Introduction: The Army uses permethrin-treated uniforms as the primary method to protect soldiers from tick-borne diseases. Permethrin binds strongly to fabric and provides long-term protection against many blood-feeding arthropods. However, protection decreases if the uniforms are not washed and cared for according to label instructions. This study was conducted among cadets at the United States Military Academy (USMA) at West Point, NY, to determine what the cadets know about permethrin and how they care for and wear their uniforms. West Point is in an area with high rates of tick-borne disease transmission. A survey was developed to determine what cadets know about the threat of tick-borne diseases and if they wear and maintain their uniforms in a manner that effectively maintains permethrin levels.
Materials and methods: A 16-question survey was developed and submitted to the local review board for approval. The study was classified as human subjects research according to 32CFR219 and met the requirements for exempt status under 32CFR219.104(d)(2)(i). After receiving approval, a hard copy survey was distributed among cadets with efforts to sample at least 50 members from each cadet class.
Results: A total of 319 cadets provided responses to the survey questions, representing more than 7% of the cadet population at the USMA. The results showed most cadets knew their uniforms were treated with permethrin, but less than half knew there are specific instructions attached to their uniforms describing how the uniforms should be laundered. From the cadets who knew there were instructions, most admittedly did not follow the instructions. Sixteen percent of cadets said they had dry-cleaned their uniforms. This is a process known to remove most of the permethrin. The majority of cadets viewed the risk of tick-borne disease at West Point to be moderate or lower.
Conclusions: This study provides a basic understanding of the wear patterns of permethrin-treated uniforms among cadets at the USMA. It is also one of the few studies to measure knowledge and uniform-wearing behavior among service members since the Army switched to factory-treated uniforms in 2013. The results indicate that compliance with uniform laundry and care instructions is low. This information is useful to develop training plans and educate cadets how they can wear and take care of their permethrin-treated uniforms to better protect themselves from tick-borne diseases.
Introduction: The number of deaths in the United States related to medical errors remains unacceptably high. Further complicating this situation is the problem of underreporting due to the fear of the consequences. In fact, the most commonly reported cause of underreporting worldwide is the fear of the negative consequences associated with reporting. As health care organizations along the journey to high-reliability strive to improve patient safety, a concerted effort needs to be focused on changing how medical errors are addressed. A paradigm shift is needed from immediately assigning blame and punishing individuals to one that is trusting and just. Staff must trust that when errors occur, organizations will respond in a manner that is fair and appropriate.
Materials and methods: An extensive review of the literature from 2017 until January 2022 was conducted for the most current evidence describing the principles and practices of "just culture" in health care organizations. Additionally, recommendations were sought on how health care organizations can go about implementing "just culture" principles.
Results: Twenty sources of evidence on "just culture' were retrieved and reviewed. The evidence was used to describe the concept and principles of "just culture" in health care organizations. Furthermore, five strategies for implementing "just culture" principles were identified.
Conclusions: Improving patient safety requires that high-reliability organizations strive to ensure that the culture of the organization is trusting and just. In a trusting and just culture, adverse events are recognized as valuable opportunities to understand contributing factors and learn rather than immediately assign blame. Moving away from a blame culture is a paradigm shift for many health care organizations yet critically important for improving patient safety.
Introduction: Promoting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine acceptance and uptake became necessary to achieve a high vaccination rate and subsequently herd immunity. Although the Israeli population has been largely acceptant of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, vaccine hesitancy has remained a major concern, especially in younger adults. We hypothesized that young adults who refused SARS-CoV-2 vaccination differed from those who have been adherent and could be characterized. Studying this specific population and recognizing individuals within this group who might be more probable to refuse vaccination can enable to target measures to further promote vaccination acceptance.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional comparison in a study population comprised of 17,435 Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) personnel who were SARS-CoV-2 vaccine eligible. This group included 14,834 vaccinated and 2,601 nonvaccinated individuals. Patient characteristics including occupational parameters, demographic features, psychotechnical grading (an intelligence assessment score), education level, and medical background were collected.
Results: The median age was 20.57 years and almost 80% were males. At the time of data collection, most individuals (85.1%, n = 14,834) have been vaccinated. Officers and noncommissioned officers were more likely to be vaccinated compared with regular soldiers (96%, and 90.2% vs. 83.3% respectively, P < .001), as well as combat battalions stationed personnel compared to their peers in rear and administrative units (89.4% vs. 78.4%, P < .001). Socioeconomic clusters were also associated with vaccination adherence, with 92.9% vs. 79.5% vaccination rates in the highest and lowest clusters, respectively (P < .001). Younger age, no previous immigration status, higher education level, and higher psychotechnical grades were also found associated with an increased likelihood of being vaccinated (P < .001).
Conclusions: In a large cohort of enlisted IDF personnel, disparity in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine adherence was found to be related to multiple socioeconomic, educational, and military service-related variables. Although some differences were substantial, others were small and of questionable public health significance. Acknowledging these differences may enable community leaders, health care providers, and administrators to target specific populations in order to further promote SARS-CoV-2 vaccination acceptance.