T Davis, Ann Salvator, Mark Andresen, Melissa Proctor, Ryan Earnest, Timothy Pritts, Richard Strilka","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac142","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Critical Care Air Transport Team (CCATT) Advanced course utilizes fully immersive high-fidelity simulations to train CCATT personnel and assess their readiness for deployment. This study aims to (1) determine whether these simulations correctly discriminate between students with previous deployment experience (\"experienced\") and no deployment experience (\"novices\") and (2) examine the effects of students' clinical practice environment on their performance during training simulations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Critical Care Air Transport Team Advanced student survey data and course status (pass/no pass) between March 2006 and April 2020 were analyzed. The data included students' specialty, previous exposure to the CCATT Advanced course, previous CCATT deployment experience, years in clinical practice (<5, 5-15, and >15 years), and daily practice of critical care (yes/no), as well as a description of the students' hospital to include the total number of hospital (<100, 100-200, 201-400, and >400) and intensive care unit (0, 1-10, 11-20, and >20) beds. Following descriptive analysis and comparative tests, multivariable regression was used to identify the predictors of passing the CCATT Advanced course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,723 surveys were analyzed: 841 (31%) were physicians (MDs), 1,035 (38%) were registered nurses, and 847 (31%) were respiratory therapists (RTs); 641 (24%) of the students were repeating the course for sustainment training and 664 (24%) had previous deployment experience. Grouped by student specialty, the MDs', registered nurses', and RTs' pass rates were 92.7%, 90.6%, and 85.6%, respectively. Multivariable regression results demonstrated that deployment experience was a robust predictor of passing. In addition, the >15 years in practice group had a 47% decrease in the odds of passing as compared to the 5 to 15 years in practice group. Finally, using MDs as the reference, the RTs had a 61% decrease in their odds of passing. The daily practice of critical care provided a borderline but nonsignificant passing advantage, whereas previous CCATT course exposure had no effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our primary result was that the CCATT Advanced simulations that are used to evaluate whether the students are mission ready successfully differentiated \"novice\" from \"experienced\" students; this is consistent with valid simulation constructs. Finally, novice CCATT students do not sustain their readiness skills during the period between mandated refresher training.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44332090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-03-26DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac075
Leif Åge Strand, Inger Rudvin, Einar Kristian Borud, Hans Jakob Bøe, Andreas Espetvedt Nordstrand, Elin Anita Fadum
Introduction: Norwegian military forces participated in the military campaign Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan starting in 2001. Military personnel often show a "healthy soldier effect" in terms of lowered all-cause mortality when compared to the general population. However, military service in conflict areas is associated with an increased risk of death from external causes such as transport accidents and suicide after discharge. We aimed to investigate cause-specific mortality in a cohort of 9,192 Norwegian (7.5% women) veterans deployed to Afghanistan between 2001 and 2019.
Materials and methods: We followed cohort members from their first day of service in Afghanistan through 2019. We computed standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) with 95% CIs by comparing the observed number of deaths in our cohort with the expected number of deaths in the general population. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated for the full follow-up period among men and women separately, and among men only for two time periods: during deployment and after discharge from service in Afghanistan.
Results: We observed 77 deaths (3 women and 74 men), 10 of which occurred during deployment (war casualties, 1 woman and 9 men); all others occurred after discharge. All-cause mortality in women did not differ from that in the general population (SMR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.11-1.53). For men, the observed all-cause mortality was lower than the expected rate for the full follow-up period (SMR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.69), during deployment, and after discharge, while deaths because of transport accidents after discharge (13 cases) were more than twice as high as expected rates (SMR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.26-4.04). The 11 observed suicides gave a nonstatistically significant, lower suicide risk compared to the expected rates (SMR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.33-1.18).
Conclusion: In accordance with the "healthy soldier effect," military service in Afghanistan was generally associated with a lower than expected risk of death both during deployment and after discharge. The risk of death from transport accidents was higher than expected after discharge, while the observed incidence of suicide did not differ from the expected rate in the general population.
{"title":"Cause-Specific Mortality Among Norwegian Veterans Deployed to Afghanistan Between 2001 and 2019.","authors":"Leif Åge Strand, Inger Rudvin, Einar Kristian Borud, Hans Jakob Bøe, Andreas Espetvedt Nordstrand, Elin Anita Fadum","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac075","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Norwegian military forces participated in the military campaign Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan starting in 2001. Military personnel often show a \"healthy soldier effect\" in terms of lowered all-cause mortality when compared to the general population. However, military service in conflict areas is associated with an increased risk of death from external causes such as transport accidents and suicide after discharge. We aimed to investigate cause-specific mortality in a cohort of 9,192 Norwegian (7.5% women) veterans deployed to Afghanistan between 2001 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We followed cohort members from their first day of service in Afghanistan through 2019. We computed standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) with 95% CIs by comparing the observed number of deaths in our cohort with the expected number of deaths in the general population. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated for the full follow-up period among men and women separately, and among men only for two time periods: during deployment and after discharge from service in Afghanistan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 77 deaths (3 women and 74 men), 10 of which occurred during deployment (war casualties, 1 woman and 9 men); all others occurred after discharge. All-cause mortality in women did not differ from that in the general population (SMR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.11-1.53). For men, the observed all-cause mortality was lower than the expected rate for the full follow-up period (SMR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.69), during deployment, and after discharge, while deaths because of transport accidents after discharge (13 cases) were more than twice as high as expected rates (SMR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.26-4.04). The 11 observed suicides gave a nonstatistically significant, lower suicide risk compared to the expected rates (SMR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.33-1.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In accordance with the \"healthy soldier effect,\" military service in Afghanistan was generally associated with a lower than expected risk of death both during deployment and after discharge. The risk of death from transport accidents was higher than expected after discharge, while the observed incidence of suicide did not differ from the expected rate in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48930153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-04-21DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac095
Stephan Rudzki
Introduction: Treatment outcomes for PTSD with current psychological therapies are poor, with very few patients achieving sustained symptom remission. A number of authors have identified physiological and immune disturbances in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) patients, but there is no unifying hypothesis that explains the myriad features of the disorder.
Materials and methods: The medical literature was reviewed over a 6-year period primarily using the medical database PUBMED.
Results: The literature contains numerous papers that have identified a range of physiological and immune dysfunction in association with PTSD. This paper proposes that unrestrained cytokine signaling induces epigenetic changes that promote an evolutionary survival adaptation, which maintains a defensive PTSD phenotype. The brain can associate immune signaling with past threat and initiate a defensive behavioral response. The sympathetic nervous system is pro-inflammatory, while the parasympathetic nervous system is anti-inflammatory. Prolonged cholinergic withdrawal will promote a chronic inflammatory state. The innate immune cytokine IL-1β has pleiotropic properties and can regulate autonomic, glucocorticoid, and glutamate receptor functions, sleep, memory, and epigenetic enzymes. Changes in epigenetic enzyme activity can potentially alter phenotype and induce an adaptation. Levels of IL-1β correlate with severity and duration of PTSD and PTSD can be prevented by bolus administration of hydrocortisone in acute sepsis, consistent with unrestrained inflammation being a risk factor for PTSD. The nervous and immune systems engage in crosstalk, governed by common receptors. The benefits of currently used psychiatric medication may arise from immune, as well as synaptic, modulation. The psychedelic drugs (3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), psilocybin, and ketamine) have potent immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects on the adaptive immune system, which may contribute to their reported benefit in PTSD. There may be distinct PTSD phenotypes induced by innate and adaptive cytokine signaling.
Conclusion: In order for an organism to survive, it must adapt to its environment. Cytokines signal danger to the brain and can induce epigenetic changes that result in a persistent defensive phenotype. PTSD may be the price individuals pay for the genomic flexibility that promotes adaptation and survival.
{"title":"Is PTSD an Evolutionary Survival Adaptation Initiated by Unrestrained Cytokine Signaling and Maintained by Epigenetic Change?","authors":"Stephan Rudzki","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac095","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment outcomes for PTSD with current psychological therapies are poor, with very few patients achieving sustained symptom remission. A number of authors have identified physiological and immune disturbances in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) patients, but there is no unifying hypothesis that explains the myriad features of the disorder.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The medical literature was reviewed over a 6-year period primarily using the medical database PUBMED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature contains numerous papers that have identified a range of physiological and immune dysfunction in association with PTSD. This paper proposes that unrestrained cytokine signaling induces epigenetic changes that promote an evolutionary survival adaptation, which maintains a defensive PTSD phenotype. The brain can associate immune signaling with past threat and initiate a defensive behavioral response. The sympathetic nervous system is pro-inflammatory, while the parasympathetic nervous system is anti-inflammatory. Prolonged cholinergic withdrawal will promote a chronic inflammatory state. The innate immune cytokine IL-1β has pleiotropic properties and can regulate autonomic, glucocorticoid, and glutamate receptor functions, sleep, memory, and epigenetic enzymes. Changes in epigenetic enzyme activity can potentially alter phenotype and induce an adaptation. Levels of IL-1β correlate with severity and duration of PTSD and PTSD can be prevented by bolus administration of hydrocortisone in acute sepsis, consistent with unrestrained inflammation being a risk factor for PTSD. The nervous and immune systems engage in crosstalk, governed by common receptors. The benefits of currently used psychiatric medication may arise from immune, as well as synaptic, modulation. The psychedelic drugs (3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), psilocybin, and ketamine) have potent immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects on the adaptive immune system, which may contribute to their reported benefit in PTSD. There may be distinct PTSD phenotypes induced by innate and adaptive cytokine signaling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order for an organism to survive, it must adapt to its environment. Cytokines signal danger to the brain and can induce epigenetic changes that result in a persistent defensive phenotype. PTSD may be the price individuals pay for the genomic flexibility that promotes adaptation and survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47951786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-03-12DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac064
Josh Halfpap, Laura Riebel, Angela Tognoni, Michael Coller, Robert G Sheu, Michael D Rosenthal
Introduction: Spine pain is one of the largest and costliest burdens to our healthcare systems. While evidence-based guidelines for spine pain have been established, and continue to evolve, the actual management of this condition continues to burden the healthcare system. This has led to increased costs due to inefficient entry to healthcare, utilization of treatments unsupported by clinical guidelines, and patient navigation through our healthcare systems. The purpose of this study was to assess the healthcare utilization and related outcomes for Active Duty Service Members (ADSM) receiving healthcare services in a novel acute spine pain clinic (ASPC) during the first 5 years of operation at a large Military Treatment Facility.
Materials and methods: In 2014 the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy (PT) services designed a novel acute spine clinic intended to directly receive ADSM with acute spine symptoms for an initial evaluation by a Physical Therapist. The inclusion criteria into the ASPC were: ADSM, pain less than or equal to 7 days, no more than three prior episodes of acute spine pain in the past 3 years, and not currently receiving care from Chiropractic, Pain Management, or PT services. The exclusion criteria were: significant and/or progressive neurological deficits, bowel or bladder dysfunction, unstable vital signs or fever, hematuria or extensive trauma.
Results: A total of 1,215 patients presented to the ASPC for evaluation between 2014 and 2019. The most common chief complaint was acute pain in the lumbar spine (73%), followed by cervical spine pain (15%), and thoracic spine pain (12%) represented the fewest. The average number of PT visits per patient was 3.5 (range 1-13) with 61.1% utilizing three or fewer visits. Over 95% of cases returned to work the same day as their initial evaluation. Sixty-six percent returned to work without restriction the same day as their initial evaluation. Light duty recommendations were provided to 412 (33.9%) patients ranging from one to 30 days, with greater than 85% of the light duty being less than 14 days. Recommendations to not return to work (sick-in-quarters) were issued to 56 (4.6%) patients. The sick-in-quarters recommendations were for a 24-hour period in 48 cases, 48 hours for seven cases, and 72 hours for one case. All encounters in which the patient first sought care at the ASPC for low back pain met the Healthcare Effectiveness Data Set standard for low back pain care of having no imaging within 28 days of the first encounter for nonspecific low back pain. A medical record review of 100 randomly selected patients within 12 months of the initial evaluation demonstrated decreased utilization of medication, imaging, and referral to surgical services.
Conclusions: This innovative approach demonstrates the potential benefits of rapid access to treatment and education for patients w
{"title":"Improving Access and Decreasing Healthcare Utilization for Patients With Acute Spine Pain: Five-Year Results of a Direct Access Clinic.","authors":"Josh Halfpap, Laura Riebel, Angela Tognoni, Michael Coller, Robert G Sheu, Michael D Rosenthal","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac064","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spine pain is one of the largest and costliest burdens to our healthcare systems. While evidence-based guidelines for spine pain have been established, and continue to evolve, the actual management of this condition continues to burden the healthcare system. This has led to increased costs due to inefficient entry to healthcare, utilization of treatments unsupported by clinical guidelines, and patient navigation through our healthcare systems. The purpose of this study was to assess the healthcare utilization and related outcomes for Active Duty Service Members (ADSM) receiving healthcare services in a novel acute spine pain clinic (ASPC) during the first 5 years of operation at a large Military Treatment Facility.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In 2014 the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy (PT) services designed a novel acute spine clinic intended to directly receive ADSM with acute spine symptoms for an initial evaluation by a Physical Therapist. The inclusion criteria into the ASPC were: ADSM, pain less than or equal to 7 days, no more than three prior episodes of acute spine pain in the past 3 years, and not currently receiving care from Chiropractic, Pain Management, or PT services. The exclusion criteria were: significant and/or progressive neurological deficits, bowel or bladder dysfunction, unstable vital signs or fever, hematuria or extensive trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,215 patients presented to the ASPC for evaluation between 2014 and 2019. The most common chief complaint was acute pain in the lumbar spine (73%), followed by cervical spine pain (15%), and thoracic spine pain (12%) represented the fewest. The average number of PT visits per patient was 3.5 (range 1-13) with 61.1% utilizing three or fewer visits. Over 95% of cases returned to work the same day as their initial evaluation. Sixty-six percent returned to work without restriction the same day as their initial evaluation. Light duty recommendations were provided to 412 (33.9%) patients ranging from one to 30 days, with greater than 85% of the light duty being less than 14 days. Recommendations to not return to work (sick-in-quarters) were issued to 56 (4.6%) patients. The sick-in-quarters recommendations were for a 24-hour period in 48 cases, 48 hours for seven cases, and 72 hours for one case. All encounters in which the patient first sought care at the ASPC for low back pain met the Healthcare Effectiveness Data Set standard for low back pain care of having no imaging within 28 days of the first encounter for nonspecific low back pain. A medical record review of 100 randomly selected patients within 12 months of the initial evaluation demonstrated decreased utilization of medication, imaging, and referral to surgical services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This innovative approach demonstrates the potential benefits of rapid access to treatment and education for patients w","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46492395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-04-22DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac106
Caleb Chitwood, Karlie L Haug, Cody Wenthur, Carly Gillis, James D Maloney, Diane Johnson
Objectives: To evaluate facility postoperative opioid prescribing patterns in comparison to published guidelines and adherence to opioid safety mandates.
Methods: This quality analysis was performed between November 2019 and March 2020. Patients were identified to have been opioid naïve prior to receiving a new opioid prescription postoperatively during the study period. Patient charts were reviewed, and patients were contacted to collect desired data. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate distributions of morphine equivalent daily dose and opioid day supply prescribed across study subpopulations.
Results: Ninety-four of 100 prescriptions evaluated were determined to be within quantity or duration recommendations of the selected guideline. Statistical analysis found no significantly different distributions between the duration and quantity of opioid prescribed at discharge and patient-specific risk factors. Forty-eight patients did not use the entire quantity of the initial opioid prescription dispensed. Of those patients, 26 still had opioids within the home. Opioid risk review documentation was completed in 19 of 65 patients indicated for documentation.
Conclusion: Most opioid prescriptions provided within the study period aligned with recommendations from author-selected guidelines. However, a review of risk prior to opioid prescribing frequently was not performed. The number of patients utilizing less than 50% of prescribed opioids, and few refills indicate that reductions in opioids prescribed would improve safety for both patients and the surrounding community without increasing the risk for the under-treatment of postoperative pain. Improved prescribing habits and patient safety will be targeted through provider education regarding risk review documentation in opioid naïve patients.
{"title":"Evaluation of Prescribing Patterns Following Surgical Procedures in Opioid Naïve Patients at a Veterans Affairs Teaching Hospital.","authors":"Caleb Chitwood, Karlie L Haug, Cody Wenthur, Carly Gillis, James D Maloney, Diane Johnson","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac106","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate facility postoperative opioid prescribing patterns in comparison to published guidelines and adherence to opioid safety mandates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality analysis was performed between November 2019 and March 2020. Patients were identified to have been opioid naïve prior to receiving a new opioid prescription postoperatively during the study period. Patient charts were reviewed, and patients were contacted to collect desired data. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate distributions of morphine equivalent daily dose and opioid day supply prescribed across study subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four of 100 prescriptions evaluated were determined to be within quantity or duration recommendations of the selected guideline. Statistical analysis found no significantly different distributions between the duration and quantity of opioid prescribed at discharge and patient-specific risk factors. Forty-eight patients did not use the entire quantity of the initial opioid prescription dispensed. Of those patients, 26 still had opioids within the home. Opioid risk review documentation was completed in 19 of 65 patients indicated for documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most opioid prescriptions provided within the study period aligned with recommendations from author-selected guidelines. However, a review of risk prior to opioid prescribing frequently was not performed. The number of patients utilizing less than 50% of prescribed opioids, and few refills indicate that reductions in opioids prescribed would improve safety for both patients and the surrounding community without increasing the risk for the under-treatment of postoperative pain. Improved prescribing habits and patient safety will be targeted through provider education regarding risk review documentation in opioid naïve patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45124509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-22Epub Date: 2022-04-05DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac084
Alan P Gehrich, Keane McCullum, Michael B Lustik, Collin Sitler, Keith Hauret, David DeGroot
Introduction: The World Health Organization considers the optimal rate of delivery by Cesarean among healthy nulliparous women to be <15%. In 2020, the rate of primary Cesarean delivery (CD) in the US among nulliparous women with singleton, vertex pregnancies was 26%. An enhanced understanding of factors associated with women undergoing CD may assist in reducing this rate. One potential factor is the level of physical fitness in women before pregnancy. Active duty (AD) soldiers provide a cohort of women who begin pregnancy while actively pursuing physical fitness. The research team sought to assess the effects of pre-pregnancy physical fitness of AD soldiers as measured by the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) on the incidence of CD in AD women, in addition to examining known demographic and pregnancy risk factors in this cohort.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of healthy AD nulliparous women who delivered their singleton pregnancy of >32 weeks at a tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2016. Soldiers undergoing non-labored CD were excluded. Demographics, pre-pregnancy APFT results, antepartum and labor and delivery data were collected from the Digital Training Management System, the outpatient, and inpatient medical records respectively. Weight gain in pregnancy was assessed using the Institute of Medicine Guidelines for pregnancy. Fisher's exact tests and chi-squared tests assessed associations between categorical outcomes, and unpaired t-tests assessed differences in APFT scores between women who underwent CD vs. vaginal delivery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess for independent risk factors among all collected variables. The protocol was approved by the Regional Health Command-Pacific Institutional Review Board.
Results: Five-hundred-and-twenty-three women delivering singleton pregnancies between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed for this study. Three-hundred ninety women met inclusion criteria: 316 in the vaginal delivery cohort, and 74 in the CD cohort, with a CD rate of 19%. Twenty non-labored CDs were excluded. Neither total APFT performance nor performance on the individual push-up, sit-up or run events in the 15 months prior to pregnancy was associated with mode of delivery. Excessive gestational weight gain (EWG) and neonatal birth weight were the only two factors independently associated with an increased rate of cesarean delivery. Women who had excessive gestational weight gain, were twice as likely to undergo CD as those who had adequate or insufficient weight gain (24% vs. 12%, p = 0.004). Soldiers delivering a neonate ≥4,000 g were 2.8 times as likely to undergo CD as those delivering a neonate <4,000 g (47% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Age, race, and rank, a surrogate marker for socioeconomic status, were not associated with mode of delivery.
Conclusion: Pre-pregnancy fitness levels as measured by t
{"title":"Pre-Pregnancy Physical Fitness, Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain as Risk Factors for Cesarean Delivery: A Study of Active Duty Women.","authors":"Alan P Gehrich, Keane McCullum, Michael B Lustik, Collin Sitler, Keith Hauret, David DeGroot","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac084","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usac084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization considers the optimal rate of delivery by Cesarean among healthy nulliparous women to be <15%. In 2020, the rate of primary Cesarean delivery (CD) in the US among nulliparous women with singleton, vertex pregnancies was 26%. An enhanced understanding of factors associated with women undergoing CD may assist in reducing this rate. One potential factor is the level of physical fitness in women before pregnancy. Active duty (AD) soldiers provide a cohort of women who begin pregnancy while actively pursuing physical fitness. The research team sought to assess the effects of pre-pregnancy physical fitness of AD soldiers as measured by the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) on the incidence of CD in AD women, in addition to examining known demographic and pregnancy risk factors in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of healthy AD nulliparous women who delivered their singleton pregnancy of >32 weeks at a tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2016. Soldiers undergoing non-labored CD were excluded. Demographics, pre-pregnancy APFT results, antepartum and labor and delivery data were collected from the Digital Training Management System, the outpatient, and inpatient medical records respectively. Weight gain in pregnancy was assessed using the Institute of Medicine Guidelines for pregnancy. Fisher's exact tests and chi-squared tests assessed associations between categorical outcomes, and unpaired t-tests assessed differences in APFT scores between women who underwent CD vs. vaginal delivery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess for independent risk factors among all collected variables. The protocol was approved by the Regional Health Command-Pacific Institutional Review Board.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-hundred-and-twenty-three women delivering singleton pregnancies between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed for this study. Three-hundred ninety women met inclusion criteria: 316 in the vaginal delivery cohort, and 74 in the CD cohort, with a CD rate of 19%. Twenty non-labored CDs were excluded. Neither total APFT performance nor performance on the individual push-up, sit-up or run events in the 15 months prior to pregnancy was associated with mode of delivery. Excessive gestational weight gain (EWG) and neonatal birth weight were the only two factors independently associated with an increased rate of cesarean delivery. Women who had excessive gestational weight gain, were twice as likely to undergo CD as those who had adequate or insufficient weight gain (24% vs. 12%, p = 0.004). Soldiers delivering a neonate ≥4,000 g were 2.8 times as likely to undergo CD as those delivering a neonate <4,000 g (47% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Age, race, and rank, a surrogate marker for socioeconomic status, were not associated with mode of delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-pregnancy fitness levels as measured by t","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41598416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}